Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing bevacizumab and interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A feasibility study

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing anti-angiogenic drugs, immunotherapy, or PARP inhibitors for ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. The standard treatment involves chemotherapy with platinum-paclitaxel following cytoreductive surgery. For patients battling widespread and aggressive tumor spread, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery emerges as an encouraging alternative. However, the effectiveness of this strategy is often limited by advanced-stage diagnosis and high likelihood of recurrence. The high mortality rate necessitates the exploration of targeted therapies. Present results signal promising efficacy and acceptable toxicities of anti-angiogenic drugs, immunotherapy, or PARP inhibitors used in chemotherapy. However, the potential integration of these drugs into NACT raises questions about response rates, surgical outcomes, and adverse events. This review delves into the findings from all published articles and ongoing studies, aiming to summarize the clinical use of anti-angiogenic drugs, immunotherapy, or PARP inhibitors in NACT, highlight the positive and negative aspects, and outline future perspectives.

Neoadjuvant treatment in ovarian cancer: New perspectives, new challenges

Ovarian cancer remains the leading cause of death from gynecological cancer. Survival is significantly related to the stage of the disease at diagnosis. Of quite importance is primary cytoreductive surgery, having as a goal to remove all visible tumor tissue, and is the standard primary treatment in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been implemented mostly in treating advanced disease, with studies performed having numerous limitations. Data extrapolated from these studies have not shown inferiority survival of NACT, compared to primary debulking surgery. The role of NACT is of particular interest because of the intrinsic mechanisms that are involved in the process, which can be proven as therapeutic approaches with enormous potential. NACT increases immune infiltration and programmed death ligand-1 (PDL-1) expression, induces local immune activation, and can potentiate the immunogenicity of immune-exclude high grade serous ovarian tumors, while the combination of NACT with bevacizumab, PARP inhibitors or immunotherapy remains to be evaluated. This article summarizes all available data on studies implementing NACT in the treatment of ovarian cancer, focusing on clinical outcomes and study limitations. High mortality rates observed among ovarian cancer patients necessitates the identification of more effective treatments, along with biomarkers that will aid treatment individualization.

Incidence of gastrointestinal perforation associated with bevacizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer: analysis of a Japanese healthcare claims database

Objective

To assess the incidence of bevacizumab-associated gastrointestinal (GI) perforation during first-line treatment of patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in Japanese real-world clinical practice.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted using a healthcare claims database owned by Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. (study period, 2008–2020). Patients who initiated first-line treatment of ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer were identified and divided into NAC and primary debulking surgery (PDS) groups. The incidence of bevacizumab-associated GI perforation was compared within the NAC group and between the groups.

Results

Paclitaxel + carboplatin (TC) was most commonly used as first-line treatment (39.5% and 59.6% in the NAC and PDS groups, respectively). TC + bevacizumab was used in 9.3% and 11.6% of patients in the NAC and PDS groups, respectively. In the NAC group receiving TC, the proportion of patients with risk factors for GI perforation was lower among patients with versus without concomitant bevacizumab. The incidence of GI perforation in the NAC group was 0.38% (1/266 patients) in patients receiving TC + bevacizumab and 0.18% (2/1,131 patients) in patients receiving TC without bevacizumab (risk ratio=2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.19 to 23.36; risk difference=0.20; 95% CI=−0.58 to 0.97). None of the 319 patients in the PDS group receiving TC + bevacizumab had GI perforation.

Conclusion

No notable increase was observed in GI perforation associated with NAC containing bevacizumab. We conclude that bevacizumab is prescribed with sufficient care in Japan to avoid GI perforation.

We assessed gastrointestinal (GI) perforation in patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer. There was no notable association between bevacizumab use and GI perforation in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Our results suggest careful patient selection when prescribing bevacizumab in Japanese real-world clinical practice.

Prospective feasibility study of neoadjuvant dose-dense paclitaxel plus carboplatin with bevacizumab therapy followed by interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefit of dose-dense paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) with bevacizumab therapy for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer patients in the neoadjuvant setting.

METHODS

Ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer patients with stage III-IV disease received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) every 3 weeks consisting of paclitaxel (80 mg/m²) on days 1, 8, and 15; carboplatin (AUC 6.0 mg/mL × min.) on day 1; and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1. Interval debulking surgery (IDS) was performed after 3 cycles of dose-dense TC-bevacizumab therapy. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete resection by IDS. Secondary endpoints were treatment completion rate, treatment exposure, response rate to NAC, adverse events, and perioperative complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were included in this study. The median age was 55.5 years (37-80 years), and most patients had high-grade serous carcinoma accounted (n = 18). IDS was performed in all patients with complete resection achieved in 75% (95% confidence interval: 57.7-92.3%). The lower limit exceeded the preset threshold rate of 55%. The response rate to NAC was 79%, and serum CA125 levels were in the normal range after NAC in 57% of patients. Grade 4 hematological toxicities and grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities occurred in 29% and 17% of patients during NAC, respectively. Grade 3/4 perioperative complications were seen in 29% of patients, but no gastrointestinal perforations or treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant dose-dense TC-bevacizumab therapy was well tolerated, and a satisfactory rate of complete resection by IDS was achieved.

Primary treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: how does the 'real world' practice?

Aims: This study evaluated primary treatment modalities in advanced ovarian cancer according to sociodemographic characteristics and characterized chemotherapy regimens used. Methods: This was a retrospective study of newly diagnosed advanced ovarian, tubal or peritoneal cancer patients at two hospitals from 2011 to 2016. Results: Of 175 women, 41% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 59% received primary cytoreductive surgery. Within the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, 23% did not have a surgical consultation prior to initiating treatment. Women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy lived closer to an academic center and more frequently received carboplatin/paclitaxel every 3 weeks. Cytoreductive surgery patients more frequently received intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Conclusion: The authors identified disparities in age, insurance, distance from treatment center and chemotherapy choice in the primary treatment for ovarian cancer.

Indications and practice of diverting ileostomy after colorectal resection and anastomosis in ovarian cancer cytoreduction

OBJECTIVE

To determine the factors related with diverting ileostomy performance after colorectal resection and anastomosis, in advanced ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery.

METHODS

We have previously demonstrated the risk factors associated with anastomotic leak after colorectal anastomosis: Advanced age at surgery, low serum albumin level, additional bowel resections, manual anastomosis and distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge. However, use of diverting ileostomy is strongly variable and depends on individual surgeon preferences and training. Eight hospitals participated in this retrospective study. Data of 695 patients operated for ovarian cancer with primary colorectal anastomosis were included (January 2010-June 2018). Fourteen pre-/intraoperatively defined variables were identified and analysed as justification factors for use of diverting ileostomy.

RESULTS

The rate of diverting ileostomy in the entire cohort was 19.13% (133/695; range within individual centers 4.6-24.32%). Previous treatment with bevacizumab [OR 2.8 (1.3-6.1); p=0.01]; additional bowel resections [OR 3.0 (1.8-5.1); p<0.001]; extended operating time [OR 1.005 (1.003-1.006); p<0.001] and intra-operative red blood transfusion [OR 2.7 (1.4-5.3); p<0.001] were found to be independently associated with diverting ileostomy performance. Assuming a 7% AL rate cut-off, up to 51.8% of DI presented an AL risk below 7% and might have been spared.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk factors that drive the gynecologic oncology surgeons to perform a diverting ileostomy, seem to differ from the actual risk factors that we have identified to be associated with postoperative anastomotic leak. Broader awareness of the risk factors that contribute to a higher perioperative risk profile, will facilitate a better risk stratification process and possibly avoid unnecessary stoma formation in ovarian cancer patients.

Dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin vs. conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers.

METHODS

A clinical information survey involving 171 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer was conducted. These patients underwent NAC followed by interval debulking surgery at the Hyogo Cancer Center (Hyogo, Japan) between January 2006 and December 2015.

RESULTS

The median observation period was 41 (range 4-138) months. Dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) was administered in 101 patients (59%); tri-weekly TC was administered 70 patients (41%). Median progression-free survival was 21 [95% confidence interval (CI) 18-23] months and 15 (95% CI 13-17) months in the dose-dense TC and conventional-TC group [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.69, 95% CI 0.46-0.96; p = 0.02], respectively. The median overall survival was 59 (95% CI 46-72) and 40 (95% CI 32-57) months in the dose-dense TC group and conventional-TC group (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.48-1.06; p = 0.09). Multivariate analysis for progression-free survival demonstrated that dose-dense TC represented an independent prognostic factor (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.99; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Dose-dense TC is a promising regimen of NAC for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.