Scalp advancement for transgender women: Closing the gap

Objective Outcomes of Trichophytic Brow Lift and Hairline Advancement in Facial Feminization Surgery

Importance: The upper facial third is an important area to address in facial feminization surgery (FFS). Objective: This study seeks to quantify the changes in eyebrow, hairline, and forehead heights associated with brow lift and hairline advancement surgery in the transgender patient population. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cohort study performed at an academic medical center. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pre- and postoperative frontal view photographs underwent computer-aided photograph analysis. Brow position, hairline position, and forehead height were measured. Patient self-identified race, ethnicity, as well as other demographic factors were also collected. Results: Forty-six patients underwent FFS with brow lift and hairline advancement with photographs permitting measurement. Eyebrow analysis was performed in 33 patients. Hairline and forehead analyses were accomplished in 30 patients. The mean brow elevation was 4.6 mm across all locations. The forehead reduction achieved was 9.8-11.3 mm. Conclusion and Relevance: Trichophytic brow lifting with hairline advancement outcomes was able to be reliably quantified from standardized clinical photographs. On average, 4-5 mm of brow lift, 6-7 mm of hairline lowering, and 10-11 mm of forehead reduction were achieved, contributing to a more feminine appearance of the upper facial third.

Feminization of the Forehead: A Scoping Literature Review and Cohort Study of Transfeminine Patients

BACKGROUND

Facial feminization may be performed to alleviate gender dysphoria among transfeminine patients. The upper third of the face has several characteristics, including hairline shape and position, brow position, and forehead protrusion, that may confer feminine identity. The purpose of this study is to conduct a scoping literature review of techniques performed for forehead feminization and to additionally study clinical outcomes within an institutional cohort.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to review articles that discussed techniques and clinical outcomes associated with procedures performed for feminization of the upper third of the face. A retrospective review of patients undergoing such procedures by the senior author was then conducted. Variables collected included demographic factors, operative details, and postoperative outcomes such as complications, revisions, and re-operations.

RESULTS

Initial review yielded sixty-seven articles. Title and abstract review followed by standardized application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in a total of twenty-two studies for analysis. Priorities of forehead feminization entail frontal bossing reduction, frontonasal angle widening, orbital contouring, brow lifting, and hairline advancement. Eighty-five patients were included for analysis. The majority were of Caucasian race (56%) and had type 3 forehead classification (92%). The average planned setback of the anterior table was 4.12 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The core tenets of the feminization of the forehead lie in the overall creation of a harmonic curvature of the forehead with other facial features. Our multi-pronged analysis presents an updated review of these principles, which may help plastic surgeons in performing procedures to feminize the upper third of the face.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Estrogen hormone therapy stabilizes lateral hairline in transfeminine patients: Implications for facial feminization surgery

BACKGROUND

Although several studies report on the suppressing effects of estrogen therapy on facial and body hair in transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) individuals, few studies have elucidated its effects on hairline stability on the scalp. In this study, we assessed the influence of estrogen therapy on forehead length.

METHODS

All TGNB patients, aged 30 years or older, assigned male at birth (AMAB) seeking facial feminization surgery were included in the study. Central and forehead lengths were collected at the initial consultation visits. Variables, including age, duration of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), presence of spironolactone, and presence of other hair treatments, such as finasteride, dutasteride, or minoxidil, that potentially influence hair growth were collected by chart review. Multivariable linear regressions were constructed with relevant predictor variables while also incorporating global health scores as a proxy for psychological effects on hair loss.

RESULTS

Overall, 171 patients were included in this study, with a median age of 36.0 (interquartile range (IQR) 32.0-46.0) years and median HRT duration of 2.0 (IQR 1.0-6.0) years. Multivariable linear regressions revealed no significant predictors for central forehead length. However, lateral forehead length was positively predicted by age (B=0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.03-0.08], p < 0.001) and hair treatment (B=0.66, 95% CI [0.14-1.18], p = 0.01), but negatively predicted by HRT duration (B=-0.07, 95% CI [-0.10 to -0.04], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although older age is a predictor of lateral hairline recession in TGNB AMAB individuals, lateral forehead length was also predicted to decrease by 0.07 cm with each year of feminizing hormone therapy in patients over 30 years of age.

Flattening the Curve and Cutting Corners-Pearls and Pitfalls Facial Gender Affirming Surgery

Study Design

This is an experiential article based on the past 6 years experience of providing facial gender confirmation surgery (fGAS) at an academic medical center.

Objective

While trainees are getting increasing exposure to aspects of facial gender affirming surgery (fGAS), the gap between trained providers and patients who can access care is currently still widening. A handful of fellowships across the country have emerged that include fGAS in their curriculum, but it will take another decade before the principles of affirming care and surgeries are systematically taught. Fortunately, the surgical principles and techniques required to perform fGAS are part of the skill set of any specialty surgeon trained in adult craniofacial trauma and esthetic facial surgery/rhinoplasty. It is the aim of this article to provide directly applicable knowledge with the goal to assist surgeons who consider offering fGAS in flattening the learning curve and hopefully contribute to increasing the quality of care provided for the transgender and gender diverse population. We hope to provide the reader with a very tangible article with the aims to 1) provide a simple systematic framework for an affirming consultation and preoperative assessment and 2) provide translatable surgical pearls and pitfalls for forehead feminization and gonial angle resection. The frontal sinus set back and gonial angle resection in our opinion are the most unique aspect to fGAS as rhinoplasty, genioplasty and other associated procedures (e.g., fat grafting) follow well established principles. We hope that the value of this article lies in the translatability of the presented principle to any practice setting without the need for VSP, special surgical instruments or technology beyond basic craniofacial tools.

Methods

This is an experiential article based on the senior authors 6 year experience offering fGAS in an academic setting. The article is structured to outline both pearls and pittfalls and is supplemented by photographs and a surgical video.

Results

A total of 19 pearls and pitfalls are outlined in the article.

Conclusions

Facial gender affirming surgery mostly follows established craniofacial and esthetic surgery principles. Forehead feminization and gonial angle feminization are the 2 components that diverge most from established surgical techniques and this article hopefully provides guidance to shorten the learning curve of surgeons.

Ambulatory facial feminization surgery: a comparative analysis of outcomes and complications

BACKGROUND

To date, there are no studies investigating the safety and outcomes of facial feminization surgery (FFS) as an outpatient procedure. This is the first study of its kind analyzing the outcomes of ambulatory FFS based on a comparison of complications, post-operative emergency department or urgent care (ED/UC) visits, and readmissions between patients who underwent FFS with admission versus same-day surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients who underwent FFS in a single integrated healthcare system. Patient charts were reviewed for operative details, complications, post-operative ED/UC visits, readmission, and demographic factors. Major outcomes including complications, readmissions, and ED/UC visits were compared between groups with same-day discharge and post-operative hospital admission.

RESULTS

Of 242 patients included in the study, ED/UC visits were comparable between patients discharged same-day (18.2%) and patients admitted post-operatively (21.6%, p = 0.52). Logistic regression showed no significant difference in the composite outcomes of minor complications, major complications, and readmissions (15.6% for ambulatory versus 19.3% for admission, p = 0.46). Temporary nerve palsy, infection, and hematoma were the most common post-operative complications. However, covariates of a lower face procedure and operative time were shown to have significant differences in the composite complication outcome (p = 0.04 and p = 0.045, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory FFS is a safe practice with no associated increase in adverse outcomes including complications, ED/UC visits, and readmission when compared to post-operative admission. Adoption of same-day FFS should be considered by high-volume gender health centers to potentially benefit from increased scheduling flexibility and efficiency, increased access to care, and lower healthcare costs.

Outcomes in Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review

Objective: Review literature on facial feminization surgery (FFS) for the transgender population and identify whether heterogeneity in reported outcomes and outcome measures exists across studies, as measured by a lack of consensus, and number of outcomes and outcome measures used. Evidence Review: A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE (database inception to January 20, 2021) was performed to retrieve FFS studies. Primary outcomes included number of reported outcomes and outcome measures; secondary outcomes included clinimetric properties of outcome measures and study characteristics. Findings: In total, 15 articles were included. Sixty-nine outcomes and 12 outcome measures were identified. Of those outcome measures, zero were found to be valid, reliable, and responsive in patients who had undergone FFS. A variety of FFS interventions were studied, with the three most common interventions being: rhinoplasty (n = 7, 46.7%), mandibuloplasty (n = 7, 46.7%), and chondrolaryngoplasty (n = 6, 40%). Conclusion and Relevance: Heterogeneity was evident in reported outcomes and outcome measures in FFS literature and there is currently no outcome measure commonly used for this patient population.

Assessing Preferences of Facial Appearance in Transgender and Gender Nonbinary Patients

BACKGROUND

We designed a survey to evaluate preferences of facial appearance in transgender male (TM), transgender female (TF) and gender nonbinary patients to better inform goals of facial gender affirming surgery (FGAS) in gender nonbinary patients.

METHODS

TM/TF and nonbinary patients > 18 years old were identified via retrospective chart review and distributed an anonymized survey via email from October 3 to December 31, 2022. To assess facial preferences, AI-generated and open-source portraits were edited to create five image sets with a range of features from masculine to feminine for the forehead, mandible/chin and hairline. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests and ANOVA in R-Studio.

RESULTS

Survey response rate was 32% (180 patients identified via chart review, 58 respondents; TM = 5, TF = 39, nonbinary = 14). TM and TF patients as well as TF and nonbinary patients had significantly different preferences for all regions (p < 0.005; all series), while TM and nonbinary patients did not (p => 0.05; all series). TF patients consistently selected 4s with neutral or more feminine features. TM and nonbinary patients, however, demonstrated no consistent preference for either male or female features but rather a range of responses spanning extremes of both masculine and feminine options. When stratified by sex assigned at birth, nonbinary patients consistently identified preferences opposite to their assigned gender.

CONCLUSION

Gender nonbinary and TM patients appear to have uniquely individual preferences regarding facial appearance that do not fit into classically masculine or feminine patterns/phenotypes. As a result, we recommend individualized preoperative planning for FGAS to achieve the optimal result in these patient populations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Androgenetic alopecia in transgender and gender diverse populations: A review of therapeutics

Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) management is a significant clinical and therapeutic challenge for transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) patients. Although gender-affirming hormone therapies affect hair growth, there is little research about AGA in TGD populations. After reviewing the literature on approved treatments, off-label medication usages, and procedures for treating AGA, we present treatment options for AGA in TGD patients. The first-line treatments for any TGD patient include topical minoxidil 5% applied to the scalp once or twice daily, finasteride 1 mg oral daily, and/or low-level laser light therapy. Spironolactone 200 mg daily is also first-line for transfeminine patients. Second-line options include daily oral minoxidil dosed at 1.25 or 2.5 mg for transfeminine and transmasculine patients, respectively. Topical finasteride 0.25% monotherapy or in combination with minoxidil 2% solution are second-line options for transmasculine and transfeminine patients, respectively. Other second-line treatments for any TGD patient include oral dutasteride 0.5 mg daily, platelet-rich plasma, or hair restoration procedures. After 6-12 months of treatment, AGA severity and treatment progress should be assessed via scales not based on sex; eg, the Basic and Specific Classification or the Bouhanna scales. Dermatologists should coordinate care with the patient's primary gender-affirming clinician(s) so that shared knowledge of all medications exists across the care team.

Forehead Contouring

The upper third of the face has an important effect on gendering patients. Forehead contouring modifying a masculine face to a more feminine form is most likely to affect the gender assessment of an individual's face. Contouring involves techniques such as forehead reduction or augmentation, orbital contouring, and hairline adjustment. Traditionally, surgeons have utilized an open technique, though newer innovations such as endoscopic procedures and custom implants provide an alternative for patients with mild defects. Forehead contouring procedures are well tolerated with minimal side effects reported despite the proximity to the frontal sinus and cranial vault.

Conservative approach to facial upper third feminisation: a retrospective study

The aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction and postoperative quality of life following the combined procedure of frontal eminence milling and hairline advancement in the upper third feminisation. This study is based on the assessment of satisfaction data of Transgender adult patients. Postoperative patient quality of life was assessed by the Facial feminisation surgery outcomes evaluation and patient satisfaction was assessed by the Face-Q™. Forty eight patients were included. The age of the patients ranged from 20 to 63 years. According to the Facial feminisation surgery outcomes evaluation, 67.2% of patients were satisfied with the outcomes. 56.3% of the patients found the appearance of their faces "very much" and "completely" feminine. According to the Face-Q™, 79% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the position of their eyebrows post-operatively. 83.4% found their foreheads natural, 81.3% found their foreheads younger and 77.1% were satisfied or very satisfied with the smoothness of their forehead. Within the limitations of the study it seems that a combined procedure of frontal eminence milling and hairline advancement is an adequate treatment option forpatients with typically masculine features of the forehead and moderate to slight frontal eminences.

Sex-Related Characteristics of the Face

The face is central to individual identity and gender presentation. Sex-based differences are seen at nearly every component of the face, from craniofacial structure to skin and soft tissue distribution. This article provides a framework for identification and analysis of sex-based differences in facial anatomy. This can then be used to guide individualized approaches to surgical planning to create greater congruence between patients' existing physical features and goals for gender expression.

Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes

Background:

Facial feminization is a critical step in a transfeminine patient’s surgical transition. However, the existing literature on the various types of feminization surgeries suffers from inadequate reporting on perioperative aspects of care, such as preoperative evaluation and postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate facial feminization surgery (FFS), preoperative planning, and patient reported outcomes after various types of procedures.

Methods:

An electronic database search of Ovid MEDLINE was completed according to PRISMA guidelines for articles pertaining to FFS. Study characteristics, operative information, and patient demographics were collected. Data concerning preoperative imaging, virtual simulation, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected and analyzed for patterns.

Results:

A total of 22 papers representing 1302 patients were included for analysis. The most commonly discussed operations included upper face procedures, particularly of the forehead (17 studies, 77%). When discussed, preoperative planning for FFS included standard photography in 19 (86%) studies, advanced imaging, such as cephalometry or computed tomography, in 12 (55%) studies, and virtual simulation of surgical outcomes in four (18%) studies. Patient-centered outcomes, such as postoperative satisfaction, were described in 17 (77%) studies. Standardized PROMs were heterogenous across included studies with only 11 (50%) including at least one PROM.

Conclusions:

FFS is common, safe, and highly satisfying for transfeminine patients seeking surgical intervention for identity actualization. Future research concerning transgender care must evaluate advanced surgical planning and 3D simulation combined with more standardized assessment of PROMs to ensure high-quality analysis of patient satisfaction.

Dermatologic Care of Hair in Transgender Patients: A Systematic Review of Literature

Transgender patients on masculinizing and feminizing hormonal therapy undergo myriad physical and psychologic changes. Dermatologists are uniquely qualified to guide patients in the gender-affirming process, especially as it relates to hair. Given the paucity of literature guiding dermatologists in this process, a systematic review was performed to better understand the physiologic changes of hair in patients on masculinizing and feminizing hormonal therapy as well as the variety of treatment options that exist to help transgender patients to attain their desired hair growth pattern. This review reports findings and treatment options supported by the performed literature review as well as treatment recommendations based on the authors' own experiences treating this unique patient population.

Forehead Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes

Importance: Forehead reduction, or hairline lowering surgery, is becoming more popular as a cosmetic procedure for patients with disproportionately large foreheads. A large forehead can make a patient appear older, be masculinizing, and less attractive. Objective: To quantify reported outcomes in patients undergoing forehead reduction. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of adults undergoing forehead reduction. A review protocol was published in PROSPERO (CRD42020183366). A research librarian created search strategies in multiple databases. Abstracts and full texts were reviewed in duplicate. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool were used. Random effects meta-analyses were performed. The primary outcome was amount of reduction. Other extracted data included study type, location, sample size, scalp fixation method, incision, complications, follow-up time, percentage female, and age. Results: Our search strategy found 376 unique citations, and 8 studies were included. All eight were retrospective cohort studies, comprising 882 patients (range 5-525). Study quality was high, and risk of bias ranged from unclear to high. Four studies were included for meta-analysis, totaling 801 patients. Mean amount of reduction was 1.6 cm (95% confidence interval: 1.4-1.8). Complications included temporary and permanent alopecia, unacceptable scarring, persistent paresthesia, and hematoma. The pooled complication rate was 1% or less. Conclusion: Forehead reduction is associated with a low complication rate (<1%), and a mean lowering of 1.6 cm is reported. Future studies should report mean and standard deviation of reduction, and should follow patients for at least 12 months.

Gender affirming and aesthetic cranioplasty: what's new?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Esthetic cranioplasty is an important part of facial feminization surgery. Additionally, it is an often underappreciated procedure for facial beautification. This chapter reviews current trends in esthetic cranioplasty for transgender women and others. Valuable techniques and innovations that do not advance the field are reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although promoted in recent literature, among the key concepts discussed in this review are the limitations of cutting guides, the rare indications for preoperative imaging, and when burring the glabellar area is appropriate rather than doing a full osteoplastic flap setback.

SUMMARY

Forehead feminization cranioplasty is a highly dependent upon the surgeon's artistic ability. Modeling and guides are potentially helpful for the novice surgeon but better is to learn appropriate anatomy for a more refined result.