1
|
Yuan Q, Recchimuzzi DZ, Costa DN. Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging of Prostate. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2024; 32:171-179. [PMID: 38007279 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2023.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion imaging, both with and without exogenous contrast agents, has the potential to assess tissue perfusion and vascularity in prostate cancer. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI is an important element of the clinical non-invasive multiparametric MRI, which can be used to differentiate benign from malignant lesions, to stage tumors, and to monitor response to therapy. The arterial spin labeled (ASL) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted MRI have the advantage of quantitative perfusion measurements without the concerns of gadolinium-based contrast agent safety and retention issues. The adoption of these non-contrast techniques in clinical practice needs more research and clinical evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Yuan
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
| | - Debora Z Recchimuzzi
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Daniel N Costa
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2201 Inwood Road, TX 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
LoCastro E, Paudyal R, Konar AS, LaViolette PS, Akin O, Hatzoglou V, Goh AC, Bochner BH, Rosenberg J, Wong RJ, Lee NY, Schwartz LH, Shukla-Dave A. A Quantitative Multiparametric MRI Analysis Platform for Estimation of Robust Imaging Biomarkers in Clinical Oncology. Tomography 2023; 9:2052-2066. [PMID: 37987347 PMCID: PMC10661267 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9060161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
There is a need to develop user-friendly imaging tools estimating robust quantitative biomarkers (QIBs) from multiparametric (mp)MRI for clinical applications in oncology. Quantitative metrics derived from (mp)MRI can monitor and predict early responses to treatment, often prior to anatomical changes. We have developed a vendor-agnostic, flexible, and user-friendly MATLAB-based toolkit, MRI-Quantitative Analysis and Multiparametric Evaluation Routines ("MRI-QAMPER", current release v3.0), for the estimation of quantitative metrics from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and multi-b value diffusion-weighted (DW) MR and MR relaxometry. MRI-QAMPER's functionality includes generating numerical parametric maps from these methods reflecting tumor permeability, cellularity, and tissue morphology. MRI-QAMPER routines were validated using digital reference objects (DROs) for DCE and DW MRI, serving as initial approval stages in the National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network (NCI/QIN) software benchmark. MRI-QAMPER has participated in DCE and DW MRI Collaborative Challenge Projects (CCPs), which are key technical stages in the NCI/QIN benchmark. In a DCE CCP, QAMPER presented the best repeatability coefficient (RC = 0.56) across test-retest brain metastasis data, out of ten participating DCE software packages. In a DW CCP, QAMPER ranked among the top five (out of fourteen) tools with the highest area under the curve (AUC) for prostate cancer detection. This platform can seamlessly process mpMRI data from brain, head and neck, thyroid, prostate, pancreas, and bladder cancer. MRI-QAMPER prospectively analyzes dose de-escalation trial data for oropharyngeal cancer, which has earned it advanced NCI/QIN approval for expanded usage and applications in wider clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve LoCastro
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.L.); (R.P.); (A.S.K.)
| | - Ramesh Paudyal
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.L.); (R.P.); (A.S.K.)
| | - Amaresha Shridhar Konar
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.L.); (R.P.); (A.S.K.)
| | - Peter S. LaViolette
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA;
| | - Oguz Akin
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (O.A.); (V.H.); (L.H.S.)
| | - Vaios Hatzoglou
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (O.A.); (V.H.); (L.H.S.)
| | - Alvin C. Goh
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.C.G.); (B.H.B.); (R.J.W.)
| | - Bernard H. Bochner
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.C.G.); (B.H.B.); (R.J.W.)
| | - Jonathan Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Richard J. Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.C.G.); (B.H.B.); (R.J.W.)
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Lawrence H. Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (O.A.); (V.H.); (L.H.S.)
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.L.); (R.P.); (A.S.K.)
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (O.A.); (V.H.); (L.H.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Duenweg SR, Bobholz SA, Barrett MJ, Lowman AK, Winiarz A, Nath B, Stebbins M, Bukowy J, Iczkowski KA, Jacobsohn KM, Vincent-Sheldon S, LaViolette PS. T2-Weighted MRI Radiomic Features Predict Prostate Cancer Presence and Eventual Biochemical Recurrence. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4437. [PMID: 37760407 PMCID: PMC10526331 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most diagnosed non-cutaneous cancer in men. Despite therapies such as radical prostatectomy, which is considered curative, distant metastases may form, resulting in biochemical recurrence (BCR). This study used radiomic features calculated from multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) to evaluate their ability to predict BCR and PCa presence. Data from a total of 279 patients, of which 46 experienced BCR, undergoing MP-MRI prior to surgery were assessed for this study. After surgery, the prostate was sectioned using patient-specific 3D-printed slicing jigs modeled using the T2-weighted imaging (T2WI). Sectioned tissue was stained, digitized, and annotated by a GU-fellowship trained pathologist for cancer presence. Digitized slides and annotations were co-registered to the T2WI and radiomic features were calculated across the whole prostate and cancerous lesions. A tree regression model was fitted to assess the ability of radiomic features to predict BCR, and a tree classification model was fitted with the same radiomic features to classify regions of cancer. We found that 10 radiomic features predicted eventual BCR with an AUC of 0.97 and classified cancer at an accuracy of 89.9%. This study showcases the application of a radiomic feature-based tool to screen for the presence of prostate cancer and assess patient prognosis, as determined by biochemical recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savannah R. Duenweg
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA; (S.R.D.); (M.S.)
| | - Samuel A. Bobholz
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | - Michael J. Barrett
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | - Allison K. Lowman
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | - Aleksandra Winiarz
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA; (S.R.D.); (M.S.)
| | - Biprojit Nath
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA; (S.R.D.); (M.S.)
| | - Margaret Stebbins
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA; (S.R.D.); (M.S.)
| | - John Bukowy
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Milwaukee School of Engineering, 1025 N Broadway, Milwaukee, WI 53202, USA
| | - Kenneth A. Iczkowski
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA;
| | - Kenneth M. Jacobsohn
- Department of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | - Stephanie Vincent-Sheldon
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | - Peter S. LaViolette
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA; (S.R.D.); (M.S.)
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang KS, Neelsen CJO, Wennmann M, Glemser PA, Hielscher T, Weru V, Görtz M, Schütz V, Stenzinger A, Hohenfellner M, Schlemmer HP, Bonekamp D. Same-day repeatability and Between-Sequence reproducibility of Mean ADC in PI-RADS lesions. Eur J Radiol 2023; 165:110898. [PMID: 37331287 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess repeatability after repositioning (inter-scan), intra-rater, inter-rater and inter-sequence variability of mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in MRI-detected prostate lesions. METHOD Forty-three patients with suspicion for prostate cancer were included and received a clinical prostate bi-/multiparametric MRI examination with repeat scans of the T2-weighted and two DWI-weighted sequences (ssEPI and rsEPI). Two raters (R1 and R2) performed single-slice, 2D regions of interest (2D-ROIs) and 3D-segmentation-ROIs (3D-ROIs). Mean bias, corresponding limits of agreement (LoA), mean absolute difference, within-subject coefficient of variation (CoV) and repeatability/reproducibility coefficient (RC/RDC) were calculated. Bradley & Blackwood test was used for variance comparison. Linear mixed models (LMM) were used to account for multiple lesions per patient. RESULTS Inter-scan repeatability, intra-rater and inter-sequence reproducibility analysis of ADC showed no significant bias. 3D-ROIs demonstrated significantly less variability than 2D-ROIs (p < 0.01). Inter-rater comparison demonstrated small significant systematic bias of 57 × 10-6 mm2/s for 3D-ROIs (p < 0.001). Intra-rater RC, with the lowest variation, was 145 and 189 × 10-6 mm2/s for 3D- and 2D-ROIs, respectively. For 3D-ROIs of ssEPI, RCs and RDCs were 190-198 × 10-6 mm2/s for inter-scan, inter-rater and inter-sequence variation. No significant differences were found for inter-scan, inter-rater and inter-sequence variability. CONCLUSIONS In a single-scanner setting, single-slice ADC measurements showed considerable variation, which may be lowered using 3D-ROIs. For 3D-ROIs, we propose a cut-off of ∼ 200 × 10-6 mm2/s for differences introduced by repositioning, rater or sequence effects. The results suggest that follow-up measurements should be possible by different raters or sequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Sun Zhang
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Markus Wennmann
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Hielscher
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vivienn Weru
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Magdalena Görtz
- Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Junior clinical cooperation unit 'Multiparametric Methods for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Viktoria Schütz
- Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Hohenfellner
- Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany
| | - David Bonekamp
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany; Heidelberg University Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dwivedi DK, Jagannathan NR. Emerging MR methods for improved diagnosis of prostate cancer by multiparametric MRI. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2022; 35:587-608. [PMID: 35867236 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-022-01031-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Current challenges of using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level-based screening, such as the increased false positive rate, inability to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) with random biopsy, multifocality in PCa, and the molecular heterogeneity of PCa, can be addressed by integrating advanced multiparametric MR imaging (mpMRI) approaches into the diagnostic workup of PCa. The standard method for diagnosing PCa is a transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided systematic prostate biopsy, but it suffers from sampling errors and frequently fails to detect clinically significant PCa. mpMRI not only increases the detection of clinically significant PCa, but it also helps to reduce unnecessary biopsies because of its high negative predictive value. Furthermore, non-Cartesian image acquisition and compressed sensing have resulted in faster MR acquisition with improved signal-to-noise ratio, which can be used in quantitative MRI methods such as dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI. With the growing emphasis on the role of pre-biopsy mpMRI in the evaluation of PCa, there is an increased demand for innovative MRI methods that can improve PCa grading, detect clinically significant PCa, and biopsy guidance. To meet these demands, in addition to routine T1-weighted, T2-weighted, DCE-MRI, diffusion MRI, and MR spectroscopy, several new MR methods such as restriction spectrum imaging, vascular, extracellular, and restricted diffusion for cytometry in tumors (VERDICT) method, hybrid multi-dimensional MRI, luminal water imaging, and MR fingerprinting have been developed for a better characterization of the disease. Further, with the increasing interest in combining MR data with clinical and genomic data, there is a growing interest in utilizing radiomics and radiogenomics approaches. These big data can also be utilized in the development of computer-aided diagnostic tools, including automatic segmentation and the detection of clinically significant PCa using machine learning methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Durgesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, King George Medical University, Lucknow, UP, 226 003, India.
| | - Naranamangalam R Jagannathan
- Department of Radiology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, TN, 603 103, India.
- Department of Radiology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, TN, 600 116, India.
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute Technology Madras, Chennai, TN, 600 036, India.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yuan J, Poon DMC, Lo G. Editorial for "Multi-site concordance of diffusion weighted imaging quantification for assessing prostate cancer aggressiveness". J Magn Reson Imaging 2022; 55:1759-1760. [PMID: 34767691 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Yuan
- Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Darren M C Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Gladys Lo
- Department of Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Diagnostic accuracy of vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS) for the detection of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a meta-analysis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:1396-1405. [PMID: 35181798 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03449-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) was proposed and considered as a standardized reporting criterion for bladder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). VI-RADS could suggest the likelihood of muscle invasion based on the multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) findings which contain five-point scores. The current study is designed to comprehensively and systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of VI-RADS (score 3 and 4) for predicting muscle invasion. METHODS The Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed were searched comprehensively from inception to October 2021. RESULTS Finally, 19 studies incorporating 2900 patients were enrolled. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of VI-RADS 3 for predicting muscle invasion were 0.92 (95%CI 0.89-0.94) and 0.82 (95%CI 0.76-0.87), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of VI-RADS 4 were 0.78 (95%CI 0.72-0.83) and 0.96 (95%CI 0.93-0.97), respectively. And the area under the curve (AUCs) of VI-RADS 3 and 4 were all 0.94 (95%CI 0.92-0.96). No significant publication biases were not observed for VI-RADS 3 (P = 0.74) and 4 (P = 0.57). CONCLUSION The VI-RADS reveals a good diagnostic performance for predicting muscle invasive in bladder cancer, which also has good clinical utilities and applicability. And VI-RADS 3 and 4 as cutoff values provide similar overall diagnostic and could be selectively applied individually. Prospective studies with a large scale are further required to validate the accuracy of the VI-RADS score.
Collapse
|
8
|
Tumor Connectomics: Mapping the Intra-Tumoral Complex Interaction Network Using Machine Learning. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061481. [PMID: 35326634 PMCID: PMC8946165 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The high-level relationships that form complex networks within tumors and between surrounding tissue is challenging and not fully understood. To better understand these tumoral networks, we developed a tumor connectomics framework (TCF) based on graph theory with machine learning to model the complex interactions within and around the tumor microenvironment that are detectable on imaging. The TCF characterization model was tested with independent datasets of breast, brain, and prostate lesions with corresponding validation datasets in breast and brain cancer. The TCF network connections were modeled using graph metrics of centrality, average path length (APL), and clustering from multiparametric MRI with IsoSVM. The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), Area Under the Curve-ROC, and Precision-Recall (AUC-ROC and AUC-PR) were used for statistical analysis. The TCF classified the breast and brain tumor cohorts with an IsoSVM AUC-PR and MCC of 0.86, 0.63 and 0.85, 0.65, respectively. The TCF benign breast lesions had a significantly higher clustering coefficient and degree centrality than malignant TCFs. Grade 2 brain tumors demonstrated higher connectivity compared to Grade 4 tumors with increased degree centrality and clustering coefficients. Gleason 7 prostate lesions had increased betweenness centrality and APL compared to Gleason 6 lesions with AUC-PR and MCC ranging from 0.90 to 0.99 and 0.73 to 0.87, respectively. These TCF findings were similar in the validation breast and brain datasets. In conclusion, we present a new method for tumor characterization and visualization that results in a better understanding of the global and regional connections within the lesion and surrounding tissue.
Collapse
|
9
|
Diffusion Restriction Comparison between Gleason 4 Fused Glands and Cribriform Glands within Patient Using Whole-Mount Prostate Pathology as Ground Truth. Tomography 2022; 8:635-643. [PMID: 35314630 PMCID: PMC8938782 DOI: 10.3390/tomography8020053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence and extent of cribriform patterned Gleason 4 (G4) glands are associated with poor prognosis following radical prostatectomy. This study used whole-mount prostate histology and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) to evaluate diffusion differences in G4 gland morphology. Fourty-eight patients underwent MP-MRI prior to prostatectomy, of whom 22 patients had regions of both G4 cribriform glands and G4 fused glands (G4CG and G4FG, respectively). After surgery, the prostate was sliced using custom, patient-specific 3D-printed slicing jigs modeled according to the T2-weighted MR image, processed, and embedded in paraffin. Whole-mount hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were annotated by our urologic pathologist and digitally contoured to differentiate the lumen, epithelium, and stroma. Digitized slides were co-registered to the T2-weighted MRI scan. Linear mixed models were fitted to the MP-MRI data to consider the different hierarchical structures at the patient and slide level. We found that Gleason 4 cribriform glands were more diffusion-restricted than fused glands.
Collapse
|