1
|
Kusamura S, Baratti D, De Simone M, Pasqual EM, Ansaloni L, Marrelli D, Robella M, Accarpio F, Valle M, Scaringi S, Biacchi D, Palopoli C, Gazzanelli S, Guaglio M, Deraco M. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Pathway in Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030662. [PMID: 36765620 PMCID: PMC9913096 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a rare form of mesothelioma that carries a very poor prognosis. The 5-year overall survival is about 20% (±5.9). Survival is optimal for patients suitable for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC), with a median OS ranging from 34 to 92 months. However, selecting patients for surgery remains a complex task and requires a careful preoperative workup, rational analysis of prognostic profiles, and risk prediction models. Systemic chemotherapy could be offered: (1) in the adjuvant setting for high-risk patients; (2) for patients not eligible for CRS; and (3) for those with recurrent disease. It mainly includes the combination of Platin compound with Pemetrexed or immunotherapy. The biology of DMPM is still largely unknown. However, progress has been made on some fronts, such as telomere maintenance mechanisms, deregulation of apoptosis, tyrosine kinase pathways, and mutation of BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1). Future perspectives should include translational research to improve our understanding of the disease biology to identify druggable targets. We should also clear the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors and investigate new locoregional technologies, such as pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) or normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shigeki Kusamura
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit, Fondazione Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori IRCCS Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Baratti
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit, Fondazione Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori IRCCS Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Maria Pasqual
- AOUD Center Advanced Surgical Oncology, DAME University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Unit of General Surgery, San Matteo Hospital, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Daniele Marrelli
- Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Accarpio
- CRS and HIPEC Unit, Pietro Valdoni, Umberto I Policlinico di Roma, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Valle
- Peritoneal Tumours Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Daniele Biacchi
- CRS and HIPEC Unit, Pietro Valdoni, Umberto I Policlinico di Roma, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Carmen Palopoli
- U.O.C.—P.S.G. con O.B.I. Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria “G. Martino”, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - Sergio Gazzanelli
- CRS and HIPEC Unit, Pietro Valdoni, Umberto I Policlinico di Roma, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Guaglio
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit, Fondazione Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori IRCCS Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Marcello Deraco
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit, Fondazione Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori IRCCS Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dranichnikov P, Graf W, Cashin PH. Readmissions after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy-a national population-based study. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:67. [PMID: 32252768 PMCID: PMC7137266 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01837-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Comprehensive readmission morbidity studies after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are scarce. This study aimed to investigate readmissions and in-hospital morbidity after CRS and HIPEC. Methods The national in-hospital patient register was used to identify patients via the HIPEC ICD code JAQ10 2004–2014. Data were retrieved from the index CRS/HIPEC treatment and from all HIPEC-related readmissions within 6 months. Univariate/multivariate logistical analyses were performed to identify risk factors for reinterventions and readmissions. Results A total of 519 patients (mean age 56 years) had a mean hospital stay of 27 days. Within 6 months, 150 readmissions for adverse events were observed in 129 patients (25%) with 67 patients requiring an intervention (13%). Totally 179 patients (34%) required a reintervention during the first 6 months with 85 (16%) requiring a reoperation. Of these 179 patients, 83 patients (46%) did not undergo the intervention at the HIPEC centre. Gastric resection was the only independent risk factor for in-hospital intervention, and advanced age for readmission. Conclusion Morbidity causing HIPEC-related readmission was higher than expected with almost half of the interventions occurring outside the HIPEC centre. Gastric resection and high age are independent predictors of morbidity and readmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Dranichnikov
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Colorectal Surgery Section, Uppsala University Hospital, 1st Floor, Entrance 70, S-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Wilhelm Graf
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Colorectal Surgery Section, Uppsala University Hospital, 1st Floor, Entrance 70, S-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Peter H Cashin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Colorectal Surgery Section, Uppsala University Hospital, 1st Floor, Entrance 70, S-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kusamura S, Kepenekian V, Villeneuve L, Lurvink RJ, Govaerts K, De Hingh IHJT, Moran BJ, Van der Speeten K, Deraco M, Glehen O. Peritoneal mesothelioma: PSOGI/EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:36-59. [PMID: 32209311 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S Kusamura
- Department of Surgery, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale Dei Tumori di Milano, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, Milano, Milan, Cap 20133, Italy
| | - V Kepenekian
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - L Villeneuve
- Service de Recherche et Epidémiologie Cliniques, Pôle de Santé Publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - R J Lurvink
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - K Govaerts
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - I H J T De Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - B J Moran
- Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, North-Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - K Van der Speeten
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - M Deraco
- Department of Surgery, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale Dei Tumori di Milano, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, Milano, Milan, Cap 20133, Italy.
| | - O Glehen
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fields AC, Lu PW, Li GZ, Welten V, Jolissaint JS, Vierra BM, Saadat LV, Larson AC, Atkinson RB, Melnitchouk N. Current practices and future steps for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Curr Probl Surg 2020; 57:100727. [PMID: 32151327 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2019.100727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Adam C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Pamela W Lu
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - George Z Li
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Vanessa Welten
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joshua S Jolissaint
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Lily V Saadat
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Abby C Larson
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rachel B Atkinson
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nelya Melnitchouk
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an evolving strategy in the locoregional management of peritoneal surface malignancies, and the role of laparoscopy is expanding. Staging laparoscopy is routinely used to obtain tissue for diagnosis and assess extent of tumor burden. Laparoscopic CRS and HIPEC with curative intent is safe and effective in patients with a low disease burden. In patients with refractory malignant ascites, complete resolution of ascites and improvement in quality of life have been demonstrated with palliative laparoscopic HIPEC. Laparoscopic CRS and HIPEC has an expanding role in the treatment of peritoneal surface disease.
Collapse
|
6
|
Batista TP, Sarmento BJQ, Loureiro JF, Petruzziello A, Lopes A, Santos CC, Quadros CDA, Akaishi EH, Cordeiro EZ, Coimbra FJF, Laporte GA, Castro LS, Batista RMSS, Aguiar S, Costa WL, Ferreira FO. A proposal of Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO/SBCO) for standardizing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) procedures in Brazil: pseudomixoma peritonei, appendiceal tumors and malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 44:530-544. [PMID: 29019584 DOI: 10.1590/0100-69912017005016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery plus hypertermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy has emerged as a major comprehensive treatment of peritoneal malignancies and is currently the standard of care for appendiceal epithelial neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome as well as malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Unfortunately, there are some worldwide variations of the cytoreductive surgery and hypertermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy techniques since no single technique has so far demonstrated its superiority over the others. Therefore, standardization of practices might enhance better comparisons between outcomes. In these settings, the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology considered it important to present a proposal for standardizing cytoreductive surgery plus hypertermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy procedures in Brazil, with a special focus on producing homogeneous data for the developing Brazilian register for peritoneal surface malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thales Paulo Batista
- - Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira Institute, Department of Surgery / Oncology, Recife, PE, Brazil.,- University of Pernambuco, Department of Surgery, Recife, PE, Brazil
| | | | | | - Andrea Petruzziello
- - Marcelino Champagnat Hospital, Department of Surgical Oncology, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.,- AC Camargo Cancer Center, Department of Abdominal Surgery, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Ademar Lopes
- - AC Camargo Cancer Center, Department of Pelvic Surgery, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | - Eduardo Hiroshi Akaishi
- - Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, Department of Surgical Oncology, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | - Gustavo Andreazza Laporte
- - Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Department of Surgical Oncology, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Leonaldson Santos Castro
- - Complexo Hospitalar de Niterói, Service of Surgical Oncology, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.,- Nacional Cancer Institute, Service of Abdomino-Pelvic Surgery, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | | | - Samuel Aguiar
- - AC Camargo Cancer Center, Department of Pelvic Surgery, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Wilson Luiz Costa
- - AC Camargo Cancer Center, Department of Abdominal Surgery, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
McMullen JRW, Selleck M, Wall NR, Senthil M. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: limits of diagnosis and the case for liquid biopsy. Oncotarget 2018; 8:43481-43490. [PMID: 28415645 PMCID: PMC5522163 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2017] [Accepted: 03/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (PC) is a late stage manifestation of several gastrointestinal malignancies including appendiceal, colorectal, and gastric cancer. In PC, tumors metastasize to and deposit on the peritoneal surface and often leave patients with only palliative treatment options. For colorectal PC, median survival is approximately five months, and palliative systemic therapy is able to extend this to approximately 12 months. However, cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) with a curative intent is possible in some patients with limited tumor burden. In well-selected patients undergoing complete cytoreduction, median survival has been reported as high as 63 month. Identifying patients earlier who are either at risk for, or who have recently developed PC may provide them with additional treatment options such as CRS/HIPEC. PC is diagnosed late by imaging findings or often times during an invasive procedures such as laparoscopy or laparotomy. In order to improve the outcomes of PC patients, a minimally invasive, accurate, and specific PC screening method needs to be developed. By utilizing circulating PC biomarkers in the serum of patients, a “liquid biopsy,” may be able to be generated to allow a tailored treatment plan and early intervention. Exosomes, stable patient-derived nanovesicles present in blood, urine, and many other bodily fluids, show promise as a tool for the evaluation of labile biomarkers. If liquid biopsies can be perfected in PC, manifestations of this cancer may be more effectively treated, thus offering improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R W McMullen
- Department of Basic Sciences, Center for Health Disparities & Molecular Medicine, Division of Biochemistry, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Selleck
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Nathan R Wall
- Department of Basic Sciences, Center for Health Disparities & Molecular Medicine, Division of Biochemistry, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Maheswari Senthil
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morales Soriano R, Morón Canis JM, Molina Romero X, Pérez Celada J, Tejada Gavela S, Segura Sampedro JJ, Jiménez Morillas P, Díaz Jover P, García Pérez JM, Sena Ruiz F, González Argente X. Influence of simultaneous liver and peritoneal resection on postoperative morbi-mortality and survival in patients with colon cancer treated with surgical cytoreduction and intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. Cir Esp 2017; 95:214-221. [PMID: 28400138 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2017.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2016] [Revised: 03/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (HIPEC) has recently been established as the treatment of choice for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colonic origin. Until recently, the simultaneous presence of peritoneal and hepatic dissemination has been considered a contraindication for surgery. The aim of this paper is to analyze the morbidity, mortality and survival of patients with simultaneous peritoneal and hepatic resection with HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to colon cancer. METHODS Between January 2010 and January 2015, 61 patients were operated on, 16 had simultaneous peritoneal and hepatic dissemination (group RH+), and 45 presented only peritoneal dissemination (group RH-). RESULTS There were no differences between the groups in terms of demographic data, length of surgery and extension of peritoneal disease. Postoperative grade III-V complications were significantly higher in the RH+ group (56.3 vs. 26.6%; P=.032). For the whole group, mortality rate was 3.2% (two patients in group RH-, and none in group RH+). Patients with liver resection had a longer postoperative stay (14.4 vs. 23.1 days) (P=.027). Median overall survival was 33 months for RH-, and 36 for RH+ group. Median disease-free survival was 16 months for RH-, and 24 months for RH+ group. CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous peritoneal cytoreduction and hepatic resection resulted in a significantly higher Clavien grade III-V morbidity and a longer hospital stay, although the results are similar to other major abdominal interventions. The application of multimodal oncological and surgical treatment may obtain similar long-term survival results in both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Morales Soriano
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España.
| | - José Miguel Morón Canis
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Xavier Molina Romero
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Judit Pérez Celada
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Silvia Tejada Gavela
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Juan José Segura Sampedro
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Patricia Jiménez Morillas
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Paula Díaz Jover
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - José María García Pérez
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Fátima Sena Ruiz
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Xavier González Argente
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Klaver CEL, Groenen H, Morton DG, Laurberg S, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ. Recommendations and consensus on the treatment of peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin: a systematic review of national and international guidelines. Colorectal Dis 2017; 19:224-236. [PMID: 28008728 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of (inter)national guidelines on the treatment of peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer origin (PMCRC) and to determine the degree of consensus and available evidence with identification of topics for future research. METHOD A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed as well as Tripdatabase, National Guideline Clearinghouse, BMJ Best Practice and Guidelines International Network was performed to identify (inter)national guidelines and consensus statements from oncological or surgical societies on PMCRC. The quality of guidelines was assessed using the AGREE-II score. Topics followed by recommendations were extracted from the guidelines. The recommendations, highest level of supporting evidence and the degree of consensus were determined for each topic. RESULTS Twenty-one guidelines were included, in most (15) of which cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) was recommended in selected patients based on level 1b evidence. Substantial consensus was also reached on the benefit of multidisciplinary team discussion and the achievability of a (near) complete cytoreduction (CC0-1) without supporting evidence. Both evidence and consensus were lacking regarding other aspects including preoperative positron emission tomography/CT, second look surgery in high risk patients, the optimal patient selection for CRS/HIPEC, procedural aspects of HIPEC and (perioperative) systemic therapy. CONCLUSION In currently available guidelines, evidence and consensus on the treatment strategy for PMCRC are lacking. Updates of guidelines are ongoing and future (randomized) clinical trials should contribute to multidisciplinary and international consensus on treatment strategies for PMCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C E L Klaver
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Groenen
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D G Morton
- Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Laurberg
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - W A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Colby AH, Oberlies NH, Pearce CJ, Herrera VLM, Colson YL, Grinstaff MW. Nanoparticle drug-delivery systems for peritoneal cancers: a case study of the design, characterization and development of the expansile nanoparticle. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-NANOMEDICINE AND NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY 2017; 9. [PMID: 28185434 DOI: 10.1002/wnan.1451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2016] [Revised: 11/30/2016] [Accepted: 12/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Nanoparticle (NP)-based drug-delivery systems are frequently employed to improve the intravenous administration of chemotherapy; however, few reports explore their application as an intraperitoneal therapy. We developed a pH-responsive expansile nanoparticle (eNP) specifically designed to leverage the intraperitoneal route of administration to treat intraperitoneal malignancies, such as mesothelioma, ovarian, and pancreatic carcinomatoses. This review describes the design, evaluation, and evolution of the eNP technology and, specifically, a Materials-Based Targeting paradigm that is unique among the many active- and passive-targeting strategies currently employed by NP-delivery systems. pH-responsive eNP swelling is responsible for the extended residence at the target tumor site as well as the subsequent improvement in tumoral drug delivery and efficacy observed with paclitaxel-loaded eNPs (PTX-eNPs) compared to the standard clinical formulation of paclitaxel, Taxol®. Superior PTX-eNP efficacy is demonstrated in two different orthotopic models of peritoneal cancer-mesothelioma and ovarian cancer; in a third model-of pancreatic cancer-PTX-eNPs demonstrated comparable efficacy to Taxol with reduced toxicity. Furthermore, the unique structural and responsive characteristics of eNPs enable them to be used in three additional treatment paradigms, including: treatment of lymphatic metastases in breast cancer; use as a highly fluorescent probe to visually guide the resection of peritoneal implants; and, in a two-step delivery paradigm for concentrating separately administered NP and drug at a target site. This case study serves as an important example of using the targeted disease-state's pathophysiology to inform the NP design as well as the method of use of the delivery system. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2017, 9:e1451. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1451 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron H Colby
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicholas H Oberlies
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA
| | | | - Victoria L M Herrera
- Department of Medicine and Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yolonda L Colson
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark W Grinstaff
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Chemistry, and Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gelli M, Huguenin JF, Cerebelli C, Benhaim L, Honoré C, Elias D, Goéré D. Strategies to prevent peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from colorectal cancer. Future Oncol 2017; 13:907-918. [PMID: 28052691 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2016-0389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last decades, cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy became a curative option for peritoneal metastases in selected patients, otherwise considered for palliative therapy alone. Better knowledge of physiopathology of peritoneal spread and identification of predictive factors for peritoneal relapse prompted specialized centers to investigate the role of a 'proactive approach' in order to early detect peritoneal metastasis. These encouraging data could justify an active attitude in selected patients at high risk of peritoneal recurrence after curative resection of primary tumor. Selection criteria and the timing of complementary hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy remain important points of discussion. In this article, we will discuss treatment principles and future perspectives to early treat and, if possible, to prevent peritoneal dissemination after curative treatment of colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximiliano Gelli
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Janina Fl Huguenin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Cecilia Cerebelli
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Léonor Benhaim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Charles Honoré
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Dominique Elias
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Diane Goéré
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Krishnamurthy S, Balasubramaniam R. Role of Imaging in Peritoneal Surface Malignancies. Indian J Surg Oncol 2016; 7:441-452. [PMID: 27872533 PMCID: PMC5097766 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-016-0539-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 06/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Imaging plays a vital role in the evaluation of peritoneal malignancies. The presence of peritoneal metastases (PM) alters tumor staging, with direct implications in treatment choice and prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as a combined modality treatment have led to prolonged survival and even cure in selected patients with PM. Better outcomes are seen in patients with limited disease spread. Therefore, early diagnosis of peritoneal tumor seeding is essential. Despite significant advancement of technology, assessment of the origin of PM is often difficult, due partly to the complex peritoneal anatomy and partly due to the complex overlap of imaging features. Multidetector CT (MDCT) is the main stay due to its wide availbility, rapid evaluation, robust technique and good resolution. Imaging plays a vital role in selecting patients for the combined modality treatment. MRI is not as popular as CT due to limited availability, time required for the study and lack of experience with interpreting the results. PET-CT is useful in ruling out extra peritoneal disease and it is the CT component that is more reliable for predicting the disease extent. This article reviews the current use of various imaging modalities in various stages of treatment of patients with PM especially those undergoing CRS and HIPEC.
Collapse
|
13
|
Sluiter N, de Cuba E, Kwakman R, Kazemier G, Meijer G, Te Velde EA. Adhesion molecules in peritoneal dissemination: function, prognostic relevance and therapeutic options. Clin Exp Metastasis 2016; 33:401-16. [PMID: 27074785 PMCID: PMC4884568 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-016-9791-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2015] [Accepted: 04/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Peritoneal dissemination is diagnosed in 10–25 % of colorectal cancer patients. Selected patients are treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. For these patients, earlier diagnosis, optimised selection criteria and a personalised approach are warranted. Biomarkers could play a crucial role here. However, little is known about possible candidates. Considering tumour cell adhesion as a key step in peritoneal dissemination, we aim to provide an overview of the functional importance of adhesion molecules in peritoneal dissemination and discuss the prognostic, diagnostic and therapeutic options of these candidate biomarkers. A systematic literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. In 132 in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo studies published between 1995 and 2013, we identified twelve possibly relevant adhesion molecules in various cancers that disseminate peritoneally. The most studied molecules in tumour cell adhesion are integrin α2β1, CD44 s and MUC16. Furthermore, L1CAM, EpCAM, MUC1, sLex and Lex, chemokine receptors, Betaig-H3 and uPAR might be of clinical importance. ICAM1 was found to be less relevant in tumour cell adhesion in the context of peritoneal metastases. Based on currently available data, sLea and MUC16 are the most promising prognostic biomarkers for colorectal peritoneal metastases that may help improve patient selection. Different adhesion molecules appear expressed in haematogenous and transcoelomic spread, indicating two different attachment processes. However, our extensive assessment of available literature reveals that knowledge on metastasis-specific genes and their possible candidates is far from complete.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Sluiter
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erienne de Cuba
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Riom Kwakman
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit Meijer
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NKI-AVL), Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth Atie Te Velde
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgical Oncology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sluiter NR, de Cuba EMV, Kwakman R, Meijerink WJHJ, Delis-van Diemen PM, Coupé VMH, Beliën JAM, Meijer GA, de Hingh IHJT, te Velde EA. Versican and vascular endothelial growth factor expression levels in peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer are associated with survival after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Clin Exp Metastasis 2016; 33:297-307. [PMID: 26873137 PMCID: PMC4799792 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-016-9779-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2015] [Accepted: 02/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can increase survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with peritoneal metastases (PM). This treatment is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Therefore, improvement of patient selection is necessary. Assuming that the clinical phenotype is dictated by biological mechanisms, biomarkers could play a crucial role in this process. Since it is unknown whether and to what extent angiogenesis influences the course of disease in patients with PM, we investigated the expression of two angiogenesis-related markers and their relation to overall survival (OS) in CRC patients after CRS and HIPEC. Clinicopathological data and tissue samples were collected from 65 CRC patients with isolated metastases to the peritoneum that underwent CRS and HIPEC. Whole tissue specimens from PM were evaluated for versican (VCAN) expression, VEGF expression and microvessel density (MVD) by immunohistochemistry. The relation between these markers and OS was assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis. Associations between VEGF expression, VCAN expression, MVD and clinicopathological data were tested. High stromal VCAN expression was associated with high MVD (p = 0.001), better resection outcome (p = 0.003) and high T-stage (p = 0.027). High epithelial VCAN expression was associated with MVD (p = 0.007) and a more complete resection (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, simplified peritoneal cancer index (p = 0.001), VEGF expression levels (p = 0.012), age (p = 0.030), epithelial VCAN expression levels (p = 0.042) and lymph node status (p = 0.053) were associated with OS. Concluding, VCAN and VEGF were associated with survival in CRC patients with PM after CRS and HIPEC. Independent validation in a well-defined patient cohort is required to confirm the putative prognostic role of these candidate biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N R Sluiter
- Section of Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E M V de Cuba
- Section of Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Kwakman
- Section of Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W J H J Meijerink
- Section of Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P M Delis-van Diemen
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V M H Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J A M Beliën
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, NKI-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, NKI-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - E A te Velde
- Section of Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mehta SS, Bhatt A, Glehen O. Cytoreductive Surgery and Peritonectomy Procedures. Indian J Surg Oncol 2016; 7:139-51. [PMID: 27065704 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-016-0505-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become widely accepted as an effective method of treating peritoneal metastases (PM) from various cancers. CRS performed with the goal of removing all the macroscopic disease and comprises of peritonectomy procedures and visceral resections. CRS is a technically challenging surgery that requires a considerable amount of skill and appropriate patient selection. This article is a review of the techniques and current recommendations for performing CRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanket S Mehta
- Division of Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Saifee Hospital, MK marg, Charni road, Girgaon, Mumbai, 400004 India
| | - Aditi Bhatt
- Fortis Hospitals Limited, 154/9, Bannerghatta Road, Opp. IIM-B, Bangalore, 560076 India
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Pierre Bénite, France ; Université Lyon 1, EMR 3738, 69600 Oullins, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Razenberg LGEM, van Gestel YRBM, Lemmens VEPP, de Hingh IHJT, Creemers GJ. Bevacizumab in Addition to Palliative Chemotherapy for Patients With Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Colorectal Origin: A Nationwide Population-Based Study. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2015; 15:e41-6. [PMID: 26762572 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2015.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2015] [Revised: 11/27/2015] [Accepted: 12/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) rely on palliative systemic treatment options. However, data on the use and effect of systemic treatment strategies, including targeted agents for the palliative treatment of colorectal PC, are lacking. We conducted a nationwide population-based study with data from the period in which the targeted agent bevacizumab was introduced in the Netherlands. PATIENTS AND METHODS The present study included all patients diagnosed from 2007 to 2014 with synchronous PC from CRC treated with only palliative systemic therapy. We assessed the use of bevacizumab, the standard choice of targeted treatment, in addition to first-line chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the predictors for the additional prescription of bevacizumab. Survival estimates were calculated, and multivariable Cox analyses were performed to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) of death stratified by the treatment received. RESULTS A total of 1235 patients received palliative chemotherapy, of whom 436 also received bevacizumab (35%). Patients aged ≥ 75 years and patients with PC from colonic tumors were less likely to receive chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. The addition of bevacizumab to palliative chemotherapy was associated with an improved overall median survival of 7.5 versus 11 months in both patients with isolated PC and those with concomitant extraperitoneal metastases. The improvement remained after adjustment for patient and tumor characteristics (HR, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.83). CONCLUSION The results of the present nationwide population-based study support the rationale for bevacizumab in addition to palliative chemotherapy for patients with PC of CRC and underline the need for ongoing efforts to precisely determine the role of targeted therapy in the treatment of PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke G E M Razenberg
- Department of Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Department of Registry and Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
| | - Yvette R B M van Gestel
- Department of Registry and Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Valery E P P Lemmens
- Department of Registry and Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
März L, Piso P. Treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2015; 3:298-302. [PMID: 26424828 PMCID: PMC4650975 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/gov044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2015] [Accepted: 08/07/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal seedings of a colorectal tumor represent the second most frequent site of metastasis (after the liver). In the era of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-only chemotherapy, the prognosis was poor for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases. Within the last few years, new chemotherapeutic and targeted agents have improved the prognosis; however, the response to these treatments seems to be lower than that for liver metastases. The combination of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy have further improved both disease-free survival and overall survival. Keeping this in mind, every patient presenting with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer should be evaluated and receive adequate treatment, if possible in the above-mentioned combination. This paper reviews recent advancements in the therapy of peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loreen März
- Department of Surgery, St. John of God Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Pompiliu Piso
- Department of Surgery, St. John of God Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Klaver CEL, Musters GD, Bemelman WA, Punt CJA, Verwaal VJ, Dijkgraaf MGW, Aalbers AGJ, van der Bilt JDW, Boerma D, Bremers AJA, Burger JWA, Buskens CJ, Evers P, van Ginkel RJ, van Grevenstein WMU, Hemmer PHJ, de Hingh IHJT, Lammers LA, van Leeuwen BL, Meijerink WJHJ, Nienhuijs SW, Pon J, Radema SA, van Ramshorst B, Snaebjornsson P, Tuynman JB, Te Velde EA, Wiezer MJ, de Wilt JHW, Tanis PJ. Adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with colon cancer at high risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis; the COLOPEC randomized multicentre trial. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:428. [PMID: 26003804 PMCID: PMC4492087 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1430-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2015] [Accepted: 05/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The peritoneum is the second most common site of recurrence in colorectal cancer. Early detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) by imaging is difficult. Patients eventually presenting with clinically apparent PC have a poor prognosis. Median survival is only about five months if untreated and the benefit of palliative systemic chemotherapy is limited. Only a quarter of patients are eligible for curative treatment, consisting of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CR/HIPEC). However, the effectiveness depends highly on the extent of disease and the treatment is associated with a considerable complication rate. These clinical problems underline the need for effective adjuvant therapy in high-risk patients to minimize the risk of outgrowth of peritoneal micro metastases. Adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) seems to be suitable for this purpose. Without the need for cytoreductive surgery, adjuvant HIPEC can be performed with a low complication rate and short hospital stay. Methods/Design The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of adjuvant HIPEC in preventing the development of PC in patients with colon cancer at high risk of peritoneal recurrence. This study will be performed in the nine Dutch HIPEC centres, starting in April 2015. Eligible for inclusion are patients who underwent curative resection for T4 or intra-abdominally perforated cM0 stage colon cancer. After resection of the primary tumour, 176 patients will be randomized to adjuvant HIPEC followed by routine adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in the experimental arm, or to systemic chemotherapy only in the control arm. Adjuvant HIPEC will be performed simultaneously or shortly after the primary resection. Oxaliplatin will be used as chemotherapeutic agent, for 30 min at 42-43 °C. Just before HIPEC, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin will be administered intravenously. Primary endpoint is peritoneal disease-free survival at 18 months. Diagnostic laparoscopy will be performed routinely after 18 months postoperatively in both arms of the study in patients without evidence of disease based on routine follow-up using CT imaging and CEA. Discussion Adjuvant HIPEC is assumed to reduce the expected 25 % absolute risk of PC in patients with T4 or perforated colon cancer to a risk of 10 %. This reduction is likely to translate into a prolonged overall survival. Trial registration number NCT02231086 (Clinicaltrials.gov)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte E L Klaver
- Department of surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Post box 22660, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Gijsbert D Musters
- Department of surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Post box 22660, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Willem A Bemelman
- Department of surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Post box 22660, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of oncology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Post box 22660, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Victor J Verwaal
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital/the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Post box 22660, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Arend G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital/the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jarmila D W van der Bilt
- Department of surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Post box 22660, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Post box 2500, 3430 EM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - Andre J A Bremers
- Department of surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 22, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Jacobus W A Burger
- Department of surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre/Daniel den Hoed, Post box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Christianne J Buskens
- Department of surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Post box 22660, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Pauline Evers
- Dutch Cancer Patient Organization 'Leven met Kanker', Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Robert J van Ginkel
- Department of surgery, University Medical Centre, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Patrick H J Hemmer
- Department of surgery, University Medical Centre, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Post box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Laureen A Lammers
- Department of pharmacy, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Post box 22660, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Barbara L van Leeuwen
- Department of surgery, University Medical Centre, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Wilhelmus J H J Meijerink
- Departement of surgery, Vrije University Medical Center, Post box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Post box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Jolien Pon
- Society of patients with cancer of the gastrointestinal tract (SPKS), Darmkanker Nederland, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Sandra A Radema
- Department of oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 22, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Bert van Ramshorst
- Department of surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Post box 2500, 3430 EM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of pathology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital/the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Departement of surgery, Vrije University Medical Center, Post box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Elisabeth A Te Velde
- Departement of surgery, Vrije University Medical Center, Post box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marinus J Wiezer
- Department of surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Post box 2500, 3430 EM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 22, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Post box 22660, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Akgül &O, Çetinkaya E, Ersöz Ş, Tez M. Role of surgery in colorectal cancer liver metastases. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:6113-6122. [PMID: 24876733 PMCID: PMC4033450 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 168] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2013] [Revised: 12/26/2013] [Accepted: 02/17/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the third most common cancer, and approximately 35%-55% of patients with CRC will develop hepatic metastases during the course of their disease. Surgical resection represents the only chance of long-term survival. The goal of surgery should be to resect all metastases with negative histological margins while preserving sufficient functional hepatic parenchyma. Although resection remains the only chance of long-term survival, management strategies should be tailored for each case. For patients with extensive metastatic disease who would otherwise be unresectable, the combination of advances in medical therapy, such as systemic chemotherapy (CTX), and the improvement in surgical techniques for metastatic disease, have enhanced prognosis with prolongation of the median survival rate and cure. The use of portal vein embolization and preoperative CTX may also increase the number of patients suitable for surgical treatment. Despite current treatment options, many patients still experience a recurrence after hepatic resection. More active systemic CTX agents are being used increasingly as adjuvant therapy either before or after surgery. Local tumor ablative therapies, such as microwave coagulation therapy and radiofrequency ablation therapy, should be considered as an adjunct to hepatic resection, in which resection cannot deal with all of the tumor lesions. Formulation of an individualized plan, which combines surgery with systemic CTX, is a necessary task of the multidisciplinary team. The aim of this paper is to discuss different approaches for patients that are treated due to CRC liver metastasis.
Collapse
|
20
|
Bakrin N, Gilly FN, Baratti D, Bereder JM, Quenet F, Lorimier G, Mohamed F, Elias D, Glehen O. Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma treated by cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. A multi-institutional study of 36 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39:742-7. [PMID: 23510853 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2012] [Revised: 02/12/2013] [Accepted: 02/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) is a rare condition, histologically identical to ovarian serous carcinoma and often diagnosed at late stage. There is not any standardized treatment for PPSC. A retrospective multicentric study was performed in French speaking centers to evaluate cytoreduction surgery and Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from different origins. The manuscript's aim was to study the particular population with PPSC. METHODS Between September 1997 and July 2007, 36 patients with PPSC from 9 institutions underwent 39 procedures. RESULTS Mortality and morbidity rates were 5.6% and 20.6% respectively. The overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years are respectively 93.6, 71.5 and 57.4%. The median overall survival was not reached. By univariate analysis, the only factor that had prognostic value was PCI (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS The therapeutic approach combining cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC may achieve long-term survival in patients with PPSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Bakrin
- Surgical Oncology Department, Lyon Civil Hospices, South Lyon University Hospital Center, 165 chemin du grand Revoyet, 69365 Pierre Bénite, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
de Cuba EMV, Kwakman R, Knol DL, Bonjer HJ, Meijer GA, Te Velde EA. Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for peritoneal metastases combined with curative treatment of colorectal liver metastases: Systematic review of all literature and meta-analysis of observational studies. Cancer Treat Rev 2012; 39:321-7. [PMID: 23244778 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2012] [Revised: 11/05/2012] [Accepted: 11/06/2012] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assess the overall outcome in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients that present with a combination of peritoneal metastases (PM) and liver metastases (CRLM) after curative resection and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the current literature. METHODS A systematic literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines was conducted using the PubMed database of the U.S. National library of Medicine using the keywords: colorectal cancer, liver metastasis, extra-hepatic, peritoneal metastases, peritoneal carcinomatosis, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), HIPEC and combinations hereof. Papers focussing on CRS and HIPEC for PM combined with curative treatment of CRLM were included, provided sufficient information on survival outcomes could be extracted. Duplicate publications were excluded. Meta-analysis was performed using the method described by Tierney et al. RESULTS After screening and full-text assessment of 39 papers, six articles were included containing data on combined PM and CRLM in patients treated with curative resection of both sites and HIPEC or early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC). Three articles provided enough statistical information for meta-analysis. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) was extracted from survival curves and was 1.24 (CI 0.96-1.60). A comparison was made with patients presenting with isolated PM undergoing CRS and HIPEC and with patients with disseminated disease undergoing (modern) systemic chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of randomized controlled studies, we found in this systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with a combination of colorectal metastases in the liver as well as in the peritoneum show a trend towards a lower overall survival after curative resection and HIPEC, when compared to patients with isolated peritoneal metastases after CRS and HIPEC (pooled HR1.24, CI 0.96-1.60). However, patients with metastatic CRC show a tendency towards increased median overall survival after CRS and HIPEC combined with resection of liver metastases when compared to treatment with modern systemic chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M V de Cuba
- Dept. of Surgical Oncology, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sommariva A, Zagonel V, Rossi CR. The role of laparoscopy in peritoneal surface malignancies selected for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19:3737-44. [PMID: 22805859 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2465-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was developed as locoregional treatment for primary or secondary peritoneal tumors. The role of laparoscopy over several stages of diagnosis and the treatment of the patients affected by peritoneal carcinomatosis and selected for CS + HIPEC shows some peculiarities, and their potential application in this field is not fully known. Our aim was to review and summarize the applications, the results, and the future directions of laparoscopy in the management of the patients affected by carcinomatosis and scheduled for CS + HIPEC. METHODS Appropriate keywords were adopted to identify the relevant studies on this topic in PubMed/Medline electronic databases. RESULTS The role of laparoscopy in diagnosis and staging of patients selected for CS + HIPEC seems to have a great but probably underestimated potential. Laparoscopic CS + HIPEC is technically feasible with an acceptable morbidity profile, especially in patients with low tumor load. In selected patients with malignant ascites, laparoscopic HIPEC achieves a good palliative effect, with a low morbidity profile. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopy plays a partially explored role in diagnosis and staging of patients selected for CS + HIPEC. The use of laparoscopic HIPEC with an adjuvant, curative, or palliative intent seems feasible, but further studies are required in order to explore and validate all potential indications. For all these reasons, it would be advisable to provide every HIPEC center with specific laparoscopic skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Sommariva
- Melanoma and Sarcoma Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Perioperative fast track program in intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011; 37:543-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.03.134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2010] [Revised: 01/13/2011] [Accepted: 03/17/2011] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
|
24
|
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and without adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIC ovarian cancer. Bull Cancer 2010; 97:E23-32. [PMID: 20202920 DOI: 10.1684/bdc.2010.1063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility and efficacy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) without adjuvant chemotherapy for relapsed or persistent advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS This observational study included stage IIIC ovarian cancer patients due to undergo CRS (interval debulking or recurrent surgery) followed by HIPEC with oxaliplatin (460 mg/m2) for 30 min. RESULTS Twenty-two patients (12 interval debulking procedures and 10 recurrence procedures) were enrolled between September 2003 and September 2007. HIPEC was not performed in four patients because of operative findings. No patient received adjuvant chemotherapy after HIPEC. Patients were followed up routinely until recurrence or death. Median peritoneal cancer index at surgery was 6 (range: 1-18). Before HIPEC, all patients had completeness of cytoreduction scores of 0 or 1. Median length of hospital stay was 21 days (range 13-65). Ten patients (55.6%) had CTCAE grade 3-4 toxicity, including three patients (16.7%) requiring reoperation. No postoperative mortality was observed. With a median follow-up of 38 months (CI 95% 23.8-39.2), median overall survival was not reached. The 3-year overall survival rate was 83% (CI 95% 54-95). Median disease-free survival was, respectively, 16.9 months (CI 95% 10.2-23.2) and 10 months (CI 95% 4.5-11.3) for patients undergoing interval debulking or recurrence surgery. CONCLUSION HIPEC without adjuvant chemotherapy is both feasible and safe, but with a high rate of grade 3-5 toxicity. Survival results are encouraging but should be confirmed in a randomized trial.
Collapse
|
25
|
Cotte E, Passot G, Gilly FN, Glehen O. Selection of patients and staging of peritoneal surface malignancies. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2010; 2:31-5. [PMID: 21160814 PMCID: PMC2999158 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v2.i1.31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2009] [Revised: 08/01/2009] [Accepted: 08/08/2009] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a common evolution of cancer of the gastrointestinal tract, and has been traditionally regarded as a terminal disease with short median survival. During the last 20 years, thanks to its favourable oncologic results, a new loco-regional therapeutic approach, combining cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), has an important development. Due to its significant, but acceptable, morbidity and mortality, and high cost, this comprehensive management plan requires knowledgeable patient selection. Quantitative prognostic indicators are required to assess a patient’s eligibility. Large multicenter studies have identified several prognostic factors, which can be used for a better selection of patients who would benefit from the combination of cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC. Indications for treatment of PC with cytoreduction and HIPEC are now validated for several diseases: peritoneal mesothelioma, pseudomyxoma peritonei, PC from the appendix, and colorectal cancer. Indications are still under discussion for gastric and ovarian carcinomatosis. Computed tomography is the best radiological for staging the disease. The extent of peritoneal carcinomatosis is, however, difficult to evaluate preoperatively, and precise evaluation is most often performed during surgical exploration. Cytoreductive surgery associated with HIPEC for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis should be performed for young patients with limited and resectable carcinomatosis, in specialized institutions involved in the management of peritoneal surface malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eddy Cotte
- Eddy Cotte, Guillaume Passot, François-Noël Gilly, Olivier Glehen, Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon-Sud Hospital, F-69495 Pierre Bénite Cédex, France; Équipe Accueil 3738, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon-Sud Faculty, BP12, F-69921 Oullins Cédex, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
González-Moreno S, Ortega-Pérez G, González-Bayón L. Indications and patient selection for cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Surg Oncol 2009; 100:287-92. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.21325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
27
|
Chua TC, Yan TD, Zhao J, Morris DL. Peritoneal carcinomatosis and liver metastases from colorectal cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy and liver resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35:1299-305. [PMID: 19632081 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2009] [Revised: 06/29/2009] [Accepted: 07/02/2009] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An aggressive therapy comprising of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) and liver resection/ablation is generally not offered to patients with both colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) and liver metastases (LM) as it no longer represents a loco-regional disease. We review the outcomes of patients who underwent an aggressive treatment with a curative intent for both CRPC and LM as a prelude towards determining the suitability of this treatment. METHODS Patients with CRPC were treated with cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in our institution. Patients with LM underwent additional treatment of liver resection/ablation. The characteristics and survival of patients with isolated CRPC and those with both CRPC and LM were compared. RESULTS Fifty-five patients underwent complete cytoreductive surgery for treatment of CRPC, amongst which 16 patients had LM. The overall median survival was 36 months. Fourteen of the 16 patients treated for CRPC and LM underwent synchronous treatment. When patients with CRPC alone or CRPC with LM were compared, patients with CRPC and LM had a lower PCI (p=0.03), received less HIPEC infusion (p<0.001), received less of both HIPEC and EPIC infusion (p=0.007), had a shorter procedural duration (p=0.001) and required less blood transfusion (p=0.02). There was no difference in survival between patients who had CRPC alone or CRPC with LM who underwent aggressive treatment (p=0.77). CONCLUSIONS A curative procedure may be offered to selected patients with CRPC and LM, especially in those with a low peritoneal cancer index.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T C Chua
- Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
|
29
|
|