Longterm outcomes of stent placement for hepatic venous outflow obstruction in adult liver transplantation recipients

Metallic Stents for Hepatic Venous Outflow Obstruction After Living-Donor Liver Transplantation and their Therapeutic Effects

BACKGROUND

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is established as a standard therapy for end-stage liver disease; however, vessel reconstruction is more demanding due to the short length and small size of the available structures compared with deceased-donor whole liver transplantation. Interventional radiology (IR) has become the first-line treatment for vascular complications after LDLT. Hepatic venous outflow obstruction (HVOO) is a life-threatening complication after LDLT. The aim of this study of 592 adult-to-adult LDLT cases was to investigate the safety and efficacy of stent implantation for HVOO after LDLT.

METHODS

Records of patients who developed HVOO requiring any treatment were collected with special reference to the metallic stent implantation. There were 232 left-side grafts and 360 right-side grafts. Sixteen cases developed HVOO after LDLT with an incidence rate of 2.7%, 5 with a left liver graft (2%), and 11 with a right-side graft (3%). The IR was attempted for 14 cases; among those, 8 cases were treated by stent implantation.

RESULTS

The technical success rate of the initial stent implantation was 100%. The pressure gradient at the stenotic site significantly improved from 12.2 (range, 10.9-20.4 cm H2O) to 3.9 cm H2O (range, 1.4-8.2 cm H2O; P = .03). The volume of the congested graft liver decreased significantly from 1448 (range, 788-2170 mL) to 1265 mL (range, 748-1665 mL; P = .01), and the serum albumin level improved significantly from 3.3 (range, 1.7-3.7 g/dL) to 3.7 g/dL (range, 2.9-4.1 g/dL; P = .02). No procedure-related complication was noted, and the long-term stent patency was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Metallic stent implantation for stenotic venous anastomosis after LDLT is a safe and effective treatment.

Endovascular Treatment of Venous Outflow and Portal Venous Complications After Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation continues to rapidly evolve, and in 2020, 8906 orthotopic liver transplants were performed in the United States. As a technically complex surgery with multiple vascular anastomoses, stenosis and thrombosis of the venous anastomoses are among the recognized vascular complications. While rare, venous complications may be challenging to manage and can threaten the graft and the patient. In the last 20 years, endovascular approaches have been increasingly utilized to treat post-transplant venous complications. Herein, the evaluation and interventional treatment of post-transplant venous outflow complications, portal vein stenosis, portal vein thrombosis, and recurrent portal hypertension with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) are reviewed.

Pull-through technique for hepatic vein angioplasty after liver transplantation

Hepatic venous outflow complication is one of the crucial vascular complications after liver transplantation. We describe successful use of the pull-through technique for hepatic vein angioplasty in a patient with stenosis of the middle and left hepatic veins (MHV and LHV) after living-donor liver transplantation. It was difficult to select the stenotic MHV with a femoral approach. However, the guidewire was unexpectedly inserted into a small collateral vein and selective angiography showed the MHV through the collaterals. Because the guidewire proceeded to the MHV via the collateral and finally into the inferior vena cava, we advanced a catheter from the inferior vena cava to the MHV using the pull-through technique and performed balloon angioplasty.

The Application of Interventional Radiology in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

Owing to improvements in surgical techniques and medical care, living-donor liver transplantation has become an established treatment modality in patients with end-stage liver disease. However, various vascular or non-vascular complications may occur during or after transplantation. Herein, we review how interventional radiologic techniques can be used to treat these complications.

The devil is in the detail: current management of perioperative surgical complications after liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite advances in the field, perioperative morbidity is common after liver transplantation. This review examines the current literature to provide up-to-date management of common surgical complications associated with liver transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research focuses on problems with anastomoses of the vena cava, portal vein, hepatic artery, and bile ducts. Interventional endoscopic and radiological techniques are used more frequently to avoid reoperation.

SUMMARY

Advances in the management of perioperative surgical complications have focused on minimally invasive measures that successfully treat technical problems with implantation of liver allografts from both living and deceased donors.

Angioplasty with versus without routine stent placement for Budd-Chiari syndrome: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Angioplasty recanalisation is recommended as the first-line interventional procedure for Budd-Chiari syndrome, but subsequent restenosis is common. We aimed to test whether use of routine, non-selective stenting in angioplasty could improve patency and treatment efficacy with adequate safety in Budd-Chiari syndrome.

METHODS

We did a randomised controlled trial, for which patients aged 18-75 years with Budd-Chiari syndrome with membranous obstruction or short-length stenosis (≤4 cm), and a Child-Pugh score of less than 13 were considered eligible. Patients were excluded if they had obstruction not amenable to angioplasty, were recommended to be treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or liver transplantation, or had contraindications for angioplasty. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to an angioplasty-only group or an angioplasty plus routine stenting group, with use of a web-based allocation system (Pocock and Simon's minimisation method, stratified by obstruction features and Child-Pugh score). Recanalisation procedures were done within 24 h of randomisation. The statistician and investigators responsible for data collection data and endpoint assessment were masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients free of restenosis, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02201485) and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between July 28, 2014, and Sept 29, 2017, 88 (59%) of 150 screened patients were enrolled and assigned either the angioplasty-only group (n=45) or the angioplasty plus routine stenting group (n=43). During a median follow-up period of 27 months (IQR 19-41), the angioplasty plus routine stenting group had significantly higher proportion of patients free of restenosis (42 [98%] of 43 patients) than did the angioplasty-only group (27 [60%] of 45 patients; p<0·0001). In the survival analysis, 3-year restenosis-free survival was 96·0% (95% CI 88·6-100·0) in the routine stenting group versus 60·4% (46·4-78·7) in the angioplasty-only group (log-rank p<0·0001). The hazard ratio for restenosis was 0·04 (95% CI 0·01-0·31) in favour of routine stenting, with an absolute risk reduction of 35·6% (95% CI 24·2-55·0). Two (5%) patients in the angioplasty plus routine stenting group and one (2%) patient in the angioplasty-only group died during follow-up. One (2%) patient from the angioplasty plus routine stenting group had puncture site haematoma, which was not related to stenting. No stent fracture or migration occurred. Anticoagulation-related adverse events occurred in five (11%) patients from angioplasty alone group and five (12%) patients from angioplasty plus routine stenting group.

INTERPRETATION

Routine stenting with angioplasty is superior to angioplasty alone for preventing restenosis in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome with short-length stenosis and is safe to use as part of first-line invasive treatment. Further validation is needed in similar settings and other regions in which different characteristics of Budd-Chiari syndrome are more prevalent.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Technology R&D Programme, Optimised Overall Project of Shaanxi Province, Boost Programme of Xijing Hospital.

Long-term outcomes after stent insertion in patients with early and late hepatic vein outflow obstruction after living donor liver transplantation

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to describe the long-term effects of stenting in patients with hepatic venous outflow obstruction (HVOO), who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Methods

Between January 2000 and December 2009, 622 adult patients underwent LDLT at our hospital, and of these patients, 21 (3.3%) were diagnosed with HVOO; among these patients, 17 underwent stenting. The patients were divided into early or late groups according to the time of their HVOO diagnoses (cutoff: 60 days after liver transplantation).

Results

The median follow-up period was 54.2 months (range, 0.5–192.4 months). Stent insertion was successful in 8 of 10 patients in the early group and 6 of 7 in the late group. The 5-year primary patency rates were 46% and 20%, respectively. In both groups, patients with recurrent HVOO at the beginning showed kinking confirmed by venography. Patients who carried their stents for more than 3 years maintained long-term patency. There was no significant difference in spleen size between groups; however, when the groups were compared according to whether they maintained patency, spleens tended to be smaller in the patency-maintained group.

Conclusion

Unlike stenosis, if kinking is confirmed on venography, stenting is not feasible in the long term for patients with LDLT.

Novel use of percutaneous thrombosuction to rescue the early thrombosis of the conduit vein graft after living donor liver transplantation

A 54-year-old woman with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma received a living donor liver transplant. Thrombosis of the segmental hepatic vein occurred on postoperative day 7. We undertook percutaneous catheter thrombosuction under local anesthesia to extract the thrombus successfully without re-exploration. Thrombosuction has been used for thrombosis of the cardiovascular system, limbs, and brain. We first used it in hepatic venous thrombus after liver transplantation. This procedure is simple, less invasive, feasible, safe, repeatable, and effective.

Balloon dilatation for treatment of hepatic venous outflow obstruction following pediatric liver transplantation

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of balloon dilatation for the treatment of hepatic venous outflow obstruction (HVOO) following pediatric liver transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 246 pediatric patients underwent liver transplantation at our hospital between June 2013 and September 2016. Among these patients, five were ultimately diagnosed with HVOO. Seven procedures (two patients underwent two balloon dilatation procedures) were included in this analysis. The demographic data, types of donor and liver transplant, interventional examination and therapeutic outcomes of these five children were analyzed. The median interval time between pediatric liver transplantation and balloon dilatation procedures was 9.8 mo (range: 1-32).

RESULTS

Five children with HVOO were successfully treated by balloon angioplasty without stent placement, with seven procedures performed for six stenotic lesions. All children underwent successful percutaneous intervention. Among these five patients, four were treated by single balloon angioplasty, and these patients did not develop recurrent stenosis. In seven episodes of balloon angioplasty across the stenosis, the pressure gradient was 12.0 ± 8.8 mmHg before balloon dilatation and 1.1 ± 1.5 mmHg after the procedures, which revealed a statistically significant reduction (P < 0.05). The overall technical success rate among these seven procedures was 100% (7/7), and clinical success was achieved in all five patients (100%). The patients were followed for 4-33 mo (median: 15 mo). No significant procedural complications or procedure-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

Balloon dilatation is an effective and safe therapeutic option for HVOO in children undergoing pediatric liver transplantation. Venous angioplasty is also recommended in cases with recurrent HVOO.

Enlarging vascular stents after pediatric liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Endovascular intervention with stent placement to treat portal vein (PV) and hepatic vein (HV) stenosis after pediatric liver transplantation (LT) is still controversial in small children owing to the potential risk of functional stenosis after growth. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stent placement in this population.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2016, 6 children (all <3 years) received HV (n = 2) and PV (n = 4) stents placement among 46 pediatric LT patients at our institution. The clinical outcome and patency rate were followed. Morphologic changes of stents were assessed from plain films by a new index: the stent diameter ratio (SDR).

RESULTS

The median age of the patients at LT was 8.9 months. The patency rate was 100% without functional stenosis during a median follow-up period of 65.5 months. The "stent growth" phenomenon was demonstrated by SDR with significant resolution of hourglass deformity 2 years after stent placement (p for trend <.001).

CONCLUSION

Vascular stent placement is a safe and effective method for the management of PV and HV stenosis following pediatric LT because these stents will enlarge as children grow.

TYPE OF STUDY

Case Series with no Comparison Group LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.