1
|
Easterling D, Perry A, Miller D. Implementing the learning health system paradigm within academic health centers. Learn Health Syst 2024; 8:e10367. [PMID: 38249847 PMCID: PMC10797573 DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The learning health system (LHS) concept represents a bold innovation that combines organizational learning, strategic analysis of patient data, stakeholder engagement and the systematic translation of research into practice - all in service of improving the quality of health care delivered across the organization. This innovation has been diffused and widely adopted by healthcare organizations over the past 15 years, but academic health centers (AHCs) have been slower on the uptake. The irony is that AHCs have the resources (e.g., trained researchers, sophisticated clinical data systems, informatics infrastructure) that are necessary to do the highest-quality and most impactful LHS work. Methods Based on a review of publications describing how AHCs have implemented LHS work, as well as the authors' direct experience promoting the adoption of the LHS paradigm at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (AHWFB), we:identify a set of factors that have inhibited broader adoption of the LHS paradigm among AHCs; distinguish between the forms of LHS work that are consistent and inconsistent with the mission of AHCs; and offer recommendations for broader adoption and fuller implementation of the LHS paradigm. Results The LHS paradigm represents an expansion of the scientific paradigm which serves as the foundation of research enterprise within AHCs. Both paradigms value rigorous studies of new treatments and practices, including pragmatic clinical trials. The LHS paradigm also places a high value on quality improvement studies, organizational learning, and the translation of research findings into improved patient care and operations within the local health system. The two paradigms differ on the origin of the research question, i.e., a pressing patient-care issue facing the health system versus the investigator's own research interests. Academic researchers have been disincentivized from pursuing at least some forms of LHS research. However, a growing number of AHCs are finding ways to integrate the LHS paradigm into their research enterprise, either by providing research faculty with institutional funding to cover their effort on studies that address the health system's priority issues, or by establishing an institute dedicated to LHS research. Conclusions The LHS paradigm is a disruptive intervention for AHCs, one that was initially resisted but is increasingly being embraced. AHCs are developing strategies for conducting LHS research, typically in parallel to the more traditional biomedical science that is core to academic medicine. Full implementation of the LHS paradigm will require further alignment between LHS and science, including a shift in the criteria for promotion and tenure to support those researchers who choose to focus on the pressing issues facing the health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Easterling
- Department of Social Sciences and Health PolicyWake Forest University School of MedicineWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
- Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science InstituteWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Anna Perry
- Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science InstituteWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - David Miller
- Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science InstituteWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
- Department of Internal MedicineWake Forest University School of MedicineWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Somerville M, Cassidy C, Curran JA, Johnson C, Sinclair D, Elliott Rose A. Implementation strategies and outcome measures for advancing learning health systems: a mixed methods systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:120. [PMID: 38012681 PMCID: PMC10680228 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01071-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Learning health systems strive to continuously integrate data and evidence into practice to improve patient outcomes and ensure value-based healthcare. While the LHS concept is gaining traction, the operationalization of LHSs is underexplored. OBJECTIVE To identify and synthesize the existing evidence on the implementation and evaluation of advancing learning health systems across international health care settings. METHODS A mixed methods systematic review was conducted. Six databases (CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PAIS, Scopus and Nursing at Allied Health Database) were searched up to July 2022 for terms related to learning health systems, implementation, and evaluation measures. Any study design, health care setting and population were considered for inclusion. No limitations were placed on language or date of publication. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts of identified articles. Data were extracted and synthesized using a convergent integrated approach. Studies were critically appraised using relevant JBI critical appraisal checklists. RESULTS Thirty-five studies were included in the review. Most studies were conducted in the United States (n = 21) and published between 2019 and 2022 (n = 24). Digital data capture was the most common LHS characteristic reported across studies, while patient engagement, aligned governance and a culture of rapid learning and improvement were reported least often. We identified 33 unique strategies for implementing LHSs including: change record systems, conduct local consensus discussions and audit & provide feedback. A triangulation of quantitative and qualitative data revealed three integrated findings related to the implementation of LHSs: (1) The digital infrastructure of LHSs optimizes health service delivery; (2) LHSs have a positive impact on patient care and health outcomes; and (3) LHSs can influence health care providers and the health system. CONCLUSION This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the implementation of LHSs in various healthcare settings. While this review identified key implementation strategies, potential outcome measures, and components of functioning LHSs, further research is needed to better understand the impact of LHSs on patient, provider and population outcomes, and health system costs. Health systems researchers should continue to apply the LHS concept in practice, with a stronger focus on evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christine Cassidy
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Trinkley KE, Ho PM, Glasgow RE, Huebschmann AG. How Dissemination and Implementation Science Can Contribute to the Advancement of Learning Health Systems. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2022; 97:1447-1458. [PMID: 35796045 PMCID: PMC9547828 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000004801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Many health systems are working to become learning health systems (LHSs), which aim to improve the value of health care by rapidly, continuously generating evidence to apply to practice. However, challenges remain to advance toward the aspirational goal of becoming a fully mature LHS. While some important challenges have been well described (i.e., building system-level supporting infrastructure and the accessibility of inclusive, integrated, and actionable data), other key challenges are underrecognized, including balancing evaluation rapidity with rigor, applying principles of health equity and classic ethics, focusing on external validity and reproducibility (generalizability), and designing for sustainability. Many LHSs focus on continuous learning cycles, but with limited consideration of issues related to the rapidity of these learning cycles, as well as the sustainability or generalizability of solutions. Some types of data have been consistently underrepresented, including patient-reported outcomes and preferences, social determinants, and behavioral and environmental data, the absence of which can exacerbate health disparities. A promising approach to addressing many challenges that LHSs face may be found in dissemination and implementation (D&I) science. With an emphasis on multilevel dynamic contextual factors, representation of implementation partner engagement, pragmatic research, sustainability, and generalizability, D&I science methods can assist in overcoming many of the challenges facing LHSs. In this article, the authors describe the current state of LHSs and challenges to becoming a mature LHS, propose solutions to current challenges, focusing on the contributions of D&I science with other methods, and propose key components and characteristics of a mature LHS model that others can use to plan and develop their LHSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katy E Trinkley
- K.E. Trinkley is associate professor, Departments of Clinical Pharmacy and Medicine and Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, and clinical informaticist, Department of Clinical Informatics, UCHealth, Aurora, Colorado; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2041-7404
| | - P Michael Ho
- P.M. Ho is professor, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, and professor, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-6266
| | - Russell E Glasgow
- R.E. Glasgow is research professor, Department of Family Medicine, and director, Dissemination and Implementation Science Program, ACCORDS, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4218-3231
| | - Amy G Huebschmann
- A.G. Huebschmann is associate professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, ACCORDS and Ludeman Family Center for Women's Health Research, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9329-3142
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Frontera WR, Stucki G, Engkasan JP, Francisco GE, Gutenbrunner C, Hasnan N, Lains J, Yusof YM, Negrini S, Omar Z, Battistella LR, Sowa G, Stam H, Bickenbach J. Advancing Academic Capacity in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine to Strengthen Rehabilitation in Health Systems Worldwide: A Joint Effort by the European Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine, the Association of Academic Physiatrists, and the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2022; 101:897-904. [PMID: 35777886 PMCID: PMC9377495 DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000002067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
5
|
Frontera W, Stucki G, Engkasan J, Francisco G, Gutenbrunner C, Hasnan N, Lains J, Yusof Y, Negrini S, Omar Z, Battistella L, Sowa G, Stam H, Bickenbach J. Advancing academic capacity in physical and rehabilitation medicine to strengthen rehabilitation in health systems worldwide: A joint effort by the european academy of rehabilitation medicine, the association of academic physiatrists, and the international society of physical and rehabilitation medicine. THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/ijprm.jisprm-000168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
6
|
Easterling D, Perry AC, Woodside R, Patel T, Gesell SB. Clarifying the concept of a learning health system for healthcare delivery organizations: Implications from a qualitative analysis of the scientific literature. Learn Health Syst 2021; 6:e10287. [PMID: 35434353 PMCID: PMC9006535 DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The “learning health system” (LHS) concept has been defined in broad terms, which makes it challenging for health system leaders to determine exactly what is required to transform their organization into an LHS. This study provides a conceptual map of the LHS landscape by identifying the activities, principles, tools, and conditions that LHS researchers have associated with the concept. Through a multi‐step screening process, two researchers identified 79 publications from PubMed (published before January 2020) that contained information relevant to the question, “What work is required of a healthcare organization that is operating as an LHS?” Those publications were coded as to whether or not they referenced each of 94 LHS elements in the taxonomy developed by the study team. This taxonomy, named the Learning Health Systems Consolidated Framework (LHS‐CF), organizes the elements into five “bodies of work” (organizational learning, translation of evidence into practice, building knowledge, analyzing clinical data, and engaging stakeholders) and four “enabling conditions” (workforce skilled for LHS work, data systems and informatics technology in place, organization invests resources in LHS work, and supportive organizational culture). We report the frequency that each of the 94 elements was referenced across the 79 publications. The four most referenced elements were: “organization builds knowledge or evidence,” “quality improvement practices are standard practice,” “patients and family members are actively engaged,” and “organizational culture emphasizes and supports learning.” By dissecting the LHS construct into its component elements, the LHS‐CF taxonomy can serve as a useful tool for LHS researchers and practitioners in defining the aspects of LHS they are addressing. By assessing how often each element is referenced in the literature, the study provides guidance to health system leaders as to how their organization needs to evolve in order to become an LHS ‐ while also recognizing that each organization should emphasize elements that are most aligned with their mission and goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Easterling
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA
| | - Anna C. Perry
- Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA
| | - Rachel Woodside
- Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA
| | - Tanha Patel
- North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute University of North Carolina School of Medicine Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
| | - Sabina B. Gesell
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schleyer T, Williams L, Gottlieb J, Weaver C, Saysana M, Azar J, Sadowski J, Frederick C, Hui S, Kara A, Ruppert L, Zappone S, Bushey M, Grout R, Embi PJ. The Indiana Learning Health System Initiative: Early experience developing a collaborative, regional learning health system. Learn Health Syst 2021; 5:e10281. [PMID: 34277946 PMCID: PMC8278436 DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Learning health systems (LHSs) are usually created and maintained by single institutions or healthcare systems. The Indiana Learning Health System Initiative (ILHSI) is a new multi-institutional, collaborative regional LHS initiative led by the Regenstrief Institute (RI) and developed in partnership with five additional organizations: two Indiana-based health systems, two schools at Indiana University, and our state-wide health information exchange. We report our experiences and lessons learned during the initial 2-year phase of developing and implementing the ILHSI. METHODS The initial goals of the ILHSI were to instantiate the concept, establish partnerships, and perform LHS pilot projects to inform expansion. We established shared governance and technical capabilities, conducted a literature review-based and regional environmental scan, and convened key stakeholders to iteratively identify focus areas, and select and implement six initial joint projects. RESULTS The ILHSI successfully collaborated with its partner organizations to establish a foundational governance structure, set goals and strategies, and prioritize projects and training activities. We developed and deployed strategies to effectively use health system and regional HIE infrastructure and minimize information silos, a frequent challenge for multi-organizational LHSs. Successful projects were diverse and included deploying a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Standards (FHIR)-based tool across emergency departments state-wide, analyzing free-text elements of cross-hospital surveys, and developing models to provide clinical decision support based on clinical and social determinants of health. We also experienced organizational challenges, including changes in key leadership personnel and varying levels of engagement with health system partners, which impacted initial ILHSI efforts and structures. Reflecting on these early experiences, we identified lessons learned and next steps. CONCLUSIONS Multi-organizational LHSs can be challenging to develop but present the opportunity to leverage learning across multiple organizations and systems to benefit the general population. Attention to governance decisions, shared goal setting and monitoring, and careful selection of projects are important for early success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Titus Schleyer
- Center for Biomedical InformaticsRegenstrief Institute, IncIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- Department of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Linda Williams
- Center for Health Services ResearchRegenstrief Institute, IncIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- Department of NeurologyIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- VA HSR&D EXTEND QUERIRichard L. Roudebush VA Medical CenterIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Jonathan Gottlieb
- Department of Health AdministrationUniversity of ProvidenceGreat FallsMontanaUSA
| | - Christopher Weaver
- Department of Emergency MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- Physician AdministrationIndiana University HealthIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Michele Saysana
- Physician AdministrationIndiana University HealthIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- Department of PediatricsIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Jose Azar
- Department of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- Division of Quality and Patient SafetyIndiana University HealthIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Josh Sadowski
- Department of Infection PreventionIndiana University HealthIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Chris Frederick
- AdministrationRegenstrief Institute, IncIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Siu Hui
- Center for Biomedical InformaticsRegenstrief Institute, IncIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- Department of Biostatistics & Health Data ScienceIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Areeba Kara
- Department of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Laura Ruppert
- Center for Biomedical InformaticsRegenstrief Institute, IncIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Sarah Zappone
- Center for Biomedical InformaticsRegenstrief Institute, IncIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Michael Bushey
- Department of PsychiatryIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- Department of PsychiatryIndiana University HealthIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Randall Grout
- Center for Biomedical InformaticsRegenstrief Institute, IncIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- Department of PediatricsIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- InformaticsEskenazi HealthIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Peter J. Embi
- Department of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- AdministrationRegenstrief Institute, IncIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- AdministrationIndiana University HealthIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nash DM, Bhimani Z, Rayner J, Zwarenstein M. Learning health systems in primary care: a systematic scoping review. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2021; 22:126. [PMID: 34162336 PMCID: PMC8223335 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01483-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Learning health systems have been gaining traction over the past decade. The purpose of this study was to understand the spread of learning health systems in primary care, including where they have been implemented, how they are operating, and potential challenges and solutions. METHODS We completed a scoping review by systematically searching OVID Medline®, Embase®, IEEE Xplore®, and reviewing specific journals from 2007 to 2020. We also completed a Google search to identify gray literature. RESULTS We reviewed 1924 articles through our database search and 51 articles from other sources, from which we identified 21 unique learning health systems based on 62 data sources. Only one of these learning health systems was implemented exclusively in a primary care setting, where all others were integrated health systems or networks that also included other care settings. Eighteen of the 21 were in the United States. Examples of how these learning health systems were being used included real-time clinical surveillance, quality improvement initiatives, pragmatic trials at the point of care, and decision support. Many challenges and potential solutions were identified regarding data, sustainability, promoting a learning culture, prioritization processes, involvement of community, and balancing quality improvement versus research. CONCLUSIONS We identified 21 learning health systems, which all appear at an early stage of development, and only one was primary care only. We summarized and provided examples of integrated health systems and data networks that can be considered early models in the growing global movement to advance learning health systems in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Nash
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada. .,ICES, London, ON, Canada.
| | - Zohra Bhimani
- Department of Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer Rayner
- Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Department of Research and Evaluation, Alliance for Healthier Communities, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Merrick Zwarenstein
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Martani A, Geneviève LD, Egli SM, Erard F, Wangmo T, Elger BS. Evolution or Revolution? Recommendations to Improve the Swiss Health Data Framework. Front Public Health 2021; 9:668386. [PMID: 34136456 PMCID: PMC8200489 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.668386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Facilitating access to health data for public health and research purposes is an important element in the health policy agenda of many countries. Improvements in this sense can only be achieved with the development of an appropriate data infrastructure and the implementations of policies that also respect societal preferences. Switzerland is a revealing example of a country that has been struggling to achieve this aim. The objective of the study is to reflect on stakeholders' recommendations on how to improve the health data framework of this country. Methods: We analysed the recommendations collected as part of a qualitative study including 48 expert stakeholders from Switzerland that have been working principally with health databases. Recommendations were divided in themes and subthemes according to applied thematic analysis. Results: Stakeholders recommended several potential improvements of the health data framework in Switzerland. At the general level of mind-set and attitude, they suggested to foster the development of an explicit health data strategy, better communication and the respect of societal preferences. In terms of infrastructure, there were calls for the creation of a national data center, the improvement of IT solutions and the use of a Unique Identifier for patient data. Lastly, they recommended harmonising procedures for data access and to clarify data protection and consent rules. Conclusion: Recommendations show several potential improvements of the health data framework, but they have to be reconciled with existing policies, infrastructures and ethico-legal limitations. Achieving a gradual implementation of the recommended solutions is the preferable way forward for Switzerland and a lesson for other countries that are also seeking to improve health data access for public health and research purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Martani
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Sophia Mira Egli
- Master Student, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Frédéric Erard
- SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Tenzin Wangmo
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Bernice Simone Elger
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,University Center of Legal Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Establishing a learning healthcare system to improve health outcomes for people with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2021; 117:107805. [PMID: 33588319 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the organization of the Epilepsy Learning Healthcare System (ELHS), a network that aims to improve care outcomes for people with epilepsy (PWE). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients and family partners, providers, researchers, epidemiologists, and other leaders collaborated to recruit epilepsy centers and community services organizations into a novel learning network. A multidisciplinary Coordinating Committee developed ELHS governance and organizational structure, including four key planning Cores (Community, Clinical, Quality Improvement, and Data). Through Quality Improvement (QI) methodology grounded in the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) model, including iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) rapid learning cycles and other learning and sharing sessions, ELHS equipped epilepsy centers and community organizations with tools to standardize, measure, share, and improve key aspects of epilepsy care. The initial learning cycles addressed provider documentation of seizure frequency and type, and also screening for medication adherence barriers. Rapid learning cycles have been carried out on these initial measures in both clinical centers and community-based settings. Additional key measures have been defined for quality of life, screening, and treatment for mental health and behavioral comorbidities, transition from pediatric to adult care, counseling for women and girls living with epilepsy, referral for specialty care, and prevention and treatment of seizure clusters and status epilepticus. RESULTS It is feasible to adopt a learning healthcare system framework in epilepsy centers and community services organizations. Through structured collaboration between epilepsy care providers, community support organizations, PWE, and their families/caregivers we have identified new opportunities to improve outcomes that are not available in traditional care models.
Collapse
|
11
|
Steels S, Ainsworth J, van Staa TP. Implementation of a "real-world" learning health system: Results from the evaluation of the Connected Health Cities programme. Learn Health Syst 2021; 5:e10224. [PMID: 33889733 PMCID: PMC8051340 DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Revised: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The "learning health system" has been proposed to deliver better outcomes for patients and communities by analyzing routinely captured health information and feeding back results to clinical staff. This approach has been piloted in the Connected Health Cities (CHC) programme in four regions in the North of England. This paper presents the results of the evaluation of this program conducted between February and December 2018. METHODS Fifty nine semistructured interviews were completed with a mix of CHC programme staff and external partners who had contributed to the delivery of the CHC programme. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. This also included the review of project documentation including project reports and minutes of project group meetings, in addition to a short online survey that was completed by 31 members of CHC programme staff. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS Two overarching themes emerged through the thematic analysis of participant interview: (a) challenges in the implementation of learning health system pathways, and (b) benefits to the CHC approach for both staff and patients. In particular, time constraints in delivering an ambitious program of work, data quality, and accessibility, as well as the long-term sustainability of the CHC programme were noted as key challenges in implementing a LHS at scale. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this evaluation provide valuable insight into creating learning health system at scale, including the potential benefits and likely challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Steels
- Health e‐Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
- Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social CareManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK
| | - John Ainsworth
- Health e‐Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Tjeerd P. van Staa
- Health e‐Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
- Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical SciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Change in environmental barriers experienced over a 5-year period by people living with spinal cord injury in Switzerland: a prospective cohort study. Spinal Cord 2020; 59:441-451. [PMID: 33230271 DOI: 10.1038/s41393-020-00580-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Cohort study with two measurement occasions. OBJECTIVES To investigate change in environmental barriers experienced by people living with spinal cord injury (SCI) over a 5-year period. SETTING Community, Switzerland. METHODS Data were from the Swiss spinal cord injury (SwiSCI) survey. Main outcome measure was the Nottwil Environmental Factors Inventory-Short Form. Random-effects Poisson regression featuring between-within estimation was used to examine predictors of the number of environmental barriers and of its change over time. RESULTS One thousand five hundred and forty-nine persons participated in Survey 2012 and 1530 participated in Survey 2017; 761 participated in both surveys. In both surveys most participants reported at least three barriers. Leading issues were unfavorable climate, inaccessibility of buildings and public spaces, and lack of or insufficiently adapted means of transportation. Reporting of barriers related to climate, finances, and state services declined over time. Between subjects, having more health problems, lesser physical independence, poorer mental health, and a lower household income were related to a higher number of barriers experienced. Within subjects, improvements in income, physical independence, and mental health over time were related to a reduction in barriers. CONCLUSIONS Inaccessibility of buildings and places and problems with transportation remained major barriers over a 5-year period and should be priorities of Swiss disability policy. People with reduced mental and physical health, and those with lower income are vulnerable groups deserving specific attention. Policies targeting income and life-long rehabilitation targeting health promotion and maintenance may be suitable means to reduce the experience of environmental barriers.
Collapse
|
13
|
Bickenbach J, Batistella L, Gutenbrunner C, Middleton J, Post MW, Stucki G. The International Spinal Cord Injury Survey: The Way Forward. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2020; 101:2227-2232. [PMID: 32663478 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
As a community survey of individuals living with spinal cord injury in 22 countries, representing all 6 of the World Health Organization regions, the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) community survey is one of the few surveys that highlights not only basic medical issues, but also the impact of spinal cord injury (SCI) on the everyday lives of people. The InSCI survey is part of a much larger project known as the Learning Health System for SCI Initiative (LHS-SCI). The objective of this article is to highlight some of the ongoing and planned next steps at the national and international levels. The implementation phase of the LHS-SCI initiative, beginning with the publication of primary results and extending until 2023, will use the results of the InSCI survey as evidence for implementation of recommendations for improving the societal response to the needs of individuals with SCI at the national level. To illustrate the variety of implementation activities currently underway, we provide country examples from Australia, Morocco, Malaysia, and Germany to demonstrate the diversity of approaches to the implementation of InSCI data. The implementation phase of the LHS-SCI initiative promises to usher in a new era of SCI research that will be seamlessly linked to ongoing and effective implementation actions, at both international and national levels and across settings from clinical practice, health systems management, and national policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome Bickenbach
- Swiss Paraplegic Research, Guido A. Zäch Institute, Nottwil, Switzerland; Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
| | | | | | - James Middleton
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Sydney Medical School, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Marcel W Post
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, Groningen, The Netherlands; Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center, Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gerold Stucki
- Swiss Paraplegic Research, Guido A. Zäch Institute, Nottwil, Switzerland; Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Martani A, Geneviève LD, Pauli-Magnus C, McLennan S, Elger BS. Regulating the Secondary Use of Data for Research: Arguments Against Genetic Exceptionalism. Front Genet 2019; 10:1254. [PMID: 31956328 PMCID: PMC6951399 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
As accessing, collecting, and storing personal information become increasingly easier, the secondary use of data has the potential to make healthcare research more cost and time effective. The widespread reuse of data, however, raises important ethical and policy issues, especially because of the sensitive nature of genetic and health-related information. Regulation is thus crucial to determine the conditions upon which data can be reused. In this respect, the question emerges whether it is appropriate to endorse genetic exceptionalism and grant genetic data an exceptional status with respect to secondary use requirements. Using Swiss law as a case study, it is argued that genetic exceptionalism in secondary use regulation is not justified for three reasons. First, although genetic data have particular features, also other non-genetic data can be extremely sensitive. Second, having different regulatory requirements depending on the nature of data hinders the creation of comprehensible consent forms. Third, empirical evidence about public preferences concerning data reuse suggests that exceptional protection for genetic data alone is not justified. In this sense, it is claimed that regulation concerning data reuse should treat genetic data as important, but not exceptional.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Martani
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Christiane Pauli-Magnus
- Department of Clinical Research, University and University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stuart McLennan
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernice Simone Elger
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University Center of Legal Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|