Low Skeletal Muscle Mass Is a Risk Factor for Aspiration Pneumonia During Chemoradiotherapy

Development and validation of equations for predicting appendicular skeletal muscle mass in male patients with head and neck cancer and normal hydration status

OBJECTIVE

Muscle mass is typically assessed by abdominal computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. However, these tests are not routinely performed in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), making sarcopenia assessment difficult. The aim of this study was to develop and validate equations for predicting appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) from data obtained in daily medical practice, with bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-measured appendicular skeletal muscle mass (BIA-ASM) as a reference.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 103 men with HNC who were randomly placed into development and validation groups. The prediction equations for BIA-ASM were developed by multiple regression analysis and validated by Bland-Altman analyses. The estimated skeletal muscle mass index (eSMI) was also statistically evaluated to discriminate the cutoff value for BIA-measured SMI according to the Asian Working Groups for Sarcopenia.

RESULTS

Two practical equations, which included 24-h urinary creatinine excretion volume (24hUCrV), handgrip strength (HGS), body weight (BW), and body height (BHt), were developed: ASM (kg) = -39.46 + (3.557 × 24hUCrV [g]) + (0.08872 × HGS [kg]) + (0.1263 × BW [kg]) + (0.2661 × BHt [cm]) if available for 24hUCrV (adjusted R2 = 0.8905), and ASM (kg) = -42.60 + (0.1643 × HGS [kg]) + (0.1589 × BW [kg]) + (0.2807 × BHt [cm]) if not (adjusted R2 = 0.8589). ASM estimated by these two equations showed a significantly strong correlation with BIA-ASM (R > 0.900). Bland-Altman analyses showed a good agreement, and eSMI accuracy was high (>80%) in both equations.

CONCLUSIONS

These two equations are a valid option for estimating ASM and diagnosing sarcopenia in patients with HNC in all facilities without special equipment.

Comparison of the thickness of the erector spinae muscles between aspiration pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Aspiration pneumonia is generally associated with deterioration of skeletal muscle mass, which is usually evaluated by the erector spinae muscle cross-sectional area (ESMCSA); however, no report has assessed ESMCSA in patients with aspiration pneumonia. Furthermore, erector spinae muscle thickness (ESMT) was developed to be easier to measure than ESMCSA. Therefore, this study investigated the relationship between ESMT and ESMCSA in aspiration pneumonia patients compared to bacterial pneumonia patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data for 164 patients with aspiration pneumonia and 480 patients with bacterial pneumonia who were hospitalized at Fukujuji Hospital between September 2018 and May 2022. We assessed the correlations between ESMCSA and ESMT and compared the data between the two groups.

RESULTS

ESMT had a strong, proportional relationship with ESMCSA in all patients (r = 0.908, p < 0.001) and those with aspiration pneumonia (r = 0.896, p < 0.001). ESMCSA (median 671.8 mm2 [range 164.0-1636.7] vs. median 1057.0 mm2 [range 161.3-2412.5], p < 0.001) and ESMT (median 17.1 mm [range 6.95-34.4] vs. median 23.8 mm [range 6.95-43.7], p < 0.001) were significantly lower in patients with aspiration pneumonia. A multivariate analysis of aspiration pneumonia diagnosis showed significant independent differences from bacterial pneumonia in ESMCSA (odds ratio 0.998 [95% CI: 0.996-0.999], p = 0.001) and ESMT (odds ratio 0.90 [95% CI: 0.84-0.96], p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a strong correlation between ESMCSA and ESMT. ESMT can be more easily used to evaluate skeletal muscle mass and can help in diagnosing aspiration pneumonia.

Role of sarcopenia on survival and treatment-related toxicity in head and neck cancer: a narrative review of current evidence and future perspectives

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to provide an up-to-date summary of sarcopenia and its clinical implications for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS

We conducted a literature review of recent studies investigating the prevalence of sarcopenia in HNC patients, its detection using MRI or CT scans, and its association with clinical outcomes such as disease-free and overall survival time, radiotherapy-related side effects, cisplatin toxicity, and surgical complications.

RESULTS

Sarcopenia, characterized by low skeletal muscle mass (SMM), is a prevalent condition in HNC patients and can be effectively detected using routine MRI or CT scans. Low SMM in HNC patients is associated with increased risks of shorter disease-free and overall survival times, as well as radiotherapy-related side effects such as mucositis, dysphagia, and xerostomia. In addition, cisplatin toxicity is more severe in HNC patients with low SMM, leading to higher dose-limiting toxicity and treatment interruptions. Low SMM may also predict higher risks of surgical complications in head and neck surgery. Identifying sarcopenic patients can aid physicians in better riskstratifying HNC patients for therapeutic or nutritional interventions to improve clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia is a significant concern for HNC patients and can impact their clinical outcomes. Routine MRI or CT scans can effectively detect low SMM in HNC patients. Identifying sarcopenic patients can aid physicians in better risk-stratifying HNC patients for therapeutic or nutritional interventions to improve clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to explore the potential of interventions to mitigate the negative effects of sarcopenia in HNC patients.

Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Sarcopenia but Were Afraid to Ask: A Quick Guide for Radiation Oncologists (Impact of Sarcopenia in Radiotherapy: The AFRAID Project)

Sarcopenia (SP) is a syndrome characterized by age-associated loss of skeletal muscle mass and function. SP worsens both acute and late radiation-induced toxicity, prognosis, and quality of life. Myosteatosis is a pathological infiltration of muscle tissue by adipose tissue which often precedes SP and has a proven correlation with prognosis in cancer patients. Sarcopenic obesity is considered a "hidden form" of SP (due to large fat mass) and is independently related to higher mortality and worse complications after surgery and systemic treatments with worse prognostic impact compared to SP alone. The evaluation of SP is commonly based on CT images at the level of the middle of the third lumbar vertebra. On this scan, all muscle structures are contoured and then the outlined surface area is calculated. Several studies reported a negative impact of SP on overall survival in patients undergoing RT for tumors of the head and neck, esophagus, rectum, pancreas, cervix, and lung. Furthermore, several appetite-reducing side effects of RT, along with more complex radiation-induced mechanisms, can lead to SP through, but not limited to, reduced nutrition. In particular, in pediatric patients, total body irradiation was associated with the onset of SP and other changes in body composition leading to an increased risk of cardiometabolic morbidity in surviving adults. Finally, some preliminary studies showed the possibility of effectively treating SP and preventing the worsening of SP during RT. Future studies should be able to provide information on how to prevent and manage SP before, during, or after RT, in both adult and pediatric patients.

Measurement of Sarcopenia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients and Its Association With Frailty

In head and neck cancer (HNC) there is a need for more personalized treatment based on risk assessment for treatment related adverse events (i.e. toxicities and complications), expected survival and quality of life. Sarcopenia, defined as a condition characterized by loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, can predict adverse outcomes in HNC patients. A review of the literature on the measurement of sarcopenia in head and neck cancer patients and its association with frailty was performed. Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) measurement only is often used to determine if sarcopenia is present or not. SMM is most often assessed by measuring skeletal muscle cross-sectional area on CT or MRI at the level of the third lumbar vertebra. As abdominal scans are not always available in HNC patients, measurement of SMM at the third cervical vertebra has been developed and is frequently used. Frailty is often defined as an age-related cumulative decline across multiple physiologic systems, with impaired homeostatic reserve and a reduced capacity of the organism to withstand stress, leading to increased risk of adverse health outcomes. There is no international standard measure of frailty and there are multiple measures of frailty. Both sarcopenia and frailty can predict adverse outcomes and can be used to identify vulnerable patients, select treatment options, adjust treatments, improve patient counselling, improve preoperative nutritional status and anticipate early on complications, length of hospital stay and discharge. Depending on the definitions used for sarcopenia and frailty, there is more or less overlap between both conditions. However, it has yet to be determined if sarcopenia and frailty can be used interchangeably or that they have additional value and should be used in combination to optimize individualized treatment in HNC patients.

Prognostic impact of sarcopenia in patients with head and neck cancer treated with surgery or radiation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare the prognostic impact of sarcopenia in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with surgery or radiation.

METHODS

We systematically searched electronic databases to identify articles reporting the impact of sarcopenia on the prognosis of patients with HNC. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were extracted and pooled. HR according to treatment modality were estimated using random-effects models. Statistical analyses were carried out using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software.

RESULTS

In total, 18 studies enrolling 3,233 patients were included. Sarcopenia was associated with poor OS in both surgery and radiotherapy groups (hazard ratio [HR] 2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.95-3.21; HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.40-1.90, respectively). The HR was significantly higher in the surgery group than in the radiotherapy group (p = 0.004), with similar results obtained for DFS (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.56-4.31; HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.24-1.97 for the surgery and radiotherapy groups, respectively) and DSS (HR 2.96, 95% CI 0.73-11.95; HR 2.67, 95% CI 1.51-4.73 for the surgery and RT groups, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia was a poor prognostic factor for HNC, regardless of the treatment modality. However, the adverse effects of sarcopenia on survival were more prominent in the surgery group than in the radiotherapy group. Sarcopenia assessment is required for appropriate treatment decision-making.