Correlation of HBeAg/anti-HBe, ALT levels, and HBV DNA PCR results in HBsAg-positive patients

Serum HBeAg and HBV DNA levels are not always proportional and only high levels of HBeAg most likely correlate with high levels of HBV DNA: A community-based study

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between quantitative hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels, and to determine whether semiquantitative measurement of HBeAg can indicate the extent of HBV replication in HBeAg-positive subjects in the immune tolerant phase.A cross-sectional, community-based survey was carried out in 12 communities of 2 counties in Zhejiang Province, China. A panel of 788 HBeAg-positive subjects was divided into 4 groups according to HBV DNA level.Groups I (n = 111), II (n = 91), III (n = 124), and IV (n = 462) had HBV DNA levels below 10 copies/mL (PCR undetectable), between 10 and 10 copies/mL (PCR detectable), between 10 and 2 × 10 copies/mL (hybridization detectable), and >2 × 10 copies/mL, respectively. The HBeAg level correlated well with the HBV DNA level (R = 0.658; P < .01) on a log scale. The average HBeAg level in group IV was significantly higher than those in the other 3 groups, and the best HBeAg cut-off value for differentiating group IV from the other 3 groups was 768 S/CO, with a sensitivity of 94.4% and specificity of 91.1%.Semiquantification of HBeAg could indicate a relative HBV DNA level in HBeAg-positive subjects in the immune tolerant phase.

Hepatitis B virus genotypes and precore/core-promoter mutations in Tunisian patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of genotype and precore/core-promoter mutations in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infected individuals in Tunisia.

METHODS

We studied 164 Tunisian patients (38 HBeAg-positive and 126 HBeAg-negative) with chronic HBV infection. Genotypes and precore/core-promoter mutations were studied using Inno-LiPA and Multiplex-PCR and PCR-RFLP methodology.

RESULTS

Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were higher in HBeAg-positive compared with HBeAg-negative patients (p<0.05). Patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B were younger than HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients. The 164 genotypes were distributed as follows: 1 genotype A (0.6%), 1 genotype B (0.6%), 3 genotype C (1.82%), 139 genotype D (84.75%), and 20 mixed genotypes (12.2%). In the precore region (41.5%) of the patients had exclusively PC mutant and (50.9%) had a mixture of wild-type and variant sequences. PC variant was more commonly found in HBeAg-negative patients than in HBeAg-positive patients (94.5% vs. 87.8%), respectively. The mutations in the core promoter were more common in HBeAg-negative patients (65.4%) than in HbeAg-positive patients (18.2%). These results indicate that genotype D is predominant in Tunisia. Precore mutation occurred invariably among HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients, whereas core-promoter mutations were more frequently found in HBeAg-negative patients.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of these mutants may prove useful for clinical evaluation and choice of therapy.

Clinical and serological variation between patients infected with different Hepatitis B virus genotypes

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) has eight genotypes which have distinct geographical distributions. Studies comparing differences in the clinical outcomes of infections caused by strains with genotype-related variations in the HBV genome have largely compared genotypes B and C and genotypes A and D but not all four genotypes. The present study included 196 HBV-infected patients attending an infectious diseases outpatient clinic in Sweden. The age and geographic origin, liver function, HBeAg and anti-HBe status, and the presence or absence of HBV DNA were analyzed for each patient. HBV DNA was detected in 144 patients, and the HBV genotype and the core promoter and precore sequences were determined for the isolates from 101 of these patients. Among the patients who might be considered most likely to be nonviremic, namely, anti-HBe-positive HBV carriers with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, 65% had detectable HBV DNA and were thus viremic. Among the viremic patients, HBeAg-positive patients were more likely to have elevated ALT levels than anti-HBe-positive patients. HBV genotypes A to F were represented in the study, and their distributions coincided accurately with the origin of the patient. A significantly higher number of genotype D-infected patients were anti-HBe positive and had elevated ALT levels (42% of genotype D-infected patients but 0% of patients infected with genotypes B and C). Genotype D strains with mutations in the core promoter and precore regions were significantly correlated with elevated ALT levels in the patients. The differences were not age related. Therefore, in this large-scale cross-sectional study, genotype D appears to be associated with more active disease.

Molecular epidemiology of gibbon hepatitis B virus transmission

Although transmission of human hepatitis B virus (HBV) variants to nonhuman primates is well documented, it remains to be elucidated whether nonhuman primate HBV is transmissible to humans. The prevalence and transmission routes of gibbon HBV were analysed in 101 captive gibbons in Thailand. Approximately 40 % of these animals showed at least one marker of HBV infection; 19 animals were chronic HBV carriers, characterized by elevated levels of alanine amino transferase and the presence of HBV DNA. Some of the chronic animals were found to be anti-HBc (HBV core antigen) negative (4 of 19), while precore promoter point mutations (nt 1762 or 1764) were determined in four animals by RFLP analysis. Phylogenetic tree analysis of the complete surface gene sequences revealed that gibbon viruses clustered separately from hepadnaviruses of other hosts. Evidence for horizontal and vertical transmission in captive gibbons was obtained. HBV DNA was also detected in the saliva of HBV carrier gibbons. Although some of the animal caretakers at the Krabok Koo Wildlife Breeding Centre were found to be chronic HBV carriers, genotype and sequence analysis did not reveal any evidence for zoonotic disease transmission.

Core promoter mutations 3 years after anti-hepatitis B e seroconversion in patients with chronic hepatitis B or hepatitis B and C infection and cancer remission

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the persistence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and the role of HBV core promoter and precore region mutations in 28 young cancer survivor patients with HBV or HBV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, and persistently normal ALT levels, after spontaneous or interferon (IFN)-induced anti-hepatitis B e (HBe) seroconversion.

METHODS

Sera from 15 patients with HBV and 13 with dual HBV-HCV infection were analyzed for the presence of HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA by polymerase chain reaction 3 yr after anti-HBe seroconversion. A total of 21 patients had seroconverted spontaneously and seven did so after IFN treatment. The core promoter and the precore regions were amplified sequenced directly.

RESULTS

Among patients with HBV infection, HBV-DNA was detected in five of nine (55%) with spontaneous anti-HBe and in all six treated patients (p = 0.092). In the coinfected patients, four had cleared both HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA, five were HBV-DNA negative/HCV-RNA positive and four had the reverse viral pattern. Among the 15 patients with persistence of HBV-DNA, a 7-base pair nucleotide deletion in the core promoter (1757-1763) was present in seven of 10 patients with spontaneous and in one of five patients with IFN-induced seroconversion (p = 0.033). The G1896A precore stop codon mutation was never observed. HBV-DNA levels were significantly lower in patients with the core promoter deletion (p = 0.011). The 7-base pair deletion generated a truncated X protein at amino-acid position 132.

CONCLUSIONS

A core promoter deletion after anti-HBe seroconversion was associated with low HBV-DNA levels, probably because of downregulation of pregenomic RNA production and truncation of the X protein. HBV-DNA persistence was a frequent event, even in the absence of active liver disease.

World-wide epidemiology of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B and associated precore and core promoter variants

Hepatitis B is a serious disease that is endemic in many parts of the world. A significant proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) are infected with a variant form of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) which decreases or abolishes the production of hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg). The purpose of this literature review is to describe the epidemiology of HBeAg-negative CHB (e-CHB) worldwide. A literature search was conducted to identify studies pertaining to e-CHB and underlying variants (precore and core promoter). Fifty studies were included in our analysis. The median prevalence of e-CHB among patients with chronic HBV infection was 33% in the Mediterranean, 15% in Asia Pacific, and 14% in the USA and Northern Europe. The pre core stop codon variant was detected in a median of 60% (range 0-100%) of HBeAg-negative patients overall, 92% in the Mediterranean, 50% in Asia Pacific and 24% in the USA and Northern Europe. There were very few data on the prevalence of core promoter variants outside Asia where the median prevalence among HBeAg-negative patients was 77%. This literature review revealed that e-CHB is more common than previously suspected and that it is present worldwide with marked variations in the prevalence of associated HBV variants across different geographical regions. Additional research using population based samples of adequate size based on a consensus definition of e-CHB and using standardized HBV DNA assays is needed to better estimate the true prevalence of e-CHB and its associated HBV variants.

Epidemiology of precore mutants of hepatitis B in the United Kingdom

A point mutation assay was used to study the codon 28 and codon 1 precore mutant status of 310 chronic hepatitis B carriers (82 HBeAg positive and 228 HBeAg negative). Fourteen of 228 (6%) of HBeAg negative carriers had high levels of serum HBV DNA. Nine of these were explained by precore variants, three by core promoter variants, and two were not explained by recognised precore changes. Nested PCR detected serum HBV DNA in 36% (82/228) of HBeAg negative carriers and 63% (52/82) of these had precore variants. Four of 82 (4%) of the HBeAg positive carriers had precore variants, all as mixed mutant/wild type populations and evidence indicated that these carriers were seroconverting. Overall 23% (52/228) of HBeAg negative carriers had both serum HBV DNA and codon 1 or 28 precore mutations. A sexual transmission event from an HBeAg negative carrier with a relatively low serum HBV DNA level (10(4)-10(6) genome copies/ml) and only core promoter mutations was observed. Despite high rates of variant carriage in the antenatal sub-group perinatal transmission was not observed. The results of direct sequencing on 45 carriers validated the point mutation assay and also showed that codon 28 mutations were only seen in carriers with the genotype CCT at codon 15. For the Caucasian population a higher prevalence of codon 28 mutations (13/25 or 52%) than expected was seen. Liver biopsy data indicated that there was no link between the presence or absence of precore mutants and the severity of liver disease.

Dynamic study of HBsAg and HBeAg in saliva samples from patients with hepatitis B infection: diagnostic and epidemiological significance

Analysis of 505 cases history of patients among men with viral hepatitis demonstrates that HBV infected patients represent 68.9% of the total and that a non-parenteral rate of transmission is the most likely means of hepatitis B infection. Saliva and serum testing for the presence of specific HBV markers (HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA) at different phases of the infection process were carried out to review the diagnostic and epidemiological value of saliva samples from patients with acute viral hepatitis B. The frequency of HBsAg detection by Enzyme Immune Assay (EIA) in saliva of patients in acute period was found to correlate with the frequency of its detection in serum. In early convalescence the frequency of detection of that antigen in serum (59.5% of patients) was significantly higher than in saliva (23.8%) (P < 0.001). The frequencies of HBeAg detection by EIA in saliva samples was significantly higher than that in serum samples in both acute phase (84.3% and 28.1% of patients, respectively) and in early convalescence (56.2% and 3.1% of patients, respectively). The study of frequencies of detection of these antigens in the dynamics of the disease up to the total recovery of patients (observations were carried out for the period of 60 days and longer) showed that in most patients there was a faster disappearance HBsAg from saliva than from serum. By the end of second month this antigen was detected in saliva of only 8.3% of patients whereas in serum in the same period HBsAg was detected in 33.3% of patients. HBeAg became undetectable in blood whereas HBs-antigenemia was still pronounced, and a month after the beginning of the disease it was not found in serum specimens. In saliva, HBeAg was detected in 95.8% of patients observed directly after admission. A month after the beginning of the disease it was detected in saliva of 66.7% of patients and, by the end of observation period, in 12.5% of patients recovered from viral hepatitis. HBV DNA revealed by PCR in saliva and serum of HBV-infected patients was detected in acute period not only in serum (84.6% of cases) but also in saliva (46.2% of cases). The data illustrate the diagnostic value of saliva and point to the possible role of saliva as a source of HBV infection.

A survey of liver pathology in needle biopsies from HBsAg and anti-HBe positive individuals

AIMS

To use laboratory data and liver biopsies, prospectively obtained from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti hepatitis B e antigen (anti-HBe) positive patients, for the assessment of: (1) the relation between biopsy length/number of portal tracts and sampling error; (2) the relation between the severity of piecemeal necrosis and the new grading terminology (minimal, mild, moderate, and severe chronic hepatitis); and (3) liver pathology, which has not been studied in patients with this specific serological profile.

METHODS

The study group (n = 174) included 104 patients with normal aminotransferase concentrations and no cases with clinically apparent cirrhosis. The specimen length and number of portal tracts were measured at light microscopy examination. Sampling error analysis was related to the discrepancies between aminotransferase concentrations versus histological grade. Detailed histological scorings were undertaken by the reference pathologist and compared with laboratory and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA precore sequence data.

RESULTS

Sampling error seemed to be a constant feature, even for biopsies > or = 20 mm, but increased dramatically in biopsies < 5 mm long and/or containing less than four portal tracts. Between 25% and 30% of biopsies, graded as "mild" or "moderate" activity showed features of moderate and severe piecemeal necrosis, respectively. Ten per cent of the patients with normal aminotransferase values had stage III-IV hepatic fibrosis, and 20% had piecemeal necrosis. Only cytoplasmic, not nuclear, core antigen expression was a strong predictor of high hepatitis B viraemia. There was no association between precore stop codon mutations, grade/stage of liver disease, and hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) expression.

CONCLUSIONS

The specimen available for light microscopical examination should be > 5 mm long and should contain more than four portal tracts. In addition, the new grading terminology might give the clinician an inappropriately mild impression of the severity of piecemeal necrosis. Furthermore, even in the presence of normal aminotransferase concentrations, considerable liver pathology can be found in 10-20% of HBsAg and anti-HBe positive individuals; such pathology is not associated with the occurrence of precore stop codon mutations.

The clinical utility of viral quantitation using molecular methods

BACKGROUND

The quantitation of viral nucleic acids in biological fluids has become increasingly desirable over the past several years. To this end, a number of quantitative molecular procedures have been developed.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to review the current literature on the molecular techniques used in the quantitation of viral nucleic acids and to assess the appropriateness of these methods for clinical use.

RESULTS

Assays involving both target and signal amplification are now available for the accurate and precise quantitation of viral burden in infected patients. These methods include quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), branched chain signal amplification (bDNA), nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) and the SHARP signal and hybrid capture systems. Our understanding of the natural history and pathogenesis of viruses such as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) may be greatly facilitated by accurate determinations of viral and infected cell burden. Quantitation of viral load in infected individuals may also be useful to assess disease progression, monitor the efficacy of therapy and to predict treatment failure and the emergence of drug-resistant viruses.

CONCLUSION

Precise, accurate and reproducible quantitation of viral load is now feasible. Molecular assays for viral quantitation should have a considerable impact on medical research and clinical care.

Hepatitis B virus strains in Thailand: genomic variants in chronic carriers

Genetic heterogeneity of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been shown to influence the serological pattern and clinical picture in HBV infection. Thailand has a high transmission rate of HBV, but the molecular epidemiology of HBV strains circulating in this region was hitherto unknown. In this study, the HBV strains from 34 Thai HBsAg-positive patients were investigated. In a proportion of these samples, an antigenically important region of the S gene (n = 18), and the pre-S2 and precore genes (n = 15) were sequenced after PCR amplification. Four strains had in-frame deletions of an upstream region of the pre-S2 gene, with all deletions ending at the same nucleotide. In one of three anti-HBe positive strains without a translational stop at codon 28 of the precore gene, there was a one nucleotide insertion in the precore gene. This insertion would cause a frame shift and result in a nonsense protein being expressed, thus providing one explanation for the lack of HBeAg in this patient. Several rare or unique amino acid changes in the region between residues 120 and 161 of the S protein were found. Glycine 145 was changed to alanine in one strain, and this position showed an apparent mixture of glycine and arginine in another. In total, 10 strains displayed unexpected changes that were not related to the normal variability between subtypes or genetic subgroups. It is concluded that there is considerable heterogeneity in HBV strains in Thailand and that this could have clinical and epidemiological importance in a region with high HBV transmission rates.

Laboratory diagnosis of human hepatitis viruses

Conventional serologic methods of antigen or antibody detection are now widely applied for diagnosis of hepatitis viruses A, B, C, and D. Nucleic acid quantitation has become very useful for monitoring response to antiviral therapy in cases of hepatitis B and C. Special confirmatory testing of HCV serologies can be quite specific, but overall serologies for HCV lack sensitivity for early diagnosis. Thus HCV RNA detection may ultimately be the preferred method for HCV diagnosis and for screening blood donors. Unfortunately, HEV diagnosis may rest on the efforts of research laboratories for electron microscopy, Western blot, or nucleic acid detection.