Evaluation of a tailored injection profile (TIP) algorithm for uniform contrast-enhanced signal intensity profiles in MR angiography: Tailored Injection Profile (TIP)

Relationship Between Simulated Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Injection Profile and Achievable Resolution Metrics in Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography

BACKGROUND

Contrast bolus variation during contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) acquisition may lead to vessel blurring.

PURPOSE

To combine knowledge of how contrast signal intensity (SI) evolves for different injection strategies with anatomically familiar parametric computer models to measure and visually assess the effects of a wide range of variables on modeled CE-MRA, and in doing so develop contrast rate injection guidelines.

STUDY TYPE

Computer modeling.

PHANTOM

Digital three-dimensional phantom consisting of orthogonal "aorta," 7 mm diameter "renal arteries" (with 57% and 86% diameter stenoses), and 7 mm diameter "superior mesenteric artery" (with 57% diameter stenosis).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

One millimeter in-plane resolution arterial CE-MRA imaging at 3 T.

ASSESSMENT

"Background" (time invariant) and "vascular" (time varying) components of the phantom were each Fourier transformed into the spatial frequency domain, the latter modulated by the SI evolution of a contrast bolus of varying "plateau" lengths and "tail" heights. Data are presented as surface plots of stenosis measurement error and blurring vs. a reference-standard injection.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Descriptive.

RESULTS

Shorter plateau lengths and lower tail heights resulted in increased measured stenosis error and blurring vs. the reference standard. Under a 44-second acquisition, full width half maximum stenosis error of the 86% stenosis with 25% plateau length and 25% tail height is 24% as compared to that from the reference standard. As plateau length and tail height approach 100%, stenosis error and blurring approach a floor defined by the MR acquisition's limitations.

DATA CONCLUSION

We propose that to achieve minimal degradation with CE-MRA, one can create a contrast bolus with either 60% plateau and 50% tail height or 80% plateau with any tail. These considerations may well prove to be of practical importance, possibly via manipulating the tail by means of multiphasic contrast injections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Evaluation of four injection profiles for uniform contrast-enhanced signal intensity profiles in MR angiography

BACKGROUND

Gadolinium concentration variation during acquisition of contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) may lead to artifacts.

PURPOSE

To compare signal intensity (SI) profiles of four different contrast agent injection strategies during CE-MRA with the goal of minimizing SI variation during acquisition.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

SUBJECTS

Forty subjects randomized to receive one of four injection profiles of gadobenate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg), either undiluted (0.5 M) or diluted to 40 ml total volume. Tested profiles: 1) nondiluted single-phase ("standard" NS; 1.6 ml/s), 2) diluted single-phase (DS; 1.6 ml/s), 3) diluted biphasic (DB; 9 ml @ 3.3 ml/s, 29 ml @ 1.4 ml/s), 4) patient-tailored protocol using linear prediction (DT).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Time-resolved SI measured at 3T with spoiled gradient echo sequences having analogous parameters to those of CE-MRA.

ASSESSMENT

Plateau arrival time, rise time, duration, peak and tail SI, plateau quality (sum of squared residuals; SSR), average SI for each injection type derived were used.

STATISTICAL TEST

Two-tailed t-test.

RESULTS

Peak SI, arrival, and rise times were not significantly different between groups, excepting peak SI DB slightly > DS (P = 0.042). Duration of NS vs. the diluted groups was significantly shorter (all P < 0.0001), and DS duration was significantly shorter than that of DT and DB (NS 11.4 ± 3.5 vs. DS 22.9 ± 4.3, DB 25.4 ± 2.3, DT 28.3 ± 4.1 sec). Quality (SSR) of the 20-second plateau was significantly better for DS, DB, DT as compared with NS (all P < 0.001).

DATA CONCLUSION

Three different strategies to power-inject diluted gadobenate dimeglumine targeting a 20-second plateau produced SI profiles with longer duration, more consistent plateau, and no significant loss in peak SI. Such injection profiles may provide more uniform SI during CE-MRA, potentially reducing blurring artifacts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1808-1816.

Magnetic resonance angiography imaging of pulmonary embolism using agents with blood pool properties as an alternative to computed tomography to avoid radiation exposure

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a combined magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) - magnetic resonance venography (MRV) protocol using contrast agents with blood pool properties, gadofosveset trisodium and gadobenate dimeglumine, in the evaluation of pulmonary embolus (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) as compared to the standard clinical reference imaging modalities; computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and color-coded Duplex ultrasound (DUS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective clinical study recruited patients presenting to the emergency department with clinical suspicion for PE and scheduled for a clinically indicated CTPA. We performed both MRA of the chest for the evaluation of PE as well as MRV of the pelvis and thighs to evaluate for DVT using a single contrast injection. MRA-MRV data was compared to the clinical reference standard CTPA and DUS, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were recruited. The results on a per-patient basis comparing MRA to CTPA for pulmonary embolus yielded 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity. There was a small subset of patients that underwent clinical DUS to evaluate for DVT, which demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for MRV.

CONCLUSIONS

This single-center, preliminary study using contrast agents with blood pool properties to perform a relatively rapid combined MRA-MRV exam to image for PE and above knee DVT shows potential as an alternative imaging choice to CTPA. Further large-scale, multicentre studies are warranted.

Quantitative myocardial perfusion from static cardiac and dynamic arterial CT

Quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) estimation by dynamic contrast enhanced cardiac computed tomography (CT) requires multi-frame acquisition of contrast transit through the blood pool and myocardium to inform the arterial input and tissue response functions. Both the input and the tissue response functions for the entire myocardium are sampled with each acquisition. However, the long breath holds and frequent sampling can result in significant motion artifacts and relatively high radiation dose. To address these limitations, we propose and evaluate a new static cardiac and dynamic arterial (SCDA) quantitative MBF approach where (1) the input function is well sampled using either prediction from pre-scan timing bolus data or measured from dynamic thin slice 'bolus tracking' acquisitions, and (2) the whole-heart tissue response data is limited to one contrast enhanced CT acquisition. A perfusion model uses the dynamic arterial input function to generate a family of possible myocardial contrast enhancement curves corresponding to a range of MBF values. Combined with the timing of the single whole-heart acquisition, these curves generate a lookup table relating myocardial contrast enhancement to quantitative MBF. We tested the SCDA approach in 28 patients that underwent a full dynamic CT protocol both at rest and vasodilator stress conditions. Using measured input function plus single (enhanced CT only) or plus double (enhanced and contrast free baseline CT's) myocardial acquisitions yielded MBF estimates with root mean square (RMS) error of 1.2 ml/min/g and 0.35 ml/min/g, and radiation dose reductions of 90% and 83%, respectively. The prediction of the input function based on timing bolus data and the static acquisition had an RMS error compared to the measured input function of 26.0% which led to MBF estimation errors greater than threefold higher than using the measured input function. SCDA presents a new, simplified approach for quantitative perfusion imaging with an acquisition strategy offering substantial radiation dose and computational complexity savings over dynamic CT.