Effect of impaction energy on dynamic bone strains, fixation strength, and seating of cementless acetabular cups

Vibratory insertion of press-fit acetabular components requires less force than a single blow technique

Aims

Periprosthetic fracture and implant loosening are two of the major reasons for revision surgery of cementless implants. Optimal implant fixation with minimal bone damage is challenging in this procedure. This pilot study investigates whether vibratory implant insertion is gentler compared to consecutive single blows for acetabular component implantation in a surrogate polyurethane (PU) model.

Methods

Acetabular components (cups) were implanted into 1 mm nominal under-sized cavities in PU foams (15 and 30 per cubic foot (PCF)) using a vibratory implant insertion device and an automated impaction device for single blows. The impaction force, remaining polar gap, and lever-out moment were measured and compared between the impaction methods.

Results

Impaction force was reduced by 89% and 53% for vibratory insertion in 15 and 30 PCF foams, respectively. Both methods positioned the component with polar gaps under 2 mm in 15 PCF foam. However, in 30 PCF foam, the vibratory insertion resulted in a clinically undesirable polar gap of over 2 mm. A higher lever-out moment was achieved with the consecutive single blow insertion by 42% in 15 PCF and 2.7 times higher in 30 PCF foam.

Conclusion

Vibratory implant insertion may lower periprosthetic fracture risk by reducing impaction forces, particularly in low-quality bone. Achieving implant seating using vibratory insertion requires adjustment of the nominal press-fit, especially in denser bone. Further preclinical testing on real bone tissue is necessary to assess whether its viscoelasticity in combination with an adjusted press-fit can compensate for the reduced primary stability after vibratory insertion observed in this study.

3-D finite element model of the impaction of a press-fitted femoral stem under various biomechanical environments

BACKGROUND

Uncemented femoral stem insertion into the bone is achieved by applying successive impacts on an inserter tool called "ancillary". Impact analysis has shown to be a promising technique to monitor the implant insertion and to improve its primary stability.

METHOD

This study aims to provide a better understanding of the dynamic phenomena occurring between the hammer, the ancillary, the implant and the bone during femoral stem insertion, to validate the use of impact analyses for implant insertion monitoring. A dynamic 3-D finite element model of the femoral stem insertion via an impaction protocol is proposed. The influence of the trabecular bone Young's modulus (Et), the interference fit (IF), the friction coefficient at the bone-implant interface (μ) and the impact velocity (v0) on the implant insertion and on the impact force signal is evaluated.

RESULTS

For all configurations, a decrease of the time difference between the two first peaks of the impact force signal is observed throughout the femoral stem insertion, up to a threshold value of 0.23 ms. The number of impacts required to reach this value depends on Et, v0 and IF and varies between 3 and 8 for the set of parameters considered herein. The bone-implant contact ratio reached after ten impacts varies between 60% and 98%, increases as a function of v0 and decreases as a function of IF, μ and Et.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the potential of an impact analyses-based method to monitor implant insertion and to retrieve bone-implant contact properties.

Dynamics of manual impaction instruments during total hip arthroplasty

Aims

Manual impaction, with a mallet and introducer, remains the standard method of installing cementless acetabular cups during total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aims to quantify the accuracy and precision of manual impaction strikes during the seating of an acetabular component. This understanding aims to help improve impaction surgical techniques and inform the development of future technologies.

Methods

Posterior approach THAs were carried out on three cadavers by an expert orthopaedic surgeon. An instrumented mallet and introducer were used to insert cementless acetabular cups. The motion of the mallet, relative to the introducer, was analyzed for a total of 110 strikes split into low-, medium-, and high-effort strikes. Three parameters were extracted from these data: strike vector, strike offset, and mallet face alignment.

Results

The force vector of the mallet strike, relative to the introducer axis, was misaligned by an average of 18.1°, resulting in an average wasted strike energy of 6.1%. Furthermore, the mean strike offset was 19.8 mm from the centre of the introducer axis and the mallet face, relative to the introducer strike face, was misaligned by a mean angle of 15.2° from the introducer strike face.

Conclusion

The direction of the impact vector in manual impaction lacks both accuracy and precision. There is an opportunity to improve this through more advanced impaction instruments or surgical training.

A novel primary stability test method for artificial acetabular shells considering vertical load during level walking and shell position

Uncemented acetabular shell primary stability is essential for optimal clinical outcomes. Push-out testing, rotation testing, and lever-out testing are major evaluation methods of primary stability between the shell and bone. However, these test methods do not consider shell loads during daily activity and shell installation angle. This study proposes a novel evaluation method of acetabular shell primary stability considering load during level walking and acetabular installation angles such as inclination and anteversion. To achieve this, a novel primary stability test apparatus was designed with a shell position of 40° acetabular inclination and 20° anteversion. The vertical load, corresponding to walking load, was set to 3 kN according to ISO 14242-1, which is the wear test standard for artificial hip joints. The vertical load was applied by an air cylinder controlled by a pressure-type electro-pneumatic proportional valve, with the vertical load value monitored by a load cell. Torque was measured when angular displacement was applied in the direction of extension during the application of vertical load. For comparison, we also measured torque using the traditional lever-out test. The novel primary stability test yielded significantly higher primary stabilities; 5.4 times greater than the lever-out test results. The novel primary stability test failure mode was more similar to the clinical failure than the traditional lever-out test. It is suggested that this novel primary stability test method, applying physiological walking loads and extension motions to the acetabular shell, better reflects in vivo primary stability than the traditional lever-out test.

Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design

INTRODUCTION

Successful press-fit implantation relies on an accurately reamed bone cavity. Inaccurate reaming can lead to a suboptimal press-fit risking fracture and cup deformation or excessive micromotion and loosening. Several factors may impact reaming accuracy including the reamer design, the surgeon's technique and the bone quality. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy of reaming techniques and the accuracy of a novel reamer design.

METHODS

Eighty composite bone models, half high density and half low density, were reamed with either a conventional or an additively manufactured reamer with a novel design employing either a straight or 'whirlwind' reaming technique. Reamed cavities were scanned using a 3D laser scanner and the median difference between achieved and expected diameters compared.

RESULTS

The novel reamer design was more accurate than the unused conventional reamer, using both whirlwind (0.1 mm (IQR 0-0.2) vs. 0.3 mm (IQR 0.3-0.4); p < 0.001) and straight techniques (0.3 mm (IQR 0.1-1.0) vs. 1.2 mm (IQR 1-1.6); p = 0.001). Whirlwind reaming was more accurate than straight reaming using both conventional (0.3 mm (IQR 0.3-0.4) vs. 1.2 mm (IQR 1-1.6); p < 0.0001) and single use reamers (0.1 mm (IQR 0-0.2) vs. 0.3 mm (IQR 0.1-1.0); p = 0.007). Reaming errors were higher in low-density bone compared to high-density bone, for both reamer types and reaming techniques tested (0.6 mm (IQR 0.3-1.5) vs. 0.3 mm (IQR 0.1-0.8); p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

We present a novel reamer design that demonstrates superior accuracy to conventional reamers in achieving the desired reaming diameter. Improved reaming accuracy was also demonstrated using both devices and in both bone models, using a 'whirlwind' technique. We recommend the use of this novel reamer design employing a 'whirlwind' technique to optimize reaming accuracy. Particular attention should be paid toward patients with lower bone quality which may be more susceptible to higher inaccuracies.

Bioreactor analyses of tissue ingrowth, ongrowth and remodelling around implants: An alternative to live animal testing

Introduction: Preclinical assessment of bone remodelling onto, into or around novel implant technologies is underpinned by a large live animal testing burden. The aim of this study was to explore whether a lab-based bioreactor model could provide similar insight. Method: Twelve ex vivo trabecular bone cylinders were extracted from porcine femora and were implanted with additively manufactured stochastic porous titanium implants. Half were cultured dynamically, in a bioreactor with continuous fluid flow and daily cyclic loading, and half in static well plates. Tissue ongrowth, ingrowth and remodelling around the implants were evaluated with imaging and mechanical testing. Results: For both culture conditions, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed bone ongrowth; widefield, backscatter SEM, micro computed tomography scanning, and histology revealed mineralisation inside the implant pores; and histology revealed woven bone formation and bone resorption around the implant. The imaging evidence of this tissue ongrowth, ingrowth and remodelling around the implant was greater for the dynamically cultured samples, and the mechanical testing revealed that the dynamically cultured samples had approximately three times greater push-through fixation strength (p < 0.05). Discussion: Ex vivo bone models enable the analysis of tissue remodelling onto, into and around porous implants in the lab. While static culture conditions exhibited some characteristics of bony adaptation to implantation, simulating physiological conditions with a bioreactor led to an accelerated response.

Influence of acetabular cup thickness on seating and primary stability in total hip arthroplasty

Insufficient primary stability of acetabular hip cups is a complication resulting in early cup loosening. Available cup designs vary in terms of wall thickness, potentially affecting implant fixation. This study investigated the influence of different wall thicknesses on the implantation process and the resulting primary stability using excised human acetabula. Implantations were performed using a powered impaction device providing consistent energy with each stroke. Two different wall thicknesses were compared in terms of seating progress, polar gap remaining after implantation, bone-to-implant contact area, cup deflection, and lever out moment. Thin-walled cups showed higher lever out resistance (p < 0.001) and smaller polar gaps (p < 0.001) with larger bone contact toward the dome of the cup (p < 0.001) compared to thick-walled cups. Small seating steps at the end of the impaction process were observed if a high number of strokes were needed to seat the cup (p = 0.045). A high number of strokes led to a strain release of the cup during the final strokes (p = 0.003). This strain release is indicative for over-impaction of the cup associated with bone damage and reduced primary stability. Adequate cup seating can be achieved with thin-walled cups with lower energy input in comparison to thicker ones. Thin-walled cups showed improved primary stability and enable implantation with lower energy input, reducing the risk of over-impaction and bone damage. Additional strokes should be avoided as soon as no further seating progress has been observed.

A parametric numerical analysis of femoral stem impaction

Press-fitted implants are implanted by impaction to ensure adequate seating, but without overloading the components, the surgeon, or the patient. To understand this interrelationship a uniaxial discretised model of the hammer/introducer/implant/bone/soft-tissues was developed. A parametric analysis of applied energy, component materials and geometry, and interactions between implant and bone and between bone and soft-tissues was performed, with implant seating and component stresses as outcome variables. To reduce the impaction effort (energy) required by the surgeon for implant seating and also reduce stresses in the hardware the following outcomes were observed: Reduce energy per hit with more hits / Increase hammer mass / Decrease introducer mass / Increase implant-bone resistance (eg stem roughness). Hardware stiffness and patient mechanics were found to be less important and soft tissue forces, due to inertial protection by the bone mass, were so low that their damage would be unlikely. This simple model provides a basic understanding of how stress waves travel through the impacted system, and an understanding of their relevance to implantation technique and component design.

A model of uniaxial implant seating by impaction

Implants anchored by press-fit are predominantly implanted by impaction. This method allows sufficiently high forces to be generated easily by the surgeon. Suitable impaction should provide adequate implant seating without damaging the patient (tissues), the implant and implantation system, or the surgeon. However, issues have been documented for all of these factors. In this study a model to predict implant seating is developed, given an applied impaction impulse, the mass of the accelerated components and the push-in resistance force. The model was validated against experimental data for a contemporary femoral stem implanted in a polyurethane foam surrogate for bone, with the input parameters varied. The model tended to overestimate seating but represented seating patterns well. The model can be used to estimate implant seating using easily measured parameters and could be useful in the design of implantation systems, and in optimising impaction strategies.

Influence of outer geometry on primary stability for uncemented acetabular shells in developmental dysplasia of the hip

Excellent primary stability of uncemented acetabular shells is essential to obtain successful clinical outcomes. However, in the case of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), aseptic loosening may be induced by instability due to a decrease of the contact area between the acetabular shell and host bone. The aim of this study was to assess the primary stability of two commercially-available acetabular shells, hemispherical and hemielliptical, in normal and DDH models. Synthetic bone was reamed using appropriate surgical reamers for each reaming condition (normal acetabular model). The normal acetabular model was also cut diagonally at 40° to create a dysplasia model. Stability of the acetabular components was evaluated by the lever-out test. In the normal acetabular model conditions, the maximum primary stabilities of hemispherical and hemielliptical shells were observed in the 1-mm under- and 1-mm over-reamed conditions, respectively, and the resulting stabilities were comparable. The lateral defect in the dysplasia model had an adverse effect on the primary stabilities of the two designs. The lever-out moment of the hemielliptical acetabular shell was 1.4 times greater than that of the hemispherical acetabular shell in the dysplasia model. The hemispherical shell is useful for the normal acetabular condition, and the hemielliptical shell for the severe dysplasia condition, in the context of primary stability.

Impaction technique influences implant stability in low-density bone model

Aims

Cementless acetabular components rely on press-fit fixation for initial stability. In certain cases, initial stability is more difficult to obtain (such as during revision). No current study evaluates how a surgeon’s impaction technique (mallet mass, mallet velocity, and number of strikes) may affect component fixation. This study seeks to answer the following research questions: 1) how does impaction technique affect a) bone strain generation and deterioration (and hence implant stability) and b) seating in different density bones?; and 2) can an impaction technique be recommended to minimize risk of implant loosening while ensuring seating of the acetabular component?

Methods

A custom drop tower was used to simulate surgical strikes seating acetabular components into synthetic bone. Strike velocity and drop mass were varied. Synthetic bone strain was measured using strain gauges and stability was assessed via push-out tests. Polar gap was measured using optical trackers.

Results

A phenomenon of strain deterioration was identified if an excessive number of strikes was used to seat a component. This effect was most pronounced in low-density bone at high strike velocities. Polar gap was reduced with increasing strike mass and velocity.

Conclusion

A high mallet mass with low strike velocity resulted in satisfactory implant stability and polar gap, while minimizing the risk of losing stability due to over-striking. Extreme caution not to over-strike must be exercised when using high velocity strikes in low-density bone for any mallet mass.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(7):386–393.

Patient and surgical variability in the primary stability of cementless acetabular cups: A finite element study

Aseptic loosening is the most common indication for revision of cementless acetabular cups and often depends on the primary stability achieved following surgery. Cup designs must be capable of achieving primary stability for a wide variety of individuals and surgical conditions to be successful. Typically, preclinical finite element (FE) testing of cups involves assessing the performance in a single patient and under a limited set of idealized conditions. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of patient and surgical parameters on the primary stability of an acetabular cup design in a set of subject-specific FE models. Interference fit was varied in a representative set of 12 patient-specific models of the implanted hemipelvis. Linear mixed models showed a significant association with micromotion for interference fit (P < .0001), acetabular bone elastic modulus (P < .001), native acetabular diameter (P  = .03), and the interference fit-elastic modulus interaction (P = .01). There were no significant associations between the polar gap and any of the parameters considered. The significant interference fit-elastic modulus interaction suggests that increasing the interference fit in patients with low bone quality leads to a greater reduction in micromotion than in patients with higher bone quality. However, the significant association between percentage bone yielding and interference fit (P < .0001) suggests a higher periacetabular fracture risk at higher interference fits. This work supports the development of preclinical testing of cup designs for the broad range patients and surgical conditions a cup may face following surgery.

Intraoperative complications in total hip arthroplasty using a new cementless femoral implant (SP-CL®)

BACKGROUND

Considering the excellent results already achieved in total hip arthroplasty (THA), new implants must be at least as safe as currently used implants and lead to longer survival. A new cementless femoral stem, SP-CL^®, has been introduced. The aim of this study is to evaluate intraoperative complications and assess the risk factors of THA with the SP-CL^® implant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All THA patients who were operated on using the SP-CL^® (LINK, Hamburg, Germany) implant between 2015 and 2018 were included in the analysis. Data were collected from medical records from national and hospital electronic databases. Radiological measurements were made from standard pre- and postoperative radiographs.

RESULTS

A total of 222 THA were performed using the SP-CL^® implant. The average age of the patients was 56 years (14-77 years). There were 1 transient sciatic nerve injury, 1 acetabular fracture, and 11 (5.0%) intraoperative femoral fractures (IFF), of which 7 were treated with cerclage wire or titanium band during the operation while the other fractures were treated conservatively. None of the IFF patients were revised due to fracture during the follow-up period (one revision due to infection). The radiographic morphology of proximal femur was associated with increased risk of IFF (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study demonstrate a 5% incidence of IFF when using the LINK SP-CL^® femoral stem in THA. The radiographic morphology of the proximal femur was an important predictor of IFF and should be assessed when using SP-CL^®.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.