The size of regional lymph nodes does not correlate with the presence or absence of metastasis in lymph nodes in rectal cancer

Prognostic and predictive impact of metastatic organ involvement on maintenance therapy in advanced metastatic colorectal cancer: Subgroup analysis of patients treated within the PanaMa trial (AIO KRK 0212)

Despite molecular selection, patients (pts) with RAS wildtype mCRC represent a heterogeneous population including diversity in metastatic spread. We investigated metastatic patterns for their prognostic and predictive impact on maintenance therapy with 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid ± panitumumab. The study population was stratified according to (1) number of involved metastatic sites (single vs multiple organ metastasis), liver-limited disease vs (2) liver metastasis plus one additional site, and (3) vs liver metastasis plus ≥two additional sites. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regressions were used to correlate efficacy endpoints. Single organ metastasis was observed in 133 pts (53.6%) with 102 pts (41.1%) presenting with liver-limited disease, while multiple organ metastases were reported in 114 pts (46.0). Multiple compared to single organ metastases were associated with less favorable PFS (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.13-1.93; P = .004) and OS (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.98-1.93; P = .068) of maintenance therapy. While metastatic spread involving one additional extrahepatic site was not associated with clearly impaired survival compared to liver-limited disease, pts with liver metastasis plus ≥two additional sites demonstrated less favorable PFS (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.30-2.83; P < .001), and OS (HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.51-3.76; P < .001) of maintenance therapy. Pmab-containing maintenance therapy appeared active in both pts with multiple (HR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.86; P = .006) as well as to a lesser numerical extent in pts with single organ metastasis (HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.57-1.21; P = .332; Interaction P = .183). These data may support clinical decisions when EGFR-based maintenance therapy is considered.

Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer - Can it be trusted?

PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic modality for the evaluation of primary rectal cancer, but MRI assessment of nodal involvement remains a confounding factor.

METHOD

This prospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of preoperative MRI in the assessment of nodal status by comparing histopathology reports to MRI findings on a node-by-node basis in 69 patients with rectal cancer.

RESULTS

Primary surgery was performed in 40 (58.0%) patients; 29 (42.0%) study patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Histopathological examination revealed T1 tumour in 8 (11.6%) patients, T2 tumour in 30 (43.5%), and T3 tumour in 25 (36.2%). In total, 897 lymph nodes (LNs) have been harvested (13.1 ± 5.4 LNs per specimen). There were 77 MRI-suspicious LNs, 21 (27.3%) of which were histologically proven malignant. The sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2% and specificity 93.4%. Of the 28 patients with MRI-suspicious LNs the diagnosis was correct in 42.8%. The MRI accuracy was 33.3% in "primary surgery" subgroup (n = 18, malignant LNs found in 6 patients). Diagnosis of MRI-negative LNs was correct in 90.2% of study patients; malignant nodes were found in 9.8% of patients initially classified as cN0.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI prediction of nodal status in patients with rectal cancer has very low accuracy. Decisions regarding neoadjuvant CRT should not be based on MRI assessment of nodal status, but on the MRI evaluation of tumour depth invasion (T stage and relationship between the tumour and mesorectal fascia).

SAR user guide to the rectal MR synoptic report (primary staging)

Rectal MR is the key diagnostic exam at initial presentation for rectal cancer patients. It is the primary determinant in establishing clinical stage for the patient and greatly impacts the clinical decision-making process. Consequently, structured reporting for MR is critically important to ensure that all required information is provided to the clinical care team. The SAR initial staging reporting template has been constructed to address these important items, including locoregional extent and factors impacting the surgical approach and management of the patient. Potential outputs to each item are defined, requiring the radiologist to commit to a result. This provides essential information to the surgeon or oncologist to make specific treatment deisions for the patient. The SAR Initial Staging MR reporting template has now been officially adopted by the NAPRC (National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer) under the American College of Surgery. With the recent revisions to the reporting template, this user guide has been revamped to improve its practicality and support to the radiologist to complete the structured report. Each line item of the report is supplemented with clinical perspectives, images, and illustrations to help the radiologist understand the potential implications for a given finding. Common errors and pitfalls to avoid are highlighted. Ideally, rectal MR interpretation should not occur in a vacuum but in the context of a multi-disciplinary tumor board to ensure that healthcare providers use common terminology and share a solid understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of MR.

Lymph Nodes Evaluation in Rectal Cancer: Where Do We Stand and Future Perspective

The assessment of nodal involvement in patients with rectal cancer (RC) is fundamental in disease management. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is routinely used for local and nodal staging of RC by using morphological criteria. The actual dimensional and morphological criteria for nodal assessment present several limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity. For these reasons, several different techniques, such as Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI), Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM), Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI), and Dynamic Contrast Enhancement (DCE) in MRI have been introduced but still not fully validated. Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/CT plays a pivotal role in the assessment of LNs; more recently PET/MRI has been introduced. The advantages and limitations of these imaging modalities will be provided in this narrative review. The second part of the review includes experimental techniques, such as iron-oxide particles (SPIO), and dual-energy CT (DECT). Radiomics analysis is an active field of research, and the evidence about LNs in RC will be discussed. The review also discusses the different recommendations between the European and North American guidelines for the evaluation of LNs in RC, from anatomical considerations to structured reporting.

Characteristics of tumour stroma in regional lymph node metastases in colorectal cancer patients: a theoretical framework for future diagnostic imaging with FAPI PET/CT

Purpose

The recently developed fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) tracer for PET/CT, binding tumour-stromal cancer-associated fibroblasts, is a promising tool for detection of positive lymph nodes. This study provides an overview of features, including sizes and tumour-stromal content, of lymph nodes and their respective lymph node metastases (LNM) in colorectal cancer (CRC), since literature lacks on whether LNMs contain sufficient stroma to potentially allow FAPI-based tumour detection.

Methods

Haematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue slides from 73 stage III colon cancer patients were included. Diameters and areas of all lymph nodes and their LNMs were assessed, the amount of stroma by measuring the stromal compartment area, the conventional and total tumour-stroma ratios (TSR-c and TSR-t, respectively), as well as correlations between these parameters. Also, subgroup analysis using a minimal diameter cut off of 5.0 mm was performed.

Results

In total, 126 lymph nodes were analysed. Although positive correlations were observed between node and LNM for diameter and area (r = 0.852, p < 0.001 and r = 0.960, p < 0.001, respectively), and also between the LNM stromal compartment area and nodal diameter (r = 0.612, p < 0.001), nodal area (r = 0.747, p < 0.001) and LNM area (r = 0.746, p < 0.001), novel insight was that nearly all (98%) LNMs contained stroma, with median TSR-c scores of 35% (IQR 20–60%) and TSR-t of 20% (IQR 10–30%). Moreover, a total of 32 (25%) positive lymph nodes had a diameter of < 5.0 mm.

Conclusion

In LNMs, stroma is abundantly present, independent of size, suggesting a role for FAPI PET/CT in improved lymph node detection in CRC.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Accuracy of Various Lymph Node Staging Criteria in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based lymph node staging remains a significant challenge in the treatment of rectal cancer. Pretreatment evaluation of lymph node metastasis guides the formulation of treatment plans. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI in lymph node staging using various morphological criteria.

Methods

A systematic search of the EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane databases was performed. Original articles published between 2000 and January 2021 that used MRI for lymph node staging in rectal cancer were eligible. The included studies were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A bivariate random-effects model was used to conduct a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

Results

Thirty-seven studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of preoperative MRI for the lymph node stage were 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68–0.77), 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68–0.80), and 7.85 (95% CI, 5.78–10.66), respectively. Criteria for positive mesorectal lymph node metastasis included (A) a short-axis diameter of 5 mm, (B) morphological standard, including an irregular border and mixed-signal intensity within the lymph node, (C) a short-axis diameter of 5 mm with the morphological standard, (D) a short-axis diameter of 8 mm with the morphological standard, and (E) a short-axis diameter of 10 mm with the morphological standard. The pooled sensitivity/specificity for these criteria were 75%/64%, 81%/67%, 74%/79%, 72%/66%, and 62%/91%, respectively. There was no significant difference among the criteria in sensitivity/specificity. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve values of the fitted summary ROC indicated a diagnostic accuracy rate of 0.75–0.81.

Conclusion

MRI scans have minimal accuracy as a reference index for pretreatment staging of various lymph node staging criteria in rectal cancer. Multiple types of evidence should be used in clinical decision-making.

A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: a node-for-node comparative study of MRI and histopathology

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to construct and validate a nomogram to predict its occurrence with node-for-node histopathological validation.

METHODS

Our prediction model was developed between March 2015 and August 2016 using a prospective primary cohort (32 patients, mean age: 57.3 years) that included 324 lymph nodes (LNs) from MR images with node-for-node histopathological validation. We evaluated multiple MRI variables, and a multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop the predictive nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was assessed with respect to its calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. The performance of the nomogram in predicting LNM was validated in an independent clinical validation cohort comprising 182 consecutive patients.

RESULTS

The predictors included in the individualized prediction nomogram were chemical shift effect (CSE), nodal border, short-axis diameter of nodes, and minimum distance to rectal cancer or rectal wall. The nomogram showed good discrimination (C-index: 0.947; 95% confidence interval: 0.920-0.974) and good calibration in the primary cohort. Decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical usefulness of the nomogram in predicting the status of each LN. For the prediction of LN status in the clinical validation cohort by readers 1 and 2, the areas under the curves using the nomogram were 0.890 and 0.841, and the areas under the curves of readers using their experience were 0.754 and 0.704, respectively. Diagnostic efficiency was significantly improved by using the nomogram (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram, which incorporates CSE, nodal location, short-axis diameter, and minimum distance to rectal cancer or rectal wall, can be conveniently applied in clinical practice to facilitate the prediction of LNM in patients with rectal cancer.

Improving staging of rectal cancer in the pelvis: the role of PET/MRI

PURPOSE

The role of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) in evaluating the local extent of rectal cancer remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the possible role of PET/MR versus magnetic resonance (MR) in clinically staging rectal cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective two-center cohort study of 62 patients with untreated rectal cancer investigated the possible role of baseline staging PET/MR versus stand-alone MR in determination of clinical stage. Two readers reviewed T and N stage, mesorectal fascia involvement, tumor length, distance from the anal verge, sphincter involvement, and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI). Sigmoidoscopy, digital rectal examination, and follow-up imaging, along with surgery when available, served as the reference standard.

RESULTS

PET/MR outperformed MR in evaluating tumor size (42.5 ± 21.03 mm per the reference standard, 54 ± 20.45 mm by stand-alone MR, and 44 ± 20 mm by PET/MR, P = 0.004), and in identifying N status (correct by MR in 36/62 patients [58%] and by PET/MR in 49/62 cases [79%]; P = 0.02) and external sphincter infiltration (correct by MR in 6/10 and by PET/MR in 9/10; P = 0.003). No statistically significant differences were observed in relation to any other features.

CONCLUSION

PET/MR provides a more precise assessment of the local extent of rectal cancers in evaluating cancer length, N status, and external sphincter involvement. PET/MR offers the opportunity to improve clinical decision-making, especially when evaluating low rectal tumors with possible external sphincter involvement.

Understanding the Lymphatics: Review of the N Category in the Updated TNM Staging of Cancers of the Digestive System

OBJECTIVE. The N category has been significantly updated in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer's TNM classification. To ensure correct tumor staging, prognosis, and management, it is critical to be aware of these changes. This article reviews the updated N category, organ-specific regional lymph nodes, and lymphatic drainage pathways for cancers of the digestive system from the esophagus to the anal canal. CONCLUSION. Detection of lymph node involvement may be challenging, and knowledge of nodal characteristics, lymphatic drainage pathways, and imaging modalities is essential to optimize detection rate to ensure accurate staging, prognosis estimation, and streamlined management.

MRI Evaluation of the Response of Rectal Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy

MRI plays a critical role in the staging and restaging of rectal cancer. Although newly diagnosed early-stage rectal cancers may immediately be amenable to surgical resection, patients with advanced disease first undergo neoadjuvant therapy that consists of a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Evaluation of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy is best performed with MRI, given its superior soft-tissue contrast and its ability to allow multiplanar imaging and functional evaluation. In this setting, MRI allows accurate evaluation of primary tumor staging, which is determined on the basis of the depth of invasion within and through the rectal wall and the involvement of adjacent organs. MRI can also be used to evaluate posttreatment morphologic components within the tumors, including fibrosis and mucinous changes that have been shown to correlate with the response to treatment. Additional features such as the circumferential resection margin and extramural vascular invasion-factors shown to affect prognosis and local recurrence-are also assessed before and after therapy. Functional assessment with diffusion-weighted MRI and perfusion MRI plays a role in predicting tumor aggressiveness and the likelihood of response to treatment, as well as the extent of residual tumor after therapy. Lymph node staging is also performed at MRI, with assessment of not only lymph node size but also the internal architecture and signal intensity characteristics. ^©RSNA, 2019 See discussion on this article by Wasnik and Al-Hawary .

Carnoy solution versus GEWF solution for lymph node revealing in colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the performance of two lymph node revealing solutions.

METHODS

This randomized clinical trial (NTC02704988) investigated patients with colon or rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection with D2 lymphadenectomy. Specimens submitted for conventional pathological examination were randomly assigned for additional fixation with Carnoy or GEWF solution, and dissection was performed to examine the missed lymph nodes. The number of lymph nodes retrieved, additional identified metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node upstaging, and complementary indication of adjuvant therapy were investigated.

RESULTS

The number of lymph nodes retrieved was significantly higher with the use of lymph node revealing solutions than with the conventional method in colon cancer (GEWF: 29.5 vs 27; p < 0.001; Carnoy: 27.7 vs 25.2; p < 0.001) and rectal cancer (GEWF: 25.8 vs 23.6; p < 0.001; Carnoy: 23.1 vs 20.8; p < 0.001). There were no differences between the solutions and conventional examination with respect to the median number of additional metastatic lymph nodes identified (0 in all arms), the number of patients with lymph node upstaging (colon cancer: 1 in the Carnoy arm, 0 in the GEWF arm; rectal cancer: 1 in the GEWF arm, 0 in the Carnoy arm), or the number of patients with complementary indication of adjuvant therapy (colon cancer: 1 in the Carnoy arm, 0 in the GEWF arm; rectal cancer: 0 in both arms).

CONCLUSION

Despite the higher number of lymph nodes retrieved, neither solution resulted in significant changes in patient staging or treatment. Both solutions exhibited equal performance with respect to all outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NTC02704988.

Effect of activated carbon nanoparticles on lymph node harvest in patients with colorectal cancer

AIM

The aim was to examine the effect of activated carbon nanoparticles (ACNs) on lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS

This prospective randomized study of 80 subjects was performed between March 2016 and December 2016. Eighty patients with CRC were randomly divided into two groups, the ACN group and a control group. The patients in the ACN group were subjected to 1 ml of ACN injection in the subserosa around the tumour before colectomy and D3 lymphadenectomy. The patients in the control group received the same procedure without the injection of ACNs. After surgery, lymph nodes were isolated, and the greatest dimensions were measured by the same pathologist.

RESULTS

The average number of lymph nodes harvested from each patient was markedly more in the ACN group (31.3 ± 8.1) than in the control group (21.9 ± 5.3; P < 0.001), and the average number of lymph nodes less than 5 mm in greatest dimension was significantly more in the ACN group (11.9 ± 4.9) than in the control group (4.1 ± 2.4; P < 0.001). The ACN group (15/40) had a higher rate of Stage III patients compared to the control group (6/39; P = 0.026). Besides, the greatest dimension of 32.8% metastatic lymph nodes was less than 5 mm.

CONCLUSION

There is significant upstaging following the use of ACNs, which could find more involved nodes. Therefore, ACNs can be used as a tracer to harvest more lymph nodes in CRC patients, with improvement in the accuracy of pathological staging.

MRI of Rectal Cancer: Tumor Staging, Imaging Techniques, and Management

Rectal cancer is prone to local recurrence and systemic metastasis. However, owing to improvements in TNM staging and treatment, including a more widespread use of rectal MRI and increased radiologist awareness of the key rectal cancer TNM staging features, the mortality rate of rectal cancer has been declining over the past few decades in adults over 50 years of age. Currently, rectal MRI plays a key role in the pre- and posttreatment evaluation of rectal cancer, assisting the multidisciplinary team in tailoring the most appropriate treatment option. The benefits achieved with rectal MRI are strictly dependent on obtaining good-quality images, which is important for the characterization of the main anatomic structures and their relationship with the tumor. In primary staging, rectal MRI helps the radiologist (a) describe the tumor location and morphology, (b) provide its T and N categories, (c) detect the presence of extramural vascular invasion, and (d) identify its relationship with surrounding structures, including the sphincter complex and involvement of the mesorectal fascia. These features help diagnose locally advanced rectal tumors (categories T3c-d, T4, N1, and N2), for which neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is indicated. In restaging after neoadjuvant CRT, in addition to reassessing the features noted during primary staging, rectal MRI can help in the assessment of treatment response, especially with the emergence of nonsurgical approaches such as "watch and wait." ^©RSNA, 2019.

Role of Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Evaluating Regional Lymph Nodes With a Short-Axis Diameter of Less Than 5 mm in Rectal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to discriminate metastatic from nonmetastatic regional lymph nodes (LNs) with short-axis diameters of less than 5 mm in rectal cancer using quantitative parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Sixty-five LNs from 122 patients were evaluated, including malignant LNs (n = 27) and benign LNs (n = 38). The following parameters were assessed: the forward volume transfer constant (K^trans), reverse volume transfer constant (k_ep), fractional extravascular extracellular space volume (Ve), short-axis diameter, long-axis diameter, and short- to long-axis diameter ratio. ROC curves were used to analyze statistically significant parameters.

RESULTS

Metastatic LNs exhibited a lower K^trans than did nonmetastatic LNs (p < 0.001), but the other parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. The AUC of the K^trans was 0.732, with a 95% CI of 0.610-0.854, and the diagnostic cutoff value was 0.088 min^-1 (sensitivity, 60.5%; specificity, 81.5%).

CONCLUSION

K^trans had moderate diagnostic performance in assessing small regional LNs in rectal cancer and appears to be a useful predictor when distinguishing malignant LNs from benign LNs only by morphology is difficult.

Colorectal Cancer: What has Changed in Diagnosis and Treatment over the Last 50 Years?

Aims and background

This overview focuses on what has changed in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer over the last 50 years.

Methods

The most important international registers (SEER, European and Italian) as well as the literature have been consulted. Furthermore, many prognostic factors are analyzed with the aim to understand the reasons why 5-year survival has improved over the last two decades.

Results

Since the biologic characteristics of the tumor cannot be changed, improved survival must be supported by concomitant multiple factors, such as earlier diagnosis (as given by a more informed educational behavior and the advent of screening) as well as the wide use of colonoscopy and the technical improvement of surgical and medical treatment. However, it seems that the greatest improvement in survival is limited to 5-year controls, whereas long-term survival does not appear to show any significant improvement.

Conclusions

We can hypothesize that our efforts have just delayed the inevitable end: death. Nevertheless, further research should be done to confirm this hypothesis, perhaps in the field of molecular biology, which may also be the right approach to understanding the biologic aggressiveness of each tumor.

Pitfalls in MRI of rectal cancer: What radiologists need to know and avoid

Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become an important component of clinical management. Although MRI is the modality of choice for rectal cancer diagnosis and staging, there are certain inherent potential pitfalls that radiologists need to recognize in order to avoid imaging misinterpretation, including choice of MRI protocol; choice of MRI technique; potential mimickers of rectal cancer; mucinous rectal tumor; differentiation between extramural tumor invasion and desmoplastic reaction; differentiation between low rectal cancer and anal cancer; problems relating to nodal involvement, peritoneal reflection, and mesorectal fascia invasion; and, challenges associated with restaging, post-treatment changes, and complications. The aim of this article was to heighten radiologist awareness of these potential pitfalls in order to improve diagnosis, decision-making, and patient outcomes.

Is it important to palpate lymph nodes in open surgery for colorectal cancer?

INTRODUCTION

In laparoscopic or robotic surgery, surgeons cannot directly palpate lymph nodes (LN), which could be considered a shortcoming in that procedure. This study was performed to evaluate the importance of palpation diagnosis of LN metastasis in colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

This study enrolled 408 patients who underwent curative resection for primary colorectal cancer in our department in 2014. The diameter of each manually dissected LN was measured, and the LN was then examined by palpation to determine whether it was metastatic based on its consistency. The palpation and pathological diagnoses of each LN were compared. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, and accuracies were calculated for palpation diagnosis of LN metastasis in a node-by-node analysis, according to LN size.

RESULTS

Of the 13 750 dissected LN, 444 LN (3.2%) were metastatic. Overall, palpation diagnosis of LN metastasis revealed node-by-node sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 50%, 98%, 52%, 98%, and 97%, respectively. The sensitivity for LN 3 mm and smaller and for LN 15 mm and larger was 3% and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Palpation diagnosis of LN metastasis in colorectal cancer surgery was unreliable. Although poor haptics is considered to be a disadvantage in laparoscopic and robotic surgery, they are not inferior to open surgery in terms of LN dissection.

Ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxides for metastatic lymph node detection: back on the block

In the past 15 years, encouraging clinical results for the detection of small lymph node metastases was obtained by the use of Combidex‐enhanced MRI (CEM, also known as magnetic resonance lymphography). Withdrawal of the European Medicines Agency approval application by the manufacturer made it impossible for patients to benefit from this agent; a loss, especially for men with prostate cancer. Current conventional imaging techniques are not as accurate as CEM is, thus a surgical diagnostic exploration (extended lymph node dissection) is still the preferred technique to evaluate the lymph nodes, resulting in peri‐ and postoperative complications. In 2013, the Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc) obtained all licenses and documentation for the production process of Combidex (ferumoxtran‐10), and manufactured the contrast agent under supervision of the Department of Pharmacy. Since 2014, 310 men with prostate cancer have been examined with CEM in the Radboudumc. Within this cohort, seven minor possibly contrast‐related adverse effects were observed after administration of Combidex. As the contrast agent is now back again in the Netherlands, this review highlights the working mechanism, previous results, observed side effects since the reintroduction, and the future perspectives for Combidex. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2018, 10:e1471. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1471

This article is categorized under: 1

Diagnostic Tools > In Vivo Nanodiagnostics and Imaging

2

Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease

Rectal Radiotherapy--Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Delivery, Delineation and Doses

The use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in rectal cancer is attractive in that it may reduce acute and late toxicities and potentially facilitate dose escalation. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy probably has a role in selected patients, but further investigation is required to identify the parameters for selection. Delineation of specific nodal groups allows maximal sparing of bladder and small bowel. In locally advanced tumours a simultaneous integrated boost allows dose escalation incorporating hypofractionation and a shorter overall treatment time. However, due to a sparsity of data on late toxicity in doses ≥ 60 Gy, doses at this level should be used with caution, ideally within prospective trials. Future studies investigating dose escalation must ascertain late toxicity as well as local control, as both can significantly affect quality of life and without both, the risk-benefit ratio cannot be calculated.

Added value of morphologic characteristics on diffusion-weighted images for characterizing lymph nodes in primary rectal cancer

To evaluate the added value of the morphologic features of lymph nodes (LNs) on diffusion-weighted images (DWI), an interval reading was performed for the T2-weighted images (T2WI) and the combined image set (T2WI and DWI) using extracted imaging characteristics from 54 metastatic and 172 benign LNs in 44 patients with primary rectal cancer. The specificity and accuracy increased after adding DWI to T2WI for both readers (specificity: from 59% to 73% and from 41% to 68% for readers 1 and 2, respectively; accuracy: from 58% to 68% and from 44% to 64% for readers 1 and 2, respectively, P<.0001).

Imaging in rectal cancer with emphasis on local staging with MRI

Imaging in rectal cancer has a vital role in staging disease, and in selecting and optimizing treatment planning. High-resolution MRI (HR-MRI) is the recommended method of first choice for local staging of rectal cancer for both primary staging and for restaging after preoperative chemoradiation (CT-RT). HR-MRI helps decide between upfront surgery and preoperative CT-RT. It provides high accuracy for prediction of circumferential resection margin at surgery, T category, and nodal status in that order. MRI also helps assess resectability after preoperative CT-RT and decide between sphincter saving or more radical surgery. Accurate technique is crucial for obtaining high-resolution images in the appropriate planes for correct staging. The phased array external coil has replaced the endorectal coil that is no longer recommended. Non-fat suppressed 2D T2-weighted (T2W) sequences in orthogonal planes to the tumor are sufficient for primary staging. Contrast-enhanced MRI is considered inappropriate for both primary staging and restaging. Diffusion-weighted sequence may be of value in restaging. Multidetector CT cannot replace MRI in local staging, but has an important role for evaluating distant metastases. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) has a limited role in the initial staging of rectal cancer and is reserved for cases with resectable metastatic disease before contemplating surgery. This article briefly reviews the comprehensive role of imaging in rectal cancer, describes the role of MRI in local staging in detail, discusses the optimal MRI technique, and provides a synoptic report for both primary staging and restaging after CT-RT in routine practice.

The impact of lymph node size to predict nodal metastasis in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

During restaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the assessment of lymph node (LN) metastasis is vital for selecting further treatment strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of LN size to predict LN metastasis in rectal cancer patients after preoperative CRT.

METHODS

A total of 30 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative CRT followed by curative resection of primary rectal cancer were selected as a study group (CRT group). As a control group (non-CRT group), 30 patients who underwent primary tumor resection were selected using a 1:1 case-match design. Matching criteria were gender, age, and clinical T stage. The size of each LN was measured from the surgical specimen. To clarify optimal cutoff values for node size according to the risk of detecting metastasis, receiving-operator characteristic (ROC) curves were generated.

RESULTS

In the non-CRT group, 39/474 LNs were confirmed to have metastasis. In the CRT group, 29/422 LNs showed metastasis. The median size of metastatic LNs was 6.0 mm in CRT group, which was significantly larger than 4.0 mm in the non-CRT group (p = 0.006). The optimal cutoff value for determining metastasis in the CRT group was 4.5 mm, compared to 3.5 mm in the non-CRT group. The accuracy of the cutoff value was much higher in the CRT group (CRT vs. non-CRT, 77.9 vs. 59.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

LN size is a strong indicator for prediction of regional LN metastasis in rectal cancer patients after preoperative CRT, compared to those without CRT.

Enhanced intensity on preoperative double contrast-enhanced sonography as a useful indicator of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of enhanced intensity on double contrast-enhanced sonography in assessing lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 357 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. Double contrast-enhanced sonography, in which an oral ultrasound contrast agent is combined with an intravenous contrast agent, was performed preoperatively, and the data were analyzed quantitatively. The predictive ability of enhanced intensity, a quantitative double contrast-enhanced sonographic measure, for lymph node metastasis was evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

Compared to negative lymph node metastasis cases, the presence of thicker lesions, deeper invasion, poorer differentiation, and higher enhanced intensity were found in positive cases (P< .05). An enhanced intensity cutoff value of 16.91 dB was the best point for balancing the sensitivity and specificity (71.50% and 79.30%, respectively) for prediction of lymph node metastasis, with the highest Youden index of 0.508. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.828 (P < .001; 95% confidence interval, 0.786-0.870). In cases in which the lesions were hyperenhanced (enhanced intensity >16.91 dB), the lesions were significantly thicker and had deeper invasion, poorer differentiation, and more positive metastasis findings compared to non-hyperenhanced cases (enhanced intensity ≤16.91 dB; P < .05). On logistic regression analysis, the enhanced intensity of primary tumors and the invasion depth were significantly associated with lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Double contrast-enhanced sonography with quantitative analysis may be considered a novel alternative imaging modality for noninvasive preoperative evaluation of lymph node metastasis with good reliability.

In vivo lymph node mapping and pattern of metastasis spread in locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

The lymph node status is one of the strongest prognostic determinants in rectal cancers. After chemoradiotherapy (CRT), lymph nodes are difficult to detect. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of lymph node mapping in the mesorectum after CRT to analyze the pattern of metastasis spread and to assess the reliability of blue dye injection in sentinel lymph node detection.

METHOD

Ten patients with cN+ mid/low RCs after CRT were prospectively enrolled. The protocol scheduled intraoperative blue dye injection, surgery, and specimen examination with fat clearance technique. The mesorectum was divided into three equal "levels" (upper, middle, and lower); each level was divided into three equal "sectors" (right anterolateral, posterior, and left anterolateral). Lymph nodes were defined "small" if ≤5 mm.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-six lymph nodes were retrieved in ten patients; 76.5 % were small lymph nodes. Six patients were pN+ (33 metastatic lymph nodes, 76 % small); small lymph node analysis upstaged one patient from N0 to N1 and four patients from N1 to N2. Metastasis distribution across sectors was continuous, without "skip sectors." The blue dye detected the sentinel lymph node in all patients; in half of the cases, it was out of the tumor sector. Blue dye identified 69.7 % of metastatic lymph nodes; its sensitivity decreased together with the metastatic deposit size (84 % macrometastases, 28.6 % micrometastases, 0 % occult tumor cells; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The fat clearance technique should be the standard pathological examination in patients with RCs after CRT; N staging was improved by small lymph node identification. Lymph node metastases have a continuous spread through mesorectal sectors. Blue dye injection is effective in sentinel lymph node detection.

Apparent diffusion coefficient for discriminating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in primary rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) could be used to discriminate metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with primary rectal cancer.

METHODS

This study investigated 34 patients (male: 12, female: 22, mean: 62.7, range: 37-82) who underwent 1.5-T MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and subsequent surgical resection. A blinded radiologist measured the ADC value in each regional LN after referring to the T2-weighted images and DWI. The t-test was used to compare the mean ADC values of the metastatic and non-metastatic LNs. A ROC analysis was performed to calculate the diagnostic performance and obtain the optimal cut-off. The histopathological results were used as the reference standard.

RESULTS

114 LNs (46 metastatic and 68 non-metastatic) were matched and analyzed. The mean ADC of the metastatic LNs was significantly lower than that of the non-metastatic LNs (0.9 ± 0.15 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; 1.1 ± 0.22 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, P<0.0001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.734 (95% confidence interval, 0.644-0.812). When an ADC value of 1.0 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s was used as the cut-off, a maximum accuracy of 72% was calculated (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 67%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although ADC could be used to discriminate metastatic from non-metastatic LNs, the diagnostic accuracy is approximately 70%.

Size of metastatic lymph nodes

We present a case and review of the literature of well-differentiated sigmoid adenocarcinoma with numerous metastases into pericolic lymph nodes. All positive lymph nodes were small. The authors concluded that there is no clear correlation between nodal size and the likelihood of metastasis in the lymph node, and the status of small lymph nodes must receive special attention by clinicians and pathologists.

Contributing factors on lymph node yield after surgery for mid-low rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the contributing factors to the lymph node status as well as to define the impact of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) on the number of lymph nodes retrieved in mid-low rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 277 patients who underwent curative surgical resection for mid-low rectal cancer between 1998 and 2007. Eighty-two patients received long course preoperative CCRT followed by surgery.

RESULTS

A mean of 13.12±9.28 lymph nodes was retrieved. In a univariate analysis, distance from the anal verge, pT stage, pN stage, lymphovascular invasion, preoperative CCRT had significant influence on the number of lymph nodes retrieved. In a multivariate model, patients in the CCRT group had fewer retrieved lymph nodes than the non-CCRT group (p<0.001). Both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the ypN0 group had fewer retrieved lymph nodes than the ypN1-2 group (p=0.027) in the CCRT group.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CCRT was an independent risk factor for failure to harvest an appropriate number of lymph nodes, and node-negative patients who received CCRT had fewer lymph nodes harvested.

Better retrieval of lymph nodes in colorectal resection specimens by pathologists' assistants

BACKGROUND

Errors in surgical pathology are partly due to the increasing workload of pathologists. To reduce this workload, 'pathologists' assistants' (PAs) have been trained to take over some of the pathologists' recurrent tasks. One of these tasks is the precise examination of ≥10 lymph nodes (LNs), which is of paramount importance to reduce the risk of understaging of colorectal cancer patients.

AIMS

To evaluate the role of PAs in harvesting LNs in colorectal resection specimens and, by doing so, in improving patient safety.

METHODS

LN harvest was retrospectively reviewed in 557 pathology reports on colorectal resection specimens collected in two Dutch hospitals from 2008 until 2011.

RESULTS

PAs sampled ≥10 LNs in significantly more cases than pathologists did (83.2% vs 60.9% in hospital A and 79.2% vs 67.6% in hospital B) and recovered on average significantly more LNs than pathologists did (18.5 vs 12.2 in hospital A and 16.6 vs 13.2 in hospital B). PAs harvested a significantly higher percentage of LNs <5 mm than pathologists did (64.2% vs 53.7%). The percentages of colon cancer patients eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy due to inadequate LN sampling alone were significantly higher for cases dissected by pathologists than for those dissected by PAs (17.3% vs 1.1% in hospital A and 13.1% vs 3.4% in hospital B) CONCLUSIONS: PAs contribute to patient safety since they recover more and, in particular, smaller LNs from colorectal resection specimens than pathologists do. Moreover, they help to reduce costs and morbidity by reducing the number of patients eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy due to inadequate LN sampling alone.

Reliability and Effectiveness of GEWF Solution in the Identification of Lymph Nodes in Specimens of Colorectal Carcinoma

Lymph node status is pivotal in the staging process of cancer. With regards to colorectal cancer, lymph node retrieval is always laborious. Sometimes, it is also a challenge to recover a minimum of 12 lymph nodes from the pericolorectal tissue. Among many proposed adjunctive solutions, GEWF solution (glacial acetic acid, ethanol, distilled water, and formaldehyde) has been introduced recently and suggested to be superior. To further evaluate its efficiency, the pericolorectal tissue, which has been reexamined extensively in the conventional condition, was refixed into GEWF solution in this study. More lymph nodes were found in 75% (n = 6) of the 8 experimental cases, and 50% (n = 4) of them had 12 or more yielded lymph nodes eventually. In addition, no adverse influences on the expressions of immunohistochemical and special stains were seen. These data support the reliability and effectiveness of GEWF solution in improvement of lymph node yield.

MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of primary rectal cancer: practical considerations

High-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging plays a pivotal role in the pretreatment assessment of primary rectal cancer. The success of this technique depends on obtaining good-quality high-resolution T2-weighted images of the primary tumor; the mesorectal fascia, peritoneal reflection, and other pelvic viscera; and superior rectal and pelvic sidewall lymph nodes. Although orthogonal axial high-resolution T2-weighted MR images are the cornerstone for the staging of primary rectal cancer, high-resolution sagittal and coronal images provide additional value, particularly in tumors that arise in a redundant tortuous rectum. Coronal high-resolution T2-weighted MR images also improve the assessment of nodal morphology, particularly for superior rectal and pelvic sidewall nodes, and of the relationship between advanced-stage tumors and adjacent pelvic structures. Rectal gel should be used in MR imaging examinations conducted for the staging of polypoid tumors, previously treated lesions, and small rectal tumors. However, it should not be used in examinations performed to stage large or low rectal tumors. Diffusion-weighted imaging is useful for identifying nodes and, occasionally, the primary tumor when the tumor is difficult to visualize with other sequences. Three-dimensional T2-weighted imaging provides multiplanar capability with a superior signal-to-noise ratio compared with two-dimensional T2-weighted imaging.

Primary staging and response assessment postchemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer

SUMMARY Initial assessment of newly diagnosed patients with rectal cancer includes clinical examination, colonoscopy, pelvic MRI and CT scan of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis. Radiological staging can objectively evaluate both surgical and biological prognostic features of rectal cancer. MRI has emerged to be the most useful preoperative prognostic staging tool and it can predict the risk of tumor involvement of surgical circumferential resection margin. An agreed definition of favorable tumor response to chemoradiotherapy is controversial. The importance of detecting and assessing good versus poor responders to chemoradiotherapy is of increasing relevance. MRI has been found to be useful in assessing tumor response postchemoradiotherapy, especially the assessment of potential circumferential resection margin and magnetic resonance tumor regression grade. These imaging markers predict survival outcomes for good and poor responders and provide an opportunity for clinicians to offer additional neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments to reduce local or distance failure for the poor responders.

Metastatic lymph nodes in hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does size matter?

AIM

To determine the diagnostic efficacy of the size criteria for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes (LN) in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA).

INTRODUCTION

LN metastasis is one of the most significant independent prognostic factors in patients with HCCA. Presently, in spite of the well known lack of sensitivity and specificity, one of the most used clinical criteria for nodal metastases is LN size.

METHODS

Pathological slides of 147 patients who had undergone exploration for HCCA were assessed. The size (maximum and short axis diameter) of each single node was retrieved from the pathology report or measured from a section on the glass slide using a stereo microscope and a calibrated ruler integrated in the software. When a metastatic lesion was detected, the proportion of the lesion in relation to LN size was estimated.

RESULTS

Out of 147 patients, 645 LN were retrieved and measured. In all, 106 nodes (16%) showed evidence of metastasis. The proportion of positive nodes was 8% in nodes <5 mm and 37% in nodes >30 mm. Ten per cent of LN smaller than 10 mm were positive, whereas only 23% of LN larger than 10 mm were metastastically involved. No clear cut-off point could be found. Similar results were found for the short axis diameter. In 50% of positive LN, the metastatic lesion accounted for 10% or less of the LN size.

CONCLUSION

No cut-off point could be determined for accurately predicting nodal involvement. Therefore, imaging studies should not rely on LN size when assessing nodal involvement.

Lymph node distribution and pattern of metastases in the mesorectum following total mesorectal excision using the modified fat clearing technique

AIM

To define the distribution, size, location and metastasis of lymph nodes (LNs) within the mesorectum from rectal cancer specimens following total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery without neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Specimens from 60 patients who underwent TME were treated with modified fat clearing solution to retrieve LNs. The mesorectum was divided into right lateral, anterior, posterior and left lateral sides, which were further subdivided into three levels (upper, middle and lower).

RESULTS

1436 LNs were harvested, including 985 small LNs (<5 mm in size). The number of LNs from the anterior, posterior and bilateral mesorectum was 125 (8.7%), 696 (48.5%) and 615 (42.8%), respectively. In the longitudinal axis, the difference in distribution at the three levels was not significant. 200 LN metastases (mLNs) were detected in 33 patients. 48% (96/200) of these were small LNs. More mLNs, especially small LNs, were shown in the more advanced T stage patients. The mLN metastasis rate was not influenced by tumour level.

CONCLUSION

Small LN detection increased the accuracy of N staging by 20% in this study. The incidence of metastasis was the same among the anterior, bilateral and posterior areas of the mesorectum. An increased incidence of mLN metastasis in small LNs was associated with more advanced T staging. mLN metastasis rates in both middle and low rectal cancer were higher in the distal mesorectum than that in the proximal mesorectum. LN number and density were not consistent with spread of the primary tumour. Distal mLNs were found in 35% of cases of both middle and distal rectal cancer, implying a need for TME in both.

Predicting lymph node status in patients with early gastric carcinoma using double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

INTRODUCTION

Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCUS) is a new method we used in predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with early gastric cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-six patients with early gastric cancer diagnosed by gastroscope and confirmed by pathology after operation were examined using DCUS preoperatively. Group N1 included 15 patients with LNM and group N0 61 patients without LNM.

RESULTS

In group N1, 13 patients (87%) had marked hyperenhancement during early arterial phase using DCUS, and 2 patients (13%) were unmarked as hyperenhancement. In group N0, 24 patients (39%) had marked hyperenhancement during early arterial phase using DCUS, and 37 patients (61%) had unmarked hyperenhancement. The sensitivity and specificity of marked hyperenhancement in predicting LNM in patients with early gastric cancer was 86.7% and 60.7% respectively, and the Youden's index was 0.474. The κ value of this method was 0.89.

CONCLUSIONS

Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is a new valuable method to evaluate LNM at an early stage of gastric cancer and prognosis of early gastric cancer preoperatively.

Anatomic Study of Distribution, Numbers, and Size of Lymph Nodes in Mesorectum in Indians: A Autopsy Study

This study was conducted to find the number, size, and distribution of the lymph nodes in the mesorectum in fresh cadavers without rectal cancer in Indians and to compare fat clearance method versus manual dissection of lymph nodes in terms of efficacy of lymph node yield. Thirty fresh cadavers underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) by midline incision. TME specimen was divided transversely (upper, middle, and lower thirds), and then further divided radially into 4 equal areas and the right lateral, left lateral, and posterior areas were taken for lymph node harvesting. In the first 15 cases (group A), lymph nodes were dissected manually from each of 9 areas. Number and diameters of harvested nodes were noted, and specimens were histopathologically examined. In the next 15 cases (group B), fat clearing technique was used, and the procedure was repeated. Mean number of lymph nodes recovered per cadaver was 6.2 (SD = 1.3; range, 5 to 9, group A = 5.86 ± 1.24, group B = 6.60 ± 1.29, P = .126) and mean size of the lymph node was 2.1 mm (SD = 0.38; range, 2 to 8 mm). Size and numbers of nodes in all the areas were similar between the 2 groups except in lower third, where smaller nodes were identified in greater numbers in group B. Manual dissection is an effective technique for node harvesting after TME, except for very small nodes found in the lower third of mesorectum. Accurate pathological examination of TME specimen is mandatory to avoid understaging of disease.

Lymph node size and metastatic infiltration in adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head

BACKGROUND

Preoperative lymph node staging of pancreatic cancer by CT relies on the premise that malignant lymph nodes are larger than benign nodes. In imaging procedures lymph nodes >1 cm in size are regarded as metastatic nodes. The extend of lymphadenectomy and potential application of neoadjuvant therapy regimens could be dependent on this evaluation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a morphometric study regional lymph nodes from 52 patients with pancreatic cancer were analyzed. The lymph nodes were counted, the largest diameter of each node was measured, and each node was analyzed for metastatic involvement by histopathological examination. The frequency of metastatic involvement was calculated and correlated with lymph node size.

RESULTS

A total of 636 lymph nodes were present in the 52 specimens examined for this study (12.2 lymph nodes per patient). Eleven patients had a pN0 status, whereas 41 patients had lymph nodes that were positive for cancer. Five-hundred-twenty (82%) lymph nodes were tumor-free, while 116 (18%) showed metastatic involvement on histopathologic examination. The mean (±SD) diameter of the nonmetastatic nodes was 4.3 mm, whereas infiltrated nodes had a diameter of 5.7 mm (p = 0.001). Seventy-eight (67%) of the infiltrated lymph nodes and 433 (83%) of the nonmetastatic nodes were ≤5 mm in diameter. Of 11 pN0 patients, 5 (45%) patients had at least one lymph node ≥10 mm, in contrast only 12 (29%) out of 41 pN1 patients had one lymph node ≥10 mm.

CONCLUSION

Lymph node size is not a reliable parameter for the evaluation of metastatic involvement in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Diagnostic accuracy of nodal enhancement pattern of rectal cancer at MRI enhanced with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide: findings in pathologically matched mesorectal lymph nodes

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the pattern of nodal enhancement at MRI enhanced with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) in the nodal classification of rectal cancer in pathologically matched mesorectal lymph nodes.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum underwent prospective evaluation with 3-mm axial T2-weighted and USPIO-enhanced T2*-weighted MRI before surgery. Mesorectal nodes visible at in vivo MRI were independently scored by two radiologists as malignant or nonmalignant according to morphologic criteria (irregular nodal contour, heterogeneous signal intensity) on T2-weighted MR images and according to USPIO enhancement pattern on T2*-weighted MR images. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of morphologic and USPIO criteria in identification of malignancy in the pathologically matched mesorectal nodes were compared by use of the McNemar test. Interobserver agreement was compared by use of kappa statistics.

RESULTS

After surgery, radiologic-pathologic comparison of 126 mesorectal nodes (116 benign, 10 malignant) was possible. Use of morphologic criteria resulted in an average sensitivity of 65% (95% CI, 35-88%); specificity, 75% (67-83%); positive predictive value, 19% (8-34%); and negative predictive value, 96% (91-99%). Use of USPIO criteria resulted in an average sensitivity of 65% (95% CI, 35-88%); specificity, 93% (87-96%); positive predictive value, 43% (21-67%); and negative predictive value, 97% (92-99%). Use of USPIO MRI improved diagnostic specificity for both observers (p < 0.01). Interobserver agreement was fair for morphologic criteria (kappa = 0.39) but good for USPIO criteria (kappa = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Use of the pattern of USPIO enhancement had higher diagnostic specificity than but the same sensitivity as morphologic findings in pathologically matched mesorectal lymph nodes.

Submission of the entire lymph node dissection for histologic examination in gynecologic-oncologic specimens. Clinical and pathologic relevance

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lymph node (LN) status in gynecologic malignancies plays an important role in patient staging, management, and prognosis. Therefore, an adequacy of LN harvest is crucial. The aim of this study is to determine whether the submission of the entire LN dissection for histologic examination will affect patients' outcome or clinical stage. We also evaluated the time required and cost-effectiveness for the laboratory.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study of 134 surgical cases from various gynecologic malignancies was conducted. The LN dissection specimen was performed using a conventional manual node dissection method with all the remaining fat being submitted in additional cassettes. One pathologist evaluated (1) the number and status of palpable LNs identified by the conventional method as well as the number of tissue cassettes and (2) the number, size, and status of the non-palpable LNs as well as the number of tissue cassettes.

RESULTS

The palpable LNs ranged from 0 to 36 with average 14.8 LNs per case (Poisson 95% CI: 14.1-15.4). The additional non-palpable LNs ranged from 0 to 16 with an average of 3.1 (Poisson 95% CI: 2.8-3.4). In only one case, a 3-mm non-palpable LN with metastasis was identified; however, it did not affect tumor staging or patient management.

CONCLUSION

The impact on patient outcome is minimal and it does not prove to be cost and time effective when submitting the entire LN dissection specimen in gynecologic malignancies. However, this method could be justified in selective cases in which the manual node dissection does not reveal an adequate number of LNs.

The prognostic impact of the number of lymph nodes retrieved after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess factors associated with the number of nodes retrieved and the impact of the number of lymph nodes in rectal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation with radical surgery.

METHODS

A total of 258 patients were enrolled. Lymph nodes were retrieved from specimens using a manual dissection technique.

RESULTS

Of the 258 patients, nine patients had an absence of lymph nodes (ypNx), 150 patients had a node-negative status (ypN(-)) and 99 patients had node-positive disease (ypN(+)). An advanced ypT classification (ypT3,4) and larger tumor (>4 cm) were associated with an increased number of nodes retrieved. The pretreatment CEA level (>5 ng/ml) and ypN(+) classification were significant risk factors for cancer specific and recurrence free survival. There was no significant difference of oncological outcomes among ypNx patients and a subset of ypN(-) patients based on the number of nodes retrieved using three cutoff values (1-11, 12-25, and 25-65 nodes).

CONCLUSIONS

In a neoadjuvant setting, ypN(+) disease was an independent risk factor for oncological outcomes. An absence of nodes does not represent an inferior oncological outcome. The number of nodes does not seen to impact survival and recurrence in ypN(-) patients.

Preoperative staging and treatment options in T1 rectal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Major rectal resection for T1 rectal cancer offers more than 95% cancer specific five-year survival to patients surviving the first 30 days after surgery. A significant further improvement by development of the surgical technique may not be possible. Improvements in the total survival rate have to come from a more differentiated treatment modality, taking patient and procedure related risk factors into account. Subgroups of patients have operative mortality risks of 10% or more. Operative complications and long-term side effects after rectum resection are frequent and often severe.

RESULTS

Local treatment of T1 cancers combined with close follow-up, early salvage surgery or later radical resection of local recurrences or with chemo-radiation may lead to fewer severe complications and comparable, or even better, long-term survival. Accurate preoperative staging and careful selection of patients for local or non-operative treatment are mandatory. As preoperative staging, at present, is not sufficiently accurate, strategies for completion, salvage or rescue surgery is important, and must be accepted by the patient before local treatment for cure is initiated.

RECOMMENDATIONS

It is recommended that polyps with low-risk T1 cancers should be treated with endoscopic snare resection in case of Haggitt's stage 1 or 2. TEM is recommended if resection margins are uncertain after snare resection for Haggitt's stage 3 and 4, and for sessile and flat, low-risk T1 cancers. Average risk patients with high-risk T1 cancers should be offered rectum resection, but old and comorbid patients with high-risk T1 cancers should be treated individually according to objective criteria as age, physical performance as well as patient's preference. All patients treated for cure with local resection or non-surgical methods should be followed closely.

Carcinoma of the colon: margins of resection

Resection of colonic carcinoma with curative intent must encompass: (1) margins of bowel wall that are wider than the extent of microscopic intramural tumor spread beyond the macroscopic edge of the tumor; (2) lymphatic tissue draining the tumor and possibly containing cancer cells; (3) structures adhering to the tumor and possibly infiltrated by tumor cells. The minimal extent of resection that satisfies these requirements and possible benefits of extending the resection are reviewed.

Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0-Tesla rectal magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative local staging of primary rectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 3.0-T rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative local staging of primary rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients with surgically and pathologically proven primary rectal cancer who underwent preoperative gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced 3.0-T rectal MRI, were enrolled in this retrospective study. Two radiologists, who were blinded to the pathology results, independently reviewed the MR images and recorded their confidence level for determination of perirectal extension, and regional lymph node (LN) involvement using a 5-point scale. The diagnostic accuracy of each reviewer for local staging was calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Interobserver agreement was also calculated using linear weighted kappa statistics.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracy (area under the ROC curve, Az) for determining perirectal extension was for reviewer 1, 0.860 (95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.95) and for reviewer 2, 0.853 (0.71-0.94), respectively. The Az for determination of regional LN involvement was for reviewer 1, 0.902 (0.77-0.97) and for reviewer 2, 0.843 (0.70-0.94), respectively. Interobserver agreement included, respectively, good, and moderate agreement for perirectal extension, and regional LN involvement (kappa = 0.662, and 0.522, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

3.0-T rectal MRI can provide accurate information of perirectal extension and regional LN involvement in the preoperative local staging of primary rectal cancer.