Platysma-sparing vascularized submental lymph node flap transfer for extremity lymphedema

Safety and efficacy of intracranial vascularized submental lymph node transfer for treating hydrocephalus

Hydrocephalus is routinely treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunt drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), a procedure plagued by high morbidity and frequent revisions. Vascularized submental lymph node (VSLN) transplants act as lymphatic pumps to drain interstitial fluid (ISF) from lymphedematous extremities. As the field of neuro-lymphatics comes to fruition, we hypothesize the efficacy of VSLN in the drainage of intracranial CSF-ISF. We report novel placement of VSLN in the temporal subdural space in two patients diagnosed with symptomatic communicating hydrocephalus. At a minimum follow-up of 1 month postoperatively, both experienced radiological and clinical improvements.

Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer Improved Outcomes of Elderly Patients with Secondary Upper Extremity Lymphedema

BACKGROUND

Secondary lymphedema is a debilitating morbidity. This study investigated the outcomes of vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) in elderly patients with secondary upper extremity lymphedema.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2018, elderly (≥65 years) patients with secondary upper extremity lymphedema who underwent VLNT were retrospectively reviewed. Cheng's Lymphedema Grading, Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging, and indocyanine green lymphography were used to select the procedures. Outcome measurements included complications, circumferential difference, episodes of cellulitis, and the Lymphedema-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire (LYMQoL).

RESULTS

Eleven patients with a mean age of 70.2 ± 5.3 years (range 65-80 years) who underwent VLNT survived and no major complications were encountered. At a mean follow-up of 6.5 ± 3.6 years (range 2-13 years), the mean limb circumferential difference was significantly improved from 25.6 ± 11.5% to 8.3 ± 4.2% (p = 0.016), and the mean episode of cellulitis was statistically reduced from 2.4 ± 1.3 to 0.4 ± 0.9 times/year (p = 0.007). At a follow-up of 24 months, four domains of Function (from 30.6 ± 2.8 to 14.5 ± 2.5), Appearance (from 18.2 ± 1.9 to 8.5 ± 2.1), Symptoms (from 30.4 ± 5.9 to 10.9 ± 1.0) and Mood (from 29.2 ± 4.4 to 10.7 ± 1.0), as well as overall LYMQoL score (from 3.9 ± 1.1 to 7.4 ± 0.5), showed statistical improvement (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

VLNT for secondary upper extremity lymphedema in elderly patients significantly decreased the limb circumferential difference and frequency of cellulitis and improved quality of life without using compression garments postoperatively.

Lessons Learnt from an 11-year Experience with Lymphatic Surgery and a Systematic Review of Reported Complications: Technical Considerations to Reduce Morbidity

Complications experienced during lymphatic surgery have not been ubiquitously reported, and little has been described regarding how to prevent them. We present a review of complications reported during the surgical management of lymphedema and our experience with technical considerations to reduce morbidity from lymphatic surgery. A comprehensive search across different databases was conducted through November 2020. Based on the complications identified, we discussed the best approach for reducing the incidence of complications during lymphatic surgery based on our experience. The most common complications reported following lymphovenous anastomosis were re-exploration of the anastomosis, venous reflux, and surgical site infection. The most common complications using groin vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), submental VLNT, lateral thoracic VLNT, and supraclavicular VLNT included delayed wound healing, seroma and hematoma formation, lymphatic fluid leakage, iatrogenic lymphedema, soft-tissue infection, venous congestion, marginal nerve pseudoparalysis, and partial flap loss. Regarding intra-abdominal lymph node flaps, incisional hernia, hematoma, lymphatic fluid leakage, and postoperative ileus were commonly reported. Following suction-assisted lipectomy, significant blood loss and transient paresthesia were frequently reported. The reported complications of excisional procedures included soft-tissue infections, seroma and hematoma formation, skin-graft loss, significant blood loss, and minor skin flap necrosis. Evidently, lymphedema continues to represent a challenging condition; however, thorough patient selection, compliance with physiotherapy, and an experienced surgeon with adequate understanding of the lymphatic system can help maximize the safety of lymphatic surgery.

Retrograde Manual Lymphatic Drainage following Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer to Distal Recipient Sites for Extremity Lymphedema: A Retrospective Study and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Vascularized lymph node transfer is an efficacious treatment for extremity lymphedema. This study investigated the outcome of retrograde manual lymphatic drainage for vascularized lymph node transfer to distal recipient sites.

METHODS

Lymphedema patients who underwent either complete decongestive therapy or vascularized lymph node transfer between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively included. Retrograde manual lymphatic drainage was started with intermittent manual compression and the assistance of a sphygmomanometer and proximal-to-distal massage of the limb 1 month postoperatively. Outcomes evaluations used the circumferential reduction rate and the Lymphedema-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. Outcomes of vascularized lymph node transfer to proximal versus distal recipient sites in the literature between 2006 and 2018 were also compared.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-eight unilateral extremity lymphedema patients, including 68 patients in the complete decongestive therapy group and 70 patients in the vascularized lymph node transfer group, were included. The mean circumferential reduction rate of 38.9 ± 2.5 percent in the vascularized lymph node transfer group was statistically greater than the 13.2 ± 10.1 percent rate in the complete decongestive therapy group (p = 0.01). At a mean follow-up of 36 months, the improvement of overall Lymphedema-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire score from 3.8 ± 0.3 to 7.5 ± 1.8 in the vascularized lymph node transfer group was statistically greater than that in the complete decongestive therapy group (from 4.7 ± 0.9 to 5.0 ± 1.9; p < 0.01). In total, 536 lymphedema patients who underwent 548 vascularized lymph node transfers in 23 published articles were reviewed; the distal recipient-site group was found to have more efficacious results than the proximal recipient-site group.

CONCLUSION

Vascularized lymph node transfer to a distal recipient site with standard retrograde manual lymphatic drainage significantly improved circumferential reduction rates and Lymphedema-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire scores.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Morbidity of marginal mandibular nerve post vascularized submental lymph node flap transplantation

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the morbidity of the marginal mandibular nerve (MMN) post vascularized submental lymph node (VSLN) harvest.

METHODS

The VSLN with sacrifying or preserving the medial platysma was retrospectively classified as group I or II. Midline deviation and horizontal tilt were subjectively evaluated. Horizontal, vertical, and "area distribution" of the lower lip excursions of the surgical site were objectively compared with the nonsurgical site.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients in group I and 12 patients in group II were included. At a median follow-up of 48.6 ± 16.8 months in group I and 14.8 ± 7.5 months in group II, no MMN palsy was found in both groups. Median midline deviation and horizontal tilt were 4.53 ± 0.52 and 5 ± 0 in group I and 4.67 ± 0.65 and 5 ± 0 in group II, respectively (P = .419 and 1.000). Median horizontal, vertical and area of distribution of lower lip excursions were 97.5 ± 12.3%, 98.8 ± 14.4% and 87.2 ± 14.7% in group I, and 99.3 ± 15.1%, 95.8 ± 8.2% and 84.2 ± 14.2% in group II, respectively (P = .679, .948 and .711).

CONCLUSION

The VSLN flap was a safe procedure with minimal MMN morbidity.

Simultaneous Ipsilateral Vascularized Lymph Node Transplantation and Contralateral Lymphovenous Anastomosis in Bilateral Extremity Lymphedema with Different Severities

Background

Extremity lymphedema can occur bilaterally with different severities on each side. The aim of this study is to investigate the treatment outcomes of such patients with bilateral extremity lymphedema of different severities.

Patients and Methods

Between 2013 and 2017, patients with bilateral extremity lymphedema of different severities according to the Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging (TLS) system were retrospectively reviewed. Ipsilateral vascularized lymph node transplantation (VLNT) was indicated in TLS total obstruction and contralateral lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) in TLS partial obstruction with patent lymphatic vessels on indocyanine green lymphography. Outcomes were assessed using circumference improvement, frequency of cellulitis, and lymphedema-specific quality of life (LYMQoL) questionnaires.

Results

A total of 10 patients with bilateral extremity lymphedema with median age of 63 (range 12–75) years were included. The median symptom duration of the lymphedematous limb was 60 (range 36–168) months and 12 (range 1–60) months in the VLNT and LVA group, respectively (p < 0.05). At average follow-up of 37.5 (range 14–58) months, the average limb circumference improvement was 2.4 (range − 3.3 to 7.8) cm in the VLNT group and 2.3 (range 0.3–7) cm in the LVA group (p = 1). The median episodes of cellulitis decreased significantly from 4 to 0.5 and 1 to 0 times/year in the VLNT and LVA group, respectively (p = 0.02, p = 0.06). The overall LYMQoL score improved from 4.5 preoperatively to 7.5 postoperatively (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Limb-specific VLNT and LVA selected by TLS effectively treated bilateral extremity lymphedema with different severities.

Surgical anatomy of vascularized submental lymph node flap: Sharing arterial supply of lymph nodes with the skin and topographic relationship with anterior belly of digastric muscle

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Development of vascularized submental lymph node (VSLN) flap has encountered dilemmas; (a) whether to include skin paddle, (b) how to reduce the harvest area while gaining most lymph nodes. To answer, these structures were studied; submental perforator, lymph nodes in neck-level I and anterior belly of digastric muscle (ABDM).

METHODS

Forty VSLN flaps were harvested from 23 cadavers. The lymph nodes and arterial supply were studied macro- and microscopically. The nodes were classified by arterial supplies, location along the longitudinal axis and relationship with ABDM.

RESULTS

VSLN flap had 4.4 lymph nodes by average (range 1-8) predominantly located in the posterior three-quarter of the flap. Half of the submental perforators were originated deep to ABDM. they circumvent the muscle, supplied much of the nodes in neck sublevel Ia before reaching the skin. While sublevel Ib located the most surgically accessible submental nodes. Most of their arterial supply was branched from submental perforator lateral to ABDM, not directly from the submental artery.

CONCLUSION

The flap could be reduced to the posterior three-quarter of the original area. Skin paddle should be included to serve as an indirect lymph node monitor. If Ia lymph nodes are to be included, ABDM should be sacrified.

Delayed primary retention suture for inset of vascularized submental lymph node flap for lower extremity lymphedema

BACKGROUND

Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) has become one of the effective surgical treatments for extremity lymphedema. This study was to evaluate the re-exploration and total complication rates of VLNT for lower extremity lymphedema between two different flap inset techniques.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients who underwent 74 submental VLNT transfers between 2008 and 2018 were retrospectively studied. Fifty-six flaps were inset using a new delayed primary retention suture (DPRS) technique and other 18 flaps using conventional interrupted sutures as the non-DPRS group.

RESULTS

The overall flap success rate was 100%. The DPRS group was released at a mean of 1.7  ± 0.7 times and took a mean of 10.3 ± 3.3 days for wound closure. There were no statistical differences in demographics, mean symptom duration, and mean Cheng's Lymphedema Grading between two groups. Mean frequency of cellulitis of 2.5 ± 1.5 times/year in non-DPRS group was significantly greater than 1.4 ± 1.6 times/year in DPRS group (P = .01). The re-exploration and total complication rates were 5.4% and 7.1% in DPRS group, and 27.8% and 33.3% in non-DPRS group, respectively (P = .02 and .02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The DPRS technique is a safe, simple, and reliable method for insetting the submental VLNT, which statistically decreased the re-exploration and total complication rates.

Long-term outcome of lower extremity lymphedema treated with vascularized lymph node flap transfer with or without venous complications

BACKGROUND

Vascularized submental lymph node (VSLN) transfer is an emerging approach for extremity lymphedema. This study investigated the long-term outcome and venous complications of VSLN for unilateral lower extremity lymphedema.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2018, patients who underwent VSLN for unilateral lower extremity lymphedema were retrospectively evaluated. Patient demographics, operative records, complications, circumferential improvement, and episodes of cellulitis were analyzed. Further comparisons were performed between different types, numbers, and techniques of venous anastomoses.

RESULTS

A total of 75 VSLNs in 70 patients survived, giving a 100% success rate. Six flaps (8%) had venous complications (VC group) and 69 flaps (92%) did not (No-VC group). There were no statistical differences in types, numbers, and techniques of anastomoses between two groups (P = .65, 1, and .56, respectively). At a mean follow-up of 32.0 ± 23.0 months, mean circumferential improvement and episodes of cellulitis between two groups did not statistically differ significantly (P = .31 and .09, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

VSLN is an effective treatment for lower extremity lymphedema. The types, numbers of veins, and techniques of venous anastomoses did not statistically affect the venous complication rates. Functional outcomes of the VSLNs were not compromised if venous complications were salvaged promptly.

Lymphedema microsurgery reduces the rate of implant removal for patients who have pre-existing lymphedema and total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with pre-existing lymphedema who undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis (OA) are at high risk for periprosthetic joint infection. This complication usually requires removal of the implant. This study aimed to investigate whether surgical treatment of lymphedema reduces the rate of prosthesis removal in such patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our prospective database of patient information collected between January 2009 and December 2018. A total of 348 cases of lower extremity lymphedema were reviewed, and those who underwent total knee TKA for OA of the knee were included. Patient demographics, clinical data, lymphedema surgical history, and TKA surgical history including any episodes of removal were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

There were nine of 15 lymphedema patients with knee OA who subsequently underwent TKA. The mean patient age was 70.4 ± 7.1 years. A total of 18 TKAs were performed in nine patients. The knee prosthesis removal rate was 66.7% (12/18). The prosthesis removal rate was 40% (2/5) in patients who underwent lymphedema microsurgery vs 76.9% (10/13) for those who did not (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-existing lymphedema is associated with a high rate of knee prosthesis removal. Lymphedema microsurgery reduced the removal rate of knee prostheses. We recommend that lymphedema microsurgery be considered for patients who require TKA as a treatment for of the knee.

Management of High-Output Chyle Leak after Harvesting of Vascularized Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes

Vascularized lymph node transfer is a physiologic microsurgical technique used for the treatment of lymphedema. As vascularized lymph node transfer is becoming more common, it is essential that one is aware of all potential complications associated with vascularized lymph node transfer and know how to avoid and manage them when they do occur. The authors recently encountered a complication after supraclavicular vascularized lymph node transfer that has not been previously reported. A patient developed a recalcitrant high-output (>500 ml/day) chyle leak in the neck donor site after supraclavicular vascularized lymph node transfer harvest. In this article, the authors share their experience with massive chyle leak and review the management strategies of how to effectively avoid and treat this potentially dangerous complication. This review of a previously unreported complication of supraclavicular vascularized lymph node transfer is timely and important, as this procedure is increasingly being offered to patients, and surgeons performing these procedures should be familiar with effectively managing this potentially dangerous complication. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Therapeutic, V.

Comparisons of Submental and Groin Vascularized Lymph Node Flaps Transfer for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Background:

The vascularized groin and submental lymph node (VGLN and VSLN) flaps are valuable options in the treatment of lymphedema. This study was to compare outcomes between VGLN and VSLN transfers for breast cancer–related lymphedema.

Methods:

Between January 2008 and December 2016, VGLN and VSLN transfers for upper limb lymphedema were compared including flap characteristics, flap elevation time, complications, and limb circumference changes.

Results:

All flaps survived. Similar vein (2.6 versus 3.2 mm; P = 0.3) and artery diameter (2.1 versus 2.8 mm; P = 0.3) and number of lymph nodes (3 versus 4; P = 0.4) were found between VGLN and VSLN groups, respectively. Circumferential reduction rate was higher in VSLN than VGLN (P = 0.04) group. Vascular complication rate with salvage rate was not statistically different between the 2 groups. Donor-site complication and total complication rates were statistically higher in VGLN than VSLN flaps (7.7% versus 0%, P = 0.004; 46.2% versus 23.3%, P = 0.002). At a mean 39.8 ± 22.4 months, the circumferential reduction rate was statistically higher in VSLN than in the VGLN group (55.5 ± 14.3% versus 48.4 ± 23.9%, P = 0.04). Both flaps were effectively decreased in the episodes of cellulitis.

Conclusions:

Both VGLN and VSLN flaps are valuable surgical options in treating breast cancer–related lymphedema. However, the VSLN flap for breast cancer–related lymphedema is better in providing more significant improvements in limb circumference, a faster flap harvest time, decreased complication rates, and minimal donor-site iatrogenic lymphedema.

[Research progress of vascularized lymph node transfer for extremity lymphedema]

Objective

To review the current progress of clinical and experimental research of vascularized lymph node transfer for lymphedema.

Methods

The domestic and abroad literature about vascularized lymph node transfer in treatment of lymphedema was reviewed and analyzed.

Results

Experimental studies in animal model indicate that vascularized lymph node transfer can improve lymph node survival and show a promising effectiveness in reducing lymphedema. "Lymphatic wick" and "lymph pump" were the two main hypotheses proposed to explain the potential functional mechanism of vascularized lymph node transfer in treatment of lymphedema. Improvement in lymphedema symptoms are reported in most of the clinical trials, but the level of evidence to advocate this procedure in the treatment of lymphedema remains low because of the small number of the cases and problems in their methodologies.

Conclusion

Based on current evidence, vascularized lymph node transfer seems to be a promising treatment for lymphedema, but long-term well-designed studies are required to further explore the effectiveness of this procedure.

The lateral intercostal artery perforator as an alternative donor vessel for free vascularized lymph node transplantation

Chronic lymphedema is caused by an impairment of the lymphatic system due to primary or secondary causes. Vascularized lymph node transplantation (VLNT) is currently the most promising and frequently used technique besides lymphaticovenous anastomosis. However, the vessel anatomy in the lateral thoracic region is sometimes quite variable. Based on our experiences with vascular anatomical inconstancy in the lateral thoracic region, we planned a lateral intercostal artery perforator flap for VLNT in a female patient with chronic stage II lymphedema of both legs after cervical cancer treatment. After surgery, the patient reported significant improvement in limb volume and the accompanying symptoms. The limb circumference was reduced by an average of 19.2% at 6 months postoperatively. Despite having a short pedicle and small vessel caliber, the lateral intercostal artery perforator flap can safely be used for VLNT in lymphedema patients with anatomical variants.

Vascularized lymph node transfer for treatment of extremity lymphedema: An overview of current controversies regarding donor sites, recipient sites and outcomes

As lymphatic microsurgery has become more common, vascularized lymph node transfer ascended to the forefront in many centers for the surgical management of advanced stages of lymphedema showing substantial clinical improvement. However, no consensus has been reached among experts regarding many details of the procedures, including patient selection criteria, type of treatment, donor, and recipient sites and postoperative evaluation of the outcome. Here, we will review these issues and provide the current results of this procedure.

Accurate Prediction of Submental Lymph Nodes Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lymphedema Surgery

Background:

Submental lymph node transfer has proved to be an effective approach for the treatment of lymphedema. This study was to investigate the anatomy and distribution of vascularized submental lymph node (VSLN) flap using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and their clinical outcome.

Methods:

Fifteen patients who underwent 19 VSLN flap transfers for upper or lower limb lymphedema were retrospectively analyzed. The number of submental lymph nodes was compared among preoperative MRI, preoperative sonography, intraoperative finding, postoperative sonography, and postoperative computed tomography angiography. The outcome was compared between preoperatively and postoperatively.

Results:

All 19 VSLN flaps survived. Two hundred fifteen lymph nodes were identified in 30 submandibular regions by MRI. The mean number of submental lymph nodes on preoperative MRI was 7.2 ± 2.4, on preoperative sonography was 3.2 ± 1.1, on intraoperative finding was 3.1 ± 0.6, postoperative sonography was 4.6 ± 1.8, and postoperative CTA was 5.2 ± 1.9. Sixty-one percent of the lymph nodes were located in the central two-quarters of the line drawn from the mental protuberance to the mandibular angle. The actual harvest rate of submental lymph nodes was 72.2%. At a 12-month follow-up, mean episodes of cellulitis were improved from 2.7 ± 0.6 to 0.8 ± 0.2 (P < 0.01); mean of circumferential difference was improved 3.2 ± 0.4 cm (P < 0.03). The overall lymphedema quality-of-life was improved 4.9 ± 0.3 (P < 0.04).

Conclusions:

The preoperative MRI is a useful tool for the detection of mean 7.2 submental lymph nodes. Mean 72.2% of submental lymph nodes can be successfully transferred for extremity lymphedema with optimal functional recovery.