Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation

Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty: Analysis of risk factors and preventive options

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful elective operations in orthopedic surgery for improving pain and functional disability in patients with end-stage joint disease. However, dislocation continues to be a troublesome complication after THA, as it is a leading cause of revision and is associated with substantial social, health, and economic costs. It is a relatively rare, usually early occurrence that depends on both the patients' characteristics and the surgical aspects. The most recent and important finding is the special attention to be given preoperatively to spinopelvic mobility, which is closely related to the incidence of dislocation. Consequently, clinical and radiographic assessment of the lumbar spine is mandatory to identify an altered pelvic tilt that could suggest a different positioning of the cup. Lumbar spinal fusion is currently considered a risk factor for dislocation and revision regardless of whether it is performed prior to or after THA. Surgical options for its treatment and prevention include the use of prostheses with large diameter of femoral head size, dual mobility constructs, constrained liners, and modular neck stems.

Anatomical cup implantation assisted with dynamic 3D planning improves functional outcomes in primary total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Anatomical cup implantation is a promising approach in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and improves functional outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the cup position and functional outcomes in primary THA with preoperative dynamic 3D planning.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 54 hips in 48 patients who underwent primary THA with anatomical cup implantation (mean follow-up time: 52 months). Cup positions were evaluated based on patient-specific morphology, the acetabular fossa and the combined anteversion test. Functional outcomes were assessed after THA. The paired-sample t-test was performed for surgical and contralateral native hips among 42 patients who underwent unilateral THA.

RESULTS

Two hips suffered intraoperative trochanteric fracture, but no hip dislocations occurred. No patients reported groin or thigh pain, and all patients were capable of deep squatting and one-leg standing. The mean Harris hip score, WOMAC score, and physical SF-36 score were 94.46 ± 6.16, 10.41 ± 3.62, and 95.19 ± 8.74, respectively. Except for acetabular offset, THA restored biomechanics to those of contralateral native hip, including cup anteversion, abduction, femoral offset and acetabular height (P> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study provided evidence for the application of anatomical cup implantation assisted with dynamic 3D planning in primary THA, which restored morphology and improved functional outcomes.

Simulating movements of daily living in robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty with 3D modelling

Aims

Computer-assisted 3D preoperative planning software has the potential to improve postoperative stability in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Commonly, preoperative protocols simulate two functional positions (standing and relaxed sitting) but do not consider other common positions that may increase postoperative impingement and possible dislocation. This study investigates the feasibility of simulating commonly encountered positions, and positions with an increased risk of impingement, to lower postoperative impingement risk in a CT-based 3D model.

Methods

A robotic arm-assisted arthroplasty planning platform was used to investigate 11 patient positions. Data from 43 primary THAs were used for simulation. Sacral slope was retrieved from patient preoperative imaging, while angles of hip flexion/extension, hip external/internal rotation, and hip abduction/adduction for tested positions were derived from literature or estimated with a biomechanical model. The hip was placed in the described positions, and if impingement was detected by the software, inspection of the impingement type was performed.

Results

In flexion, an overall impingement rate of 2.3% was detected for flexed-seated, squatting, forward-bending, and criss-cross-sitting positions, and 4.7% for the ankle-over-knee position. In extension, most hips (60.5%) were found to impinge at or prior to 50° of external rotation (pivoting). Many of these impingement events were due to a prominent ischium. The mean maximum external rotation prior to impingement was 45.9° (15° to 80°) and 57.9° (20° to 90°) prior to prosthetic impingement. No impingement was found in standing, sitting, crossing ankles, seiza, and downward dog.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that positions of daily living tested in a CT-based 3D model show high rates of impingement. Simulating additional positions through 3D modelling is a low-cost method of potentially improving outcomes without compromising patient safety. By incorporating CT-based 3D modelling of positions of daily living into routine preoperative protocols for THA, there is the potential to lower the risk of postoperative impingement events.

Laser projector method for measuring postoperative acetabular anteversion after total hip replacement

INTRODUCTION

For patients undergoing THR, measuring the postoperative acetabular anteversion precisely plays a pivotal role in the prognosis. However, using elliptical methods mandates computerized equipment that is frequently in shortage in remote areas and developing countries. We invented a laser projector utilizing the ellipse method to measure the acetabular anteversion directly. The aim is to examine the consistency and validity of the laser projector as compared to our original software, Elliversion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected 50 postoperative pelvis radiographs including acetabulum from our institution. One investigator first measured the anteversion of included radiographs through Elliversion software as the control group. Subsequently, two operators independently used the laser projector for measurements in two separate periods with 1-day intervals as the experimental group. Our analysis was comprised of intra- and inter-observer comparisons and reliability, which investigated both the consistency and validity, by using two-sample student's t-test and intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in measuring the anteversion through laser projectors between two operators (p = 0.54), with excellent inter-observer reliability (ICC, 0.967). The estimated effect in the anteversion measurement between the Elliversion and laser projector was also comparable, with the ICC level of 0.984, indicating excellent reliability.

CONCLUSION

Our study reported the consistency and validity of this laser projector as there is no significant difference between Elliversion and Laser projector, notably with excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability. We look forward to helping elevate clinical acumen when doctors provide care to patients after THR, especially in remote areas.

Femoral stem neck geometry determines hip range of motion shape : a computer simulation study

AIMS

In computer simulations, the shape of the range of motion (ROM) of a stem with a cylindrical neck design will be a perfect cone. However, many modern stems have rectangular/oval-shaped necks. We hypothesized that the rectangular/oval stem neck will affect the shape of the ROM and the prosthetic impingement.

METHODS

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) motion while standing and sitting was simulated using a MATLAB model (one stem with a cylindrical neck and one stem with a rectangular neck). The primary predictor was the geometry of the neck (cylindrical vs rectangular) and the main outcome was the shape of ROM based on the prosthetic impingement between the neck and the liner. The secondary outcome was the difference in the ROM provided by each neck geometry and the effect of the pelvic tilt on this ROM. Multiple regression was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

The stem with a rectangular neck has increased internal and external rotation with a quatrefoil cross-section compared to a cone in a cylindrical neck. Modification of the cup orientation and pelvic tilt affected the direction of projection of the cone or quatrefoil shape. The mean increase in internal rotation with a rectangular neck was 3.4° (0° to 7.9°; p < 0.001); for external rotation, it was 2.8° (0.5° to 7.8°; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows the importance of attention to femoral implant design for the assessment of prosthetic impingement. Any universal mathematical model or computer simulation that ignores each stem's unique neck geometry will provide inaccurate predictions of prosthetic impingement. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(12):780-789.

Measuring Acetabular Version after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Two Radiographic Methods

Objective  The objective of the present work was to compare the measurement of acetabular component version on anteroposterior (AP) and on cross-table radiographs after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods  Radiographs of 60 hips with a primary THA were selected. Version was calculated on the AP radiograph using the Lewinnek method and, on the cross-table, using the Woo and Morrey direct method.

Results  Mean and standard deviation (SD) were different on both radiographs, being 9.7° ± 5.5° on the AP, whereas in the cross-table the measurements were 20.6° ± 8.4° ( p  < 0.001). Minding our aim of 10°, the cross-table measurements were statistically different from it ( p  < 0.001), while the AP measurement did not differ ( p  = 0.716).

Conclusion  The present study showed that the best way to correctly evaluate the acetabular component positioning following a THA is by measuring anteversion and abduction on an AP radiograph after confirming, in a cross-table radiograph, that the component is not retroverted.

Orthostatic retractor placement reduces operating time and post-operative inflammatory response during the learning curve of anterior approach THA

Introduction

Handheld retractor placement (HHRP) is prone to repetitive repositioning. This could lead to muscle damage especially during a procedure with a steep learning curve. In an attempt to minimize retractor repositioning during the learning curve of direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA), we used a table mounted orthostatic retractor placement (ORP) device.

Purpose

To investigate whether ORP would reduce the extent of muscle damage, OR-time and post-operative inflammatory response.

Materials and methods

29 Patients were operated by 2 surgeons who randomly used HHRP or ORP during their learning curve of DAA THA. There were 14 patients in a control group who were operated by an experienced surgeon. Blood levels of Creatine Kinase (CK), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) were measured at 1 h pre- and 24 and 48 h post-operatively.

Results

The mean OR-time was 67 and 50 min in the HHRP and ORP cohort, respectively (p < 0,001). Post-operative CRP levels were significantly higher in the HHRP cohort at 24 h (HHRP 60.64 mg/L (25.20-143.20); ORP 34.67 mg/L (9.30-71.20)) (p = 0.003) and 48 h post-operatively (HHRP 154.54 mg/L (65.90-369.00); ORP 81.60 mg/L (21.30-219.40) (p = 0.004). The post-operative Hb-levels were significantly lower in the HHRP cohort at 24 h (HHRP 11.11 g/dL (9.10-12.30); ORP 11.37 g/dL (8.80-14.00)) (p = 0.0008) and 48 h (HHRP 10.86 g/dL (9.50-12.00); ORP 11.25 g/dL (8.60-14.10)) (p = 0.03). Post-operative ESR levels were significantly higher in the HHRP cohort 48 h post-op (HHRP 45.21 mm/h (14.00-83.00); ORP 23.73 mm/h (2.00-73.00)) (p = 0.004). No significant differences were found for the CK and LDH levels at any time postoperatively. There were no complications in any group.

Conclusion

The use of an orthostatic retractor placement device allows for reducing the OR-time, post-operative blood loss and post-operative inflammatory response during the learning curve of DAA THA.

The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components

BACKGROUND

Lewinnek's recommendation for orienting the cup in THA is criticized because it involves a static assessment of the safe zone and because it does not consider stem geometry. A revised concept of the safe zone should consider those factors, but to our knowledge, this has not been assessed.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) To determine the shape, size, and location of target zones for combined cup and stem orientation for a straight stem/hemispheric cup THA to maximize the impingement-free ROM and (2) To determine whether and how these implant positions change as stem anteversion, neck-shaft angle, prosthetic head size and target range of movements are varied.

METHODS

A three-dimensional computer-assisted design model, in which design geometry was expressed in terms of parameters, of a straight stem/hemispheric cup hip prosthesis was designed, its design parameters modified systematically, and each prosthesis model was implanted virtually at predefined component orientations. Functional component orientation referencing to body planes was used: cups were abducted from 20° to 70°, and anteverted from -10° to 40°. Stems were rotated from -10° to 40° anteversion, neck-shaft angles varied from 115° to 143°, and head sizes varied from 28 to 40 mm. Hip movements up to the point of prosthetic impingement were tested, including simple flexion/extension, internal/external rotation, ab/adduction, combinations of these, and activities of daily living that were known to trigger dislocation. For each combination of parameters, the impingement-free combined target zone was determined. Maximizing the size of the combined target zone was the optimization criterion.

RESULTS

The combined target zones for impingement-free cup orientation had polygonal boundaries. Their size and position in the diagram changed with stem anteversion, neck-shaft angle, head size, and target ROM. The largest target zones were at neck-shaft angles from 125° to 127°, at stem anteversions from 10° to 20°, and at radiographic cup anteversions between 17° and 25°. Cup anteversion and stem anteversion were inverse-linearly correlated supporting the combined-anteversion concept. The range of impingement-free cup inclinations depended on head size, stem anteversion, and neck-shaft angle. For a 127°-neck-shaft angle, the lowest cup inclinations that fell within the target zone were 42° for the 28-mm and 35° for the 40-mm head. Cup anteversion and combined version depended on neck-shaft angle. For head size 32-mm cup, anteversion was 6° for a 115° neck-shaft angle and 25° for a 135°-neck-shaft angle, and combined version was 15° and 34° respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The shape, size, and location of the combined target zones were dependent on design and implantation parameters of both components. Changing the prosthesis design or changing implantation parameters also changed the combined target zone. A maximized combined target zone was found. It is mandatory to consider both components to determine the accurate impingement-free prosthetic ROM in THA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study accurately defines the hypothetical impingement-free, design-specific component orientation in THA. Transforming it into clinical precision may be the case for navigation and/or robotics, but this is speculative, and as of now, unproven.

Influence of pelvic sagittal tilt on 3-dimensional bone coverage in total hip arthroplasty: a simulation analysis

BACKGROUND

In total hip arthroplasty with computer navigation assistance, cup orientation is generally determined according to the coordinate system relative to the functional pelvic plane (FPP). However, there is a large difference in the cup anteversion between a posterior pelvic tilt relative to the computed tomography (CT) table in the sagittal plane and anterior pelvic tilt, even when the cup is set at the same orientation angle according to each FPP. The present study analysed this difference from the viewpoint of 3-dimensional (3D) coverage of the acetabular component (3D coverage) to determine how the 3D acetabular coverage is altered with changes in pelvic sagittal tilt.

METHODS

We analysed 3D-simulated acetabular coverage measured in 3D pelvic models reconstructed from the preoperative CT data of 50 patients. In each patient, we created 5 pelvic models with a sagittal tilt of 10° increments between 20° anterior tilt and 20° posterior tilt relative to the CT table.

RESULTS

We found that 3D coverage decreased as the pelvis tilted posteriorly. Particularly, there were significant differences between the pelvis with 20° anterior tilt and that with neutral tilt (p < 0.001). There was also a difference between the pelvis with neutral tilt and that with a 20° posterior tilt (p < 0.01). The mean decrease in 3D coverage between the pelvis with neutral tilt and that with 20° posterior tilt was 7.2 ± 1.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that 3D coverage differed among pelvis with different sagittal tilts when the cup orientation angle was determined according to FPP.

Accuracy of planar anteversion measurements using anteroposterior radiographs

Background

Several methods using simple anteroposterior (AP) radiographs have been suggested for the measurement of anteversion of the cup component after total hip arthroplasty. Herein, we compared six widely used anteversion measurement methods using two different types of AP radiograph, the conventional pelvis AP and hip-centered AP radiographs, to identify the measurement method and the type of radiograph that would provide the highest accuracy and reliability.

Methods

We developed two custom-made bi-planar anteversion measurement models for the validation test. The models were designed for pelvis AP and hip-centered AP radiographs, respectively. The radiographs were acquired using the inclination angles of both models, changing from 10° to 70° at 10° increments. For each inclination angle, anteversion was changed from 0° to 30° at 5° increments. The measurements were obtained independently by two orthopedic surgeons blinded from each other’s measurements, using the methods of 1) Pradhan et al., 2) Lewinnek et al., 3) Widmer et al., 4) Liaw et al., 5) Hassan et al., and 6) Ackland et al. The measurements were repeated after 2 months. The accuracy, compared with that of the reference angle, and intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities of each method were calculated.

Results

The highest accuracy was found when the method of Liaw et al. was used with hip-centered AP radiographs, which showed a difference of 1.37° ± 1.73 from the reference angle. Moreover, regardless of the type of radiograph, the methods by Pradhan et al., Lewinnek et al., and Liaw et al. showed excellent correlations with the reference anteversion. However, substantial differences were found when the methods by Widmer et al., Hassan et al., and Ackland et al. were used, regardless of the type of radiograph used. When anteversion was measured in an inclination between 30° and 50°, the method of Pradhan et al., when used with pelvis AP radiographs, showed the highest accuracy (1.23° ± 0.92°). We also found no significant difference in anteversions between the measurements made on pelvic and hip-centered AP radiographs. Both interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities were high for all the measurements tested.

Conclusions

The methods by Pradhan et al., Liaw et al., and Lewinnek et al. may provide relatively accurate anteversion measurements with high reliability, regardless of the type of radiograph.

Variations in sagittal and coronal stem tilt and their impact on prosthetic impingement in total hip arthroplasty

Optimization of the combined anteversion of cup and stem has been emphasized to avoid prosthetic impingement in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, no study has focused on the impact of variations in sagittal and coronal stem tilt against the whole femur on prosthetic range of motion. The purposes of the present study were a) to quantify the anatomical variation of sagittal and coronal tilt of the proximal canal axis against the femoral retrocondylar coordinate system, that is variation of sagittal and coronal stem tilt and b) to determine their impact on the zone of impingement-free cup position using computer simulation. Preoperative computed tomography images of 477 femurs from 409 consecutive patients who underwent THA using computed tomography-based computer navigation were stored. Virtual implantation of an anatomical stem was performed on the navigation workstation. The safe zone of the cup position with regard to prosthetic impingement was determined by motion simulation in the range of sagittal and coronal stem tilt of the subjects. The sagittal and coronal stem tilt varied by 10°, which was smaller than the stem anteversion variation. However, there was about 3 times the difference in the impingement-free zone of cup position in the ranges of sagittal and coronal stem tilt. The safe zone was significantly decreased by posterior tilt and valgus tilt of the stem. Range of motion simulation revealed that the variations in sagittal or coronal stem tilt significantly influenced the safe zone of the cup. In conclusion, although the variations in sagittal and coronal stem tilt against the femoral retrocondylar coordinate system were small, their impact on prosthetic impingement was significant.

The best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty on plain radiographs

Background

Several radiological methods for measuring the anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty (THA) exist, and no single standardized method has been established. We evaluated the reliability and accuracy of six widely utilized methods (Liaw et al., Lewinnek et al., Widmer, Hassan et al., Ackland et al., and Woo and Morrey) for measuring anteversion on plain radiographs, using a reference standard in the same definition obtained from the PolyWare programme.

Methods

We reviewed 71 patients who underwent primary unilateral THA. The anteversion of the acetabular component was measured on pelvis AP radiographs using five different methods (Liaw et al., Lewinnek et al., Widmer, Hassan et al., and Ackland et al.) and on cross-table lateral radiographs using the method of Woo and Morrey. The values obtained using the PolyWare programme, which determines the anteversion of the acetabular component by edge detection, were regarded as the reference standard.

Results

Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities were excellent for all methods using plain radiographs, including the PolyWare programme. The method of Liaw et al. obtained values similar to those obtained using the PolyWare programme and was thus considered accurate (P = 0.447). However, values obtained using the other five methods significantly differed from those obtained using the PolyWare programme and were thus considered less accurate (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.007, and P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

The method of Liaw et al. is more accurate than other methods using plain radiographs for the measurement of the anteversion of the acetabular component after THA, with reference to the anteversion obtained from the PolyWare programme.

The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA

BACKGROUND

Cup malposition is a common cause of impingement, limitation of ROM, acceleration of bearing wear, liner fracture, and instability in THA. Previous studies of the safe zone based on plain radiographs have limitations inherent to measuring angles from two-dimensional projections. The current study uses CT to measure component position in stable and unstable hips to assess the presence of a safe zone for cup position in THA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Does acetabular component orientation, when measured on CT, differ in stable components and those revised for recurrent instability? (2) Do CT data support historic safe zone definitions for component orientation in THA?

METHODS

We identified 34 hips that had undergone revision of the acetabulum for recurrent instability that also had a CT scan of the pelvis between August 2003 and February 2017. We also identified 175 patients with stable hip replacements who also had a CT study for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation of the contralateral side. For each CT study, one observer analyzed major factors including acetabular orientation, femoral anteversion, combined anteversion (the sum of femoral and anatomic anteversion), pelvic tilt, total offset difference, head diameter, age, sex, and body mass index. These measures were then compared among stable hips, hips with cup revision for anterior instability, and hips with cup revision for posterior instability. We used a clinically relevant measurement of operative anteversion and inclination as opposed to the historic use of radiographic anteversion and inclination. The percentage of unstable hips in the historic Lewinnek safe zone was calculated, and a new safe zone was proposed based on an area with no unstable hips.

RESULTS

Anteriorly unstable hips compared with stable hips had higher operative anteversion of the cup (44° ± 12° versus 31° ± 11°, respectively; mean difference, 13°; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5°-21°; p = 0.003), tilt-adjusted operative anteversion of the cup (40° ± 6° versus 26° ± 10°, respectively; mean difference, 14°; 95% CI, 10°-18°; p < 0.001), and combined tilt-adjusted anteversion of the cup (64° ± 10° versus 54° ± 19°, respectively; mean difference, 10°; 95% CI, 1°-19°; p = 0.028). Posteriorly unstable hips compared with stable hips had lower operative anteversion of the cup (19° ± 15° versus 31° ± 11°, respectively; mean difference, -12°; 95% CI, -5° to -18°; p = 0.001), tilt-adjusted operative anteversion of the cup (19° ± 13° versus 26° ± 10°, respectively; mean difference, -8°; 95% CI, -14° to -2°; p = 0.014), pelvic tilt (0° ± 6° versus 4° ± 6°, respectively; mean difference, -4°; 95% CI, -7° to -1°; p = 0.007), and anatomic cup anteversion (25° ± 18° versus 34° ± 12°, respectively; mean difference, -9°; 95% CI, -1° to -17°; p = 0.033). Thirty-two percent of the unstable hips were located in the Lewinnek safe zone (11 of 34; 10 posterior dislocations, one anterior dislocation). In addition, a safe zone with no unstable hips was identified within 43° ± 12° of operative inclination and 31° ± 8° of tilt-adjusted operative anteversion.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study supports the notion of a safe zone for acetabular component orientation based on CT. However, the results demonstrate that the historic Lewinnek safe zone is not a reliable predictor of future stability. Analysis of tilt-adjusted operative anteversion and operative inclination demonstrates a new safe zone where no hips were revised for recurrent instability that is narrower for tilt-adjusted operative anteversion than for operative inclination. Tilt-adjusted operative anteversion is significantly different between stable and unstable hips, and surgeons should therefore prioritize assessment of preoperative pelvic tilt and accurate placement in operative anteversion. With improvements in patient-specific cup orientation goals and acetabular component placement, further refinement of a safe zone with CT data may reduce the incidence of cup malposition and its associated complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Hip Spine Relationships: Application to Total Hip Arthroplasty

Lumbosacral orientation in the sagittal plane is of utmost importance, as it plays a critical role in the function of the spine and the hip joints. Equilibrium of the trunk influences the tridimensional orientation of the acetabulum and the functional range of motion of the hips. Each patient is characterized by a “morphological” parameter named incidence angle; its sagittal balance is the consequence of a postural adaptation for other functional parameters (pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, acetabular sagittal tilt, functional anteversion). Understanding variations of the sacral slope on lateral pelvic X-rays is essential for planning total hip arthroplasty and identifying patients at risk of impingement, as lumbosacral posture influences functional anteversion of the acetabulum. Posterior pelvic version as in sitting position (sacral slope decrease) is linked to the increase of the functional acetabular anteversion. Anterior pelvic version as in standing position (sacral slope increase) is linked to the decrease of the functional acetabular anteversion.

Current Concepts in Acetabular Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Being one of the most successful surgeries in the history of medicine, the indications for total hip arthroplasty have widened and are increasingly being offered to younger and fitter patients. This has also led to high expectations for longevity and outcomes. Acetabular cup position has a significant impact on the results of hip arthroplasty as it affects dislocation, abductor muscle strength, gait, limb lengths, impingement, noise generation, range of motion (ROM), wear, loosening, and cup failure. The variables in cup position are depth, height, and angular position (anteversion and inclination). The implications of change in depth of center of rotation (COR) are medialized versus anatomical positioning. As opposed to traditional medialization with beneficial effects on joint reaction force, the advantages of an anatomical position are increasingly recognized. The maintained acetabular offset offers advantages in terms of ROM, impingement, cortical rim press fit, and maintaining medial bone stock. The height of COR influences muscle activity and limb lengths and available bone stock for cup support. On the other hand, ideal angular position remains a matter of much debate and reliably achieving a target angular position remains elusive. This is not helped by variations in the way we describe angular position, with operative, radiologic, or anatomic definitions being used variably to describe anteversion and inclination. Furthermore, pelvic tilt plays a major role in functional positions of the acetabulum. In addition, commonly used techniques of positioning often do not inform us of the real orientation of the pelvis on operating table, with possibility of significant adduction, flexion, and external rotation of the pelvis being possibilities. This review article brings together the evidence on cup positioning and aims to provide a systematic and pragmatic approach in achieving the best position in individual cases.

Visual intraoperative estimation of range of motion is misleading in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Generally range of motion (ROM) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is intraoperatively assessed by eye. Can we assume that visual estimation of ROM is reliable?

METHODS

60 patients underwent cementless THA in a subgroup analysis of a clinical prospective trial using a minimally invasive anterolateral approach in lateral decubitus position. Four experienced surgeons intraoperatively estimated ROM visually by assessment of the femur relative to the alignment of the patient's pelvis. These estimations were compared with computer navigation measurements.

RESULTS

We found a mean difference between navigation measurements and intraoperative estimations by eye of -5.6° (±10.9°; -17° to 30°) for flexion, respectively, -0.4° (±10.7°; -24° to 30°) for extension, 8.7° (±9.0°; -10° to 34°) for abduction, 5.9° (±18.3°; -58° to 68°) for external rotation and -5.8° (±12.1°; -38° to 22°) for internal rotation. Multivariate analysis showed no association between the visual accuracy of estimation of ROM and patient characteristics, such as BMI, sex, grade of osteoarthritis and treatment side except for a significant correlation of visual accuracy of estimation of extension and the level of professional experience. Otherwise, the level of professional experience had no impact on the accuracy of estimation of ROM by eye.

CONCLUSIONS

Even the experienced surgeon's intraoperative estimation of ROM by eye is not reliable and differs up to 30° compared to objective measurements in minimally invasive THA. For accurate intraoperative assessment of ROM, the use of technical devices is recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS00000739.

Standing or supine x-rays after total hip replacement - when is the safe zone not safe?

An acetabular prosthesis orientated outside the 'safe zone' is one of the key contributing factors in increasing complications after total hip replacement (THR). Although acetabular orientation is routinely assessed using supine x-rays, standing x-rays have been proposed because a change in body position alters pelvic tilt and therefore acetabular orientation. This study aimed to assess whether acetabular components orientated within the 'safe zone' in supine can also be outside the 'safe zone' in standing. Thirty patients (12M, 18F) had lateral and antero-posterior pelvic x-rays taken in standing and supine positions six weeks post THR. Pelvic tilt and acetabular orientation (anteversion and inclination) were measured and compared with respect to the limits of the 'safe zone'. In standing, the pelvis was relatively posteriorly tilted and both acetabular anteversion and inclination increased (p<0.0001). In 16 patients the acetabulum was orientated within the 'safe zone' in supine but outside the 'safe zone' in standing. Patients were significantly more likely to be outside the 'safe zone' in standing than when supine (p<0.0001).

Effect of femoral neck modularity upon the prosthetic range of motion in total hip arthroplasty

In total hip arthroplasty, aseptic loosening and dislocation are associated with not being able to achieve the correct prosthetic component orientation. Femoral neck modularity has been proposed as a solution to this problem by allowing the surgeon to alter either the neck-shaft or version angle of the prosthetic femoral component intra-operatively. A single replicate full factorial design was used to evaluate how effective a modular femoral neck cementless stem was in restoring a healthy prosthetic range of motion in comparison with a leading fixed-neck cementless stem with the standard modular parameters. It was found that, if altered to a large enough degree, femoral neck modularity can increase the amount of prosthetic motion as well as alter its position to where it is required physiologically. However, there is a functional limit to the amount that can be corrected and there is a risk with regard to the surgeon having to select the optimum modular neck before any benefit is realised.

Risk of edge-loading and prosthesis impingement due to posterior pelvic tilting after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Proper implant orientation is essential for avoiding edge-loading and prosthesis impingement in total hip arthroplasty. Although cup orientation is affected by a change in pelvic tilt after surgery, it has been unclear whether surgeons can prevent impingement and edge-loading by proper positioning by taking into account any change in pelvic alignment associated with alteration of hip range of motion.

METHODS

We simulated implant orientation without edge-loading and prosthesis impingement, even with a change in pelvic tilt and associated change in hip range of motion after surgery, by collision detection using implant models created with computer-aided design.

FINDINGS

If posterior pelvic tilting with a corresponding hyperextension change in hip range of motion after surgery remains within 10°, as occurs in 90% of cases, surgeons can avoid edge-loading and impingement by correctly orienting the implant, even when using a conventional prosthesis. However, if a 20° change occurs after surgery, it may be difficult to avoid those risks.

INTERPRETATION

Although edge-loading and impingement can be prevented by performing appropriate surgery in most cases, even when taking into account postoperative changes in pelvic tilt, it may also be important to pay attention to spinal conditions to ensure that pelvic tilting is not extreme because of increasing kyphosis.

Excessive polyethylene wear and acetabular bone defects from standard use of a hooded acetabular insert in total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

In total hip arthroplasty (THA) the use of a polyethylene (PE) insert with a hooded rim can be considered to reduce dislocation risks. This benefit has to be balanced against the potential introduction of impingement of the femoral component on this rim. We present a case series of early acetabular revisions for excessive PE wear and acetabular bone defects from overuse of such a hooded rim insert.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with 34 consecutive early acetabular revisions were evaluated on failure mechanism. One type of implant was used in all cases. Standard pelvic radiographs and pre-operative CT scans were used to quantify PE wear, implant positioning and acetabular bone defects.

RESULTS

An acetabular revision with impaction grafting was performed in all cases with a mean cup survival of ten years (range 1.3-19.3). No concurrent stem revisions were necessary. Overall implant positioning was adequate with a mean cup inclination of 45° (range 39-57) and anteversion of 25° (range eight to 45). The mean PE wear was 0.24 mm/year (range 0.00-1.17). The mean acetabular bone defect on pelvic CT scans was calculated as 352 mm² (range zero to 1107) and 369 mm² (range zero to 1300) in the coronal and transversal planes, respectively. A hooded acetabular insert was retrieved in all cases and profound PE wear, typically from the posterior hooded rim, was encountered.

CONCLUSION

The use of hooded acetabular inserts may be considered to improve implant stability intra-operatively. This case series clearly presents that together with these devices, component impingement with concordant complications such as accelerated PE wear may be introduced. Standard use of these stabilizing inserts should thus be avoided.

Pelvic incidence: a predictive factor for three-dimensional acetabular orientation-a preliminary study

Acetabular cup orientation (inclination and anteversion) is a fundamental topic in orthopaedics and depends on pelvis tilt (positional parameter) emphasising the notion of a safe range of pelvis tilt. The hypothesis was that pelvic incidence (morphologic parameter) could yield a more accurate and reliable assessment than pelvis tilt. The aim was to find out a predictive equation of acetabular 3D orientation parameters which were determined by pelvic incidence to include in the model. The second aim was to consider the asymmetry between the right and left acetabulae. Twelve pelvic anatomic specimens were measured with an electromagnetic Fastrak system (Polhemus Society) providing 3D position of anatomical landmarks to allow measurement of acetabular and pelvic parameters. Acetabulum and pelvis data were correlated by a Spearman matrix. A robust linear regression analysis provided prediction of acetabulum axes. The orientation of each acetabulum could be predicted by the incidence. The incidence is correlated with the morphology of acetabula. The asymmetry of the acetabular roof was correlated with pelvic incidence. This study allowed analysis of relationships of acetabular orientation and pelvic incidence. Pelvic incidence (morphologic parameter) could determine the safe range of pelvis tilt (positional parameter) for an individual and not a group.

Use of intraoperative X-rays to optimize component position and leg length during total hip arthroplasty

Proper femoral and acetabular component position and leg length equality are important intraoperative considerations during total hip arthroplasty. Unfortunately, traditional surgical techniques often lead to suboptimal component position, and such deviations have been associated with increased rates of prosthetic wear, dislocation, component loosening, and patient dissatisfaction. Although surgical navigation has been shown to improve reproducibility of component alignment, such technology is not universally available and is associated with significant costs and additional surgical/anesthetic time. In the current study, we found that a routine intraoperative pelvic radiograph could successfully identify malpositioned components and leg length inequalities and could allow for successful correction of identified problems. Unexpected component malposition and leg length inequality occurred in only 1.5% of cases where an intraoperative pelvic radiograph was utilized.

A prospective randomized peri- and post-operative comparison of the minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus the lateral approach

There is still controversy as to whether minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty enhances the postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients who underwent total hip replacement through an anterolateral minimally invasive (MIS) or a conventional lateral approach (CON). We performed a randomized, prospective study of 75 patients with primary hip arthritis, who underwent hip replacement through the MIS (n=36) or CON (n=39) approach. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and Harris Hip score (HHS) were evaluated at frequent intervals during the early postoperative follow-up period and then after 3.5 years. Pain sensations were recorded. Serological and radiological analyses were performed. In the MIS group the patients had smaller skin incisions and there was a significantly lower rate of patients with a positive Trendelenburg sign after six weeks postoperatively. After six weeks the HHS was 6.85 points higher in the MIS group (P=0.045). But calculating the mean difference between the baseline and the six weeks HHS we evaluated no significant differences. Blood loss was greater and the duration of surgery was longer in the MIS group. The other parameters, especially after the twelfth week, did not differ significantly. Radiographs showed the inclination of the acetabular component to be significantly higher in the MIS group, but on average it was within the same permitted tolerance range as in the CON group. Both approaches are adequate for hip replacement. Given the data, there appears to be no significant long term advantage to the MIS approach, as described in this study.

Factors predicting change in pelvic posterior tilt after THA

In total hip arthroplasty, steep cup inclination should be avoided because it increases the risk of edge loading. Pelvic posterior tilt should be carefully monitored because it increases cup inclination and anteversion, leading to edge loading or impingement. The authors evaluated how much the pelvic tilt angle changes from the supine position referenced in planning for cup orientation preoperatively to the standing position 1 year after total hip arthroplasty (Δref). The pelvic tilt angle was measured in 124 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis, and the mean Δref was -9.5°±5.3° (range, -23° to 5°). Preoperative compression fractures, spondylolisthesis, and disk-space narrowing were predictive of increased pelvic posterior tilt after total hip arthroplasty. The authors mathematically calculated how much change in pelvic posterior tilt was clinically possible with the original cup alignment, which ranged from 40° to 45° of radiographic inclination and 0° to 30° radiographic anteversion to more than 50° of inclination. Even if the maximum posterior tilt (23°) occurred, no edge loading would occur in almost half of those original cups. Surgeons should aim for 40° of inclination. When the original cup inclination was 40°, edge loading was prevented. Edge loading caused by steep cup inclination can be prevented by adjusting the cup orientation to account for predicted pelvic tilting, but spinal alignment must also be considered because lumbar kyphosis can increase postoperative pelvic posterior tilt.

Clinical experience with computer navigation in revision total hip arthroplasty

The biomechanically and anatomically correct placement of hip prostheses components is the main challenge in revision hip arthroplasty. The orientation of the cup and stem with the restoration of leg length, offset and hip centre is hampered by the defect situations frequently present. In primary hip arthroplasty, it has been demonstrated that the components can be accurately positioned using computer-navigated procedures. However, such procedures could also be of considerable benefit in revision hip arthroplasty. Systems that not only detect anatomical landmarks using pointers but also use image data for referencing may provide a possible solution for the defect situation. Literature about navigation in revision arthroplasty is very rare. This article comprises general considerations on this subject and presents our experience and possible clinical applications.

Effects of posterior pelvic tilt on anterior instability in total hip arthroplasty: a parametric experimental modeling evaluation

BACKGROUND

Anterior dislocation is one of the concerns of patients with posterior pelvic tilt undergoing total hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to evaluate the magnitude of posterior pelvic tilt constituting a risk for anterior dislocation by measuring the range of motion until impingement and dislocation under various pelvic tilt.

METHODS

Using a jig mounted prosthetic hip model, the ranges of external rotation at extension and internal rotation at flexion until reaching dislocation were tested. The site of impingement prior to dislocation was also recorded. Posterior pelvic tilt and the cup version were changed with 10° increments from 0° to 40° and from 10° retroversion to 30° anteversion, respectively. Effects of increasing femoral offset were also tested. We defined a required range of motion as having 30° external rotation at extension and 40° internal rotation at 90° flexion.

FINDINGS

External rotation decreased in a posterior pelvic tilt-dependent manner. In the case with more than 20° posterior pelvic tilt, available external rotation extended beyond required range with the cup anteversion of 20°. Decreasing cup anteversion improved external rotation, however, internal rotation decreased simultaneously. In the case with posterior pelvic tilt more than 20°, only cup anteversion with 0° or 10° satisfied the required range of motion. A +4 mm horizontal offset improved external rotation by 10° with delaying bony impingement.

INTERPRETATION

More than 20° of posterior pelvic tilt may cause anterior instability and diminish the optimal range of cup version. Increasing the femoral offset improved external rotation without reducing internal rotation.

Evaluation of range of motion restriction within the hip joint

In total hip arthroplasty, determining the impingement free range of motion requirement is a complex task. This is because in the native hip, motion is restricted by both impingement as well as soft tissue restraint. The aim of this study is to determine a range of motion benchmark which can identify motions which are at risk from impingement and those which are constrained due to soft tissue. Two experimental methodologies were used to determine motions which were limited by impingement and those motions which were limited by both impingement and soft tissue restraint. By comparing these two experimental results, motions which were limited by impingement were able to be separated from those motions which were limited by soft tissue restraint. The results show motions in extension as well as flexion combined with adduction are limited by soft tissue restraint. Motions in flexion, flexion combined with abduction and adduction are at risk from osseous impingement. Consequently, these motions represent where the maximum likely damage will occur in femoroacetabular impingement or at most risk of prosthetic impingement in total hip arthroplasty.

Acetabular component positioning using anatomic landmarks of the acetabulum

BACKGROUND

The acetabular cup should be properly oriented to prevent dislocation and to reduce wear. However, achieving proper cup placement is challenging with potentially large variations of cup position. We propose a new technique to position the acetabular cup.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We used this technique, then determined actual cup position and subsequent dislocation rate.

METHODS

We measured acetabular abduction (α°) and anteversion (β°) on preoperative CT scans in 46 patients (50 hips) scheduled for THA. During the operation, we identified the transverse acetabular notch (TAN) and anterior acetabular notch (AAN), a notch at the anterior acetabular margin. We then marked two reference points for 40° abduction at the acetabular rim: the superior point, which is opposite the TAN, and the inferior point at |α - 40| mm inside (when α was > 40°) or outside the TAN (when α was < 40°). We also marked two reference points for 15° anteversion: the posterior point opposite the AAN and the anterior point at |β - 15| mm inside (when β was < 15°) or outside the AAN (when β was > 15°). During cup insertion, we aligned cup abduction to the line between the superior and inferior points and cup anteversion to the line between the anterior and posterior points. We measured cup abduction and anteversion and evaluated the dislocation rate. One patient was lost to followup before 60 months; the minimum followup for the other 45 patients was 60 months (mean, 62.8 months; range, 60-65 months).

RESULTS

The mean cup abduction was 40° (range, 32°-47°) and the mean cup anteversion was 17° (range, 8°-25°). No dislocation occurred postoperatively in 49 hips (45 patients) for a minimum of 5 years followup.

CONCLUSIONS

We obtained adequate cup position with our method and none of 45 patients (49 hips) had dislocation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of level of evidence.

Assessment and management of chronic pain in patients with stable total hip arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful operations that can restore function and relieve pain. Although a majority of the patients achieve significant pain relief after THA, there are a number of patients that develop chronic pain for unknown reasons. A literature search was performed looking for chronic pain after total hip arthroplasty and stable THA. Major causes of chronic pain include aseptic loosening or infection. However, there is a subset of patients with a stable THA that present with chronic pain which can have several aetiologies. These include soft tissue, bony, neurological, vascular and psychological causes. Essential for successful treatment is the ability to make the correct diagnosis. Thus therapy may be either non-operative or operative. In addition, diagnosis and management often may require multidisciplinary approaches to successfully alleviate chronic pain in these patients with a stable prosthesis.

Anatomical hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty with a large change in pelvic inclination

The supine functional pelvic plane is the recommended reference pelvic plane for acetabular cup planning in navigation-assisted total hip arthroplasty. However, it is unclear whether it can be used in patients with a large preoperative positional change in pelvic inclination (PC) from the supine to the standing position because it is unknown whether these patients have a different hip range of motion (ROM). We measured the anatomical hip ROM after implantation by computed tomography-based navigation in 91 patients and found it to be similar between those with a small PC (<10°) and those with a large PC (≥10°). There was no significant correlation between ROM and preoperative PC. The supine functional pelvic plane is adequate for cup planning whether the PC is small or large.

Validation of the femoral anteversion measurement method used in imageless navigation

Total hip arthroplasty restores lost mobility to patients suffering from osteoarthritis and acute trauma. In recent years, navigated surgery has been used to control prosthetic component placement. Furthermore, there has been increasing research on what constitutes correct placement. This has resulted in the definition of a safe-zone for acetabular cup orientation. However, there is less definition with regard to femoral anteversion and how it should be measured. This study assesses the validity of the femoral anteversion measurement method used in imageless navigation, with particular attention to how the neutral rotation of the femur is defined. CT and gait analysis methodologies are used to validate the reference which defines this neutral rotation, i.e., the ankle epicondyle piriformis (AEP) plane. The findings of this study indicate that the posterior condylar axis is a reliable reference for defining the neutral rotation of the femur. In imageless navigation, when these landmarks are not accessible, the AEP plane provides a useful surrogate to the condylar axis, providing a reliable baseline for femoral anteversion measurement.

Reliability and validity of measuring version of the acetabular component

A variety of radiological methods of measuring version of the acetabular component after total hip replacement (THR) have been described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of six methods (those of Lewinnek; Widmer; Hassan et al; Ackland, Bourne and Uhthoff; Liaw et al; and Woo and Morrey) that are currently in use. In 36 consecutive patients who underwent THR, version of the acetabular component was measured by three independent examiners on plain radiographs using these six methods and compared with measurements using CT scans. The intra- and interobserver reliabilities of each measurement were estimated. All measurements on both radiographs and CT scans had excellent intra- and interobserver reliability and the results from each of the six methods correlated well with the CT measurements. However, measurements made using the methods of Widmer and of Ackland, Bourne and Uhthoff were significantly different from the CT measurements (both p < 0.001), whereas measurements made using the remaining four methods were similar to the CT measurements. With regard to reliability and convergent validity, we recommend the use of the methods described by Lewinnek, Hassan et al, Liaw et al and Woo and Morrey for measurement of version of the acetabular component.

Bony impingement limits design-related increases in hip range of motion

BACKGROUND

Factors affecting risk for impingement and dislocation can be related to the patient, implant design, or surgeon. While these have been studied independently, the impact of each factor relative to the others is not known.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We determined the effect of three implant design factors, prosthetic placement, and patient anatomy on subject-specific ROM.

METHODS

We virtually implanted hip geometry obtained from 16 CT scans using computer models of hip components with differences in head size, neck diameter, and neck-shaft angle. A contact detection model computed ROM before prosthetic or bony impingement. We correlated anatomic measurements from pelvic radiographs with ROM.

RESULTS

When we implanted the components for best fit to the subject's anatomy or in the recommended orientation of 45° abduction and 20° anteversion, ROM was greater than 110° of flexion, 30° of extension, 45° of adduction-abduction, and 40° of external rotation. Changes in head size, neck diameter, and neck-shaft angle generated small gains (3.6°-6°) in ROM when analyzed individually, but collectively, we noted a more substantial increase (10°-17°). Radiographic measurements correlated only moderately with hip flexion and abduction.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to tailor implant placement to each patient to maximize bony coverage without compromising ROM. Once bony impingement becomes the restricting factor, further changes in implant design may not improve ROM. Radiographic measurements do not appear to have value in predicting ROM.

Differences in acetabular morphology related to side and sex in a Chinese population

The purpose of the present study was to determine the side and sex differences in acetabular dimension and orientation in normal Chinese adults, which are not known well but are important in hip joint replacement surgery. The acetabular parameters, including anteversion angle (AV.A), abduction angle (AB.A), center edge angle (CE.A), acetabular width (Ac.W) and acetabular depth (Ac.D), were measured on CT images in 100 healthy Chinese adults. The acetabular index of depth to width (Ac.D/Ac.W) was calculated by depth/width × 100. Percentage side difference (PSD) was calculated for each parameter. The absolute numbers of PSD (aPSD) were compared between the groups of right positive (right PSD > left PSD) and left positive (left PSD > right PSD) groups. There was no significant side difference in any of the parameters. Compared to men, a significant increase in AB.A (P = 0.001) and significant decreases in Ac.W (P < 0.001), Ac.D (P < 0.001) and Ac.D/Ac.W (P < 0.05) occurred in women. The differences in Ac.W and Ac.D became insignificant when adjusted for body height. aPSD did not show a significant difference between right and left positive groups in both sexes. In conclusion, the side differences in acetabular parameters in a normal individual are likely to be associated with measurement error. In addition, the larger acetabular dimension in men is attributed to greater body height independent of sex.

Accessing 3D Location of Standing Pelvis: Relative Position of Sacral Plateau and Acetabular Cavities versus Pelvis

The goal of this paper is to access to pelvis position and morphology in standing posture and to determine the relative locations of their articular surfaces. This is obtained from coupling biplanar radiography and bone modeling. The technique involves different successive steps. Punctual landmarks are first reconstructed, in space, from their projected images, identified on two orthogonal standing X-rays. Geometric models, of global pelvis and articular surfaces, are determined from punctual landmarks. The global pelvis is represented as a triangle of summits: the two femoral head centers and the sacral plateau center. The two acetabular cavities are modeled as hemispheres. The anterior sacral plateau edge is represented by an hemi-ellipsis. The modeled articular surfaces are projected on each X-ray. Their optimal location is obtained when the projected contours of their models best fit real outlines identified from landmark images. Linear and angular parameters characterizing the position of global pelvis and articular surfaces are calculated from the corresponding sets of axis. Relative positions of sacral plateau, and acetabular cavities, are then calculated. Two hundred standing pelvis, of subjects and scoliotic patients, have been studied. Examples are presented. They focus upon pelvis orientations, relative positions of articular surfaces, and pelvis asymmetries.

Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers

BACKGROUND

A number of surgical approaches are utilized in total hip arthroplasty. It has been hypothesized that the anterior approach results in less muscle damage than the posterior approach. We prospectively analyzed biochemical markers of muscle damage and inflammation in patients treated with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with an anterior or posterior approach to provide objective evidence of the local soft-tissue injury at the time of arthroplasty.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients treated with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach and twenty-eight patients treated with the same procedure through a posterior approach were prospectively analyzed. Perioperative and radiographic data were collected to ensure cohorts with similar characteristics. Serum creatine kinase (CK), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1ß), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a) levels were measured preoperatively, in the post-anesthesia-care unit (except for the CRP level), and on postoperative days 1 and 2. The Student t test and Fisher exact test were used to make comparisons between the two groups. Independent predictors of elevation in levels of markers of inflammation and muscle damage were determined with use of multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The levels of the markers of inflammation were slightly decreased in the direct-anterior-approach group as compared with those in the posterior-approach group. The rise in the CK level in the posterior-approach group was 5.5 times higher than that in the anterior-approach group in the post-anesthesia-care unit (mean difference, 150.3 units/L [95% CI, 70.4 to 230.2]; p < 0.05) and nearly twice as high cumulatively (mean difference, 305.0 units/L [95% CI, -46.7 to 656.8]; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that the anterior total hip arthroplasty approach used in this study caused significantly less muscle damage than did the posterior surgical approach, as indicated by serum CK levels. The clinical importance of the rise in the CK level needs to be delineated by additional clinical studies. The overall physiologic burden, as demonstrated by measurement of inflammation marker levels, appears to be similar between the anterior and posterior approaches. Objective measurement of muscle damage and inflammation markers provides an unbiased way of determining the immediate effects of surgical intervention in patients treated with total hip arthroplasty.

Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers

BACKGROUND

A number of surgical approaches are utilized in total hip arthroplasty. It has been hypothesized that the anterior approach results in less muscle damage than the posterior approach. We prospectively analyzed biochemical markers of muscle damage and inflammation in patients treated with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with an anterior or posterior approach to provide objective evidence of the local soft-tissue injury at the time of arthroplasty.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients treated with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach and twenty-eight patients treated with the same procedure through a posterior approach were prospectively analyzed. Perioperative and radiographic data were collected to ensure cohorts with similar characteristics. Serum creatine kinase (CK), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1ß), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a) levels were measured preoperatively, in the post-anesthesia-care unit (except for the CRP level), and on postoperative days 1 and 2. The Student t test and Fisher exact test were used to make comparisons between the two groups. Independent predictors of elevation in levels of markers of inflammation and muscle damage were determined with use of multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The levels of the markers of inflammation were slightly decreased in the direct-anterior-approach group as compared with those in the posterior-approach group. The rise in the CK level in the posterior-approach group was 5.5 times higher than that in the anterior-approach group in the post-anesthesia-care unit (mean difference, 150.3 units/L [95% CI, 70.4 to 230.2]; p < 0.05) and nearly twice as high cumulatively (mean difference, 305.0 units/L [95% CI, -46.7 to 656.8]; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that the anterior total hip arthroplasty approach used in this study caused significantly less muscle damage than did the posterior surgical approach, as indicated by serum CK levels. The clinical importance of the rise in the CK level needs to be delineated by additional clinical studies. The overall physiologic burden, as demonstrated by measurement of inflammation marker levels, appears to be similar between the anterior and posterior approaches. Objective measurement of muscle damage and inflammation markers provides an unbiased way of determining the immediate effects of surgical intervention in patients treated with total hip arthroplasty.

Hip-spine relations and sagittal balance clinical consequences

INTRODUCTION

The role of the pelvic area in sagittal balance is evident for spinal surgeons, but the influence of the coxofemoral joint is underestimated and inadequately explained by conventional imagery. Comprehensive analysis of the pelvic and subpelvic sectors as part of the sagittal, frontal and cross-sectional balance of the trunk sheds new light on some spinal diseases and their relation to the pelvis.

METHODS

This analysis, based on innovative radiologic methods as the EOS(®) technology but also on a new look at conventional imaging makes it possible to better analyze standing lateral images and seated images.

RESULTS

Disturbances can come from atypical morphotypes or from unusual postures as in aging spine. The measurement of available extension and the concept of available flexion provide new information regarding individual's adaptation to the imbalance induced by disorders of the spine or lower limbs.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive assessment of each patient and in particular of the complex comprising the spine and the pelvis, is essential for understanding each individual's adaptation to the imbalance induced by disorders of the spine or lower limbs.

Establishing a range of motion boundary for total hip arthroplasty

Range of motion of the hip joint is a major contributor to dislocation post total hip replacement. Impingement is often treated as a surrogate for dislocation and occurs – prosthetically – when the neck of the femoral component contacts with the rim of the pelvic acetabular cup. This impingement is caused by movement of the leg during activities of daily living. This article analyses hip joint range of motion and its implication for impingement. A systematic literature review was undertaken with the purpose of establishing a range of motion benchmark for total hip replacement. This paper proposes a method by which a three-dimensional range of motion boundary established from the literature can be presented. The nominal boundary is also validated experimentally using a number of configurations of a neutral hip joint coordinate frame.

Limitations of imageless computer-assisted navigation for total hip arthroplasty

We prospectively evaluated acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty with an imageless computer navigation system or using conventional manual technique. The achieved cup orientation in the manual group had substantially larger variances and greater placement error than the navigation cases. The use of navigation was abandoned in 3 cases because of excessive pelvic tilt and unreliable registration of the pelvis. Computer navigation system helped improve the accuracy of the acetabular cup placement for total hip arthroplasty in this study. The variation between the intraoperative navigation readings and the computed tomographic values suggests that relying on palpation of bony landmarks through drapes and tissue is a limitation of this method. Further, the variation in pelvic tilt has an effect on cup placement that requires further studies.

Does acetabular inclination angle affect survivorship of alumina-ceramic articulations?

BACKGROUND

Reports in the literature have linked high acetabular inclination angles to increased wear of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. However, many of these studies were only conducted in vitro and did not address the clinical relevance of such findings.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore determined: (1) whether the cup inclination angle influences survival or function in patients with ceramic-on-ceramic implants; (2) the incidence of radiolucencies, osteolysis, and subsidence of ceramic-on-ceramic implants; and (3) whether the survival rate higher for ceramic-on-ceramic THAs than for conventional metal-on-polyethylene THAs.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 537 THAs performed in 512 prospectively followed patients having THA between October 1996 and October 2000. Eleven patients (12 hips) were lost to followup before 2 years, leaving 501 patients (525 THAs); of these, 421 were alumina ceramic-on-ceramic articulations and 104 cobalt-chromium-on-polyethylene. The mean age was 54 years. We determined acetabular cup inclination angles, Harris hip scores, Health-Status-Questionnaire-12 scores, and presence and location of any radiolucencies, osteolysis, or radiographic subsidence. We compared survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. The minimum followup was 24 months (mean, 59 months; range, 24-120 months).

RESULTS

Twenty-two of the 424 THAs (4.2%) were revised. We observed no difference in clinical or radiographic outcomes with respect to cup inclination angles. Radiographically, two loose acetabular components and two femoral components had subsided. The 5-year survival rate was slightly higher for ceramic-on-ceramic bearings (98%) than for metal-on-polyethylene (92%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there may be a link between acetabular inclination angles and wear rates as reported by some authors, we found no differences in patient function or radiographic survivorship using alumina-on-alumina articulations.

Component impingement in total hip arthroplasty: frequency and risk factors. A continuous retrieval analysis series of 416 cup

INTRODUCTION

Impingement is a factor of failure in total hip replacement (THR), causing instability and early wear. Its true frequency is not known; cup-retrieval series reported rates varying from 27 to 84%.

HYPOTHESIS

The hypothesis was that a large continuous series of THR cup removals would help determine the frequency of component impingement.

OBJECTIVES

The hypothesis was tested on a continuous retrospective series of cups removed in a single center, with a secondary objective of identifying risk factors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

[corrected] Macroscopic examination looked for component impingement signs in 416 cups retrieved by a single operator between 1989 and 2004. Risk factors were investigated by uni- and multivariate analyses in the 311 cases for which there were complete demographic data. In these 311 cases, removal was for aseptic loosening (131 cases), infection (43 cases), instability (56 cases), osteolysis (28 cases) or unexplained pain (48 cases); impingement was explicitly implicated in only five cases (1.6%), always with hard-on-hard bearing components.

RESULTS

Impingement was found in 214 of the 416 cups (51.4%) and was severe (notch>1mm) in 130 (31.3%). In the subpopulation of 311 cups, impingement was found in 184 cases (59.2%) and was severe in 109 (35%). Neither duration of implant use nor cup diameter or frontal orientation emerged as risk factors. On univariate analysis, impingement was more frequently associated with revision for instability, young patient age at THR, global hip range of motion >200° or use of an extended femoral head flange (or of an elevated antidislocation rim liner), and was more severe in case of head/neck ratio<2. On multivariate analysis, only use of an extended head flange (RR 3.2) and revision for instability (RR 4.2) remained as independent risk factors for impingement.

DISCUSSION

Component impingement is frequently observed in cups after removal, but is rarely found as a direct indication for revision, except in case of hard-on-hard friction couples (polyethylene being the most impingement-tolerant material). Systematic use of extended head flanges and elevated antidislocation rims is not to be recommended, especially in case of excessive ROM. A good head/neck ratio should be sought, notably by increasing the head diameter in less impingement-tolerant hard-on-hard friction couples. Although not identified as a risk factor in the present study, implant orientation should be checked; computer-assisted surgery can be useful in this regard, for adaptation to the patient's individual range-of-motion cone.

Acetabular anteversion with CT in supine, simulated standing, and sitting positions in a THA patient population

BACKGROUND

Appraisal of the orientation of implants in THA dislocations currently is based on imaging done with the patient in the supine position. However, dislocation occurs in standing or sitting positions. Whether measured anteversion differs in images projected in the position of dislocation is unclear.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We compared measured acetabular cup orientations on axial CT scans taken with the patient in a supine position with those from CT sections at angles to the sacral slope reflecting standing and sitting positions.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the radiographs of 328 asymptomatic patients who had THAs. Anatomic acetabular anteversion (AAA) was measured from the plain CT scan (supine position, axial CT sections). The AAA also was measured on reformatted CT scans in which the orientation was adjusted individually to the sacral slope on lateral radiographs with patients in the standing and sitting positions.

RESULTS

The mean/(SD) AAA changed from 24.2° (6.9°) in the supine position to 31.7° (5.6°) and 38.8° (5.4°) in simulated standing and sitting positions, respectively. The supine AAA correlated with the standing AAA (r = 0.857) but not with the sitting AAA (r = 0.484).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest measurement of the AAA on a plain CT scan used in current practice is biased. In patients with recurrent posterior dislocation from a sitting position, accounting for the functional variations in measurement of the position of the acetabular cup provides more relevant information regarding component positioning.

Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this investigation is to determine the optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty for reducing neck impingement using a mathematical formula.

METHODS

We calculated the cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem antetorsion in cases with various sizes of femoral head (28, 32, 36, and 44 mm in diameter) to fulfill severe range of motion criteria: (1) flexion more than 120°, (2) extension more than 30°, (3) internal rotation at 90° flexion more than 60°, and (4) external rotation at neutral more than 40°.

RESULTS

When the areas to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria were compared by femoral head diameter, the area for 28 mm was extremely small relative to those of 32, 36, and 44 mm. Theoretically, the optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty without neck impingement should be oriented at a cup inclination of 45° combined with the cup anteversion and stem antetorsion so that the sum of the cup anteversion plus 0.7 times the stem antetorsion equals 42° with a head diameter more than 32 mm. This study also recommends the optimum position of the prosthesis as 45° cup inclination, 25° cup anteversion, and 25° stem antetorsion when the surgeon can choose a freely adjustable modular stem system. However, this theory assumes that the pelvic inclination has no changes caused by aging and can be validated in the lying, sitting, and standing positions.

CONCLUSIONS

The prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty without neck impingement should be oriented at a cup inclination of 45° combined with cup anteversion and stem antetorsion determined by the formula: cup anteversion + 0.7 × stem antetorsion = 42°. A range of acceptable positions would be more helpful and realistic to a surgeon trying to ensure adequate prosthesis positions.

Component positioning in primary total hip replacement: a prospective comparative study of two anterolateral approaches, minimally invasive versus gluteus medius hemimyotomy

INTRODUCTION

One factor of implant survivorship in total hip replacement (THR) is the quality of implant choice and positioning. The purported advantages of minimally invasive approaches are faster recovery, shorter hospital stay and less per-operative blood loss. On the other hand, there have been many reports of higher complication rates, and doubts as to the quality of implant positioning.

HYPOTHESIS

The quest to minimize tissue damage is at the cost of THR positioning quality.

OBJECTIVES

To assess implant positioning in a prospective comparative continuous multicenter series.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2008 and 2009, a prospective comparative study was conducted on a continuous series of 141 THRs. Ninety-two were performed in two centers, using a minimally invasive Watson-Jones approach; the other 49, performed in a 3rd center, used an anterolateral approach with anterior hemimyotomy. The surgeons were in all cases experienced in their technique. Short-term follow-up comprised clinical and functional (Postel Merle d'Aubigné (PMA), Harris, SF12, WOMAC) and biological assessment (serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK), myoglobinemia, hematocrit) and analysis of complications and of implant positioning on X-ray and CT-scan.

RESULTS

On the Watson-Jones approach, surgery time was longer; day-1 analgesic administration was lower; PMA, Harris and WOMAC scores were better at 6 weeks; and CPK levels were lower at 24 and 48hours. There were no significant differences on the other clinical and biological criteria. Implant positioning analysis revealed significantly greater combined anteversion and greater variation in acetabular inclination mean with the Watson-Jones approach, but no differences in cup positioning, femoral stem positioning, or limb length discrepancy.

DISCUSSION

The minimally invasive Watson-Jones approach provided faster recovery and less muscular damage. However, implant positioning was less precise in terms of acetabular cup inclination.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III. Prospective, comparative, non-randomized.

Modular necks improve the range of hip motion in cases with excessively anteverted or retroverted femurs in THA

BACKGROUND

Anteversion of an acetabular component often is difficult to ascertain in patients with THA in whom excessively anteverted or retroverted femurs may result in limited ROM or risk of dislocation. Restriction of motion, however, is determined by the combination of version of both components.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore determined the combined anteversion values that provide adequate ROM. We varied acetabular version by differing implantations and varied femoral version with modular necks.

METHODS

ROM was tested by changing cup anteversion after setting the femoral version to 20° or 60° anteversion or 20° retroversion. The angle of the modular neck was adjusted in 11 increments of 5° each. Range of internal rotation (IR) at 90° flexion, external rotation (ER) at 0° extension, and flexion (Flex) were measured when any impingement occurred before dislocation. We defined a required ROM as having 40° IR, 30° ER, and 110° Flex.

RESULTS

At 60° anteversion, ER was less than 10° even when the acetabular component was set at 10° retroversion because of posterior impingement. When a modular neck with 25° retroversion was used, ER improved to greater than 30°. At 20° retroversion, IR was 31° even when the acetabular component was opened to 35° anteversion. IR improved to 34° and 40° with 20° and 25° anteverted modular necks, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In cases with excessive femoral anteversion or retroversion, the required ROM could not be achieved by simply changing the version of acetabular components. The adjustment of femoral versions using the modular necks allowed additional improvement of ROM.