Steroid intracochlear distribution differs by administration method: Systemic versus intratympanic injection

[Role of intratympanic glucocorticoid treatment in sudden hearing loss]

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is one of the most common diseases in otolaryngology. Its etiology remains unknown. Furthermore, there is only a low level of evidence for the efficacy of established treatment modalities. In addition to systemic glucocorticoids, intratympanic corticosteroid treatment (ICT) has become increasingly important for treatment of ISSNHL. Different application strategies and treatment regimens have been described; however, uniform standards do not yet exist. ICT may be used for primary treatment as well as salvage therapy. Current data from meta-analyses show no benefit of intratympanic versus systemic primary therapy for sudden hearing loss (moderate evidence) but suggest a benefit of intratympanic secondary treatment over no treatment or placebo (high effect size, low evidence). Regarding combination of systemic and local glucocorticoid therapy in primary treatment of hearing loss, there may be a small benefit over systemic treatment alone (low effect size, low evidence).

Intratympanic dexamethasone in Manières disease and symptom control

BACKGROUND

Manières disease (MD) is a chronic inner ear disease characterized by recurrent vertigo and fluctuation in auditory symptoms. Vertigo spells have a sudden onset and are difficult for patients to handle. Therefore, treating a patient with MD is still a challenge for clinicians.

AIMS

This study aims to analyse the short-term effects of intratympanic dexamethasone (ITD) on the various symptoms of unilateral MD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study comprised 27 patients with unilateral MD and severe vertigo who failed medication therapy. Treatment was with ITD as an alternative to destructive therapy. Treatment is evaluated after four months.

RESULTS

Significant improvements were measured with Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), frequency of vertigo attacks longer than 20 min, Functional Level Scale (FLS), and tinnitus sensation measured by the Analog Visual Scale (AVS). Patients with severe symptoms grading with DHI and THI experienced the most improvement. Patients have achieved substantial vertigo control in 73%.

CONCLUSION

ITD application shows improvement in controlling vertigo and tinnitus in patients under exacerbation in MD.

SIGNIFICANCE

It is a promising non-destructive addition to the 'stepwise treatment concept' in MD and can be used as a first-line treatment in vertigo control.

Evaluation of Sudden Sensory-Neural Hearing Loss Patients Treated with Systemic Steroids with Additional Intratympanic Dexamethasone Injection in Different Intervals; a Clinical Trial Study

Sudden Sensory-Neural Hearing Loss (SSNHL) is one of the most important otologic emergency. Although adding intratympanic (IT) steroids to systematic steroid may be beneficial, the exact timing of the IT injections to provide the best response needs further investigations. To compare different protocols in treting sudden sensorineural hearing loss. We performed a clinical trial study on 120 patients from October 2021 to February 2022. All patients were prescribed 1 mg/Kg daily oral prednisolone. After randomization to three groups, the control group received standard twice a week IT steroid injections in 12 days (four total injections) while intervention groups 1 and 2 received once and twice a day IT injections for ten days. Audiometric study repeated 10-14 days after the last injection and assessed based on the Siegel criteria. We used the Chi-Square, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis's tests where appropriate. The most clinical improvement was found in the standard treatment group, and group-2 had the greatest number of patients with no improvement; however, no overall significant difference was observed among the three groups (p-value: 0.066; Pearson Chi-Square). Less frequent IT injections in patients already on systemic steroids provide similar results to more frequent injections.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03641-4.

Safety and audiological outcome in a case series of tertiary therapy of sudden hearing loss with a biodegradable drug delivery implant for controlled release of dexamethasone to the inner ear

Background

Intratympanic injections of glucocorticoids have become increasingly common in the treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL). However, due to their fast elimination, sustained applications have been suggested for local drug delivery to the inner ear.

Materials and methods

The study is based on a retrospective chart review of patients treated for ISSHL at a single tertiary (university) referral center. We included patients who were treated with a solid, biodegradable, poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)-based drug delivery system providing sustained delivery of dexamethasone extracochlear into the round window niche (n = 15) or intracochlear into scala tympani (n = 2) for tertiary therapy of ISSHL in patients without serviceable hearing after primary systemic and secondary intratympanic glucocorticoid therapy. We evaluated the feasibility and safety through clinical evaluation, histological examination, and functional tests [pure-tone threshold (PTA), word recognition scores (WRS)].

Results

With adequate surgical preparation of the round window niche, implantation was feasible in all patients. Histologic examination of the material in the round window niche showed signs of resorption without relevant inflammation or foreign body reaction to the implant. In patients where the basal part of scala tympani was assessable during later cochlear implantation, no pathological findings were found. In the patients with extracochlear application, average preoperative PTA was 84.7 dB HL (SD: 20.0) and 76.7 dB HL (SD: 16.7) at follow-up (p = 0.08). The preoperative average maximum WRS was 14.6% (SD: 17.9) and 39.3% (SD: 30.7) at follow-up (p = 0.11). Six patients (40%), however, reached serviceable hearing. The two patients with intracochlear application did not improve.

Conclusion

The extracochlear application of the controlled release system in the round window niche and – based on limited observations - intracochlear implantation into scala tympani appears feasible and safe. Due to the uncontrolled study design, conclusions about the efficacy of the treatment are limited. These observations, however, may encourage the initiation of prospective controlled studies using biodegradable controlled release implants as drug delivery systems for the treatment of inner ear diseases.

Local Delivery of Therapeutics to the Cochlea Using Nanoparticles and Other Biomaterials

Hearing loss negatively impacts the well-being of millions of people worldwide. Systemic delivery of ototherapeutics has limited efficacy due to severe systemic side effects and the presence of the blood–labyrinth barrier that selectively limits or enables transfer of molecules between plasma and inner ear tissues and fluids. Local drug delivery into the middle and inner ear would be preferable for many newly emerging classes of drugs. Although the cochlea is a challenging target for drug delivery, recent technologies could provide a safe and efficacious delivery of ototherapeutics. Local drug delivery routes include topical delivery via the external auditory meatus, retroauricular, transtympanic, and intracochlear delivery. Many new drug delivery systems specifically for the inner ear are under development or undergoing clinical studies. Future studies into these systems may provide a means for extended delivery of drugs to preserve or restore hearing in patients with hearing disorders. This review outlines the anatomy of the (inner) ear, describes the various local delivery systems and routes, and various quantification methodologies to determine the pharmacokinetics of the drugs in the inner ear.

Safety and Efficacy of Intratympanic Histamine Injection as an Adjuvant to Dexamethasone in a Noise-induced Murine Model

The safety and efficacy of intratympanic (IT) histamine (HIS) injection as an adjuvant to increase the inner ear penetration of dexamethasone (DEX) was investigated in this study. IT injections of DEX-only, 1% HIS+DEX and 4% HIS+DEX were performed in mice with noise-induced hearing loss. An inflammatory reaction in the middle ear was observed only in the 4% HIS+DEX group although no serious cytotoxic effects on the organ of Corti (OC) were observed at that concentration. Compared with the DEX-only group, the perilymphatic concentration of DEX was approximately two times higher in the 1% HIS+DEX group and approximately five times higher in the 4% HIS+DEX group. The expression of the DEX receptor in the cochlea was significantly increased in the 4%-HIS+DEX group. HIS appeared to induce transient damage the microstructure of the RWM with recovery observed within 3 weeks. The 1% and 4% HIS + DEX groups showed a significant recovery of the OC compared with the control group and they also achieved significantly better hearing restoration at 8 kHz in the DPOAE hearing test (P < .05) when compared to the DEX-only group. IT HIS temporarily disrupts the structure of the RWM and middle ear mucosa and significantly enhances the inner ear penetration of DEX. Therefore, IT HIS injection could be a simple and effective adjuvant therapy to increase perilymph concentration of DEX and achieve OC recovery after cochlear damage.

[Corticosteroids for acute sensorineural hearing loss treatment. The contemporary state of problem. Literature review. Part 1]

The article presents modern literary data relating to the expediency of the purpose of glucocorticosteroids in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) of various genes. In detail, the radar molecular mechanisms and the anatomo-physiological features of the exposure to the inner ear, side effects, the introduction methods, their comparative efficacy and modern schemes of the SSHL.

[Glucocorticosteroids in the treatment of acute neurosensory hearing loss. The current state of the problem. Part 2]

Modern literature data are presented on the choice of a drug for hormonal therapy in acute neurosensory hearing loss of various origins, the doses used for systemic therapy, the features and methods of intratympanic administration of glucocorticosteroids, and the evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment with this group of drugs.

Effect of Dexamethasone Combination with Gentamicin in Chemical Labyrinthectomy on Hearing Preservation and Vertigo Control in Patients with Unilateral Meniere's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Chemical labyrinthectomy using gentamicin is a popular method for treating intractable vertigo attacks in Meniere’s disease. However, the risk of hearing loss remains a major concern for clinicians. We investigated the effect of simultaneous dexamethasone and gentamicin application on hearing preservation and vertigo control in patients with intractable unilateral Meniere’s disease. A single-institutional, prospective, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted. Gentamicin-soaked Gelfoam^® was directly applied on the oval window following middle ear exploration. On the round window, dexamethasone-soaked Gelfoam^® was applied in the gentamicin with dexamethasone group (GD group, n = 18), and saline-soaked Gelfoam^® was applied in the gentamicin with sham reagent group (GO group, n = 19). The hearing change 8 weeks after the procedure and vertigo control 2–12 months after the procedure were investigated. The high-frequency hearing threshold was significantly increased in the GO group (p = 0.005 and 0.012 for 4 and 8 kHz, respectively), but not in the GD group. The short-term (2–6 months) vertigo control was more successful in the GD group (57.89% vs. 94.44%, p = 0.019), but long-term control (6–12 months) was insignificant. In conclusion, the combined application of gentamicin and dexamethasone in chemical labyrinthectomy is an effective method for protecting high-frequency hearing and vertigo control.

Analysis of Pharmacokinetics in the Cochlea of the Inner Ear

Hearing loss affects >5% of the global population and therefore, has a great social and clinical impact. Sensorineural hearing loss, which can be caused by different factors, such as acoustic trauma, aging, and administration of certain classes of drugs, stems primarily from a dysfunction of the cochlea in the inner ear. Few therapeutic strategies against sensorineural hearing loss are available. To develop effective treatments for this disease, it is crucial to precisely determine the behavior of ototoxic and therapeutic agents in the microenvironment of the cochlea in live animals. Since the 1980s, a number of studies have addressed this issue by different methodologies. However, there is much less information on pharmacokinetics in the cochlea than that in other organs; the delay in ontological pharmacology is likely due to technical difficulties with accessing the cochlea, a tiny organ that is encased with a bony wall and has a fine and complicated internal structure. In this review, we not only summarize the observations and insights obtained in classic and recent studies on pharmacokinetics in the cochlea but also describe relevant analytical techniques, with their strengths, limitations, and prospects.

A New CT Parameter for Predicting Residual Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: The "Basal Turn-Facial Ridge Angle"

OBJECTIVES

We suggest a simple measurement, called the "basal turn-facial ridge (BT-FR) angle," for determining the electrode insertion axis using preoperative temporal bone computed tomography (CT) to predict hearing preservation (HP) in cochlear implantation (CI).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Eighty-two ears that underwent CI between 2010 and 2018 were included. Ears with preoperative thresholds less than or equal to 80 dB HL at 125, 250, and 500 Hz were enrolled and grouped using the criteria of Skarżyński et al.: Group 1, complete or partial HP; Group 2, minimal HP or complete hearing loss.

INTERVENTION

All subjects underwent CI with soft surgery techniques through the round window approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The BT-FR angle is the angle between the basal turn line (BT-line), which is a straight line passing through the center of the longitudinal axis of the BT, and the facial ridge line, which is a straight line running from the endpoint of the BT-line to a point just above the facial ridge.

RESULTS

The BT-FR angle was 2.5 ± 2.9 degrees in Group 1 and -0.3 ± 2.7 degrees in Group 2 (p = 0.003). The angle and hearing loss showed a significant negative correlation (r = -0.401, p = 0.002). In multiple linear regression, "age at operation" (β coefficient 0.260; p = 0.001) and the "BT-FR angle" (-1.967; p = 0.001) were significant variables affecting the degree of residual hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The BT-FR angle, which can be measured simply, may be useful to predict residual HP after CI.

The Physiologic Role of Corticosteroids in Menière's Disease: An Update on Glucocorticoid-mediated Pathophysiology and Corticosteroid Inner Ear Distribution

: There are multiple treatment options for Ménière's disease (MD), including dietary modifications, aminoglycoside therapy, and surgery. All have limitations, ranging from limited effectiveness to permanent hearing loss. Corticosteroids have long been used to manage MD due to their relative efficacy and tolerability, but the exact mechanism for disease alleviation is uncertain. Until recently, the precise distribution and role that glucocorticoid receptors play in inner ear diseases have remained largely uninvestigated. Several studies propose they influence mechanisms of fluid regulation through ion and water homeostasis. This review will provide an update on the basic science literature describing the activity of endogenous glucocorticoids and exogenous corticosteroids in the inner ear and the relevance to MD, as well as early clinical trial data pertaining to the application of novel technologies for more effective administration of corticosteroids for the treatment of MD.

Dexamethasone delivery for hearing preservation in animal cochlear implant model: continuity, long-term release, and fast release rate

Background: Clinically, steroids have been used for hearing preservation both topically and systemically during cochlear implantation.Objective: This study compared steroid efficacy for hearing preservation among different types of delivery modes using an animal experiment.Materials and methods: For 76 guinea pigs, topical and systemic delivery methods, four pump types with different infusion rates, delivery durations, and total steroid amounts were used. Threshold changes of 8, 16, and 32 kHz after dummy electrode insertion were evaluated at 1 and 4 weeks and compared among delivery method and pump types. Inflammatory response in the cochlea was histologically compared.Results: For topical delivery groups, long-term release showed advantages in preserving hearing. Systemic delivery groups showed smaller threshold shifts than control group in all frequencies (p > .05). In short-term low dose application, compared to topical delivery, systemic delivery showed advantage in hearing preservation at both time point. However, others fail to show significant difference between two methods. Histologically, inflammatory response in the scala tympani at the basal turn was less in systemic delivery, especially in high dose and long-term.Conclusion and significance: The difference of hearing preservation was not obvious between two delivery methods. Higher dose and longer duration might have advantages in hearing preservation.

[New progress of IGF-1 and allosteroid injection in the treatment of sudden deafness complicated with type 2 diabetes]

Glucocorticoids are a recognized treatment for sudden deafness, and there has always been a contradiction between the control of blood glucose levels and the use of glucocorticoids. The systemic use of hormones may lead to a series of adverse events, which are dose-dependent. High doses can induce an increase in blood sugar, especially for patients with type 2 diabetes, which can aggravate their condition or cause complications. The systemic application of glucocorticoids has been largely replaced by local glucocorticoids treatment. Topical insulin-like growth factor （IGF-1） is used without increasing blood sugar, thus avoiding the possible complications. The author intends to compare the local IGF-1 treatment and local glucocorticoid treatment to systemic therapy. The efficacy of local IGF-1 therapy in treating corticosteroid-refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss combined with type 2 diabetes is reviewed.

Comparison of the Effects of Intratympanic Steroid Injection at Different Intervals in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Systemic steroid therapy (SST) and intratympanic steroid injection (ISI) have been the treatment of choice for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). We studied the effect of ISI administered at different intervals on hearing outcomes in patients with SSNHL.

Subjects and METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 427 patients diagnosed with SSNHL at Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, of whom 51 patients with SSNHL who received SST and four ISIs were included in this study. Patients were treated with four ISIs either every day for 4 days (group 1) or at intervals (mean duration of interval: 2.21 days) (group 2). Hearing outcomes were evaluated using the pure-tone test before the injection and 14 days, 1 month, and 3 months after the final injection. Recovery rates were classified based on Siegel's criteria.

RESULTS

The amount of improvement was 27.67 dB (±20.45) in group 1 and 32.79 dB (±21.42) in group 2. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups (p= 0.714). The recovery rates based on Siegel's criteria were 18/27 (66.7%) and 16/24 (66.7%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively, with no significant difference (p=1.000). Considering only complete recoveries in hearing recovery, the recovery rates were 15/27 (55.6%) and 14/24 (58.3%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively, with no significant difference (p=0.842).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in hearing outcomes or recovery rates after ISI administration every day or at intervals of 2-3 days.

Advances and Challenges in Pharmaceutical Therapies to Prevent and Repair Cochlear Injuries From Noise

Noise induces a broad spectrum of pathological injuries to the cochlea, reflecting both mechanical damage to the delicate architecture of the structures of the organ of Corti and metabolic damage within the organ of Corti and lateral wall tissues. Unlike ototoxic medications, the blood-labyrinth barrier does not offer protection against noise injury. The blood-labyrinth barrier is a target of noise injury, and can be weakened as part of the metabolic pathologies in the cochlea. However, it also offers a potential for therapeutic intervention with oto-protective compounds. Because the blood-labyrinth barrier is weakened by noise, penetration of blood-borne oto-protective compounds could be higher. However, systemic dosing for cochlear protection from noise offers other significant challenges. An alternative option to systemic dosing is local administration to the cochlea through the round window membrane using a variety of drug delivery techniques. The review will discuss noise-induced cochlear pathology, including alterations to the blood-labyrinth barrier, and then transition into discussing approaches for delivery of oto-protective compounds to reduce cochlear injury from noise.

Intratympanically Delivered Steroids Impact Thousands More Inner Ear Genes Than Systemic Delivery

Objectives:

Glucocorticoids are given for sensorineural hearing loss, but little is known of their molecular impact on the inner ear. Furthermore, in spite of claims of improved hearing recovery with intratympanic delivery of steroids, no studies have actually documented the inner ear molecular functions that are enhanced with this delivery method.

Methods:

To assess steroid-driven processes in the inner ear, gene chip analyses were conducted on mice treated systemically with the glucocorticoids prednisolone or dexamethasone or the mineralocorticoid aldosterone. Other mice were given the same steroids intratympanically. Inner ears were harvested at 6 hours and processed on the Affymetrix 430 2.0 Gene Chip for expression of its 34 000 genes. Results were statistically analyzed for up or down expression of each gene against control (untreated) mice.

Results:

Analyses showed approximately 17 500 genes are normally expressed in the inner ear and steroids alter expression of 55% to 82% of these. Dexamethasone changed expression of 9424 (53.9%) inner ear genes following systemic injection but 14 899 ear genes (85%) if given intratympanically. A similar pattern was seen with prednisolone, as 7560 genes were impacted by oral delivery and 11 164 genes (63.8%) when given intratympanically. The mineralocorticoid aldosterone changed expression of only 268 inner ear genes if given orally, but this increased to 10 124 genes (57.9%) if injected intratympanically. Furthermore, the glucocorticoids given actually impacted more inner ear genes via the mineralocorticoid receptor than the glucocorticoid receptor.

Conclusions:

Thousands of inner ear genes were affected by steroids, and this number increased significantly if steroids were delivered intratympanically. Also, the impact of glucocorticoids on inner ear mineralocorticoid functions is more substantial than previously known. Thus, the application of therapeutic steroids for hearing loss needs to be reassessed in light of their more comprehensive impact on inner ear genes. Furthermore, simply ascribing the efficacy of steroids to immunosuppression no longer appears to be warranted.

A comparison of systemic and local dexamethasone administration: From perilymph/cochlea concentration to cochlear distribution

Different types of inner ear diseases can damage different cochlear subsites by different mechanisms. Steroids administered by different methods are commonly used for treating inner ear diseases. There is reason to believe that dexamethasone (Dex) may reach cochlear subsite targets via different pathways after administration by different methods: Intratympanic (IT), postaural (PA), and intraperitoneal (IP). The purpose of this study was to explore the cochlear concentration and distribution of Dex after administration by different methods. High-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and immunofluorescence technology were employed to measure and compare the Dex concentration in the perilymph and cochlear tissue and the cochlear distribution of Dex. IT administration resulted in higher Dex concentrations in the perilymph and cochlear tissues than those with the other administration methods. Intratympanic and postaural administration could result in higher Dex concentrations in the organ of Corti than systemic administration, but systemic administration could result in higher Dex concentrations in the stria vascularis than the other administration methods. A decreasing basal-apical gradient of Dex uptake was present in the cochlea after IT but not IP or PA administration. These results indicate that different administration methods result in different Dex distributions, which can be attributed to features of the cochlear vascular system and intracochlear diffusion. Our results provide clinicians with an experimental basis for the use of different steroid injection routes to optimize the effects on inner ear diseases with different target organs.

Update on consensus on diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is a sudden, unexplained unilateral hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES

To update the Spanish Consensus on the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of ISSNHL.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to March 2018, on MESH terms «(acute or sudden) hearing loss or deafness», a third update was performed, including 1508 relevant papers.

RESULTS

Regarding diagnosis, 11ISSNHL is clinically suspected, the following diagnostic tests are mandatory: otoscopy, acumetry, tonal audiometry, speech audiometry, and tympanometry, to discount conductive causes. After clinical diagnosis has been established, and before treatment is started, a full analysis should be performed. An MRI should then be requested, ideally performed during the first 15 days after diagnosis, to discount specific causes and to help to understand the physiopathological mechanisms in each case. Although treatment is very controversial, due to its effect on quality of life after ISSNHL and the few rare adverse effects associated with short-term steroid treatment, this consensus recommends that all patients should be treated with steroids, orally and/or intratympanically, depending on each patient. In the event of failure of systemic steroids, intratympanic rescue is also recommended. Follow-up should be at day 7, and after 12 months.

CONCLUSION

By consensus, results after treatment should be reported as absolute decibels recovered in pure tonal audiometry and as improvement in speech audiometry.

Otic drug delivery systems: formulation principles and recent developments

Disorders of the ear severely impact the quality of life of millions of people, but the treatment of these disorders is an ongoing, but often overlooked challenge particularly in terms of formulation design and product development. The prevalence of ear disorders has spurred significant efforts to develop new therapeutic agents, but perhaps less innovation has been applied to new drug delivery systems to improve the efficacy of ear disease treatments. This review provides a brief overview of physiology, major diseases, and current therapies used via the otic route of administration. The primary focuses are on the various administration routes and their formulation principles. The article also presents recent advances in otic drug deliveries as well as potential limitations. Otic drug delivery technology will likely evolve in the next decade and more efficient or specific treatments for ear disease will arise from the development of less invasive drug delivery methods, safe and highly controlled drug delivery systems, and biotechnology targeting therapies.

Middle Ear Histopathology Following Magnetic Delivery to the Cochlea of Prednisolone-loaded Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Rats

Delivery of therapy to the cochlea is a challenge and limits the efficacy of therapies meant to treat hearing loss, reverse tinnitus, and protect hearing from chemotherapy regimens. Magnetic injection is a technique that uses magnetic fields to inject nanoparticles from the middle ear into the cochlea, where they can then elute therapy to treat hearing disorders. To evaluate the safety of this treatment in the middle ear, 30 rats were subdivided into 6 groups and treated by single or multiple intratympanic injections of saline, prednisolone, nanoparticles, or nanoparticles loaded with prednisolone. A specially designed magnet array was used to magnetically inject the particles from the middle ear to the cochlea. Treatment began at study day 0, and animals were euthanized on study day 2, 30, or 90. Temporal bones were collected and prepared for histopathological examination. Intratympanic administration of magnetic nanoparticles and/or prednisolone resulted in minimal to mild inflammatory changes in all treated groups. The incidence and severity of the inflammatory changes observed appeared slightly increased in animals administered nanoparticles, with or without prednisolone, when compared to animals administered prednisolone alone. At study day 90, there was partial reversibility of the findings noted at study day 2 and 30. Repeat administration did not appear to cause greater inflammatory changes.

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes Following Either Prefrontal Cortical-only or Dual-site Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Tinnitus Patients: A Double-blind Randomized Study

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated treatment outcomes following single-site repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and dual-site rTMS in the auditory cortex (AC) and DLPFC (AC + FC).

STUDY DESIGN AND PATIENTS

This prospective randomized double-blind trial initially included 19 patients with chronic tinnitus and 17 of these patients received rTMS on the left AC and left DLPFC or only the left DLPFC. The subjects were randomly allocated to either the dual-site rTMS (AC + FC) protocol (Group 1, n = 9) or the singlesite rTMS (DLPFC) protocol (Group 2, n = 8). Group 1 received daily treatments with 2,000 pulses applied to the AC and 1,000 pulses applied to the DLPFC for 4 days (total of 12,000 pulses) and Group 2 received daily treatments with 3,000 pulses applied the DLPFC for 4 days (total of 12,000 pulses).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The severity of tinnitus was assessed before rTMS treatment using the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and the self-rated Visual Analog Scale. These measures were used to determine the awareness, loudness, annoyance, and effects of tinnitus on daily life at 1, 2, 4, and 12 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

The improvement in THI score was significantly better in Group 1 than in Group 2, even after controlling for the between-group differences in pretreatment THI score. In terms of psychological factors, Group 1 exhibited significant improvements in scores on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for both state anxiety (STAI-X1) and trait anxiety (STAI-X2) at 12 weeks posttreatment and scores on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at 4 weeks posttreatment. Group 2 showed an improvement in only the STAI-X2 score at 12 weeks posttreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The rTMS protocol effectively suppressed tinnitus in the dual-site rTMS (AC+FC) group but not in the single-site rTMS (DLPFC) group. Although recent evidence has shown that non-auditory cortices in the tinnitus network play an important role in the generation of tinnitus, our findings indicate that rTMS on non-auditory cortical sites alone may not be sufficient for treatment. Thus, dual-site rTMS in the AC and DLPFC may be preferable for controlling this condition.