1
|
Kuan EC, Wang EW, Adappa ND, Beswick DM, London NR, Su SY, Wang MB, Abuzeid WM, Alexiev B, Alt JA, Antognoni P, Alonso-Basanta M, Batra PS, Bhayani M, Bell D, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Betz CS, Blay JY, Bleier BS, Bonilla-Velez J, Callejas C, Carrau RL, Casiano RR, Castelnuovo P, Chandra RK, Chatzinakis V, Chen SB, Chiu AG, Choby G, Chowdhury NI, Citardi MJ, Cohen MA, Dagan R, Dalfino G, Dallan I, Dassi CS, de Almeida J, Dei Tos AP, DelGaudio JM, Ebert CS, El-Sayed IH, Eloy JA, Evans JJ, Fang CH, Farrell NF, Ferrari M, Fischbein N, Folbe A, Fokkens WJ, Fox MG, Lund VJ, Gallia GL, Gardner PA, Geltzeiler M, Georgalas C, Getz AE, Govindaraj S, Gray ST, Grayson JW, Gross BA, Grube JG, Guo R, Ha PK, Halderman AA, Hanna EY, Harvey RJ, Hernandez SC, Holtzman AL, Hopkins C, Huang Z, Huang Z, Humphreys IM, Hwang PH, Iloreta AM, Ishii M, Ivan ME, Jafari A, Kennedy DW, Khan M, Kimple AJ, Kingdom TT, Knisely A, Kuo YJ, Lal D, Lamarre ED, Lan MY, Le H, Lechner M, Lee NY, Lee JK, Lee VH, Levine CG, Lin JC, Lin DT, Lobo BC, Locke T, Luong AU, Magliocca KR, Markovic SN, Matnjani G, McKean EL, Meço C, Mendenhall WM, Michel L, Na'ara S, Nicolai P, Nuss DW, Nyquist GG, Oakley GM, Omura K, Orlandi RR, Otori N, Papagiannopoulos P, Patel ZM, Pfister DG, Phan J, Psaltis AJ, Rabinowitz MR, Ramanathan M, Rimmer R, Rosen MR, Sanusi O, Sargi ZB, Schafhausen P, Schlosser RJ, Sedaghat AR, Senior BA, Shrivastava R, Sindwani R, Smith TL, Smith KA, Snyderman CH, Solares CA, Sreenath SB, Stamm A, Stölzel K, Sumer B, Surda P, Tajudeen BA, Thompson LDR, Thorp BD, Tong CCL, Tsang RK, Turner JH, Turri-Zanoni M, Udager AM, van Zele T, VanKoevering K, Welch KC, Wise SK, Witterick IJ, Won TB, Wong SN, Woodworth BA, Wormald PJ, Yao WC, Yeh CF, Zhou B, Palmer JN. International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:149-608. [PMID: 37658764 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field. METHODS In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication. RESULTS The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention. CONCLUSION As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Kuan
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel M Beswick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nyall R London
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumor Program, Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marilene B Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Waleed M Abuzeid
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Borislav Alexiev
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Paolo Antognoni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Michelle Alonso-Basanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pete S Batra
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mihir Bhayani
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Diana Bell
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christian S Betz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, UNICANCER, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Benjamin S Bleier
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Juliana Bonilla-Velez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Claudio Callejas
- Department of Otolaryngology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ricardo L Carrau
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Roy R Casiano
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Rakesh K Chandra
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Simon B Chen
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alexander G Chiu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Garret Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Naweed I Chowdhury
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Martin J Citardi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Gianluca Dalfino
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Iacopo Dallan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - John de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angelo P Dei Tos
- Section of Pathology, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - John M DelGaudio
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Charles S Ebert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ivan H El-Sayed
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jean Anderson Eloy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - James J Evans
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christina H Fang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, The University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Nyssa F Farrell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Marco Ferrari
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nancy Fischbein
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Adam Folbe
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Wytske J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meha G Fox
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Gary L Gallia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Christos Georgalas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Anne E Getz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Satish Govindaraj
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stacey T Gray
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica W Grayson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Bradley A Gross
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jordon G Grube
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Ruifeng Guo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Patrick K Ha
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ashleigh A Halderman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ehab Y Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard J Harvey
- Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, Applied Medical Research Centre, University of South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen C Hernandez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Claire Hopkins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Zhigang Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenxiao Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Ian M Humphreys
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Peter H Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alfred M Iloreta
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Masaru Ishii
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Aria Jafari
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David W Kennedy
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohemmed Khan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adam J Kimple
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd T Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Anna Knisely
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ying-Ju Kuo
- Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Devyani Lal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric D Lamarre
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ming-Ying Lan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matt Lechner
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jivianne K Lee
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Victor H Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Corinna G Levine
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jin-Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Derrick T Lin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian C Lobo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Tran Locke
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amber U Luong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly R Magliocca
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Svetomir N Markovic
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gesa Matnjani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Erin L McKean
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Cem Meço
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Salzburg Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Loren Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shorook Na'ara
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniel W Nuss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Gurston G Nyquist
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gretchen M Oakley
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kazuhiro Omura
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Richard R Orlandi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Nobuyoshi Otori
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Peter Papagiannopoulos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Zara M Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David G Pfister
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alkis J Psaltis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mindy R Rabinowitz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Murugappan Ramanathan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ryan Rimmer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Marc R Rosen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Olabisi Sanusi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Zoukaa B Sargi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Philippe Schafhausen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ahmad R Sedaghat
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Brent A Senior
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Raj Shrivastava
- Department of Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Raj Sindwani
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristine A Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - C Arturo Solares
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Satyan B Sreenath
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Aldo Stamm
- São Paulo ENT Center (COF), Edmundo Vasconcelos Complex, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Katharina Stölzel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Baran Sumer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Pavol Surda
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bobby A Tajudeen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Brian D Thorp
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charles C L Tong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Raymond K Tsang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Justin H Turner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mario Turri-Zanoni
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Aaron M Udager
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Thibaut van Zele
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kyle VanKoevering
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kevin C Welch
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sarah K Wise
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ian J Witterick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tae-Bin Won
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Stephanie N Wong
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Bradford A Woodworth
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Peter-John Wormald
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - William C Yao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chien-Fu Yeh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing Zhou
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vinciguerra A, Guichard JP, Verillaud B, Herman P. Extended sphenoidotomy combined with transpterygoid approach for sphenoidal sinus inverted papilloma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280:5369-5378. [PMID: 37414940 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08106-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Inverted papilloma of the sphenoid sinus (IPSS) is a rare tumor with debated surgical management due to its proximity to vital structures. The aim of this manuscript is to highlight the role of a transpterygoid approach (TPA) and pedicle-orientated strategy in case of involvement of critical structures in IPSS and compare it with data from the literature. METHODS Patients with primary IPSS between January 2000 and June 2021 were included. Pre-operative CT/MRI were analyzed to classify the pneumatization of the SS and predict the insertion point of the inverted papilloma. All patients were treated with a trans-sphenoidal approach which was combined with a TPA in case of lateral insertion point. A systematic search was also performed to summarize the available literature. RESULTS Twenty-two patients were treated for IPSS. By CT, the SS was categorized with type III pneumatization in 72.8% of cases. Eleven patients (50%) were treated with a TPA with a statistical association with the insertion point on the SS lateral wall (p = 0.01), rather than a SS pneumatization (p = 0.63). The overall success was 95.5% after a mean follow-up of 35.9 months. For the literature, 26 publications were included on 97 patients and described a trans-sphenoidal approach with a success rate of 84.6% after a mean follow-up of 24.5 months. CONCLUSION IPSS is generally treated with a sphenoidotomy approach, although in selected cases, a TPA should be preferred to expose the whole SS lateral wall though allowing a complete pedicled oriented resection of the tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Vinciguerra
- Otorhinolaryngology and Skull Base Center, AP-HP, Hospital Lariboisière, 2 Rue Ambroise Paré, 75010, Paris, France.
| | | | - Benjamin Verillaud
- Otorhinolaryngology and Skull Base Center, AP-HP, Hospital Lariboisière, 2 Rue Ambroise Paré, 75010, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Herman
- Otorhinolaryngology and Skull Base Center, AP-HP, Hospital Lariboisière, 2 Rue Ambroise Paré, 75010, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Plitt AR, Hong S, Choby GW, Van Gompel JJ. Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Sphenoid Sinus Inverted Papilloma with Carotid Artery Preservation: 2-Dimensional Operative Video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2023; 25:e100. [PMID: 37166988 DOI: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron R Plitt
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sukwoo Hong
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Garret W Choby
- Department of Tolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jamie J Van Gompel
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Tolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Miller PL, Walsh E, Cho DY, Woodworth BA, Grayson JW. Inverted Papilloma of the Middle Ear: Two New Cases and Systematic Review. ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY (PROVIDENCE, R.I.) 2022; 13:21526575221130711. [PMID: 36325130 PMCID: PMC9618760 DOI: 10.1177/21526575221130711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Inverted papillomas of the middle ear are extremely rare tumors that carry an increased risk of recurrence and malignant transformation. There are currently 59 cases of middle ear inverted papillomas reported in the literature. The objective in this study was to systematically evaluate outcomes regarding middle ear inverted papillomas with respect to demographics, anatomical tumor sites, malignant transformation status, recurrence rate and HPV status. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case series and systematic review. METHODS A systematic review was completed on June 25, 2020 with a search strategy including PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar. This revealed 181 articles. Full-text review was completed, and 66 articles were included. 115 articles were eliminated due to duplication of articles from databases, article titles not applicable to the aims of the systematic review and articles describing inverted papilloma of body sites other than middle ear. DISCUSSION Thirty-one cases of primary inverted papillomas of the middle ear were found in the literature with an additional 26 cases of secondary tumors. Four case reports did not specify primary versus secondary. The malignant transformation rate was 34.4% with a 53.6% recurrence rate. Treatment of middle ear inverted papillomas is primarily surgical with adjuvant radiation therapy considered for patients with recurrence or malignant transformation. Frequent clinical follow up of these patients is critical due to the increased rate of recurrence and malignant transformation. CONCLUSION Inverted papillomas of the middle ear are rare tumors that carry a high risk of recurrence and malignant transformation necessitating complete resection and frequent clinical follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter L. Miller
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham AL, USA
| | - Erika Walsh
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham AL, USA
| | - Do-Yeon Cho
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham AL, USA,Division of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Veterans Affairs Hospital, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Bradford A. Woodworth
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham AL, USA
| | - Jessica W. Grayson
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham AL, USA,Jessica W. Grayson, MD, FOT 1155, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Birkenbeuel JL, Pang JC, Lee A, Nguyen ES, Risbud A, Goshtasbi K, Abiri A, Lehrich BM, Tong CCL, Adappa ND, Palmer JN, Kuan EC. Long-term outcomes in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma arising from inverted papilloma: Systematic review. Head Neck 2022; 44:1014-1029. [PMID: 35141984 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Long-term survival and recurrence patterns of squamous cell carcinoma arising from inverted papilloma (IP-SCC) have not been thoroughly investigated. Four electronic databases were searched and primary studies describing overall survival (OS), recurrence, and mean time to recurrence of patients with IP-SCC were included for review. Our search yielded 662 studies. The 28 studies selected for inclusion identified 663 patients with IP-SCC. In 596 patients with reported T classification, 439 (73.7%) were T3/T4 on presentation. Of the 650 participants with recurrence data (local, regional, and distant), 155 (23.8%) experienced a recurrence, with an aggregate mean time-to-recurrence of 24.3 months. In 565 patients with 5-year OS rates, the aggregate 5-year OS was 62%. Based on the literature to date, IP-SCC is associated with a 5-year OS rate of 62%. 23.8% of patients experienced recurrence at a mean time of 24.3 months, suggesting the need for long-term surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack L Birkenbeuel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Jonathan C Pang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Ariel Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Emily S Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Adwight Risbud
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Khodayar Goshtasbi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Arash Abiri
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Brandon M Lehrich
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Charles C L Tong
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Edward C Kuan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Trent MS, Goshtasbi K, Hui L, Stuyt JAG, Adappa ND, Palmer JN, Kuan EC. A Systematic Review of Definitive Treatment for Inverted Papilloma Attachment Site and Associations With Recurrence. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 167:425-433. [PMID: 34637363 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211051975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Inverted papilloma (IP) is the most common benign neoplasm of the nasal cavity with known risk of recurrence. There is no standardized approach to definitive treatment for attachment sites. This systematic review aims to determine whether surgeon choice of technique differs by anatomic attachment site and whether different surgical techniques contribute to reduced rates of recurrence. DATA SOURCES PubMed and Ovid Medline. REVIEW METHODS A systematic review was conducted for studies reporting on IP. Those that included IP recurrence rates and primary tumor attachment site were reviewed. RESULTS Of 122 published studies, 14 met eligibility criteria, representing 585 patients and a recurrence rate of 5.8%. The maxillary sinus (50.9%) was the most common primary attachment site, and the sphenoid sinus was associated with the highest rate of recurrence (10.4%). The most utilized technique included debulking the tumor, removing mucosa over the attachment site, and drilling the underlying bone. The most common Krouse stage represented was T3 (53.3%). No single technique predicted a propensity for recurrence, but certain techniques are favored depending on IP attachment site. Finally, frozen sections to obtain evidence of clear margins intraoperatively significantly reduced rates of recurrence (3.4% vs 7.3%, P = .045). CONCLUSION Based on the current literature, the most common technique to address site of attachment involves resecting mucosa and drilling the tumor base. Choice of technique appears to differ for various sites of attachment. Use of intraoperative frozen section analysis appears to be associated with decreased recurrence overall. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica S Trent
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California-Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Khodayar Goshtasbi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California-Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Lily Hui
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California-Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - John A Gerka Stuyt
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kaiser Permanente Orange County, Anaheim, California, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Edward C Kuan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California-Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Treatment strategies for inverted papillomas with intracranial or intraorbital involvement. J Laryngol Otol 2021; 135:904-910. [PMID: 34429184 DOI: 10.1017/s0022215121002152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sinonasal inverted papillomas are challenging benign tumours of the nasal cavity because of their high recurrence rates and the lifetime malignant transformation risk of 10 per cent as well as their locally aggressive behaviour. This study aimed to describe treatment strategies for inverted papillomas with intracranial or intraorbital involvement. METHOD This was a prospective case series study of 18 patients with inverted papilloma with intracranial or intraorbital involvement. Patient demographic data, imaging, pathology, surgical technique and recurrences were recorded prospectively over a period of seven years. RESULTS A total of 83 per cent of the patients in this study had been previously operated on, consisting of 8 cases with intracranial involvement, 1 case with intraorbital involvement and 9 with both. During follow up with a medium of 37 months (range, 13-115 months) there were two recurrences. CONCLUSION It was postulated that intracranial or intraorbital involvement observed in this series was the result of multiple revisions. However, using accurate imaging protocols and the pedicle-oriented approach for tumour excision, complete tumour removal was achieved in most cases with minimal post-operative complications.
Collapse
|
8
|
McCormick JP, Suh JD, Lee JT, Wells C, Wang MB. Role of High-Risk HPV Detected by PCR in Malignant Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma: A Meta-Analysis. Laryngoscope 2021; 132:926-932. [PMID: 34232507 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prior studies suggest that there may be a link between human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and malignant sinonasal inverted papilloma (SNIP). This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to further evaluate this potential association. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review with meta-analysis. METHODS The Medline and Embase databases were used to identify case-control studies reporting the risk of malignant SNIP in patients with high-risk HPV subtypes identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Meta-analysis was performed to determine pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Twenty-one studies were identified, including a total of 841 subjects with SNIP. Seventeen studies were included in the final analysis, as four studies did not have any HPV-positive tumors in either group. A total of 56 malignant SNIP and 551 benign SNIP were ultimately identified. The pooled log-OR was 1.80 (95% CI: 1.03-2.57) for all high-risk HPV subtypes. Stratification by high-risk HPV subtype showed a log-OR of 1.67 (95% CI: 0.88-2.46) for HPV-16 and log-OR of 2.68 (95% CI: 1.30-4.05) for HPV-18. CONCLUSION Infection with high-risk HPV subtypes may be associated with an increased risk of malignant SNIP. HPV-18 showed the greatest overall average effect size of the common high-risk subtypes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE n/a Laryngoscope, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin P McCormick
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Jeffrey D Suh
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Jivianne T Lee
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Christine Wells
- Office of Information Technology-Statistical Computing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Marilene B Wang
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pähler A, Welkoborsky HJ. [Follow-up care of sinonasal papillomas - risk factors for recurrence and malignant progression]. Laryngorhinootologie 2021; 100:261-269. [PMID: 33784777 DOI: 10.1055/a-1211-2889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sinonasal papillomas are tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. They are treated through complete resection under oncologic conditions. Two characteristics complicate follow-up: 1) frequent tumor recurrences (even many years after initial diagnosis), 2) possibility for malignant progression. This review elucidates risk factors for these two characteristics to depict "high-risk patients" for whom a closer follow-up is mandatory. MATERIALS AND METHODS Literature was searched in Pubmed (NCBI). RESULTS The most important risk factor for recurrence is incomplete tumor resection. This comprises several more factors: inappropriate surgical procedure, large tumors, difficult surgical conditions due to tumor localization or to prior surgery. Young age and tobacco smoking are risk factors for frequent recurrences. In regard to malignant progression, extended tumors, smoking, senior age, female sex, bone invasion, and lack of inflammatory polyps have been identified as risk factors. Histopathological factors for both - recurrences and malignant progression - are epithelial dysplasia, hyperkeratosis, squamous hyperplasia, as well as (if known) increased proliferation, aneuploidy, and infection with human papillomaviruses. CONCLUSIONS Complete resection of sinunasal papillomas under oncologic conditions is of utmost importance. A careful postoperative follow-up is mandatory. Most authors suggest at least a five-year, some a lifelong follow-up. Patients with one or more risk factors should be monitored more closely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Pähler
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, KRH-Klinikum Nordstadt, Hannover, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Binz GHA, Soyka MB, Holzmann D, Meerwein CM. Need for long-term follow-up in sinonasal inverted papilloma: A Single-institution experience. Head Neck 2020; 43:630-638. [PMID: 33103314 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most studies on sinonasal inverted papillomas (SNIPs) regarding risk factors for recurrence, recurrence rates (RRs) and malignant transformation are biased by a significant proportion of revision cases. METHODS Retrospective study on patients with consecutive, treatment-naïve SNIPs at a tertiary referral center between 1999 and 2019. RESULTS Overall, RR was 9.8% (10 of 102 patients), with 2 of 10 recurrences (20%) occurring after more than 5 years. Histopathological workup revealed synchronous malignancy in 2 of 102 patients (2%). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly higher RR for SNIPs involving the frontal sinus (26.3% vs 6.0%, P = .02). No SNIPs primarily originating from the frontal sinus were observed. CONCLUSION Overall, RR of treatment-naïve SNIPs is comparably low; however, long-term follow-up is mandatory due to late recurrences. Secondary involvement of the frontal sinus was identified as risk factor for recurrence. No SNIPs primarily originating from frontal sinus were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregori H A Binz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael B Soyka
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David Holzmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian M Meerwein
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nilesh K, Mukherji S, Kanetkar SR, Vande A. Sinonasal inverted schneiderian papilloma presenting as a large intraoral lesion. BMJ Case Rep 2020; 13:13/7/e234985. [PMID: 32624487 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2020-234985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Sinonasal inverted schneiderian papilloma (ISP) is a rare tumour, which almost exclusively arises from the mucosa lining, the nasal cavity and the paranasal sinuses. The tumour in its early stages presents as an asymptomatic mass, which may be discovered during routine examination. Large lesions usually measure a few millimetres to centimetres in size and show symptoms such as nasal blockade, recurrent sinusitis, postnasal drip, anosmia, epistaxis, facial pain and headache. Lesion presenting as a large oral mass is extremely rare and may cause diagnostic dilemma, resulting in misdiagnosis. This report describes a rare case of ISP presenting as large intraoral lesion, with wide area of facial skeletal involvement. Diagnosis and management of the pathology has also been highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kumar Nilesh
- Oral & Maxillofacial surgery, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed University, Karad, Maharashtra, India
| | - Srijon Mukherji
- Calcutta Institute of Maxillofacial Surgery and Research, Kolkata, India
| | - Sujata R Kanetkar
- Department of Pathology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed University, Karad, Maharashtra, India
| | - Aaditee Vande
- Department of Prosthodontics, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed University, Karad, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Prognostic factors and risk factors for development and recurrence of sinonasal papillomas: potential role of different HPV subtypes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 277:767-775. [PMID: 31832748 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05747-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE AND METHODS A retrospective study was conducted to identify and assess potential clinical and molecularbiological risk factors for development and recurrence of sinonasal papillomas (i.e. inverted (IP), fungiform (FP), and oncocytic papillomas (OCP)). Investigated risk factors included age, gender, tumor size and localization, tobacco smoking, regular alcohol consumption, essential hypertension, anticoagulant medication, allergies, surgical approach, and HPV infection. Risk factors were evaluated by regression analysis. RESULTS Apart from age and incomplete tumor resection, the recurrence of Schneiderian papillomas is independent of conventional risk factors. Patients in this study displayed higher HPV infections rates in IP (38.8%) and in FP (100%) than in healthy mucosa, which is reported 0-5.8% in Germany and central Europe. The proportion of HPV-positive IP decreased with advanced tumor stages: 100% HPV positivity of T1 IP (2/2), 40.9% of T2 IP (9/22), and 35.7% of T3 IP (20/56). Most commonly detected HPV types were HPV 6, 11, and 16; however, patients in this study also displayed HPV types that have rarely or not at all been described in sinonasal papillomas before, such as HPV 58, 42, 83, and 91. Recurrent sinonasal papillomas displayed higher rates of HPV infections than non-recurrent tumors. CONCLUSIONS Young age at initial diagnosis and incomplete tumor resection are risk factors for recurrence of sinonasal papillomas. Our data suggest that HPV infection supports development and/or perpetuation of sinonasal papillomas. Additionally, sinonasal papillomas seem to display a unique subset of HPV genotypes, including genotypes that have not often been described before.
Collapse
|
13
|
Tong CCL, Patel NN, Maina IW, Triantafillou V, Yan CH, Kuan EC, Kohanski MA, Papagiannopoulos P, Workman AD, Cohen NA, Kennedy DW, Adappa ND, Palmer JN. Inverted papilloma with multifocal attachment is associated with increased recurrence. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2019; 9:865-869. [PMID: 31125506 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inverted papilloma (IP) is a benign sinonasal tumor with a well-known propensity to recur, especially at its bony attachment site. Anecdotal evidence suggests lower rate of recurrence in primary resection. We also aimed to evaluate the effect of multifocal vs single focus of attachment in disease control. METHODS This work is a retrospective review of 535 IP resections performed during the period from 2006 to 2016 at a tertiary-care center. Demographic data, tumor location and attachment sites, and follow-up duration data were obtained. RESULTS Two hundred ten patients were eligible for analysis. The mean age was 57 years, with an average postoperative surveillance of 36.4 months. Patients who had a previous procedure at an outside institution have a recurrence rate of 22.3%, compared with 12.4% for patients who had primary surgery at our institution. The most common site of attachment was maxillary sinus (47.6%), followed by ethmoid sinus (39%). Individual tumor review showed 50% of the patients to have multifocal attachment disease, of which there is a higher prevalence in secondary cases when compared with primary cases (53.7% vs 44.9%). Multiple tumor attachment sites had a significant effect on recurrence (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-7.6; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION Primary resection and single-focus attachment of inverted papilloma are associated with lower recurrence rates at 3-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles C L Tong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Neil N Patel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ivy W Maina
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Vasiliki Triantafillou
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Carol H Yan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Edward C Kuan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michael A Kohanski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Peter Papagiannopoulos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alan D Workman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Noam A Cohen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA
| | - David W Kennedy
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee JJ, Roland LT, Licata JJ, Orlowski HLP, Jiramongkolchai P, Piccirillo JF, Kallogjeri D, Klatt-Cromwell CN, Chernock RD, Schneider JS. Morphologic, intraoperative, and histologic risk factors for sinonasal inverted papilloma recurrence. Laryngoscope 2019; 130:590-596. [PMID: 31112326 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sinonasal inverted papillomas (IP) are benign neoplasms with a propensity for local recurrence. Many risk factors are reported, with little consistency between studies. This study aimed to comprehensively assess for demographic, imaging, histopathologic, and intraoperative risk factors for recurrence. METHODS We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with pathologically diagnosed IP without malignancy who underwent surgical resection between 1997 and 2018. Eligible patients were identified through a database maintained by the Department of Pathology. Logistic regression identified variables associated with recurrence, and conjunctive consolidation was performed to create a predictive model. RESULTS Of 76 subjects, 37% (n = 28) had recurrence. Median follow-up and time to recurrence were 2.9 (range 0.5-21.1) and 1.7 (range 0.2-13.0) years, respectively. Confirmed negative margins on histology were protective (odds ratio [OR] 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.85). Frontal sinus involvement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.83, 95% CI 1.20-28.37), incomplete resection (aOR 9.67, 95% CI 2.24-41.72), and presence of dysplasia (aOR 4.38, 95% CI 1.01-19.10) were significantly associated with recurrence on multivariable analysis. A three-level composite recurrence risk staging system was created by consolidating the above three variables. The recurrence risks of composite stage I, II, and III disease were 20%, 38%, and 100%, respectively. No demographic, imaging, staging, or surgical approach variables were associated with recurrence. CONCLUSION Frontal sinus involvement, incomplete resection, and dysplasia were significant risk factors for IP recurrence, whereas confirmed negative margins were protective. Creation of a composite staging system using the above variables may allow for risk stratification and a patient-specific approach to postoperative IP management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 130:590-596, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake J Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Lauren T Roland
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A
| | - Jordan J Licata
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Hilary L P Orlowski
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Pawina Jiramongkolchai
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jay F Piccirillo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Dorina Kallogjeri
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Cristine N Klatt-Cromwell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Rebecca D Chernock
- Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - John S Schneider
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Coutinho G, Marques J, Leal M, Spratley J, Fernandes MS, Santos M. Surgical outcomes of sinonasal inverted papilloma: a 17 year review. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 86:315-320. [PMID: 30852156 PMCID: PMC9422424 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Revised: 12/02/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Inverted papillomas represent one of the most common benign neoplasic lesions located in the sinonasal tract. Owing to the local erosive behavior, tendency to recur and the potential for malignant transformation, surgical management of inverted papillomas is often challenging. Objective This study aimed to analyze the surgical outcomes of patients with inverted papillomas, according to the Krouse staging and the different surgical approaches. Methods Retrospective study of patients diagnosed with sinonasal inverted papillomas who underwent surgical treatment between 2000 and 2016 at a tertiary referral hospital. Cases with follow-up less than 12 months were excluded. The rate and the time of recurrence were the main outcomes. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Thirty-six cases with mean age of 60 years, predominantly male (72%), were included. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 16 years, with an average of 4.5 years. Krouse T1 Stage corresponded to 11.1%; T2 occurred in 50% of cases; while T3 and T4 Stages accounted for 30.6% and 8.3% of patients, respectively. Most cases were approached by an endoscopic technique alone (83.3%), with a recurrence rate of 13.3%. Patients treated via a combined or open approach revealed a recurrence of 16.7%. No differences in the recurrence rate were reported when comparing endoscopic surgery with the open or combined techniques. Krouse Stage T3 had a significant association with inverted papillomas recurrence (p = 0.023). All inverted papilloma relapses occurred up to 2 years post-operatively. One case of malignant transformation was recorded (2.7%). Conclusion Endoscopic surgery did not increase the recurrence rates and can be a safe and efficient alternative to open or combined techniques. The recurrence of inverted papillomas seem to be related to the persistence of the disease and tend to occur early after primary surgery. Krouse T3 Stages may be associated with a higher recurrence of inverted papillomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gil Coutinho
- Centro Hospitalar São João, Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia, Porto, Portugal; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Unidade de Otorrinolaringologia, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Joana Marques
- Centro Hospitalar São João, Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia, Porto, Portugal; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Unidade de Otorrinolaringologia, Porto, Portugal
| | - Manuel Leal
- Centro Hospitalar São João, Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia, Porto, Portugal; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Unidade de Otorrinolaringologia, Porto, Portugal
| | - Jorge Spratley
- Centro Hospitalar São João, Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia, Porto, Portugal; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Unidade de Otorrinolaringologia, Porto, Portugal; Centro de Investigação em Tecnologia e Serviços de Saúde (CINTESIS), Porto, Portugal
| | - Margarida Sá Fernandes
- Centro Hospitalar São João, Departamento de Patologia, Porto, Portugal; Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Patologia, Porto, Portugal
| | - Margarida Santos
- Centro Hospitalar São João, Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Meng Y, Fang G, Wang X, Song X, Wang K, Lou H, She W, Qin L, Lv M, Zhang T, Yuan T, Tao Y, Meng X, Zhang L, Wang C. Origin site-based staging system of sinonasal inverted papilloma for application to endoscopic sinus surgery. Head Neck 2018; 41:440-447. [PMID: 30554455 PMCID: PMC6590184 DOI: 10.1002/hed.25435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Revised: 07/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to assess the recurrence risk of sinonasal inverted papillomas (SNIPs), based on a staging system developed according to the originating site of SNIP. Methods A total of 200 patients with SNIP were enrolled, and a staging system was developed based on the originating sites and corresponding recurrence rates of tumor in the patients. In the verification phase, 675 patients with SNIPs were enrolled as above, and the originating sites of the SNIPs were confirmed by an endoscopic sinus surgery. Cluster analysis was performed to determine the stage for each SNIP. Results Overall, 608 patients completed the study. SNIP recurrence rates for stages 1‐4 were 0 (n = 43), 4.0% (n = 420), 13.4% (n = 134), 36.4% (n = 11), respectively (total = 6.4%). Conclusions The origin site‐based classification of SNIP may aid surgeons in selecting appropriate endoscopic surgical approaches to minimize the risk of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Meng
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Gaoli Fang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiangdong Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohong Song
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Kuiji Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongfei Lou
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wenyu She
- Department of Allergy, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Long Qin
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Capital Medical University, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Mei Lv
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Liaoning, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of JiNan University, Guangdong, China
| | - Tiejun Yuan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong, China
| | - Yanli Tao
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong, China
| | - Xun Meng
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of JiNan University, Guangdong, China
| | - Luo Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Department of Allergy, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing, China
| | - Chengshuo Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
In this review we provide comprehensive analysis of the imaging features of diseases affecting the sphenoid sinus, including a large and heterogeneous spectrum of pathologies such as sinusitis, pseudotumours, bony pathologies, and tumours. Clinical symptomatology related to sphenoid pathologies is often non-specific and patient clinical examination and endoscopic investigations are not definitive; thus, radiological imaging is mandatory for diagnosis. Strengths and limitations of both morphological and functional imaging methods such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and combined positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) have been considered and integrated into a well-defined clinical context in order to recognise specific imaging features and to underline their clinical relevance for an early and accurate diagnosis. An overview of several sphenoid conditions is herein selected with a didactic objective including both common and less common diseases.
Collapse
|
18
|
The clinical behavior of sinonasal inverted papilloma with cellular dysplasia: case series and review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274:3375-3382. [PMID: 28597339 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4629-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2017] [Accepted: 05/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The prognosis and recurrence rate of inverted papilloma (IP) with concomitant cellular dysplasia are not well-delineated. Demographic, clinical and imaging data of all patients who were surgically treated for sinonasal inverted papilloma (SNIP) in our center between 1996 and 2013 were reviewed. Data regarding the coexistence of dysplastic changes or malignancy within the resected tissues were also retrieved. After the exclusion of malignant cases and patients who were lost for follow-up, 92 patients were included in the study. Five patients had coexisting cellular dysplasia (4.7%), four of them had severe dysplasia and one had mild-to-moderate dysplasia. All four cases with severe dysplasia recurred, three were primarily treated endoscopically and one by external approach. Only the case with mild to moderate dysplasia which had been treated by subcranial approach did not recur. Patients with dysplasia had significantly higher recurrence rate than patients without dysplasia (80 vs. 14%, p = 0.019). This significant relation between histology and recurrence remained even after adjustment to tumor extent. The adjusted odd ratio of dysplasia (dysplasia vs. no dysplasia) is 9.7, p = 0.043. SNIP with dysplasia should be treated aggressively and followed closely. The histopathologic investigation of SNIP specimens should always note the presence of dysplasia and its severity. Further investigation on the clinical behavior of SNIP with dysplasia is needed. Multicenter studies are warranted due to the rarity of dysplastic SNIP.
Collapse
|
19
|
Kuan EC, Frederick JW, Palma Diaz MF, Lim DW, Suh JD. Complete response of skull base inverted papilloma to chemotherapy: Case report. ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY 2017; 8:105-108. [PMID: 28583236 PMCID: PMC5468755 DOI: 10.2500/ar.2017.8.0201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background: Inverted papilloma (IP) is the most common benign sinonasal neoplasm. Endoscopic techniques, improved understanding of pathophysiology, and novel surgical approaches have allowed rhinologists to treat IPs more effectively, with surgery being the mainstay of therapy. Frontal sinus IP poses a challenge for surgical therapy due to complex anatomy and potentially difficult surgical access. Objectives: We reported a unique case of a massive frontal sinus IP that presented with intracranial and orbital extension, with near resolution after chemotherapy. Methods: A retrospective case review of a patient with a frontal sinus IP treated at a tertiary academic medical center. Results: A 75-year-old male patient presented with nasal obstruction, purulent nasal discharge, and a growing left supraorbital mass. Endoscopy demonstrated a mass that filled both frontal and ethmoid sinuses, with orbital invasion. There also was substantial erosion of the posterior table, which measured 1.73 × 1.40 cm. A biopsy specimen demonstrated IP with carcinoma in situ. The patient was deemed unresectable on initial evaluation and, subsequently, underwent chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel). The tumor had a dramatic response to chemotherapy, and the patient elected for definitive surgery to remove any residual disease. During surgery, only a small focus of IP was found along the superior wall of the frontal sinus. No tumor was found elsewhere, including at the site of skull base erosion. The final pathology was IP without carcinoma in situ or dysplasia. Conclusion: This was the first reported case of chemotherapeutic “debulking” of IP, which facilitated surgical resection, despite substantial intracranial and orbital involvement. Although nearly all IPs can be treated surgically, rare cases, such as unresectable tumors, may benefit from systemic chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C. Kuan
- From the Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - John W. Frederick
- From the Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Miguel F. Palma Diaz
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, and
| | - Dean W. Lim
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Jeffrey D. Suh
- From the Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sun Q, An L, Zheng J, Zhu D. Advances in recurrence and malignant transformation of sinonasal inverted papillomas. Oncol Lett 2017; 13:4585-4592. [PMID: 28599459 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2016] [Accepted: 01/26/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Sinonasal inverted papilloma (SIP) is a benign tumor of the nasal cavity and sinus. SIP is characterized by aggressive malignant transformation and a high rate of recurrence. Inadequate removal of the tumor during surgery is one of the most significant contributors to SIP recurrence. A growing body of evidence suggests that molecular alteration in SIP, including human papilloma virus infections, single nucleotide polymorphisms of key genes, deregulation of signaling pathways and immunological changes, may lead to SIP occurrence and malignant transformation. However, the extent to which these molecular mechanisms contribute to SIP pathology and transformation remains unclear due to limited research. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the primary dependent factors that contribute to SIP etiology. The present article reviewed risk factors of progression and recurrence of SIP, including outdoor and industrial occupational exposure, smoking, septal deviation, SIP location, recurrent cases, stage of SIP-associated squamous cell carcinoma and choice of surgical method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingjia Sun
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130033, P.R. China
| | - Lifeng An
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130033, P.R. China
| | - Jun Zheng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130033, P.R. China
| | - Dongdong Zhu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130033, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Akkari M, Lassave J, Mura T, Gascou G, Pierre G, Cartier C, Garrel R, Crampette L. Atypical presentations of sinonasal inverted papilloma: Surgical management and influence on the recurrence rate. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2016; 30:149-54. [PMID: 26980397 DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal inverted papilloma (SNIP), classically, is a unilateral benign tumor of the nasal lateral wall. Numerous variations have been observed, depending on location, bilateral presentation, or association with nasal polyposis. OBJECTIVE The aim of this work was to describe atypical presentations of SNIPs with their management specificities and to assess their influence on the recurrence rate in a large case series. METHODS A retrospective single center study of 110 patients treated for SNIP. Atypical inverted papillomas were identified according to the following criteria: (1) unusual location (frontal, posterior, anterior), (2) bilateral involvement, and (3) association with nasal polyposis. Surgical management was detailed, and the influence of each atypical group on recurrence was assessed by using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the log-rank test. RESULTS Distribution of atypical presentations was as follows: frontal sinus localization (10.9%); posterior localization, including sphenoid sinus (9%); nasal anterior localization (3.6%); bilateral involvement (3.6%); and nasal polyposis association (10%). The surgical approach was endoscopic (74.5%), external (5.5%), or combined endoscopic and external (20%). Except for nasal anterior localization, all the groups were associated with a higher recurrence rate, without reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSION Recurrence rates for these atypical presentations arise from their specific surgical challenges. The choice of the surgical technique is guided by tumor location and extension, and by the surgeon's experience; the main objective is a complete resection. The endoscopic endonasal approach is the most frequent procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Akkari
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Gui de Chauliac, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang MJ, Noel JE. Etiology of sinonasal inverted papilloma: A narrative review. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 3:54-58. [PMID: 29204580 PMCID: PMC5683660 DOI: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2016.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2016] [Revised: 11/18/2016] [Accepted: 11/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP) is a benign and uncommon tumor of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses with a tendency for recurrence and even malignant transformation. Though the morphology and clinical behavior of this lesion has been well described, its etiology remains controversial. Methods Computerized searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Google scholar through May 2015. In this review, etiologic factors including human papilloma virus (HPV), Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), cell cycle related proteins and angiogenic factors, occupational and environmental exposures, and chronic inflammation, will be discussed. Results Many studies indicate that HPV has been detected in a significant percentage of IP, while EBV has not been shown to be significantly associated. Certain cell cycle regulatory factors and angiogenic proteins contribute to the dysregulation of proliferation and apoptosis, and facilitate migration and tumor invasion. Occupational exposures, such as welding and organic solvents, have been implicated, and smoking seems more critical to recurrence and dysplasia rather than initial IP occurrence. Chronic inflammation may also have a causative relationship with inverted papilloma, but the mechanism is unclear. Conclusions Though etiology of sinonasal IP remains controversial, the studies reviewed here indicate a role for viral infection, cell cycle and angiogenic factors, environmental and occupational exposure, and chronic inflammation. Further study on etiologic factors is necessary for clinical guidance and therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Jie Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Julia E Noel
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Benign Primary Neoplasms. CURRENT OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s40136-016-0138-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
24
|
Elliot A, Marklund L, Håkansson N, Song H, Ye W, Stjärne P, Hammarstedt-Nordenvall L. Incidence of IP and risk of malignant transformation in the Swedish population 1960-2010. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 274:1445-1448. [PMID: 27757542 PMCID: PMC5309288 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4321-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2016] [Accepted: 09/23/2016] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The true incidence of inverted papilloma (IP) is not yet known. From hospital-based studies, its incidence has been estimated to approximately 0.5/100,000 person years. Earlier hospital case studies have shown that IP can undergo a malignant transformation in 1-53 %. The frequency of its malignant transformation on a population basis is unknown. To our knowledge, no standardised incidence ratio (SIR) has been reported for malignancies among IPs. This study aims to investigate these incidences on a population basis. Using the data from the Swedish Cancer Registry (SCR), we have identified patients with IP and patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) diagnosed between 1960 and 2010 in Sweden. Incidence of IP and incidence of SCC among patients with IP and SIR were analyzed. Eight hundred and fourteen patients with IP were identified. The incidence of IPs reported to the SCR increased from 1960 to 2010. In this cohort, SCC was overrepresented, as compared with the general population. The incidence of IP in the Swedish population seems to have increased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Elliot
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Linda Marklund
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Niclas Håkansson
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Huan Song
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Weimin Ye
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pär Stjärne
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lalle Hammarstedt-Nordenvall
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kim JS, Kwon SH. Recurrence of sinonasal inverted papilloma following surgical approach: A meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2016; 127:52-58. [PMID: 27531693 DOI: 10.1002/lary.26222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Revised: 06/17/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS Inverted papilloma (IP) is a rare benign tumor, which is found in the sinonasal area. It is characterized by recurrence, local destruction, and malignant change. Of these, recurrence is a challenging problem to many otolaryngologists. In this study, we evaluated recurrence based on the type of surgical approach using a meta-analysis. STUDY DESIGN MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane database. METHODS Relevant studies were identified by searching the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane through February 2016. Random-effects models were used to estimate risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of cohort studies. RESULTS Our search yielded 14 retrospective cohort studies involving a total of 696 endoscopic approaches and 444 nonendoscopic approaches. The pooled RR for IP recurrence (endoscopic vs. external approach) was 0.56 [95% CI: 0.36-0.85, I2 =48.3%]. A subgroup analysis was also performed. CONCLUSIONS Surgical management of IP via an endoscopic approach reduces the risk of recurrence compared to an external approach. Although further data are needed, early- stage IP requires endoscopic or endoscopic-assisted surgery to reduce the risk of tumor recurrence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE NA Laryngoscope, 127:52-58, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Seung Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea.,Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Sam Hyun Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea.,Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Grayson JW, Khichi SS, Cho DY, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Management Strategies for Skull Base Inverted Papilloma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 155:179-83. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599816639019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2015] [Accepted: 02/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Objective Inverted papilloma attached to the ventral skull base presents a surgical dilemma because surgical removal of the bony pedicle is critical to decrease risk of recurrence. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of endoscopic management of skull base inverted papilloma. Study Design Case series with planned data collection. Setting Tertiary medical center. Subjects Patients with skull base inverted papilloma. Methods Over 7 years, 49 patients with skull base inverted papilloma were referred for surgical resection. Demographics, operative technique, pathology, complications, recurrence, and postoperative follow-up were evaluated. Results Average age at presentation was 57 years. Twenty-six patients (53%) had prior attempts at resection elsewhere, and 5 had squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) arising in an inverted papilloma. Six patients (12%) suffered major complications, including skull base osteomyelitis in 2 previously irradiated patients, cerebrospinal fluid leak with pneumocephalus (n = 1), meningitis (n = 1), invasive fungal sinusitis (n = 1), and cerebrovascular accident (n = 1). The mean disease-free interval was 29 months (range, 10-78 months). One patient with SCCA recurred in the nasopharynx (overall 2% recurrence rate). He is disease-free 3 years following endoscopic nasopharyngectomy. Three patients with SCCA had endoscopic resection of the skull base, while 1 subject with inverted papilloma pedicled on the superior orbital roof had an osteoplastic flap in conjunction with a Draf III procedure. All others received endoscopic resection. Conclusions Removal of the bony pedicle resulted in excellent local control of skull base inverted papillomas. Our experience demonstrates that disease eradication with limited morbidity is attainable with this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica W. Grayson
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Alabama–Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Sunny S. Khichi
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Alabama–Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Do-Yeon Cho
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Alabama–Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Kristen O. Riley
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama–Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Bradford A. Woodworth
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama–Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|