1
|
Bonnot PE, Lintis A, Mercier F, Benzerdjeb N, Passot G, Pocard M, Meunier B, Bereder JM, Abboud K, Marchal F, Quenet F, Goere D, Msika S, Arvieux C, Pirro N, Wernert R, Rat P, Gagnière J, Lefevre JH, Courvoisier T, Kianmanesh R, Vaudoyer D, Rivoire M, Meeus P, Villeneuve L, Piessen G, Glehen O. Prognosis of poorly cohesive gastric cancer after complete cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CYTO-CHIP study). Br J Surg 2021; 108:1225-1235. [PMID: 34498666 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of gastric poorly cohesive carcinoma (PCC) is increasing. The prognosis for patients with peritoneal metastases remains poor and the role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is controversial. The aim was to clarify the impact of gastric PCC with peritoneal metastases treated by CRS with or without HIPEC. METHODS All patients with peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer treated with CRS with or without HIPEC, in 19 French centres, between 1989 and 2014, were identified from institutional databases. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes were compared between PCC and non-PCC subtypes, and the possible benefit of HIPEC was assessed. RESULTS In total, 277 patients were included (188 PCC, 89 non-PCC). HIPEC was performed in 180 of 277 patients (65 per cent), including 124 of 188 with PCC (66 per cent). Median overall survival (OS) was 14.7 (95 per cent c.i. 12.7 to 17.3) months in the PCC group versus 21.2 (14.7 to 36.4) months in the non-PCC group (P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, PCC (hazard ratio (HR) 1.51, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 2.25; P = 0.044) was associated with poorer OS, as were pN3, Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), and resection with a completeness of cytoreduction score of 1, whereas HIPEC was associated with improved OS (HR 0.52; P < 0.001). The benefit of CRS-HIPEC over CRS alone was consistent, irrespective of histology, with a median OS of 16.7 versus 11.3 months (HR 0.60, 0.39 to 0.92; P = 0.018) in the PCC group, and 34.5 versus 14.3 months (HR 0.43, 0.25 to 0.75; P = 0.003) in the non-PCC group. Non-PCC and HIPEC were independently associated with improved recurrence-free survival and fewer peritoneal recurrences. In patients who underwent HIPEC, PCI values of below 7 and less than 13 were predictive of OS in PCC and non-PCC populations respectively. CONCLUSION In selected patients, CRS-HIPEC offers acceptable outcomes among those with gastric PCC and long survival for patients without PCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P E Bonnot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France.,Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - A Lintis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Department of General Surgery, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - F Mercier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - N Benzerdjeb
- Pathology Department, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - G Passot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - M Pocard
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - B Meunier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes, France
| | - J M Bereder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU L'Archet, Nice, France
| | - K Abboud
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU St Etienne, St Etienne, France
| | - F Marchal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - F Quenet
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Val D'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - D Goere
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - S Msika
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Louis Mourier, Paris, France
| | - C Arvieux
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU La Tronche, Grenoble, France
| | - N Pirro
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU La Timone, Marseille, France
| | - R Wernert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - P Rat
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Le Bocage, Dijon, France
| | - J Gagnière
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - J H Lefevre
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - T Courvoisier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - R Kianmanesh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Reims, Reims, France
| | - D Vaudoyer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - M Rivoire
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - P Meeus
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - L Villeneuve
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Unité de Recherche Clinique, Pôle Information Médicale Evaluation Recherche, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - G Piessen
- Department of General Surgery, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - O Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ceribelli C, Debs T, Chevallier A, Piche MA, Bereder JM. Initial experience of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in a French hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) expert center. Surg Endosc 2020; 34:2803-2806. [PMID: 32166545 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07488-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new intraabdominal technique to approach non-resectable peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). PIPAC can be performed alone or alternated with systemic chemotherapy to increase tumor regression. We describe our initial experience performed in an expert hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) French center to demonstrate the safety and the feasibility of PIPAC. METHODS Between January 2016 and March 2019, PIPAC was proposed to 43 consecutive patients affected by digestive, ovarian, peritoneal and mammary carcinomatosis. Initially PIPAC was proposed to patients non eligible for cytoreductive surgery for palliative purposes. In five patients we associated PIPAC to systemic chemotherapy to improve tumor regression and enhance the chance of patients to undergo HIPEC. Three PIPAC treatments were supposed to be performed for each patient with an interval of 6 weeks in between each procedure. Peritoneal biopsies were always performed to evaluate microscopic tumor regression. In case of postoperative clinical deterioration or quick tumor progression during the cycles, PIPAC was interrupted. Depending on the primary tumor, chemotherapies used were oxaliplatin or a combination of cisplatin and doxorubicin. RESULTS Twenty-six (60.4%) patients have already had a surgical resection or intervention of primary cancer removal. In 5 patients abdominal access was impossible. Of the 38 patients operated, seventy-one procedures were performed. In the series, one patient died because of tumor progression. Only one major complication occurred intraoperatively. Two of thirteen patients receiving oxaliplatin had postoperative abdominal pain and needed more drugs assumption and a longer hospitalization. Three patients after a three cycles procedure underwent HIPEC. Nine of the patients who had at least two PIPACs had last biopsies showing a major or complete tumor response. CONCLUSION PIPAC is a safe and feasible procedure that can be performed in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis initially not eligible for surgery to reduce tumor invasion or for palliation to reduce symptoms. Contraindications are bowel obstruction and multiple intraabdominal adhesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Ceribelli
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Archet 2 University Hospital, Nice, France.
| | - T Debs
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Archet 2 University Hospital, Nice, France
| | - A Chevallier
- Department of Pathology, Archet 2 University Hospital, Nice, France
| | - M A Piche
- Department of Pathology, Archet 2 University Hospital, Nice, France
| | - J M Bereder
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Archet 2 University Hospital, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maubert A, Birtwisle L, Bernard JL, Benizri E, Bereder JM. Can machine learning predict resecability of a peritoneal carcinomatosis? Surg Oncol 2019; 29:120-125. [PMID: 31196475 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2019] [Accepted: 04/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 20% of initially eligible patients in a HIPEC procedure eventually underwent a simple surgical exploration. These procedures are called 'open & close' (O & C) representing up to 48% of surgery. The objective of this study was to predict the resecability of peritoneal carcinomatosis using a machine-learning model for decision-making support, for eligible patients of HIPEC. METHODS The study was conducted as an intention to treat based on three databases including a prospective, between January 2000 and December 2015. A propensity score allowed us to obtain two groups of comparable and matched patients. Subsequently, several algorithm models of classification were studied (simple classification, conditional tree, support vector machine, random forest) to determine the model having the best performance and accuracy. RESULTS Two groups of 155 patients were obtained: one group without resection and one group with resection. Nine criteria of non-resecability reflecting the organ involvement have been retained. They were coded according to their importance. Five classification algorithms were tested. The training data included 218 patients and 92 test data. The random forest model exhibited the best performance with an accuracy of close to 98%. Only two errors of predictions were observed. DISCUSSION The largest number of patients will allow us to improve the precision prediction. Gathering more data such as biologic, radiologic, and even laparoscopic features, should improve the knowledge of the disease and decrease the number of 'O & C' procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Maubert
- General and Oncology Surgery Unit, Archet 2 Hospital, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.
| | - L Birtwisle
- General and Oncology Surgery Unit, Archet 2 Hospital, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France
| | - J L Bernard
- General and Oncology Surgery Unit, Archet 2 Hospital, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France
| | - E Benizri
- General and Oncology Surgery Unit, Archet 2 Hospital, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France
| | - J M Bereder
- General and Oncology Surgery Unit, Archet 2 Hospital, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kepenekian V, Elias D, Passot G, Mery E, Goere D, Delroeux D, Quenet F, Ferron G, Pezet D, Guilloit JM, Meeus P, Pocard M, Bereder JM, Abboud K, Arvieux C, Brigand C, Marchal F, Classe JM, Lorimier G, De Chaisemartin C, Guyon F, Mariani P, Ortega-Deballon P, Isaac S, Maurice C, Gilly FN, Glehen O. Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: Evaluation of systemic chemotherapy with comprehensive treatment through the RENAPE Database: Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study. Eur J Cancer 2016; 65:69-79. [PMID: 27472649 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2016] [Revised: 05/26/2016] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a severe disease with mainly locoregional evolution. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is the reported treatment with the longest survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of perioperative systemic chemotherapy strategies on survival and postoperative outcomes in patients with DMPM treated with curative intent with CRS-HIPEC, using a multi-institutional database: the French RENAPE network. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1991 to 2014, 126 DMPM patients underwent CRS-HIPEC at 20 tertiary centres. The population was divided into four groups according to perioperative treatment: only neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NA), only adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ), perioperative chemotherapy (PO) and no chemotherapy before or after CRS-HIPEC (NoC). RESULTS All groups (NA: n = 42; ADJ: n = 16; PO: n = 16; NoC: n = 48) were comparable regarding clinicopathological data and main DMPM prognostic factors. After a median follow-up of 61 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 40%, 67%, 62% and 56% in NA, ADJ, PO and NoC groups, respectively (P = 0.049). Major complications occurred for 41%, 45%, 35% and 41% of patients from NA, ADJ, PO and NoC groups, respectively (P = 0.299). In multivariate analysis, NA was independently associated with worse OS (hazard ratio, 2.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-4.94; P = 0.033). CONCLUSION This retrospective study suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy may delay recurrence and improve survival and that NA may impact negatively the survival for patients with DMPM who underwent CRS-HIPEC with curative intent. Upfront CRS and HIPEC should be considered when achievable, waiting for stronger level of scientific evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Kepenekian
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - D Elias
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris, France
| | - G Passot
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - E Mery
- Department of Pathology, IUCT, Toulouse, France
| | - D Goere
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris, France
| | - D Delroeux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Jean Minjoz University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - F Quenet
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Val d'Aurelle Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - G Ferron
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute - IUCT, Toulouse, France
| | - D Pezet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - J M Guilloit
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Francois Baclesse Comprehensive Cancer Center, Caen, France
| | - P Meeus
- Department of Surgery, Léon Bérard Comprehensive Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - M Pocard
- Surgical Oncologic & Digestive Unit, Lariboisière University Hospital, INSERM, U 965, Paris, France
| | - J M Bereder
- Department of General Surgery and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Archet 2 University Hospital, Nice, France
| | - K Abboud
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France
| | - C Arvieux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Michallon University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - C Brigand
- Department of General Surgery, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - F Marchal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lorraine Institute of Oncology, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - J M Classe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, René Gauducheau Integrated Center of Oncology, Nantes, France
| | - G Lorimier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paul Papin Integrated Center of Oncology, Angers, France
| | - C De Chaisemartin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - F Guyon
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - P Mariani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Curie Institute, Paris, France
| | - P Ortega-Deballon
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - S Isaac
- Department of Pathology, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - C Maurice
- Clinical Research Unit, Pôle IMER (Information Médicale Evaluation et Recherche), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - F N Gilly
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - O Glehen
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ferron G, Simon L, Guyon F, Glehen O, Goere D, Elias D, Pocard M, Gladieff L, Bereder JM, Brigand C, Classe JM, Guilloit JM, Quenet F, Abboud K, Arvieux C, Bibeau F, De Chaisemartin C, Delroeux D, Durand-Fontanier S, Goasguen N, Gouthi L, Heyd B, Kianmanesh R, Leblanc E, Loi V, Lorimier G, Marchal F, Mariani P, Mariette C, Meeus P, Msika S, Ortega-Deballon P, Paineau J, Pezet D, Piessen G, Pirro N, Pomel C, Porcheron J, Pourcher G, Rat P, Regimbeau JM, Sabbagh C, Thibaudeau E, Torrent JJ, Tougeron D, Tuech JJ, Zinzindohoue F, Lundberg P, Herin F, Villeneuve L. Professional risks when carrying out cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal malignancy with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): A French multicentric survey. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41:1361-7. [PMID: 26263848 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2015] [Revised: 07/10/2015] [Accepted: 07/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the last two decades, many surgical teams have developed programs to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis with extensive cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Currently, there are no specific recommendations for HIPEC procedures concerning environmental contamination risk management, personal protective equipment (PPE), or occupational health supervision. METHODS A survey of the institutional practices among all French teams currently performing HIPEC procedures was carried out via the French network for the treatment of rare peritoneal malignancies (RENAPE). RESULTS Thirty three surgical teams responded, 14 (42.4%) which reported more than 10 years of HIPEC experience. Some practices were widespread, such as using HIPEC machine approved by the European Community (100%), individualized or centralized smoke evacuation (81.8%), "open" abdominal coverage during perfusion (75.8%), and maintaining the same surgeon throughout the procedure (69.7%). Others were more heterogeneous, including laminar flow air circulation (54.5%) and the provision of safety protocols in the event of perfusate spills (51.5%). The use of specialized personal protective equipment is ubiquitous (93.9%) but widely variable between programs. CONCLUSION Protocols regarding cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC and the associated professional risks in France lack standardization and should be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ferron
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute - IUCT, Toulouse, France.
| | - L Simon
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute - IUCT, Toulouse, France
| | - F Guyon
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - O Glehen
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France; EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - D Goere
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - D Elias
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - M Pocard
- Surgical Oncologic & Digestive Unit, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France; INSERM, U 965, Paris, France
| | - L Gladieff
- Department of Medical Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute - IUCT, Toulouse, France
| | - J M Bereder
- Department of General Surgery, Archet 2 University Hospital, Nice, France
| | - C Brigand
- Department of General Surgery, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - J M Classe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, René Gauducheau Cancer Center, Nantes, France
| | - J M Guilloit
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Francois Baclesse Comprehensive Cancer Center, Caen, France
| | - F Quenet
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Val d'Aurelle Montpellier Cancer Center, Montpellier, France
| | - K Abboud
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France
| | - C Arvieux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Michallon University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - F Bibeau
- Department of Pathology, Val d'Aurelle Montpellier Cancer Center, Montpellier, France
| | - C De Chaisemartin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - D Delroeux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Jean Minjoz University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - S Durand-Fontanier
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Transplantation, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - N Goasguen
- Department of General Surgery, Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon Group Hospital, Paris, France
| | - L Gouthi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - B Heyd
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Jean Minjoz University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - R Kianmanesh
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - E Leblanc
- Department of Gynaecological Surgery, Oscar Lambret Cancer Center, Lille, France
| | - V Loi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - G Lorimier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paul Papin Cancer Center, Angers, France
| | - F Marchal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lorraine Institute of Oncology, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - P Mariani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Curie Institute, Paris, France
| | - C Mariette
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Claude-Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - P Meeus
- Department of Surgery, Léon Bérard Comprehensive Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - S Msika
- Department of Surgery, Louis Mourier University Hospital, Colombes, France
| | - P Ortega-Deballon
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - J Paineau
- Department of Surgical Oncology, René Gauducheau Cancer Center, Nantes, France
| | - D Pezet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - G Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Claude-Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - N Pirro
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Timône University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - C Pomel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Jean Perrin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - J Porcheron
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France
| | - G Pourcher
- Department of General Surgery, Antoine-Béclère University Hospital, Clamart, France
| | - P Rat
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - J M Regimbeau
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Amiens, Amiens, France
| | - C Sabbagh
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Amiens, Amiens, France
| | - E Thibaudeau
- Department of Surgical Oncology, René Gauducheau Cancer Center, Nantes, France
| | - J J Torrent
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - D Tougeron
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - J J Tuech
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Charles Nicolle University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - F Zinzindohoue
- Department of Digestive and General Surgery, G. Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France
| | - P Lundberg
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France; EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - F Herin
- Department of Occupational Medicine, University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - L Villeneuve
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Information Médicale Evaluation Recherche, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Lyon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bakrin N, Bereder JM, Decullier E, Classe JM, Msika S, Lorimier G, Abboud K, Meeus P, Ferron G, Quenet F, Marchal F, Gouy S, Morice P, Pomel C, Pocard M, Guyon F, Porcheron J, Glehen O. Peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with cytoreductive surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced ovarian carcinoma: a French multicentre retrospective cohort study of 566 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39:1435-43. [PMID: 24209430 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 188] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2013] [Revised: 09/23/2013] [Accepted: 09/27/2013] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite a high response rate to front-line therapy, prognosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) remains poor. Approaches that combine Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been developed recently. The purpose of this study was to assess early and long-term survival in patients treated with this strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort multicentric study from French centres was performed. All consecutive patients with advanced and recurrent EOC treated with CRS and HIPEC were included. RESULTS The study included 566 patients from 13 centres who underwent 607 procedures between 1991 and 2010. There were 92 patients with advanced EOC (first-line treatment), and 474 patients with recurrent EOC. A complete cytoreductive surgery was performed in 74.9% of patients. Mortality and grades 3 to 4 morbidity rates were 0.8% and 31.3%, respectively. The median overall survivals were 35.4 months and 45.7 months for advanced and recurrent EOC, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with chemosensitive and with chemoresistant recurrence. Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) that evaluated disease extent was the strongest independent prognostic factor for overall and disease-free survival in all groups. CONCLUSION For advanced and recurrent EOC, curative therapeutic approach combining optimal CRS and HIPEC should be considered as it may achieve long-term survival in patients with a severe prognosis disease, even in patients with chemoresistant disease. PCI should be used for patient's selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Bakrin
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pierre Bénite, France; Université Lyon 1, EMR 3738, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bakrin N, Gilly FN, Baratti D, Bereder JM, Quenet F, Lorimier G, Mohamed F, Elias D, Glehen O. Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma treated by cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. A multi-institutional study of 36 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39:742-7. [PMID: 23510853 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2012] [Revised: 02/12/2013] [Accepted: 02/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) is a rare condition, histologically identical to ovarian serous carcinoma and often diagnosed at late stage. There is not any standardized treatment for PPSC. A retrospective multicentric study was performed in French speaking centers to evaluate cytoreduction surgery and Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from different origins. The manuscript's aim was to study the particular population with PPSC. METHODS Between September 1997 and July 2007, 36 patients with PPSC from 9 institutions underwent 39 procedures. RESULTS Mortality and morbidity rates were 5.6% and 20.6% respectively. The overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years are respectively 93.6, 71.5 and 57.4%. The median overall survival was not reached. By univariate analysis, the only factor that had prognostic value was PCI (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS The therapeutic approach combining cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC may achieve long-term survival in patients with PPSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Bakrin
- Surgical Oncology Department, Lyon Civil Hospices, South Lyon University Hospital Center, 165 chemin du grand Revoyet, 69365 Pierre Bénite, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bakrin N, Cotte E, Golfier F, Gilly FN, Freyer G, Helm W, Glehen O, Bereder JM. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for persistent and recurrent advanced ovarian carcinoma: a multicenter, prospective study of 246 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19:4052-8. [PMID: 22825772 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2510-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2011] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epithelial ovarian carcinoma is the main cause of death from gynaecological cancers in the western world. The initial response rate to the frontline therapy is high. However, the prognosis of persistent and recurrent disease remains poor. During the two past decades, a new therapeutic approach to peritoneal carcinomatosis has been developed, combining maximal cytoreductive effort with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS A retrospective, multicentric study of 246 patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian cancer, treated by cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in two French centers between 1991 and 2008, was performed. RESULTS An optimal cytoreductive surgery was possible in 92.2 % of patients. Mortality and morbidity rates were 0.37 % and 11.6 %, respectively. The overall median survival was 48.9 months. There was no significant difference in overall survival in patients with persistent or recurrent disease. In multivariate analysis, performance status was a significant prognostic factor in patients with extensive peritoneal carcinomatosis (peritoneal cancer index >10). CONCLUSIONS Salvage therapy combining optimal cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC is feasible and may achieve long-term survival in highly selected patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma, including those with platinum resistant disease, with acceptable morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Bakrin
- Department of Oncologic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Elias D, Gilly F, Quenet F, Bereder JM, Sidéris L, Mansvelt B, Lorimier G, Glehen O. Pseudomyxoma peritonei: a French multicentric study of 301 patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2010. [PMID: 20227231 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.01006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze a large series of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) treated with cytoreductive surgery associated with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) in 18 French-speaking centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS From March 1993 to December 2007, 301 patients with diffuse PMP were treated by cytoreductive surgery with PIC. Complete cytoreductive surgery was achieved in 219 patients (73%), and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was performed in 255 (85%), mainly during the latter period of the study. RESULTS Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 4.4% and 40%, respectively. The mean follow-up was 88 months. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 73% and 56%, respectively. The multivariate analysis identified 5 prognostic factors: the extent of peritoneal seeding (p=0.004), the center (p=0.0004), the pathologic grade (p=0.03), gender (p=0.02), and the use of HIPEC (p=0.04). When only the 206 patients with complete cytoreductive surgery were considered, the extent of peritoneal seeding was the only significant prognostic factor (p=0.004). CONCLUSION This large multicentric retrospective study confirms that cytoreductive surgery combined with PIC (with the use of hyperthermia) should be considered as the gold standard treatment of PMP and should be performed in specialized centers. It underlines the prognostic impact of the extent of peritoneal seeding, especially in patients treated by complete cytoreductive surgery. This prognostic impact appears to be greater than that of the pathologic grade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Elias
- Department of Oncologic Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 Rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif Cédex, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Elias D, Gilly F, Quenet F, Bereder JM, Sidéris L, Mansvelt B, Lorimier G, Glehen O. Pseudomyxoma peritonei: a French multicentric study of 301 patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2010; 36:456-62. [PMID: 20227231 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2009] [Accepted: 01/18/2010] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze a large series of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) treated with cytoreductive surgery associated with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) in 18 French-speaking centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS From March 1993 to December 2007, 301 patients with diffuse PMP were treated by cytoreductive surgery with PIC. Complete cytoreductive surgery was achieved in 219 patients (73%), and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was performed in 255 (85%), mainly during the latter period of the study. RESULTS Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 4.4% and 40%, respectively. The mean follow-up was 88 months. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 73% and 56%, respectively. The multivariate analysis identified 5 prognostic factors: the extent of peritoneal seeding (p=0.004), the center (p=0.0004), the pathologic grade (p=0.03), gender (p=0.02), and the use of HIPEC (p=0.04). When only the 206 patients with complete cytoreductive surgery were considered, the extent of peritoneal seeding was the only significant prognostic factor (p=0.004). CONCLUSION This large multicentric retrospective study confirms that cytoreductive surgery combined with PIC (with the use of hyperthermia) should be considered as the gold standard treatment of PMP and should be performed in specialized centers. It underlines the prognostic impact of the extent of peritoneal seeding, especially in patients treated by complete cytoreductive surgery. This prognostic impact appears to be greater than that of the pathologic grade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Elias
- Department of Oncologic Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 Rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif Cédex, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Glehen O, Elias D, Gilly FN, Boutitie F, Bereder JM, Quenet F, Sideris L, Mansvelt B, Lorimier G. Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis from digestive or primitive origin: A multi-institutional study of 1,290 patients. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.4102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4102 Background: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from non-gynecologic malignancies has long been regarded a terminal disease with a short median survival. Over the past decade, new locoregional therapeutic approaches combining cytoreductive surgery with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) have evolved and suggest improved survival. Methods: A retrospective multicentric study was performed in French speaking centers to evaluate the toxicity and the principal prognostic factors in order to identify the best indications. All patients had cytoreductive surgery and PIC (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and or early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC)). Results: The study included 1290 patients from 25 institutions between February 1989 and December 2007. The principal etiologies of PC were colorectal adenocarcinoma (N=523), pseudomyxoma peritonei (N=301), gastric adenocarcinoma (N=159), peritoneal mesothelioma (N=88), and appendiceal adenocarcinoma (N=50). Mortality and morbidity rates were 4.1% and 33.8%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, age, extent of the PC, and the institution's experience had a significant influence on toxicity. The overall median survival was 34 months: 30 months for colorectal PC, not reached for pseudomyxoma peritonei, 9 months for gastric PC, 41 months for peritoneal mesothelioma, and 77 months for PC from appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Independent prognostic indicators by multivariate analysis were the institution's experience, etiology, completeness of cytoreductive surgery, extent of carcinomatosis, and lymph node involvement. Conclusions: The therapeutic approach combining cytoreductive surgery with PIC may achieve long-term survival in a selected group of patients with PC from non-gynecologic origin with acceptable mortality and morbidity. This treatment should be reserved to experienced institutions involved in the management of PC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O. Glehen
- Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Archet II, Nice, France; Centre Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montréal, QC, Canada; Hopital de Jolimont, Maine St Paul, Belgium; Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - D. Elias
- Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Archet II, Nice, France; Centre Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montréal, QC, Canada; Hopital de Jolimont, Maine St Paul, Belgium; Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - F. N. Gilly
- Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Archet II, Nice, France; Centre Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montréal, QC, Canada; Hopital de Jolimont, Maine St Paul, Belgium; Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - F. Boutitie
- Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Archet II, Nice, France; Centre Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montréal, QC, Canada; Hopital de Jolimont, Maine St Paul, Belgium; Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - J. M. Bereder
- Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Archet II, Nice, France; Centre Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montréal, QC, Canada; Hopital de Jolimont, Maine St Paul, Belgium; Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - F. Quenet
- Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Archet II, Nice, France; Centre Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montréal, QC, Canada; Hopital de Jolimont, Maine St Paul, Belgium; Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - L. Sideris
- Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Archet II, Nice, France; Centre Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montréal, QC, Canada; Hopital de Jolimont, Maine St Paul, Belgium; Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - B. Mansvelt
- Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Archet II, Nice, France; Centre Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montréal, QC, Canada; Hopital de Jolimont, Maine St Paul, Belgium; Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - G. Lorimier
- Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Archet II, Nice, France; Centre Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montréal, QC, Canada; Hopital de Jolimont, Maine St Paul, Belgium; Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Glehen O, Kwiatkowski F, Sugarbaker PH, Elias D, Levine EA, De Simone M, Barone R, Yonemura Y, Cavaliere F, Quenet F, Gutman M, Tentes AAK, Lorimier G, Bernard JL, Bereder JM, Porcheron J, Gomez-Portilla A, Shen P, Deraco M, Rat P. Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional study. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:3284-92. [PMID: 15310771 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 840] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The three principal studies dedicated to the natural history of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer consistently showed median survival ranging between 6 and 8 months. New approaches combining cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy suggest improved survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective multicenter study was performed to evaluate the international experience with this combined treatment and to identify the principal prognostic indicators. All patients had cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia and/or immediate postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy). PC from appendiceal origin was excluded. RESULTS The study included 506 patients from 28 institutions operated between May 1987 and December 2002. Their median age was 51 years. The median follow-up was 53 months. The morbidity and mortality rates were 22.9% and 4%, respectively. The overall median survival was 19.2 months. Patients in whom cytoreductive surgery was complete had a median survival of 32.4 months, compared with 8.4 months for patients in whom complete cytoreductive surgery was not possible (P <.001). Positive independent prognostic indicators by multivariate analysis were complete cytoreduction, treatment by a second procedure, limited extent of PC, age less than 65 years, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, lymph node involvement, presence of liver metastasis, and poor histologic differentiation were negative independent prognostic indicators. CONCLUSION The therapeutic approach combining cytoreductive surgery with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy achieved long-term survival in a selected group of patients with PC from colorectal origin with acceptable morbidity and mortality. The complete cytoreductive surgery was the most important prognostic indicator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Glehen
- Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cals L, Rixe O, François E, Favre R, Merad L, Deplanque G, Laadem A, Juin P, Bereder JM, Bernardini D, Herait P. Dose-finding study of weekly 24-h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil associated with alternating oxaliplatin or irinotecan in advanced colorectal cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2004; 15:1018-24. [PMID: 15205194 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine maximum tolerated dose, safety and efficacy of weekly 24 h infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined alternately with oxaliplatin and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS Advanced colorectal carcinoma patients in first- or second-line chemotherapy received increasing doses of 5-FU (weekly 24 h continuous intravenous infusion without leucovorin) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, irinotecan days 1 and 15; and oxaliplatin days 8 and 22, every 35 days. RESULTS Thirty-four patients received 175 cycles. The median age was 64 years (range 47-78). Eighteen per cent of patients had the primary tumor in the rectum, with a median of one disease site (range one to three), and liver involvement in 88% and lung in 38%. Six (18%) patients had chemotherapy for prior advanced disease. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (41% of patients), but the regimen was well tolerated clinically, with febrile neutropenia in two patients and grade 4 neutropenia lasting >7 days in one; grade 3-4 diarrhea, nausea and vomiting in 6% of patients; grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy in 9% of patients. Seventeen patients had a partial response (50%; 95% confidence interval 33%-67%), 13 had stable disease and one had progressive disease. Five patients underwent metastatic surgical resection after tumor shrinkage. Median response duration was 14 months (range 4.7-29.2+) and median time to progression was 11.3 months (range 1.1+-30.7+). CONCLUSIONS This combination three-drug regimen is feasible and well tolerated without toxicity overlap. Preliminary antitumor activity compares well with standard double combinations, with an unusually long median time to progression. The recommended dose is 5-FU 3000 mg/m(2), weekly for 4 weeks, irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) days 1 and 15, oxaliplatin 80 mg/m(2) days 8 and 22. Further assessment of antitumor activity and safety is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Cals
- Fédération de Cancérologie des Etablissements Privés/Publics de la région PACA-Corse, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Obstetrical hemorrhage is a severe complication with vital prognosis at stake. Treatment depends on aetiology: a surgical procedure may be indicated initially or after failure of medical management. Radical treatment with hemostasis hysterectomy is generally successful. However, in case of persistent hemorrhage after hysterectomy, other means are available such as pelvic tamponade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Agostini
- Service d'obstétrique et gynécologie, hôpital la Conception, 147, boulevard Baille, 13385 Marseille, France.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mazza D, Bereder I, Carret V, Guerder A, Bereder JM. [Adenocarcinoma of the common bile duct and celiac disease]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2001; 25:207-8. [PMID: 11319451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
|
16
|
Mazza D, Bereder I, Carret V, Bereder JM. Laparoscopic removal of intragastric foreign bodies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2000; 10:329-31. [PMID: 11083220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
Ingestion of foreign bodies is a common happening for prison inmates. When such bodies do not pass, endoscopic or surgical retrieval is necessary. The authors report the case of a young patient in whom endoscopy failed to retrieve several intragastric foreign bodies. He was treated successfully by laparoscopic gastrotomy. The authors think that this approach is a valid alternative to laparotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Mazza
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Font-Pré Hospital, Toulon, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
The prevalence of splenic metastasis from carcinomas varies between 2% and 13% in autopsy studies. Most of them are clinically inapparent. We report herein the case of a splenic metastasis revealing breast carcinoma in a 73-year old woman. Splenectomy was performed to correct hypersplenism. Macroscopically, the cut surface of the spleen was uniform and pale. On microscopical examination, the metastatic infiltration involved both red and white pulp as single cells, cords and micro-nodules. Tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). The breast origin of this splenic metastasis was supported by the increase of CA 15-3 level, and by the appearance of axillary lymphadenopathy. In addition, the red pulp sinuses were obliterated by multiple thrombi at different stages of development and the splenic cords were collagenized. These changes could result from an unusual stromal reaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Chapel
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Font-Pré, Toulon, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Quilichini R, Chapel F, Bereder JM, Mazzerbo F, Zanlucca S, Baume D. [Peritoneal mesothelioma. A new case]. Presse Med 1997; 26:1238. [PMID: 9380625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
|
19
|
Benchimol D, Firtion O, Bereder JM, Chazal M, Bourgeon A, Richelme H. [Acute pancreatitis treated in a surgery ward. Apropos of 57 cases]. J Chir (Paris) 1996; 133:208-13. [PMID: 8999041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the results of a policy in the treatment of acute pancreatitis (AP): initial abstention, management in intensive care unit, surgery in cases of complication (infection and/or failure of medical treatment). The modalities of the surgical treatment were guided by CT scan findings: transperitoneal approach for diffuse lesions, posterior approach for localized lesions. From 1986 to 1994, 57 patients (32 males, 25 females, mean age 59.2 years) were referred to our department for AP. Etiology was gallstones in 29 cases, alcohol in 14 cases (Ranson < 3), moderate in 27 cases (Ranson < or = 5) and serious in 12 cases (Ranson > or = 6). According to the initial CT scan findings (56 cases), 9 patients were classified grade A, 11 grade B, 13 grade C, 8 grade D ans 15 grade E. Thirty eight patients were managed conservatively (mean Ranson stage 3.3), while 19 patients underwent surgical treatment (mean Ranson stage 4.6), in emergency for misdiagnosis (4 cases), or secondarily because of failure of medical management (15 cases). Surgery consisted in necrosectomy with active drainage in 13 cases and drainage alone in 6 cases. Associated maneuvers included: cholecystectomy in 8 cases, cholecystostomy in 2 cases, jejunostomy in 7 cases and colic resection for necrosis in 3 cases. Two patients (5%) managed conservatively died (multiple organ failure and cardiac insufficiency) while 4 patients (21%: NS) who underwent surgery died (2 multiple organ failures, 1 septic shock, 1 myocardic infarction). Mortality was correlated with the Ranson score: 42% for serious AP, 3.7% for moderate AP and nil for mild AP (p < 0.01). It was not correlated with CT scan grade, the onset or the type of operation. These results allow us to conclude that surgical treatment should be indicated only in cases of failure of conservative management, the best indication being uncontrolled sepsis. In this situation, active drainage provides good results since only one sepsis recurred among the 14 patients who underwent this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Benchimol
- Service de Chirurgie Abdominale et Thoracique, Hôpital Pasteur, Nice
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Perrin C, Chavaillon JM, Bereder JM, Hofman P, Blaive B. [Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia complicated by compressive pneumomediastinum]. Presse Med 1992; 21:821. [PMID: 1535144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
|
21
|
Lagrange JL, Chauvel P, François E, Bourry J, Benchimol D, Bereder JM, Machiavello JC, Richelme H. [Conservative treatment of epidermoid cancer of the anal canal combining radiotherapy and curietherapy. Experience at the Antoine-Lacassagne Center]. Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol (Paris) 1990; 26:45-9. [PMID: 2189353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
From 1973 to 1987, 33 patients aged from 46 to 86 years (25 female, 8 male) were treated for a tumour of the anal canal with radiotherapy and curietherapy. Tumour distribution was 7 T1, 19 T2, 7 T3, and 4 patients were N+. After treatment it was possible to assess 31 patients; 29 were in complete remission, remission was obtained in 2 others following surgery. Tolerance was comparable to other series but 4 patients developed necrosis of the anal canal; 2 patients died under general anesthesia and 1 patient had a radiation injury of the small intestine. The sphincter was conserved in 65 p. cent of cases. Relapse occurred in 8 patients within 6-92 months, and 6 patients developed metastases. Overall survival was 78 p. cent at 3 years and 74 p. cent at 5 and 10 years. Disease-free survival was 65 p. cent at 3 and 5 years and 52 p. cent at 10 years. Our results confirm those of other series using a similar treatment plan. This treatment is difficult to put into practice. Patients must be carefully selected preferably by a team including proctologist, surgeon and radiotherapist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L Lagrange
- Service de Radiothérapie, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|