Transoral Versus Endoscopic Examination in Predicting Outcomes of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

State-Dependent Biomechanical Behavior of Oropharyngeal Structures in Apneic and Control Subjects: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Rationale: Apneic individuals have reduced airway caliber during sleep. The biomechanical changes in upper airway anatomy contributing to this airway narrowing are largely unknown. Objectives: We sought to investigate the state-dependent (wake vs. sleep) biomechanical behavior of the upper airway soft-tissue and craniofacial structures. Methods: Upper airway magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 15 sleep-deprived control subjects (apnea-hypopnea index, <5; 0.3 ± 0.5 events per hour) and 12 sleep-deprived apneic subjects (apnea-hypopnea index, ⩾5; 35.2 ± 18.1 events per hour) during wake and sleep and analyzed for airway measures and soft-tissue/mandibular movement. Results: In the retropalatal region, control subjects showed sleep-dependent reductions (P ⩽ 0.037) in average cross-sectional airway area (CSA), minimum CSA, and anteroposterior and lateral dimensions. Apneic subjects showed sleep-dependent reductions (P ⩽ 0.002) in average CSA, minimum CSA, and anteroposterior and lateral dimensions. In the retroglossal region, control subjects had no sleep-dependent airway reductions. However, apneic subjects had sleep-dependent reductions in minimal CSA (P = 0.001) and lateral dimensions (P = 0.014). Control subjects only showed sleep-dependent posterior movement of the anterior-inferior tongue octant (P = 0.039), whereas apneic subjects showed posterior movement of the soft palate (P = 0.006) and all tongue octants (P ⩽ 0.012). Sleep-dependent medial movement of the lateral walls was seen at the retropalatal minimum level (P = 0.013) in control subjects and at the retropalatal and retroglossal minimum levels (P ⩽ 0.017) in apneic subjects. There was posterior movement of the mandible in apneic subjects (P ⩽ 0.017). Conclusions: During sleep, control and apneic subjects showed reductions in retropalatal airway caliber, but only the apneic subjects showed retroglossal airway narrowing. Reductions in anteroposterior and lateral airway dimensions were primarily due to posterior soft palate, tongue and mandibular movement and to medial lateral wall movement. These data provide important initial insights into obstructive sleep apnea pathogenesis.

Noninvasive electrical stimulation of oropharyngeal muscles in obstructive sleep apnea

Introduction: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy remains the standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. However, its proven effect is useless if the patient does not tolerate the treatment. The electrical stimulation approach has been investigated for several decades now and it seems that the implantable devices for invasive electrical stimulation of hypoglossal nerve are viewed as effective with some of them already approved for human use.Areas covered: in this review, we intent to summarize the existing records of noninvasive stimulation in sleep apnea to make the scientific community aware of the details before deciding on its future. We believe that this is a battle still to fight and more could be done bearing in mind the safety of this method.Expertopinion: noninvasive electrical stimulation has been left behind based on few, small and inconsistent studies using different stimulation parameters. These studies are difficult to compare and to draw conclusions.Electrical stimulation is a field for research in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, with many aspects still to be discovered, and which may become a therapeutic alternative to the use of CPAP in certain patients.

Obstruction level associated with outcome in hypoglossal nerve stimulation

Purpose

Selective hypoglossal nerve stimulation (sHNS) constitutes an effective surgical alternative for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). sHNS results in tongue protrusion and consecutive alleviation of obstructions at the tongue base level (lower obstructions). Furthermore, obstructions at the soft palate level (upper obstructions) may be prevented through palatoglossal coupling as seen on sleep endoscopy. However, it has not been studied if the distribution of obstruction level during a whole night measurement is a relevant factor for the treatment outcome.

Methods

Obstruction levels were measured with a manometry system during a whole night of sleep in 26 patients with OSA (f = 1, m = 25; age 59.4 ± 11.3; BMI = 29.6 ± 3.6) either before (n = 9) or after sHNS implantation (n = 12). Five patients received a measurement before and after implantation. Obstructions were categorized into velar (soft palate and above), infravelar (below soft palate), and multilevel obstructions. An association between obstruction level and treatment outcome was calculated.

Results

The mean distribution of preoperative obstruction level could be divided into the following: 38% velar, 46% multilevel, and 16% infravelar obstructions. Patients with a good treatment response (defined as AHI < 15/h and AHI reduction of 50%) had fewer preoperative velar obstructions compared to non-responder (17% vs. 54%, p-value = 0.006). In patients measured after sHNS implantation, a significantly higher rate of multilevel obstructions per hour was measured in non-responders (p-value = 0.012).

Conclusions

Selective hypoglossal nerve stimulation was more effective in patients with fewer obstructions at the soft palate level. Manometry may be a complementary diagnostic procedure for the selection of patients for HNS.