A Pilot Study To Assess the Suitability of Riboflavin As a Surrogate Marker of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein in Healthy Participants

We recently showed that riboflavin is a selected substrate of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) over P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and demonstrated its prediction performance in preclinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies. The aim of this study was to investigate the suitability of riboflavin to assess BCRP inhibition in humans. First, we assessed the substrate potential of riboflavin toward other major drug transporters using established transfected cell systems. Riboflavin is a substrate for organic anion transporter (OAT)1, OAT3, and multidrug and toxin extrusion protein (MATE)2-K, with uptake ratios ranging from 2.69 to 11.6, but riboflavin is not a substrate of organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1, OATP1B3, organic cation transporter (OCT)2, and MATE1. The effects of BMS-986371, a potent in vitro inhibitor of BCRP (IC 50 0.40 μM), on the pharmacokinetics of riboflavin, isobutyryl carnitine, and arginine were then examined in healthy male adults (N = 14 or 16) after oral administration of methotrexate (MTX) (7.5 mg) and enteric-coated (EC) sulfasalazine (SSZ) (1000 mg) alone or in combination with BMS-986371 (150 mg). Oral administration of BMS-986371 increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUCs) of rosuvastatin and immediate-release (IR) SSZ to 1.38- and 1.51-fold, respectively, and significantly increased AUC(0-4h), AUC(0-24h), and C max of riboflavin by 1.25-, 1.14-, and 1.11-fold (P-values of 0.003, 0.009, and 0.025, respectively) compared with the MTX/SSZ EC alone group. In contrast, BMS-986371 did not significantly influence the AUC(0-24h) and C max values of isobutyryl carnitine and arginine (0.96- to 1.07-fold, respectively; P > 0.05). Overall, these data indicate that plasma riboflavin is a promising biomarker of BCRP that may offer a possibility to assess drug candidate as a BCRP modulator in early drug development. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Endogenous compounds that serve as biomarkers for clinical inhibition of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) are not currently available. This study provides the initial evidence that riboflavin is a promising BCRP biomarker in humans. For the first time, the value of leveraging the substrate of BCRP with acceptable prediction performance in clinical studies is shown. Additional clinical investigations with known BCRP inhibitors are needed to fully validate and showcase the utility of this biomarker.

ABCB1, ABCG2, ABCC1, ABCC2, and ABCC3 drug transporter polymorphisms and their impact on drug bioavailability: what is our current understanding?

INTRODUCTION

Interindividual differences in drug response are a frequent clinical challenge partly due to variation in pharmacokinetics. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are crucial determinants of drug disposition. They are subject of gene regulation and drug-interaction; however, it is still under debate to which extend genetic variants in these transporters contribute to interindividual variability of a wide range of drugs.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the current literature on the impact of genetic variants in ABCB1, ABCG2 as well as ABCC1, ABCC2, and ABCC3 on pharmacokinetics and drug response. The aim was to evaluate if results from recent studies would increase the evidence for potential clinically relevant pharmacogenetic effects.

EXPERT OPINION

Although enormous efforts have been made to investigate effects of ABC transporter genotypes on drug pharmacokinetics and response, the majority of studies showed only weak if any associations. Despite few unique results, studies mostly failed to confirm earlier findings or still remained inconsistent. The impact of genetic variants on drug bioavailability is only minor and other factors regulating the transporter expression and function seem to be more critical. In our opinion, the findings on the so far investigated genetic variants in ABC efflux transporters are not suitable as predictive biomarkers.

Therapeutic drugs modulate ATP-Binding cassette transporter-mediated transport of amyloid beta(1-42) in brain microvascular endothelial cells

Deposition of amyloid-β peptide (Aβ_(1-42)) is a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease. Clearance of Aβ_(1-42), across the blood-brain barrier (BBB), is mediated by ATP-binding Cassette (ABC) efflux transporters. Many therapeutic drugs inhibit ABC transporters, but little is known of the effect of therapeutic drugs on Aβ_(1-42) transport across BBB endothelial cells. The effects of selected, widely prescribed, therapeutic drugs on ABCB1, ABCC5 and ABCG2 activities were determined by measuring intracellular levels of calcein, GS-MF, and Hoechst 33342 respectively in primary porcine brain endothelial cells (PBECs). The ability of ABCB1, ABCC5 and ABCG2 to transport Aβ_(1-42) was determined using fluorescent Aβ_(1-42). The ability of the ABCB1, ABCC5 and ABCG2 inhibitor telmisartan to modify transcellular Aβ_(1-42) transport was investigated using PBEC monolayers housed in Transwell® inserts. Treatment of PBECs with ABC transporter inhibitory drugs (indomethacin, olanzapine, chlorpromazine, telmisartan, pantoprazole, quinidine, sulfasalazine and nefazodone) increased Aβ_(1-42) intracellular accumulation. Inhibition of ABCB1, ABCC5 and ABCG2 by telmisartan increased Aβ_(1-42) transport in the apical to basal direction and reduced its transport in basal to apical direction in PBEC monolayers. ABCB1, ABCC5 and ABCG2 mediate the efflux transport of Aβ_(1-42) in BBB endothelial cells. Inhibition of ABC transporters by therapeutic drugs, at plasma concentrations, could decrease Aβ_(1-42) clearance from brain, across BBB endothelial cells into blood, and potentially influence levels of the Aβ_(1-42) peptide within the brain.

ABCG2/BCRP: variants, transporter interaction profile of substrates and inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

ABCG2 has a broad substrate specificity and is one of the most important efflux proteins modulating pharmacokinetics of drugs, nutrients and toxicokinetics of toxicants. ABCG2 is an important player in transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions (tDDI). Areas covered: The aims of the review are i) to cover transporter interaction profile of substrates and inhibitors that can be utilized to test interaction of drug candidates with ABCG2, ii) to highlight main characteristics of in vitro testing and iii) to describe the structural basis of the broad substrate specificity of the protein. Preclinical data utilizing Abcg2/Bcrp1 knockouts and clinical studies showing effect of ABCG2 c.421C>A polymorphism on pharmacokinetics of drugs have provided evidence for a broad array of drug substrates and support drug - ABCG2 interaction testing. A consensus on using rosuvastatin and sulfasalazine as intestinal substrates for clinical studies is in the formation. Other substrates relevant to the therapeutic area can be considered. Monolayer efflux assays and vesicular transport assays have been extensively utilized in vitro. Expert opinion: Clinical substrates display complex pharmacokinetics due to broad interaction profiles with multiple transporters and metabolic enzymes. Substrate-dependent inhibition has been observed for several inhibitors. Harmonization of in vitro and in vivo testing makes sense. However, rosuvastatin and sulfasalazine are not efficiently transported in either MDCKII or LLC-PK1-based monolayers. Caco-2 monolayer assays and vesicular transport assays are potential alternatives.

ABCG2 c.421C>A polymorphism alters nifedipine transport to breast milk in hypertensive breastfeeding women

Nifedipine, a known substrate to breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2/BCRP), is used for the treatment of hypertension during breastfeeding. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ABCG2 c.421C>A on nifedipine transfer to breast milk (BM) in hypertensive women. Nineteen hypertensive breastfeeding women treated with 20 mg nifedipine every 12 hours were investigated. Blood and BM samples were collected simultaneously 15-30 days after delivery and at least 15 days after drug treatment. Patients genotyped as ABCG2 c.421CC showed nifedipine plasma and BM concentrations ranging from 8.32-178.1 ng/mL and 4.8-58.5 ng/mL, respectively. ABCG2 c.421C>A showed a trend towards significance (p = 0.0793) on nifedipine in BM, with concentrations approximately 3 times higher in the heterozygous 421 CA (29 ng/mL) in comparison to 421 CC (10.5 ng/mL). Nifedipine BM/plasma ratio was significantly lower in 421CC when compared to 421CA (p = 0.01). In conclusion, ABCG2 c.421C>A polymorphism is associated with higher transfer of nifedipine to BM.

Polymorphisms of the Multidrug Pump ABCG2: A Systematic Review of Their Effect on Protein Expression, Function, and Drug Pharmacokinetics

The widespread expression and polyspecificity of the multidrug ABCG2 efflux transporter make it an important determinant of the pharmacokinetics of a variety of substrate drugs. Null ABCG2 expression has been linked to the Junior blood group. Polymorphisms affecting the expression or function of ABCG2 may have clinically important roles in drug disposition and efficacy. The most well-studied single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), Q141K (421C>A), is shown to decrease ABCG2 expression and activity, resulting in increased total drug exposure and decreased resistance to various substrates. The effect of Q141K can be rationalized by inspection of the ABCG2 structure, and the effects of this SNP on protein processing may make it a target for pharmacological intervention. The V12M SNP (34G>A) appears to improve outcomes in cancer patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but the reasons for this are yet to be established, and this residue's role in the mechanism of the protein is unexplored by current biochemical and structural approaches. Research into the less-common polymorphisms is confined to in vitro studies, with several polymorphisms shown to decrease resistance to anticancer agents such as SN-38 and mitoxantrone. In this review, we present a systematic analysis of the effects of ABCG2 polymorphisms on ABCG2 function and drug pharmacokinetics. Where possible, we use recent structural advances to present a molecular interpretation of the effects of SNPs and indicate where we need further in vitro experiments to fully resolve how SNPs impact ABCG2 function.

Evaluation of Alteration in Hepatic and Intestinal BCRP Function In Vivo from ABCG2 c.421C>A Polymorphism Based on PBPK Analysis of Rosuvastatin

Polymorphism c.421C>A in the ABCG2 gene is thought to reduce the activity of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), a xenobiotic transporter, although it is not clear which organ(s) contributes to the polymorphism-associated pharmacokinetic change. The aim of the present study was to estimate quantitatively the influence of c.421C>A on intestinal and hepatic BCRP activity using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of rosuvastatin developed from clinical data and several in vitro studies. Simultaneous fitting of clinical data for orally and intravenously administered rosuvastatin, obtained in human subjects without genotype information, was first performed with the PBPK model to estimate intrinsic clearance for hepatic elementary process. The fraction of BCRP activity in 421CA and 421AA (f_ca and f_aa values, respectively) with respect to that in 421CC subjects was then estimated based on extended clearance concepts and simultaneous fitting to oral administration data for the three genotypes (421CC, 421CA, and 421AA). On the assumption that c.421C>A affects both intestinal and hepatic BCRP, clinical data in each genotype were well reproduced by the model, and the estimated terminal half-life was compatible with the observed values. The assumption that c.421C>A affects only either intestinal or hepatic BCRP gave poorer agreement with observed values. The f_aa values obtained on the former assumption were 0.48-0.54. Thus, PBPK model analysis enabled quantitative evaluation of alteration in BCRP activity owing to c.421C>A, and BCRP activity in 421AA was estimated as half that in 421CC.

Curcumin as an In Vivo Selective Intestinal Breast Cancer Resistance Protein Inhibitor in Cynomolgus Monkeys

To estimate the clinical impact of pharmacokinetic modulation via breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), in vivo approaches in nonclinical settings are desired in drug development. Clinical observation has identified curcumin as a promising candidate for in vivo selective BCRP inhibition, in addition to several well known inhibitors, such as lapatinib and pantoprazole. This study aimed to confirm the inhibitory efficacy of curcumin on gastrointestinal BCRP function in cynomolgus monkeys and to perform comparisons with lapatinib and pantoprazole. Oral area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and bioavailability of well known BCRP (sulfasalazine and rosuvastatin), P-glycoprotein (fexofenadine, aliskiren, and talinolol), and CYP3A (midazolam) substrates were investigated in the presence and absence of inhibitors. Oral exposures of sulfasalazine and rosuvastatin were markedly elevated by curcumin with minimal changes in systemic clearance, whereas pharmacokinetic alterations after fexofenadine, aliskiren, and talinolol oral exposure were limited. Curcumin increased oral midazolam exposure without affecting systemic clearance, presumably owing to partial inhibition of intestinal CYP3A. Lapatinib increased the oral AUC for sulfasalazine to a greater extent than curcumin did, whereas pantoprazole had a smaller effect. However, lapatinib also exerted significant effects on fexofenadine, failed to selectively discriminate between BCRP and P-glycoprotein inhibition, and had an effect on oral midazolam exposure comparable with that of curcumin. Thus, pharmacokinetic evaluation in monkeys demonstrated that pretreatment with curcumin as an in vivo selective BCRP inhibitor was more appropriate than pretreatment with lapatinib and pantoprazole for the assessment of the impact of BCRP on gastrointestinal absorption in nonrodent models.

Renal Drug Transporters and Drug Interactions

Transporters in proximal renal tubules contribute to the disposition of numerous drugs. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms of tubular secretion have been progressively elucidated during the past decades. Organic anions tend to be secreted by the transport proteins OAT1, OAT3 and OATP4C1 on the basolateral side of tubular cells, and multidrug resistance protein (MRP) 2, MRP4, OATP1A2 and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) on the apical side. Organic cations are secreted by organic cation transporter (OCT) 2 on the basolateral side, and multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) proteins MATE1, MATE2/2-K, P-glycoprotein, organic cation and carnitine transporter (OCTN) 1 and OCTN2 on the apical side. Significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may affect any of these transporters, altering the clearance and, consequently, the efficacy and/or toxicity of substrate drugs. Interactions at the level of basolateral transporters typically decrease the clearance of the victim drug, causing higher systemic exposure. Interactions at the apical level can also lower drug clearance, but may be associated with higher renal toxicity, due to intracellular accumulation. Whereas the importance of glomerular filtration in drug disposition is largely appreciated among clinicians, DDIs involving renal transporters are less well recognized. This review summarizes current knowledge on the roles, quantitative importance and clinical relevance of these transporters in drug therapy. It proposes an approach based on substrate-inhibitor associations for predicting potential tubular-based DDIs and preventing their adverse consequences. We provide a comprehensive list of known drug interactions with renally-expressed transporters. While many of these interactions have limited clinical consequences, some involving high-risk drugs (e.g. methotrexate) definitely deserve the attention of prescribers.

Incorporating High-Throughput Exposure Predictions With Dosimetry-Adjusted In Vitro Bioactivity to Inform Chemical Toxicity Testing

We previously integrated dosimetry and exposure with high-throughput screening (HTS) to enhance the utility of ToxCast HTS data by translating in vitro bioactivity concentrations to oral equivalent doses (OEDs) required to achieve these levels internally. These OEDs were compared against regulatory exposure estimates, providing an activity-to-exposure ratio (AER) useful for a risk-based ranking strategy. As ToxCast efforts expand (ie, Phase II) beyond food-use pesticides toward a wider chemical domain that lacks exposure and toxicity information, prediction tools become increasingly important. In this study, in vitro hepatic clearance and plasma protein binding were measured to estimate OEDs for a subset of Phase II chemicals. OEDs were compared against high-throughput (HT) exposure predictions generated using probabilistic modeling and Bayesian approaches generated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ExpoCast program. This approach incorporated chemical-specific use and national production volume data with biomonitoring data to inform the exposure predictions. This HT exposure modeling approach provided predictions for all Phase II chemicals assessed in this study whereas estimates from regulatory sources were available for only 7% of chemicals. Of the 163 chemicals assessed in this study, 3 or 13 chemicals possessed AERs < 1 or < 100, respectively. Diverse bioactivities across a range of assays and concentrations were also noted across the wider chemical space surveyed. The availability of HT exposure estimation and bioactivity screening tools provides an opportunity to incorporate a risk-based strategy for use in testing prioritization.

ABCG2 gene polymorphisms as risk factors for atorvastatin adverse reactions: a case-control study

AIM

To explore the association between dose-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of atorvastatin and polymorphisms of ABCG2, taking into account the influence of CYP3A4 and SLCO1B1 genes.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Sixty patients who experienced atorvastatin dose-related ADRs and 90 matched patients without ADRs were enrolled in the study. Genotyping for ABCG2 421C > A, CYP3A4*22, SLCO1B1 388A > G, SLCO1B1 521T > C variants was performed by real-time PCR.

RESULTS

Patients with ABCG2 421CA or AA genotypes had 2.9 times greater odds of developing atorvastatin dose-dependent ADRs (OR: 2.91; 95% CI: 1.22-6.95; p = 0.016) than those with ABCG2 421CC genotype. After adjustments for clinical and genetic risk factors, ABCG2 remained a statistically significant predictor of adverse drug reactions (OR: 2.75; 95% CI: 1.1-6.87; p = 0.03;). Also, carriers of SLCO1B1 521 TC or CC genotypes had 2.3 greater odds (OR: 1.03-4.98; 95% CI: 1.03-4.98; p = 0.043) of experiencing ADRs caused by atorvastatin in comparison with carriers of SLCO1B1 521 TT genotype.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated an association between atorvastatin-induced ADRs and genetic variants in the ABCG2 gene.

Intestinal and hepatic drug transporters: pharmacokinetic, pathophysiological, and pharmacogenetic roles

The efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapies are determined by the complex processes involved in the interactions between drugs with the human body, including pharmacokinetic aspects. Among pharmacokinetic factors, it has been recognized that drug transporters play critical roles for absorption, distribution and excretion of drugs, regulating the membrane transport of drugs. The vast amounts of information on drug transporters collected in the past 20 years have been organized according to biochemical, molecular, genetic, and clinical analyses. Novel technologies, public databases, and regulatory guidelines have advanced the use of such information in drug development and clinical practice. In this review, we selected some clinically important drug transporters expressed in the intestine and liver, and introduced the research history and current knowledge of their pharmacokinetic, pathophysiological, and pharmacogenetic implications.

Role of the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) in drug transport--an update

The human breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP, gene symbol ABCG2) is an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) efflux transporter. It was so named because it was initially cloned from a multidrug-resistant breast cancer cell line where it was found to confer resistance to chemotherapeutic agents such as mitoxantrone and topotecan. Since its discovery in 1998, the substrates of BCRP have been rapidly expanding to include not only therapeutic agents but also physiological substances such as estrone-3-sulfate, 17β-estradiol 17-(β-D-glucuronide) and uric acid. Likewise, at least hundreds of BCRP inhibitors have been identified. Among normal human tissues, BCRP is highly expressed on the apical membranes of the placental syncytiotrophoblasts, the intestinal epithelium, the liver hepatocytes, the endothelial cells of brain microvessels, and the renal proximal tubular cells, contributing to the absorption, distribution, and elimination of drugs and endogenous compounds as well as tissue protection against xenobiotic exposure. As a result, BCRP has now been recognized by the FDA to be one of the key drug transporters involved in clinically relevant drug disposition. We published a highly-accessed review article on BCRP in 2005, and much progress has been made since then. In this review, we provide an update of current knowledge on basic biochemistry and pharmacological functions of BCRP as well as its relevance to drug resistance and drug disposition.

Polymorphisms of the drug transporters ABCB1, ABCG2, ABCC2 and ABCC3 and their impact on drug bioavailability and clinical relevance

INTRODUCTION

Human ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters act as translocators of numerous substrates across extracellular and intracellular membranes, thereby contributing to bioavailability and consequently therapy response. Genetic polymorphisms are considered as critical determinants of expression level or activity and subsequently response to selected drugs.

AREAS COVERED

Here the influence of polymorphisms of the prominent ABC transporters P-glycoprotein (MDR1, ABCB1), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP, ABCG2) and the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) 2 (ABCC2) as well as MRP3 (ABCC3) on the pharmacokinetic of drugs and associated consequences on therapy response and clinical outcome is discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

ABC transporter genetic variants were assumed to affect interindividual differences in pharmacokinetics and subsequently clinical response. However, decades of medical research have not yielded in distinct and unconfined reproducible outcomes. Despite some unique results, the majority were inconsistent and dependent on the analyzed cohort or study design. Therefore, variability of bioavailability and drug response may be attributed only by a small amount to polymorphisms in transporter genes, whereas transcriptional regulation or post-transcriptional modification seems to be more critical. In our opinion, currently identified genetic variants of ABC efflux transporters can give some hints on the role of transporters at interfaces but are less suitable as biomarkers to predict therapeutic outcome.

The need for human breast cancer resistance protein substrate and inhibition evaluation in drug discovery and development: why, when, and how?

Although the multiplicity in transport proteins assessed during drug development is continuously increasing, the clinical relevance of the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) is still under debate. Here, our aim is to rationalize the need to consider BCRP substrate and inhibitor interactions and to define optimum selection and acceptance criteria between cell-based and vesicle-based assays in vitro. Information on the preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetics (PK), drug-drug interactions, and pharmacogenomics data was collated for 13 marketed drugs whose PK is reportedly associated with BCRP interaction. Clinical examples where BCRP impacts drug PK and efficacy appear to be rare and confounded by interactions with other transporters. Thirty-seven compounds were selected to be tested as BCRP substrates in a cell-based assay using MDCKII cells (Madin-Darby canine kidney cells) and 18 in membrane vesicles. Depending on the physicochemical compound properties, we observed both in vitro systems to give false-negative readouts. In addition, the inhibition potential of 19 compounds against BCRP was assessed in vesicles and in MDCKII cells, where we observed significant system and substrate-dependent IC50 values. Therefore, neither of the two test systems is superior to the other. Instead, one system may offer advantages under certain situations (e.g., low permeability) and thus should be selected based on the physicochemical compound properties. Finally, given the clinical relevance of BCRP, we propose that its evaluation should remain issue-driven: for low permeable, low bioavailable drugs, in particular when other more common processes do not allow a mechanistic understanding of any unexpected absorption or brain disposition, and for drugs with a low therapeutic window.

CYP2C9 and ABCG2 polymorphisms as risk factors for developing adverse drug reactions in renal transplant patients taking fluvastatin: a case-control study

AIM

To investigate whether an association exists between fluvastatin-induced adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and polymorphisms in genes encoding the metabolizing enzyme CYP2C9 and the drug transporter ABCG2 in renal transplant recipients (RTRs).

MATERIALS & METHODS

Fifty-two RTRs that experienced fluvastatin ADRs and 52 controls matched for age, gender, dose of fluvastatin and immunosuppressive use were enrolled in the study. Genotyping for CYP2C9*2, *3 and ABCG2 421C>A variants was performed by real-time PCR.

RESULTS

CYP2C9 homozygous and heterozygous mutant allele (*2 or *3) carriers had 2.5-times greater odds of developing adverse effects (χ² = 4.370; degrees of freedom = 1; p = 0.037; φ = 0.21, odds ratio [OR]: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.05-5.71). Patients who were the carriers of at least one mutant CYP2C9 allele (*2 or *3) and who were receiving CYP2C9 inhibitors, had more than six-times greater odds of having adverse effects than those without the inhibitor included in their therapy (p = 0.027; OR: 6.59; 95% CI: 1.24-35.08). Patients with ABCG2 421CA or AA (taken together) had almost four-times greater odds of developing adverse effects than those with ABCG2 421CC genotype (χ² = 6.190; degrees of freedom = 1; p = 0.013; φ = 0.24, OR: 3.81; 95% CI: 1.27-11.45). Patients with A allele had 2.75-times (95% CI: 1.02-7.40) greater odds of developing adverse effects than those with C allele.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary data demonstrate an association between fluvastatin-induced ADRs in RTRs and genetic variants in the CYP2C9 and ABCG2 genes.

Pharmacogenetics of membrane transporters: a review of current approaches

This chapter provides a review of the pharmacogenetics of membrane transporters, including ABC transporters and OATPs. Membrane transporters are heavily involved in drug disposition, by actively transporting substrate drugs between organs and tissues. As such, polymorphisms in the genes encoding these proteins may have a significant effect on the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and activity of compounds. Although few drug transporter polymorphisms have transitioned from the bench to the bedside, this chapter discusses clinical development of transporter pharmacogenetic markers. Finally, development of SLCO1B1 genotyping to avoid statin induced adverse drug reactions is discussed as a model case for transporter pharmacogenetics clinical development.

Effect of P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein inhibition on the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib in rats

The aim of this study was to elucidate the roles of P-glycoprotein (P-gp/ABCB1) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) in the plasma concentration, biliary excretion, and distribution to the liver, kidney, and brain of sunitinib. The pharmacokinetics of sunitinib was examined in rats treated with PSC833 (valspodar) and pantoprazole, potent inhibitors of P-gp and BCRP, respectively. The sunitinib concentrations in plasma, bile, liver, kidney, and brain were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. It was found that the area under the concentration-time curve for 4 hours (AUC0-4) and maximum concentration (Cmax) of sunitinib administered intraintestinally were significantly increased by pretreatment with PSC833 or pantoprazole. Each inhibitor markedly reduced the biliary excretion of sunitinib for 60 minutes after an intravenous administration and significantly increased the distribution of sunitinib to the liver as well as kidney. In addition, the brain distribution of sunitinib was significantly increased by PSC833 but not pantoprazole, and coadministration of both inhibitors further enhanced the accumulation of sunitinib in the brain. These results demonstrate that plasma concentrations of sunitinib and the biliary excretion and distribution to the kidney, liver, and brain of sunitinib are influenced by pharmacologic inhibition of P-gp and/or BCRP.

Effect of the ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2 on pharmacokinetics: experimental findings and clinical implications

INTRODUCTION

The ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2 can actively extrude a broad range of endogenous and exogenous substrates across biological membranes. Thereby, ABCG2 limits oral drug bioavailability, mediates hepatobiliary and renal excretion and participates functionally in the blood-brain barrier.

AREAS COVERED

The paper provides a review of the clinical evidence of the role of ABCG2 in the bioavailability and brain disposition of drugs. It also sheds light on the value of experimental/preclinical data in predicting the role of ABCG2 in pharmacokinetics in humans.

EXPERT OPINION

Experimental studies indicate that ABCG2 may limit the oral bioavailability and brain penetration of many drugs. ABCG2 has also been recognized as an important determinant of the disposition of some drugs in humans. For example, loss-of-function variants of ABCG2 affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rosuvastatin in a clinically significant manner. Moreover, clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions have been attributed to ABCG2 inhibition. However, examples from human studies are still rare compared with the overwhelming evidence from experimental studies. The large degree of functional redundancy of ABCG2 with other transporters such as P-glycoprotein may explain the rare occurrence of ABCG2-dependent drug-drug interactions in humans. Providing clinicians with consolidated information on the clinically relevant interactions of drugs with ABCG2 remains a matter of future exploration.

Impact of drug transporter pharmacogenomics on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability - considerations for drug development

INTRODUCTION

Drug transporter proteins are expressed on the cell membrane, regulating substrate exposure in systemic circulation and/or peripheral tissues. Genetic polymorphism of drug transporter genes encoding these proteins could alter the functional activity and/or protein expression, having effects on absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME), efficacy and adverse effects.

AREAS COVERED

The authors provide the reader with an overview of the pharmacogenetics (PGx) of 12 membrane transporters. The clinical literature is summarized as to the quantitative significance on pharmacokinetics (PK) and implications on pharmacodynamics (PD) and adverse effects, due to transporter influence on intracellular drug concentrations.

EXPERT OPINION

Unlike polymorphisms for cytochrome P450s (CYPs) resulting in large magnitude of PK variation, genetic mutations for membrane transporters are typically less than threefold alteration in systemic PK for drugs with a few exceptions. However, substantially greater changes in intracellular drug levels may result. We are aware of 1880 exome variants in 12 of the best-studied transporters to date, and nearly 40% of these change the amino acid. However, the functional consequences of most of these variants remain to be determined, and have only been empirically evaluated for a handful. To the extent that genetic polymorphisms impact ADME, it is a variable that will contribute to ethnic differences due to substantial frequency differences for the known variants.

Membrane transporters in drug development

Membrane transporters have wide, but specific tissue distributions. They can impact on multiple endogenous and xenobiotic processes. Knowledge and awareness within the pharmaceutical industry of their impact on drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination (ADME) and drug safety is growing rapidly. Clinically important transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) have been observed. Up to nine diverse transporters are implicated in the DDIs of a number of widely prescribed drugs, posing a significant challenge to the pharmaceutical industry. There is a complex interplay between multiple transporters and/or enzymes in the ADME and pharmacogenomics of drugs. Integrating these different mechanisms to understand their relative contributions to ADME is a key challenge. Many different factors complicate the study of membrane transporters in drug development. These include a lack of specific substrates and inhibitors, non-standard in vitro tools, and competing/complementary mechanisms (e.g. passive permeability and metabolism). Discovering and contextualizing the contribution of membrane transporters to drug toxicity is a significant new challenge. Drug interactions with key membrane transporters are routinely assessed for central nervous system (CNS) drug discovery therapies, but are not generally considered across the wider drug discovery. But, there is interest in utilizing membrane transporters as drug delivery agents. Computational modeling approaches, notably physiology-based/pharmacokinetic (PB/PK) modeling are increasingly applied to transporter interactions, and permit integration of multiple ADME mechanisms. Because of the range of tissues and transporters of interest, robust transporter, in vitro to in vivo, scaling factors are required. Empirical factors have been applied, but absolute protein quantitation will probably be required.

Functional significance of genetic polymorphisms in P-glycoprotein (MDR1, ABCB1) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP, ABCG2)

Recent pharmacogenomic/pharmacogenetic (PGx) studies have disclosed important roles for drug transporters in the human body. Changes in the functions of drug transporters due to drug/food interactions or genetic polymorphisms, for example, are associated with large changes in pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of substrate drugs, leading to changes in drug response and side effects. This information is extremely useful not only for drug development but also for individualized treatment. Among drug transporters, the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are expressed in most tissues in humans, and play protective roles; reducing drug absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, enhancing drug elimination into bile and urine, and impeding the entry of drugs into the central nervous system and placenta. In addition to PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) issues, ABC transporters are reported as etiologic and prognostic factors (or biomarkers) for genetic disorders. Although a consensus has not yet been reached, clinical studies have demonstrated that the PGx of ABC transporters influences the overall outcome of pharmacotherapy and contributes to the pathogenesis and progression of certain disorders. This review explains the impact of PGx in ABC transporters in terms of PK/PD, focusing on P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP).

Drug transporters in drug efficacy and toxicity

Drug transporters are now widely acknowledged as important determinants governing drug absorption, excretion, and, in many cases, extent of drug entry into target organs. There is also a greater appreciation that altered drug transporter function, whether due to genetic polymorphisms, drug-drug interactions, or environmental factors such as dietary constituents, can result in unexpected toxicity. Such effects are in part due to the interplay between various uptake and efflux transporters with overlapping functional capabilities that can manifest as marked interindividual variability in drug disposition in vivo. Here we review transporters of the solute carrier (SLC) and ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamilies considered to be of major importance in drug therapy and outline how understanding the expression, function, and genetic variation in such drug transporters will result in better strategies for optimal drug design and tissue targeting as well as reduce the risk for drug-drug interactions and adverse drug responses.

In vitro and in vivo evidence for the importance of breast cancer resistance protein transporters (BCRP/MXR/ABCP/ABCG2)

The breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) is a member of the G-subfamiliy of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC)-transporter superfamily. This half-transporter is assumed to function as an important mechanism limiting cellular accumulation of various compounds. In context of its tissue distribution with localization in the sinusoidal membrane of hepatocytes, and in the apical membrane of enterocytes ABCG2 is assumed to function as an important mechanism facilitating hepatobiliary excretion and limiting oral bioavailability, respectively. Indeed functional assessment performing mouse studies with genetic deletion or chemical inhibition of the transporter, or performing pharmacogenetic studies in humans support this assumption. Furthermore the efflux function of ABCG2 has been linked to sanctuary blood tissue barriers as described for placenta and the central nervous system. However, in lactating mammary glands ABCG2 increases the transfer of substrates into milk thereby increasing the exposure to potential noxes of a breastfed newborn. With regard to its broad substrate spectrum including various anticancer drugs and environmental carcinogens the function of ABCG2 has been associated with multidrug resistance and tumor development/progression. In terms of cancer biology current research is focusing on the expression and function of ABCG2 in immature stem cells. Recent findings support the notion that the physiological function of ABCG2 is involved in the elimination of uric acid resulting in higher risk for developing gout in male patients harboring genetic variants. Taken together ABCG2 is implicated in various pathophysiological and pharmacological processes.

Drug transport by breast cancer resistance protein

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

The ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2 is a well-known major mediator of multi-drug resistance in cancers. Beyond multi-drug resistance, experimental and recent clinical studies demonstrate a role for ABCG2 as a determinant of drug pharmacokinetic, safety and efficacy profiles.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The clinical evidence of the role of ABCG2 in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics is reviewed. Key questions that arise from the perspective of preclinical drug evaluation are addressed, including the structure of ABCG2 and mechanisms of drug-transporter interactions, mechanisms responsible for the polyspecificity of ABCG2, methods suitable for studying drug-ABCG2 interactions in vitro and in silico prediction of ABCG2 substrates and inhibitors.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

An update on current knowledge of the importance of ABCG2 in drug disposition with special emphasis on drug development.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The field of drug-ABCG2 interaction is rapidly advancing and beginning to expand into clinical practice. However, the structural understanding of drug binding and transport by ABCG2 is still incomplete. Incorporation of novel concepts of drug-transporter interactions such as electrostatic funneling might help explain the multispecificity of ABCG2 and enable in silico predictions.