Surgical excision margin for primary acral melanoma: Excision Margin for Acral Melanoma

Surgical resection margin for T3-T4 primary acral melanoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Although the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines include clear recommendations for the appropriate resection margins in non-acral cutaneous melanoma, the required margin for acral melanoma is controversial. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate whether narrow-margin excision is warranted for thick acral melanoma. Records from 277 melanoma patients with stage T3-T4 disease who underwent radical surgery in three centers in China from September 2010 to October 2018 were reviewed. Clinicopathologic data, including age, gender, excision margin (1-2 cm versus ≥ 2 cm), Clark level, Breslow thickness, ulceration, N stage and adjuvant therapy, were included for survival analysis. The patients were followed up until death or March 31, 2021. Log-rank and Cox regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local and in-transit recurrence-free survival (LITRFS). Among all enrolled patients, 207 (74.7%) had acral melanoma, and 70 (25.3%) had non-acral cutaneous melanoma. No significant difference in baseline characteristics was identified between non-acral and acral melanoma, except for age (p = 0.004), gender (p = 0.009) and ulceration (p = 0.048). In non-acral melanoma, a resection margin of 1-2 cm was a poor independent prognostic factor for OS [p = 0.015; hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI), 0.26 (0.009-0.77)] and LITRFS [p = 0.013; HR (95% CI), 0.19 (0.05-0.71)] but not for DFS [p = 0.143; HR (95% CI), 0.51 (0.21-1.25)]. Forty-three (20.8%) patients in the acral melanoma group had a 1-2-cm resection margin. The resection margin was not correlated with patients' OS (p = 0.196 by log-rank analysis, p = 0.865 by multivariate survival analysis), DFS (p = 0.080 by log-rank analysis, p = 0.758 by multivariate survival analysis) or LITRFS (p = 0.354 by log-rank analysis) in acral melanoma. As recommended in the NCCN guidelines, a resection margin ≥ 2 cm is required for non-acral cutaneous melanoma. Meanwhile, a narrow resection margin (1-2 cm) may be safe for patients with acral melanoma.

Evidence from Clinical Studies Related to Dermatologic Surgeries for Skin Cancer

Simple Summary

Although significant progress in pharmacotherapy for skin cancer has been made in the past several years, surgical removal of primary skin cancer is still the first choice of treatment unless distant metastases are evident. In the surgical treatment of primary skin tumors, the surgical margin is critical not only for reducing the possibility of tumor recurrence but also for minimizing the cosmetic and functional complications associated with wide local excision. In contrast, dermatologic surgeries including lymph node dissection and skin graft can cause various complications, and these complications are frequently associated with significant morbidity and discomfort. In this review, we summarize the evidence from previous clinical studies regarding the optimal surgical margin for skin cancer and the methods for diminishing the complications associated with dermatologic surgery.

Abstract

Despite the significant progress made in the past several years in pharmacotherapies for skin cancer, such as BRAF/MEK inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and Hedgehog pathway inhibitors, surgical removal of primary skin cancer is still the first choice of treatment unless distant metastases are evident. In cases of lymph node metastases with clinically palpable lymphadenopathy, lymph node dissection (LND) is typically performed for most skin cancers. In the surgical treatment of primary skin tumors, the surgical margin is critical not only for reducing the possibility of tumor recurrence but also for minimizing the cosmetic and functional complications associated with wide local excision. In contrast, dermatologic surgery can cause various complications. Although skin graft is frequently used for reconstruction of the surgical defect, extensive graft necrosis may develop if optimal stabilization of the graft is not obtained. LND also sometimes causes complications such as intraoperative or postoperative bleeding and postoperative lymphoceles. Moreover, as in other types of surgery, surgical site infection, intraoperative anxiety, and intraoperative and postoperative pain may also develop. These complications are frequently associated with significant morbidity and discomfort. In this review, we summarize the evidence from previous clinical studies regarding the optimal surgical margin for skin cancer and the methods for diminishing the complications associated with dermatologic surgery.

More than just acral melanoma: the controversies of defining the disease

Acral melanoma (AM) is a malignant cutaneous melanocytic tumour specifically located on the palms, soles, and nail apparatus, which are areas of glabrous (hairless) skin. Acral lentiginous melanoma, a subtype of AM, represents a histopathological subtype diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma with unique morphological and structural features. Despite clear definitions, the misuse of these terms and the inconsistency in reporting the histopathological features of AM cases have become a major obstacle to the study of the disease. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology, histopathological features, prognosis, and genetic profile of AM, highlighting the differences observed when histopathological subtypes are considered. The increasing global effort to characterise AM cases from ethnically diverse populations would benefit greatly from a more consistent classification of the disease.

Dermal substitutes: an alternative for the reconstruction of large full-thickness defects in the plantar surface

Large defects in plantar surface secondary to acral melanoma excision can be difficult to repair with local flaps, and skin grafts in weight-bearing surfaces often suffer necrosis causing prolonged disability. Acellular dermal matrices represent an easy alternative to cover deep wounds or those with bone or tendon exposure. Despite their high cost and the requirement of two surgical procedures, this alternative may offer excellent functional and aesthetic results in acral defects.

Slow Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Acral Melanoma Treatment in Korean Patients

BACKGROUND

Obtaining conventional wide surgical margins is challenging in melanomas occurring at anatomically complex sites (e.g., hands and feet).

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the potential benefits of slow Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for acral melanomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study investigated 210 patients who underwent slow MMS (n = 66) or wide local excision (WLE, n = 144) for melanomas during 2005 to 2015. Slow MMS was used for melanomas in anatomically complex locations and for high-risk lesions.

RESULTS

Acral melanoma (166/210) was the most common lesion observed in patients, in addition to head and neck (21/210) and trunk (23/210) melanomas. Slow MMS was more commonly performed for acral, and head and neck melanomas (32.5% and 52.4%, respectively) than for trunk melanomas (4.3%, p = .002). Local recurrence of acral melanomas occurred in 3.7% of patients after slow MMS and in 10.7% of patients after WLE. Multivariate analysis showed comparable prognostic outcomes between slow MMS and WLE used for acral melanomas. Compared with WLE, slow MMS resulted in a smaller postoperative defect after acral lesion excision (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Slow MMS is an effective alternative to WLE for acral melanomas in anatomically complex sites, as evidenced by superior outcomes and maximum tissue conservation.

Acral Lentiginous Melanoma: Do Surgical Approach and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Matter?

Management of acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) remains controversial. Traditionally, ALM was managed with digit amputation (DA), resulting in significant morbidity, but recent evidence has advocated for digit sparing management. Furthermore, the significance of nodal metastasis for ALM is not well reported. The aims of this study were to determine if surgical approach for primary ALM impacts outcomes and to evaluate the predictive value of nodal status for ALM.

Diagnosis and Management of Acral Lentiginous Melanoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Melanoma is one of the most aggressive malignant skin tumors and its incidence has been increasing worldwide in recent decades. Among the four subtypes, acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) shows the highest incidence in Asian countries, whereas ALM comprises only 1% of all melanomas in white populations. Early clinical diagnosis of ALM is essential, but early ALM lesions are often difficult to diagnose because the pigmentation of the lesions sometimes follows the skin marking of the palms and soles, resulting in an asymmetrical appearance and an irregular border in both ALM and benign melanocytic nevus. To overcome this difficulty, dermoscopy was introduced, and determination of the patterns by this method is essential for accurate clinical diagnosis of ALM. Although recent clinical trials have demonstrated that immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors showed significantly improved overall survival of patients with advanced melanoma, ALM may be less susceptible to immune checkpoint inhibitors because of the poor immune response to the tumor. Therefore, strategies for enhancing the immune response to the tumor cells may be required when we apply immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced ALM. In this context, imiquimod, dacarbazine, or interferon are possible therapies that may enhance the effectiveness of the immune checkpoint inhibitors. In addition to being known to have poor immunogenicity, ALM is also known to have infrequent BRAF mutation. Therefore, the majority of ALM patients may not benefit from therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. However, some ALMs have mutations such as KIT and NRAS mutations, and therefore, targeted therapies may improve the survival of ALM patients in the future.

Interdigital Melanoma of the Foot Affecting Two Neighbouring Interdigital Spaces - Second Case Report

Melanoma affecting two interdigital spaces has been recently described by our group for the first time in medical literature. Here we present a second patient with acrolentiginous melanoma of the sole affecting the 1st and 2nd interdigital space. The tumour was removed by delayed Mohs surgery. Due to the extension of the melanoma, digit II and III had to be removed. Staging excluded metastatic spread. The tumour was classified as pT4bN0M0.

Reconstruction Outcomes of Oncologic Foot Defect Using Well-Contoured Free Perforator Flaps

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of foot defects following oncologic resection is a crucial element in the treatment of soft tissue malignancy of the foot.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to comprehensively evaluate outcomes of oncologic foot reconstruction using free perforator flaps.

METHODS

Outcomes of patients with soft tissue malignancy of the foot who underwent reconstruction using a free perforator flap following ablative surgery were reviewed, and perioperative and delayed complications (secondary debulking operation and flap instability) were documented. The Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire was surveyed to assess functional status.

RESULTS

Overall, 72 patients were analyzed, with a median follow-up period of 28 months. Malignant melanoma was a predominant etiology. Three kinds of perforator flaps were used, with the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap being the most common. Flaps with skin dimensions matching the defect size were inset and the thickness of the flaps was controlled with primary defatting. Flap re-exploration was conducted in 11 (15.2%) cases and total flap loss occurred in 3 (4.2%) cases. Delayed complications developed in an additional 12 cases, therefore 23 (31.9%) cases required a return to the operating room. The average FFI score was 8.86 at postoperative month 36, on average (range 11-128 months). All respondents reported being independently ambulatory and had minimal difficulty in their daily lives. Reconstruction of defects on weight-bearing regions showed a significantly higher FFI score than that on nonweight-bearing regions (mean 11.96 vs. 4.79, p = 0.029), although the scores remained very low for both instances.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncologic foot defects can be reliably reconstructed using well-contoured free perforator flaps with minimal functional morbidity.