A phase II study of radiofrequency ablation of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer with hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy

Phase I Safety and Feasibility Pilot of Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy in a Rural Catchment Area Using The Codman Vascular Catheter with The Medtronic SynchroMed II Pump for Intrahepatic Cancers

BACKGROUND

Discontinuation of the Codman 3000 pump in 2018 left no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved hepatic artery infusion (HAI) device for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (uCLM) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uIHC). Historically, HAI has been performed at academic medical centers in large metropolitan areas, which are often inaccessible to rural patients. Consequently, feasibility of dissemination of HAI to rural populations is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Under an FDA investigational device exemption, we opened the only HAI program in Kentucky and enrolled patients with uCLM and uIHC in a phase I clinical trial. The trial examined the safety of the hybrid Codman catheter/Medtronic SynchroMed II pump (hCMP) combination, defined as successful completion of one cycle of HAI chemotherapy. Rural feasibility was assessed by number of missed pump fills appointments.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients (n = 17 uCLM, n = 4 uIHC) underwent hCMP implantation before accrual was stopped early owing to FDA approval of the Intera 3000 pump. 20/21 (95%) patients met the primary safety endpoint. Serious adverse events (AEs) included a grade 5 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection (n = 1) and a grade 3 catheter erosion into the bowel (n = 1). Biliary sclerosis developed in two patients (9.5%). Median distance to infusion center was 47.6 miles (2-138 miles), and 62% were from Appalachia, yet there were no missed pump fill appointments. The 2-year overall survival was 82.4% (uCLM) and 50% (uIHC).

CONCLUSIONS

The hCMP device had an acceptable safety profile. Despite the complexity of starting a new HAI program, early results showed feasibility for HAI delivery in a rural catchment area and comparable outcomes to larger urban-based HAI centers.

Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: improvement in outcomes and similar cost

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of laparoscopic versus open hepatic resection (OHR) exclusively for hepatocellular carcinoma in terms of morbidity and cost.

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic hepatic resection (LHR) has become more prevalent with recent improvements in instrumentation and surgeon experience.

METHODS

A review of multicenter, prospectively collected hepatobiliary databases from three institutions was performed from 12/1990 to 12/2009. Prospective evaluation of all patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular cancer was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 354 patients who had resections for Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were analyzed, 100 were performed laparoscopically. The two groups were similar in terms of demographics and comorbidities. Evaluation of outcomes showed significantly higher intraoperative estimated blood loss although postoperative transfusion rates were similar. The incidence of any complication (44 vs 44%, p = 0.23) and 90-day mortality (6 vs 6%, p = 0.8) were similar between the two groups, with a similar reoperation rate (4.0 vs. 2.4%; p = 0.9). Using Cox regression analysis, the laparoscopic approach had no effect on disease-free interval (OR 1.4, CI 0.31-6.3, p = 0.66) or overall survival (HR 1.2, CI 0.59-2.5 p = 0.6). Length of stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group 6.2 vs. 9.3 days (p = 0.001). Adjusted operative charges ($41 vs. $39 k, p = 0.601) and adjusted total hospital charges ($71 vs. $82 k, p = 0.368) were similar in LHR versus OHR.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms previous literature showing comparable perioperative outcomes and recurrence. We further show comparable cost with laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC.

Patterns of failure in colorectal patients with liver metastases after yttrium-90 radioembolization

OBJECTIVES

To assess patterns of failure and factors affecting recurrence patterns in colorectal cancer patients treated with Y-labeled resin microspheres for metastatic liver disease.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 30 colorectal patients treated with Yttrium-90 radioembolization and assessed follow-up computed tomography scans and positron emission tomography scans to determine disease outcomes. All patients were included in survival analysis. Twenty-six patients with hepatic metastases were assessed for patterns of failure after radioembolization treatment and grouped into 3 patterns: (1) hepatic; (2) extrahepatic; and (3) intrahepatic and extrahepatic.

RESULTS

The median overall survival and progression-free survival for all colorectal patients treated with radioembolization was 9.4 and 3.2 months, respectively. Overall survival and progression-free survival were not significantly different between patterns of failure (P=0.43 and 0.26, respectively). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated a trend toward the predictive value of tumor volume in determining patterns of failure. Smaller tumor volumes had a higher predictive probability for extrahepatic failure than larger tumor volumes (P=0.057). Tumor volumes <300 mL were predictive for extrahepatic failure patterns compared with hepatic recurrence (P=0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Radioembolization with Y-labeled resin microspheres continues to be an effective salvage treatment for colorectal liver metastases. Analysis of patterns of radiologic failure demonstrated that patients treated by radioembolization develop a greater proportion of extrahepatic failure. Tumor volumes >300 mL were predictive for hepatic recurrence, suggesting that increased dosing or retreatment of these lesions may lead to improved hepatic control of disease and better patient outcomes.

Impact of hepatectomy margin on survival following resection of colorectal metastasis: the role of adjuvant therapy and its effects

INTRODUCTION

The optimal width of microscopic margin and the use of adjuvant therapy after a positive margin for hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRCLM) has not been conclusively determined. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the influence of width of surgical margin and adjunctive therapy upon disease free and overall survival.

METHODS

All patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRCLM from 1997 to 2012 were identified from a prospectively maintained, IRB approved database. Patients were divided into four subgroups based on the parenchymal margin: positive, <0.1 cm, 0.1 cm-1 cm, and >1 cm.

RESULTS

A total of 373 patients were included for analysis with a median follow up of 26 months (range 9-103 months) and a median overall survival of 53 months. The resection margin was positive (26 patients median OS 24 months), <0.1 cm (48 patients median OS 36 mon), 0.1 cm-1 cm (82 patients median OS 44 months), and >1 cm (217 patients median OS 64 months). The most common adjunctive therapy was chemotherapy, hepatic arterial therapy, or local. Patients with positive margins also had the shortest disease free survival (DFS), 16 months. The DFS was similar amongst the other margin groups (<0.1 cm: 21 months, 0.1-1 cm: 22 months, >1 cm 25 months). Hepatectomy margin independently influenced survival (p = 0.017) and disease free survival (p = 0.034). Patients with negative margins has similar overall recurrence rates (p = 0.36) and survival rates (p = 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

A positive surgical margin indicates a worse overall biology of disease for patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRCLM, and appropriate multi-disciplinary therapy should be considered in this high risk patient population. Marginal width if a complete resection has been achieved does not adversely effect overall surgical in patients with CRCLM.

Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common malignant tumour and the third leading cause of cancer deaths in USA. For advanced CRC, the liver is the first site of metastatic disease; approximately 50 % of patients with CRC will develop liver metastases either synchronously or metachronously within 2 years after primary diagnosis. Hepatic resection (HR) is the only curative option, but only 15-20% of patients with liver metastases from CRC (CRLMs) are suitable for surgical standard treatment. In patients with unresectable CRLMs downsizing chemotherapy can improve resectability (16%). Modern systemic chemotherapy represents the only significant treatment for unresectable CRLMs. However several loco-regional treatments have been developed: hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), cryosurgical ablation (CSA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation and selective internal radion treatment (SIRT). During the past decade RFA has superseded other ablative therapies, due to its low morbidity, mortality, safety and patient acceptability.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to systematically review the role of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of CRLMs.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed electronic searches in the following databases:CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Current trials were identified through the Internet using the Clinical-Trials.gov site (to January 2, 2012) and ASCO Proceedings. The reference lists of identified trials were reviewed for additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs), quasi-randomised or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing RFA to any other therapy for CRLMs were included. Observational study designs including comparative cohort studies comparing RFA to another intervention, single arm cohort studies or case control studies have been included if they have: prospectively collected data, ten or more patients; and have a mean or median follow-up time of 24 months. Patients with CRLMs who have no contraindications for RFA. Patients with unresectable extra-hepatic disease were also included.Trials have been considered regardless of language of origin.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A total of 1144 records were identified through the above electronic searching. We included 18 studies: 10 observational studies, 7 Clinical Controlled Trials (CCTs) and an additional 1 Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) (abstract) identified by hand searching in the 2010 ASCO Annual Meeting. The most appropriate way of summarizing time-to-event data is to use methods of survival analysis and express the intervention effect as a hazard ratio. In the included studies these outcome are mostly reported as dichotomous data so we should have asked authors research data for each participant and perform Individual Patient Data (IPD) meta-analysis. Given the study design and low quality of included studies we decided to give up and not to summarize these data.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventeen studies were not randomised and this increases the potential for selection bias. In addition, there was imbalance in the baseline characteristics of the participants included in all studies. All studies were classified as having a elevate risk of bias. The assessment of methodological quality of all non-randomized studies included in meta-analysis performed by the STROBE checklist has allowed us to identify several methodological limits in most of the analysed studies. At present, the information from the single RCT included (Ruers 2010) comes from an abstract of 2010 ASCO Annual Meeting where the allocation concealment was not reported; however in original protocol allocation concealment was adequately reported (EORTC 40004 protocol). The heterogeneity regarding interventions, comparisons and outcomes rendered the data not suitable.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review gathers information from several controlled clinical trials and observational studies which are vulnerable to different types of bias. The imbalance between characteristics of patients in the allocated groups appears to be the main concern. Only one randomised clinical trial (published as an abstract), comparing 60 patients receiving RFA plus CT versus 59 patients receiving CT alone, was identified. This study showed that PFS was significantly higher in the group that received RFA. However, it was not able to provide information on overall survival. In conclusion, evidence from the included studies are insufficient to recommend RFA for a radical oncological treatment of CRLMs.

Adjuvant radioimmunotherapy after radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases in an experimental model

PURPOSE

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has shown to improve survival in patients not eligible for surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases. However, recurrences after RFA are a major problem. Adjuvant radioimmunotherapy (RIT) after surgical resection of liver metastases has shown to improve survival. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that adjuvant RIT might be an effective way to prevent recurrent liver metastases after RFA in an experimental model.

METHODS

Tumours in the liver were induced by intrahepatic injection of 300,000 CC531 cells in male Wag/Rij rats (n = 60). Ten days later, the intrahepatic tumours were treated with RFA. Adjuvant RIT ((177)Lu-labelled monoclonal antibody MG1 at 300 MBq/kg) was administered intravenously either at the day of RFA (day 10) or 7 days later. Control rats received no treatment. Primary endpoint was survival.

RESULTS

Administration of (177)Lu-MG1 resulted in a transient decrease in body weight, compared to no adjuvant treatment. However, no other signs of clinical discomfort were registered. Log rank test showed that the survival curves of the groups treated with RIT, either at day 10 or day 17, did not differ significantly from the survival curve of the rats that did not receive adjuvant treatment (P = 0.902).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that adjuvant RIT does not increase survival after RFA of colorectal liver metastases in rats.

Clinical rescue evaluation in laparoscopic surgery for hepatic metastases by colorectal cancer

AIM

Laparoscopy is an increasingly important tool in the staging and treatment for potentially resectable liver metastases. The clinical risk score (CRS) is useful in selecting patients for diagnostic laparoscopy before planning resection of colorectal metastases. This study evaluates the effect of staging laparoscopy (SL) combined with CRS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2004 to December 2007, CRS evaluation and SL were performed in 65 consecutive patients with colorectal metastases, before planned open-exploration and resection. Patients were assigned to a CRS, which is based on 5 factors related to the primary tumor and the hepatic disease. This study was aimed at recognizing occult unresectable metastases, by combining laparoscopy and CRS.

RESULTS

Only 62 patients had a complete SL examination (3 were excluded for dense adhesions). A group of 24 patients was identified as unresectable, and 38 patients as resectable. In the latter group, 3 patients directly had laparoscopic treatment. In all, 38 patients underwent laparotomy (35 resectable, and 3 patients with dense adhesions that could not have a complete laparoscopic treatment).Resection was carried out in 30 of 38 (78.9%) cases, and the remaining 21% gave false-negative results. In all, there were 32 of 65 (49.2%) unresectable patients, and 75% of them were recognized by SL.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy identified the majority of patients with occult unresectable disease, improved resectability, and it should be a routine in patients being considered for potentially curative hepatic resection. The CRS, earlier shown to predict survival after hepatic resection, identifies high-risk patients, who are most likely to benefit from laparoscopy, and may improve resource utilization.

Microwave energy as a precoagulative device to assist in hepatic resection

INTRODUCTION

Microwave energy is another energy source than can be used to precoagulate hepatic tissue during hepatic resection. The aim of this study was to develop an optimal microwave precoagulation technique in a porcine model and then validate the technique during hepatic resection in patients.

METHODS

Institutional Animal Care and Use and Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved protocols were utilized for hepatic resection in a porcine model and validation in patients using microwave energy for precoagulation. Different numbers of antennas (one, two or three; spaced 5 mm apart) and ablation times (20, 30, 40, and 60 s) were evaluated to identify an optimal technique that effectively provided precoagulation.

RESULTS

Animal studies: Two antennas for 30 s provided the optimal ablation time, ablation width, mean size of largest vessel coagulated, and minimal bleeding when compared with other techniques. However, given that this is not an optimal technique for laparoscopic precoagulation, one antenna for 60 s was found to provide similar precoagulation success. Patient validation: To validate these techniques, three patients underwent open hepatectomy using two antennas with 5 mm spacing for 30 s, demonstrating successful precoagulation up to inflow/outflow vessels of 10 mm size or greater, which were controlled with a vascular stapler. In addition three patients underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy using one antenna for 60 s and demonstrated successful precoagulation up to inflow/outflow vessels of 8 mm or greater, which were controlled with a vascular stapler.

CONCLUSION

Microwave energy is a safe and effective precoagulation device to achieve good hemostasis during hepatic resection with both open and laparoscopic technique.

American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 clinical evidence review on radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To review the evidence about the efficacy and utility of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer (CRHM).

METHODS

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened a panel to conduct and analyze a comprehensive systematic review of the RFA literature from Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration Library.

RESULTS

Because data were considered insufficient to form the basis of a practice guideline, ASCO has instead published a clinical evidence review. The evidence is from single-arm, retrospective, and prospective trials. No randomized controlled trials have been included. The following three clinical issues were considered by the panel: the efficacy of surgical hepatic resection versus RFA for resectable tumors; the utility of RFA for unresectable tumors; and RFA approaches (open, laparoscopic, or percutaneous). Evidence suggests that hepatic resection improves overall survival (OS), particularly for patients with resectable tumors without extrahepatic disease. Careful patient and tumor selection is discussed at length in the literature. RFA investigators report a wide variability in the 5-year survival rate (14% to 55%) and local tumor recurrence rate (3.6% to 60%). The reported mortality rate was low (0% to 2%), and the major complications rate was commonly reported to be between 6% and 9%. RFA is currently performed with all three approaches.

CONCLUSION

There is a compelling need for more research to determine the efficacy and utility of RFA to increase local recurrence-free, progression-free, and disease-free survival as well as OS for patients with CRHM. Clinical trials have established that hepatic resection can improve OS for patients with resectable CRHM.

Simultaneous versus staged resection for synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases treated with either simultaneous or staged colectomy and hepatectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

From July 1997 to June 2008, a review of our 1,344-patient prospective hepato-pancreatico-biliary database identified 230 patients treated surgically for primary adenocarcinoma of the large bowel and synchronous hepatic metastasis. Clinicopathologic, operative, and perioperative data, complications, and grade of complications (grade 1, minor, to grade 5, death) were reviewed to evaluate selection criteria, operative methods, and perioperative outcomes. Chi-square and proportional hazard model were used to evaluate predictors of outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy patients underwent simultaneous resection of colon primary and liver metastasis in a single operation; 160 patients underwent staged operations. Simultaneous resections were similar for size (median 4 cm versus 3.7 cm) and number (median 3 cm versus 3 cm) of liver metastases. Major liver resections (>or=3 Couinaud segments) were similar between staged and simultaneous (32% versus 33%, respectively), as was type of colectomy (p=0.2). Complication rates and severity were similar in both groups: 39 of 70 patients (56%) in the simultaneous group experienced 63 complications versus 88 of 160 patients (55%) with 162 complications in the staged group (p=0.24). Multivariate analysis identified blood transfusion as a predictor of complication (odds ratio 2.98, p=0.001). Patients having simultaneous resection required fewer days in the hospital (median 10 days versus 18 days, p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

By avoiding a second laparotomy, simultaneous colon and hepatic resection reduces overall hospital stay, with no difference in morbidity and mortality rates or in severity of complications, compared with staged resection. Simultaneous resection is an acceptable option in patients with resectable synchronous colorectal metastasis.