Outcomes and technical modifications of vascularized lymph node transplantation from the lateral thoracic region for treatment of lymphedema

Commercial Insurance Rates and Coding for Lymphedema Procedures: The Current State of Confusion and Need for Consensus

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of lymphedema has outpaced coding paradigms. In the setting of ambiguity regarding coding for physiologic procedures [lymphovenous bypass (LVB) and vascularized lymph node transplant (VLNT)], we hypothesized that there would be variation in commercial reimbursement based on coding pattern.

METHODS

The authors performed a cross-sectional analysis of 2021 nationwide hospital pricing data for 21 CPT codes encompassing excisional (direct excision, liposuction), physiologic (LVB, VLNT), and ancillary (lymphangiography) procedures. Within-hospital ratios (WHRs) and across-hospital ratios (AHRs) for adjusted commercial rates per CPT code quantified price variation. Mixed effects linear regression modeled associations of commercial rate with public payer (Medicare and Medicaid), self-pay, and chargemaster rates.

RESULTS

A total of 270,254 commercial rates, including 95,774 rates for physiologic procedures, were extracted from 2863 hospitals. Lymphangiography codes varied most in commercial price (WHR, 1.76 to 3.89; AHR, 8.12 to 44.38). For physiologic codes, WHRs ranged from 1.01 (VLNT; free omental flap) to 3.03 (LVB; unlisted lymphatic procedure), and AHRs ranged from 5.23 (LVB; lymphatic channel incision) to 10.36 (LVB; unlisted lymphatic procedure). Median adjusted commercial rates for excisional procedures ($3635.84) were higher than for physiologic procedures ($2560.40; P < 0.001). Commercial rate positively correlated with Medicare rate for all physiologic codes combined, although regression coefficients varied by code.

CONCLUSIONS

Commercial payer-negotiated rates for physiologic procedures were highly variable both within and across hospitals, reflective of variation in CPT codes. Physiologic procedures may be undervalued relative to excisional procedures. Consistent coding nomenclature should be developed for physiologic and ancillary procedures.

A Prospective Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Vascularized Lymph Node Transplant

PURPOSE

While vascularized lymph node transplant (VLNT) has gained popularity, there are a lack of prospective long-term studies and standardized outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of VLNT using all available outcome measures.

METHODS

This was a prospective study on all consecutive patients who underwent VLNT. Outcomes were assessed with 2 patient-reported outcome metrics, limb volume, bioimpedance, need for compression, and incidence of cellulitis.

RESULTS

There were 89 patients with the following donor sites: omentum (73%), axilla (13%), supraclavicular (7%), groin (3.5%). The mean follow-up was 23.7±12 months. There was a significant improvement at 2 years postoperatively across all outcome measures: 28.4% improvement in the Lymphedema Life Impact Scale, 20% average reduction in limb volume, 27.5% improvement in bioimpedance score, 93% reduction in cellulitis, and 34% of patients no longer required compression. Complications were transient and low without any donor site lymphedema.

CONCLUSIONS

VLNT is a safe and effective treatment for lymphedema with significant benefits fully manifesting at 2 years postoperatively. Omentum does not have any donor site lymphedema risk making it an attractive first choice.