1
|
Brindley PG, Deschamps J, Milovanovic L, Buchanan BM. Are routine chest radiographs still indicated after central line insertion? A scoping review. J Intensive Care Soc 2024; 25:190-207. [PMID: 38737308 PMCID: PMC11086721 DOI: 10.1177/17511437241227739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Central venous catheters are increasingly inserted using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) guidance. Following insertion, it is still common to request a confirmatory chest radiograph for subclavian and internal jugular lines, at least outside of the operating theater. This scoping review addresses: (i) the justification for routine post-insertion radiographs, (ii) whether it would better to use post-insertion POCUS instead, and (iii) the perceived barriers to change. Methods We searched the electronic databases, Ovid MEDLINE (1946-) and Ovid EMBASE (1974-), using the MESH terms ("Echography" OR "Ultrasonography" OR "Ultrasound") AND "Central Venous Catheter" up until February 2023. We also searched clinical practice guidelines, and targeted literature, including cited and citing articles. We included adults (⩾18 years) and English and French language publications. We included randomized control trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, systematic reviews, and surveys. Results Four thousand seventy-one articles were screened, 117 full-text articles accessed, and 41 retained. Thirteen examined cardiac/vascular methods; 5 examined isolated contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; 7 examined isolated rapid atrial swirl sign; and 13 examined combined/integrated methods. In addition, three systematic reviews/meta-analyses and one survey addressed barriers to POCUS adoption. Discussion We believe that the literature supports retiring the routine post-central line chest radiograph. This is not only because POCUS has made line insertion safer, but because POCUS performs at least as well, and is associated with less radiation, lower cost, time savings, and greater accuracy. There has been less written about perceived barriers to change, but the literature shows that these concerns- which include upfront costs, time-to-train, medicolegal concerns and habit- can be challenged and hence overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. G. Brindley
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - J. Deschamps
- Department of Intensive Care and Resuscitation, Integrated Hospital Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - L. Milovanovic
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - B. M. Buchanan
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ablordeppey EA, Keating SM, Brown KM, Theodoro DL, Griffey RT, James AS. Implementation of ultrasound after central venous catheter insertion: A qualitative study in early adopters. J Vasc Access 2023; 24:879-888. [PMID: 34763555 DOI: 10.1177/11297298211053447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The adoption rate of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) for the confirmation of central venous catheter (CVC) positioning and exclusion of post procedure pneumothorax is low despite advantages in workflow compared to traditional chest X-ray (CXR). To explore why, we convened focus groups to address barriers and facilitators of implementation for POCUS guided CVC confirmation and de-implementation of post-procedure CXR. METHODS We conducted focus groups with emergency medicine and critical care providers to discuss current practices in POCUS for CVC confirmation. The semi-structured focus group interview guide was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We performed qualitative content analysis of the resulting transcripts using a consensual qualitative research approach (NVivo software), aiming to identify priority categories that describe the barriers and facilitators of POCUS guided CVC confirmation. RESULTS The coding dictionary of barriers and facilitators consisted of 21 codes from the focus group discussions. Our qualitative analysis revealed that 12 codes emerged spontaneously (inductively) within the focus group discussions and aligned directly to CFIR constructs. Common barriers included provider influences (e.g. knowledge and beliefs about POCUS for CVC confirmation), external network (e.g. societal guidelines, ancillary staff, and consultants), and inertia (habit or reflexive processes). Common facilitators included ultrasound protocol advantage and champions. Time and provider outcomes (cognitive offload, ownership, and independence) emerged as early barriers but late facilitators. CONCLUSION Our qualitative analysis demonstrates real and perceived barriers against implementation of POCUS for CVC position confirmation and pneumothorax exclusion. Our findings discovered organizational and personal constructs that will inform development of multifaceted strategies toward implementation of POCUS after CVC insertion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enyo A Ablordeppey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Shannon M Keating
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Katherine M Brown
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Daniel L Theodoro
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Richard T Griffey
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Aimee S James
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
D'Arrigo S, Annetta MG, Pittiruti M. An ultrasound-based technique in the management of totally implantable venous access devices with persistent withdrawal occlusion. J Vasc Access 2023; 24:140-144. [PMID: 34096379 DOI: 10.1177/11297298211023275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Persistent withdrawal occlusion is a specific catheter malfunction characterized by inability to withdraw blood through the device while infusion is maintained. The main causes are fibroblastic sleeve and tip malposition (associated or not to venous thrombosis around the tip). All current guidelines recommend infusing vesicant/antiblastic drugs through a central venous port only after assessment of blood return. In PWO, blood return is impossible. We have recently started to assess the intravascular position of the tip and the delivery of the infusion in the proximity of the cavo-atrial junction utilizing transthoracic/subxiphoid ultrasound with the 'bubble test'. We found that this is an easy, real-time, accurate and safe method for verifying the possibility of using a port for chemotherapy even in the absence of blood return, as it occurs with persistent withdrawal occlusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia D'Arrigo
- Deptartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Giuseppina Annetta
- Deptartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Pittiruti
- Deptartment of Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ablordeppey E, Koenig A, Barker A, Hernandez E, Simkovich S, Krings J, Brown D, Griffey R. Economic Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Confirmation vs Chest Radiography in Critically Ill Patients: A Labor Cost Model. West J Emerg Med 2022; 23:760-768. [PMID: 36205669 PMCID: PMC9541994 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2022.7.56501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Despite evidence suggesting that point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is faster and non-inferior for confirming position and excluding pneumothorax after central venous catheter (CVC) placement compared to traditional radiography, millions of chest radiographs (CXR) are performed annually for this purpose. Whether the use of POCUS results in cost savings compared to CXR is less clear but could represent a relative advantage in implementation efforts. Our objective in this study was to evaluate the labor cost difference for POCUS-guided vs CXR-guided CVC position confirmation practices.
Methods: We developed a model to evaluate the per patient difference in labor cost between POCUS-guided vs CXR-guided CVC confirmation at our local urban, tertiary academic institution. We used internal cost data from our institution to populate the variables in our model.
Results: The estimated labor cost per patient was $18.48 using CXR compared to $14.66 for POCUS, resulting in a net direct cost savings of $3.82 (21%) per patient using POCUS for CVC confirmation.
Conclusion: In this study comparing the labor costs of two approaches for CVC confirmation, the more efficient alternative (POCUS-guided) is not more expensive than traditional CXR. Performing an economic analysis framed in terms of labor costs and work efficiency may influence stakeholders and facilitate earlier adoption of POCUS for CVC confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enyo Ablordeppey
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, St. Louis, Missouri; Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Adam Koenig
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Abigail Barker
- Washington University, Center for Health Economics and Policy at the Institute for Public Health, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Emily Hernandez
- Washington University, Center for Health Economics and Policy at the Institute for Public Health, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Suzanne Simkovich
- Medstar Health Research Institute, Division of Healthcare Delivery Research, Hyattsville, Maryland; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - James Krings
- Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Derek Brown
- Washington University in St. Louis, Brown School, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Richard Griffey
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Michels G, Horn R, Helfen A, Hagendorff A, Jung C, Hoffmann B, Jaspers N, Kinkel H, Greim CA, Knebel F, Bauersachs J, Busch HJ, Kiefl D, Spiel AO, Marx G, Dietrich CF. Standardisierte Kontrastmittelsonographie (CEUS) in der klinischen Akut- und Notfallmedizin sowie Intensivmedizin (CEUS-Akut). DER KARDIOLOGE 2022; 16:160-163. [DOI: 10.1007/s12181-022-00531-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
|
6
|
Guo NN, Wang HL, Zhao MY, Li JG, Liu HT, Zhang TX, Zhang XY, Chu YJ, Yu KJ, Wang CS. Management of procedural pain in the intensive care unit. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:1473-1484. [PMID: 35211585 PMCID: PMC8855268 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i5.1473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pain is a common experience for inpatients, and intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergo more pain than other departmental patients, with an incidence of 50% at rest and up to 80% during common care procedures. At present, the management of persistent pain in ICU patients has attracted considerable attention, and there are many related clinical studies and guidelines. However, the management of transient pain caused by certain ICU procedures has not received sufficient attention. We reviewed the different management strategies for procedural pain in the ICU and reached a conclusion. Pain management is a process of continuous quality improvement that requires multidisciplinary team cooperation, pain-related training of all relevant personnel, effective relief of all kinds of pain, and improvement of patients' quality of life. In clinical work, which involves complex and diverse patients, we should pay attention to the following points for procedural pain: (1) Consider not only the patient's persistent pain but also his or her procedural pain; (2) Conduct multimodal pain management; (3) Provide combined sedation on the basis of pain management; and (4) Perform individualized pain management. Until now, the pain management of procedural pain in the ICU has not attracted extensive attention. Therefore, we expect additional studies to solve the existing problems of procedural pain management in the ICU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na-Na Guo
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Hong-Liang Wang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Ming-Yan Zhao
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Jian-Guo Li
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, Hubei Province, China
| | - Hai-Tao Liu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Ting-Xin Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Xin-Yu Zhang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Yi-Jun Chu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Kai-Jiang Yu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Chang-Song Wang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Michels G, Horn R, Helfen A, Hagendorff A, Jung C, Hoffmann B, Jaspers N, Kinkel H, Greim CA, Knebel F, Bauersachs J, Busch HJ, Kiefl D, Spiel AO, Marx G, Dietrich CF. [Standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in clinical acute and emergency medicine as well as critical care (CEUS Acute) : Consensus statement of the DGIIN, DIVI, DGINA, DGAI, DGK, ÖGUM, SGUM und DEGUM]. Anaesthesist 2022; 71:307-310. [PMID: 35142877 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-021-01080-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Michels
- Klinik für Akut- und Notfallmedizin, St.-Antonius-Hospital gGmbH, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen, Dechant-Deckers-Str. 8, 52249, Eschweiler, Deutschland.
| | - Rudolf Horn
- Notfallmedizin, Center da sandà Val Müstair, Sta. Maria, Schweiz
| | - Andreas Helfen
- Medizinische Klinik I, Katholisches Klinikum Lünen Werne GmbH, St.-Marien-Hospital Lünen, Lünen, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Hagendorff
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Christian Jung
- Klinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie und Angiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - Beatrice Hoffmann
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Natalie Jaspers
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Horst Kinkel
- Praxis für Gastroenterologie, Düren, Deutschland
| | - Clemens-Alexander Greim
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin, Klinikum Fulda, Pacelliallee 4, 36043, Fulda, Deutschland
| | - Fabian Knebel
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II: Schwerpunkt Kardiologie, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Johann Bauersachs
- Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Hans-Jörg Busch
- Universitätsklinikum, Universitäts-Notfallzentrum, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - Daniel Kiefl
- Klinik für Interdisziplinäre Notfallmedizin, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach am Main, Deutschland
| | - Alexander O Spiel
- Klinik Ottakring, Zentrale Notaufnahme, Wiener Gesundheitsverbund, Wien, Österreich
| | - Gernot Marx
- Klinik für operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Christoph F Dietrich
- Department für Allgemeine Innere Medizin DAIM, Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Schänzlihalde 11, 3013, Bern, Schweiz.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ablordeppey EA, Powell B, McKay V, Keating S, James A, Carpenter C, Kollef M, Griffey R. Protocol for DRAUP: a deimplementation programme to decrease routine chest radiographs after central venous catheter insertion. BMJ Open Qual 2021; 10:bmjoq-2020-001222. [PMID: 34663588 PMCID: PMC8524291 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Avoiding low value medical practices is an important focus in current healthcare utilisation. Despite advantages of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) over chest X-ray including improved workflow and timeliness of results, POCUS-guided central venous catheter (CVC) position confirmation has slow rate of adoption. This demonstrates a gap that is ripe for the development of an intervention. Methods The intervention is a deimplementation programme called DRAUP (deimplementation of routine chest radiographs after adoption of ultrasound-guided insertion and confirmation of central venous catheter protocol) that will be created to address one unnecessary imaging modality in the acute care environment. We propose a three-phase approach to changing low-value practices. In phase 1, we will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework to explore barriers and facilitators of POCUS for CVC confirmation in a single centre, large tertiary, academic hospital via focus groups. The qualitative methods will inform the development and adaptation of strategies that address identified determinants of change. In phase 2, the multifaceted strategies will be conceptualised using Morgan’s framework for understanding and reducing medical overuse. In phase 3, we will locally implement these strategies and assess them using Proctor’s outcomes (adoption, deadoption, fidelity and penetration) in an observational study to demonstrate proof of concept, gaining valuable insights on the programme. Secondary outcomes will include POCUS-guided CVC confirmation efficacy measured by time and effectiveness measured by sensitivity and specificity of POCUS confirmation after CVC insertion. With limited data available to inform interventions that use concurrent implementation and deimplementation strategies to substitute chest X-ray for POCUS using the DRAUP programme, we propose that this primary implementation and secondary effectiveness pilot study will provide novel data that will expand the knowledge of implementation approaches to replacing low value or unnecessary care in acute care environments. Ethics and dissemination Approval of the study by the Human Research Protection Office has been obtained. This work will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts, presentation in abstract form at scientific meetings and data sharing with other investigators through academically established means. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT04324762, registered on 27 March 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enyo A Ablordeppey
- Department of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Byron Powell
- Brown School at Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Virginia McKay
- Brown School at Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Shannon Keating
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Aimee James
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Christopher Carpenter
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Marin Kollef
- Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Richard Griffey
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ablordeppey EA, Drewry AM, Anderson AL, Casali D, Wallace LA, Kane DS, Tian L, House SL, Fuller BM, Griffey RT, Theodoro DL. Point-of-care Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Confirmation in Ultrasound Nonexperts. AEM EDUCATION AND TRAINING 2021; 5:e10530. [PMID: 34124497 PMCID: PMC8173448 DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Emerging evidence suggests that chest radiography (CXR) following central venous catheter (CVC) placement is unnecessary when point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is used to confirm catheter position and exclude pneumothorax. However, few providers have adopted this practice, and it is unknown what contributing factors may play a role in this lack of adoption, such as ultrasound experience. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS to confirm CVC position and exclude a pneumothorax after brief education and training of nonexperts. METHODS We performed a prospective cohort study in a single academic medical center to determine the diagnostic characteristics of a POCUS-guided CVC confirmation protocol after brief training performed by POCUS nonexperts. POCUS nonexperts (emergency medicine senior residents and critical care fellows) independently performed a POCUS-guided CVC confirmation protocol after a 30-minute didactic training. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of the POCUS-guided CVC confirmation protocol for malposition and pneumothorax detection. Secondary outcomes were efficiency and feasibility of adequate image acquisition, adjudicated by POCUS experts. RESULTS Twenty-six POCUS nonexperts collected data on 190 patients in the final analysis. There were five (2.5%) CVC malpositions and six (3%) pneumothoraxes on CXR. The positive likelihood ratios of POCUS for malposition detection and pneumothorax were 12.33 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.26 to 46.69) and 3.41 (95% CI = 0.51 to 22.76), respectively. The accuracy of POCUS for pneumothorax detection compared to CXR was 0.93 (95% CI = 0.88 to 0.96) and the sensitivity was 0.17 (95% CI = 0.00 to 0.64). The median (interquartile range) time for CVC confirmation was lower for POCUS (9 minutes [8.5-9.5 minutes]) compared to CXR (29 minutes [1-269 minutes]; Mann-Whitney U, p < 0.01). Adequate protocol image acquisition was achieved in 76% of the patients. CONCLUSION Thirty-minute training of POCUS in nonexperts demonstrates adequate diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and feasibility of POCUS-guided CVC position confirmation, but not exclusion of pneumothorax.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enyo A. Ablordeppey
- From theDepartment of AnesthesiologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMOUSA
- theDepartment of Emergency MedicineWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMOUSA
| | - Anne M. Drewry
- From theDepartment of AnesthesiologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMOUSA
| | - Adam L. Anderson
- theDepartment of Internal MedicineWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMOUSA
| | - Diego Casali
- and theDepartment of SurgeryWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMOUSA
- and theDepartment of SurgeryDivision of Cardiothoracic SurgeryCedars Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Laura A. Wallace
- theDepartment of Emergency MedicineWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMOUSA
| | - Deborah S. Kane
- theDepartment of Emergency MedicineWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMOUSA
| | - LinLin Tian
- theDepartment of Emergency MedicineWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMOUSA
| | - Stacey L. House
- theDepartment of Emergency MedicineWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMOUSA
| | - Brian M. Fuller
- From theDepartment of AnesthesiologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMOUSA
- theDepartment of Emergency MedicineWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMOUSA
| | - Richard T. Griffey
- theDepartment of Emergency MedicineWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMOUSA
| | - Daniel L. Theodoro
- theDepartment of Emergency MedicineWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMOUSA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cahill AM, Escobar F, Acord MR. Central venous catheter fracture leading to TPN extravasation and abdominal compartment syndrome diagnosed with bedside contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Pediatr Radiol 2021; 51:307-310. [PMID: 32889586 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-020-04825-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Central venous lines may require contrast injection under fluoroscopy to evaluate for dysfunction such as occlusion, fibrin sheath development or catheter fracture. Rarely, some patients may be too ill to travel to the interventional radiology suite for this examination. We present a case utilizing contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) at the bedside to assess catheter integrity in a critically ill infant with a large intra-abdominal fluid collection. CEUS demonstrated extravasation into the collection, confirming catheter fracture and prompting immediate cessation of line use and recommendation for exchange. This case shows the utility of CEUS to evaluate central venous access devices in children who are unable to travel to interventional radiology for a standard contrast injection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Marie Cahill
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Fernando Escobar
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Michael R Acord
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tozer J, Vitto MJ, Joyce M, Taylor L, Evans DP. Central Venous Catheter Confirmation by Ultrasonography: A Novel Instructional Protocol. South Med J 2020; 113:614-617. [PMID: 33263128 DOI: 10.14423/smj.0000000000001187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Ultrasound (US)-only confirmation of central venous catheter (CVC) placement has proven to be accurate and fast when compared with the current standard chest radiograph. This procedure depends on the detection of appropriately timed atrial bubbles during central line flushing, called the rapid atrial swirl sign (RASS). The most obvious barrier to increasing the use of this technique is appropriate education and training; therefore, we proposed a novel educational approach to training emergency department (ED) physicians in the confirmation of CVC location using US and then tested its effectiveness. METHODS Using an online educational model, participants were taught the background and procedural steps to confirm CVC placement using US. Subsequently, they were asked to use this knowledge to place central lines in simulation and confirm them using US. They were tested with various scenarios, including correctly and incorrectly placed lines. Their accuracy was measured, and a survey was used to assess their satisfaction with the training and applicability to practice. RESULTS A total of 47 ED physicians completed the online training module and 24 completed the simulation testing that followed. Results showed 100% accuracy in detecting appropriately timed RASS (<2 seconds), delayed RASS (>2 seconds), and no RASS in simulation. All of the participants "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the didactic and simulation sessions improved their understanding of US confirmation of central line placement. CONCLUSIONS The use of US to confirm central line placement can be effectively taught to ED physicians using short didactic and simulation-based training. This is a reasonable approach to integrate this protocol into practice, and allow for more widespread use of this emerging technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Tozer
- From the Division of Ultrasound, Department of Emergency Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
| | - Michael J Vitto
- From the Division of Ultrasound, Department of Emergency Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
| | - Michael Joyce
- From the Division of Ultrasound, Department of Emergency Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
| | - Lindsay Taylor
- From the Division of Ultrasound, Department of Emergency Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
| | - David P Evans
- From the Division of Ultrasound, Department of Emergency Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Current Practices in Central Venous Catheter Position Confirmation by Point of Care Ultrasound: A Survey of Early Adopters. Shock 2020; 51:613-618. [PMID: 30052580 DOI: 10.1097/shk.0000000000001218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although routine chest radiographs (CXR) to verify correct central venous catheter (CVC) position and exclude pneumothorax are commonly performed, emerging evidence suggests that this practice can be replaced by point of care ultrasound (POCUS). POCUS is advantageous over CXR because it avoids radiation while verifying correct placement and lack of pneumothorax without delay. We hypothesize that a knowledge translation gap exists in this area. We aim to describe the current clinical practice regarding POCUS alone for CVC position confirmation and pneumothorax exclusion as compared with chest radiography. METHODS We used a modified Dillman technique to conduct a brief web-based survey to Critical Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine physicians (targeted group of early adopters) evaluating the current practice related to CVC position confirmation and PTX exclusion via CXR or POCUS. RESULTS Of 200 post-training clinicians contacted, 136 (68%) responded to the survey. For routine CVC confirmation and PTX evaluation, 50.7% of Critical Care Medicine physicians and 65.4% of Emergency Medicine physicians reported using CXR alone while 49.3% and 33.1% respectively reported using CXR and ultrasound together. Though 84.6% of clinicians use ultrasound for CVC insertion "most of the time" or "always," none use ultrasound alone for CVC position confirmation, and only 1% has used ultrasound alone for PTX exclusion. CONCLUSIONS Though data support its utility and advantages for POCUS as a sole modality for CVC position confirmation and PTX evaluation, POCUS is rarely used for this indication. We identified several perceived barriers toward widespread utilization suggesting areas for dissemination and implementation strategy development that will benefit patient care practices.
Collapse
|
13
|
Preparedness Tested: Severe Cerebral Malaria Presenting as a High-Risk Person Under Investigation for Ebola Virus Disease at a US Hospital. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2020; 15:528-533. [PMID: 32381125 DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2020.53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
In 2019, a 42-year-old African man who works as an Ebola virus disease (EVD) researcher traveled from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), near an ongoing EVD epidemic, to Philadelphia and presented to the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Emergency Department with altered mental status, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever. He was classified as a "wet" person under investigation for EVD, and his arrival activated our hospital emergency management command center and bioresponse teams. He was found to be in septic shock with multisystem organ dysfunction, including circulatory dysfunction, encephalopathy, metabolic lactic acidosis, acute kidney injury, acute liver injury, and diffuse intravascular coagulation. Critical care was delivered within high-risk pathogen isolation in the ED and in our Special Treatment Unit until a diagnosis of severe cerebral malaria was confirmed and EVD was definitively excluded.This report discusses our experience activating a longitudinal preparedness program designed for rare, resource-intensive events at hospitals physically remote from any active epidemic but serving a high-volume international air travel port-of-entry.
Collapse
|
14
|
Tran QK, Foster M, Bowler J, Lancaster M, Tchai J, Andersen K, Matta A, Haase DJ. Emergency and critical care providers' perception about the use of bedside ultrasound for confirmation of above-diaphragm central venous catheter placement. Heliyon 2020; 6:e03113. [PMID: 32042935 PMCID: PMC7002808 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2019] [Revised: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Chest radiography (CXR) is commonly used to confirm the proper placement of above-diaphragm central venous catheters (CVCs) and to detect associated complications. Recent studies have shown that point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has better sensitivity and is faster than CXR for these purposes. We were interested in documenting how often emergency medicine and critical care practitioners perform POCUS to confirm proper CVC positioning as well as their confidence in performing it. Methods We surveyed members of our state's chapters of the College of Emergency Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine between April and December 2018. Our primary outcome was the percentage of providers who would agree to perform only POCUS, forgoing CXR, for confirmation of CVC position. We performed multivariable logistic regressions to measure associations between demographic, clinical information, and outcomes. Results One hundred thirty-six providers participated (a 25% participation rate). Their specialties were as follows: emergency medicine, 75%; critical care, 13%; and emergency medicine/critical care, 11%. Thirty-one percent would use POCUS only for CVC confirmation, while 42% were confident in performing POCUS for this purpose. Multivariable logistic regressions showed that performing more non-procedural ultrasound examinations was associated with a higher likelihood of agreeing to perform POCUS only (OR, 2.9; 95% CI: 1.3-6.3). Forty-six percent of relevant comments suggested more training to increase the use of POCUS. Conclusion Participants in this study did not frequently use POCUS for CVC confirmation. Designers of training curricula should consider including more instruction in the use of POCUS to confirm proper CVC placement and to detect complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quincy K Tran
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,University of Maryland School of Medicine, The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mark Foster
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Justin Bowler
- University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Mia Lancaster
- University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Tchai
- University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Katie Andersen
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.,University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ann Matta
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.,University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel J Haase
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ultrasonographic Detection of Micro-Bubbles in the Right Atrium to Confirm Peripheral Venous Catheter Position in Children. Crit Care Med 2019; 47:e836-e840. [DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
16
|
Ultrasound-guided vascular access in critical illness. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45:434-446. [PMID: 30778648 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05564-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Over the past two decades, ultrasound (US) has become widely accepted to guide safe and accurate insertion of vascular devices in critically ill patients. We emphasize central venous catheter insertion, given its broad application in critically ill patients, but also review the use of US for accessing peripheral veins, arteries, the medullary canal, and vessels for institution of extracorporeal life support. To ensure procedural safety and high cannulation success rates we recommend using a systematic protocolized approach for US-guided vascular access in elective clinical situations. A standardized approach minimizes variability in clinical practice, provides a framework for education and training, facilitates implementation, and enables quality analysis. This review will address the state of US-guided vascular access, including current practice and future directions.
Collapse
|
17
|
Kummer T, Oh L, Phelan MB, Huang RD, Nomura JT, Adhikari S. Emergency and critical care applications for contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Am J Emerg Med 2018; 36:1287-1294. [PMID: 29716799 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.04.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using intravascular microbubbles has potential to revolutionize point-of-care ultrasonography by expanding the use of ultrasonography into clinical scenarios previously reserved for computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, or angiography. METHODS We performed a literature search and report clinical experience to provide an introduction to CEUS and describe its current applications for point-of-care indications. RESULTS The uses of CEUS include several applications highly relevant for emergency medicine, such as solid-organ injuries, actively bleeding hematomas, or abdominal aortic aneurysms. Compared with CT as the preeminent advanced imaging modality in the emergency department, CEUS is low cost, radiation sparing, repeatable, and readily available. It does not require sedation, preprocedural laboratory assessment, or transportation to the radiology suite. CONCLUSIONS CEUS is a promising imaging technique for point-of-care applications in pediatric and adult patients and can be applied for patients with allergy to CT contrast medium or with impaired renal function. More high-quality CEUS research focusing on accuracy, patient safety, health care costs, and throughput times is needed to validate its use in emergency and critical care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Kummer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
| | - Laura Oh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Mary Beth Phelan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Robert D Huang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Jason T Nomura
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, United States
| | - Srikar Adhikari
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|