Pulse versus Non-pulse Steroid Regimens in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy and the risk of in-hospital mortality among acute COVID-19 patients: Nationwide clinical cohort study

BACKGROUND

Steroids are widely used to modulate the inflammatory reactions associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, the optimal upper limit dose of steroid use for acute COVID-19 care remains unclear and currently available data may suffer from a time-dependent bias of no effectiveness or reversed causation given the desperate situation of treatment during this pandemic. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to elucidate the impact of intravenous pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (500 mg or greater per day) on the risk of in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19 by controlling for time-dependent bias.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study with 67,348 hospitalised acute COVID-19 patients at 438 hospitals during 2020-2021 in Japan. The impact of intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy on the risk of in-hospital mortality was examined based on hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), with stratification according to the status of invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV). Time-dependent bias was controlled for in a marginal structural model analysis, with reference to patients without methylprednisolone therapy.

RESULTS

During the study period, 2400 patients died. In-hospital mortality rates of iMV-free patients without or with methylprednisolone pulse therapy were 2.3% and 19.5%, and the corresponding values for iMV-receiving patients were 24.7% and 28.6%, respectively. The marginal structural model analysis showed that intravenous pulse therapy with methylprednisolone was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality among patients receiving-iMV (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.52-0.68). In contrast, pulse therapy with methylprednisolone increased the risk of in-hospital mortality among iMV-free patients (HR 3.38; 95% CI 3.02-3.79). The benefits of pulse therapy for iMV-receiving patients were greater than in those treated with intermediate/higher doses (40-250 mg intravenously) of methylprednisolone (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.71-0.89).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest that intravenous methylprednisolone showed dose-response efficiencies, and pulse therapy may benefit critically ill patients with acute COVID-19, such as those requiring iMV.

Timeline of Oxygen Demand in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia

Objective In patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), understanding the timeline of oxygen demand and severe respiratory failure, such as intensive care unit (ICU) admission, may clarify the therapeutic window when home-care treatment is possible and help determine the timing of treatment in hospitalized patients to improve the respiratory status. We examined the timeline of respiratory status in hospitalized patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 in terms of oxygen demand and ICU admission. Methods We retrospectively assessed all patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to our hospital between February 2020 and February 2021 and required supplemental oxygen. This study included 66 patients who were transferred to the ICU (ICU patients) and 144 patients who were not transferred to the ICU (non-ICU patients). Results In the total cohort, the median duration from symptom onset to the need for supplemental oxygen was 8 [interquartile range (IQR) 6-10] days. This duration was significantly shorter in ICU patients than in non-ICU patients [8 (IQR 6-9) vs. 9 (IQR 6-10) days, p=0.02]. The median duration from symptom onset to ICU admission was 9 (IQR 8-11) days in severely ill patients. The median duration from the initiation of supplemental oxygen to ICU admission was 1.0 (IQR 1-2.75) days. Only 2 of 66 patients (3.0%) were admitted to the ICU six days or later after the initiation of supplemental oxygen. Conclusion Physicians should carefully monitor each patient's condition after eight days from symptom onset. New therapies and their early administration are needed to reduce the frequency of respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients.

Corticosteroids use for COVID-19: an overview of systematic reviews

PURPOSE

A reappraisal of the validity of the conclusions of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses related to corticosteroids use for the treatment of COVID-19.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An overview of SRs (umbrella review). The methodological quality of the SRs was assessed using tha AMSTAR-2 checklist; quality of the evidence was appraised following the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

35 SRs were included in this overview. Data were from 307 overlapping reports, based on 121 individual primary studies (25 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), 96 non-RCTs. In critically ill patients the use of steroids significantly reduced mortality compared to standard of care in 80% of the SRs, more often with moderate/high level of certainty; however, in patients not requiring oxygen supplementation the use of steroids increased the overall mortality in 2/3 of the comparisons. Clinical progression of diseases (need for mechanical ventilation, or for intensive care admission) was more commonly observed among controls compared to steroids recipients (in 9 out of 14 comparisons; certainty of evidence from very-low to moderate). The occurrence of adverse events was similar among steroids recipients and controls. Other outcomes (i.e., viral clearance, length of hospital stay) or issue related to optimal dose and type of steroids were addressed in a minority of SRs, with a high level of uncertainty, so that no definitive conclusions can be drawn.

CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate certainty of evidence that corticosteroids reduce mortality and progression of disease in critically ill COVID-19 patients compared to standard of care, without increasing the occurrence of adverse events.