Prospective Assessment of Peristomal Infections Using Objective Criteria

Enteral Nutrition Therapy: Historical Perspective, Utilization, and Complications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Enteral nutrition (EN) therapy can provide vital nutrition support for patients with various medical conditions as long as it is indicated and supported by ethical reasoning. This review seeks to offer a detailed account of the history of EN development, highlighting key milestones and recent advances in the field. Additionally, it covers common complications associated with EN and their management.

RECENT FINDINGS

After years of research and development, we have reached newer generations of enteral feeding formulations, more options for enteral tubes and connectors, and a better understanding of EN therapy challenges. Given the availability of many different formulas, selecting a feeding formula with the best evidence for specific indications for enteral feeding is recommended. Initiation of enteral feeding with standard polymeric formula remains the standard of care. Transition to small-bore connectors remains suboptimal. Evidence-based practices should be followed to recognize and reduce possible enteral feeding complications early.

Comparison of normal saline and antiseptic solution effect on the early peristomal infection rates of patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes: A randomized double-blind study

BACKGROUND

This study's aim was to compare the efficacy of normal saline (NS) with that of antiseptic solution in early peristomal skin care after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in terms of peristomal infection incidence.

METHODS

This was a randomized controlled double-blind study conducted at a university hospital between December 2019 and April 2021. All patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. The study population consisted of 64 patients randomized to group 1: NS (n = 31) and group 2: 0.1% polyhexamethylene biguanide and 0.1% betaine (PHMB-B; n = 33). Daily peristomal skin care was performed for 7 days, starting 24 h after insertion. Peristomal skin was evaluated by two blinded investigators before each dressing, and findings were recorded. Data analysis was performed with descriptive statistics; chi-square analysis; and exact, Shapiro-Wilk, Mann-Whitney U, and Cochran Q tests.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of peristomal infection rates (group 1: 12.9%, group 2: 9.07%; P > 0.05). Redness increased from day 4 in group 1 and day 5 in group 2, and exudate increased from day 5 in both groups. There is a statistical difference in the number of patients between the days when redness and exudate appear and increase.

CONCLUSION

Both NS and PHMB-B solutions can be preferred in peristomal care. However, NS may be the first choice for early peristomal care that does not show signs of infection, because it is not irritating and allergic and is cost-effective.

Home Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

While the history of nutrition support dates to the ancient world, modern home parenteral and enteral nutrition (HPEN) has been available since the 1960s. Home enteral nutrition is primarily for patients in whom there is a reduction in oral intake below the amount needed to maintain nutrition or hydration (i.e., oral failure), whereas home parenteral nutrition is used for patients when oral-enteral nutrition is temporarily or permanently impossible or absorption insufficient to maintain nutrition or hydration (i.e., intestinal failure). The development of home delivery of these therapies has revolutionized the field of clinical nutrition. The use of HPEN appears to be increasing on a global scale, and because of this, it is important for healthcare providers to understand all that HPEN entails to provide safe, efficacious, and cost-effective support to the HPEN patient. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the indications, patient requirements, monitoring, complications, and overall process of managing these therapies at home. Whereas some of the information in this article may be applicable to the pediatric patient, the focus is on the adult population.

Use of telehealth in home nutrition support: Challenges and advantages

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), after initially being detected in Wuhan, China in late 2019, quickly spread to most regions of the world, meeting World Health Organization criteria for a pandemic. Social distancing along with other measures implemented to control spread had a drastic impact on the provision of healthcare including deferred elective procedures and surgeries as well as delayed care and evaluation for emergent diagnoses such as heart attacks and strokes. In the home nutrition practice, patients began to delay routine laboratory tests and were canceling or deferring annual visits. Our group soon began to rapidly deploy telehealth to meet the needs of the home nutrition patients. Telehealth is not a new concept with descriptions of healthcare being provided at a distance with the use of telephone in the 1870s. However, widespread adoption has been limited because of regulation (licensure, prescriptions, credentialing, and privileges), lack of reimbursement, as well as adoption and availability of technology needed to carry out telehealth visits. As regulations and limits on reimbursements were waived during COVID-19 pandemic, our home nutrition practice began to evaluate core components of the care we provide for our patients and assess which could be successfully transitioned to telehealth. In addition to the history and regulation of telehealth, the current manuscript provides details regarding successful implementation of telehealth visits such as change management, selection of telehealth platform, scheduling and logistics, as well as carrying out the virtual visit including history and physical exam.

Redetermining the cutoff point of peristomal infection scoring: Methodological research

BACKGROUND

Peristomal infections are a frequently encountered problem in enteral nutrition that warrants prompt diagnosis and early antimicrobial treatment. Current practice lacks a consensus on an accepted measurement tool with acknowledged validity and reliability. The Peristomal Infection Scoring System is one such tool that shows promise, yet the optimal cutoff value remains to be determined.

METHODS

This methodological research was conducted with 54 adult participants to evaluate their peristomal areas in terms of infection by two nurse nutritionists and an expert physician in a simultaneous and independent manner, using peristomal infection scoring or the local signs and symptoms of infection. Performance was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic curve, interobserver reliability, and validity metrics.

RESULTS

According to the expert physician's opinion, the peristomal infection rate was 9.2%. The agreement between the observers using the Peristomal Infection Scoring System was κ = 1,000, P < .001. The peristomal infection scoring area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.98 (P < .001), and the best cutoff value was found to be 6 points, which correlated positively with a 0.88 coefficient (P < .001) and an accuracy of 98.1% (CI, 90.11%-99.95%).

CONCLUSION

The Peristomal Infection Scoring System with a cutoff value of 6 points is a valid and reliable instrument to diagnose peristomal infections. It can be easily used by healthcare professionals in all settings as needed.

Home Enteral Nutrition: Towards a Standard of Care

The purpose of this overview is to make the case for the establishment and publication of standards for home enteral nutrition (HEN) therapy in adult patients who require a long-term alternative to oral feeding. Overviews can provide a broad and often comprehensive summation of a topic area and, as such, have value for those coming to a subject for the first time. It will provide a broad summation, background and rationale, review specific considerations unique to HEN (tubes, products and supplies) and we describe a recent audit of seven HEN programs which highlights tube and process related challenges. Based on the overview of the literature and our experience with the audit we propose a way forward for best home enteral nutrition care.