Antibodies raised to short synthetic peptides with sequences derived from HIV-1 SF2 gp120 can both neutralize and enhance HIV-1 SF13: a later variant isolated from the same host

In vitro neutralization of low dose inocula at physiological concentrations of a monoclonal antibody which protects macaques against SHIV challenge

BACKGROUND

Passive transfer of antibodies can be protective in the simian human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV)--rhesus macaque challenge model. The human monoclonal antibody IgG1 b12 neutralizes human immunodeficiency type 1 (HIV-1) in vitro and protects against challenge by SHIV. Our hypothesis is that neutralizing antibodies can only completely inactivate a relatively small number of infectious virus.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We have used GHOST cell assays to quantify individual infectious events with HIV-1SF162 and its SHIV derivatives: the relatively neutralization sensitive SHIV(SF162P4) isolate and the more resistant SHIV(SF162P3). A plot of the number of fluorescent GHOST cells with increasing HIV-1SF162 dose is not linear. It is likely that with high-dose inocula, infection with multiple virus produces additive fluorescence in individual cells. In studies of the neutralization kinetics of IgG1 b12 against these isolates, events during the absorption phase of the assay, as well as the incubation phase, determine the level of neutralization. It is possible that complete inactivation of a virus is limited to the time it is exposed on the cell surface. Assays can be modified so that neutralization of these very low doses of virus can be quantified. A higher concentration of antibody is required to neutralize the same dose of resistant SHIV(SF162P3) than the sensitive SHIV(SF162P4). In the absence of selection during passage, the density of the CCR5 co-receptor on the GHOST cell surface is reduced. Changes in the CD4 : CCR5 density ratio influence neutralization.

CONCLUSIONS

Low concentrations of IgG1 b12 completely inactivate small doses of the neutralization resistant SHIV(SF162P3). Assays need to be modified to quantify this effect. Results from modified assays may predict protection following repeated low-dose shiv challenges in rhesus macaques. It should be possible to induce this level of antibody by vaccination so that modified assays could predict the outcome of human trials.

Protection in macaques immunized with HIV-1 candidate vaccines can be predicted using the kinetics of their neutralizing antibodies

BACKGROUND

A vaccine is needed to control the spread of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). An in vitro assay that can predict the protection induced by a vaccine would facilitate the development of such a vaccine. A potential candidate would be an assay to quantify neutralization of HIV-1.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We have used sera from rhesus macaques that have been immunized with HIV candidate vaccines and subsequently challenged with simian human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV). We compared neutralization assays with different formats. In experiments with the standardized and validated TZMbl assay, neutralizing antibody titers against homologous SHIV(SF162P4) pseudovirus gave a variable correlation with reductions in plasma viremia levels. The target cells used in the assays are not just passive indicators of virus infection but are actively involved in the neutralization process. When replicating virus was used with GHOST cell assays, events during the absorption phase, as well as the incubation phase, determine the level of neutralization. Sera that are associated with protection have properties that are closest to the traditional concept of neutralization: the concentration of antibody present during the absorption phase has no effect on the inactivation rate. In GHOST assays, events during the absorption phase may inactivate a fixed number, rather than a proportion, of virus so that while complete neutralization can be obtained, it can only be found at low doses particularly with isolates that are relatively resistant to neutralization.

CONCLUSIONS

Two scenarios have the potential to predict protection by neutralizing antibodies at concentrations that can be induced by vaccination: antibodies that have properties close to the traditional concept of neutralization may protect against a range of challenge doses of neutralization sensitive HIV isolates; a window of opportunity also exists for protection against isolates that are more resistant to neutralization but only at low challenge doses.

HIV blocking antibodies following immunisation with chimaeric peptides coding a short N-terminal sequence of the CCR5 receptor

The chemokine receptor CCR5 is required for cellular entry by many strains of HIV, and provides a potential target for molecules, including antibodies, designed to block HIV transmission. This study investigates a novel approach to stimulate antibodies to CCR5. Rabbits were immunised with chimaeric peptides which encode a short fragment of the N-terminal sequence of CCR5, as well as an unrelated T cell epitope from Tetanus toxoid. Immunisation with these chimaeric peptides generates a strong antibody response which is highly focused on the N-terminal CCR5 sequence. The antibody to the chimaeric peptide containing an N-terminal methionine also recognises the full length CCR5 receptor on the cell surface, albeit at higher concentrations. Further comparison of binding to intact CCR5 with binding to CCR5 peptide suggest that the receptor specific antibody generated represents a very small fragment of the total anti-peptide antibody. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the N-terminal peptide in the context of the intact receptor has a different structure to that of the synthetic peptide. Finally, the antibody was able to block HIV infection of macrophages in vitro. Thus results of this study suggest that N-terminal fragments of CCR5 may provide potential immunogens with which to generate blocking antibodies to this receptor, while avoiding the dangers of including T cell auto-epitopes.

Neutralization kinetics of sensitive and resistant subtype B primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates

The aim of the study was to determine if sensitive and resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) subtype B primary isolates have different neutralization kinetics. Neutralization assays were undertaken where either the time allowed for virus to react with antibodies or the subsequent period of this mixture's exposure to target cells were varied. The relative neutralization sensitivity/resistance is a reproducible property of the isolates. In a minority of combinations, the titre falls exponentially for as long as the free virions are exposed to antibody. In the remainder, neutralization kinetics shows deviations which may be attributed to events occurring after the virus-antibody mixture is added to the target cells: significant neutralization with minimal exposure of the free virions to antibody; a plot where reduction in virus titre is parallel to the duration of the incubation phase of the assay. Neutralization rate constants are similar for primary HIV-1 SF33, HIV-1 SF162, and HIV-1 89.6, reaching 5 x 10(5)-1 x 10(6)/M sec for the monoclonal antibody IgG1 b12. However, although increased antibody levels produced greater reductions in virus titre the rate of neutralization was not proportional to the antibody concentration. Neutralization of either the free virion or cell-associated virus does not correlate with the resistance/sensitivity of primary subtype B isolates. The target cells play an active role, so that in designing neutralization assays with primary isolates of HIV-1, events following the virus-antibody complex binding to the cell surface have to be taken into consideration.

Antibody-dependent enhancement of viral infection: molecular mechanisms and in vivo implications

Besides the common receptor/coreceptor-dependent mechanism of cellular attachment, some viruses rely on antiviral antibodies for their efficient entry into target cells. This mechanism, known as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of viral infection, depends on the cross-linking of complexes of virus-antibody or virus-activated complement components through interaction with cellular molecules such as Fc receptors or complement receptors, leading to enhanced infection of susceptible cells. Recent studies have suggested that additional mechanisms underlie ADE: involvement of complement component C1q and its receptor (Ebola virus), antibody-mediated modulation of the interaction between viral protein and its coreceptor (human immunodeficiency virus) and suppression of cellular antiviral genes by the replication of viruses entering cells via ADE (Ross River virus). Since ADE is exploited by a variety of viruses and has been associated with disease exacerbation, it may have broad relevance to the pathogenesis of viral infection and antiviral strategies.

Significant decrease of the enhancement/neutralization index in HIV patients during highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)

Authors studied the effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on balance of the antibodies that enhance or neutralize growth of HIV-1(IIIB) strain in MT-4 cells in the presence or absence of human complement. Sequential serum samples were collected from 28 patients in advanced stage of HIV disease before and during HAART. The balance of the enhancing and neutralizing antibodies was expressed by an index value (E/N I). Samples with an E/N I of <0.5 (twofold decrease in virus production) were considered as neutralizing, whereas samples with an E/N I>2.0 (twofold increase in virus production) were considered as enhancing. At the beginning of HAART serum samples from eight patients enhanced, and samples from only two patients neutralized the virus in the presence of complement, median (25th-75th percentile) value of E/N I was 1.32 (0.79-2.29). E/N I significantly (P<0.0001) dropped to 0.37 (0.19-0.57) during the follow-up period of 18.5 (10.5-23.5) months under HAART. Similar changes were detected when serum samples were tested with no complement added. The E/N I values were also markedly decreased when cultures inoculated with mixtures of HIV and purified IgG prepared from serum pools taken before and during HAART, respectively, were compared. In the last samples of 20/28 patients, neutralization was measured even in the presence of complement while enhancement was found with none of these samples. These findings suggest that HAART results in disappearance of enhancing antibodies and switches the E/N I toward neutralization.

Inter-subtype cross-neutralizing antibodies recognize epitopes on cell-associated HIV-1 virions

HIV-1 infected individuals with cross-neutralizing antibodies against primary HIV-1 isolates belonging to Group M (envA-H) and O, are identified. To investigate the neutralization-kinetics of primary isolates with these antibodies, different neutralization assay conditions are compared. Each set is summarized as a/b/c where a is the time in hours for which antibody is incubated with virus, b is the time in hours allowed for virus to absorb to cells, c is the total culture period in days, from the cells' first exposure to virus, before antigen production (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) or number of fluorescent cells (GHOST) are measured. In HIV-infected individuals, neutralizing antibodies can be detected against a wide range of primary isolates (Group M; A-H and Group O) in PBMC-assays with short incubation phases (1/2/7 or 1/24/7). If cultures are extended (1/2/14 or 1/24/14), however, neutralization can be lost. In kinetic experiments, neutralization can even be seen without pre-incubation (a=0 hr). This study shows that neutralization of primary HIV isolates by cross-reactive antibodies can continue after the virus has bound to its target cell. This neutralization, however, is not an all or nothing loss in virus infectivity. Most often it leads only to a reduction in viral replication rates.