Role of radiation therapy in the treatment of resectable rectal adenocarcinoma

A brief history of contact X-ray brachytherapy 50 kVp

Contact X ray brachytherapy 50 kVp was initiated in the 1930s with the Siemens unit and popularized with the Philips unit in the 1950s. A renaissance was seen in the early 2000s with the Intrabeam™ unit for breast IORT. Presently the Papillon™ systems thanks to its high dose rate (>10Gy/mn) can be used to treat breast (IORT), skin, eyelid and rectal cancers. Future developments are expected to consolidate the place of contact radiotherapy as a safe and efficient treatment for accessible early tumors.

Prognostic significance of adjuvant radiation therapy in adenocarcinoma of the cecum

Purpose

Local recurrence is a common failure pattern in adenocarcinoma of the cecum. This study aimed to investigate the potential role of adjuvant radiation therapy on oncologic outcomes of patients with adenocarcinoma of the cecum.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was carried out at three large tertiary university hospitals. We analyzed the characteristics, prognostic factors, and survival of 162 patients with adenocarcinoma of the cecum that were treated and followed up between 2000 and 2013. All the patients had undergone a right hemicolectomy and received chemotherapy with (n = 48) or without (n = 114) adjuvant radiation therapy.

Results

The subjects were 65 females and 97 males with a median age of 56 years (range, 17 to 90 years) at diagnosis. The 5-year local control (LC), disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 72.7%, 57.2%, and 62.6% respectively. In a multivariate analysis, age, tumor stage, node stage, and adjuvant radiation therapy were determined to be independent prognostic factors. Age more than 55 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06–0.32; p = 0.003], T4 stage (HR = 6.8; 95% CI, 3.07–15.36; p < 0.001), node positive disease (HR = 4.2; 95% CI, 1.94–9.13; p < 0.001), and the absence of adjuvant radiation therapy (HR = 3.0; 95% CI, 1.39–6.46; p = 0.005) had a negative influence on OS.

Conclusion

Adjuvant radiation therapy significantly improves DFS and OS in patients with adenocarcinoma of the cecum.

Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is associated with a better prognosis

In patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) who received neoadjuvant therapy and pancreatectomy, pathologic complete response (pCR) is rarely observed and the prognostic significance of pCR is not clear. In this study, we identified 11 patients with pCR (2.5%) from 442 patients with PDA who received neoadjuvant treatment and pancreatectomy from 1995 to 2010. There were 6 men and 5 women, with a median age of 61 years. Four patients had either synchronous or history of extrapancreatic cancer. Five patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation, and 6 received chemoradiation alone. Ten patients had pancreaticoduodenectomy, and 1 had distal pancreatectomy. Scar and chronic pancreatitis consistent with therapy effect were present in all cases (100%). Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) 3/carcinoma in situ was present in 5 cases, and PanIN1 and PanIN2 in 5 cases. However, no residual invasive carcinoma or lymph node metastasis was identified in all cases. Follow-up information was available in 10 patients. Follow-up time ranges from 6 to 194 months (median, 63 months). During the follow-up, 3 patients died of other causes, and 1 developed a second primary PDA in the tail of the pancreas at 84 months after the initial pancreaticoduodenectomy and died at 105 months after the initial diagnosis of PDA. The other 6 patients were alive with no evidence of disease. Patients with pCR had a better survival than did those who had posttherapy stage I or IIA disease (P < .001). Patients with PDA who received neoadjuvant therapy and had pCR in pancreatectomy are rare but have a better prognosis.

Successful management of osteoradionecrotic precoccygeal defect with the free latissimus dorsi muscle flap: case report and literature review

Perineal wound complications following abdominoperineal resection (APR) are still frequent and most troublesome complications. We report the case of a 79-year-old male found to have the huge precoccygeal defect with infection after APR for rectal carcinoma. Before surgery, the patient received a complete course of chemoradiation therapy to treat for downgrade staging of the rectal malignancy. Extensive debridement of the perianal wound was performed for three times, followed by perianal reconstruction and packing and augmentation of the precoccygeal dead space with free latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle flap. Although persisted wound infection was still observed after reconstruction, the patient still led a good result after one time of further debridement and split-thickness skin graft. We selected free LD muscle flap to fill and seal off the large pelvic dead space without the needs to change the jackknife position of the patient after debridement. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reported in the literature with the radiation-associated perianal wound infection after APR reconstructed successfully by free LD muscle flap.

Radiotherapy in the treatment of resectable rectal adenocarcinoma

The goal of treatment is to cure whereas maintaining sphincter function and minimizing toxicity. Although the mainstay of the treatment is surgery, radiotherapy (RT) is used in a substantial proportion of patients depending on the location and extent of the tumor. The aim of this article is to discuss the role of RT in patients with resectable rectal adenocarcinoma. This article is a review of the pertinent literature. Results show that patients with T1N0 exophytic, well to moderately differentiated, mobile tumors < or = 3 cm in diameter may be treated with either transanal excision or endocavitary RT. The probability of cure with either approach is approximately 80% to 90% and depends on selection criteria. The advantages of endocavitary RT are that it is an outpatient procedure requiring, at most, local anesthesia and is suitable for elderly, infirm patients. The disadvantage is that few of these treatment units are available. Patients who experience a local-regional recurrence may be surgically salvaged. Patients who undergo transanal excision and have unfavorable pathologic findings including equivocal or close margins, poor differentiation, invasion of the muscularis propria, and/or endothelial-lined space invasion have a high risk of local-regional recurrence after surgery alone. The addition of postoperative RT improves the likelihood of cure from 85% to 90%. Patients presenting with unfavorable tumors that are borderline resectable with a transanal excision may be downstaged with preoperative RT and rendered suitable for a wide local excision. The addition of concomitant chemotherapy probably enhances downstaging and may improve the likelihood of sphincter preservation. Patients with T3 and/or N1 rectal cancers have a relatively high probability of local-regional recurrence after surgery alone. Preoperative RT and postoperative RT combined with adjuvant chemotherapy have been shown to significantly reduce the risk of local-regional recurrence and improve survival. Whether preoperative RT alone or combined with chemotherapy is more efficacious than postoperative chemoradiation remains unclear. Endocavitary RT or transanal excision is suitable for patients with T1N0 cancers. Depending on tumor location and extent, adjuvant RT may improve the probability of local-regional control and survival for patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinomas.

Contact X-ray therapy for rectal cancer: experience in Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, 2002-2006

PURPOSE

To report the results of using contact X-ray (CXR), which has been used in the Centre-Lacassagne since 2002 for rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 44 patients were treated between 2002 and 2006 using four distinct clinical approaches. Patients with Stage T1N0 tumors were treated with transanal local excision (TLE) and adjuvant CXR (45 Gy in three fractions) (n = 7). The 11 inoperable (or who had refused surgery) patients with Stage T2-T3 disease were treated with CXR plus external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Those with Stage T3N0-N2 tumors were treated with preoperative CXR plus EBRT (with or without concurrent chemotherapy) followed by surgery (n = 21). Finally, the patients with Stage T2 disease were treated with CXR plus EBRT followed by TLE (n = 5).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 25 months. In the 7 patients who underwent TLE first, no local failure was observed, and their anorectal function was good. Of the 11 inoperable patients who underwent CXR plus EBRT alone, 10 achieved local control. In the third group (preoperative CXR plus EBRT), anterior resection was performed in 16 of 21 patients. Complete sterilization of the operative specimen was seen in 4 cases (19%). No local recurrence occurred. Finally, of the 5 patients treated with CXR plus EBRT followed by TLE, a complete or near complete clinical response was observed in all. TLE with a R0 resection margin was performed in all cases. The rectum was preserved with good function in all 5 patients.

CONCLUSION

These early results have confirmed that CXR combined with surgery (or alone with EBRT) can play a major role in the conservative and curative treatment of rectal cancer.

Complication after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum

Treatment of rectal cancer commonly involves pre-operative short-term external beam radiotherapy along with curative surgery. We describe a case that was treated with the standard multi-modality treatment but developed some very unusual complications.

Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy for colon carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this report was to review the role of adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the pertinent literature.

RESULTS

Data suggested that locoregional postoperative RT improves both local control and survival for patients with T4N0-N1 tumors. There also may be a benefit for patients with T3N1-N2 tumors, but the data were equivocal. Whole abdominal RT may result in a similar benefit but is associated with increased toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative RT should be considered for patients with T4N0-N1 colon carcinoma. Locoregional fields should be used.