Radiolucency in stemless shoulder arthroplasty is associated with an imaging phenomenon

Influence of humeral position of the Affinis Short stemless shoulder arthroplasty system on long-term survival and clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of humeral position of the Affinis Short implant in stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (STSAs) on clinical and radiologic results and mid- to long-term survival in the treatment of primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the shoulder.

METHODS

Eighty patients treated with a stemless shoulder arthroplasty for OA of the shoulder were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 92 ± 14 months (range 69-116 months) by the Constant Score (CS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH), and active range of motion (ROM). Radiographic assessment for bone adaptations and humeral implant position was performed by plain radiographs. Comparison of the pre- and postoperative centers of rotation (CORs) was used to assess the restoration of the geometry of the humeral head. The appraisal of proper humeral component positioning was correlated with the functional outcomes. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to investigate the influence of humeral implant position compared to survival time. Complications were noted.

RESULTS

The ROM (P < .001), CS (P < .001), and DASH scores (P < .001) showed significant improvements after surgery for the entire series. The COR restoration was anatomic in 75% (n = 60) of all implants and in 25% (n = 20) nonanatomic implants (pre- and postoperative COR deviation of 2.7 ± 1.8 mm vs. 5.1 ± 3.2 mm, P = .0380). The humeral component position did not affect the functional outcome whereas the 10-year unadjusted cumulative survival rate for the anatomic group was significantly higher in comparison with the nonanatomic group (96.7% vs. 75%, P = .002). The radiologic evaluation revealed minor periprosthetic bone adaptions in various forms without clinical significance or further intervention. No revision was necessary because of a failed fixation of the stemless humeral component.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding the treatment of primary OA of the shoulder, STSA shows excellent long-term survival and clinical outcomes. In particular, STSA implants are able to restore the geometry of the humeral head. Nonanatomic reconstruction may influence the survival over the long term in different pathways. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the effect of humeral component position in STSA on function, pain, and implant survival rates.

Outcomes of different stem sizes in shoulder arthroplasty

Background

The successive refinement in implant design and operative technique alongwith improved understanding has resulted in increased incidence of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Simultaneously, the indications of TSA have widened and include a range of shoulder pathologies.

Methods

Using the keywords and relevant literature, we have described an overview of the different stem sizes used in shoulder arthroplasty. Relevant description of clinical and radiological outcome is done with regards to different stem sizes.

Discussion

There are plethora of shoulder replacement systems, based on unique philosophy and having their own advantages and disadvantages. Additionally, the rise in ageing population had increased the need for revision TSA, thereby necessitating the judicious choice of implant at primary TSA. We further present the role of cemented and uncemented humeral stems and discuss the findings of finite element analysis. The choice of humeral stem size and use of cemented or uncemented stems have been reported to affect the clinical and radiological outcomes.

Midterm results of stemless impaction shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective, multicenter study

Background

Stemless shoulder arthroplasty using 4 open-fin press-fit anchors has been showing promising short-term clinical and radiographic results for patients' primary osteoarthritis. This prospective, multicenter study presents 5-year postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes of a stemless shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.

Methods

Between November 2012 and December 2015, 100 patients were treated for primary osteoarthritis with the Sidus stem-free shoulder system at 7 European centers. Clinical assessment included the Constant-Murley Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score, Subjective Shoulder Value, and range of motion. True anteroposterior, axial and lateral radiographs were reviewed for osteolysis, glenoid and humerus loosening, heterotopic ossification, radiolucent lines, component migration and humeral bone resorption. In addition to a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, a comparative analysis between total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty was performed.

Results

Seventy-one patients (36 females) with a mean age of 63.8 years (range: 47-79 years) were available for the 5-year clinical and radiographic follow-up (range: 52-79 months). There was a significant increase (P < .0001) in all outcome scores compared to baseline values. Patients with total shoulder arthroplasty (n = 48) achieved significantly better functional outcome than patients with shoulder hemiarthroplasty (n = 23) with regard to the absolute and relative Constant-Murley Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score, and Subjective Shoulder Value as well as greater abduction strength and range of motion in forward elevation and external rotation (P ≤ .004). There were no cases of osteolysis or humeral loosening. There were some cases of heterotopic ossification (1.4%), radiolucency around the humerus (1.4%) or glenoid (25%), glenoid migration (2.1%), inferior osteophytes (1.4%) or humerus bone resorption (9.9%). The 5-year survival was 94%.

Conclusion

Patients treated with the Sidus stem-free shoulder system for primary osteoarthritis continue to achieve good clinical and radiographic results without any signs of aseptic humeral implant loosening at 5 years postsurgery.

Midterm clinical and radiologic survivorship of a stemless total shoulder arthroplasty

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of stemless total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in patients with glenohumeral arthritis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective case series of all patients who underwent a TSA with Affinis Short prosthesis during the period 2010-2017. Seventy-two TSAs were performed within our unit, in 62 patients (45 females and 17 males), with 10 patients having bilateral TSAs with this prosthesis. The mean follow-up was 3.9 years (2-8.7 years). Patients were evaluated clinically with the Oxford Shoulder Score, range of movement assessment, and a numerical patient satisfaction score. Follow-up radiographs were evaluated by 2 reviewers assessing for lucency and assigned a Lazarus grade.

RESULTS

Six patients were lost to follow-up prior to their 2-year review. At last follow-up, the mean forward elevation was 157° (80°-180°), abduction was 150° (60°-180°), and external rotation was 39° (20°-60°). The mode internal rotation was to the lumbar spine, with 95% of patients achieving internal rotation to L5 or higher. The mean Oxford Shoulder Score was 45 (18-48). The mean patient satisfaction score was 4.93/5. No humeral lucencies were observed. Sixty-four percent (n=47) of the glenoids were Lazarus grade 0, showing no evidence of radiolucency. The remaining patients were Lazarus grade 1-3, although none were progressive and all patients were asymptomatic. No patients were revised for aseptic loosening. Four patients underwent revision: 1 for infection, 1 for heterotrophic ossification and stiffness, and 2 for rotator cuff failure.

CONCLUSION

Midterm follow-up results indicate good clinical and radiologic survivorship for this stemless TSA. Our findings suggest good patient function and satisfaction, and no patients have required revision for aseptic loosening. Further follow-up is required to determine long-term survivorship.

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using a stem-free ellipsoid humeral implant in patients of all ages

BACKGROUND

Stem-free shoulder arthroplasty has recently been shown to have comparable results to stemmed arthroplasty, though stemless designs are typically used in a younger patient population. Additionally, although the native humeral head is elliptical in shape, clinical results with ellipsoid implants in shoulder arthroplasty have not been reported on previously. This case series reports on the outcomes of a recently introduced anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with an ellipsoid-shaped articular surface and unique multiplanar platform type of stemless fixation.

METHODS

This retrospective case series examines the initial cohort of patients who received an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using an ellipsoid stem-free humeral prosthesis and an all-polyethylene glenoid component from the Catalyst CSR Total Shoulder System (Catalyst OrthoScience) over a 1-year period. Inclusion criteria were patients with a diagnosis of advanced glenohumeral joint arthritis with an intact rotator cuff, regardless of patient age. Clinical outcomes including shoulder range of motion and patient-reported outcome measures, as well as radiographs, were evaluated at multiple time points postoperatively, with minimum 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixty-three shoulders in 57 patients with a mean age of 73.0 years (range 60-85 years) were included in the study with a mean follow-up period of 30.5 months (range 24-41 months). Forward elevation improved from 121° to 150° (P < .0001), external rotation improved from 28° to 48° (P < .0001), and internal rotation improved from L3 to L1 (P < .001). There were statistically significant improvements exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score (37 to 94, P < .001), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) (40 to 93, P < .001), visual analog scale (6.3 to 0.4, P < .001), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical domain T score (44 to 57, P < .001). The improvement in the ASES score also exceeded the threshold for the substantial clinical benefit. Age, sex, and preoperative glenoid morphology did not appear to have an effect on the clinical outcome scores. There were no implant failures or evidence of radiographic loosening of the humerus component in any patients.

CONCLUSION

At 2-year minimum follow-up, this stem-free ellipsoid humerus total shoulder arthroplasty provides very good results with high patient satisfaction, clinical improvement in all outcome measures studied, and no signs of loosening.

Long-term survival and failure analysis of anatomical stemmed and stemless shoulder arthroplasties

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical results, long-term survival, and complication rates of stemless shoulder prosthesis with stemmed anatomical shoulder prostheses for treatment of osteoarthritis and to analyze radiological bone changes around the implants during follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 161 patients treated with either a stemmed or a stemless shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 118 months (102 to 158). The Constant score (CS), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, and active range of motion (ROM) were recorded. Radiological analysis for bone adaptations was performed by plain radiographs. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was calculated and complications were noted.

RESULTS

The ROM (p < 0.001), CS (p < 0.001), and DASH score (p < 0.001) showed significant improvements after shoulder arthroplasty for both implants. There were no differences between the groups treated with stemmed or stemless shoulder prosthesis with respect to the mean CS (79.2 (35 to 118) vs 74.4 (31 to 99); p = 0.519) and DASH scores (11.4 (8 to 29) vs 13.2 (7 to 23); p = 0.210). The ten-year unadjusted cumulative survival rate was 95.3% for the stemmed anatomical shoulder prosthesis and 91.5% for the stemless shoulder prosthesis and did not differ between the treatment groups (p = 0.251). The radiological evaluation of the humeral components in both groups did not show loosening of the humeral implant. The main reason for revision for each type of arthroplasties were complications related to the glenoid.

CONCLUSION

The use of anatomical stemless shoulder prosthesis yielded good and reliable results and did not differ from anatomical stemmed shoulder prosthesis over a mean period of ten years. The differences in periprosthetic humeral bone adaptations between both implants have no clinical impact during the follow-up. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1292-1300.

Survival of stemless humeral head replacement in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

The long-term results of shoulder arthroplasty using stemless humeral head components with a mean follow-up period > 10 years were not available until now. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of shoulder arthroplasty using a stemless humeral head component.

METHODS

Since 2005, we have documented stemless humeral head replacement prospectively. Seventy-five patients with a mean age of 57 years at surgery (40 hemi-shoulder arthroplasties [HSAs] and 35 total shoulder arthroplasties [TSAs], 38 women and 37 men) were clinically and radiologically followed up after a mean period of 126 months (range, 105-157 months). Functional results were documented using the age- and sex-normalized Constant-Murley score (CMS) (ie, relative CMS).

RESULTS

The relative CMS improved significantly (P < .0001) from 56% preoperatively to 90% postoperatively. Its subcategories of pain (8 points preoperatively vs. 12 points postoperatively, P < .0001), activities of daily living (10 points vs. 15 points, P < .0001), range of motion (20 points vs. 29 points, P < .0001), and strength (7 points vs. 11 points, P = .011) improved significantly as well. There was no significant difference in preoperative CMS vs. postoperative CMS, as well as its subcategories, between HSA (44.8 points vs. 67.1 points, P < .0001) and TSA (44.4 points vs. 68.9 points, P = .004). Clinically and radiologically, we observed no loosening of the stemless humeral head component. Stress shielding around the humeral component was not detected. Upward migration of the humeral head was observed in 17.5% of patients (21.6% with HSA and 11.5% with TSA, P = .303). No implant failure was observed on the humeral side. At follow-up, 18.3% of patients had rotator cuff deficiency (13.9% with HSA and 25% with TSA, P = .280). Overall, 9.3% of stemless shoulder arthroplasties were revised to reverse TSAs (5% of HSAs and 14.3% of TSAs, P = .097). TSA showed a trend for a higher revision rate than HSA. Secondary glenoid wear occurred in 64.3% of HSAs, and none of the HSAs were converted to TSAs. We observed an incomplete radiolucent line < 2 mm in 30.4% and glenoid loosening in 11.4% of cemented glenoid components. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a 10-year survivorship rate of 96.5% and an estimated 13-year survivorship rate of 90.1% for stemless humeral components.

CONCLUSION

Stemless humeral head replacement showed no loosening and a significant improvement in shoulder function after a mean period of 11 years. The long-term clinical and radiologic results as well as the survivorship of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty using a stemless humeral head implant are comparable to the long-term results of standard stemmed anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

Screw fixation in stemless shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis leads to less osteolysis when compared to impaction fixation

Background

Stemless total shoulder arthroplasty is a well-established and reliable surgical treatment option for glenohumeral osteoarthritis resulting in loss of pain and improvement of shoulder function. Currently the two methods for the fixation of the humeral component are either screw fixation or impaction. The purpose of this study is the clinical and radiological comparison of two different stemless designs (screw fixation vs impaction) for total shoulder arthroplasties in patients suffering from primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study including 39 patients with a mean age of 67 years and a minimum follow-up of 2 years was performed. Patients were separated into two groups based on the selected implant. In group A (n = 18) a screw fixation design and in group B (n = 21) an impaction type design was used. For clinical examination the Constant-Murley-Score (CS) and Subjective-Shoulder-Value (SSV) were evaluated. Radiological examination was performed on true-AP, axial and Y-view radiographs.

Results

In group A the CS increased from 27.1 to 65.2 points and SSV from 27.3 to 76.7% (p > 0.05). No osteolysis of the medial calcar or subsidence of the humeral implant were found in this group. In group B the CS increased from 29.0 to 72.6 points and SSV from 33.1 to 85% (p < 0.05). Osteolysis of the medial calcar was present in seven patients in this group. No signs for humeral loosening were found in both groups.

Conclusion

Impaction and screw fixation total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis using a stemless device provide reliable clinical results. The screw fixation seems to prevent osteolysis of the medial calcar.

Do the radiological changes seen at mid term follow up of stemless shoulder prosthesis affect outcome?

Background

The Eclipse® (Eclipse® is a trademark of Arthrex, Naples, Florida) stemless shoulder prosthesis offers the surgeon the advantage of bone stock preservation and at the same time avoids the drawbacks of a resurfacing arthroplasty. Previous studies have shown radiographic changes on serial follow up of the Eclipse prosthesis. This study attempts to assess the significance of these radiographic changes and effect of cuff related pathology on the mid-term outcome of the Eclipse prosthesis.

Methods

Between July 2005 and October 2008, 29 shoulders underwent shoulder arthroplasty with the Eclipse prosthesis; 23 shoulders, (seven women and 16 men) were available for the final follow up. The range of motion, Constant Score; age adjusted Constant Score, Subjective Shoulder Value and radiographs were assessed at serial follow-ups.

Results

Significant improvements were seen in the Constant Score (78.9 ±20.1) compared to pre-operative score (32.9 ±5.2); also forward elevation, abduction and external rotation improved to 142.9 ± 36.6 °, 135.2 ± 40.5 ° and 49.8 ± 21.9 ° at 72 months (p < 0.001). Radiolucent lines and localised osteopenia, did not statistically impact on the clinical outcome. Partial tears of the supraspinatus and subscapularis had a negative impact on the Subjective Shoulder Value (p < 0.05) Partial or complete tears of the subscapularis led to worse Constant Score on follow up (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The presence of radiolucent lines or localised osteopenia does not influence the mid term clinical outcome. Pre -operative partial supraspinatus tears or tears of the subscapularis lead to an inferior outcome.

Stress shielding of the humerus in press-fit anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: review and recommendations for evaluation

Uncemented press-fit humeral stems were developed with the goal of decreasing operative time, preserving bone stock, and easing revision. In recent years, short stems and stemless humeral implants have also become available. These press-fit humeral implants have varying designs that can lead to changes in stress distribution in the proximal humerus. Such stress shielding manifests as bony adaptations and may affect long-term functional outcome and the ability to perform revision. However, current studies of humeral fixation during total shoulder arthroplasty are complicated because a variety of classification systems have been used to report findings. The purpose of this report is to review the current literature on press-fit fixation of the humeral component during total shoulder arthroplasty and propose minimum requirements for radiographic descriptions of stress shielding.