Use of a prospective cohort study in the development of a bladder scanning protocol to assist in bladder filling consistency for prostate cancer patients receiving radiation therapy

A Smart Water Bottle and Companion App (HidrateSpark 3) to Improve Bladder-Filling Compliance in Patients With Prostate Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy: Nonrandomized Trial of Feasibility and Acceptability

BACKGROUND

Patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiation therapy (RT) need comfortably full bladders to reduce toxicities during treatment. Poor compliance is common with standard of care written or verbal instructions, leading to wasted patient value (PV) and clinic resources via poor throughput efficiency (TE).

OBJECTIVE

Herein, we assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a smartphone-based behavioral intervention (SBI) to improve bladder-filling compliance and methods for quantifying PV and TE.

METHODS

In total, 36 patients with prostate cancer were enrolled in a single-institution, closed-access, nonrandomized feasibility trial. The SBI consists of a fully automated smart water bottle and smartphone app. Both pieces alert the patient to empty his bladder and drink a personalized volume goal, based on simulation bladder volume, 1.25 hours before his scheduled RT. Patients were trained to adjust their volume goal and notification times to achieve comfortably full bladders. The primary end point was met if qualitative (QLC) and quantitative compliance (QNC) were >80%. For QLC, patients were asked if they prepared their bladders before daily RT. QNC was met if bladder volumes on daily cone-beam tomography were >75% of the simulation's volume. The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire (SUTAQ) was given in person pre- and post-SBI. Additional acceptability and engagement end points were met if >3 out of 5 across 4 domains on the SUTAQ and >80% (15/18) of patients used the device >50% of the time, respectively. Finally, the impact of SBI on PV and TE was measured by time spent in a clinic and on the linear accelerator (linac), respectively, and contrasted with matched controls.

RESULTS

QLC was 100% in 375 out of 398 (94.2%) total treatments, while QNC was 88.9% in 341 out of 398 (85.7%) total treatments. Of a total score of 5, patients scored 4.33 on privacy concerns, 4 on belief in benefits, 4.56 on satisfaction, and 4.24 on usability via SUTAQ. Further, 83% (15/18) of patients used the SBI on >50% of treatments. Patients in the intervention arm spent less time in a clinic (53.24, SEM 1.71 minutes) compared to the control (75.01, SEM 2.26 minutes) group (P<.001). Similarly, the intervention arm spent less time on the linac (10.67, SEM 0.40 minutes) compared to the control (14.19, SEM 0.32 minutes) group (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This digital intervention trial showed high rates of bladder-filling compliance and engagement. High patient value and TE were feasibly quantified by shortened clinic times and linac usage, respectively. Future studies are needed to evaluate clinical outcomes, patient experience, and cost-benefit.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04946214; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04946214.

A prospective comparative study on bladder volume measurement with portable ultrasound scanner and CT simulator in pelvic tumor radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The consistency of bladder volume is very important in pelvic tumor radiotherapy, and portable bladder scanner is a promising device to measure bladder volume. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the bladder volume of patients with pelvic tumor treated with radiotherapy can be accurately measured using the Meike Palm Bladder Scanner PBSV3.2 manufactured in China and the accuracy of its measurement under different influencing factors.

METHODS

A total of 165 patients with pelvic tumor undergoing radiotherapy were prospectively collected. The bladder volume was measured with PBSV3.2 before simulated localization. CT simulated localization was performed when the bladder volume was 200-400ml. The bladder volume was measured with PBSV3.2 immediately after localization and recorded. The bladder volume was then delineated on CT simulation images and recorded. To compare the consistency of CT simulation bladder volume and bladder volume measured by PBSV3.2. To investigate the accuracy of PBSV3.2 in different sex, age, treatment purpose, and bladder volume.

RESULTS

There was a significant positive correlation with bladder volume on CT and PBSV3.2 (r = 0.874; p < 0.001). The mean difference between CT measured values and PBSV3.2 was (-0.14 ± 50.17) ml. The results of the different variables showed that the overall mean of PBSV3.2 and CT measurements were statistically different in the age ≥ 65 years, bladder volumes > 400ml and ≤ 400ml groups (p = 0.028, 0.002, 0.001). There was no statistical significance between the remaining variables. The volume difference between PBSV3.2 measurement and CT was 12.87ml in male patients, which was larger than that in female patients 3.27ml. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the correlation coefficient was 0.473 for bladder volume greater than 400ml and 0.868 for bladder volume less than 400ml; the correlation coefficient of the other variables ranged from 0.802 to 0.893.

CONCLUSION

This is the first large-sample study to evaluate the accuracy of PBSV3.2 in a pelvic tumor radiotherapy population using the convenient bladder scanner PBSV3.2 made in China. PBSV3.2 provides an acceptable indicator for monitoring bladder volume in patients with pelvic radiotherapy. It is recommended to monitor bladder volume with PBSV3.2 when the planned bladder volume is 200-400ml. For male and patients ≥ 65 years old, at least two repeat measurements are required when using a bladder scanner and the volume should be corrected by using a modified feature to improve bladder volume consistency.

Assessment of bladder filling during prostate cancer radiation therapy with ultrasound and cone-beam CT

Prostate cancer patients undergoing external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) benefit from a full bladder to decrease bowel and bladder toxicity. Ultrasound may offer a proxy metric for evaluation, sparing CBCT dosing. Patients were prospectively enrolled pre-simulation from January 2017 to February 2018. Bladder volume was evaluated prior to RT using US daily and CBCT for three daily treatments and then weekly unless otherwise indicated. 29 patients completed median 40 days of RT, resulting in 478 CBCT and 1,099 US bladder volumes. 21 patients were treated to intact glands and 8 to the post-prostatectomy bed. Median patient age was 70 years. Bladder volume on CBCT and US positively correlated (r = 0.85), with average bladder volume for all patients of 162 mL versus 149 mL, respectively. Bladder volume during treatment was consistently lower than the volume at CT simulation (153 mL vs 194 mL, p<0.01) and progressively declined during treatment. Patients older than 70 years presented with lower average bladder volumes than those < 70 years (122 mL vs 208 mL, respectively, p<0.01). Patients with the highest agreement between CBCT and US (<10% variability) had higher average bladder volumes (192 mL vs 120 mL, p=0.01). US was found to be an accurate measure of bladder volume and may be used to monitor daily bladder volumes in patients being treated with radiation for prostate cancer.

[Benefits and limitations of using a portable ultrasound scanner (bladderscan) in pelvic radiotherapy. Narrative review of the literature]

PURPOSE

The reproducibility of bladder filling influences the target volume position for pelvis radiotherapy. The objective of this study was to summarize the current knowledge on the use of portable echograph systems named Bladderscan (BS) in this context.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Review of the PubMed and Google Scholar publication databases was performed between September 2020 and April 2021. Results of this research were filtered in accordance to a set of eligibility criterias and are presented in this article.

RESULTS

Keyword search yielded a total of 2407 publications, which filtered down to 10 relevant articles in accordance to the eligibility criterias. These publications described the viability of the BS measures as well as their clinical and organizational repercussions.

CONCLUSION

According to multiple studies, BS allows to measure the bladder volume before each radiotherapy session. The use of BS decreases the amount of Cone Beam Computer Tomography potentially rejected due to non-conformed bladder filling, and improve the throughput of patients.

Advances in the management of radiation-induced cystitis in patients with pelvic malignancies

OBJECTIVE

Radiotherapy plays a vital role as a treatment for malignant pelvic tumors, in which the bladder represents a significant organ at risk involved during tumor radiotherapy. Exposing the bladder wall to high doses of ionizing radiation is unavoidable and will lead to radiation cystitis (RC) because of its central position in the pelvic cavity. Radiation cystitis will result in several complications (e.g. frequent micturition, urgent urination, and nocturia) that can significantly reduce the patient's quality of life and in very severe cases become life-threatening.

METHODS

Existing studies on the pathophysiology, prevention, and management of radiation-induced cystitis from January 1990 to December 2021 were reviewed. PubMed was used as the main search engine. Besides the reviewed studies, citations to those studies were also included.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

In this review, the symptoms of radiation cystitis and the mainstream grading scales employed in clinical situations are presented. Next, preclinical and clinical research on preventing and treating radiation cystitis are summarized, and an overview of currently available prevention and treatment strategies as guidelines for clinicians is provided. Treatment options involve symptomatic treatment, vascular interventional therapy, surgery, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), bladder irrigation, and electrocoagulation. Prevention includes filling up the bladder to remove it from the radiation field and delivering radiation based on helical tomotherapy and CT-guided 3D intracavitary brachytherapy techniques.

Assessment of an ultrasound bladder scanner in prostate radiotherapy: A validation study and analysis of bladder filling variability

INTRODUCTION

During prostate radiotherapy treatment, it is important to ensure the position of the bladder and prostate is consistent between treatments. The aim of this study was to provide a quantitative basis for incorporating ultrasound bladder volume estimates into local practice for prostate radiotherapy.

METHODS

Agreement between bladder volume estimates obtained using computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound was assessed. Analysis of bladder volumes between planning and treatment scans was used to quantify expected variations in bladder volume over the course of radiotherapy. Dose-volume statistics were estimated and compared to planned dose constraints to propose a target bladder volume and tolerance.

RESULTS

Bladder volume measurements were obtained from 19 radiotherapy patients using ultrasound and CT. Ultrasound underestimated bladder volume compared to CT with a mean bias of -28 ± 30 ml. Pre-treatment (planning) bladder volumes varied from 71 to 383 ml with a mean of 200 ml. Treatment bladder volumes reduced by more than half in 9% of patients during the course of their treatment, potentially leading to a 30% increase in mean bladder dose. Patients with pre-treatment bladder volumes < 200 ml were most likely to exhibit differences in bladder volume, resulting in 'out of tolerance' increases in dose.

CONCLUSIONS

A pragmatic individualised drinking protocol, aimed at achieving a minimum ultrasound bladder volume of 200 ml at planning CT, may be beneficial to reproducibility in radiotherapy treatment. Ultrasound measurements prior to treatment should ideally confirm that bladder volume is at least half the volume measured at planning.

Retrospective evaluation of planning margins for patients undergoing radical radiation therapy treatment for bladder cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy and cone beam computed tomography

INTRODUCTION

Current contouring guidelines for curative radiation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) recommend margins of 1.5-2.0 cm, applied to the clinical target volume (CTV). This study assessed whether the use of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and strict bladder preparation allowed for a reduced planning target volume (PTV) expansion, resulting in lower doses to surrounding organs at risk (OARs).

METHODS

Daily CBCT images for 12 patients (382 scans total) were retrospectively reviewed against four potential PTV margins created on and exported with the reference CT scan. To form the PTVs, three isotropic expansions of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 cm were applied to the CTV, as well as an anisotropic expansion of 1.5 cm superiorly and 1.0 cm in all other dimensions. Following treatment completion, the CBCTs were visually assessed to determine the margins encapsulating the bladder. For retrospective planning purposes, the 1.0-cm and anisotropic margins were compared with the previously recommended margins to determine differences in OAR doses.

RESULTS

The 0.5-, 1.0- and 1.5-cm isotropic margins (IM) and the anisotropic margin (ANIM) covered the CTV in 46.1, 96.8, 100 and 100% of CBCTs retrospectively. Doses to OARs were significantly lower for the reduced margin plans for the small bowel, rectum and sigmoid.

CONCLUSION

Bladder planning target volumes may be safely reduced. We endorse a PTV margin of 1.0cm anteriorly, posteriorly and inferiorly with 1.0-1.5 cm superiorly for radical whole bladder cases using strict bladder preparation, VMAT and pretreatment CBCTs.

Bladder volume reproducibility after water consumption in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To minimize toxicity due to radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer, high bladder volume reproducibility is essential. Water consumption is often used to increase bladder volume reproducibility, but the optimal amount of water required to be consumed remains unclear. We aimed to analyzed the relationship between water consumption and bladder volume reproducibility in patients undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that assessed bladder volume change after water consumption in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies published from database inception up until July 4, 2020. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies. The outcome was the mean difference (MD) of bladder volume after water consumption, evaluated through meta-analysis using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Ten cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial with a total of 417 patients were included. For 300-400 ml water consumption, the bladder volume MD between during treatment and at computer tomography-simulation (95% confidence interval [CI]) was -11.97 (-51.68 to 27.74), was -45.99 (-82.85 to -9.13) for 500-540 ml water consumption and -45.92 (-78.86 to -12.98) for water consumption until full-bladder sensation was reached.

CONCLUSION

Consuming 300-400 ml of water potentially leads to the best bladder volume reproducibility; moreover, the higher the water consumption volume, the lower the bladder volume reproducibility.

BladderScan Feedback Method in Predicting Bladder Filling for Prostate Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study

Purpose:

Approximately 5%–10% of men who receive prostate cancer radiotherapy will suffer from radiation cystitis. Bladder filling before the administration of radiotherapy results in lower radiation exposure to the bladder. BladderScan, an ultrasound-based bladder volume scanner, has the potential to evaluate bladder volume during radiotherapy; thus, a prospective pilot study was initiated.

Methods:

Eleven men receiving tomotherapy for localized prostate cancer were enrolled. The validity of BladderScan was evaluated by comparing the measurements from BladderScan with the calculated volume from megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT). With a crossover design to compare different methods in bladder filling, the radiotherapy was divided into 2 sequences. Conventional method: the patient was asked to drink water after voiding urine. The amount of water and the duration of waiting were the same as in the setting of the simulation. BladderScan feedback method: the bladder filling procedure depended on the BladderScan measurements.

Results:

There were 314 sets of data from 11 patients. The correlation coefficient between V^BS and V^CT was 0.87, where V^BS is the mean volume of 3 measurements by BladderScan and V^CT is the bladder volume derived from MVCT. The BladderScan feedback method resulted in a significant larger bladder volume than the conventional method, with a mean difference of 36.9 mL. When the failure was defined as V^CT <80% of planned volume, the BladderScan feedback method brought about a relative reduction in the failure rate with an odds ratio of 0.44 and an absolute reduction of 9.1%.

Conclusion:

The accuracy of BladderScan was validated by MVCT in our study. The BladderScan feedback method can help patients fill the bladder adequately, with a larger bladder volume and a lower failure rate.

Maintaining consistent bladder filling during external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer

•

Radiation for prostate cancer is preferably provided with a full urinary bladder.

•

There are discrepancies how well current methods achieve consistent bladder filling.

•

A urinary catheter with a check-valve controlled by a float is under development.

Radiation therapy for patients with prostate cancer is preferably provided with a full urinary bladder. Full bladder can potentially move the small intestine out of the radiation treatment regions, and results in decreased small bowel radiation dose and gastrointestinal toxicity. Maintaining consistent bladder filling during computerized tomography simulation scan used for treatment planning and at daily radiation treatments is challenging. Here we present an in-development urinary catheter with a floating balloon that drains the bladder only when urine reaches to a prespecified level, and review current methods used in clinic to ensure consistent bladder filling. These includes bladder filling protocols, ultrasound scanning and biofeedback techniques.

[Individual control of urine volume to improve stability of bladder volume in radiotherapy of urinary tumor]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the training mode of individual urine volume control, to take indi-vidual expected urine volume as the goal of bladder control in patients with urinary system tumors, and to improve the accuracy of bladder control during radiotherapy by active training of bladder receptivity.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients of urinary system tumors were enrolled from May 2019 to September 2019, of whom, 21 patients had prostate cancer, and 4 had bladder cancer. Training of bladder filling started before CT simulation. The patients were required to take the individual bladder filling as the training goal, and the optimal bladder volume range was suggested to be 200－400 mL. After 2－4 weeks of training, the prescribed volume of the bladder was determined according to the patient's bladder receptivity. The volume of the bladder was measured by images of plain CT and images 8-minutes after intravenous contrast injection. The patient's bladder volume was measured using BladderScan before treatment. CBCT (Cone-beam CT) was performed, and bladder volume was measured before treatment. The bladder volume was measured again using BladderScan after treatment.

RESULTS

The mean bladder volume of simulation (V_CT01) was (262±130) mL, ranging from 78 mL to 505 mL. The mean self-evaluation bladder volume before radiotherapy (V_EVA01) was (238±107) mL, ranging from 100 mL to 400 mL. The mean BladderScan measured volume before radiotherapy (V_BVI01) was (253±123) mL, ranging from 60 mL to 476 mL. The mean cone-beam CT measured volume before radiotherapy (V_CBCT) was (270±120) mL, ranging from 104 mL to 513 mL. There was a correlation between V_EVA01 and V_BVI01, V_CT01 and V_BVI01, V_CT01, and V_BVI01, and there was no significant difference in paired t-test. There was a correlation between differences of self-evaluation bladder volume before radiotherapy(V_EVA01) and simulation CT (V_CT01) and differences of self-evaluation bladder volume before radiotherapy (V_EVA01) and cone-beam CT (V_CBCT), and there was no significant difference in paired samples by t-test.

CONCLUSION

During radiotherapy for urinary system tumors, such as prostate cancer and bladder cancer, with the assistance of BladderScan, the patients could try to hold their urine moderately according to their conditions, and individualized bladder prescription may be beneficial to achieve stable bladder volume during radiotherapy.

Overview of patient preparation strategies to manage internal organ motion during radiotherapy in the pelvis

Introduction:

Pelvic internal organs change in volume and position during radiotherapy. This may compromise the efficacy of treatment or worsen its toxicity. There may be limitations to fully correcting these changes using online image guidance; therefore, effective and consistent patient preparation and positioning remain important. This review aims to provide an overview of the extent of pelvic organ motion and strategies to manage this motion.

Methods and Materials:

Given the breadth of this topic, a systematic review was not undertaken. Instead, existing systematic reviews and individual high-quality studies addressing strategies to manage pelvic organ motion have been discussed. Suggested levels of evidence and grades of recommendation for each strategy have been applied.

Results:

Various strategies to manage rectal changes have been investigated including diet and laxatives, enemas and rectal emptying tubes and rectal displacement with endorectal balloons (ERBs) and rectal spacers. Bladder-filling protocols and bladder ultrasound have been used to try to standardise bladder volume. Positioning the patient supine, using a full bladder and positioning prone with or without a belly board, has been examined in an attempt to reduce the volume of irradiated small bowel. Some randomised trials have been performed, with evidence to support the use of ERBs, rectal spacers, bladder-filling protocols and the supine over prone position in prostate radiotherapy. However, there was a lack of consistent high-quality evidence that would be applicable to different disease sites within the pelvis. Many studies included small numbers of patients were non-randomised, used less conformal radiotherapy techniques or did not report clinical outcomes such as toxicity.

Conclusions:

There is uncertainty as to the clinical benefit of many of the commonly adopted interventions to minimise pelvic organ motion. Given this and the limitations in online image guidance compensation, further investigation of adaptive radiotherapy strategies is required.

Unforeseen Computed Tomography Resimulation for Initial Radiation Planning: Associated Factors and Clinical Impact

Purpose

Repeat computed tomography (CT) simulation is problematic because of additional expense of clinic resources, patient inconvenience, additional radiation exposure, and treatment delay. We investigated the factors and clinical impact of unplanned CT resimulations in our network.

Methods and Materials

We used the billing records of 18,170 patients treated at 5 clinics. A total of 213 patients were resimulated before their first treatment. The disease site, location, use of 4-dimensional CT (4DCT), contrast, image fusion, and cause for resimulation were recorded. Odds ratios determined statistical significance.

Results

Our total rate of resimulation was 1.2%. Anal/colorectal (P < .001) and head and neck (P < .001) disease sites had higher rates of resimulation. Brain (P = .001) and lung/thorax (P = .008) had lower rates of resimulation. The most common causes for resimulation were setup change (11.7%), change in patient anatomy (9.8%), and rectal filling (8.5%). The resimulation rate for 4DCTs was 3.03% compared with 1.0% for non-4DCTs (P < .001). Median time between simulations was 7 days.

Conclusions

The most common sites for resimulation were anal/colorectal and head and neck, largely because of change in setup or changes in anatomy. The 4DCT technique correlated with higher resimulation rates. The resimulation rate was 1.2%, and median treatment delay was 7 days. Further studies are warranted to limit the rate of resimulation.

Impact of bladder volume on acute genitourinary toxicity in intensity modulated radiotherapy for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of changes in bladder volume during high-dose intensity-modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT) of prostate cancer on acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity and prospectively evaluate a simple biofeedback technique for reproducible bladder filling with the aim of reducing acute GU toxicity.

METHODS

One hundred ninety-three patients were trained via a biofeedback mechanism to maintain a partially filled bladder with a reproducible volume of 200-300 cc at planning CT and subsequently at each fraction of radiotherapy. We prospectively analyzed whether and to what extent the patients' ability to maintain a certain bladder filling influenced the degree of acute GU toxicity and whether cut-off values could be differentiated.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that the ability to reach a reproducible bladder volume above a threshold volume of 180 cc and maintain that volume via biofeedback throughout treatment predicts for a decrease in acute GU toxicity during curative high-dose IMRT of the prostate. Patients who were not able to reach a partial bladder filling to that cut-off value and were not able to maintain a partially filled bladder throughout treatment had a significantly higher risk of developing ≥grade 2 GU acute toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Our results support the hypothesis that a biofeedback training for the patient is an easy-to-apply, useful, and cost-effective tool for reducing acute GU toxicity in high-dose IMRT of the prostate. Patients who are not able to reach and maintain a certain bladder volume during planning and treatment-two independent risk factors-might need special consideration.

A Feasibility Study on the Role of Ultrasound Imaging of Bladder Volume as a Method to Improve Concordance of Bladder Filling Status on Treatment with Simulation

PURPOSE

Accurate positioning of the prostate is of paramount importance to ensure optimal target coverage and normal tissue sparing in stereotactic ablative body radiation when large doses per fraction are delivered with tight margins around the prostate. Bladder and rectal filling play an important part in controlling the accuracy of a patient's setup and therefore the overall toxicities and outcomes. The aim of this study was to establish the value of characterizing patients' bladder filling kinetics at the time of simulation with ultrasound scans so that a predictive model can be used to ensure that a bladder volume at treatment would match at simulation.

METHODS

A prospective trial was conducted in unfavorable risk prostate cancer patients to evaluate the utility of ultrasound bladder monitoring. Thirty patients (n = 30) were enrolled in this study. Patients were required to void before simulation and then were given 500 mL of fluids to drink. Ultrasound measurements of the bladder were documented at 15-minute intervals for up to four measurements before simulation. On treatment, bladder volumes were measured at a single time point; typically, half an hour after the patient voided and consumed 500 mL of fluids. The kinetic model was then used to predict the optimal time to set up the patient for treatment such that the bladder volume at treatment would match the volume at simulation. Every patient had a cone beam computed tomography scan before each fraction to ensure accurate patient positioning before dose delivery. Bladder volumes at treatment were measured and compared with those at simulation on the cone beam computed tomography data sets using MIMVISTA software.

RESULTS

Of 30 patients, 26 were analyzed. The comparison of the bladder contours at treatment compared to simulation yielded a DICE coefficient (similarity) of 0.76 ± 0.11. The largest variation in bladder size was seen in the anterior-posterior direction.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that ultrasound monitoring of the bladder status was a valuable tool in ensuring reproducible bladder filling on treatment. The bladder kinetic model indicated the general time required to achieve optimal bladder filling was 60 minutes after voiding and drinking 500 mL of water.

Use of a prospective cohort study in the development of a bladder scanning protocol to assist in bladder filling consistency for prostate cancer patients receiving radiation therapy

INTRODUCTION

Evidence of variations in bladder filling effecting prostate stability and therefore treatment and side-effects is well established with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This study aimed to increase bladder volume reproducibility for prostate radiation therapy by implementing a bladder scanning (BS) protocol that could assist patients' bladder filling at computed tomography (CT) simulation and treatment.

METHODS

Based on a retrospective review of 524 prostate cancer patients, a bladder volume of 250-350 mL was adopted as 'ideal' for achieving planning dose constraints. A prospective cohort study was conducted to assess the clinical utility of measuring patients' bladder volumes at CT simulation using an ultrasound bladder scanner (Verathon 9400 BladderScan(®)). A revised bladder preparation protocol was utilised by a bladder scan group (BS) and a non-BS group followed the standard departmental bladder preparation protocol. Time and volume data for the BS group (n = 17) were compared with the non-BS group (n = 17).

RESULTS

The BS cohort had a CT bladder volume range of 221-588 mL; mean 379 mL, SD 125 mL. The non-BS group had a larger range: 184-757 mL; mean 373 mL, SD 160 mL (P = 0.9171). There was a positive correlation between CT volume and BS volume in the BS group (r = 0.797; P = 0.0002) although BS volumes were smaller: range 160-420 mL; mean 251 mL; SD 91 mL; P < 0.0001). The maximum bladder volume receiving 50 Gy (V50) from the BS group was 46.4%, mean 24.5%. The maximum bladder V50 from the non-BS group was 50.9%, mean 27.3% (P = 0.5178). Treatment data from weekly cone beam CT scans were also compared over 6 weeks. They were assessed as being a pass if bladder and bowel requirements were acceptable. The BS group proceeded to treatment on the basis of a pass 92.7% of the time, whereas the pass rate for non-BS group was 75%; difference 17.7% (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The BS is a useful tool for achieving consistent, appropriately sized bladder volumes in prostate cancer patients.