Resource utilization in primary repair of cleft palate

A retrospective analysis of speech and hearing in patients receiving surgery for submucous cleft palate

Submucous cleft palate (SMCP) is an uncommon subtype of cleft palate that is associated with symptoms of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), the most common being hypernasal speech. A high proportion of patients also suffer from conductive hearing loss, which is thought to be due to eustachian tube dysfunction. A number of surgical techniques have been proposed to correct the anatomical defect that is responsible for VPI. This exploratory study aims to describe surgical techniques and clinical outcomes in a series of patients who underwent surgical repair of SMCP at a single regional specialist cleft centre between 1999 and 2018. Through a retrospective case note review, records of 57 patients who underwent SMCP repair between the ages of 6 months and 16 years were examined. Patients underwent one of the three surgical techniques: Intravelar Veloplasty, Furlow or a novel technique we have termed as "Hemi-Furlow". Hypernasality, measured on the Great Ormond Street Speech Assessment, showed evidence of improvement post-operatively in all three surgical groups (P<0.005), with no evidence to favour any specific approach. Post-operative complications, including wound dehiscence and fistulae, occurred in nine patients (15.8%). Nine patients (15.8%) required revisional surgery, either due to post-operative complications or persistent speech problems. Otological disease was present in 54.4% of patients, comprising conductive hearing loss due to otitis media with effusion (52.6%) and sensorineural hearing loss (1.8%). There is now a need for large, multi-centre studies with robust outcomes measures to further examine relationships between surgical techniques and clinical outcomes in people born with SMCP.

A Challenging Period After Repair: Etiology and Follow-Up Rates of the Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate in Intensive Care Unit

ABSTRACT

The perioperative period is quite challenging because of the featured anatomical and clinical properties of the babies with cleft lip and palate (CLP). Therefore follow-up in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a crucial parameter for managing these patients. Although various studies in cleft literature, limited studies have analyzed the ICU admission rate and its etiology in the cleft population. At this point, the present study aims to reveal the etiology and rate of ICU admission of babies with an orofacial cleft to contribute to taking preventive precautions.The rate of primary CLP patients was 69.5% (937 of 1348 patients). Intensive care unit admission rate of primary CLP patients was 6.2% (n = 58). The expected and unexpected ICU admission rate was 4.8% and 1.4%, respectively. Of the patients admitted to the ICU, 53.4% (n = 31) were boys and 46.6% (n = 27) were girls. There was no statistically significant association between gender and ICU admission (P = 0.896). However, the association between cleft type and ICU follow-up was statistically significant (P < 0.001).The findings of the present study reveal the high ICU admission rate of cleft patients within all patients admitted to ICU. Due to many unique statuses of cleft babies, attentive assessment in the preoperative period and determining the postoperative need for ICU follow-up would contribute to preventing postoperative complications.

Race, Income, and the Timeliness of Cleft Palate Repair in the United States

Objective To determine if differences exist in the timing of cleft palate repair with respect to sex, race, income, and geographical location within the United States. Design Retrospective cross-sectional study using the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) from 1997 to 2009. Setting Inpatient. Patients Children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip undergoing inpatient cleft palate repair. Main outcome measures Age at the time of palatoplasty (in months) by sex, race, income quartile, and geographic location. Results A total of 7,218 children with cleft palate underwent repair at a mean age of 12.1 months (95% CI 12.0-12.3). Females underwent palatoplasty at an older age (13.6 months) than males (13.2 months), a difference of 0.47 months (SE: 0.19, p=0.015). White children underwent surgery at an earlier age (12.1 months) than Black (12.9 months) (difference: 0.73 months, SE: 0.37, p=0.045), Hispanic (12.7 months) (difference: 0.57 months, SE 0.25, p=0.025), and Asian children (15.7 months) (difference: 3.60 months, SE 0.49, p<0.0001). Asian children were also found to undergo repair later than Hispanic (difference 3.03 months, SE 0.51, p<0.0001) and Black (difference: 2.87 months, SE 0.59, p<0.0001) children. Patients born into the highest income brackets were repaired 0.75 months earlier than those in the lowest bracket (SE: 0.26, p=0.005). Patients in the Midwest underwent palatoplasty later (14.3 months) than in the Northeast (12.9 months) (difference: 1.36 months, SE: 0.31, p<0.0001), South (13.2 months) (difference: 1.05 months, SE: 0.36, p=0.004), and West (13.2 months) (difference: 1.09 months, SE: 0.32, p=0.0007). Conclusions After controlling for confounding factors, our results suggest that in recent history, Black, Hispanic, and Asian children with cleft palate were repaired later than their White counterparts. In addition, children of affluent families were repaired earliest, and economically disadvantaged children were repaired later than their peers.

Variation in the Desire for Cleft Revision Surgery among Children, Caregivers, and Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Although revision surgery is part of the reconstructive process for children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate, the indications for revision vary, and the extent to which surgeons and families agree on appearance is unclear. The authors sought to understand the extent to which children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate, surgeons, caregivers, and control observers agree on satisfaction with appearance and the desire for revision.

METHODS

Children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate (n = 100) and their caregivers (n = 100) were surveyed regarding satisfaction with appearance using the Cleft Evaluation Profile. Surgeons (n = 10) and control observers (n = 10) rated photographs of these children using questions analogous to the Cleft Evaluation Profile. General linear model repeated measures analysis of variance were used to detect significant differences between raters, with an alpha of 0.05.

RESULTS

The children reported greater satisfaction with appearance across all domains compared with surgeons (nose, 7.77 versus 5.51, p < 0.001; lip, 7.94 versus 5.90, p < 0.001; maxilla, 8.16 versus 6.56, p < 0.001) and general observers (nose, 7.78 versus 6.00, p < 0.001; lip, 7.80 versus 6.12, p < 0.001; maxilla, 8.16 versus 7.40, p < 0.001). Children and caregivers expressed similar degrees of satisfaction with appearance of the lip (5.48 ± 1.69 versus 5.6 ± 1.49, p > 0.5) and maxilla (6.08 ± 1.1 versus 5.8 ± 1.2, p = 0.07). There was no significant relationship between children and surgeons in terms of the desire for revision surgery (p = 0.44).

CONCLUSIONS

All groups expressed differing levels of satisfaction with cleft-specific aspects of appearance. Importantly, children were more satisfied than all other groups. Care must be taken to evaluate perceptions of all stakeholders before moving forward with cleft revision surgery.

Incidence of Speech-Correcting Surgery in Children With Isolated Cleft Palate

Objective:

Speech-correcting surgeries (pharyngoplasty) are performed to correct velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). This study aimed to analyze the need for speech-correcting surgery in children with isolated cleft palate (ICP) and to determine differences among cleft extent, gender, and primary technique used. In addition, we assessed the timing and number of secondary procedures performed and the incidence of operated fistulas.

Design:

Retrospective medical chart review study from hospital archives and electronic records.

Participants:

These comprised the 423 consecutive nonsyndromic children (157 males and 266 females) with ICP treated at the Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Center of Helsinki University Hospital during 1990 to 2016.

Results:

The total incidence of VPI surgery was 33.3% and the fistula repair rate, 7.8%. Children with cleft of both the hard and soft palate (n = 300) had a VPI secondary surgery rate of 37.3% (fistula repair rate 10.7%), whereas children with only cleft of the soft palate (n = 123) had a corresponding rate of 23.6% (fistula repair rate 0.8%). Gender and primary palatoplasty technique were not considered significant factors in need for VPI surgery. The majority of VPI surgeries were performed before school age. One fifth of patients receiving speech-correcting surgery had more than one subsequent procedure.

Conclusion:

The need for speech-correcting surgery and fistula repair was related to the severity of the cleft. Although the majority of the corrective surgeries were done before the age of 7 years, a considerable number were performed at a later stage, necessitating long-term observation.

Predicting Adverse Perioperative Events in Patients Undergoing Primary Cleft Palate Repair

Objective:

This study aimed to identify risk factors for adverse perioperative events (APEs) after cleft palatoplasty to develop an individualized risk assessment tool.

Design:

Retrospective cohort.

Setting:

Tertiary institutional.

Patients:

Patients younger than 2 years with cleft palate. Interventions: Primary Furlow palatoplasty between 2008 and 2011.

Main Outcome Measure(s):

Adverse perioperative event, defined as laryngo- or bronchospasm, accidental extubation, reintubation, obstruction, hypoxia, or unplanned intensive care unit admission.

Results:

Three hundred patients averaging 12.3 months old were included. Cleft distribution included submucous, 1%; Veau 1, 17.3%; Veau 2, 38.3%; Veau 3, 30.3%; and Veau 4, 13.0%. Pierre Robin (n = 43) was the most prevalent syndrome/anomaly. Eighty-three percent of patients received reversal of neuromuscular blockade, and total morphine equivalent narcotic dose averaged 0.19 mg/kg. Sixty-nine patients (23.0%) had an APE, most commonly hypoventilation (10%) and airway obstruction (8%). Other APEs included reintubation (4.7%) and laryngobronchospasm (3.3%). APE was associated with multiple intubation attempts (odds ratio [OR] = 6.6, P = .001), structural or functional airway anomaly (OR = 4.5, P < .001), operation >160 minutes (OR = 2.2, P = .04), narcotic dose >0.3 mg/kg (OR = 2.3, P = .03), inexperienced provider (OR = 2.1, P = .02), and no paralytic reversal administration (OR = 2.0, P = .049); weight between 9 and 13 kg was protective (OR = 0.5, P = .04). Patients were risk-stratified according to individual profiles as low, average, high, or extreme risk (APE 2.5%-91.7%) with excellent risk discrimination (C-statistic = 0.79).

Conclusions:

APE incidence was 23.0% after palatoplasty, with a 37-fold higher incidence in extreme-risk patients. Individualized risk assessment tools may enhance perioperative clinical decision making to mitigate complications.

Big data in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery: from large databases to registries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There are many limitations to performing clinical research with high levels of evidence in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS), such as randomization into surgical groups and sample size recruitment. Therefore, additional avenues for exploring research should be explored using big data, from databases to registries. Other organizations have developed these tools in the evolving landscape of outcomes measurement and value in healthcare, which may serve as models for our specialty.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last 5 years, FPRS literature of large-scale outcomes research, utilizing several administrative databases, has steadily grown. Our objectives are to describe key administrative databases, strengths and weaknesses of each, and identify recent FPRS publications utilizing big data. A registry with FPRS defined outcomes has the most potential.

SUMMARY

Although FPRS research has trended to a more evidence-based approach in the modern healthcare era, gaps persist. Several large administrative databases or registries can address voids in outcomes research within FPRS.

National Estimates of and Risk Factors for Inpatient Revision Surgeries for Orofacial Clefts

Objective

To provide national estimates of the number and cost of primary and revision cleft lip and palate surgeries in the U.S. and to determine patient and hospital characteristics associated with disproportionate use of revision surgery.

Design

Retrospective cross-sectional study using data obtained from the 2003, 2006, and 2009 Kids’ Inpatient Database.

Setting

Inpatient.

Patients

Children with CL, CP, or CLP undergoing inpatient cleft lip and/or palate surgery.

Interventions

Inpatient cleft lip and/or palate surgery.

Main Outcome Measures

Orofacial cleft surgery estimates, estimates of primary versus revision surgeries, and estimated inflation-adjusted hospitalization costs.

Results

In 2009, there were a total of 2824 and 5431 hospitalizations for cleft lip and palate surgeries, respectively. Revision surgery accounted for 24.2% of cleft lip surgeries and 36.8% of cleft palate surgeries. Children with CLP (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.48-2.38), a syndromic diagnosis (OR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.16-1.87), or private insurance (OR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.41-2.09) were more likely to undergo cleft lip revision surgery. Similar risk factors were found for children undergoing cleft palate revision. Mean cost per hospitalization ranged from $7564 to $8393 in 2009, depending on surgery type, and did not change significantly (in 2009 U.S. $) between 2003 and 2009.

Conclusions

Interventions to reduce revision surgery by improving results of primary surgery should be targeted in the population of identified high-risk (e.g., syndromic) patients. In addition, the association of health insurance status with revision surgery highlights the need to understand and address the impact of economic disparities on cleft care delivery.

An Assessment of 30-Day Complications in Primary Cleft Palate Repair: A Review of the 2012 ACS NSQIP Pediatric

Objective

This study uses the American College of Surgeons Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP Pediatric), a multicenter database, to identify risk factors for complications after cleft palate repair.

Design

Patients undergoing Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes 42200 and 42205 were extracted from the 2012 ACS NSQIP Pediatric. Patients older than 36 months or those who had undergone an additional surgery that altered the risk were excluded. Outcome variables were combined to create a complication variable. Fisher's exact, Pearson chi-square, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for analysis.

Results

Eligibility criteria were met by 751 patients. Of these, 192 (25.6%) had unilateral clefts, 146 (19.4%) bilateral, and 413 (55.0%) were unspecified. The average age at time of surgery for those without and with complications was 421.1 ± 184.8 and 433.6 ± 168.0 days, respectively ( P = .76). Of the 21 (2.8%) patients with complications, respiratory complications were the most common. Risk factors associated with complications included American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of 3 ( P = .003), nutritional support ( P = .013), esophageal/gastric/intestinal disease ( P = .016), oxygen support ( P = .003), structural pulmonary/airway abnormality ( P = .011), and impaired cognitive status ( P = .009). Patients undergoing concurrent laryngoscopy ( P = .048) or other surgeries ( P = .047) were also found to be associated with increased complications. The 30-day fistula rate was 0.5%, and the readmission rate was 1.9%.

Conclusion

Perioperative complications for primary palatoplasty were 2.8% according to the ACS NSQIP Pediatric. Preoperative patient-related factors as well as concurrent surgeries may affect 30-day complication rates. These results help target those at greater risk for complications and allow for appropriate interventions to mitigate risks.