The association between famotidine and in-hospital mortality of patients with COVID-19

Long COVID as a disease of accelerated biological aging: An opportunity to translate geroscience interventions

It has been four years since long COVID-the protracted consequences that survivors of COVID-19 face-was first described. Yet, this entity continues to devastate the quality of life of an increasing number of COVID-19 survivors without any approved therapy and a paucity of clinical trials addressing its biological root causes. Notably, many of the symptoms of long COVID are typically seen with advancing age. Leveraging this similarity, we posit that Geroscience-which aims to target the biological drivers of aging to prevent age-associated conditions as a group-could offer promising therapeutic avenues for long COVID. Bearing this in mind, this review presents a translational framework for studying long COVID as a state of effectively accelerated biological aging, identifying research gaps and offering recommendations for future preclinical and clinical studies.

Effectiveness of famotidine on the risk of poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19: A nationwide cohort study in Korea

Objective

Famotidine has been proposed as a promising candidate for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, there is limited research on the association of famotidine with the poor prognosis of COVID-19.

Methods

The Korean nationwide cohort included 6,556 patients who tested positive on RT-PCR for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The poor COVID-19-related outcomes were defined on the basis of having encountered the composite outcome of high oxygen therapy, intensive care unit admission, administration of mechanical ventilation, or death. In addition, we performed exposure-driven propensity score matching for no H₂-blocker use versus current famotidine use, and other H₂-blocker use versus current famotidine use.

Results

4,785 (73.0%) patients did not use a H₂-blocker, 393 (6.0%) patients were currently used famotidine, and 1,292 (19.7%) patients currently used H₂-blocker other than famotidine. In multivariable analysis after matching (no H₂-blocker use versus current famotidine use), there was no significant association between current famotidine use and composite outcomes (adjusted odd ratios [aOR]: 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-3.06). On the other hand, another matched cohort (other H₂-blocker use versus current famotidine use), demonstrated a positive association between current famotidine use and composite outcomes (aOR: 3.56, 95% CI: 1.03-12.28).

Conclusions

Our study results did not support the potential of famotidine as a therapeutic agent for COVID-19. A rather unexpected result could be observed in the comparisons between current famotidine use and other H₂-blocker use; it was observed that current famotidine use increased the risk of poor COVID-19 related outcomes. Further studies are needed to clearly prove the causal relationship with several H2-blockers, including famotidine.

The Anti-Histamine Azelastine, Identified by Computational Drug Repurposing, Inhibits Infection by Major Variants of SARS-CoV-2 in Cell Cultures and Reconstituted Human Nasal Tissue

Background and purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose challenges, especially with the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants that are associated with higher infectivity and/or compromised protection afforded by the current vaccines. There is a high demand for additional preventive and therapeutic strategies effective against this changing virus. Repurposing of approved or clinically tested drugs can provide an immediate solution.

Experimental Approach: We applied a novel computational approach to search among approved and commercially available drugs. Antiviral activity of a predicted drug, azelastine, was tested in vitro in SARS-CoV-2 infection assays with Vero E6 cells, Vero cells stably overexpressing the human TMPRSS2 and ACE2 proteins as well as on reconstituted human nasal tissue using the predominant variant circulating in Europe in summer 2020, B.1.177 (D614G variant), and its emerging variants of concern; B.1.1.7 (alpha), B.1.351 (beta) and B.1.617.2 (delta) variants. The effect of azelastine on viral replication was assessed by quantification of viral genomes by droplet digital PCR or qPCR.

Key results: The computational approach identified major drug families, such as anti-infective, anti-inflammatory, anti-hypertensive, antihistamine, and neuroactive drugs. Based on its attractive safety profile and availability in nasal formulation, azelastine, a histamine 1 receptor-blocker was selected for experimental testing. Azelastine reduced the virus-induced cytopathic effect and SARS-CoV-2 copy numbers both in preventive and treatment settings upon infection of Vero cells with an EC₅₀ of 2.2–6.5 µM. Comparable potency was observed with the alpha, beta and delta variants. Furthermore, five-fold dilution (containing 0.02% azelastine) of the commercially available nasal spray formulation was highly potent in inhibiting viral propagation in reconstituted human nasal tissue.

Conclusion and Implications: Azelastine, an antihistamine available as nasal sprays developed against allergic rhinitis may be considered as a topical prevention or treatment of nasal colonization by SARS-CoV-2. A Phase 2 efficacy indicator study with azelastine-containing nasal spray that was designed based on the findings reported here has been concluded recently, confirming accelerated viral clearance in SARS-CoV-2 positive subjects.

Experimental Search for New Means of Pathogenetic Therapy COVID-19: Inhibitor of H2-Receptors Famotidine Increases the Effect of Oseltamivir on Survival and Immune Status of Mice Infected by A/PR/8/34 (H1N1)

The development of drugs for the therapy of COVID-19 is one of the main problems of modern physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology. Taking into account the available information on the participation of mast cells and the role of histamine in the pathogenesis of COVID-19, as well as information on the positive role of famotidine in the prevention and treatment of coronavirus infection, an experiment was carried out using famotidine in a mouse model. We used a type A/PR/8/34 (H1N1) virus adapted to mice. The antiviral drug oseltamivir (Tamiflu), which belongs to the group of neuraminidase inhibitors, was used as a reference drug. The use of famotidine in combination with oseltamivir can increase survival, improve the dynamics of animal weight, reduce the level of NKT cells and increase the level of naive T-helpers. Further studies of famotidine in vivo should be aimed at optimizing the regimen of drug use at a higher viral load, as well as with a longer use of famotidine.

The association of statins use with survival of patients with COVID-19

Background

Statins are frequently prescribed for patients with dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus. These comorbidities are highly prevalent in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Statin's beneficial effect on mortality in COVID-19 infection has been reported in several studies. However, these findings are still inconclusive.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational study among 6,095 patients with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 hospitalized in Mount Sinai Health System between March 1st 2020 and May 7th 2020. Patients were stratified into two groups: statin use prior to or during hospitalization (N = 2,423) versus no statins (N = 3,672). We evaluated in-hospital mortality as a primary outcome using propensity score matching and inverse probability treatment weighted (IPTW) analysis. In additional analysis, we compared continuous use of statins (N = 1,108) with no statins, continuous use of statins with discontinuation of statins (N = 644), and discontinuation of statins with no statins.

Results

Among 6,095 COVID-19 patients, statin use prior to or during hospitalization group were older (70.8 ± 12.7 years versus 59.2 ± 18.2 years, p<0.001) and had more comorbidities compared to no statins group. After matching by propensity score (1,790 pairs), there were no significant differences in-hospital mortality between patients with statins and those without [28.9% versus 31.0%, p = 0.19, odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91 (0.79–1.05)]. This result was confirmed by IPTW analysis [OR (95% CI): 0.96 (0.81–1.12), p = 0.53]. In the additional analysis comparing continuous use of statins with no statins group, in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in continuous use of statins compared to no statins group [26.3% versus 34.5%, p<0.001, OR (95% CI): 0.68 (0.55–0.82)] after matching by propensity score (944 pairs), as well as IPTW analysis [OR (95% CI): 0.77 (0.64–0.94), p = 0.009]. Finally, comparison of continuous use of statins with discontinuation of statins showed lower in-hospital mortality in continuous use of statins group [27.9% versus 42.1%, p<0.001, OR (95% CI): 0.53 (0.41–0.68)].

Conclusions

Use of statins prior to or during hospitalization was not associated with a decreased risk of in-hospital mortality, however, continuous use of statins was associated with lower in-hospital mortality compared to no statin use and discontinuation of statins.

The association of anticoagulation before admission and survival of patients with COVID-19

Background

Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with systematic coagulopathy which might result in fatality. We aimed to investigate whether systematic anticoagulation before admission with COVID infection was associated with patients’ survival.

Methods

We reviewed medical records of 6,095 hospitalized patients with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 from the Mount Sinai Health System. Patients were stratified into two groups: patients with therapeutic anticoagulation before admission (7.9%, N=480), or those without (92.1%, N=5,615). Propensity score matched analysis was conducted to assess the association of anticoagulation before admission and in-hospital mortality (N=296 in each group). Multiple imputation for missing data was conducted.

Results

A total of 480 patients (7.9%) received anticoagulation before admission. Patients with anticoagulation before admission were older (72.1±14.7 years vs. 63.1±17.2 years), and had more comorbidities including chronic pulmonary obstructive disease, hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure (all p< 0.05). Notably, patients with anticoagulation before admission had lower D-dimer [1.48 (IQR 0.75, 2.79) μg/mL vs 1.66 (0.89, 3.52) μg/mL, p=0.002]. In a propensity score matched analysis (N=296 in each group), in-hospital mortality was not significantly different in patients with anticoagulation before admission compared to those without (28.4% vs 31.1%, p=0.53). In addition, inverse probability weighted analysis and multiple imputation for missing data did not change the result. Furthermore, these differences were not significant after excluding endotracheal intubation from both groups.

Conclusion

Anticoagulation before admission was not associated with lower risk of in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients. Further investigation is needed to confirm these findings.

The association between famotidine and in-hospital mortality of patients with COVID-19

Famotidine has been considered to be a potential treatment for COVID‐19 but the current data is conflicting. This retrospective study was conducted by utilizing data of 9565 COVID‐19 hospitalized patients. Patients treated with and without famotidine were matched by propensity score using a 1:1 matching scheme. A total of 1593 patients (16.7%) received famotidine. In‐hospital mortality was similar in patients treated with and without famotidine in the propensity‐matched cohorts (28.3% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.97), which remains similar irrespective of severity or concomitant treatment by steroids. Famotidine treatment was not associated with a lower risk of in‐hospital mortality of COVID‐19 patients.