The tenth annual amygdala, stress, and PTSD conference: "The amygdala: Dysfunction, hyperfunction, and connectivity"

Can oxytocin inhibit stress-induced hyperalgesia?

Stress-induced hyperalgesia is a problematic condition that lacks an effective therapeutic measure, and hence impairs health-related quality of life. The regulation of stress by oxytocin (OT) has overlapping effects on pain. OT can alleviate pain directly mainly at the spinal level and the peripheral tissues. Additionally, OT plays an analgesic role by dealing with stress and fear learning. When OT relieves stress by targeting the prefrontal brain regions and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, the body's sensitivity to pain is attenuated. Meanwhile, OT facilitates fear learning and may, in turn, enhance the anticipatory actions to painful stimulation. The unique therapeutic value of OT in patients suffering from stress and stress-related hyperalgesia conditions is worth considering. We reviewed recent advances in animal and human studies involving the effects of OT on stress and pain, and discussed the possible targets of OT within the descending and ascending pathways in the central nervous system. This review provides an overview of the evidence on the role of OT in alleviating stress-induced hyperalgesia.

Left, right, or bilateral amygdala activation? How effects of smoothing and motion correction on ultra-high field, high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data alter inferences

Given the amygdala's role in survival mechanisms, and its pivotal contributions to psychological processes, it is no surprise that it is one of the most well-studied brain regions. One of the common methods for understanding the functional role of the amygdala is the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). However, fMRI tends to be acquired using resolutions that are not optimal for smaller brain structures. Furthermore, standard processing includes spatial smoothing and motion correction which further degrade the resolution of the data. Inferentially, this may be detrimental when determining if the amygdalae are active during a task. Indeed, studies using the same task may show differential amygdala(e) activation. Here, we examine the effects of well-accepted preprocessing steps on whole-brain submillimeter fMRI data to determine the impact on activation patterns associated with a robust task known to activate the amygdala(e). We analyzed 7T fMRI data from 30 healthy individuals collected at sub-millimeter in-plane resolution and used a field standard preprocessing pipeline with different combinations of smoothing kernels and motion correction options. Resultant amygdalae activation patterns were altered depending on which combination of smoothing and motion correction were performed, indicating that whole-brain preprocessing steps have a significant impact on the inferences that can be drawn about smaller, subcortical structures like the amygdala.