Acute hepatitis B viral infection in a patient with anti-HBs

The underlying mechanisms for the "simultaneous HBsAg and anti-HBs serological profile"

The course of HBV infection is determined by the interplay between viral replication via HBV protein production and the host's immune response. Therefore, the diagnosis of infection in clinical practice is established by the serological detection of HBV protein products as well as antibodies produced by the host. Although the serological findings for assessing the clinical course of infection are already well established, the expression of viral proteins and the dynamics of antibody production may vary during the natural course of infection. This causes the HBV infection to be occasionally associated with the presence of unusual serologic profiles, which can lead to doubts in the interpretation of results and mistaken serological diagnosis. The simultaneous detection of HBsAg and anti-HBs in the blood stream comprises an atypical serological profile, somewhat incoherent, whose significance can be complicated to establish. Outlined in this article are some immunological and molecular mechanisms which could justify the existence of this profile in which there is a great laboratorial and clinical interest.

Association of concurrent hepatitis B surface antigen and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen with hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (anti-HBs) can exist in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. To date, little is known about the association of concurrent HBsAg and anti-HBs (concurrent HBsAg/ anti-HBs) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical relevance of concurrent HBsAg/anti-HBs with preS deletion mutations and HCC in chronic HBV infection. A total of 755 patients with chronic HBV infection were included consecutively at a tertiary center. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for HCC, and serum HBV DNA was amplified, followed by direct sequencing to detect preS deletions. The prevalence of concurrent HBsAg/anti-HBs was 6.4% (48/755) and all HBVs tested were genotype C. HCC occurred more frequently in the concurrent HBsAg/anti-HBs group than in the HBsAg only group [22.9% (11/48) vs. 7.9% (56/707), P = 0.002]. In multivariate analyses, age >40 years [odds ratio (OR), 14.712; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.365-49.579; P < 0.001], male gender (OR 2.431; 95% CI, 1.226-4.820; P = 0.011), decompensated cirrhosis (OR, 3.642; 95% CI, 1.788-7.421; P < 0.001) and concurrent HBsAg/anti-HBs (OR, 4.336; 95% CI, 1.956-9.613; P < 0.001) were associated independently with HCC. In molecular analysis, preS deletion mutations were more frequent in the concurrent HBsAg/anti-HBs and HCC groups than in the HBsAg without HCC group (42.3% and 32.5% vs. 11.3%; P = 0.002 and 0.012, respectively). In conclusion, concurrent HBsAg/anti-HBs is associated with preS deletion mutations and may be one of the risk factors for HCC in chronic HBV infection with genotype C.

Effect of transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma on recipients' antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B surface antigen status in countries where hepatitis B virus is endemic

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Antibodies to hepatitis B virus (HBV) that are passively acquired through transfusions may lead to confusion and inappropriate clinical decisions. We evaluated the effects of transfusing fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) on serological tests for HBV antibodies in patients without such antibodies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tests for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), and for antibodies to HBV surface antigen (anti-HBs) and HBV core antigen (anti-HBc), were carried out using enzyme immunoassay on the FFP and sera of 50 patients transfused with FFP containing anti-HBs.

RESULTS

After FFP transfusion, the incidences of 'false' positivity for anti-HBs and anti-HBc were 64% (32/50) and 100% (seven of seven), respectively, and of 'false' negativity for HBsAg was 18.8% (three of 16) in previously positive patients. The post-transfusion seropositivity for antibodies results from passive transmission, whereas the inability to detect HBsAg is the result of decreased detectable levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Laboratory staff and clinicians alike should be cautious in interpreting the results of the HBV marker tests in patients who have recently been transfused, and in obtaining specimens for such studies.

Can hepatitis B core antibody positive livers be used safely for transplantation: hepatitis B virus detection in the liver of individuals who are hepatitis B core antibody positive

A major impediment to the wider application of clinical liver transplantation is the paucity of acceptable organs. Most centers refuse organs that come from donors who are hepatitis B core antibody positive because of a fear of transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection to the recipient. The risk related to the use of such donor organs has never been assessed in an ordered manner. The presence or absence of polymerase chain reaction detectable HBV-DNA in liver tissue of individuals undergoing liver biopsy for clinical reasons was assessed in 133 consecutive patients. A total of 8.2% of these livers resulted positive for HBV-DNA; interestingly the rate was higher among those who were hepatitis B surface antibody positive (12.5%) as compared to those without detectable hepatitis B surface antibody (5.7%). These data provide measures of putative risk for HBV infection in liver transplant recipients associated with the use of organs obtained from a hepatitis B core antibody positive donor.