1
|
Lago V, Fotopoulou C, Chiantera V, Minig L, Gil-Moreno A, Cascales-Campos PA, Jurado M, Tejerizo A, Padilla-Iserte P, Malune ME, Di Donna MC, Marina T, Sanchez-Iglesias JL, Chiva L, Olloqui A, Matute L, García-Granero A, Cárdenas-Rebollo JM, Domingo S. Indications and practice of diverting ileostomy after colorectal resection and anastomosis in ovarian cancer cytoreduction. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 158:603-607. [PMID: 32571682 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the factors related with diverting ileostomy performance after colorectal resection and anastomosis, in advanced ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery. METHODS We have previously demonstrated the risk factors associated with anastomotic leak after colorectal anastomosis: Advanced age at surgery, low serum albumin level, additional bowel resections, manual anastomosis and distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge. However, use of diverting ileostomy is strongly variable and depends on individual surgeon preferences and training. Eight hospitals participated in this retrospective study. Data of 695 patients operated for ovarian cancer with primary colorectal anastomosis were included (January 2010-June 2018). Fourteen pre-/intraoperatively defined variables were identified and analysed as justification factors for use of diverting ileostomy. RESULTS The rate of diverting ileostomy in the entire cohort was 19.13% (133/695; range within individual centers 4.6-24.32%). Previous treatment with bevacizumab [OR 2.8 (1.3-6.1); p=0.01]; additional bowel resections [OR 3.0 (1.8-5.1); p<0.001]; extended operating time [OR 1.005 (1.003-1.006); p<0.001] and intra-operative red blood transfusion [OR 2.7 (1.4-5.3); p<0.001] were found to be independently associated with diverting ileostomy performance. Assuming a 7% AL rate cut-off, up to 51.8% of DI presented an AL risk below 7% and might have been spared. CONCLUSIONS The risk factors that drive the gynecologic oncology surgeons to perform a diverting ileostomy, seem to differ from the actual risk factors that we have identified to be associated with postoperative anastomotic leak. Broader awareness of the risk factors that contribute to a higher perioperative risk profile, will facilitate a better risk stratification process and possibly avoid unnecessary stoma formation in ovarian cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Lago
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
| | - C Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - V Chiantera
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - L Minig
- Department of Gynecology, CEU Cardenal Herrera University, Valencia, Spain
| | - A Gil-Moreno
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P A Cascales-Campos
- Department of General Surgery, Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinic and University Hospital, Murcia, Spain
| | - M Jurado
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinic of Navarra, Madrid and Navarre, Spain
| | - A Tejerizo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Padilla-Iserte
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - M E Malune
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - M C Di Donna
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - T Marina
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - J L Sanchez-Iglesias
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Chiva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinic of Navarra, Madrid and Navarre, Spain
| | - A Olloqui
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - L Matute
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - A García-Granero
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; Department of Human Embryology and Anatomy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - J M Cárdenas-Rebollo
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, CEU San Pablo University, Madrid, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Domingo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lago V, Fotopoulou C, Chiantera V, Minig L, Gil-Moreno A, Cascales-Campos PA, Jurado M, Tejerizo A, Padilla-Iserte P, Malune ME, Di Donna MC, Marina T, Sánchez-Iglesias JL, Olloqui A, García-Granero Á, Matute L, Fornes V, Domingo S. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection in ovarian cancer surgery: A multi-centre study. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 153:549-554. [PMID: 30952369 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine pre-/intraoperative risk factors for anastomotic leak after modified posterior pelvic exenteration (MPE) or colorectal resection in ovarian cancer and to create a practical instrument for predicting anastomotic leak risk. BACKGROUND In advanced ovarian cancer surgery, there is rather limited published evidence, drawn from a small sample, providing information about risk factors for anastomotic leak. METHODS Eight hospitals participated in this retrospective study. Data on 695 patients operated for ovarian cancer with primary anastomosis were included (January 2010-June 2018). Twelve pre-/intraoperative variables were analysed as potential independent risk factors for anastomotic leak. A predictive model was created to stablish the risk of anastomotic leak for a given patient. RESULTS The anastomotic leak rate was 6.6% (46/695; range 1.7%-12.5%). A total of 457 patients were included in the final multivariate analysis. The following variables were found to be independently associated with anastomotic leakage: age at surgery (OR 1.046, 95% CI 1.013-1.080, p = 0.005), serum albumin level (OR 0.621, 95% CI 0.407-0.948, p = 0.027), one or more additional small bowel resections (OR 3.544, 95% CI 1.228-10.23, p = 0.019), manual anastomosis (OR 8.356, 95% CI 1.777-39.301, p = 0.007) and distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge (OR 0.839, 95% CI 0.726-0.971, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS Due to the low incidence of AL in ovarian cancer patients, a restrictive stoma policy based on the presence of risk factors should be the actual recommendation. Hand-sewn anastomosis should be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Lago
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
| | - C Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - V Chiantera
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - L Minig
- Department of Gynecology, CEU Cardenal Herrera University, Valencia, Spain
| | - A Gil-Moreno
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P A Cascales-Campos
- Department of General Surgery, Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinic and University Hospital, Murcia, Spain
| | - M Jurado
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinic of Navarra, Navarre, Spain
| | - A Tejerizo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Padilla-Iserte
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - M E Malune
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - M C Di Donna
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - T Marina
- Department of Gynecology, Valencian Institute of Oncology, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - A Olloqui
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Á García-Granero
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - L Matute
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - V Fornes
- Unit of Biostatistics, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Domingo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Minig L, Cabrera S, Oliver R, Couso A, Rubio MJ, Iacoponi S, Martin-Salamanca MB, Carballo-Rastrilla S, Cádenas-Rebollo JM, García-Garcia A, Gil-Ibáñez B, Juan-Fita MJ, Patrono MG. Pathology findings and clinical outcomes after risk reduction salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: a multicenter Spanish study. Clin Transl Oncol 2018; 20:1337-1344. [DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1865-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
4
|
Romero I, Rubio M, Serrano R, Medina M, Minig L, Casado A, Coronado P, Martínez S, Orbegoso C, Fusté P, Alia EG, Sánchez-Martínez M, Rubio D, Santacana M, Ruiz M, Llombart-Cussac A, Matias-Guiu X, Poveda A. Preoperative olaparib in early-stage endometrial cancer (EC): A phase 0, window of opportunity trial to evaluate the PARP inhibition effect, targeting cell cycle-related proteins (POLEN study). Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw374.50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
5
|
Minig L, Zanagnolo V, Cárdenas-Rebollo J, Colombo N, Maggioni A. Feasibility of robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:1372-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.04.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2015] [Revised: 03/03/2016] [Accepted: 04/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
|
6
|
Minig L, Colombo N, Zanagnolo V, Aletti G, Landoni F, Bocciolone L, Garbi A, Festi A, Cárdenas-Rebollo M, Maggioni A. Aggressive surgical debulking at time of primary and interval surgery at referral oncologic center: Surgical and oncological outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
7
|
Sideri M, Minig L, Franchi D, Casadio C, Boveri S, Bocciolone L. Reply to Should diagnostic laparoscopy be conducted before hormonal treatment in early-stage endometrial cancer? Ann Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
8
|
Minig L, Franchi D, Boveri S, Casadio C, Bocciolone L, Sideri M. Progestin intrauterine device and GnRH analogue for uterus-sparing treatment of endometrial precancers and well-differentiated early endometrial carcinoma in young women. Ann Oncol 2011; 22:643-649. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
9
|
|
10
|
Minig L, Biffi R, Zanagnolo V, Attanasio A, Beltrami C, Bocciolone L, Botteri E, Colombo N, Iodice S, Landoni F, Peiretti M, Roviglione G, Maggioni A. Early Oral Versus “Traditional” Postoperative Feeding in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Intestinal Resection: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16:1660-8. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0444-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2009] [Revised: 03/01/2009] [Accepted: 03/01/2009] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
11
|
Minig L, Farnetano G, Peiretti M, Roviglione G, Zanagnolo V, Pelosi G, Landoni F. Poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma of the vagina: a case report and a clinical literature review. Ecancermedicalscience 2008; 2:99. [PMID: 22275979 PMCID: PMC3234049 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2008.99] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2008] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Synovial sarcomas (SS) account for 5–10% of soft-tissue sarcomas and typically arise in the para-articular regions of adolescents and young adults. Nonetheless, SS can occasionally occur in other regions of the body. Here, we present a first clinical literature report of a patient with an SS arising from the vaginal wall. A 40-year-old patient who presented a necrotic polypoid lesion, measuring 50 mm and extending from the external urethral meatus to the middle part of the anterior vaginal wall. The biopsy showed a poorly differentiated SS with abundant necrosis and a SYT-SSX1 mutation. A staging CT scan was negative for distant metastases. The patient, prior to the radical surgery, received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ifosfamide and epirubicin) for three cycles. She underwent post-operative external radiotherapy and brachytherapy (50 Gy) due to close margins (<1 mm) in the pathologic specimen. She relapsed 11 and 16 months later with lung metastases, which, both times, were successfully removed by surgical resection. At 24 months from diagnosis, the patient is alive without further evidence of disease. In summary, in the presence of unfavourable prognostic factors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be the primary approach to reduce the tumour size and the risk of distant micro-metastases allowing a less aggressive radical surgery if the tumour is located in a non-extremity site. Hence, a multidisciplinary approach, if not influencing overall survival and disease-free survival, may improve the quality of life. In fact, in our patient we obtained a complete clinical control in the pelvis, avoiding pelvic exenteration with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Minig
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Izbizky GH, Minig L, Sebastiani MA, Otaño L. The effect of early versus delayed postcaesarean feeding on women’s satisfaction: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2008; 115:332-8. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01591.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
13
|
Maggioni A, Bocciolone L, Peiretti M, Landoni F, Zanagnolo V, Minig L, Roviglione G, Colombo N. Robotic modified radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Ecancermedicalscience 2007; 1:55. [PMID: 22275954 PMCID: PMC3223972 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2008.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2007] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Radical hysterectomy, the complete removal of a woman’s uterus, is usually performed via an abdominal incision that requires a 3–5 day hospital stay and a 6–8 week recovery period. Now, in a handful of hospitals around the world, new robotic technology allows doctors to perform this procedure through small incisions that require a recovery time of only one night in the hospital and a significantly shorter recovery period at home. Watch such a procedure being carried out at the European Institute of Oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Maggioni
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|