Effects of Different Voice Rest on Vocal Function After Microlaryngeal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Seven Days of Voice Rest Post-phonosurgery Is Not Better than 3 days: A Prospective Randomized Short-term Outcome Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to compare the short-term effect of 7 versus 3 days of voice rest (VR) on objective vocal (acoustic) parameters following phonosurgery.

METHODS

A prospective randomized study conducted at a tertiary referral medical center. Patients with vocal fold nodules, polyps, or cysts and scheduled for phonosurgery were recruited from the Voice Clinic. They were randomized into groups of 7- or 3-day postoperative VR periods and their voices were recorded preoperatively and at 4-week postoperatively. A mixed linear model statistical analysis (MLMSA) was used to compare pre- and postoperative jitter, shimmer, harmonic-to-noise ratio, and maximum phonation time between the two groups.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were recruited, but only 34 fully complied with the study protocol, and their data were included in the final analysis (19 males, 20 females; mean age: 40.6 years; 17 patients in the 7-day VR group and 16 in the 3-day VR group). The groups were comparable in age, sex, and type of vocal lesion distribution. The preoperative MLMSA showed no significant group differences in the tested vocal parameters. Both groups exhibited significant (p < 0.05) and comparable improvement in all vocal parameters at postoperative week 4.

CONCLUSIONS

A VR duration of 7 days showed no greater benefit on the examined vocal parameters than the 3-day protocol 4-week postoperatively. Our results suggest that a 3-day VR regimen can be followed by patients who undergo phonosurgery without compromising the vocal results. Larger-scale and longer-duration studies are needed to confirm our findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Laryngoscope, 134:4661-4666, 2024.

Is Postoperative Voice Rest Unnecessary? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Voice Rest Recommendation Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Voice rest (VR) is widely recommended after microlaryngeal surgery to facilitate recovery and improve voice outcomes. Our study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing the impact of postoperative absolute voice rest (AVR) and no voice rest (NVR) instructions on voice outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched using "voice rest laryngeal surgery" and "postoperative voice rest" for articles published before December 2022. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB2 tools. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed for studies comparing Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) outcomes between NVR and AVR. Analysis was performed in R Studio.

RESULTS

In total, 255 articles were reviewed, 24 underwent full-text screening, and nine met inclusion criteria. Four randomized control trials (RCT) and one retrospective review compared AVR durations (range: 2-10days). Four studies (two cohort, one cross-sectional, and one RCT) compared AVR to NVR. All studies had risk of bias (ROBINS-I: two moderate, two serious; RoB2: five with concerns). Comparing AVR durations, two found no difference between short and long duration, while two reported improved outcomes for the short cohort. In studies comparing AVR to NVR, all concluded no significant difference in outcomes. Pooled analysis of three studies (355 patients) comparing NVR and AVR demonstrated no significant differences in pre- and postoperative VHI-10 change (mean difference=-0.87; 95% CI, -2.51 to 0.77; P = 0.27).

CONCLUSION

Systematic review findings indicate postoperative VR may not lead to improved voice outcomes, and a meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in VHI-10 outcomes between AVR and NVR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Does forced whisper have an impact on voice parameters?

OBJECTIVES

There has been the assumption that whispering may impact vocal function, leading to the widespread recommendation against its practice after phonosurgery. However, the extent to which whispering affects vocal function and vocal fold oscillation patterns remains unclear.

METHODS

10 vocally healthy subjects (5 male, 5 female) were instructed to forcefully whisper a standardized text for 10 min at a sound level of 70 dB(A), measured at a microphone distance of 30 cm to the mouth. Prior to and following the whisper loading, the dysphonia severity index was assessed. Simultaneously, recordings of high speed videolaryngoscopy (HSV), electroglottography, and audio signals during sustained phonation on the vowel /i/ (250 Hz for females and 125 Hz for males) were analyzed after segmentation of the HSV material.

RESULTS

The pre-post analysis revealed only minor changes after the intervention. These changes included a rise in minimum intensity, an increase in the glottal area waveform-derived open quotient, and the glottal gap index. However, no statistically significant changes were observed in the harmonic-to-noise-ratio, the glottal- to-noise-excitation-ratio, and the electroglottographic open quotient.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the study suggests that there are only small effects on vocal function in consequence of a forced whisper loading.

Clinical Voice Outcomes for Two Voice Rest Protocols after Phonomicrosurgery

OBJECTIVES

Voice rest is commonly recommended for patients with benign vocal fold lesions (BVFLs) after phonomicrosurgery. The study compares the clinical voice outcomes of two protocols, 7-day complete voice rest (CVR) and 3-day CVR followed by 4-day relative voice rest (CVR + RVR), for patients with BVFLs after phonomicrosurgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized controlled trial.

METHOD

Patients with BVFLs undergoing phonomicrosurgery were recruited prospectively and randomly assigned to either protocol. Outcomes were assessed on objective measures of acoustics (fundamental frequency, frequency range, mean intensity, cepstral peak analysis) and aerodynamics (vital capacity, airflow rate, subglottal pressure, phonation threshold pressure), as well as subjective measures, both provider-reported through the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and patient-reported through the Voice Handicap Index (VHI). Clinical measures were collected at three-time points: preoperatively, 1-week postoperatively (on voice rest), and 1-month postoperatively. In addition, adherence was estimated using a vocal dosimeter.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were recruited and randomized to 7-day CVR (n = 13) and CVR + RVR regimen (n = 12). Statistically significant changes were found within both groups for subglottal pressure (p = 0.03) and VHI score (p < 0.001) comparing pre-operative baseline to 1-month postoperative follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups. Regardless of group assignment, a significant decrease in overall severity ratings for the CAPE-V was found by comparing the preoperative scores to postoperative scores at 1-week (p < 0.001) and 1-month (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both groups improved their overall voice quality comparably 1 month after undergoing phonomicrosurgery as measured by objective and subjective parameters.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

2. Laryngoscope, 134:2812-2818, 2024.

The Efficacy of Different Voice Treatments for Vocal Fold Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Vocal fold polyps (VFP) are a common cause of voice disorders and laryngeal discomfort. They are usually treated by behavioral voice therapy (VT) or phonosurgery, or a combination (CT) of both. However, the superiority of either of these treatments has not been clearly established.

METHODS

Three databases were searched from inception to October 2022 and a manual search was performed. All clinical trials of VFP treatment were included that reported at least auditory-perceptual judgment, aerodynamics, acoustics, and the patient-perceived handicap.

RESULTS

We identified 31 eligible studies (VT: n = 47-194; phonosurgery: n = 404-1039; CT: n = 237-350). All treatment approaches were highly effective, with large effect sizes (d > 0.8) and significant improvements in almost all voice parameters (p-values < 0.05). Phonosurgery reduced roughness and NHR, and the emotional and functional subscales of the VHI-30 were the most compared to behavioral voice therapy and combined treatment (p-values < 0.001). Combined treatment improved hoarseness, jitter, shimmer, MPT, and the physical subscale of the VHI-30 more than phonosurgery and behavioral voice therapy (p-values < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

All three treatment approaches were effective in eliminating vocal fold polyps or their negative sequelae, with phonosurgery and combined treatment providing the greatest improvement. These results may inform future treatment decisions for patients with vocal fold polyps.