Contemporary Incremental Healthcare Costs for Chronic Rhinosinusitis in the United States

Evolving Utilization of Topical Budesonide Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Topical budesonide irrigations are frequently prescribed after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) to manage mucosal inflammation. However, this off-label indication may conflict with health insurance formularies. We sought to quantify the relative frequency of postoperative budesonide prescriptions to determine if this could be considered common practice after ESS. We extracted and analyzed postoperative prescription data for patients undergoing ESS from 2016 to 2022 within our health care system. Overall, among 8157 ESS patients, 15.9% and 22.1% received topical budesonide prescriptions within 30 or 180 days postoperatively, respectively. On a year-over-year basis, budesonide prescription frequency increased significantly over time, culminating at 20.3% and 24.9% in 2022. Conversely, postoperative oral corticosteroid (OCS) prescriptions showed a decreasing frequency over the same time period (P < .001). Our results show topical budesonide irrigations are increasingly frequently prescribed after ESS and may offset postoperative OCS requirements. This argues for coverage of topical budesonide as a formulary medication after ESS.

Clinical and economic benefits of image-guided system in functional endoscopicsinus surgery: a retrospective chart review study in China

BACKGROUND

Image-guided system (IGS) has been gradually applied in the field of rhinology, making functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) a truly minimally invasive and precise surgery. This study was based on real-world data from China hospitals and aimed to evaluate the clinical and economic benefits of the IGS navigation system in FESS.

METHODS

This was a two-center retrospective chart review of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent FESS, including open frontal sinus between July 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019 in China. The intervention group consisted of 100 patients who underwent FESS with the IGS navigation system (IGS group), and the control group consisted of 100 patients who underwent conventional FESS (Non-IGS group). Data were collected from surgical notes and hospital medical records. The primary endpoints for clinical effectiveness and safety were avoid rehospitalization due to bleeding, avoid reoperation due to bleeding, and avoid reoperation due to recurrence.

RESULTS

There were no cases of rehospitalization due to bleeding, reoperation due to bleeding, and reoperation due to recurrence in the IGS group, with an avoidance rate of 100%. In the non-IGS group, there were four cases of rehospitalization and reoperation due to bleeding, with an avoidance rate 96.00% (P = 0.121). No cases of reoperation due to recurrence were in the non-IGS group. The total hospitalization cost was 17,391.51 CNY in the IGS group and 17,742.41 CNY in the non-IGS group per patient, with no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.715). Compared with the non-IGS group, the IGS group had an overall cost saving of 350.90 CNY per patient. Although the procedure-related medical costs of IGS group were increased by 1,286.12 CNY compared with the non-IGS group, this was more than offset by other costs.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study indicated that the IGS may avoid occurrence of rehospitalization and reoperation due to postoperative bleeding. Although the use of navigation technology increased the cost of surgery, its clinical effectiveness brought other medical cost savings, resulting in no significant difference in the overall cost of navigation surgery compared to conventional surgery. The IGS should be considered cost-effectiveness in the treatment of FESS.

Disease control in chronic rhinosinusitis: a qualitative study of patient perspectives

BACKGROUND

The definition of disease control in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an active area of study. However, investigations have not engaged CRS patients in how they think about disease control. This study seeks to understand the patient perspective on CRS disease control.

METHODS

Qualitative phenomenological study using constant comparative methodology was applied. The research team conducted 10, one-on-one interviews with CRS patients ranging from 22 to 55 minutes in length. The content of the interview protocol was determined through iterative discussion amongst all authors. Two authors served as coders to identify recurrent themes. Themes were analyzed for meaning and conclusions were summarized.

RESULTS

Three recurring themes determined from patients were that (1) use of the terminology "control" adequately represents this phenomenon, (2) components of control could be classified into four main themes relating to CRS symptomatology, exacerbation of comorbid disease, quality of life and acute exacerbations of CRS, and (3) when patients deem their CRS is uncontrolled they are more willing to escalate their treatment to include escalating their daily maintenance regimen, seeking otolaryngology referral, taking rescue medication or undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

CRS patients consider their daily symptoms, the severity and frequency of CRS exacerbations, impact on quality of life as well as exacerbation of comorbid disease when thinking about their disease control. Disease control is a goal of treatment for patients and uncontrolled disease motivates patients to seek further treatment. Physicians should explore all components of CRS control when considering disease status and need for further treatment.

Contemporary Incremental Healthcare Costs for Allergic Rhinitis in the United States

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Describe contemporary changes in healthcare expenditure and utilization associated with allergic rhinitis (AR) over the past decade.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis.

METHODS

Patients reporting a diagnosis of AR were extracted from the 2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and linked to the consolidated expenditures file. AR patients were then compared to non-AR patients to demonstrate differences in healthcare utilization for office visits, emergency facility visits, and prescriptions. In addition, differences in total healthcare costs, office-based costs, and prescription costs were calculated, using demographic- and comorbidity-adjusted multivariate models. Results were compared to those obtained in 2007.

RESULTS

In 2018, an estimated 1.94 ± 0.2 million adult patients reported AR (0.8% of the US population receiving medical care), a 90% decrease from the 17.8 ± 0.7 million patients seen in a formal healthcare setting for AR in 2007 (7.9%). AR patients still formally seen in 2018 had an average of 4.4 ± 1.3 more office visits (P = .001) and 9.7 ± 2.2 more prescription fills (P < .001) than non-AR patients. In contrast to the 2007 findings, there was no difference in total health care expenditure per person with AR per year. When comparing total healthcare expenditure between 2018 and 2007, there was a net decrease of $1,176 per person with AR per year (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients reporting AR in a formal healthcare encounter fell significantly over the past decade, and per-person expenditure associated with an AR diagnosis also decreased significantly. The transition of nasal corticosteroids to over-the-counter was potentially a key driver behind these changes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2021.