A Concordance Between Clinical and Pathological Tumor Staging of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Institutional Study

BACKGROUND

Among oral diseases, oral cancer is the primary cause of death and poses a serious health risk. Primary tumor (T) - regional lymph node (N) - distant metastasis (M) comprising (TNM) staging is crucial for planning treatment strategies for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

AIM

This study evaluated the predictive accuracy of clinical TNM staging of OSCC to histopathological staging (pTNM) in an institutional setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four consecutive histologically confirmed, surgically treated OSCC cases were evaluated for TNM staging. The study compared the clinical staging at the time of surgery with the pathological staging obtained from excisional biopsy reports. Microsoft Excel (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) was used for the data compilation and descriptive analysis. The chi-square test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey's Honest Significant Difference (HSD) posthoc test were used to compare the data for statistical significance with p value <0.05 using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Version 23.0, Armonk, NY).

RESULTS

The alveolar mucosa (n=22, 40.74%) was the most frequently occurring site, followed by the tongue (n=17, 31.48%). Out of the 54 included cases, based on clinical tumor size, there were T1 (n=6), T2 (n=13), T3 (n=13), T4a (n=16) and T4b (n=6). T2 tumors were usually upstaged (n=7) while T4a (n=8) tumors were most often downstaged. T4a (n=8) had the best concordance between clinical and histopathological staging, followed by T2, T3, and T1. In nodal status, N1 showed the most variation. The chi-squared test showed statistical significance for tumor size comparison (p <0.001) and nodal status comparison (p=0.002). ANOVA test did not show any statistical significance. Tukey's HSD posthoc test showed statistical significance (p=0.034) for N0 and N1 status. The highest concordance was shown by N0 and N1 followed by N2b.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative radiological and clinical assessments are essential for deciding on a patient's course of treatment. However, not all patients may require radiographs to determine tumor size or nodal status assessment. Accurate diagnosis is vital for the treatment planning of OSCC.

Unplanned Return to Hospital After Same Day Oral Cavity Resection: A Dual Institution Study

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective: describe rates of 30-days unplanned readmission following outpatient resection of oral cavity cancer. Secondary objective: evaluate for patient and treatment factors associated with readmission.

METHODS

Retrospective, dual-institution cohort study of 2 tertiary care referral centers involving adult patients undergoing resection of oral cavity cancer with plans for same-day discharge. Consecutive sample of 77 patients included. Primary outcome was unplanned readmission to emergency room or inpatient stay in the 30 days following surgery. Comparison testing was used between return and non-return groups.

RESULTS

Among 77 patients treated with outpatient surgery for oral cavity cancer, 19 (25%) returned to the hospital within 30 days. Among the reasons for return, 16 (80%) were directly related to surgery, and 4 (20%) were related to perioperative medical complications not directly related to a surgical site. Among the 25 patients also undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy with their oral cavity resection, none returned to the hospital for neck-related complications. While most patients could be safely observed and discharged after return to the hospital, 8 patients (10%) required inpatient readmission. No significant differences between return and non-return groups were identified, although there was a trend toward shorter driving distance from hospital for the return group (47.6 miles vs. 69.5 miles, P = 0.097).

CONCLUSION

Unplanned return to the hospital following outpatient oral cavity resection is prevalent and primarily driven by postoperative primary resection site concerns. Among patients selected for same day discharge, no definite population at highest risk of unplanned return was identified.

Management of clinically node-negative early-stage oral cancer: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

The best treatments for the clinically node-negative (cN0) neck in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients are a subject of ongoing debate and there is no consensus. A network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was conducted to determine the most effective treatment and to rank treatments based on their effectiveness. A systematic search was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to retrieve RCTs that compared therapeutic neck dissection (TND), sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and elective neck dissection (END). The outcomes analysed were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and nodal recurrence. Hazard ratios and risk ratios were calculated by direct meta-analysis and NMA. Ten RCTs with a total of 1858 patients were eligible for inclusion. Direct meta-analysis showed END to be superior to TND and comparable to SLNB. The NMA revealed no statistically significant difference between END and SLNB (very low quality evidence) regarding OS, DSS, DFS, and nodal recurrence. However, END was found to significantly improve OS and DFS, and reduce nodal recurrence when compared to TND (moderate quality evidence). END ranked as probably the top treatment option for maximizing OS and DSS, and reducing nodal recurrence in early-stage OSCC, followed by SLNB and TND. There was very low quality evidence supporting SLNB as non-inferior to END for patients with early-stage OSCC. This NMA yielded favourable results for the use of END (with moderate quality evidence) in early-stage OSCC patients, although excellent results have also been obtained with SLNB. However, data in the literature for SLNB are scarce, as this technique has not yet been formalized in many countries. There is a need to further explore SLNB for early-stage OSCC patients, as well as its value in detecting occult lymph node metastases on the contralateral side. More studies comparing morbidity, quality of life, and costs between the different management strategies for the clinically negative neck in early-stage OSCC patients are needed.

Summary of Japanese clinical practice guidelines for head and neck cancer - 2022 update edited by the Japan society for head and neck cancer

The aim of the "Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer - 2022 Update" is to review the latest evidence regarding head and neck cancer and to present the current standard approaches for diagnosis and treatment. These evidence-based recommendations were created with the consensus of the Guideline Committee, which is composed of otorhinolaryngologists and head and neck surgeons, together with radiologists, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, plastic surgeons, dentists, palliative care physicians, and rehabilitation physicians. These guidelines were created by the Clinical Practice Guideline Committee of the Japan Society for Head and Neck Cancer based on the "Head and Neck Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2018 Edition," and the revised draft was compiled after evaluation by the Assessment Committee and public comments. The 'Clinical questions and recommendations' section consists of 13 categories, and 59 clinical questions are described in total. Here we describe 6 clinical questions specific to other sets of guidelines with recommendations and comments.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus elective neck dissection in management of the clinically negative (cN0) neck in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most prevalent type of head and neck cancer, and lymph node metastasis is a crucial prognostic factor that has a direct correlation with the survival rate. The standard procedure for managing clinically negative (cN0) neck in OSCC patients is elective neck dissection (END), but it can lead to various complications that affect the patient's quality of life. Therefore, medical professionals are exploring the use of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) to manage cN0 neck in OSCC patients. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients undergoing SLNB and END in the surgical management of early cN0 neck in OSCC patients. To conduct this study, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was used to report the systematic reviews. The study included all comparative clinical studies, including randomized clinical trials (RCTs), clinical perspective studies, and retrospective studies that compared END to SLNB for early cN0 neck in OSCC patients. The hazard ratio (HR) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using comprehensive meta-analysis. The primary outcome variables were OS, DFS, and disease-specific survival (DSS). The secondary outcome variable was the nodal recurrence rate without local or distant metastasis. The GRADE system was used to assess the evidence's certainty. The meta-analysis included 12 clinical studies, comprising three RCTs and seven non-RCTs. The results showed no statistically significant difference between END and SLNB concerning OS (HR = 0.993, CI: 0.814 to 1.211, P = 0.947, low-quality evidence), DFS (HR = 0.705, CI: 0.408 to 1.29, P = 0.21, low-quality evidence), and nodal recurrence (RR = 1.028, CI: 0.969 to 1.090, P = 0.907, low-quality evidence). Additionally, SLNB was non-inferior to END regarding DSS (RR = 1.028, CI: 0.969 to 1.090, P = 0.907, low-quality evidence). In conclusion, this research affirms the safety and precision of SLNB as a means to stage cN0 OSCC patients, with outcomes that are comparable to END in terms of survival and nodal recurrence. Nevertheless, it's crucial to acknowledge that the quality of evidence in this study was relatively low. Therefore, additional RCTs comparing END to SLNB are warranted to validate these results and offer more robust guidance for managing cN0 OSCC patients.

Surgical Management of the Neck in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Oral cavity cancer remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with a poor prognosis once the disease has metastasized to cervical lymph nodes. The anatomy of lymphatic drainage in the neck gives us a roadmap to follow when assessing for metastasis, although the predictive factors are still not well understood. The mainstay of treatment continues to be neck dissection. However, there is much debate on the management of the clinically negative neck. The necessity of elective neck dissection has been questioned in recent years, with other options such as sentinel lymph node biopsy gaining popularity. This review will explore the aspects of surgical management of the neck in oral cavity cancer and highlights the further research that needs to be done.

Prognostic study of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma with computed tomography lymphography

PURPOSE

Occult metastasis is a prognostic factor for early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) is a promising method to detect such metastases. The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic reliability of SLNB with computed tomography lymphography (CTL) for early-stage OSCC and to clarify patient outcomes after SLNB.

METHODS

The medical records of 42 patients with T1 or T2 cN0 OSCC who had undergone CTL the day before surgery were retrospectively collected and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

SLNs were identified on CTL in 41 of 42 OSCC patients (97.6 %). Micrometastases were detected in 10 of 41 cases (24.4 %) and 11 of 65 SLNs (16.9 %) by intraoperative pathological diagnosis. Three cases showed occult metastasis within a year after the primary operation. Specificity and negative predictive value were 76.9 % and 90.3 %, respectively. The cumulative 5-year regional recurrence-free rate was 89.7 % in 31 SLNB-negative patients. Five-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 86.9 % and 70.1 %, respectively, in the 41 cases with identified SLNs.

CONCLUSION

CTL offers acceptable results and appears likely to be effective in treating early-stage OSCC patients with low-invasive surgery. Further investigation is necessary to compare radioisotope-based methods.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Up-Front PET/CT and MRI for Detecting Cervical Lymph Node Metastases in T1-T2 Oral Cavity Cancer-A Prospective Cohort Study

The diagnostic accuracy of up-front 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for detecting cervical lymph node metastases in patients with T1-T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma is reported with large discrepancies across the literature. We investigated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy of up-front PET/CT for detecting cervical lymph node metastases in this patient group and compared the performance to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this prospective cohort study, 76 patients with T1-T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma underwent an up-front PET/CT and MRI at the Odense University Hospital from September 2013 to February 2016. Sentinel node biopsy and elective neck dissection were used for histopathological verification of the imaging modalities. Up-front PET/CT was significantly more sensitive than neck MRI (74% vs. 27%, p = 0.0001), but less specific (60% vs. 88%, p = 0.001). The accuracy of PET/CT and neck MRI was comparable (66% vs. 63%, p = 0.85), the PPV was slightly in favor of neck MRI (56% vs. 62%, p = 0.73), the NPV was slightly in favor of PET/CT (77% vs. 63%, p = 0.16). Neither PET/CT nor neck MRI should stand alone for N-staging T1-T2 oral cavity cancer.

Cost-Effectiveness of [99mTc]Tilmanocept Relative to [99mTc]Sulfur Colloid for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Stage Oral Cavity Cancer

BACKGROUND

Several studies have demonstrated varying rates of efficacy, reliability, and sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in identifying occult nodal disease for early stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) depending on the radionuclide agent utilized. No head-to-head comparison of cost or clinical outcomes of SLNB when utilizing [99mTc]tilmanocept versus [99mTc]sulfur colloid has been performed. The goal of this study was to develop a decision model to compare the cost-effectiveness of [99mTc]tilmanocept versus [99mTc]sulfur colloid in early stage OCSCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A decision model of disease and treatment as a function of SLNB was created. Patients with a negative SLNB entered a Markov model of the natural history of OCSCC parameterized with published data to simulate five states of health and iterated over a 30-year time horizon. Treatment costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for each health state were included. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was then estimated using $100,000 per additional QALY as the threshold for determining cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

The base case cost-effectiveness analysis suggested [99mTc]tilmanocept was more effective than [99mTc]sulfur colloid by 0.12 QALYs (7.06 versus 6.94 QALYs). [99mTc]Tilmanocept was more costly, with a lifetime cost of $84,961 in comparison with $84,264 for sulfur colloid, however, the overall base case ICER was $5859 per additional QALY, well under the threshold for cost-effectiveness. Multiple one-way sensitivity analyses were performed, and demonstrated the model was robust to alternative parameter values.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis showed that while [99mTc]tilmanocept is more costly upfront, these costs are worth the additional QALYs gained by the use of [99mTc]tilmanocept.

Current Treatment Strategies and Risk Stratification for Oral Carcinoma

Management of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) involves a multidisciplinary team approach. Surgery is ideally the primary treatment option for nonmetastatic OSCC, and less invasive curative surgical approaches are preferred in early-stage disease to minimize surgical-related morbidity. For patients at high risk of recurrence, adjuvant treatment using radiation therapy or chemoradiation is often used. Systemic therapy may also be used in the neoadjuvant setting (for advanced-stage disease with the intent of mandibular preservation) or in the palliative setting (for nonsalvageable locoregional recurrence and/or distant metastases). Patient involvement in treatment decision is the key for patient-driven management, particularly in clinical situation with poor prognosis, for example, early postoperative recurrence before planned adjuvant therapy.

Treating Head and Neck Cancer in the Age of Immunotherapy: A 2023 Update

Most patients diagnosed with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) will present with locally advanced disease, requiring multimodality therapy. While this approach has a curative intent, a significant subset of these patients will develop locoregional failure and/or distant metastases. The prognosis of these patients is poor, and therapeutic options other than palliative chemotherapy are urgently needed. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression is an important factor in the pathogenesis of HNSCC, and a decade ago, the EGFR targeting monoclonal antibody cetuximab was approved for the treatment of late-stage HNSCC in different settings. In 2016, the anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab were both approved for the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC with disease progression on or after platinum-containing chemotherapy, and in 2019, pembrolizumab was approved for first-line treatment (either as monotherapy in PD-L1 expressing tumors, or in combination with chemotherapy). Currently, trials are ongoing to include immune checkpoint inhibition in the (neo)adjuvant treatment of HNSCC as well as in novel combinations with other drugs in the recurrent/metastatic setting to improve response rates and survival and help overcome resistance mechanisms to immune checkpoint blockade. This article provides a comprehensive review of the management of head and neck cancers in the current era of immunotherapy.

Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy for oral squamous cell carcinoma: Current evidence and future challenges

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been used across oncological specialties for prognostication, staging, and identification of occult nodal metastasis. Recent studies demonstrated the potential clinical utility of SLNB in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). Elective neck dissection is the current standard of care in early management of OCSCC with depth of invasion greater than 2-4 mm; however, majority of patients ultimately do not have nodal disease on final pathology. SLNB is an alternative procedure widely adopted in early cancer management in many oncological subspecialities. Several considerations such as depth of invasion, nodal mapping, histopathology methods, operator variability, postoperative complications, and advancement in preoperative and intraoperative imaging technology can guide the appropriate application to SLNB in OCSCC. The aim of this review is to discuss the current evidence for SLNB in the treatment of early stage OCSCC, imaging technologies that support SLNB procedures, and studies that are currently underway.

Neck and Shoulder Morbidity in Patients with Oral Cancer and Clinically Negative Node Neck Status: A Comparison between the Elective Neck Dissection and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Strategies

The choice for the most optimal strategy for patients with a cT_1-2N₀ carcinoma of the oral cavity, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or elective neck dissection (END), is still open for debate in many head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment centers. One of the possible benefits of the less invasive SLNB could be reduced neck and shoulder morbidity. Recent studies have shown a benefit in favor of SLNB the first year after intervention, but the long-term consequences and differences in neck morbidity remain unclear. This cross-sectional study aimed to research differences in neck and shoulder morbidity and Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) in patients with a cT_1-2N₀ carcinoma of the oral cavity, treated with either END or SLNB. Neck and shoulder morbidity and HR-QOL were measured with patient-reported questionnaires (SDQ, SPADI, NDI, NDII, EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-HN35) and active range of motion (AROM) measurements. In total 18 patients with END and 20 patients with SLNB were included. We found no differences between END and SLNB for long-term neck morbidity, shoulder morbidity, and HR-QOL. The significant differences found in the rotation of the neck are small and not clinically relevant.

Surgical Extent for Oral Cancer: Emphasis on a Cut-Off Value for the Resection Margin Status: A Narrative Literature Review

The optimal cut-off point of the resection margin was recently debated in oral cancer. To evaluate the current evidence of the dynamic criteria of the resection margin, a review of the available literature was performed. Studies were sourced from PubMed and EMBASE by searching for the keywords "mouth neoplasm", "oral cancer", "oral cavity cancer", "oral squamous cell carcinoma", "tongue cancer", "margins of excision", "surgical margin" and "resection margin". We found approximately 998 articles on PubMed and 2227 articles on EMBASE. A total of 3225 articles was identified, and 2763 of those were left after removing the duplicates. By applying advanced filters about the relevance of the subjects, these were narrowed down to 111 articles. After the final exclusion, 42 full-text articles were reviewed. The universal cut-off criteria of 5 mm used for determining the resection margin status has been debated due to recent studies evaluating the impact of different margin criteria on patient prognosis. Of note, the degree of the microscopic extension from the gross tumor border correlates with tumor dimensions. Therefore, a relatively narrow safety margin can be justified in early-stage oral cancer without the additional risk of recurrence, while a wide safety margin might be required for advanced-stage oral cancer. This review suggests a surgical strategy to adjust the criteria for risk grouping and adjuvant treatments, according to individual tumor dimensions or characteristics. In the future, it might be possible to establish individual tumor-specific surgical margins and risk stratification during or after surgery. However, the results should be interpreted with caution because there is no strong evidence (e.g., prospective randomized controlled studies) yet to support the conclusions. Our study is meaningful in suggesting future research directions and discussions.

Sentinel node biopsy in node negative early oral cancers: Solution to the conundrum!

Ideal management of the node-negative neck in early oral cancers is a debated issue. Elective neck dissection (END) is recommended in these patients as it offers a survival benefit. However, about 50-70% of patients who do not harbor occult metastasis are overtreated with this approach. Surgery is associated with morbidity, predominantly shoulder dysfunction. Numerous attempts have been made to identify true node-negative patients through imaging and prediction models but none have high diagnostic accuracy to safely spare the neck dissection. The recent publications of 2 large randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and END have spurred interest in SNB. Both the trials reported SNB to be an oncologically safe procedure and spared unnecessary neck dissections. The functional outcomes of the trials showed that SNB limits the morbidity compared to END, which albeit evens out at the end of one-year post-surgery. Despite its benefits, SNB has failed to gain widespread acceptability due to various limitations including the need for infrastructure, equipment costs, staff, and multidisciplinary collaboration of nuclear medicine, surgical, and pathology fraternity. The labor-intensive pathology protocol with serial step sectioning and immunohistochemistry poses a challenge to the feasibility at a high-volume center. This perspective discusses these limitations and propose plausible solutions to the conundrum. To make it widely applicable and feasible across the globe efforts should be directed to understand biology better, find novel solutions, and implement the lessons learned over decades from other sites.

Identification of occult metastatic disease via lymphoscintigraphy-guided neck dissection in N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of lymphoscintigraphy-guided neck dissection (LSG-ND) in the treatment of N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients with N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who had either LSG-ND or neck dissection (ND) at our institution between 2008 and 2020.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients met criteria with N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma with no previous treatment or neck surgery (27 LSG-ND, 60 ND). Sentinel lymph nodes were identified on the contralateral side in 14.8% of patients with unilateral tumors in the LSG-ND group, with 22.2% of cases with unexpected lymphatic drainage outside ipsilateral levels I-III. No recurrences to date have occurred in the LSG-ND cohort, while 13.3% of patients with ND had regional recurrence (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

LSG-ND provides a greater ability to identify occult metastatic disease with a significant reduction in regional recurrence in N0 oral SCC.

Centralised pathology service for sentinel node biopsy in oral cavity cancer: The Southeast England Consortium experience

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is an increasingly recognised option for accurate staging and subsequent management of the clinically negative neck in early stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. However, the technique is currently underused due to several logistic constraints including increased burden on pathology services. Here, we describe the feasibility of an outsourced centralised pathology processing and reporting service for sentinel lymph node biopsies in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Southeast England Consortium comprises four surgical centres utilising a central pathology service. Consecutive cases between January 2016 and February 2020 were retrospectively evaluated for survival outcomes and laboratory turnaround times.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight per cent from a cohort of 139 patients had positive sentinel nodes. There was a trend towards greater overall, disease-free and disease-specific survival (OS, DFS and DSS, respectively) in sentinel node negative compared to sentinel node positive patients, but these differences were not statistically significant. The sensitivity, negative predictive value and false negative rate were 92.8%, 97.0% and 6.8%, respectively. The mean and mode laboratory TAT were 5 and 4 working days, respectively.

CONCLUSION

An outsourced centralised pathology service is a feasible option to widen the availability of sentinel node biopsy in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Critical Review of the Current Evidence on Sentinel Node Biopsy in Oral Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With contemporary surgery of the cN0 neck in early oral cancer becoming more selective, sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is gaining popularity as a possible alternate option to elective neck dissection (END). This review attempts to critically appraise the current evidence and highlight pertinent arguments for the use of SNB in early oral cancers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Based on the recent randomized trials, it is imperative to perform an END at the time of primary resection in cN0 oral cancers. The much criticized false negative rate of SNB can be argued to be equal to the regional failure rate after END for pN0 necks, possibly making a case for SNB due to the reduction in number of neck dissections. There still lies ambiguity on the technique, protocols, and benefit of SNB over END. The role of extended histopathological techniques and the implications of micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells for treatment intensification remain questionable. Currently, SNB is an intermediary between routine imaging and END that needs to evolve before it can become a practice changing alternative to END itself. More efforts are needed in standardizing the protocols for SNB.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus Elective Node Dissection in Stage cT1-2N0 Oral Cavity Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) and elective neck dissection (END) in the surgical management of cT1-2N0 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).

METHODS

English full-text articles were searched in PubMed and Embase on May 9, 2021. Articles had to compare SNB with END in cT1-T2N0 OCSCC patients; report hazard ratios (HRs), Kaplan-Meier curves, or P-values with total number of events for survival outcomes; be from a clinical trial, cohort, or case-control study. Two reviewers reviewed articles and a third settled disagreements. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool and revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials were used. The generic inverse variance method with a random-effect model was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Ten studies, five retrospective, three prospective, and two randomized controlled trials, were included (total number of patients [n] = 10,498, END n = 9102, SNB n = 1396). No significant differences were found in OS (HR = 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.31) or DFS (HR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.41-1.20). Heterogeneity was not detected in pooled OS analysis (P = .18; I²  = 30%), but was in pooled DFS analysis (P = .003; I²  = 66%).

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant differences in OS or DFS were observed between SNB and END in cT1-2N0 OCSCC, suggesting that SNB might be an alternative to END in the management of early-stage, clinically node-negative OCSCC. Laryngoscope, 2021.

Analysis of the Efficiency and Prognostic Value of the Sentinel Node Technique in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Seven Years

Background and objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyse the diagnostic and prognostic efficiency of the sentinel lymph node biopsy technique (SLNB). Materials and Methods: This is a prospective observational study performed by the Hospital Complex in Santiago de Compostela (CHUS) in Spain, between February 2013 and June 2020. The study included 60 patients, who had been diagnosed with OSCC in stage T1/T2N0M0. Results: 10 patients (16.7%) presented with SN+ (sentinel node positive). The majority (80%) only presented subcapsular affection, however one case also presented with extracapsular affection. Using the Kaplan–Meier curves, we determined that the average survival estimation for SN− patients was 74.0 months (CI95% 67.6–80.5) and it was 45.4 months (CI95% 10.9–24.0) for SN+ patients (p = 0.002). SN+ patients presented an OR = 11.000 (CI95% 2.393–50.589, p = 0.002) for cancer-related mortality. In terms of the diagnostic performance of the SN (sentinel node) test, a 55% sensitivity, a 100% specificity, 100% PPV and a 84% NPV were obtained. The analysis using ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves revealed an AUC = 0.671 (CI95% 0.492–0.850, p = 0.046). Conclusions: SLNB seems to be an adequate technique for the detection of hidden metastases.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus elective neck dissection in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity with a clinically N0 neck: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an emerging strategy for managing early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with a clinically N0 (cN0) neck. However, the role of SLNB in this scenario is debatable. Herein, relevant literature was systematically reviewed, and a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the potential dividends of SLNB compared to elective neck dissection (END) for these patients. The meta-analysis, including six prospective studies, showed comparable results of the two management strategies in terms of regional recurrence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-1.70), 5-year disease-free survival (RR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.11), and 5-year overall survival (RR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90-1.13). Fewer adverse events occurred in the SLNB arm than in the END arm (RR = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.70). Overall, SLNB results in as favorable an oncologic prognosis for patients with cN0 oral SCC as END, while significantly lessening side effects and unnecessary surgeries.

Application of supraomohyoid neck dissection via retroauricular hairline incision in patients with oral cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore the application of supraomohyoid neck dissection via retroauricular hairline incision in patients with oral cancer, thereby providing a basis for the surgical treatment of patients with oral cancer in clinical practice.

METHODS

A total of 68 patients with oral cancer who met the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria were included in our hospital from August 2018 to June 2020. According to the random number table method, they were divided into the experimental group (34 cases), in which patients underwent supraomohyoid neck dissection via retroauricular hairline incision, and control group (34 cases), in which patients received neck dissection.

RESULTS

The operation time was significantly longer and the intraoperative bleeding was significantly less in the experimental group compared with those in the control group (both P < 0.05). No significant differences in postoperative drainage, number of detected lymph nodes and length of hospital stay were detected between the two groups. One month after surgery, the scores of pains, muscle strength, range of motion and daily activities were significantly higher in the experimental group than those in the control group (all P < 0.05). Three months after surgery, the scores of pains, muscle strength, range of motion and daily activities were higher compared with those at one month after surgery in both groups, and these scores in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group (all P < 0.05). In addition, the scores of shoulder function, language, deglutition, chew, work, entertainment, activity of daily living, facial features, pain and degree of satisfaction to the scars in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group one month after surgery (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Supraomohyoid neck dissection via retroauricular hairline incision can reduce the amount of intraoperative bleeding in patients with oral cancer, is beneficial to the recovery of shoulder joint function, improves the patient's quality of life and the degree of satisfaction to the scars, reduces the occurrence of related complications. It has relatively high safety and is worthy of clinical application and promotion.

Metastatic and sentinel lymph node mapping using intravenously delivered Panitumumab-IRDye800CW

Rationale: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a well-established minimally invasive staging procedure that maps the spread of tumour metastases from their primary site to the regional lymphatics. Currently, the procedure requires the local peri-tumoural injection of radiolabelled and/or optical agents, and is therefore operator dependent, disruptive to surgical workflow and restricted largely to a small subset of malignancies that can be readily accessed externally for local tracer injection. The present study set out to determine whether intravenous (IV) infusion of a tumor-targeted tracer could identify sentinel and metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) in order to overcome these limitations. Methods: We examined 27 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), 18 of whom were clinically node negative (cN0). Patients were infused intravenously with 50mg of Panitumumab-IRDye800CW prior to surgical resection of their primary tumour with neck dissection and/or SLNB. Lymphadenectomy specimens underwent fluorescence molecular imaging to evaluate tracer distribution to LNs. Results: A total of 960 LNs were analysed, of which 34 (3.5%) contained metastatic disease. Panitumumab-IRDye800CW preferentially localized to metastatic and sentinel LNs as evidenced by a higher fluorescent signal relative to other lymph nodes. The median MFI of metastatic LNs was significantly higher than the median MFI of benign LNs (0.06 versus 0.02, p < 0.05). Furthermore, selecting the highest five fluorescence intensity LNs from individual specimens resulted in 100% sensitivity, 85.8% specificity and 100% negative predictive value (NPV) for the detection of occult metastases and 100% accuracy for clinically staging the neck. In the cN+ cohort, assessment of the highest 5 fluorescence LNs per patient had 87.5% sensitivity, 93.2% specificity and 99.1% NPV for the detection of metastatic nodes. Conclusion: When intravenously infused, a tumour-targeted tracer localized to sentinel and metastatic lymph nodes. Further validation of an IV tumor-targeted tracer delivery approach for SLNB could dramatically change the practice of SLNB, allowing its application to other malignancies where the primary tumour is not accessible for local tracer injection.

Cortactin expression assessment improves patient selection for a watchful waiting strategy in pT1cN0-staged oral squamous cell carcinomas with a tumor infiltration depth below 4 mm

BACKGROUND

In this feasibility study we aimed to evaluate the value of previously reported molecular tumor biomarkers associated with lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) to optimize neck strategy selection criteria.

METHODS

The association between expression of cortactin, cyclin D1, FADD, RAB25, and S100A9 and sentinel lymph node status was evaluated in a series of 87 (cT1-2N0) patients with OSCC treated with primary resection and SLNB procedure.

RESULTS

Tumor infiltration depth and tumor pattern of invasion were independent prognostic markers for SLN status, while none of the tumor makers showed a better prognostic value to replace SLNB as neck staging technique in the total cohort. However, in the subgroup of patients with pT1N0 OSCC, cortactin expression (OR 16.0, 95%CI 2.0-127.9) was associated with SLN classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Expression of cortactin is a promising immunohistochemical tumor marker to identify patients at low risk that may not benefit from SLNB or END.

High-risk early-stage oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma, when free margins are not enough: Critical review

Oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) is a quite peculiar disease from an anatomical and biological standpoint. An increasing amount of literature highlights the existence of a small subset of T1-T2N0 OTSCC, properly resected on a margin-dependent basis, which conversely proved higher than expected rates of loco-regional/distant failure and disease-specific mortality. These specific high-risk tumors might not have a margin-dependent disease and could possibly benefit from a more aggressive upfront loco-regional treatment, especially addressing the so-called T-N tract. Widespread adoption of a histopathological risk model would allow early recognition of these high-risk diseases and, consequently, intensification of the traditional treatment strategies in that specific niche. We reviewed the available knowledge trying to shed light on the potential determinants of the dismal prognosis of these high-risk OTSCC, with special reference to the role of overlooked T-N tract involvement and possible alternatives in terms of elective neck management and risk stratification.

Contralateral Regional Recurrence in Lateralized or Paramedian Early-Stage Oral Cancer Undergoing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy-Comparison to a Historic Elective Neck Dissection Cohort

Introduction: Nowadays, two strategies are available for the management of the clinically negative neck in early-stage (cT1-2N0) oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC): elective neck dissection (END) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). SLNB stages both the ipsilateral and the contralateral neck in early-stage OSCC patients, whereas the contralateral neck is generally not addressed by END in early-stage OSCC not involving the midline. This study compares both incidence and hazard of contralateral regional recurrences (CRR) in those patients who underwent END or SLNB.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study, including 816 lateralized or paramedian early-stage OSCC patients, staged by either unilateral or bilateral END (n = 365) or SLNB (n = 451).

Results: The overall rate of occult contralateral nodal metastasis was 3.7% (30/816); the incidence of CRR was 2.5% (20/816). Patients who underwent END developed CRR during follow-up more often than those who underwent SLNB (3.8 vs. 1.3%; p = 0.018). Moreover, END patients had a higher hazard for developing CRR than SLNB patients (HR = 2.585; p = 0.030). In addition, tumor depth of invasion was predictive for developing CRR (HR = 1.922; p = 0.009). Five-year disease-specific survival in patients with CRR was poor (42%) compared to patients in whom occult contralateral nodal metastases were detected by SLNB or bilateral END (88%), although not statistically different (p = 0.066).

Conclusion: Our data suggest that SLNB allows for better control of the contralateral clinically negative neck in patients with lateralized or paramedian early-stage OSCC, compared to END as performed in a clinical setting. The prognosis of those in whom occult contralateral nodal metastases are detected at an earlier stage may be favorable compared to those who eventually develop CRR, which highlights the importance of adequate staging of the contralateral clinically negative neck.

Neck Dissections Based on Sentinel Lymph Node Navigation Versus Elective Neck Dissections in Early Oral Cancers: A Randomized, Multicenter, and Noninferiority Trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare patients with early oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) (tumor category [T] 1-2, node-negative, and no distant metastasis) treated with traditional elective neck dissection (ND) with those managed by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using survival and neck function and complications as end points.

METHODS

Sixteen institutions in Japan participated in the study (trial registration number: UMIN000006510). Patients of age ≥ 18 years with histologically confirmed, previously untreated OCSCC (Union for International Cancer Control TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors 7th edition T1-2, node-negative no distant metastasis), with ≥ 4 mm (T1) depth of invasion, were randomly assigned to undergo standard selective ND (ND group; n = 137) or SLNB-navigated ND (SLNB group; n = 134). The primary end point was the 3-year overall survival rate, with a 12% noninferiority margin; secondary end points included postoperative neck functionality and complications and 3-year disease-free survival. Sentinel lymph nodes underwent intraoperative multislice frozen section analyses for the diagnosis. Patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes underwent either one-stage or second-look ND.

RESULTS

Pathologic metastasis-positive nodes were observed in 24.8% (34 of 137) and 33.6% (46 of 134) of patients in the ND and SLNB groups, respectively (P = .190). The 3-year overall survival in the SLNB group (87.9%; lower limit of one-sided 95% CI, 82.4) was noninferior to that in the ND group (86.6%; lower limit 95% CI, 80.9; P for noninferiority < .001). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 78.7% (lower limit 95% CI, 72.1) and 81.3% (75.0) in the SLNB and ND groups, respectively (P for noninferiority < .001). The scores of neck functionality in the SLNB group were significantly better than those in the ND group.

CONCLUSION

SLNB-navigated ND may replace elective ND without a survival disadvantage and reduce postoperative neck disability in patients with early-stage OCSCC.

Circulating hybrid cells predict presence of occult nodal metastases in oral cavity carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Levels of circulating hybrid cells (CHCs), a newly identified circulating tumor cell (CTC), correlate with disease stage and progression in cancer. We investigated their utility to risk-stratify patients with clinically N0 (cN0) oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), and to identify patients with occult cervical lymph node metastases (pN+).

METHODS

We analyzed peripheral blood samples for CHCs with co-expression of cytokeratin (tumor) and CD45 (leukocyte) from 22 patients with cN0 OCSCC using immunofluorescence microscopy, then correlated levels with pathologic lymph node status.

RESULTS

CHC levels exceeded CTCs and correlated with the presence of both clinically overt (p = 0.002) and occult nodal metastases (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

For evaluated cN0 OCSCC patients, those with cN0 → pN+ status harbored elevated CHC levels compared to patients without occult disease. Our findings highlight a promising blood-based biologic assay with potential utility to determine the necessity of surgical neck dissection for staging and treatment.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus elective neck dissection: long-term oncologic outcomes in clinically node-negative tongue cancer

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus elective neck dissection (END) in clinically node-negative (cN0) tongue cancer.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with cN0 tongue cancer from a single institution, including 91 patients in the SLNB group and 120 patients in the END group.

Results

The overall recurrence rate showed no significant difference between the two groups. The regional control rate was also comparable between the two groups (P=0.490). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was slightly better in the SLNB group than in the END group (P=0.427). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 89.9% in the SLNB group versus 91.9% in the END group (P=0.737). In a propensity-matched subgroup analysis, the type of neck management did not affect RFS or OS.

Conclusion

SLNB showed non-inferior oncologic outcomes compared to END in patients with cN0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

The Indications for Elective Neck Dissection in T1N0M0 Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

The management of the clinically node-negative neck in T1 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate tumor characteristics of surgically managed patients with T1N0 oral cavity SCC and determine the possible benefits of elective neck dissection (END).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted assessing outcomes for patients with stage I oral SCC at Waikato Hospital, New Zealand, between 2008 and 2018. Clinical staging was based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer Cancer Staging Manual, 8^th Edition. Patients with T1N0 SCC either had an END or had the neck observed. These data were used to determine the rate of occult nodal disease, recurrence rate, and survival. Data collected included patient demographics, location, tumor characteristics including differentiation, depth of invasion (DOI), perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion, closest histologic margin, management of the neck, the number of pathologic lymph nodes, adjuvant treatment, recurrence, and survival.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients were included in the study (40 male, 30 female; age range 30 to 91; mean age 65 years). Twenty-seven (38.6%) patients underwent END, whereas 43 patients (61.4%) were observed. Occult nodal metastases were diagnosed in 6 of 27 (22.2%) patients who underwent END. Regional relapse occurred in 7 of 43 (16.3%) patients who were observed. Risk factors for nodal disease included increasing DOI ≥ 3 mm (P = .049), poor tumor differentiation (P = .003), and presence of PNI (P = .002). Negative prognostic factors for overall survival included male gender (P = .02, hr = 3.55, CI for HR (1.18, 10.65)), presence of PNI (P = .001, hr = 4.52, CI for HR (1.77, 11.57)), and locoregional recurrence (P < .005, hr = 6.55, CI for HR (2.69, 15.98)). Six of the 7 tumors that relapsed in the neck after observation had a primary tumor DOI < 3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

There is little data published for management outcomes of the node-negative neck in stage I oral squamous cell carcinoma. Given salvage neck dissection carries a poorer prognosis, END should be recommended for all T1N0 oral SCC with DOI ≥ 3 mm. In cases of DOI < 3 mm undergoing primary ablation only, a staging neck dissection as a second procedure should be considered in the presence of poor tumor differentiation or PNI on final histology.

Diagnostic yield of sentinel lymph node biopsy in oral squamous cell carcinoma T1/T2-N0: systematic review and meta-analysis

The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in T1/T2-N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A systematic review of the literature on SLNB until March 2019 was conducted. The review was organized according to the PRISMA protocol, considering the following PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) question: What is the sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy in OSCC? 'P' was patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma T1/2-N0; 'I' was SLNB; 'C' was neck treated with elective neck dissection and haematoxylin-eosin histopathology; 'O' was sensitivity and specificity. A meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed on the selected studies. The sensitivity of SLNB was up to 88% (95% confidence interval (CI) 72-96%) and specificity was up to 99% (95% CI 96-100%). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1.00). In the four studies where immunohistochemistry was performed, both the sensitivity and specificity were higher than in the studies without immunohistochemistry: 93% (95% CI 88-97%) and 98% (95% CI 96-100%), respectively. In conclusion, SLNB is an effective technique for treating patients with some types of stage T1/2-N0 OSCC. Some parameters such as immunohistochemistry could determine the level of diagnostic accuracy.

What is the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of oral cancer in 2020?

Approximately 70–80% of patients with cT1-2N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) ultimately prove to have no cancer in the cervical lymphatics on final pathology after selective neck dissection. As a result, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been adopted during the last decade as a diagnostic staging method to intelligently identify patients who would benefit from formal selective lymphadenectomy or neck irradiation. While not yet universally accepted, SLNB is now incorporated in many national guidelines. SLNB offers a less invasive alternative to elective neck dissection (END), and has some advantages and disadvantages. SLNB can assess the individual drainage pattern and, with step serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry (IHC), can enable the accurate detection of micrometastases and isolated tumor cells (ITCs). Staging of the neck is improved relative to END with routine histopathological examination. The improvements in staging are particularly notable for the contralateral neck and the pretreated neck. However, for floor of mouth (FOM) tumors, occult metastases are frequently missed by SLNB due to the proximity of activity from the primary site to the lymphatics (the shine through phenomenon). For FOM cancers, it is advised to perform either elective neck dissection or superselective neck dissection of the preglandular triangle of level I. New tracers and techniques under development may improve the diagnostic accuracy of SLNB for early-stage OSCC, particularly for FOM tumors. Treatment of the neck (either neck dissection or radiotherapy), although limited to levels I–IV, remains mandatory for any positive category of metastasis (macrometastasis, micrometastasis, or ITCs). Recently, the updated EANM practical guidelines for SLN localization in OSCC and the surgical consensus guidelines on SLNB in patients with OSCC were published. In this review, the current evidence and results of SLNB in early OSCC are presented.

The impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy on the quality of life in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a proven method for staging the neck in patients with early oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma because it results in less comorbidity than the traditional method of selective neck dissection, with the same oncological results. However, the real effect of that method on the quality of life of such patients remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to evaluate the quality of life of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma T1/T2N0 submitted to sentinel lymph node biopsy compared to those that received selective neck dissection.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study including 24 patients, after a 36 month follow-up, 15 of them submitted to the sentinel lymph node biopsy and 9 to selective neck dissection. All patients answered the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire.

RESULTS

The evaluation of the questionnaires showed a late worsening of the domains appearance (p=0.035) and chewing (p=0.041), as well as a decrease of about 10% of general quality of life (p=0.025) in patients undergoing selective neck dissection ​​in comparison to those undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy.

CONCLUSION

Patients with early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy presented better late results of general quality of life, mainly regarding appearance and chewing, when compared to patients submitted to selective neck dissection.

New Developments in Imaging for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a diagnostic staging procedure that aims to identify the first draining lymph node(s) from the primary tumor, the sentinel lymph nodes (SLN), as their histopathological status reflects the histopathological status of the rest of the nodal basin. The routine SLNB procedure consists of peritumoral injections with a technetium-99m [^99mTc]-labelled radiotracer followed by lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT-CT imaging. Based on these imaging results, the identified SLNs are marked for surgical extirpation and are subjected to histopathological assessment. The routine SLNB procedure has proven to reliably stage the clinically negative neck in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, an infamous limitation arises in situations where SLNs are located in close vicinity of the tracer injection site. In these cases, the hotspot of the injection site can hide adjacent SLNs and hamper the discrimination between tracer injection site and SLNs (shine-through phenomenon). Therefore, technical developments are needed to bring the diagnostic accuracy of SLNB for early-stage OSCC to a higher level. This review evaluates novel SLNB imaging techniques for early-stage OSCC: MR lymphography, CT lymphography, PET lymphoscintigraphy and contrast-enhanced lymphosonography. Furthermore, their reported diagnostic accuracy is described and their relative merits, disadvantages and potential applications are outlined.

Equivalence Randomized Trial to Compare Treatment on the Basis of Sentinel Node Biopsy Versus Neck Node Dissection in Operable T1-T2N0 Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer

PURPOSE

Sentinel node (SN) biopsy is accurate in operable oral and oropharyngeal cT1-T2N0 cancer (OC), but, to our knowledge, the oncologic equivalence of SN biopsy and neck lymph node dissection (ND; standard treatment) has never been evaluated.

METHODS

In this phase III multicenter trial, 307 patients with OC were randomly assigned to (1) the ND arm or (2) the SN arm (experimental arm: biopsy alone if negative, or followed by ND if positive, during primary tumor surgery). The primary outcome was neck node recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 2 years. Secondary outcomes were 5-year neck node RFS, 2- and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). Other outcomes were hospital stay length, neck and shoulder morbidity, and number of physiotherapy prescriptions during the 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Data on 279 patients (139 ND and 140 SN) could be analyzed. Neck node RFS was 89.6% (95% CI, 0.83% to 0.94%) at 2 years in the ND arm and 90.7% (95% CI, 0.84% to 0.95%) in the SN arm, confirming the equivalence with P < .01. The 5-year RFS and the 2- and 5-year DSS and OS were not significantly different between arms. The median hospital stay length was 8 days in the ND arm and 7 days in the SN arm (P < .01). The functional outcomes were significantly worse in the ND arm until 6 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the oncologic equivalence of the SN and ND approaches, with lower morbidity in the SN arm during the first 6 months after surgery, thus establishing SN as the standard of care in OC.

Challenges and outcomes in establishing a sentinel lymph node biopsy service for oral squamous cell carcinoma in a regional district specialist hospital

UK national guidelines in 2016 recommended that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) should be offered to patients with early oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We review the establishment of an OSCC SLNB service with specific consideration to resources, service implications and patient outcomes. A review of processes was performed to identify key stages in establishing the service, and subsequently a retrospective cohort study consisting of 46 consecutive patients with T1/T2 N0 OSCC was undertaken. The key stages identified were: coordinating a nuclear medicine pathway and reliable cost-appropriate pathology service, constructing a Trust business case, and gaining approval of a new interventional service policy. A median (range) of 3.3 (1-8) sentinel nodes (SLN) were removed, with 17 patients having a positive SLN. The negative predictive value of SLNB was 100%, with 12 having a SLN outside the field if elective neck dissection (END) was planned. There was a significantly increased risk of a positive SLN with increasing depth of invasion (DOI) (p=0.007) and increased diameter (p=0.036). We also identified a longer-than-ideal time to completion neck dissection and inadequate ultrasound follow up of negative SLNB patients. Establishment of a service requires careful planning. Our results were in keeping with those reported in the literature, and showed that SLNB for OSCC has a high negative predictive value and can identify at-risk SLN outside the traditional END levels, even in well-lateralised tumours. Our findings show that DOI and size of SLN were significantly associated with a positive SLN, and also identified areas requiring improvement.

Variability in Recommendations for Cervical Lymph Node Pathology for Staging of Canine Oral Neoplasia: A Survey Study

There is no clear guideline regarding the indication for routine lymph node extirpation and pathologic evaluation during staging of canine oral tumors, despite a relatively high reported nodal metastatic rate for select tumor types. It is particularly unclear if clinicians recommend removal of lymph nodes only when there is confirmation of metastasis, defined as the N+ neck, or if elective neck dissection (END) is routinely recommended to confirm the true pathologic metastatic status of lymph nodes in the clinical N0 neck (no evidence of metastasis on clinical staging with diagnostic imaging or cytology). When clinicians are recommending END as a staging tool to confirm nodal status, there is also ambiguity regarding the surgical extent for subsequent histopathologic evaluation. The objective of this cross-sectional survey study was to determine the current recommendations given by practicing specialists regarding lymph node removal for dogs with oral tumors. Overall, 87 responses were obtained from 49 private practices (56%) and 38 academic institutions (44%). Respondents identified as oncologists (44%, N = 38), soft tissue surgeons (40%, N = 35), and dentists (16%, N = 14). Regardless of tumor type and stage, extirpation and histopathology were most commonly recommended in the clinical N+ neck only. The recommendation to routinely perform END in the N0 neck was significantly associated with tumor type. Bilateral removal of the mandibular and retropharyngeal lymph nodes was recommended more often for oral malignant melanoma (OMM) than for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC; p ≤ 0.0039) or for oral fibrosarcoma (OFSA; p ≤ 0.0007). The likelihood of recommending END increased with increasing tumor size. Academic clinicians were significantly (p < 0.01) more likely to recommend END compared to private practitioners for canine T1-T3 OMM, T3 OSCC, T2 OFSA, and MCT. This study highlights the variability in recommendations for lymph node pathology for dogs with oral tumors. While tumor type and size influenced the decision to pursue END, it was not routinely recommended, even for tumor types with a known propensity for metastasis. Prospective studies are warranted to determine the potential diagnostic and therapeutic value of END in the N0 neck in veterinary patients such that a consensus approach can be made.

Head and neck robotic surgery combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy. Fascinating, but feasible?

Robotic approaches and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy are both strategies that evolved driven by the need to reduce impact of head and neck oncological surgery in terms of operative timing, morbidity, hospitalization time, and aesthetic results. A comprehensive review of the scientific literature was performed on PubMed, Embase, ResearchGate, Cochrane, and CENTRAL electronic databases with the aim to discuss the role that these two approaches can play together in the management of head and neck cancers (HNCs) of various sites. Dedicated publications on the combined robotics and SLN biopsy approaches resulted, up to now very limited, while their separated application in non-shared fields is gaining strength. However, the possibility to implement and combine technologies to minimize sequelae of head and neck surgery is an interesting and evolving topic.

Indications and outcomes of superselective neck dissection: A review and analysis of the literature

Superselective neck dissection, defined as dissection of two or less contiguous neck levels, has recently been introduced to reduce surgical morbidity of neck dissection while maintaining favorable oncologic outcomes. The purpose of this review is to report the results of superselective neck dissection when applied to specific settings: the management of regional disease after chemoradiation, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with clinical N0 necks, and high risk papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Elective Neck Dissection or Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Stage Oral Cavity Cancer Patients: The Dutch Experience

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been introduced as a diagnostic staging modality for detection of occult metastases in patients with early stage oral cancer. Comparisons regarding accuracy to the routinely used elective neck dissection (END) are lacking in literature. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study included 390 patients staged by END and 488 by SLNB. Results: The overall sensitivity (84% vs. 81%, p = 0.612) and negative predictive value (NPV) (93%, p = 1.000) were comparable between END and SLNB patients. The END cohort contained more pT2 tumours (51%) compared to the SLNB cohort (23%) (p < 0.001). No differences were found for sensitivity and NPV between SLNB and END divided by pT stage. In floor-of-mouth (FOM) tumours, SLNB had a lower sensitivity (63% vs. 92%, p = 0.006) and NPV (90% vs. 97%, p = 0.057) compared to END. Higher disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were found for pT1 SLNB patients compared to pT1 END patients (96% vs. 90%, p = 0.048). Conclusion: In the absence of randomized clinical trials, this study provides the highest available evidence that, in oral cancer, SLNB is as accurate as END in detecting occult lymph node metastases, except for floor-of-mouth tumours.

Sentinel lymph node biopsies in early stage oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective single-centre experience

The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse a consecutive series of patients with oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma who had had sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) at our hospital during 2008-2017. A total of 70 patients with clinically and radiologically confirmed primary oral (n=67) or oropharyngeal (n=3) carcinoma, with no signs of metastatic lymph nodes preoperatively (clinically N0) were included. Patients' clinical and personal data, characteristics of the tumours, sentinel lymph node (SLN) status and outcomes were recorded. Eight patients had invaded SLN. Two patients with clear sentinel lymph node biopsies had recurrences in the cervical lymph nodes with no new primary tumour as origin. The negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity for SLNB were 97% and 80%, respectively. The depth of invasion was an individual predictor for cervical lymph node metastasis (p=0.043). Single photo emission computed tomography (SPECT) detected fewer SLN in patients with invaded lymph nodes than in patients with clear lymph nodes (p=0.018). Our data support the use of SLNB as a minimally invasive method for staging the cervical lymph nodes among patients with cN0 oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma. Our results further confirm that greater depth of invasion is associated with cervical lymph node metastases.

Significance of PET-CT for Detecting Occult Lymph Node Metastasis and Affecting Prognosis in Early-Stage Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Objective: We aimed to clarify the significance of PET-CT for detecting occult lymph node metastasis and for affecting prognosis in early-stage tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods: Patients with surgically treated primary cT1-2N0 tongue SCC who agreed to undergo a preoperative PET-CT scan were prospectively enrolled. The primary study outcomes were occult neck lymph node metastasis and locoregional control (LRC). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the LRC rate, and then the factors that were significant in the Kaplan-Meier method were assessed in the Cox model to determine the independent factors. Results: A total of 135 patients were included, and the median maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max) of the primary tumor was 9.0. When analyzing the PET-CT results, 18 patients were recognized as having neck lymph node metastasis, and 12 patients were proven to have pathologic lymph nodes. A total of 117 patients did not have neck lymph node metastasis reported by PET-CT, and five patients were proven to have pathologic lymph nodes. The sensitivity and specificity of PET-CT for predicting occult metastasis were 70.6 and 94.9%, respectively. In patients with an SUV max ≤ 9.0, the 5-year LRC rate was 95%; in patients with an SUV max >9.0, the 5-year LRC rate was 85%, and the difference was significant. Further Cox model analyses confirmed the independence of the SUV max for predicting LRC. Conclusion: PET-CT has a high specificity for predicting occult lymph node metastasis, and an SUV max >9.0 is significantly associated with worse LRC in cT1-2N0 tongue SCC.

Elective neck dissection versus observation for early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the seventh most common cancer globally, and has been identified as a growing health concern. This study aims to evaluate the current literature comparing elective neck dissection to observation in the treatment of early-stage tongue SCC, focusing on nodal recurrence, overall survival, disease specific survival statistics from randomised controlled trials comparing the two interventions.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The odds ratio (OR) was used as a summary statistic.

RESULTS

From 8 studies, there was a total of 372 cases of recurrence, 98 (15.1%) in END group and 274 (41.5%) in the Observation group. There was a significantly lower rate of recurrence in the END group compared to observation (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.16-0.39, I² = 54%, P < 0.00001). END was associated with higher overall survival rates when compared with observation (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.40-2.73, I² = 14%, P < 0.0001). END was also associated with higher disease-specific survival compared with observation (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.21-2.93), I² = 47%, P = 0.005), with no significant heterogeneity noted.

CONCLUSIONS

END was associated with significantly lower recurrence rates and higher overall and disease-specific survival compared to a conservative observation approach in early-stage oral SCC with clinically N0 neck.