Recovery of hepatitis C specific T-cell responses after rituximab therapy in hepatitis C mixed cryoglobulinemic vasculitis

Recent updates in the diagnosis and management of cryoglobulinemic vasculitis

INTRODUCTION

Cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CV), also known as mixed cryoglobulinemic syndrome (MCS), is a systemic vasculitis that affects small blood vessels. It exhibits a wide range of clinical manifestations, making its treatment a continuing challenge for physicians.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a comprehensive review to evaluate the current status of diagnosis, management, and treatment of mixed cryoglobulinemia (MC). The accurate clinical and serological evaluation plays a vital role in diagnosing MC, identifying potential comorbidities, and monitoring its main manifestations and complications. Treatment strategies should be individualized based on the underlying etiopathogenesis, the severity of organ involvement, and the associated underlying disease. At present, the two mainstays of CV treatment are direct antiviral agents (for HCV-related CV) and B-cell-targeted therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

MC remains one of the few autoimmune diseases where the etiology is known, at least for the majority of patients. Its pathogenetic mechanism offers a unique opportunity to investigate the interplay between infections and the immune system. Moving forward, the primary challenge will continue to lie in the treatment of resistant or refractory cases of CV, particularly those associated with autoimmune diseases, or cases classified as 'essential' CV.

Hepatitis C: clinical management and debated issues

Hepatitis C virus represents an important global health issue with 71 million of infected people in the word. Direct-acting antivirals are quite new molecules that hit specific Hepatitis C virus proteins useful for viral replication and assembly. Notably, Direct-acting antivirals bring to high sustained virological response rates showing also a great safety profile. This treatment revolution had an impact on transplantation world, in fact the number of liver transplants due to Hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma is quickly decreasing. Even if this therapy has achieved excellent results in terms of morbility and mortality rates' reduction, there are some debated issues to consider. In the present review the main clinical challenges in every-day management of Hepatitis C virus patients treated with Direct-acting antivirals and the debated effects of viral clearance (metabolic, cardiovascular, immunologic and neoplastic) are discussed. The detection of barriers that can preclude the delivery of Hepatitis C virus care, is the most complex challenge for the scientific community. To obtain the Hepatitis C virus global eradication by 2030, as the World Health Organization has set, will be complex and laborious and will need a further multilevel effort.

Lymphocyte Landscape after Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Cure: The New Normal

Chronic HCV (CHC) infection is the only chronic viral infection for which curative treatments have been discovered. These direct acting antiviral (DAA) agents target specific steps in the viral replication cycle with remarkable efficacy and result in sustained virologic response (SVR) or cure in high (>95%) proportions of patients. These treatments became available 6–7 years ago and it is estimated that their real impact on HCV related morbidity, including outcomes such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), will not be known for the next decade or so. The immune system of a chronically infected patient is severely dysregulated and questions remain regarding the immune system’s capacity in limiting liver pathology in a cured individual. Another important consequence of impaired immunity in patients cleared of HCV with DAA will be the inability to generate protective immunity against possible re-infection, necessitating retreatments or developing a prophylactic vaccine. Thus, the impact of viral clearance on restoring immune homeostasis is being investigated by many groups. Among the important questions that need to be answered are how much the immune system normalizes with cure, how long after viral clearance this recalibration occurs, what are the consequences of persisting immune defects for protection from re-infection in vulnerable populations, and does viral clearance reduce liver pathology and the risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma in individuals cured with these agents. Here, we review the recent literature that describes the defects present in various lymphocyte populations in a CHC patient and their status after viral clearance using DAA treatments.