1
|
Luo YC, Yang TY, Li W, Yu QJ, Xia X, Lin ZY, Chen RD, Cheng L. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted versus open surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:288. [PMID: 39039276 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02046-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with robotic-assisted surgery versus open laparotomy. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies up to June 15, 2024, were identified using PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Additionally, reference lists of included studies, relevant review articles, and clinical guidelines were manually searched. The primary outcomes evaluated were length of stay, 90-day mortality, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), and Post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH). Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, reoperation rate, lymph node yield, and operative time. The final analysis included 10 retrospective cohort studies involving 23,272 patients (2,179 robotic-assisted and 21,093 open surgery). There were no significant differences between the two procedures in terms of postoperative pancreatic fistula, Post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage, lymph node yield, and operative time. However, patients undergoing robotic-assisted surgery had shorter lengths of stay, lower 90-day mortality, and less estimated blood loss compared to those undergoing open surgery. The reoperation rate was higher for the robotic-assisted group. Robotic-assisted surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is safe and feasible. Compared to open surgery, it offers better perioperative and short-term oncologic outcomes, but with a higher risk of reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Chuan Luo
- North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
- Department of General Surgery, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, China
| | - Ting-Yu Yang
- North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
- Department of General Surgery, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, China
| | - Wei Li
- North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Qian-Jun Yu
- Department of General Surgery, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, China
| | - Xin Xia
- Department of General Surgery, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhi-Yu Lin
- Department of General Surgery, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, China
| | - Ru-De Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, China
| | - Long Cheng
- Department of General Surgery, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhun Hong Wong N, Wei Ting Yap D, Lei Ng S, Yu Ning Ng J, James JJ, Wei Chieh Kow A. Oncological outcomes in minimally invasive vs. open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Surg 2024; 11:1369169. [PMID: 38933652 PMCID: PMC11203400 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1369169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Advancements in surgical techniques have improved outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. To date there have been no meta-analyses comparing robotic and laparoscopic approaches for distal pancreatectomies (DP) in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to explore the oncological outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Methods A systematic search was conducted for studies reporting laparoscopic, robotic or open surgery for DP. Frequentist network meta-analysis of oncological outcomes (overall survival, resection margins, tumor recurrence, examined lymph nodes, administration of adjuvant therapy) were performed. Results Fifteen studies totalling 9,301 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. 1,946, 605 and 6,750 patients underwent LDP, RDP and ODP respectively. LDP (HR: 0.761, 95% CI: 0.642-0.901, p = 0.002) and RDP (HR: 0.757, 95% CI: 0.617-0.928, p = 0.008) were associated with overall survival (OS) benefit when compared to ODP. LDP (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.793-1.27, p = 0.968) was not associated with OS benefit when compared to RDP. There were no significant differences between LDP, RDP and ODP for resection margins, tumor recurrence, examined lymph nodes and administration of adjuvant therapy. Conclusion This study highlights the longer OS in both LDP and RDP when compared to ODP for patients with PDAC. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, PROSPERO (CRD42022336417).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicky Zhun Hong Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Dominic Wei Ting Yap
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sherryl Lei Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Junie Yu Ning Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Juanita Jaslin James
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alfred Wei Chieh Kow
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Al Abbas AI, Namazi B, Radi I, Alterio R, Abreu AA, Rail B, Polanco PM, Zeh HJ, Hogg ME, Zureikat AH, Sankaranarayanan G. The development of a deep learning model for automated segmentation of the robotic pancreaticojejunostomy. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2553-2561. [PMID: 38488870 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10725-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery provides an unprecedented opportunity to review video for assessing surgical performance. Surgical video analysis is time-consuming and expensive. Deep learning provides an alternative for analysis. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is a complex and morbid operation. Surgeon technical performance of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) has been associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula. In this work, we aimed to utilize deep learning to automatically segment PJ RPD videos. METHODS This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected videos from 2011 to 2022 that were in libraries at tertiary referral centers, including 111 PJ videos. Each frame of a robotic PJ video was categorized based on 6 tasks. A 3D convolutional neural network was trained for frame-level visual feature extraction and classification. All the videos were manually annotated for the start and end of each task. RESULTS Of the 100 videos assessed, 60 videos were used for the training the model, 10 for hyperparameter optimization, and 30 for the testing of performance. All the frames were extracted (6 frames/second) and annotated. The accuracy and mean per-class F1 scores were 88.01% and 85.34% for tasks. CONCLUSION The deep learning model performed well for automated segmentation of PJ videos. Future work will focus on skills assessment and outcome prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amr I Al Abbas
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9169, USA
| | - Babak Namazi
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9169, USA
| | - Imad Radi
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9169, USA
| | - Rodrigo Alterio
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9169, USA
| | - Andres A Abreu
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9169, USA
| | - Benjamin Rail
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9169, USA
| | - Patricio M Polanco
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9169, USA
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9169, USA
| | | | - Amer H Zureikat
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ganesh Sankaranarayanan
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9169, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Seldomridge AN, Rasic G, Papageorge MV, Ng SC, de Geus SWL, Woods AP, McAneny D, Tseng JF, Sachs TE. Trends in access to minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancers. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:333-343. [PMID: 38087704 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD), including robotic (RPD) and laparoscopy (LPD), is becoming more frequently employed in the management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), though the majority of operations are still performed via open approach (OPD). Access to technologic advances often neglect the underserved. Whether disparities in access to MIPD exist, remain unclear. METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried (2010-2020) for patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for PDAC. Cochran-Armitage tests assessed for trends over time. Social determinants of health (SDH) were compared between approaches. Multinomial logistic models identified predictors of MIPD. RESULTS Of 16,468 patients, 80.03 % underwent OPD and 19.97 % underwent MIPD (22.60 % robotic; 77.40 % laparoscopic). Black race negatively predicted LPD (vs white (OR 0.822; 95 % CI 0.701-0.964)). Predictors of RPD included Medicare/other government insurance (vs uninsured or Medicaid (OR 1.660; 95 % CI 1.123-2.454)) and private insurance (vs uninsured or Medicaid (OR 1.597; 95 % CI 1.090-2.340)). Early (2010-2014) vs late (2015-2020) diagnosis, stratified by race, demonstrated an increase in Non-White patients undergoing OPD (13.15 % vs 14.63 %; p = 0.016), but not LPD (11.41 % vs 13.57 %;p = 0.125) or RPD (14.15 % vs 15.23 %; p = 0.774). CONCLUSION SDH predict surgical approach more than clinical stage, facility type, or comorbidity status. Disparities in race and insurance coverage are different between surgical approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashlee N Seldomridge
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, 85 East Concord Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Gordana Rasic
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, 85 East Concord Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Marianna V Papageorge
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, 85 East Concord Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Sing Chau Ng
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, 85 East Concord Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Susanna W L de Geus
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, 85 East Concord Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Alison P Woods
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - David McAneny
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, 85 East Concord Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Jennifer F Tseng
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, 85 East Concord Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Teviah E Sachs
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, 85 East Concord Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kakati RT, Naffouje S, Spanheimer PM, Dahdaleh FS. Role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:85. [PMID: 38386224 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01825-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a highly lethal malignancy with a minority of patients eligible for curative-intent surgical intervention. Pancreatic resections are technically demanding operations associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPRs), which include laparoscopic and robotic approaches, may enhance postoperative outcomes by lessening physiological impact of open surgery. A limited number of randomized-controlled trials as well as numerous retrospective reports have focused on MIPR outcomes and role in management of a variety of tumors, including PDAC. Today, MIPRs are generally considered acceptable alternatives to open surgery as a trend towards improved short-term metrics is observed. However, several questions remain regarding the oncological adequacy of MIPR's as long-term experience is less extensive compared to open techniques. This review aims to summarize existing evidence on MIPRs with a focus on PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasha T Kakati
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Samer Naffouje
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Philip M Spanheimer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Fadi S Dahdaleh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Edward-Elmhurst Health, 120 Spalding Drive, Ste 205, Naperville, IL, 60540, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nickel F, Studier-Fischer A, Hackert T. [Robotic pancreatic surgery]. CHIRURGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 95:165-174. [PMID: 38095648 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-023-02001-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
Robotic operations as a further development of conventional laparoscopic surgery have been introduced for nearly all interventions in visceral surgery during the last decade. They also currently have a high importance and acceptance in pancreatic surgery despite a relevant learning curve and high associated costs. Standard procedures, such as robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) and partial pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) are most frequently performed, whereas extended resections, e.g., vascular reconstructions of the portal vein, are still limited to a small number of centers worldwide. Potential advantages of robotic pancreatic surgery compared to open surgery include, in particular, less blood loss and a faster postoperative recovery of the patients leading to a shorter hospital stay. Compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, robotic approaches offer advantages with respect to better visualization and three-dimensional dexterity of the instruments; however, the currently published literature comprises only retrospective or prospective observational studies and randomized controlled results are not yet available but first study results in this respect are expected within the next 2-3 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Nickel
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Alexander Studier-Fischer
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hong C, Liu W. Effect of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy on postoperative wound complications in patients with pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J 2024; 21:e14708. [PMID: 38351522 PMCID: PMC10864682 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
At present, it is regarded as a safe and efficient operation to treat terminal pancreatic disease. In this paper, we present a summary of the results of the clinical trials that have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic and open-access pancreatic resection for pancreatic carcinoma of the end of the pancreas. Systematic review of the comparison between laparoscopy and open-access pancreatic resection was conducted. Comparative studies published before October 2023 were included. The selection of the studies was done according to a particular classification and exclusion criterion. A few of our results, which were post-surgery, were associated with injury, were compared. Where appropriate, the reliability of the data has been corroborated by a sensitive analysis. Six trials of 2075 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent distal pancreatic resection to be included in the definitive data analysis. Among them, 447 were treated with open-access surgery and 296 were treated with laparoscope. Six trials showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of postoperative wound infection in patients with pancreas cancer who received a distal pancreatectomy between laparoscopy and open surgery(OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.76-3.61 p = 0.20). Four trials did not reveal any statistically significant differences in the risk of postoperative haemorrhage among patients with pancreas cancer who received a distal pancreatectomy between laparoscopy and open surgery (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 0.54-6.26 p = 0.33). Both trials did not reveal any statistically significant difference in the duration of operation for patients with pancreas cancer who received a distal pancreatectomy between laparoscopy and open surgery (MD, 13.58; 95% CI, -7.31-34.46 p = 0.2). Based on these meta-analyses, the use of laparoscopy or open surgery was not associated with an increase in the risk of postoperative infection or haemorrhage. Furthermore, the duration of the two operations did not differ significantly. These two procedures appear to be a safe and viable choice in the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma. Nevertheless, a randomized, controlled study should be performed to verify the validity of this observation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Hong
- Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical UniversityTaizhouChina
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryEnze Hospital, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group)TaizhouChina
| | - Wei Liu
- Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical UniversityTaizhouChina
- Department of Emergency SurgeryEnze Hospital, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group)TaizhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hays SB, Corvino G, Lorié BD, McMichael WV, Mehdi SA, Rieser C, Rojas AE, Hogg ME. Prince and princesses: The current status of robotic surgery in surgical oncology. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:164-182. [PMID: 38031870 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Robotic surgery has experienced a dramatic increase in utilization across general surgery over the last two decades, including in surgical oncology. Although urologists and gynecologists were the first to show that this technology could be utilized in cancer surgery, the robot is now a powerful tool in the treatment of gastrointestinal, hepato-pancreatico-biliary, colorectal, endocrine, and soft tissue malignancies. While long-term outcomes are still pending, short-term outcomes have showed promise for this technologic advancement of cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah B Hays
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Gaetano Corvino
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Benjamin D Lorié
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - William V McMichael
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Syed A Mehdi
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Caroline Rieser
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Aram E Rojas
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Palacio J, Sanchez D, Samuels S, Ainuz BY, Vigue RM, Hernandez WE, Gannon CJ, Llaguna OH. Impact of conversion at time of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy on perioperative and long-term outcomes: Review of the National Cancer Database. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2023; 27:292-300. [PMID: 37088999 PMCID: PMC10472115 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.22-101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Current literature presents limited data regarding outcomes following conversion at the time of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MI-PD). Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Patients were stratified into three groups: MI-PD, converted to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (CO-PD), and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (O-PD). Multivariable modeling was applied to compare outcomes of MI-PD and CO-PD to those of O-PD. Results Of 17,570 patients identified, 12.5%, 4.2%, and 83.4% underwent MI-PD, CO-PD, and O-PD, respectively. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (R-PD) resulted in a higher lymph node yield (n = 23.2 ± 12.2) even when requiring conversion (n = 22.4 ± 13.2, p < 0.001). Margin positivity was higher in the CO-PD group (26.6%) than in the MI-PD group (21.3%) and the O-PD (22.6%) group (p = 0.017). Length of stay was shorter in the MI-PD group (laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy 10.4 ± 8.6, R-PD 10.6 ± 8.8) and the robotic converted to open group (10.7 ± 6.4) than in the laparoscopic converted to open group (11.2 ± 9) and the O-PD group (11.5 ± 8.9) (p < 0.001). After adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics, both MI-PD (odds ratio = 1.40; p < 0.001) and CO-PD (odds ratio = 1.24; p = 0.020) were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of long-term survival. Conclusions CO-PD does not negatively impact perioperative or oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Palacio
- Department of General Surgery, Memorial Healthcare System, Hollywood, FL, United States
| | - Daisy Sanchez
- Department of General Surgery, Memorial Healthcare System, Hollywood, FL, United States
| | - Shenae Samuels
- Office of Human Research, Memorial Healthcare System, Hollywood, FL, United States
| | - Bar Y. Ainuz
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Raelynn M. Vigue
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Waleem E. Hernandez
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Christopher J. Gannon
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Healthcare System, Pembroke Pines, FL, United States
| | - Omar H. Llaguna
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Healthcare System, Pembroke Pines, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jabłońska B, Mrowiec S. Pancreatectomy and Pancreatic Surgery. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1400. [PMID: 37374182 DOI: 10.3390/life13061400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatectomy, including pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), as well as central pancreatectomy (CP), distal pancreatectomy (DP) and total/subtotal pancreatectomy, is a major, complex and difficult surgical procedure performed for various benign and malignant pancreatic diseases: from chronic pancreatitis, through benign cystic tumors and neuroendocrine neoplasms to malignant neoplasms, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beata Jabłońska
- Department of Digestive Tract Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland
| | - Sławomir Mrowiec
- Department of Digestive Tract Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Meyyappan T, Wilson GC, Zeh HJ, Hogg ME, Lee KK, Zureikat AH, Paniccia A. Robotic approach mitigates the effect of major complications on survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:1181-1187. [PMID: 36163566 PMCID: PMC11189666 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09638-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major complications (MCs) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are a known independent predictor of worse oncologic outcomes. There are limited data on the effect of major complications on long-term outcomes after robotic PD (RPD). The aim of this study is to compare the effect of MC on overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) after RPD and open PD (OPD). METHODS This is a single-center, retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing PD for periampullary cancer including ampullary adenocarcinoma, distal cholangiocarcinoma, and duodenal carcinoma. Univariate analysis was performed on all clinical, pathologic, and treatment factors. MCs were defined as Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade 3. Kaplan-Maier survival analysis was performed with log-rank test for group comparison. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS) in both the OPD and RPD groups. RESULTS A total of 190 patients with ampullary carcinoma (n = 98), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 55), and duodenal adenocarcinoma (n = 37) were examined over the study period with 61.1% (n = 116) undergoing RPD and 38.9% (n = 74) undergoing OPD. There was no significant difference in patient demographics between the RPD and OPD cohorts. Furthermore, R0 resection rates, tumor size, and lymph node involvement were similar between the RPD and OPD cohorts. OPD had higher rate of MC (40.5% vs 28.3% in RPD, p = 0.011) including clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (25.7% vs 8.6%, p = 0.001) and wound infection (34.5% vs 13.8%, p < 0.001). MCs were associated with a lower OS in the OPD cohort (HR = 2.18, 95%CI 1.0-4.55, p = 0.038). MCs were not associated with OS in the RPD cohort (HR = 1.55, 95%CI 0.87-2.76, p = 0.14). CONCLUSION MCs are associated with worse patient outcomes after OPD but not after RPD. Robotic approach mitigates and possibly abrogates the negative effects of MCs on patient outcomes after PD for malignancy and is associated with improved adjuvant chemotherapy completion rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thiagarajan Meyyappan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3550 Terrace Street, A425 Scaife Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA
| | - Greg C Wilson
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3550 Terrace Street, A425 Scaife Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3550 Terrace Street, A425 Scaife Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3550 Terrace Street, A425 Scaife Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Olakowski M, Jabłońska B, Mrowiec S. A chronicle of the pancreatoduodenectomy technique development - from the surgeon's hand to the robotic arm. Acta Chir Belg 2023; 123:94-101. [PMID: 36250406 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2022.2135251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains one of the most challenging abdominal surgical procedures. METHODS A review of the literature regarding the history of PD, starting from the pioneers, Walter Kausch and Alan Whipple, through the great surgeons of the last century, up to the present day. RESULTS The greatest development of the PD technique took place at the end of the twentieth century. Over the last 40 years, there have been huge technological advances in medicine, which have resulted in the introduction of laparoscopic and robotic techniques for abdominal surgery. However, it turns out that PD is still performed as it used to be "by the surgeon's hand" via laparotomy rather than using the most modern robot or laparoscope and is currently recommended by experts for treatment of pancreatic head cancer (PHC). This is mainly caused by not many data comparing these three PD methods. Moreover, increasingly the results achieved by surgeons advanced in minimally invasive pancreatic resections are comparable to or even better than those achieved by the open method in reference centres. Robot-assisted PD appears to be gaining an advantage over laparoscopic technique in the efficacy of PHC treatment. The obstacles most inhibiting the use of surgical robotics are the high cost of the device and procedure, and the long learning curve. A bright future lies ahead for both methods, with the robotic technique in the forefront. CONCLUSIONS Despite significant advances in access and surgical technique, PD remains a challenging surgical procedure requiring a big surgeon's experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek Olakowski
- Department of Digestive Tract Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Beata Jabłońska
- Department of Digestive Tract Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Sławomir Mrowiec
- Department of Digestive Tract Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Williams MD, Bhama AR, Naffouje S, Kamarajah SK, Becerra AZ, Zhang Y, Pappas SG, Dahdaleh FS. Effect of Operative Time on Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:93-104. [PMID: 36357742 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05504-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate how operative time interacts with outcomes among different approaches to pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Minimally invasive PDs (MIPD), which include laparoscopic (LPD) and robotic (RPD) approaches, are increasingly performed in the USA. MIPD are generally associated with longer operative times (OT) compared to open PD (OPD). Increased OT is associated with inferior outcomes for OPD; however, the effect of OT on MIPD is not well understood. METHODS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)-targeted pancreatectomy dataset was utilized (2014-2019). Propensity score matching, logistic regression, and mixed effect modeling were performed to determine the effect of OT on outcomes following PD. OTs were stratified by quartiles for each approach, and outcomes were subsequently compared. RESULTS Among 23,988 PDs, 22,185 were OPD and 1803 MIPD. Increased OT was associated with greater overall morbidity in all approaches. When comparing OT quartiles, MIPD was consistently associated with improved overall morbidity compared to OPD in matched cohorts. However, for upper quartiles, prolonged OT in MIPD was associated with significantly increased reoperation rates and mortality. The effect of OT on overall morbidity and other outcomes was comparable among LPD and RPD. CONCLUSIONS In this study, increased OT was associated with incremental increases in overall morbidity after PD, irrespective of approach. While MIPD was associated with improved overall morbidity compared to OPD when stratified by OT quartile, higher mortality rates were observed with prolonged OT only with MIPD. Those data suggest that MIPD is a safe alternative to OPD when OT is optimized. NSQIP was used to compare the effect of operative time (OT) on outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), stratified by approach. Increased OT was associated with inferior outcomes following open, laparoscopic, and robotic PD. Surgeons should attempt to optimize OT, regardless of the approach to PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Williams
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Surgery, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Anuradha R Bhama
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Samer Naffouje
- Department of Surgical Oncology, H. Lee Moffit Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Adan Z Becerra
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Yanyu Zhang
- Research Informatics Core, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sam G Pappas
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Fadi S Dahdaleh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Edward-Elmhurst Health, 120 Spalding Drive, Suite 205, Naperville, IL, 60540, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Olakowski M, Grudzińska E. Pancreatic head cancer - Current surgery techniques. Asian J Surg 2023; 46:73-81. [PMID: 35680512 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.05.117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic head cancer is a highly fatal disease. For now, surgery offers the only potential long-term cure albeit with a high risk of complications. However, the progress of surgical technique during the past decade has resulted in 5-year survival approaching 30% after resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. This paper presents current data on the recommended extent of lymphadenectomy, the resection margin, on the definition of resectable and borderline resectable tumors and mesopancreas. Surgical techniques proposed to improve PD are presented: the artery first approach, the uncinate process first, the mesopancreas first approach, the triangle operation, periarterial divestment, and multiorgan resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek Olakowski
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 14, 40-752, Katowice, Poland
| | - Ewa Grudzińska
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 14, 40-752, Katowice, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Esposito A, Ramera M, Casetti L, De Pastena M, Fontana M, Frigerio I, Giardino A, Girelli R, Landoni L, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, Paiella S, Pea A, Regi P, Scopelliti F, Tuveri M, Bassi C, Salvia R, Butturini G. 401 consecutive minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies: lessons learned from 20 years of experience. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7025-7037. [PMID: 35102430 PMCID: PMC9402493 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08997-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to discuss and report the trend, outcomes, and learning curve effect after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) at two high-volume centres. METHODS Patients undergoing MIDP between January 1999 and December 2018 were retrospectively identified from prospectively maintained electronic databases. The entire cohort was divided into two groups constituting the "early" and "recent" phases. The learning curve effect was analyzed for laparoscopic (LDP) and robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP). The follow-up was at least 2 years. RESULTS The study population included 401 consecutive patients (LDP n = 300, RDP n = 101). Twelve surgeons performed MIDP during the study period. Although patients were more carefully selected in the early phase, in terms of median age (49 vs. 55 years, p = 0.026), ASA class higher than 2 (3% vs. 9%, p = 0.018), previous abdominal surgery (10% vs. 34%, p < 0.001), and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (7% vs. 15%, p = 0.017), the recent phase had similar perioperative outcomes. The increase of experience in LDP was inversely associated with the operative time (240 vs 210 min, p < 0.001), morbidity rate (56.5% vs. 40.1%, p = 0.005), intra-abdominal collection (28.3% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.023), and length of stay (8 vs. 7 days, p = 0.009). Median survival in the PDAC subgroup was 53 months. CONCLUSION In the setting of high-volume centres, the surgical training of MIDP is associated with acceptable rates of morbidity. The learning curve can be largely achieved by several team members, improving outcomes over time. Whenever possible resection of PDAC guarantees adequate oncological results and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Esposito
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Ramera
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Casetti
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo De Pastena
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Martina Fontana
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Luca Landoni
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Malleo
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Paiella
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Pea
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Paolo Regi
- Department of Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera, Italy
| | | | - Massimiliano Tuveri
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
- Università di Verona, Verona, Italy.
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zheng J, Paniccia A, Zureikat AH. Advances in the Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer. Surg Pathol Clin 2022; 15:479-490. [PMID: 36049830 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Three recent advances in the surgical approach to pancreatic cancer over the past decade have improved both short- and long-term outcomes for patients with nonmetastatic, operable pancreatic cancer. These include (1) minimally invasive pancreatectomy to reduce operative morbidity while adhering to principles of open oncologic resections, (2) neoadjuvant chemotherapy to treat radiographically occult metastatic disease and improve locoregional control, and (3) applying irreversible electroporation as an adjunct to surgery, allowing a fraction of locally advanced pancreatic cancer to be resected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Zheng
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5150 Centre Avenue, Suite 421, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5150 Centre Avenue, Suite 421, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5150 Centre Avenue, Suite 421, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Naffouje SA, Kamarajah SK, Denbo JW, Salti GI, Dahdaleh FS. Surgical Approach does not Affect Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:7793-7803. [PMID: 35960450 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12347-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD), including laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD and RPD, respectively), on compliance and time to return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with nonmetastatic PDAC were analyzed in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Three groups were matched per propensity score: open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) and MIPD, LPD and RPD, and converted and nonconverted patients. RIOT rates and time to RIOT were examined. RESULTS A total of 14,135 patients were included: 11,834 (83.7%) underwent OPD and 2301 (16.3%) underwent MIPD. After score matching, RIOT rates (67.2 vs. 65.3%; p = 0.112) and RIOT within 8 weeks (57.7 vs. 56.4%; p = 0.276) were similar among MIPD and OPD groups, and approach was not a significant predictor of RIOT on multivariable regression. Neither RIOT nor time to RIOT were different among LPD and RPD groups (63.9 vs. 67.0%, and 58.4 vs. 56.9%, respectively). Compared with LPD, RPD was associated with lower conversion rates (HR 0.519; p < 0.001), and conversion was associated with longer median time to RIOT (10 vs. 8 weeks; p = 0.041). CONCLUSION In this national cohort, approach did not impact RIOT rates or time to RIOT for patients with PDAC. While conversion was associated with longer median time to RIOT, readiness to commence adjuvant therapy was similar for LPD and RPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer A Naffouje
- Department of Surgical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Trust, Newcastle, UK.,Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Jason W Denbo
- GI Oncology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - George I Salti
- Department of General Surgery, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Edward-Elmhurst Health, Naperville, IL, USA
| | - Fadi S Dahdaleh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Edward-Elmhurst Health, Naperville, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Weng Y, Shen Z, Gemenetzis G, Jin J, Chen H, Deng X, Peng C, Shen B. Oncological outcomes of robotic pancreatectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy: A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2022; 104:106801. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
19
|
Bahra M, Ossami Saidy RR. Current status of robotic surgery for hepato-pancreato-biliary malignancies. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2022; 22:939-946. [PMID: 35863758 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2022.2105211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Robotic surgery is an emerging aspect of gastrointestinal surgery. Hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery is currently being explored for a broad spectrum of indications, entities, and postoperative outcomes. Noninferiority and financial aspects are the focus of studies. In this review, the impact on oncological therapies is assessed. AREAS COVERED An extensive literature review was conducted, and relevant studies and articles and reviews for robotic surgery in the field of hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery were examined. Special attention was given to the oncological aspects of robotic surgery and its possible impact on the therapy of malignant neoplasms. EXPERT OPINION Robotic-assisted surgery for oncological indications is promising, in part, an established technique that has already shown its advantages in the last decade, although high-quality studies are missing. Upcoming experience must consider the oncological benefit and putative new indications in a rapidly changing field of anti-neoplastic regimens. Also, robotic surgery may possess the ability to accelerate digitalization and AI-based augmentation in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Bahra
- Krankenhaus Waldfriede, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Charité, Zentrum für Onkologische Oberbauchchirurgie und Robotik, Argentinische Allee 40, 14163 Berlin
| | - Ramin Raul Ossami Saidy
- Krankenhaus Waldfriede, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Charité, Zentrum für Onkologische Oberbauchchirurgie und Robotik, Argentinische Allee 40, 14163 Berlin
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ghotbi J, Sahakyan M, Søreide K, Fretland ÅA, Røsok B, Tholfsen T, Waage A, Edwin B, Labori KJ, Yaqub S, Kleive D. Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: Contemporary Practice, Evidence, and Knowledge Gaps. Oncol Ther 2022; 10:301-315. [PMID: 35829933 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-022-00203-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy has gained popularity throughout the last decade. For laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy, some high-level evidence exists, but with conflicting results. There are currently no published randomized controlled trials comparing robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy. Comparative long-term data for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is lacking to date. Based on the existing evidence, current observed benefits of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy over open pancreatoduodenectomy seem scarce, but retrospective data indicate the safety of these procedures in selected patients. As familiarity with the robotic platform increases, studies have shown an expansion in indications, also including patients with vascular involvement and even indicating favorable results in patients with obesity and high-risk morphometric features. Several ongoing randomized controlled trials aim to investigate potential differences in short- and long-term outcomes between minimally invasive and open pancreatoduodenectomy. Their results are much awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Ghotbi
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mushegh Sahakyan
- The Intervention Center, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Åsmund Avdem Fretland
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Center, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bård Røsok
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tore Tholfsen
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne Waage
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Center, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Jørgen Labori
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sheraz Yaqub
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dyre Kleive
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy: From the First Worldwide Procedure to the Actual State of the Art. CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40137-022-00319-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
22
|
Jin J, Shi Y, Chen M, Qian J, Qin K, Wang Z, Chen W, Jin W, Lu F, Li Z, Wu Z, Jian L, Han B, Liang X, Sun C, Wu Z, Mou Y, Yin X, Huang H, Chen H, Gemenetzis G, Deng X, Peng C, Shen B. Robotic versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors (PORTAL): a study protocol for a multicenter phase III non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:954. [PMID: 34961558 PMCID: PMC8711152 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05939-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatoduodenectomy is a complex and challenging procedure that requires meticulous tissue dissection and proficient suturing skills. Minimally invasive surgery with the utilization of robotic platforms has demonstrated advantages in perioperative patient outcomes in retrospective studies. The development of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) in specific has progressed significantly, since first reported in 2003, and high-volume centers in pancreatic surgery are reporting large patient series with improved pain management and reduced length of stay. However, prospective studies to assess objectively the feasibility and safety of RPD compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) are currently lacking. METHODS/DESIGN The PORTAL trial is a multicenter randomized controlled, patient-blinded, parallel-group, phase III non-inferiority trial performed in seven high-volume centers for pancreatic and robotic surgery in China (> 20 RPD and > 100 OPD annually in each participating center). The trial is designed to enroll and randomly assign 244 patients with an indication for elective pancreatoduodenectomy for malignant periampullary and pancreatic lesions, as well as premalignant and symptomatic benign periampullary and pancreatic disease. The primary outcome is time to functional recovery postoperatively, measured in days. Secondary outcomes include postoperative morbidity and mortality, as well as perioperative costs. A sub-cohort of 128 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) will also be compared to assess the percentage of patients who undergo postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy within 8 weeks, in each arm. Secondary outcomes in this cohort will include patterns of disease recurrence, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival. DISCUSSION The PORTAL trial is designed to assess the feasibility and safety of RPD compared to OPD, in terms of functional recovery as described previously. Additionally, this trial will explore whether RPD allows increased access to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, in a sub-cohort of patients with PDAC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04400357 . Registered on May 22, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiabin Jin
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yusheng Shi
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengmin Chen
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianfeng Qian
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Kai Qin
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shanxi Province, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Pancreaticobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Weiwei Jin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Fengchun Lu
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Zheyong Li
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Zehua Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
| | - Li Jian
- Clinical Research Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Bing Han
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Chuandong Sun
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
| | - Zheng Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shanxi Province, China
| | - Yiping Mou
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xiaoyu Yin
- Department of Pancreaticobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Heguang Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Hao Chen
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Georgios Gemenetzis
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
- Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
| | - Xiaxing Deng
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Chenghong Peng
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Baiyong Shen
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kim HS, Kim H, Han Y, Lee M, Kang YH, Sohn HJ, Kang JS, Kwon W, Jang JY. ROBOT-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy in 300 consecutive cases: Annual trend analysis and propensity score-matched comparison of perioperative and long-term oncologic outcomes with the open method. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2021; 29:301-310. [PMID: 34689430 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE We previously reported perioperative and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (RAPD); however, the follow-up period in RAPD was relatively short, and disease-matched survival analyses were lacking. Therefore, this study investigated time trends of perioperative and long-term disease-matched outcomes of RAPD. METHODS Annual clinicopathologic outcomes of 328 patients with RAPD between 2015 and 2020 were analyzed and compared with 929 patients with open PD using the propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis based on postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) risk and oncologic variables in malignant patients. RESULTS Robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy cases increased from 10 (6.3%) in 2015 to 116 (50.2% of total PD) in 2020, with malignancy proportion increasing from 50.0% to 80.2%. POPF risk-based PSM analysis showed that compared with open PD, RAPD had younger patients (63.7 vs 65.6 years, P = .018), longer operation time (339.1 vs 290.0 min, P < .001); however, estimated blood loss (P = .275), complications (17.1% vs 18.3%, P = .702), and clinically relevant POPF (9.8% vs 11.1%, P = .584) were similar with shorter postoperative hospital stay (10.8 vs 15.6 days, P < .001). In disease and stage-matched malignant patients, R0 resection (93.9% vs 91.2%, P = .376), total retrieved lymph node (18.2 vs 19.9, P = .058), and 5-year survival rate (57.3% vs 60.6%, P = .406) were similar between RAPD and open PD, also in pancreatic cancer patients (31.6% vs 26.3%, P = .068). CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy demonstrated similar perioperative outcomes with earlier recovery and equivalent long-term survival with open PD. RAPD is safe and feasible for periampullary lesions, including pancreatic cancers, and its role will expand in the era of minimally invasive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeong Seok Kim
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hongbeom Kim
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youngmin Han
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mirang Lee
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon Hyung Kang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Ju Sohn
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Seung Kang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nassour I, Paniccia A, Moser AJ, Zureikat AH. Minimally Invasive Techniques for Pancreatic Resection. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021; 30:747-758. [PMID: 34511194 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
There is increasing interest in the role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for pancreatectomy. Prospective data indicate significant advantages for MIS when performed for left-sided pancreatic pathologies and may be deemed as the standard of care. However, there is reluctance in implementing this technique to pancreaticoduodenectomy because of the complexity of the operation and the mixed results from randomized trials. A detailed description of the technical aspects of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy is presented in this article in addition to a summary of the most important prospective and cohort studies. We also provide insights into patient selection and the learning curve of MIS surgery for pancreatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Nassour
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - A James Moser
- Harvard Medical School, Pancreas and Liver Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5150 Center Avenue, Suite 421, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Khachfe HH, Habib JR, Chahrour MA, Nassour I. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: Where do we stand? Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 2:103-109. [DOI: 10.37126/aige.v2.i4.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex operation accompanied by significant morbidity rates. Due to this complexity, the transition to minimally invasive PD has lagged behind other abdominal surgical operations. The safety, feasibility, favorable post-operative outcomes of robotic PD have been suggested by multiple studies. Compared to open surgery and other minimally invasive techniques such as laparoscopy, robotic PD offers satisfactory outcomes, with a non-inferior risk of adverse events. Trends of robotic PD have been on rise with centers substantially increasing the number the operation performed. Although promising, findings on robotic PD need to be corroborated in prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hussein H Khachfe
- Surgery Department, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States
| | - Joseph R Habib
- Surgery Department, Johns Hopkins University, Balitmore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Mohamad A Chahrour
- Surgery Department, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, United States
| | - Ibrahim Nassour
- Surgery Department, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Aziz H, Khan M, Khan S, Serra GP, Goodman MD, Genyk Y, Sheikh MR. Assessing the perioperative complications and outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy using the National Cancer Database: is it ready for prime time? J Robot Surg 2021; 16:687-694. [PMID: 34398365 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01296-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy has generated significant interest in recent years. Our study aimed to evaluate the difference in surgical, oncological, and survival outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) by either a robotic (RPD) or open approach (OPD). Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients from 2010 and 2017 diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy by either robotic PD or open approach. Patients who underwent robotic PD during 2010 were compared to patients receiving the same procedure in 2017. In addition, a secondary analysis was performed to assess outcomes of robotic PD to open PD for the 2017 patient cohorts. Our primary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day mortality, length of stay, as well as 30-day readmission. Secondary outcome measures were surgical margins, lymph node yield, and adjuvant chemotherapy initiation within 12 weeks of surgery. When we compared the 2017 data to 2010 data, we found that robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy had lower 30- and 90-day mortality rates in 2017 compared to 2010. Additionally, we found that the lymph node yield in robotic PD increased during the study period. When we compared robotic PD to open PD for 2017, we found no statistically significant differences in readmission rates (10.1% vs. 9.7%: p-0.4), lymph node yield, or negative margin between the groups. Outcomes of robotic PD have improved over the years. In 2017, outcomes of robotic PD were similar to open PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Aziz
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Muhammad Khan
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Sara Khan
- Department of Surgery, St. David's Health Care System, Austin, TX, USA
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | | | - Martin D Goodman
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yuri Genyk
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Mohd Raashid Sheikh
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Khachfe HH, Habib JR, Harthi SA, Suhool A, Hallal AH, Jamali FR. Robotic pancreas surgery: an overview of history and update on technique, outcomes, and financials. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:483-494. [PMID: 34357526 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01289-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The use robotics in surgery is gaining momentum. This approach holds substantial promise in pancreas surgery. Robotic surgery for pancreatic lesions and malignancies has become well accepted and is expanding to more and more center annually. The number of centers using robotics in pancreatic surgery is rapidly increasing. The most studied robotic pancreas surgeries are pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy. Most studies are in their early phases, but they report that robotic pancreas surgery is safe feasible. Robotic pancreas surgery offers several advantages over open and laparoscopic techniques. Data regarding costs of robotics versus conventional techniques is still lacking. Robotic pancreas surgery is still in its early stages. It holds promise to become the new surgical standard for pancreatic resections in the future, however, more research is still needed to establish its safety, cost effectiveness and efficacy in providing the best outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hussein H Khachfe
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. .,Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UPMC Pancreatic Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Joseph R Habib
- Division of General Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Salem Al Harthi
- Department of Surgery, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Amal Suhool
- Department of Surgery, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Ali H Hallal
- Department of Surgery, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Faek R Jamali
- Department of Surgery, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Current status of minimally invasive surgery for pancreatic cancer. LAPAROSCOPIC, ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2021.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
29
|
Nakata K, Nakamura M. The current status and future directions of robotic pancreatectomy. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:467-476. [PMID: 34337295 PMCID: PMC8316739 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Robotic surgery has emerged as an alternative to laparoscopic surgery and it has also been applied to pancreatectomy. With the increase in the number of robotic pancreatectomies, several studies comparing robotic pancreatectomy and conventional open or laparoscopic pancreatectomy have been published. However, the use of robotic pancreatectomy remains controversial. In this review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current status of robotic pancreatectomy. Various aspects of robotic pancreatectomy and conventional open or laparoscopic pancreatectomy are compared, including the benefits, limitations, oncological efficacy, learning curves, and costs. Both robotic pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy have favorable or comparable outcomes to conventional procedures, and robotic pancreatectomy has the potential to be an alternative to open or laparoscopic procedures. However, there are still several disadvantages to robotic platforms, such as prolonged operative duration and the high cost of the procedure. These disadvantages will be improved by developing instruments, overcoming the learning curve, and increasing the number of robotic pancreatectomies. In addition, robotic pancreatectomy is still in the introductory period in most centers and should only be used in accordance with strict indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kohei Nakata
- Department of Surgery and OncologyGraduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Masafumi Nakamura
- Department of Surgery and OncologyGraduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Current evidence shows that robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) is feasible with a safety profile equivalent to either open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) or laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD). However, major intraoperative bleeding can occur and emergency conversion to OPD may be required. RPD reduces the risk of emergency conversion when compared to LPD. The learning curve of RPD ranges from 20 to 40 procedures, but proficiency is reached only after 250 operations. Once proficiency is achieved, the results of RPD may be superior to those of OPD. As for now, RPD is at least equivalent to OPD and LPD with respect to incidence and severity of POPF, incidence and severity of post-operative complications, and post-operative mortality. A minimal annual number of 20 procedures per center is recommended. In pancreatic cancer (versus OPD), RPD is associated with similar rates of R0 resections, but higher number of examined lymph nodes, lower blood loss, and lower need of blood transfusions. Multivariable analysis shows that RPD could improve patient survival. Data from selected centers show that vein resection and reconstruction is feasible during RPD, but at the price of high conversion rates and frequent use of small tangential resections. The true Achilles heel of RPD is higher operative costs that limit wider implementation of the procedure and accumulation of a large experience at most single centers. In conclusion, when proficiency is achieved, RPD may be superior to OPD with respect to CR-POPF and oncologic outcomes. Achievement of proficiency requires commitment, dedication, and truly high volumes.
Collapse
|
31
|
Serra F, Bonaduce I, De Ruvo N, Cautero N, Gelmini R. Short-term and long term morbidity in robotic pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Gland Surg 2021; 10:1767-1779. [PMID: 34164320 DOI: 10.21037/gs-21-64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive and lethal tumours in Western society. Pancreatic surgery can be considered a challenge for open and laparoscopic surgeons, even if the accuracy of gland dissection, due to the close relationship between pancreas, the portal vein, and mesenteric vessels, besides the reconstructive phase (in pancreaticoduodenectomy), lead to significant difficulties for laparoscopic technique. Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery changed utterly with the development of robotic surgery. However, this review aims to make more clarity on the influence of robotic surgery on long-term morbidity. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus to identify and analyze studies published from November 2011 to September 2020 concerning robotic pancreatic surgery. The following terms were used to perform the search: "long term morbidity robotic pancreatic surgery". Results Eighteen articles included in the study were published between November 2011 and September 2020. The review included 2041 patients who underwent robotic pancreatic surgery, mainly for a malignant tumour. The two most common robotic surgical procedures adopted were the robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) and the robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). In two studies, patients were divided into groups; on the one hand, those who underwent a robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD), on the other hand, those who underwent robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP). The remaining items included surgical approach such as robotic middle pancreatectomy (RMP), robotic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy, robotic-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic dissection (RALPD), robotic enucleation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Conclusions Comparison between robotic surgery and open surgery lead to evidence of different advantages of the robotic approach. A multidisciplinary team and a surgical centre at high volume are essential for better postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Serra
- Department of Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - Policlinico of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Isabella Bonaduce
- Department of Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - Policlinico of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola De Ruvo
- Department of Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - Policlinico of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola Cautero
- Department of Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - Policlinico of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberta Gelmini
- Department of Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - Policlinico of Modena, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chen K, Pan Y, Huang CJ, Chen QL, Zhang RC, Zhang MZ, Wang GY, Wang XF, Mou YP, Yan JF. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma: separate propensity score matching analyses of distal pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:382. [PMID: 33836678 PMCID: PMC8034161 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08117-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading causes of cancer mortality worldwide. Currently, laparoscopic pancreatic resection (LPR) is extensively applied to treat benign and low-grade diseases related to the pancreas. The viability and safety of LPR for PDAC needs to be understood better. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) are the two main surgical approaches for PDAC. We performed separate propensity score matching (PSM) analyses to assess the surgical and oncological outcomes of LPR for PDAC by comparing LDP with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) as well as LPD with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). METHODS We assessed the data of patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy (DP) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for PDAC between January 2004 and February 2020 at our hospital. A one-to-one PSM was applied to prevent selection bias by accounting for factors such as age, sex, body mass index, and tumour size. The DP group included 86 LDP patients and 86 ODP patients, whereas the PD group included 101 LPD patients and 101 OPD patients. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative effects, postoperative recovery, and survival outcomes were compared. RESULTS Compared to ODP, LDP was associated with shorter operative time, lesser blood loss, and similar overall morbidity. Of the 101 patients who underwent LPD, 10 patients (9.9%) required conversion to laparotomy. The short-term surgical advantage of LPD is not as apparent as that of LDP due to conversions. Compared with OPD, LPD was associated with longer operative time, lesser blood loss, and similar overall morbidity. For oncological and survival outcomes, there were no significant differences in tumour size, R0 resection rate, and tumour stage in both the DP and PD subgroups. However, laparoscopic procedures appear to have an advantage over open surgery in terms of retrieved lymph nodes (DP subgroup: 14.4 ± 5.2 vs. 11.7 ± 5.1, p = 0.03; PD subgroup 21.9 ± 6.6 vs. 18.9 ± 5.4, p = 0.07). These two groups did not show a significant difference in the pattern of recurrence and overall survival rate. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic DP and PD are feasible and oncologically safe procedures for PDAC, with similar postoperative outcomes and long-term survival among patients who underwent open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke Chen
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yu Pan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Chao-Jie Huang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Qi-Long Chen
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Ren-Chao Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Miao-Zun Zhang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center, Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, 315100, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Guan-Yu Wang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xian-Fa Wang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yi-Ping Mou
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jia-Fei Yan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hrebinko K, Tohme S, Hoehn RS, AlMasri S, Khan S, Kaltenmeier C, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Zureikat A, Nassour I. A National Assessment of Optimal Oncologic Surgery for Distal Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas. Pancreas 2021; 50:386-392. [PMID: 33835970 PMCID: PMC8670387 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to create a composite measure, optimal oncologic surgery (OOS), for patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and identify factors associated with OOS. METHODS Adult patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy were identified from the National Cancer Database between 2010 and 2016. Patients were stratified based on receipt of OOS. Criteria for OOS included 90-day survival, no 30-day readmission, length of stay ≤7 days, negative resection margins, ≥12 lymph nodes harvested, and receipt of chemotherapy. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of OOS. Survival curves and a Cox proportional hazards model were created to compare survival and identify risk factors for mortality. RESULTS Three thousand five hundred forty-six patients were identified. The rate of OOS was 22.3%. Diagnosis after 2012, treatment at an academic medical center, and a minimally invasive surgical approach (MIS) were associated with OOS. Survival was superior for patients undergoing OOS. Decreasing age at diagnosis, fewer comorbidities, surgery at an academic medical center, MIS, and lower pathologic stage were also associated with improved survival on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Rates of OOS for distal pancreatectomy are low. Time trends show increasing rates of OOS that may be related to increasing MIS, adjuvant chemotherapy, and referrals to academic medical centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Hrebinko
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jiang L, Ning D, Chen XP. Improvement in distal pancreatectomy for tumors in the body and tail of the pancreas. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:49. [PMID: 33588845 PMCID: PMC7885351 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02159-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic resections are complex and technically challenging surgical procedures. They often come with potential limitations to high-volume centers. Distal pancreatectomy is a relatively simple procedure in most cases. It facilitates the development of up-to-date minimally invasive surgical procedures in pancreatic surgery including laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy. Main body To obtain a desirable long-term prognosis, R0 resection and adequate lymphadenectomy are crucial to the surgical management of pancreatic cancer, and they demand standard procedure and multi-visceral resection if necessary. With respect to combined organ resection, progress has been made in evaluating and determining when and how to preserve the spleen. The postoperative pancreatic fistula, however, remains the most significant complication of distal pancreatectomy, with a rather high incidence. In addition, a safe closure of the pancreatic remnant persists as an area of concern. Therefore, much efforts that focus on the management of the pancreatic stump have been made to mitigate morbidity. Conclusion This review summarized the historical development of the techniques for pancreatic resections in recent years and describes the progress. The review eventually looked into the controversies regarding distal pancreatectomy for tumors in the body and tail of the pancreas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Jiang
- Department of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Deng Ning
- Department of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Xiao-Ping Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
[Evidence for robotics in oncological pancreatic surgery]. Chirurg 2021; 92:102-106. [PMID: 33064158 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-020-01299-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Robotic surgical procedures have been implemented and have become an important development in pancreatic surgery with an increasing acceptance worldwide. Nearly all types of pancreatic surgery have now been performed robotically and especially standardized resections, such as distal pancreatectomy (RDP) and partial pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) have gained importance despite a potentially long learning curve and high associated procedural costs. The present review article summarizes the available literature and evidence on the respective procedures focused on their use for indications of malignancy.
Collapse
|
36
|
Schwarz JL, Hogg ME. Current state of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery. J Surg Oncol 2021; 123:1370-1386. [PMID: 33559146 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The growth in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS) has been accompanied by a recent surge in evidence-based data available to analyze patient outcomes. A small complement of randomized control trials as well as a multitude of observational studies have demonstrated both consistent similarities and differences between MIPS and the open approach, although abundant questions remain. This review highlights the available literature and emphasizes key factors for evaluating laparoscopic and robotic pancreatic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason L Schwarz
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chopra A, Nassour I, Zureikat A, Paniccia A. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Updates Surg 2021; 73:947-953. [PMID: 33394353 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00927-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The utilization of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is increasing, yet debate remains regarding its oncologic safety in the setting of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Herein we present our institutional experience with robotic (RDP), laparoscopic (LDP), and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) in the setting of PDAC.Retrospective review of a prospectively collected single institutional database of patients undergoing consecutive ODP, LDP, and RDP for left-sided PDAC between January 2008 and December 2019 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) was done. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared using non-parametric testing and Fischer exact or chi-squared testing. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for disease-free survival and overall survival were compared by Log-Rank sum test. Backward Cox-proportional hazard regression analysis was used to determine if the operative approach was an independent predictor of recurrence and overall survival.Over 12 years, 146 consecutive distal pancreatectomies for PDAC were performed, of which 28.1% ODP, 60.3% RDP, and 11.6% LDP. There were no statistical differences in patients' baseline characteristics, including gender, comorbidities, prior abdominal surgeries, and AJCC8th stage (p > 0.05). Postoperatively, there was no difference in the frequency of major complications (p = 0.414), CR-POPF (p = 0.563), or DGE (p = 0.179). The median overall survival was 28.4 months for ODP, 34.6 months for RDP, and 32.5 months for LDP (Log Rank p = 0.914). On multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, the surgical approach was not associated with overall survival. This comparative analysis suggests a non-inferiority of RDP platforms, compared to LDP and classic ODP. The merits of MIS pancreatic surgery in the setting of PDAC should be evaluated in future prospective studies with care to analyze RDP outcomes separately from LDP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asmita Chopra
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disorder Clinic, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop St 3rd Fl, Suite D380, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213-2536, USA
| | - Ibrahim Nassour
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disorder Clinic, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop St 3rd Fl, Suite D380, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213-2536, USA
| | - Amer Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disorder Clinic, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop St 3rd Fl, Suite D380, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213-2536, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disorder Clinic, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop St 3rd Fl, Suite D380, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213-2536, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ishido K, Hakamada K, Kimura N, Miura T, Wakiya T. Essential updates 2018/2019: Current topics in the surgical treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:7-23. [PMID: 33532676 PMCID: PMC7832965 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is highly malignant. While cancers in other organs have shown clear improvements in 5-year survival, the 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer is approximately 10%. Early relapse and metastasis are not uncommon, making it difficult to achieve an acceptable prognosis even after complete surgical resection of the pancreas. Studies have been performed on various treatments to improve the prognosis of PDAC, and multidisciplinary approaches including non-surgical treatments have led to gradual improvement. In the present literature review, we have described the significance of anatomical and biological resectability criteria, the concept of R0 resection in surgical treatment, the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery, the remarkable development of perioperative chemotherapy, the effectiveness of conversion surgery for unresectable PDAC, and ongoing challenges in PDAC treatment. We also provide an essential update on these subjects by focusing on recent trends and topics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keinosuke Ishido
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryHirosaki University Graduate School of MedicineHirosakiJapan
| | - Kenichi Hakamada
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryHirosaki University Graduate School of MedicineHirosakiJapan
| | - Norihisa Kimura
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryHirosaki University Graduate School of MedicineHirosakiJapan
| | - Takuya Miura
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryHirosaki University Graduate School of MedicineHirosakiJapan
| | - Taiichi Wakiya
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryHirosaki University Graduate School of MedicineHirosakiJapan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Fahmy JN, Varsanik MA, Hubbs D, Eguia E, Abood G, Knab LM. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Surgical outcomes and survival analysis. Am J Surg 2020; 221:529-533. [PMID: 33375953 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are rare, with rising incidence and limited clinicopathological studies. METHODS Adult patients with pNET at a single tertiary care center were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS In total, 87 patients with histologically confirmed pNET who underwent resection were evaluated. 11% of patients had functioning pNETs: 9 insulinoma and 1 VIPoma. The majority (88.5%) were nonfunctioning. The most common surgical procedure performed was distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (36.8%). 35.6% of cases were performed with minimally invasive surgery (MIS). MIS patients had fewer postoperative complications, shorter length of stay, and fewer ICU admissions.Disease-free survival (DFS) was unaffected by tumor size (p = 0.5) or lymph node status (p = 0.62). Patients with high-grade (G3) tumors experienced significantly shorter DFS (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS This series demonstrates that survival in patients with pNET is driven mostly by tumor grade, though overall most have long-term survival after surgical resection. Additionally, an MIS approach is efficacious in appropriately selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph N Fahmy
- Loyola University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Maywood, IL, USA.
| | - M Alyssa Varsanik
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Daniel Hubbs
- Loyola University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Emanuel Eguia
- Loyola University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Gerard Abood
- Loyola University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Lawrence M Knab
- Loyola University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Maywood, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Baimas-George M, Watson M, Thompson K, Shastry V, Iannitti D, Martinie JB, Baker E, Parala-Metz A, Vrochides D. Prehabilitation for Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Patients: Interim Analysis Demonstrates a Protective Effect From Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Improvement in the Frailty Phenotype. Am Surg 2020; 87:714-724. [PMID: 33170023 DOI: 10.1177/0003134820952378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prehabilitation encompasses multidisciplinary interventions to improve health and lessen incidence of surgical deterioration by reducing physiologic stress and functional decline. This study presents an interim analysis to demonstrate prehabilitation for hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgical patients. METHODS In 2018, a structured prehabilitation pilot program was implemented. Eligibility required HPB malignancy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and residence within hour drive. Patients were enrolled into the 4-month program. The fitness component was composed of timed up and go test and grip strength with exercise recommendations. Nutrition involved evaluation of sarcopenic obesity, glucose management, and smoking and alcohol counseling. Psychological services included psychosocial assessments and advanced care planning, with social work referrals. Component were evaluated monthly by a physician using laboratory results, nutritional data and questionnaires, psychological assessments, and validated fitness tests. Nurse navigators spoke with patients weekly to monitor compliance. RESULTS At 12 months, nineteen patients were enrolled. Ten completed prehabilitation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent their surgical procedure. There were no differences found after prehabilitation in functional status, physical performance, psychosocial assessments, or nutrition. Frailty, as assessed by Fried frailty criteria, improved significantly after prehabilitation (P < .0001). Symptom severity and laboratory values did not change. Length of stay was 6.5 days and all patients were discharged to home. There was 1 readmission for transient ischemic attack and 90-day mortality rate was 0%. DISCUSSION Prehabilitation to improve recovery is a promising concept encompassing a wide array of multidisciplinary assessments and interventions. It may demonstrate a protective effect on physiologic decline from chemotherapy and may reverse frailty phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Baimas-George
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Michael Watson
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Kyle Thompson
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Vivek Shastry
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - David Iannitti
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - John B Martinie
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Erin Baker
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Armida Parala-Metz
- Department of Supportive Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Newhook TE, Tzeng CWD. ASO Author Reflections: Tumor Biology and Safe Surgery Remain Major Determinants of Survival After Resection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:1570-1571. [PMID: 32880772 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09087-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|