Margin mapping in transoral surgery for head and neck cancer

What's behind Margin Status in Oral Cancer?

In the 2nd century AD, Galen argued that the failure to remove any single 'root' of a malignant tumor could result in a local relapse. After nearly 2 millennia, this problem appears to be even more challenging due to our increased understanding of the complexity of tumor formation and spread. Pathological analysis of tumor margins under a microscope remains the primary and only accepted method for confirming the complete tumor removal. However, this method is not an all-or-nothing test, and it can be compromised by various intrinsic and extrinsic limitations. Among the intrinsic limitations of pathological analysis we recall the pathologist handling, tissue shrinkage, the detection of minimal residual disease and the persistence of a precancerous field. Extrinsic limitations relate to surgical tools and their thermal damage, the different kinds of surgical resections and frozen sections collection. Surgeons, as well as oncologists and radiotherapists, should be well aware of and deeply understand these limitations to avoid misinterpretation of margin status, which can have serious consequences. Meanwhile, new technologies such as Narrow band imaging have shown promising results in assisting with the achievement of clear superficial resection margins. More recently, emerging techniques like Raman spectroscopy and near-infrared fluorescence have shown potential as real-time guides for surgical resection. The aim of this narrative review is to provide valuable insights into the complex process of margin analysis and underscore the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration between pathologists, surgeons, oncologists, and radiotherapists to optimize patient outcomes in oral cancer surgery.

Trends and Future Directions in Margin Analysis for Head and Neck Cancers

Margin status in head and neck cancer has important prognostic implications. Currently, resection is based on manual palpation and gross visualization followed by intraoperative specimen or tumor bed-based margin analysis using frozen sections. While generally effective, this protocol has several limitations including margin sampling and close and positive margin re-localization. There is a lack of evidence on the association of use of frozen section analysis with improved survival in head and neck cancer. This article reviews novel technologies in head and neck margin analysis such as 3-dimensional scanning, augmented reality, molecular margins, optical imaging, spectroscopy, and artificial intelligence.

Transoral non-robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

This retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the clinical, oncological, and functional outcomes of transoral non-robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 131 patients with surgically treated OPSCC (2010-2022) were analyzed. Patients who underwent exclusively transoral surgery were included in the study. The surgeries were performed under microscopic or endoscopic guidance and either a CO2 laser or an ultrasound/radiofrequency scalpel was used as a cutting instrument, depending on the characteristics and location of the tumor. Functional outcomes were assessed in terms of length of hospital stay, tracheostomy rate, duration of feeding tube dependency and complications. Survival outcomes were assessed in terms of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS).

RESULTS

Of 74 included patients, transoral surgery demonstrated safety with no major complications. Tracheotomy was performed in 51.4 % of cases, and was maintained for a median of 10 days. Complete swallowing recovery was restored in 97.3 % of cases, after a median of 5 days. The median length of hospital stay was 12 days. At 5 years, OS was 68.2 %, PFS was 58.2 % and DSS was 83.6 %.

CONCLUSION

The study confirms the safety and efficacy of a transoral approach for OPSCC. Having the capability to utilize and access a variety of tools provides the opportunity to tailor the technique to the individual patient and specific circumstances.

MRI and frozen section evaluation of mylohyoid muscle in determining surgical approach for T2-T3 floor of the mouth cancer

PURPOSE

The choice of surgical approach for floor of the mouth (FOM) cancer, particularly for intermediate-stage tumors (cT2-cT3), remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate a method considering mylohyoid muscle (MM) invasion as a determinant for surgical approach selection, utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) preoperatively and frozen section (FS) analysis intraoperatively.

METHODS

This observational retrospective cohort study analyzed patients undergoing surgical resection of cT2 and cT3 FOM squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) between January 2013 and June 2023. MM infiltration assessed by preoperative MRI determined the surgical approach: clear infiltration led to compartmental surgery (CS), while doubtful or absent infiltration led to transoral surgery (TOS). Conversion from TOS to CS occurred intraoperatively based on macroscopic evidence or positive FS. Data collected included demographic, clinical, surgical, and pathological variables. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Among 44 patients included, majority had cT2 tumors (59.1%). MM resection was necessary in 22.7% of cases. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) did not significantly differ between TOS and CS groups. Radiological depth of invasion (rDOI) < 10 mm is correlated with MM preservation in 89% of cases, while rDOI > 10 mm is correlated with MM resection only in 23.8% of cases. Pathological depth of invasion (pDOI) discrepancies were observed in the two groups: in CS group is shown a higher pDOI (> 10 mm) confirmation (90%). Surgical complications and functional outcomes differed between TOS and CS groups.

CONCLUSION

Considering MM invasion for surgical approach selection in cT2-cT3 FOM tumors appears oncologically safe, with better functional outcomes in muscle preservation. Preoperative MRI for MM assessment combined with intraoperative FS analysis provides reliable guidance for surgical decision-making.

[Surgical Treatment of Oropharyngeal Cancer - Recommendations of the Current German S3 Guideline, Part I]

In general, a trend towards transoral resection (as opposed to classic open approaches) + neck dissection + adjuvant radio- (chemo-) therapy has been observed for oropharyngeal carcinoma over the last 20 years. Techniques of transoral surgery (TOS), including transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) have been propagated in retrospective comparisons with conventional surgery or primary radiochemotherapy as gentle, minimally invasive procedures with good late functional results. Meta-analyses of mostly uncontrolled retrospective analyses suggest that TORS may have better disease-free survival (DFS) and a reduced risk of free flap reconstruction compared with open surgery. TORS (TOS) was associated with fewer tumor-positive resection margins (R1), a lower number of recurrences, fewer intraoperative tracheostomies, a shorter inpatient stay and a shorter duration of postoperative nasal tube feeding compared to open surgery. In principle, based on the best evidence currently available from registry studies, stage I-II oropharyngeal carcinomas can be treated either with primary surgery or radiochemotherapy with a comparable chance of survival. With comparable evidence for stage III and IVa, p16neg. oropharyngeal carcinomas, the majority of authors advocate primary surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy as the treatment of first choice. For p16pos. patients the results of registry studies are inconsistent, although the largest registry study on 450 HPV-positive stage III patients shows a significant superiority of primary surgery + adjuvant radiochemotherapy. Since all registry studies did not adjust for smoking status, among other factors, the current data situation should be evaluated with the necessary caution.

Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review on the role of margin status

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays, robotic surgery finds application in the field of head and neck in the treatment of oropharyngeal tumors. The aim of this work is to examine the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in performing safe oncological resections of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), with particular attention to the status of margins.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Literature search of English-language studies focused on TORS through PubMed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases. A total of 431 papers returned to search, but only 24 met the inclusion criteria. The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Guidelines.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Within the selected studies, the overall rate of OPSCC positive margins following TORS is minimal, especially when patient selection is adequate and when TORS is used by high volume centers.

CONCLUSIONS

TORS is a very precise and viable therapeutic tool that provides good results in terms of surgical radicality with low positive margin rates and good results in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival; however, there is still a great heterogeneity in margins definition within the available literature. Consequently, even if this surgical approach is very promising, it is still challenging to draw firm conclusions nowadays.

Surgical margins in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A narrative review

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a prevalent and frequently recurring malignancy, often necessitates surgical intervention. The surgical margin (SM) plays a pivotal role in determining the postoperative treatment strategy and prognostic evaluation of HNSCC. Nonetheless, the process of clinical appraisal and assessment of the SMs remains a complex and indeterminate endeavor, thereby leading to potential difficulties for surgeons in defining the extent of resection. In this regard, we undertake a comprehensive review of the suggested surgical distance in varying circumstances, diverse methods of margin evaluation, and the delicate balance that must be maintained between tissue resection and preservation in head and neck surgical procedures. This review is intended to provide surgeons with pragmatic guidance in selecting the most suitable resection techniques, and in improving patients' quality of life by achieving optimal functional and aesthetic restoration.

A New Proposal for Adequate Resection Margins in Larynx and Hypopharynx Tumor Surgery-Are the RCP Guidelines Feasible?

BACKGROUND

Resection margins are an important prognostic factor for patients with head and neck cancer. In general, for head and neck surgery, a margin >5 mm is advised by the Royal College of Pathologists. However, this cannot always be achieved during laryngeal and hypopharyngeal surgery. The aim of this study is to identify the resection surfaces and measure the maximum feasible margins per subsite. The clinical relevance of these maximum feasible resection margins were analyzed in this descriptive anatomical study.

METHODS

head and neck surgeons and a pathologist from the Erasmus MC performed a total laryngectomy and laryngopharyngectomy on a head and neck specimen specifically available for research.

RESULTS

For a total laryngectomy, resection margins >5 mm were not feasible for the ventral and dorsal resection surface. For a total laryngopharyngectomy, resection margins >5 mm were not feasible for the ventral, dorsal and lateral resection surface.

CONCLUSION

Clear resection margins, defined as a margin >5 mm, are not always feasible in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal surgery, due to the anatomy of the larynx and tumor location. However, striving for a maximum feasible margin is still the main goal. We propose a new guideline for maximum feasible but adequate resection margins in larynx and hypopharynx tumor surgery.

Essential data variables for a minimum dataset for head and neck cancer trials and clinical research: HNCIG consensus recommendations and database

The Head and Neck Cancer International Group (HNCIG) has undertaken an international modified Delphi process to reach consensus on the essential data variables to be included in a minimum database for HNC research. Endorsed by 19 research organisations representing 34 countries, these recommendations provide the framework to facilitate and harmonise data collection and sharing for HNC research. These variables have also been incorporated into a ready to use downloadable HNCIG minimum database, available from the HNCIG website.

Effect of palatine tonsil tumor resection on postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency in transoral surgery

BACKGROUND

Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) is a known complication of transoral surgery (TOS) for oropharyngeal HPV-mediated squamous cell carcinoma. Controversy exists regarding adequate resection margins for balancing functional and oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study was exempted by the IRB. Patients who underwent TOS from January 2017 to October 2022 were included. Patient characteristics, treatment details, and oncologic and functional outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were included. Mean and median follow-up was 34 months. 98% of patients were AJCC stage I/II. Recurrence-free survival was 96% with no local recurrences. Univariate analysis demonstrated an association between VPI and pT stage (p = 0.035), medial pterygoid resection (p = 0.049), and palatal attachment sacrifice (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed sacrifice of the palatal attachments remained a significant risk for VPI (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Loss of soft palate pharyngeal attachments is an independent risk factor for VPI. When oncologically appropriate, the palatal attachments to the pharynx may be preserved.

Oncological and functional outcomes for transoral robotic surgery following previous radiation treatment for upper aerodigestive tract head and neck cancers. A French multicenter GETTEC group study

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) opens new perspectives. We evaluated the outcomes for patients having undergone TORS after previous radiotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter study (n = 138) in a previously irradiated area between 2009 and 2020. Survival was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated using a chi-squared test, Fisher's test, or Wilcoxon's test.

RESULTS

The median length of hospital stay was 12.5 days. Bleeding was the most frequent postoperative complication (15.2%, n = 22). Prophylactic vessel ligation did not significantly decrease bleeding. Complications were significantly lower for Tis, T1, and N0 tumors. 91.6% (n = 120) of the patients with a perioperative tracheotomy could be decannulated. Larynx was functional for 65.94% of the patients. The median length of follow-up was 26 months. The 5-year overall and relapse-free survival rates were respectively 59.9% and 43.4%.

CONCLUSION

Oncological and functional results confirmed the value of TORS as a treatment in previously irradiated area.

Modified blade: an interventional option in rigid bronchoscopy for non-resectable benign tracheal stenosis

INTRODUCTION

Benign tracheobronchial stenosis is a abnormal tracheal lumen narrowing that may incur progressive dyspnea and life-threatening hypoxemia. There is no consensus on which patients should be treated with endoscopic or surgical method. This study investigates the outcomes of bronchoscopic dilatation in the treatment of benign tracheal stenosis using a device equipped with a blade to cut the stenotic lesions with dense fibrosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The procedure was carried out in an operating room under general anesthesia. All patients were intubated with a Rigid Bronchoscope (RB) placed just above the stenosis. Through Rigid Bronchoscopy combined modalities were used as needed: radial incisions of the mucosal stenosis with blade at the levels of 4, 8 and 12 o'clock, with back and forth movements, then the stenotic area was dilated more easily with a rigid bronchoscope. Dilatation was performed by passing the RB of increasing diameter through stenotic areas and then Balloon dilatation of increasing diameter. There were no complications during the procedure.

RESULT

We conducted an observational, retrospective, single-centre study in the Thoracic Surgery Unit of the University of 'Luigi Vanvitelli' of Naples from November 2011 to September 2021. We included all consecutive patients with benign tracheal stenosis inoperable. During the study period, 113 patients were referred to our department with benign tracheal stenosis inoperable. 61 patients were treated with the blade. During the follow-up, a recurrence of the stenosis was observed in 8 patients in the first month and in 4 patients in the third month. Instead in the patients treated with the use of laser (52 patients), during the follow-up a recurrence was observed in 16 patients in the first month and in 6 patients in the third month; no patient relapsed after 6 months and after 1 year. Long term successful bronchoscopic management with blade was attained by 99% in simple and 93% in mixed stenosis and in complex type stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Our study underlines the importance of the use of the blade in bronchoscopic treatment as a valid conservative approach in the management of patients with inoperable benign tracheal stenosis as an alternative to the use of the laser, reducing the abnormal inflammatory reaction in order to limit recurrences.

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field.

METHODS

In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication.

RESULTS

The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention.

CONCLUSION

As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.

Value and role of surgical margins in transoral laser microsurgery of the larynx, literature review and clinical considerations

PURPOSE

There is no agreement on the most appropriate post-operative pathway for the management of positive margins after laser cordectomy for early stage glottic tumours (T1-2N0M0). This literature review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the post-operative treatment with the best oncological results among follow-up, radiotherapy (RT) and surgical second look. The parameters utilized were incidence of recurrence, overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS) and disease-free (DFS) survival and larynx preservation (LP).

METHODS

The articles were found through a string typed into PubMed from 2007 to 2022. The studies with detailed oncological results were selected according to inclusion criteria, and then the meta-analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria for 2808 patients. The positive margin was found in 748 patients (26.6%), of which 416 were referred to follow-up, 89 to RT and 242 to a surgical second look. A false positive margin was found in 58/104 patients (56%). The recurrence rate in patients with positive margins was significantly higher (p = 0.003). In OS, DSS, DFS and LP, the odds ratio (OR) value was always greater than 1, assessing the role of the positive margin as a risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective studies will be necessary to establish the role of positive margin as a prognostic factor. A surgical second look in case of positive margin seems to be the best option for the patient in terms of lower risk of recurrence and better oncological results. Better collaboration between surgeon and pathologist would be desirable to limit the real and false positive margins.

Clarification of the margin status by the multidisciplinary tumor board following transoral robotic surgery for p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Objectives

Margin status interpretation following transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is challenging. This study aims to assess the discrepancy between status of margins as reported by the pathologist versus as determined by multi-disciplinary team review (MDTB).

Methods

A retrospective study of 57 patients with OPSCC who underwent TORS from January 2010 to December 2016 was conducted. Our primary outcome measure was the discrepancy between the surgical specimen margins as described in the pathology report versus final margin status that was determined after the multi-disciplinary team discussion. Fisher's exact test was used.

Results

Based on the pathologist-report, 29 subjects (51%) had positive margins, compared to 2 (4%) after multi-disciplinary team discussion. Receipt of chemotherapy correlated with final margin status as determined by MDTB, not with initial main specimen margins (p = .02 and p = .08, respectively). With a median follow up of 28.4 months, two subjects (4%) had loco-regional recurrence.

Conclusion

Following TORS, there was a significant discrepancy between status of margins as reported by the pathologist versus as determined by MDTB review. Chemotherapy was avoided in 93.1% of cases that were originally reported as positive margins by the pathologist with an acceptably low recurrence rate.

Level of evidence

4.

[Radiation or Surgery for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer? The ORATOR2 Trial - Comparing apples and oranges]

ORATOR2 was a randomized phase II trial aiming to assess an optimal approach for therapy de-escalation in early (T1-T2, N0-N2) human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC). Radiotherapy (RT) (consisting of a reduced dose of 60 Gy with concurrent weekly cisplatin in N+ patients) was compared to trans-oral surgery (TOS) and neck dissection (ND) (with adjuvant reduced-dose RT depending on pathologic findings) in 61 patients. The primary endpoint, overall survival, favored the radiotherapy approach. This was mainly due to 3 mortality events in the surgery arm (2 surgery-related) which resulted in an early trial termination. The authors, who speak on behalf of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery (working group for oncology) warn to draw conclusions for clinical practice pointing out the main shortages/weaknesses of this trial especially in the surgery arm (at least 1 cm margins, recommending re-operation if not achieved, prohibition of regional or free flaps, high rates of tracheotomy, low rate of TLM). Small patient numbers, a highly selected patient cohort and a short follow-up time further limit this study's relevance. Therefore, patients with HPV-related OPSCC should not receive de-escalating (radiation) therapy outside of clinical trials. When deciding between a surgical or a radio-therapeutical approach, patients should be informed about the pros and cons of both modalities after interdisciplinary consent in a tumor board, as long as clinical trial results` (e. g. EORTC 1420) are pending.

Intraoperative Imaging Techniques to Improve Surgical Resection Margins of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Current Literature

Inadequate resection margins in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma surgery necessitate adjuvant therapies such as re-resection and radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and imply increasing morbidity and worse prognosis. On the other hand, taking larger margins by extending the resection also leads to avoidable increased morbidity. Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) are often difficult to access; resections are limited by anatomy and functionality and thus carry an increased risk for close or positive margins. Therefore, there is a need to improve intraoperative assessment of resection margins. Several intraoperative techniques are available, but these often lead to prolonged operative time and are only suitable for a subgroup of patients. In recent years, new diagnostic tools have been the subject of investigation. This study reviews the available literature on intraoperative techniques to improve resection margins for OPSCCs. A literature search was performed in Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane. Narrow band imaging (NBI), high-resolution microendoscopic imaging, confocal laser endomicroscopy, frozen section analysis (FSA), ultrasound (US), computed tomography scan (CT), (auto) fluorescence imaging (FI), and augmented reality (AR) have all been used for OPSCC. NBI, FSA, and US are most commonly used and increase the rate of negative margins. Other techniques will become available in the future, of which fluorescence imaging has high potential for use with OPSCC.

A Prospective Study of Mucosal Sparing Radiation Therapy in Resected Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients

PURPOSE

Our objective was to report the prospective results of mucosal sparing radiation therapy in human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From March 2016 through May 2019, patients were enrolled in this institutional review board-approved prospective cohort study at a multisite institution. Inclusion criteria included p16+ American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh edition pathologic T1 or T2, N1 to N3, and M0 oropharyngeal cancers. Proton therapy (PT) was delivered to at-risk nodal regions, excluding the primary mucosal site. Secondary to insurance denial for PT, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was allowed. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Head and Neck Module and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System surveys (quality of life [QOL]) and modified barium swallowing impairment profiles (MBSImP) were obtained at baseline before radiation therapy, then 3 and 12 months after radiation therapy. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for time-to-event clinical outcomes, and repeated measures mixed models were used to explore changes in QOL over time. A comparison of QOL and swallowing outcomes with standard-of-care treatment was analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 61 evaluable patients with a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 10-64); 44 (72%) were treated with PT and 17 (28%) were treated with IMRT. The 2-year local control, locoregional control, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were 98%, 97%, 98%, and 100%, respectively. There were 6 grade ≥3 events related to treatment. Two IMRT patients required percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement during treatment secondary to significant nausea due to dysgeusia. Patients noted significant QOL improvement over time in the pain, swallowing, speech, social eating, social contact, mouth opening, and use of pain medication domains (all P < .02). The MBSImP overall severity score as well as oral and pharyngeal impairment scores showed stability with no significant change over time. For the 44 patients treated with PT, the mean D95 to the primary target was 10.7 Gy (standard deviation = 12.5 Gy).

CONCLUSIONS

Mucosal sparing radiation is well tolerated in select resected human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with a low risk of recurrence at the mucosal primary site, a low rate of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement, and few radiation-related grade ≥3 adverse events.

Analysis of Outcomes following TORS in a Mixed Cohort of Recurrent and New T1-T2 Oropharyngeal Cancer- A Single Institution Study

Purpose

. The transoral robotic surgery is a newer modality being used in surgical treatment of early oropharyngeal cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the outcome of these cases in terms of two year disease free survival and overall survival.

Methods

Between July 2016 and September 2018, 58 patients suffering from early oropharyngeal cancer underwent transoral robotic surgery with neck dissection at a tertiary referral centre. 43 of them have completed two years follow up and were analyzed for disease free survival and overall survival. 41 patients had HPV analysis done .

Results

The surgical margins were positive in 9/43 patients ( 6 in upfront surgery and 3 in the salvage cohort). Adjuvant therapy was administered to 16/34 patients on account of either positive margins or multiple nodal metastasis. 88% patients were found to be HPV negative. The two year disease free survival for the upfront cohort was 88.2% and salvage cohort was 55.5%. The overall survival was 86.05%.

Conclusions

The study highlights good locoregional control and two year disease free survival in HPV negative oropharyngeal cancer undergoing robotic surgery. Additionally, a positive surgical margin and recurrence were the statistically significant variables influencing 2 year disease free survival. Trans oral robotic surgery is an excellent tool for early tumors of the oropharynx. The presence of a positive surgical margin is a grim sign for survival and has a significant impact on positive outcome.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-022-03139-5.

Margin Sampling and Survival Outcomes in Oral Cavity and p16-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Objective

To compare the association of margin sampling technique on survival outcomes in surgically treated cT1-2 oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Study Design

A prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary care academic teaching hospital in Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Methods

All cases of surgically treated cT1-2 oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer undergoing specimen-oriented margin analysis between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018 were analyzed. The specimen-oriented cohort was compared with a cohort of patients from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2014, where a defect-oriented margin sampling protocol was used. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate 2-year overall survival, disease-specific survival, local control, and recurrence-free survival rates in oral cavity and p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the effect of margin sampling method on disease-specific survival and local control.

Results

There was no significant association between margin sampling technique and 2-year survival outcomes for surgically treated cT1-2 oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, the hazard ratio (HR) of specimen-oriented sampling was not significantly different for disease-specific survival (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.3032-5.727; P = .713) or local control (HR, 0.4087; 95% CI, 0.0795-2.099; P = .284).

Conclusion

Intraoperative margin sampling method was not associated with a significant change in 2-year survival outcomes. Despite no effect on survival outcomes, implementation of a specimen-oriented sampling method has potential for cost avoidance by decreasing the number of re-resections for positive or close margins.

Transoral robotic surgery and neck dissection alone for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Influence of resection margins on oncological outcomes

OBJECTIVES

This study reports oncological outcomes of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and neck dissection (ND) alone for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and aims to analyse the influence of resection margins on local recurrence rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients treated with curative intent for HNSCC, with TORS and ND alone between 2013 and 2019 at two tertiary centres were included in this observational multi-centre prospective cohort study. Oncological outcomes are reported on 47 patients for whom the aim was to treat with TORS and ND alone; this excluded four patients who were recommended adjuvant radiotherapy based on resective pathology but did not receive treatment. Local control is the primary endpoint; disease specific, progression free and overall survival are secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

With a median follow up of 43 months, estimated outcomes at 3 years (n = 47) were as follows: local control 92%, progression free survival 80%, disease specific survival 94%, and overall survival 84%. Presence of a positive margin on the main specimen was the only statistically significant predictor of local recurrence on univariate Cox regression analysis. Time dependent receiver operating characteristic curve identified margins of 1.1 mm as a threshold for local control, with area under the curve 0.788 (95% CI 0.616-0.960), indicating a good classifier.

CONCLUSION

This is the first UK surgery alone series reporting mature oncological outcomes following TORS and ND. Positive margins on the resected specimen are the strongest predictor of local recurrence, with conventional definitions of "close margins" having no impact.

Close Surgical Margins in Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer: Do They Impact Prognosis?

Introduction. Mucosal margins exhibit a mean shrinkage of 30−40% after resection of oral and oropharyngeal cancers, and an adequate in situ surgical margin frequently results in a pathological close margin. However, the impact on prognosis remains unclear. We investigated the impact of a pathological close margin on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological data of 418 patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity or oropharynx who underwent initial surgery (with curative intent) at our institute between 2010 and 2016. Results. Of the total population, the pathological marginal status of 290 (69.4%) patients was reported as clear (>5 mm), 61 (14.6%) as close (>1 mm, ≤5 mm), and 67 (16.0%) as positive (≤1 mm). The 5-year DFSs were 79.3%, 65.1%, and 52% in patients in the negative margin (group 1), close margin (group 2), and positive margin (group 3) groups, respectively. The difference between groups 1 and 2 was not significant (p = 0.213) but the difference between groups 2 and 3 was (p = 0.034). The 5-year OSs were 79.4%, 84%, and 52.3% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The difference between groups 1 and 2 was not significant (p = 0.824) but the difference between groups 2 and 3 was (p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, older age, advanced T stage, and a positive margin were independently prognostic of the 5-year DFS and OS. Conclusion. In conclusion, the OS of patients with close margins was no different than that of others when appropriate postoperative adjuvant and/or salvage treatment were/was prescribed. However, we could not determine the impact of close margins on locoregional recurrence given various biases in our study setting. A future prospective study is needed.

Robotic vs. transoral laser surgery of malignant oropharyngeal tumors-what is best for the patient? : A contemporary review

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx is a malignancy of increasing prevalence. The oncologic community is currently evaluating the safety and efficacy of de-intensifying treatment without compromising oncologic outcomes. Paramount to these treatment algorithms is primary surgery through transoral approaches. This article reviews the literature and concepts pertaining to transoral surgery and describes the two most common techniques, transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2022

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses. Occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM) are also addressed. The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's most recent recommendations regarding management of HPV-positive oropharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.

Surgical Margin Determination in the Era of HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The goal of head and neck cancer surgery is the complete resection of tumor with a cuff of healthy tissue. A 5-mm margin is optimal but not always achievable in the oropharynx. We aimed to identify a consensus of definition and management of close margins for human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal cancer without other risk factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive survey.

METHODS

A survey of the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) was conducted to evaluate the abovementioned objectives by presenting hypothetical scenarios and asking questions regarding management.

RESULTS

One-hundred fifty-five AHNS members completed the survey (18% response rate). Close margins were defined as <5 mm, <3 mm, and <1 mm by 27.7%, 32.3%, and 32.3% of respondents. There was no significant difference in margin determination with experience level (P = .186). In an HPV-positive tumor with close margins, 51% chose postoperative observation. The remainder chose adjuvant radiation (22.6%), chemoradiation (1.9%), or re-excision of the wound bed (19.4%). There was no association between postoperative close margin management and experience level (P = .80).

CONCLUSION

Heterogeneity exists in the definition and management of close margins in HPV-mediated oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC). Establishing a standard regarding close margins in HPV-mediated OPSCC may allow for the optimization of outcomes and help define best practices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5 Laryngoscope, 131:E2650-E2654, 2021.

Deintensification Strategies Using Proton Beam Therapy for HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer

Oropharyngeal cancers related to the human papillomavirus are a growing segment of head and neck cancers throughout the world. These cancers are biologically and demographically unique with patients presenting at younger ages and with more curable disease. This combination of factors heightens the importance of normal tissue sparing because patients will live a long time with treatment sequelae. Proton therapy has demonstrated benefits in reducing normal tissue exposure, which may lead to less toxicity, a higher quality of life, less immunologic suppression, and lower cost. Research investigating deintensified radiation volumes and doses are also underway. These deintensification studies synergize well with the beam characteristics of proton beam therapy and can decrease that already reduced normal tissue exposure enabled by proton therapy. Future studies should refine patient selection to best allow for volume and dose reduction paired with proton therapy.

Impact of Close Margins in Head and Neck Mucosal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of the study is to investigate whether close surgical margins impact oncologic outcomes compared to clear or involved surgical margins. We hypothesize that close surgical margins portend worse outcomes compared with clear margins, but improved outcomes compared with involved margins.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement standards, a systematic search was conducted for studies that reported oncologic outcomes following excision of primary mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). A meta-analysis was then performed, comparing local recurrence (LR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), and overall survival (OS) in patients with clear, close, and involved margins.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, totaling 8,435 patients. About 96% of our included cases involved the oral cavity, 2% involved the oropharynx, and 2% other. Also, 68% of cases were T1/T2 and 32% were T3/T4. On meta-analysis, clear margins were associated with lower incidence of 5-year LR relative risk (RR) 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.65) and higher 5-year OS (RR 1.22, 1.11-1.35), when compared with close margins. Involved margins had higher incidence of 5-year LR (RR 1.75, 1.16-2.64), higher incidence of LRR at last follow-up (RR 1.66, 1.37-2.00), and no difference in 5-year OS (RR 0.82, 0.60-1.11), when compared with close margins.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a stepwise improvement in oncologic outcomes as surgical margin categorically improves from involved to close to clear. Patients with close margins therefore may benefit from adjuvant therapy. Further research is required to investigate whether these findings are seen in non-oral cavity cases because they were underrepresented in this analysis. Laryngoscope, 2021.

Oncologic outcomes of transoral robotic surgery for HPV-negative oropharyngeal carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) continue to experience disappointing outcomes following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and appreciable morbidity following historical surgical approaches. We aimed to investigate the oncologic outcomes and perioperative morbidity of a transoral robotic surgery (TORS) approach to surgically resectable HPV-negative OPSCC.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis HPV-negative OPSCC patients who underwent TORS, neck dissection and pathology-guided adjuvant therapy (2005-2017).

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients (91.1% stage III/IV) were included. Three-year overall survival, locoregional control, and disease-free survival were 85.5%, 84.4%, and 73.6%, respectively (median follow-up 30.6 months, interquartile range 18.4-66.6). Eighteen (32.1%) patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy and 20 (39.3%) underwent adjuvant CRT. Perioperative mortality occurred in one (1.8%) patient and hemorrhage occurred in two (3.6%) patients. Long-term gastrostomy and tracheostomy rates were 5.4% and 0.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The TORS approach for resectable HPV-negative OPSCC can achieve encouraging oncologic outcomes with infrequent morbidity.

Oropharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with Surgery Alone: Outcomes and Predictors of Failure

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the oncologic outcomes and risk factors for recurrence in patients who underwent surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), and in whom adjuvant therapy was not recommended or was declined.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients with OPSCC who were treated with transoral surgery only at a tertiary care academic medical center from April 2010 to March 2019.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients met inclusion criteria. In 16, adjuvant therapy was recommended but declined. There were 8 recurrences, of which 6 had been given recommendations for adjuvant therapy. Of the 8 recurrences, 2 died, 2 are alive with disease, and 4 were successfully salvaged. Five patients died of unrelated causes. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI, P = .016) had a significant impact on recurrence, while other pathologic features of the primary tumor such as size, location, human papillomavirus (HPV) status, and margin status did not. Margins were classified as "positive" in 4 patients, "close" in 54, and "negative" in 16. There were 3 local recurrences (4.1%), each of whom had declined adjuvant therapy. Lymph node features such as N-stage (P = .0004), number of positive nodes (P = .0005), and presence of extra-nodal extension (ENE, P = .0042) had a statistically significant impact on relapse. Smoking history and surgical approach showed no significant impact on recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Patients who undergo surgery for HPV-positive OPSCC with negative margins, no PNI, no LVI, and ≤1 positive lymph node without ENE have low risk for recurrence. These patients can likely be safely treated with surgery alone. Patients with these risk factors who decline adjuvant therapy are at risk for recurrence, and should be monitored.

Impact of surgical margins on local control in patients undergoing single-modality transoral robotic surgery for HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The impact of close surgical margins on oncologic outcomes in HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV + OPSCC) is unclear.

METHODS

Retrospective case series including patients undergoing single modality transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for HPV + OPSCC at three academic medical centers from 2010 to 2019. Outcomes were compared between patients with close surgical margins (<1 mm or requiring re-resection) and clear margins using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients were included (median follow-up 21 months, range 6-121). Final margins were close in 22 (22.2%) patients, clear in 75 (75.8%), and positive in two (2.0%). Eight patients (8.1%) recurred, including two local recurrences (2.0%). Four patients died during the study period (4.0%). Local control (p = 0.470), disease-free survival (p = 0.513), and overall survival (p = 0.064) did not differ between patients with close and clear margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with close surgical margins after TORS for HPV + OPSCC without concurrent indications for adjuvant therapy may be considered for observation alone.

Post-operative outcomes of different surgical approaches to oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer: a case-matched study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the post-operative outcomes of transoral laser microsurgery, lateral pharyngotomy and transmandibular surgery in oropharyngeal cancer management.

METHODS

Records of 162 patients treated with transmandibular surgery, transoral laser microsurgery or lateral pharyngotomy were reviewed. The transoral laser microsurgery cohort was matched with the lateral pharyngotomy and transmandibular surgery cohorts for tumour stage, tumour subsite and human papilloma virus status, and the intra- and post-operative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Duration of surgery and hospital stay were significantly longer for transmandibular surgery. Tracheostomy and nasogastric feeding tube rates were similar, but time to decannulation and to oral feeding were longer in the transmandibular surgery group. Transmandibular surgery more frequently required flap reconstruction and had a greater complication rate. Negative margins were fewer in the lateral pharyngotomy group than in the transoral laser microsurgery and transmandibular surgery groups.

CONCLUSION

In comparison with transmandibular surgery, transoral laser microsurgery and lateral pharyngotomy were associated with fewer complications and faster functional recovery. Lateral pharyngotomy had a higher rate of positive margins than transoral laser microsurgery, with a consequently greater need for adjuvant therapy. Many patients are nonetheless unsuitable for transoral surgery. All these factors should be considered when deciding on oropharyngeal cancer surgical treatment.

Precision head and neck surgery: robotics and surgical vision technology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the molecular basis of head and neck cancer becomes more clearly defined, precision medicine has gradually refined the multidisciplinary treatment paradigm for patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Although precision medicine is often thought to refer to new molecular diagnostics or unique medical therapy, the recent adoption of robotic surgery has ushered in the era of 'precision' head and neck surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgeons now routinely utilize a virtual reality environment to reduce the morbidity of head and neck surgical care and improve oncologic and functional outcomes. The development and subsequent FDA approval of the da Vinci SP system, a single-arm system with a flexible camera, has allowed for improved visualization and access to the deep oropharynx and larynx. Groups investigating anti-EGFR antibodies tagged with fluorescent dye as well as inherent autofluorescence differences between normal and cancerous mucosal tissues show promise for improving positive surgical margin rates.

SUMMARY

The evolution of robotics and visualization for oropharyngeal cancer represents a novel and innovative utilization of new technology to improve care. Further advancements in techniques, from refinement of the robotic platform itself, to novel real-time tumour imaging options will be critical to further advance precision care for these patients.

Determination of posterolateral oropharyngeal wall thickness and the potential implications for transoral surgical margins in tonsil cancer

BACKGROUND

Margins in transoral surgery for tonsil cancer can be limited by oropharyngeal wall thickness (OWT), but the normal range is not well established.

METHODS

In 240 noncancer subjects, OWT was measured bilaterally in the vicinity of the tonsils with MRI. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for interaction of age, sex, location, and obesity.

RESULTS

Mean(SD) OWT measured 3.4(0.6) mm posteriorly, 3.7(2.0) mm between the styloglossus and stylopharyngeus, and 5.3(0.8) mm laterally. OWT was greater in men, correlated with obesity, decreased posteriorly and laterally in the 60-80 versus 40-59 year age groups, and increased when styloglossus/stylopharyngeus were closer. OWT was <5 mm in 36.7%-97.9% of locations, with the largest percentage below this threshold located posteriorly.

CONCLUSIONS

OWT is frequently <5 mm, particularly in the posterior and intermuscular areas, suggesting that a smaller surgical margin may need to be accepted in transoral tonsil cancer surgery for anatomic reasons.

Endoscopic video-assisted transoral (EVAT) surgery of the oropharynx: clinical, oncological and functional outcomes

PURPOSE

Transoral surgery for suspected or proven oropharyngeal malignancies has increased significantly with the practice of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS). An accepted alternative technique is endoscopic video-assisted transoral (EVAT) surgery. Our aim is to review the clinical, oncological and functional outcomes of this technique at our institution.

METHODS

56 consecutive patients undergoing EVAT surgery as part of their cancer work up or treatment were reviewed, focusing on clinical, oncological, and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients had primary oropharyngeal cancer or carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) staged between T0-T3 and N0-N3. EVAT surgery identified a primary in 47.1% of CUP with p16 positive disease. Major haemorrhage occurred in 1.8%, with eight post-operative complications. 8.9% of patients developed locoregional recurrence. Mean MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory score was 76.4 following EVAT surgery, 68.8 after EVAT surgery + radiotherapy and 67.1 after EVAT surgery + chemoradiotherapy CONCLUSION: Early clinical, oncological and functional outcomes following EVAT surgery are comparable to TLM and TORS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 (case series).

The Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transcription Factor Slug Predicts Survival Benefit of Up-Front Surgery in Head and Neck Cancer

Simple Summary

In preclinical studies, the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related transcription factor Slug indicated radio- and chemoresistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Here we show that Slug is a biomarker associated with treatment failure in HNSCC patients treated with primary radio- or radiochemotherapy, but not in patients undergoing upfront surgery and postoperative radio- or chemoradiotherapy. Slug may thus serve as a predictive biomarker to identify HNSCC patients who will benefit from upfront surgery. Slug status is an immunohistochemical (IHC) parameter that is easy to determine. If the predictive value observed here can be confirmed in validation studies with independent data, Slug immunohistochemistry may have significant clinical relevance in treatment planning for HNSCC patients.

Abstract

EMT promotes radio- and chemotherapy resistance in HNSCC in vitro. As EMT has been correlated to the transcription factor Slug in tumor specimens from HNSCC patients, we assessed whether Slug overexpression predicts radio- and chemotherapy resistance and favors upfront surgery in HNSCC patients. Slug expression was determined by IHC scoring in tumor specimens from patients with incident HNSCC. Patients were treated with either definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (primary RT/CRT) or upfront surgery with or without postoperative RT or CRT (upfront surgery/PORT). Treatment failure rates and overall survival (OS) were compared between RT/CRT and upfront surgery/PORT in Slug-positive and Slug-negative patients. Slug IHC was positive in 91/354 HNSCC patients. Primary RT/CRT showed inferior response rates (univariate odds ratio (OR) for treatment failure, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.7 to 7.9; p = 0.001) and inferior 5-year OS (univariate, p < 0.001) in Slug-positive patients. The independent predictive value of Slug expression status was confirmed in a multivariable Cox model (p = 0.017). Slug-positive patients had a 3.3 times better chance of survival when treated with upfront surgery/PORT versus primary RT/CRT. For HNSCC patients, Slug IHC represents a novel and feasible predictive biomarker to support upfront surgery.

Head and Neck Cancer Treatments from Chemotherapy to Magnetic Systems: Perspectives and Challenges

BACKGROUND

Cancer is one of the diseases causing society's fears as a stigma of death and pain. Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) is a group of malignant neoplasms of different locations in this region of the human body. It is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in Brazil, because these malignant neoplasias, in most cases, are diagnosed in late phases. Surgical excision, chemotherapy and radiotherapy encompass the forefront of antineoplastic therapy; however, the numerous side effects associated with these therapeutic modalities are well known. Some treatments present enough potential to help or replace conventional treatments, such as Magnetic Hyperthermia and Photodynamic Therapy. Such approaches require the development of new materials at the nanoscale, able to carry out the loading of their active components while presenting characteristics of biocompatibility mandatory for biomedical applications.

OBJECTIVE

This work aims to make a bibliographical review of HNSCC treatments. Recent techniques proven effective in other types of cancer were highlighted and raised discussion and reflections on current methods and possibilities of enhancing the treatment of HNSCC.

METHOD

The study was based on a bibliometric research between the years 2008 and 2019 using the following keywords: Cancer, Head and Neck Cancer, Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, Photodynamic Therapy, and Hyperthermia.

RESULTS

A total of 5.151.725 articles were found, 3.712.670 about cancer, 175.470 on Head and Neck Cancer, 398.736 on Radiotherapy, 760.497 on Chemotherapy, 53.830 on Hyperthermia, and 50.522 on Photodynamic Therapy.

CONCLUSION

The analysis shows that there is still much room for expanding research, especially for alternative therapies since most of the studies still focus on conventional treatments and on the quest to overcome their side effects. The scientific community needs to keep looking for more effective therapies generating fewer side effects for the patient. Currently, the so-called alternative therapies are being used in combination with the conventional ones, but the association of these new therapies shows great potential, in other types of cancer, to improve the treatment efficacy.

Specimen-driven intraoperative assessment of resection margins should be standard of care for oral cancer patients

With an incidence of 350.000 new cases per year, cancer of the oral cavity ranks among the 10 most common solid organ cancers. Most of these cancers are squamous cell carcinomas. Five-year survival is about 50%. It has been shown that clear resection margins (>5 mm healthy tissue surrounding the resected tumor) have a significant positive effect on locoregional control and survival. It is not uncommon that the resection margins of oral tumors are inadequate. However, when providing the surgeon with intraoperative feedback on the resection margin status, it is expected that obtaining adequate resection margins is improved. In this respect, it has been shown that specimen-driven intraoperative assessment of resection margins is superior to defect-driven intraoperative assessment of resection margins. In this concise report, it is described how a specimen-driven approach can increase the rate of adequate resections of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma as well as that it is discussed how intraoperative assessment can be further improved with regard to the surgical treatment of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

HPV/p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer treated with transoral robotic surgery: The roles of margins, extra-nodal extension and adjuvant treatment

PURPOSE

Human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) treatment outcomes are re-defining management. Traditional margins, the role of extranodal extension (ENE) and adjuvant treatment intensity continue to be debated. This study aimed to determine the impact of margins, ENE and adjuvant therapy on survival following transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

METHODS

Patients treated with TORS at an academic center were retrospectively identified (2013-2019). Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

48 patients were included. 40 (83%) were male. Mean age was 61.2 years. 43 (90%) were stage I. 22 (45.8%) had ENE. 31 (65%) had margins >1 mm. 38 (79%) had indications for radiation therapy; 9 (24%) refused. Chemotherapy was recommended in 36 (75%) patients; 24 (67%) refused. Locoregional control was 98%, metastasis-free survival was 96%, and disease-specific survival was 100% at 5-years. Overall survival was 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the high survival rate seen after TORS, it is likely that margins, ENE and adjuvant treatment may not significantly contribute to outcomes.

Muscle invasion in oropharyngeal carcinoma undergoing transoral robotic surgery

BACKGROUNDS

Pathologic features of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) treated with trans-oral robotic surgery predict prognosis and adjuvant therapy. We hypothesized that pathologic muscle invasion (pMI) is associated with poor pathological markers.

METHODS

Retrospective review of surgically treated OPSCC to identify pMI and its association with poor pathologic markers.

RESULTS

pMI was present in 12/37 patients, and compared to non-pMI, was associated with higher rates of lymphovascular invasion (75% vs. 36%, p = 0.03), perineural invasion (16.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.04), extranodal extension (66.7% vs. 20%, p < 0.01), and tumor stage (8.3% vs. 48% pT1, 75% vs. 52% pT2 and 16.7% vs. 0% pT3). pMI was associated with having a positive margin on main specimen (41.7% vs. 12%, p = 0.04) but not after considering additional margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Muscle invasion was associated with higher pathologic tumor staging, poor pathologic factors, and higher rates of positive margin on main specimen.

Early T1-T2 stage p16+ oropharyngeal tumours. Role of upfront transoral robotic surgery in de-escalation treatment strategies. A review of the current literature

Human papillomavirus is responsible of approximately 70% oropharyngeal tumours and is related with more favourable outcomes. It has led to an increasing interest for de-escalation treatment strategies such as Trans Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS). A literature review was performed searching for the role of TORS as de-escalation modality of treatment in patients with p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Special attention was paid to the potential advantage offered by TORS in reducing adjuvant radiation therapy. Six questions were formulated. 67 studies were selected. Several trials analysing the role of upfront TORS to treat early stage p16+ OPSCC and the possibility of reducing the adjuvant radiotherapy were founded. A lot of studies based on the experience of single centres show promising results. Nevertheless to date no definitive data can be extrapolated. The continued investigation of this line of de-escalation therapy with randomized prospective clinical trials is needed.

Endonasal endoscopic surgery for sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma from an oncological perspective

Endonasal endoscopic surgery (EES) has been applied to the management of sinonasal (SN) tumors based on recent advances in endoscopic surgical techniques and technologies over the past three decades. EES has been mainly indicated for benign tumors and less aggressive malignant tumors. Notwithstanding this, EES has been gradually adopted for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), which is the most common histology among SN malignancies. However, an analysis of the outcomes of EES for patients with SCC is difficult because most articles included SCC a wide range of different tumor histologies. Therefore, we herein review and clarify the current status of EES focusing on SCC from an oncological perspective. The oncologic outcomes and the ability to achieve a histologically complete resection are similar between endoscopic and open approaches in highly selected patients with SN-SCC. Surgical complications associated with EES are likely similar for SN-SCC compared to other sinonasal malignancies. The indications for a minimally invasive approach such as EES in the management of patients with SN-SCC should be stricter than those for less aggressive malignant tumors because of the aggressive nature of SCC. Also, it is important to achieve negative surgical margins with EES in patients with SCC. We believe that the indications for EES for SN-SCC are widening due to advances in diagnostic imaging, and endoscopic surgical techniques and technologies. However, while expanding the indications for EES for SN-SCC we must carefully confirm that the outcomes support this strategy.

Radical Tonsillectomy and Superior Pharyngeal Constrictor Anatomy: A Cadaveric and Oncologic Specimen Assessment

INTRODUCTION

The rise in primary surgical management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma has led to varying interpretations of the histopathologic evaluation following a radical tonsillectomy. The oncologic margin may be significantly influenced by the morphologic relations and anatomic dimensions of the palatine tonsil and superior pharyngeal constrictor (SPC) muscle.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to characterize the gross and histologic anatomic features of the palatine tonsil and SPC muscle following an en bloc radical tonsillectomy.

METHODS

Radical tonsillectomy specimens were collected from cadaveric and oncologic subjects. Specimens were processed using standard histopathologic techniques and were analyzed by a board-certified head and neck pathologist. The thickness of the SPC muscle and relationship to the tonsillar carcinoma were assessed.

RESULTS

Six cadaveric and 10 oncologic specimens were analyzed. The mean minimum SPC width for all cadaveric specimens was 1.02 ± 0.50 mm. The mean minimum width for oncologic specimens was 0.76 ± 0.46 mm. The mean distance from tonsil carcinoma to the lateral specimen margin was 1.79 ± 1.39 mm.

CONCLUSION

Due to the limited width of the SPC muscle, a margin in excess of 2 mm may not be attainable in a transoral radical tonsillectomy. Margin status may be ideally determined by the integrity of the SPC muscle in future oncologic studies, rather than an adequate distance measurement.

An Update on Surgical Margins in the Head Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Assessment, Clinical Outcome, and Future Directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Failure to achieve tumor-free margins is the single largest cause of death for head neck cancer patients. At the same time, it is the only factor that is in complete control of the surgeon. This review summarizes evidence for the definition, clinical implications, and methods to achieve optimal margins.

RECENT FINDINGS

The previous universally followed definition of adequate margin (5 mm in final histopathology) has been disputed. Various biological, optical, and imaging adjuncts can aid in achieving optimal margins. Extent of resection and margins in human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancers and following induction chemotherapy remain controversial. Though practiced widely, frozen section-guided margin revision has not conclusively shown improved local control rates. The role of molecular assessment of margins is promising but not established. The definition of adequate margin differs according to the site in the head neck region. Currently, the 5-mm margin at final histopathology is the most commonly accepted definition of an "adequate" margin.

Surgical resection of oral cancer: en-bloc versus discontinuous approach

OBJECTIVES

In the past literature agreed on treating oral carcinomas, using an "en-bloc" resection (EBR) but recently minimally invasive transoral surgery has spread as the preferable treatment for selected cases. This latter technique, which is performed with a discontinuous resection (DR), allows for a satisfactory postoperative quality of life (QoL) maintaining good survival rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we analyzed data about 147 surgically treated patients with oral cancer involving tongue and floor of the mouth. The sample was divided according to the surgical approach: EBR and DR group which were compared in terms of recurrence, overall survival, disease-free survival, and QoL.

RESULTS

In the DR group, survival analysis showed better results in term of survival, locoregional control, and postoperative anxiety, while the other QoL scores were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The more invasive approach does not correlate to a better outcome. In selected cases, DR is an oncologically safe technique; EBR is still a valid option to treat advanced oral cancers.

Evaluation of robotic surgery for transoral resection of T1-2 squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa

GOAL

To evaluate transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for isolated previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the tonsillar fossa classified as T1-2.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis of two cohorts of isolated untreated T1-2 tonsillar fossa SCC consecutively operated on by a transoral approach, with (R=21) and without (NR=24) robotic assistance, in the period 2006-2014. Three main (survival, local control, and operative morbidity) and three secondary (pathologic data, incidence and duration of tracheotomy and nasogastric intubation, and hospital stay) endpoints were compared between groups. The significance threshold was set at P< .005.

RESULTS

Three- and five-year actuarial survival estimates were 80.2% and 74.5% respectively in group R, and 91.5% and 82.5% respectively in group NR (NS: P=.34). Three- and five-year actuarial local control estimates were 90% and 90% respectively in group R, and 95.8% and 91% respectively in group NR (NS: P=.81). There were no significant differences in morbidity, tracheotomy/nasogastric intubation time, or hospital stay. Positive resection margins (R1) were noted in 38.1% and 16.7% in groups R and NR, respectively (NS: P=.05) without significant impact on 5-year actuarial local control (P=0.78).

CONCLUSION

Robotic assistance in transoral lateral oropharyngectomy for T1-2 tonsillar fossa SCC did not significantly impact oncologic or functional outcome.