1
|
Douglas N, Leslie K, Darvall JN. Vasopressors to treat postoperative hypotension after adult noncardiac, non-obstetric surgery: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth 2023; 131:813-822. [PMID: 37778937 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative hypotension is common after major surgery and is associated with patient harm. Vasopressors are commonly used to treat hypotension without clear evidence of benefit. We conducted a systematic review to better understand the use, impact, and rationale for vasopressor administration after noncardiac, non-obstetric surgery in adults. METHODS We conducted a prospectively registered systematic review. Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDBASE, and MEDLINE were searched for RCTs and cohort studies of adult patients receiving vasopressors after noncardiac, non-obstetric surgery. Study quality was critically appraised by two investigators. Findings from the review were synthesised, but formal meta-analysis was not performed because of significant variability in study populations and outcomes. RESULTS A total of 3201 articles were screened, of which seven RCTs, two prospective cohort studies, and 15 retrospective cohort studies were included in the analysis (24 in total). One study was graded as high quality, two as moderate quality, and the remaining 21 as low quality. Sixteen studies relied on clinical assessment alone to decide on therapeutic interventions. Vasodilation was the most common suggested physiological disturbance. The median proportion of patients receiving vasopressors was 42% (interquartile range: 11.5-74.7%). Norepinephrine was the most common vasopressor used. CONCLUSIONS The evidence supporting the use of vasopressors to treat postoperative hypotension is limited. Future research should focus on whether vasodilatation or other physiological disturbance is driving postoperative hypotension to allow rational decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ned Douglas
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Kate Leslie
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jai N Darvall
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hakeem AR, Mathew JS, Aunés CV, Mazzola A, Alconchel F, Yoon YI, Testa G, Selzner N, Sarin SK, Lee KW, Soin A, Pomposelli J, Menon K, Goyal N, Kota V, Abu-Gazala S, Rodriguez-Davalos M, Rajalingam R, Kapoor D, Durand F, Kamath P, Jothimani D, Sudhindran S, Vij V, Yoshizumi T, Egawa H, Lerut J, Broering D, Berenguer M, Cattral M, Clavien PA, Chen CL, Shah S, Zhu ZJ, Ascher N, Bhangui P, Rammohan A, Emond J, Rela M. Preventing Small-for-size Syndrome in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference. Transplantation 2023; 107:2203-2215. [PMID: 37635285 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a well-recognized complication following liver transplantation (LT), with up to 20% developing this following living donor LT (LDLT). Preventing SFSS involves consideration of factors before the surgical procedure, including donor and recipient selection, and factors during the surgical procedure, including adequate outflow reconstruction, graft portal inflow modulation, and management of portosystemic shunts. International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplant Society of India Consensus Conference was convened in January 2023 to develop recommendations for the prediction and management of SFSS in LDLT. The format of the conference was based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. International experts in this field were allocated to 4 working groups (diagnosis, prevention, anesthesia, and critical care considerations, and management of established SFSS). The working groups prepared evidence-based recommendations to answer-specific questions considering the currently available literature. The working group members, independent panel, and conference attendees served as jury to edit and confirm the final recommendations presented at the end of the conference by each working group separately. This report presents the final statements and evidence-based recommendations provided by working group 2 that can be implemented to prevent SFSS in LDLT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Rahman Hakeem
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Johns Shaji Mathew
- Department of GI, HPB & Multi-Organ Transplant, Rajagiri Hospitals, Kochi, India
| | - Carmen Vinaixa Aunés
- Hepatología y Trasplante Hepático, Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alessandra Mazzola
- Sorbonne Université, Unité Médicale de Transplantation Hépatique, Hépato-gastroentérologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Felipe Alconchel
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain
- Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia, IMIB-Pascual Parrilla, Murcia, Spain
| | - Young-In Yoon
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Department of Abdominal Transplantation, Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Nazia Selzner
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Ajmera Transplant Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shiv Kumar Sarin
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Arvinder Soin
- Medanta Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta-The Medicity, Delhi, NCR, India
| | - James Pomposelli
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO
| | - Krishna Menon
- Institute of Liver Diseases, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neerav Goyal
- Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreatobiliary Surgery Unit (LTHPS), Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Venugopal Kota
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Yashoda Hospitals, Secunderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Samir Abu-Gazala
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Manuel Rodriguez-Davalos
- Liver Center, Primary Children's Hospital; Transplant Services, Intermountain Transplant Center, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Rajesh Rajalingam
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| | - Dharmesh Kapoor
- Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Yashoda Hospitals, Secunderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Francois Durand
- Hepatology and Liver Intensive Care, Hospital Beaujon, Clichy University Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Patrick Kamath
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Dinesh Jothimani
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| | - Surendran Sudhindran
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India
| | - Vivek Vij
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fortis Group of Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Hiroto Egawa
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jan Lerut
- Institute for Experimental and Clinical Research (IREC), Université catholique Louvain (UCL), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dieter Broering
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Marina Berenguer
- Liver Unit, Ciberehd, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Universidad Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Mark Cattral
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Ajmera Transplant Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Chao-Long Chen
- Liver Transplantation Centre, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Samir Shah
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver Disease, HPB Surgery and Transplant, Global Hospitals, Mumbai, India
| | - Zhi-Jun Zhu
- Liver Transplantation Center, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Nancy Ascher
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Prashant Bhangui
- Medanta Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta-The Medicity, Delhi, NCR, India
| | - Ashwin Rammohan
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| | - Jean Emond
- Liver and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Mohamed Rela
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kirchner VA, Shankar S, Victor DW, Tanaka T, Goldaracena N, Troisi RI, Olthoff KM, Kim JM, Pomfret EA, Heaton N, Polak WG, Shukla A, Mohanka R, Balci D, Ghobrial M, Gupta S, Maluf D, Fung JJ, Eguchi S, Roberts J, Eghtesad B, Selzner M, Prasad R, Kasahara M, Egawa H, Lerut J, Broering D, Berenguer M, Cattral MS, Clavien PA, Chen CL, Shah SR, Zhu ZJ, Ascher N, Ikegami T, Bhangui P, Rammohan A, Emond JC, Rela M. Management of Established Small-for-size Syndrome in Post Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Medical, Radiological, and Surgical Interventions: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference. Transplantation 2023; 107:2238-2246. [PMID: 37749813 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) following living donor liver transplantation is a complication that can lead to devastating outcomes such as prolonged poor graft function and possibly graft loss. Because of the concern about the syndrome, some transplants of mismatched grafts may not be performed. Portal hyperperfusion of a small graft and hyperdynamic splanchnic circulation are recognized as main pathogenic factors for the syndrome. Management of established SFSS is guided by the severity of the presentation with the initial focus on pharmacological therapy to modulate portal flow and provide supportive care to the patient with the goal of facilitating graft regeneration and recovery. When medical management fails or condition progresses with impending dysfunction or even liver failure, interventional radiology (IR) and/or surgical interventions to reduce portal overperfusion should be considered. Although most patients have good outcomes with medical, IR, and/or surgical management that allow graft regeneration, the risk of graft loss increases dramatically in the setting of bilirubin >10 mg/dL and INR>1.6 on postoperative day 7 or isolated bilirubin >20 mg/dL on postoperative day 14. Retransplantation should be considered based on the overall clinical situation and the above postoperative laboratory parameters. The following recommendations focus on medical and IR/surgical management of SFSS as well as considerations and timing of retransplantation when other therapies fail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varvara A Kirchner
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Sadhana Shankar
- The Liver Unit, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - David W Victor
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Tomohiro Tanaka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Nicolas Goldaracena
- Abdominal Organ Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Division of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Public Health, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Kim M Olthoff
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Elizabeth A Pomfret
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Nigel Heaton
- The Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wojtek G Polak
- The Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Akash Shukla
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Ravi Mohanka
- Institute of Liver Disease, HPB Surgery and Transplant, Global Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deniz Balci
- Department of General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Bahcesehir University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mark Ghobrial
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Subash Gupta
- Max Centre for Liver and Biliary Sciences, Max Saket Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Daniel Maluf
- Program in Transplantation, University of Maryland Medical Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - John J Fung
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine Transplant Institute, Chicago, IL
| | - Susumu Eguchi
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - John Roberts
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Bijan Eghtesad
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Clinical Assistant Professor, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Markus Selzner
- HPB and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Raj Prasad
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Mureo Kasahara
- National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroto Egawa
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jan Lerut
- Institute for Experimental and Clinical Research-Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dieter Broering
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Marina Berenguer
- Liver Unit, CIBERehd, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe-Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Mark S Cattral
- HPB and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Chao-Long Chen
- Liver Transplant Center and Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Samir R Shah
- Institute of Liver Disease, HPB Surgery and Transplant, Global Hospitals, Mumbai, India
| | - Zhi-Jun Zhu
- Liver Transplantation Center, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University; and Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Nancy Ascher
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Toru Ikegami
- Divsion of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Prashant Bhangui
- Medanta Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta-The Medicity, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashwin Rammohan
- The Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Jean C Emond
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Mohamed Rela
- The Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chadha R, Sakai T, Rajakumar A, Shingina A, Yoon U, Patel D, Spiro M, Bhangui P, Sun LY, Humar A, Bezinover D, Findlay J, Saigal S, Singh S, Yi NJ, Rodriguez-Davalos M, Kumar L, Kumaran V, Agarwal S, Berlakovich G, Egawa H, Lerut J, Clemens Broering D, Berenguer M, Cattral M, Clavien PA, Chen CL, Shah S, Zhu ZJ, Ascher N, Bhangui P, Rammohan A, Emond J, Rela M. Anesthesia and Critical Care for the Prediction and Prevention for Small-for-size Syndrome: Guidelines from the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference. Transplantation 2023; 107:2216-2225. [PMID: 37749811 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the perioperative period of living donor liver transplantation, anesthesiologists and intensivists may encounter patients in receipt of small grafts that puts them at risk of developing small for size syndrome (SFSS). METHODS A scientific committee (106 members from 21 countries) performed an extensive literature review on aspects of SFSS with proposed recommendations. Recommendations underwent a blinded review by an independent expert panel and discussion/voting on the recommendations occurred at a consensus conference organized by the International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplantation Society of India. RESULTS It was determined that centers with experience in living donor liver transplantation should utilize potential small for size grafts. Higher risk recipients with sarcopenia, cardiopulmonary, and renal dysfunction should receive small for size grafts with caution. In the intraoperative phase, a restrictive fluid strategy should be considered along with routine use of cardiac output monitoring, as well as use of pharmacologic portal flow modulation when appropriate. Postoperatively, these patients can be considered for enhanced recovery and should receive proactive monitoring for SFSS, nutrition optimization, infection prevention, and consideration for early renal replacement therapy for avoidance of graft congestion. CONCLUSIONS Our recommendations provide a framework for the optimal anesthetic and critical care management in the perioperative period for patients with grafts that put them at risk of developing SFSS. There is a significant limitation in the level of evidence for most recommendations. This statement aims to provide guidance for future research in the perioperative management of SFSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Chadha
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Tetsuro Sakai
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Akila Rajakumar
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| | - Alexandra Shingina
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Uzung Yoon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Dhupal Patel
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Spiro
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Devon and Exeter and Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, The Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pooja Bhangui
- Medanta Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta-The Medicity, Delhi, NCR, India
| | - Li-Ying Sun
- Department of Critical Liver Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Abhinav Humar
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Dmitri Bezinover
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James Findlay
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Sanjiv Saigal
- Centre of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Centre of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Max Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Shweta Singh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Division of HBP Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Manuel Rodriguez-Davalos
- Division of Transplantation and Advanced Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Utah, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Lakshmi Kumar
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amrita Hospital, Kochi, India
| | - Vinay Kumaran
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, VCU Medical Center, Richmond, VA
| | - Shaleen Agarwal
- Centre of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Centre of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Max Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Hiroto Egawa
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jan Lerut
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dieter Clemens Broering
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Marina Berenguer
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatology Unit, La Fe University Hospital and IISLaFe and Ciberehd, Valencia, Spain
| | - Mark Cattral
- Ajmera Transplant Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Chao-Long Chen
- Liver Transplantation Centre, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Samir Shah
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver Disease, HPB Surgery and Transplant, Global Hospitals, Mumbai, India
| | - Zhi-Jun Zhu
- Liver Transplantation Center, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Nancy Ascher
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Prashant Bhangui
- Medanta Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta-The Medicity, Delhi, NCR, India
| | - Ashwin Rammohan
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| | - Jean Emond
- Liver and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Mohamed Rela
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vargas PA, Khanmammadova N, Balci D, Goldaracena N. Technical challenges in LDLT - Overcoming small for size syndrome and venous outflow reconstruction. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2023; 37:100750. [PMID: 36878038 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2023.100750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
Living Donor Liver Transplantation (LDLT) emerged as an alternative treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease waiting for an organ from a deceased donor. In addition to allowing for a faster access to transplantation, LDLT provides improved recipient outcomes when compared to deceased donor LT. However, it represents a more complex and demanding procedure for the transplant surgeon. In addition to a comprehensive preoperative donor assessment and stringent technical considerations during the donor hepatectomy to ensure upmost donor safety, the recipient procedure also comes with intrinsic challenges during LDLT. A proper approach during both procedures will result in favorable donor and recipient's outcomes. Hence, it is critical for the transplant surgeon to know how to overcome such technical challenges and avoid deleterious complications. One of the most feared complications following LDLT is small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). Although, surgical advances and deeper understanding of the pathophysiology behind SFSS has allowed for a safer implementation of LDLT, there is currently no consensus on the best strategy to prevent or manage this complication. Therefore, we aim to review current practices in technically challenging situations during LDLT, with a particular focus on management of small grafts and venous outflow reconstructions, as they possess one of the biggest technical challenges faced during LDLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola A Vargas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | - Deniz Balci
- Bahçeşehir University School of Medicine Medical Park Göztepe Hospital, Liv Ulus Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nicolas Goldaracena
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rammohan A, Rela M, Kim DS, Soejima Y, Kasahara M, Ikegami T, Spiro M, Aristotle Raptis D, Humar A. Does modification of portal pressure and flow enhance recovery of the recipient after living donor liver transplantation? A systematic review of literature and expert panel recommendations. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14657. [PMID: 35344628 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Portal inflow modulation (PIM) aimed at reducing portal hyperperfusion is commonly used in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to reduce the risk of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). Many different techniques, both pharmacological and surgical have been used for this purpose. There is, however, little consensus on the best method of PIM, its exact role in preventing SFSS and on early post-LDLT recovery. OBJECTIVES To identify whether modifications of portal pressures and flows enhance recovery after LDLT and to provide international expert panel recommendations. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central. METHODS Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. PROSPERO ID CRD42021260997. RESULTS Five hundred and ninety four articles were identified through databases' search. Of the 24 included for a final review by the working group (WG), there were five randomized control trials, four prospective studies and 15 retrospective series. Six outcome measures which were likely to influence early recovery after LDLT, especially in small-for-size grafts (SFSG) were shortlisted. These included acute kidney injury, SFSS, morbidity including sepsis, length of ICU and hospital stay, morbidity of the PIM technique and overall mortality. The WG noted that PIM in this subset of LDLT recipients had a beneficial effect on all the outcomes measures. CONCLUSIONS Considering all decision domains, the panel recommends pre- and intraoperative actual graft weight validation, portal pressure/flow measurements, and a comprehensive donor evaluation for the determination of potentially small-for-size/ small-for-flow grafts as mandatory. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) Pharmacological PIM helps improve early renal function in LDLT recipients. (Quality of Evidence: High | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In selected patients with SFSG, PIM helps reduce SFSS/EAD and sepsis. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) PIM in the form of splenectomy has increased morbidity compared to splenic artery ligation (SAL). (Quality of Evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In LDLT recipients with SFSG, PIM may help reduce morbidity/mortality. (Quality of Evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In LDLT recipients with SFSG, modification of portal pressures and flows enhances recovery after LDLT. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin Rammohan
- Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai, India
| | - Mohamed Rela
- Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai, India
| | - Dong-Sik Kim
- Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yuji Soejima
- Department of Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Mureo Kasahara
- Organ Transplantation Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toru Ikegami
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Michael Spiro
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.,Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Dimitri Aristotle Raptis
- Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.,Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Abhinav Humar
- Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute (STI), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Qi X, Bai Z, Zhu Q, Cheng G, Chen Y, Dang X, Ding H, Han J, Han L, He Y, Ji F, Jin H, Li B, Li H, Li Y, Li Z, Liu B, Liu F, Liu L, Lin S, Ma D, Meng F, Qi R, Ren T, Shao L, Tang S, Tang Y, Teng Y, Wang C, Wang R, Wu Y, Xu X, Yang L, Yuan J, Yuan S, Yang Y, Zhao Q, Zhang W, Yang Y, Guo X, Xie W. Practice guidance for the use of terlipressin for liver cirrhosis-related complications. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2022; 15:17562848221098253. [PMID: 35601800 PMCID: PMC9121451 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221098253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Liver cirrhosis is a major global health burden worldwide due to its high risk of morbidity and mortality. Role of terlipressin for the management of liver cirrhosis-related complications has been recognized during recent years. This article aims to develop evidence-based clinical practice guidance on the use of terlipressin for liver cirrhosis-related complications. Methods Hepatobiliary Study Group of the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology of the Chinese Medical Association and Hepatology Committee of the Chinese Research Hospital Association have invited gastroenterologists, hepatologists, infectious disease specialists, surgeons, and clinical pharmacists to formulate the clinical practice guidance based on comprehensive literature review and experts' clinical experiences. Results Overall, 10 major guidance statements regarding efficacy and safety of terlipressin in liver cirrhosis were proposed. Terlipressin can be beneficial for the management of cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). However, the evidence regarding the use of terlipressin in cirrhotic patients with ascites, post-paracentesis circulatory dysfunction, and bacterial infections and in those undergoing hepatic resection and liver transplantation remains insufficient. Terlipressin-related adverse events, mainly including gastrointestinal symptoms, electrolyte disturbance, and cardiovascular and respiratory adverse events, should be closely monitored. Conclusion The current clinical practice guidance supports the use of terlipressin for gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and HRS in liver cirrhosis. High-quality studies are needed to further clarify its potential effects in other liver cirrhosis-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingshun Qi
- Department of Gastroenterology, General
Hospital of Northern Theater Command, 83 Wenhua Road, Shenyang 110015,
Liaoning, China
| | - Zhaohui Bai
- Department of Gastroenterology, General
Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
- Department of Life Sciences and
Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Qiang Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shandong
Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan,
China
| | - Gang Cheng
- Department of Life Sciences and
Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yu Chen
- Difficult and Complicated Liver Diseases and
Artificial Liver Center, Beijing You’an Hospital, Capital Medical
University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaowei Dang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic
Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou,
China
| | - Huiguo Ding
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatology,
Beijing You’An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Juqiang Han
- Institute of Liver Disease, The 7th Medical
Centre of Chinese People Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing,
China
| | - Lei Han
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, General
Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Yingli He
- Department of Infectious Diseases, First
Affiliated Teaching Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| | - Fanpu Ji
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second
Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| | - Hongxu Jin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, General
Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Bimin Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First
Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Hongyu Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, General
Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Yiling Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, First
Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Zhiwei Li
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Shenzhen
Third People’s Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Bang Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Disease, 900
Hospital of the Joint Logistics Team, Fuzhou, China
| | - Fuquan Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology,
Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tangdu
Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Su Lin
- Liver Research Center, The First Affiliated
Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Dapeng Ma
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The
Sixth People’s Hospital of Dalian, Dalian, China
| | - Fanping Meng
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Fifth
Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ruizhao Qi
- Department of General Surgery, The Fifth
Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tianshu Ren
- Department of Pharmacy, General Hospital of
Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Lichun Shao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Air Force
Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Shanhong Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology, General
Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, China
| | - Yufu Tang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, General
Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Yue Teng
- Department of Emergency Medicine, General
Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Chunhui Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, General
Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Ran Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, General
Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Yunhai Wu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sixth
People’s Hospital of Shenyang, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiangbo Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, General
Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
- Department of Life Sciences and
Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ling Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union
Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and
Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jinqiu Yuan
- Clinical Research Center, The Seventh
Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Shanshan Yuan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Xi’an Central
Hospital, Xi’an, China
| | - Yida Yang
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis
and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital,
Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qingchun Zhao
- Department of Pharmacy, General Hospital of
Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, General
Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Yongping Yang
- Department of Liver Disease, The Fifth Medical
Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, 100 West Fourth Ring Middle Road,
Beijing 100039, China
| | - Xiaozhong Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, General
Hospital of Northern Theater Command, 83 Wenhua Road, Shenyang 110015,
Liaoning, China
| | - Weifen Xie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changzheng
Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sakai T, Ko JS, Crouch CE, Kumar S, Little MB, Chae MS, Ganoza A, Gómez-Salinas L, Humar A, Kim SH, Koo BN, Rodriguez G, Sirianni J, Smith NK, Song JG, Ullah A, Hendrickse A. Perioperative management of adult living donor liver transplantation: Part 1 - recipients. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14667. [PMID: 35435293 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Living donor liver transplantation was first developed to mitigate the limited access to deceased donor organs in Asia in the 1990s. This alternative liver transplantation option has become an established and widely practiced transplantation method for adult patients suffering from end-stage liver disease. It has successfully addressed the shortage of deceased donors. The Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia and the Korean Society of Transplant Anesthesia jointly reviewed published studies on the perioperative management of live donor liver transplant recipients. The review aims to offer transplant anesthesiologists and critical care physicians a comprehensive overview of the perioperative management of adult live liver transplantation recipients. We feature the status, outcomes, surgical procedure, portal venous decompression, anesthetic management, prevention of acute kidney injury, avoidance of blood transfusion, monitoring and therapeutic strategies of hemodynamic derangements, and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for liver transplant recipients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuro Sakai
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Justin Sangwook Ko
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cara E Crouch
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sathish Kumar
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michael B Little
- Department of Anesthesiology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Min Suk Chae
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Armando Ganoza
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Luis Gómez-Salinas
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Abhi Humar
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sang Hyun Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Bon-Nyeo Koo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gonzalo Rodriguez
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Joel Sirianni
- Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Natalie K Smith
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Jun-Gol Song
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Aisha Ullah
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Adrian Hendrickse
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Papamichail M, Pizanias M, Heaton ND, M P, M P, Nd H. Minimizing the risk of small-for-size syndrome after liver surgery. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2022; 21:113-133. [PMID: 34961675 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary and secondary liver tumors are not always amenable to resection due to location and size. Inadequate future liver remnant (FLR) may prevent patients from having a curative resection or may result in increased postoperative morbidity and mortality from complications related to small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). DATA SOURCES This comprehensive review analyzed the principles, mechanism and risk factors associated with SFSS and presented current available options in the evaluation of FLR when planning liver surgery. In addition, it provided a detailed description of specific modalities that can be used before, during or after surgery, in order to optimize the conditions for a safe resection and minimize the risk of SFSS. RESULTS Several methods which aim to reduce tumor burden, preserve healthy liver parenchyma, induce hypertrophy of FLR or prevent postoperative complications help minimize the risk of SFSS. CONCLUSIONS With those techniques the indications of radical treatment for patients with liver tumors have significantly expanded. The successful outcome depends on appropriate patient selection, the individualization and modification of interventions and the right timing of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail Papamichail
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK.
| | - Michail Pizanias
- Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK
| | - Nigel D Heaton
- Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Papamichail M
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK; Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK; Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Pizanias M
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK; Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK; Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Heaton Nd
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK; Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK; Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gavriilidis P, Hidalgo E, Sutcliffe RP, Roberts KJ. Terlipressin versus placebo in living donor liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2022; 21:76-79. [PMID: 33637454 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Paschalis Gavriilidis
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.
| | - Ernest Hidalgo
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery and Transplantation, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona 08035, Spain
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Azoulay D, Feray C, Lim C, Salloum C, Conticchio M, Cherqui D, Sa Cunha A, Adam R, Vibert E, Samuel D, Allard MA, Golse N. A systematic review of auxiliary liver transplantation of small for size grafts in patients with chronic liver disease. JHEP Rep 2022; 4:100447. [PMID: 35310820 PMCID: PMC8927838 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims The shortage of liver grafts continues to worsen. Because the expanded use of small-for-size grafts (SFSGs) would substantially alleviate this shortage, we aimed to analyse the available knowledge on auxiliary liver transplantation (ALT) with SFSGs in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) to identify opportunities to develop ALT with SFSGs in patients with CLD. Methods This is a systematic review on ALT using SFSGs in patients with CLD. The review was completed by updates obtained from the authors of the retained reports. Results Heterotopic ALT was performed in 26 cases between 1980 and 2017, none for SFGS stricto sensu, and auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) in 27 cases (from 1999 to 2021), all for SFSG. In APOLT cases, partial native liver resection was performed in most of cases, whereas the second-stage remnant native liver hepatectomy was performed in 9 cases only. The median graft-to-body weight ratio was 0.55, requiring perioperative or intraoperative portal modulation in 16 cases. At least 1 complication occurred in 24 patients following the transplant procedure (morbidity rate, 89%). Four patients (4/27, 15%) died after the APOLT procedure. At the long term, 19 (70%) patients were alive and well at 13 months to 24 years (median, 4.5 years) including 18 with the APOLT graft in place and 1 following retransplantation. Conclusions Despite high postoperative morbidity, and highly reported technical variability, the APOLT technique is a promising technique to use SFSGs in patients with CLD, achieving satisfactory long-term results. The results need to be confirmed on a larger scale, and a standardised technique could lead to even better results. Lay summary At the cost of a high postoperative morbidity, the long-term results of APOLT for small-for-size grafts are good. Standardisation of the procedure and of portal modulation remain needed. Using a small-for-size graft is a risk factor of small-for-size syndrome. Auxiliary liver transplantation can be orthotopic or heterotopic. In auxiliary transplantation, the remnant native liver prevents small-for-size syndrome. Transplantation with a small-for-size graft requires individually tailored portal modulation. Auxiliary liver transplantation might substantially increase the number of available grafts.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kulkarni AV, Kumar K, Candia R, Arab JP, Tevethia HV, Premkumar M, Sharma M, Menon B, Rao GV, Reddy ND, Rao NP. Prophylactic Perioperative Terlipressin Therapy for Preventing Acute Kidney Injury in Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2022; 12:417-427. [PMID: 35535072 PMCID: PMC9077193 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2021.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in the perioperative transplant period and is associated with poor outcomes. Few studies reported a reduction in AKI incidence with terlipressin therapy by counteracting the hemodynamic alterations occurring during liver transplantation. However, the effect of terlipressin on posttransplant outcomes has not been systematically reviewed. Methods A comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed. Studies reporting the use of terlipressin in the perioperative period of living donor liver transplantation were included. We expressed the dichotomous outcomes as risk ratio (RR, 95% confidence interval [CI]) using the random effects model. The primary aim was to assess the posttransplant risk of AKI. The secondary aims were to assess the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), vasopressors, effect on hemodynamics, blood loss during surgery, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and in-hospital mortality. Results A total of nine studies reporting 711 patients (309 patients in the terlipressin group and 402 in the control group) were included for analysis. Terlipressin was administered for a mean duration of 53.44 ± 28.61 h postsurgery. The risk of AKI was lower with terlipressin (0.6 [95% CI, 0.44-0.8]; P = 0.001). However, on sensitivity analysis including only four randomized controlled trials (I2 = 0; P = 0.54), the risk of AKI was similar in both the groups (0.7 [0.43-1.09]; P = 0.11). The need for RRT was similar in both the groups (0.75 [0.35-1.56]; P = 0.44). Terlipressin therapy reduced the need for another vasopressor (0.34 [0.25-0.47]; P < 0.001) with a concomitant rise in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance by 3.2 mm Hg (1.64-4.7; P < 0.001) and 77.64 dyne cm-1.sec-5 (21.27-134; P = 0.007), respectively. Blood loss, duration of hospital/ICU stay, and mortality were similar in both groups. Conclusions Perioperative terlipressin therapy has no clinically relevant benefit.
Collapse
Key Words
- AKI, acute kidney injury
- BMI, body mass index
- BUN, blood urea nitrogen
- C, control
- CI, confidence interval
- CNI, calcineurin inhibitors
- CTP, Child-Turcotte-Pugh score
- DDLT, deceased donor liver transplantation
- GRWR, graft-torecipient weight ratio
- HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
- HCV, hepatitis C virus
- HRS, hepatorenal syndrome
- ICU, intensive care unit
- LDLT, living donor liver transplantation
- MAP, mean arterial pressure
- MELD, model for end-stage liver disease
- NR, not reported
- PRBC, packed red blood cells
- RCT, randomized controlled trial
- RRT, renal replacement therapy
- SD, standard deviation
- SVR, systemic vascular resistance
- Tp, Terlipressin
- acute kidney injury
- hemodynamics
- mTORi, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors
- portal hypertension
- renal replacement therapy
- sCr, serum creatinine
- vasoconstrictors
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand V. Kulkarni
- Department of Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India,Address for correspondence. Dr. Anand V.Kulkarni, Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
| | - Karan Kumar
- Department of Hepatology, Pacific Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, India
| | - Roberto Candia
- Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Juan P. Arab
- Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Harsh V. Tevethia
- Department of Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | | | - Mithun Sharma
- Department of Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Balachandandran Menon
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Guduru V. Rao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Nageshwar D Reddy
- Department of Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Nagaraja P. Rao
- Department of Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bezinover D, Mukhtar A, Wagener G, Wray C, Blasi A, Kronish K, Zerillo J, Tomescu D, Pustavoitau A, Gitman M, Singh A, Saner FH. Hemodynamic Instability During Liver Transplantation in Patients With End-stage Liver Disease: A Consensus Document from ILTS, LICAGE, and SATA. Transplantation 2021; 105:2184-2200. [PMID: 33534523 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Hemodynamic instability (HDI) during liver transplantation (LT) can be difficult to manage and increases postoperative morbidity and mortality. In addition to surgical causes of HDI, patient- and graft-related factors are also important. Nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatation is a common denominator associated with end-stage liver disease related to HDI. Despite intense investigation, optimal management strategies remain elusive. In this consensus article, experts from the International Liver Transplantation Society, the Liver Intensive Care Group of Europe, and the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia performed a rigorous review of the most current literature regarding the epidemiology, causes, and management of HDI during LT. Special attention has been paid to unique LT-associated conditions including the causes and management of vasoplegic syndrome, cardiomyopathies, LT-related arrhythmias, right and left ventricular dysfunction, and the specifics of medical and fluid management in end-stage liver disease as well as problems specifically related to portal circulation. When possible, management recommendations are made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitri Bezinover
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Health, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA. Represents ILTS and LICAGE
| | - Ahmed Mukhtar
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Cairo University, Almanyal, Cairo, Egypt. Represents LICAGE
| | - Gebhard Wagener
- Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY. Represents SATA and ILTS
| | - Christopher Wray
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Ronald Reagan Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. Represents SATA
| | - Annabel Blasi
- Department of Anesthesia, IDIBAPS (Institut d´investigació biomèdica Agustí Pi i Sunyé) Hospital Clinic, Villaroel, Barcelona, Spain. Represents LICAGE and ILTS
| | - Kate Kronish
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Represents SATA
| | - Jeron Zerillo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY. Represents SATA and ILTS
| | - Dana Tomescu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania. Represents LICAGE
| | - Aliaksei Pustavoitau
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Represents ILTS
| | - Marina Gitman
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois Hospital, Chicago, IL. Represents SATA and ILTS
| | - Anil Singh
- Department of Liver Transplant and GI Critical Care, Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital, Cirgaon, Mumbai, India. Represents ILTS
| | - Fuat H Saner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Essen University Medical Center, Essen, Germany. Represents LICAGE
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kulkarni AV, Arab JP, Premkumar M, Benítez C, Tirumalige Ravikumar S, Kumar P, Sharma M, Reddy DN, Simonetto DA, Rao PN. Terlipressin has stood the test of time: Clinical overview in 2020 and future perspectives. Liver Int 2020; 40:2888-2905. [PMID: 33065772 DOI: 10.1111/liv.14703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
Vasoactive drugs form the mainstay of therapy for two of the most important complications of liver disease: hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and acute variceal bleed (AVB). With cumulative evidence supporting the use in cirrhosis, terlipressin has been recommended for the management of HRS and AVB. However, owing to the safety concerns, terlipressin was not approved by food and drug administration (FDA) until now. In this review, we discuss the pharmacology and the major practice-changing studies on the safety and efficacy of terlipressin in patients with cirrhosis particularly focusing on existing indications like AVB and HRS and reviewing new data on the expanding indications in liver disease. The references for this review were identified from PUBMED with MeSH terms such as "terlipressin," "hepatorenal syndrome," "varices, esophagal and gastric," "ascites" and "cirrhosis." Terlipressin, a synthetic analogue of vasopressin, was introduced in 1975 to overcome the adverse effects of vasopressin. Terlipressin is an effective drug for HRS reversal in patients with liver cirrhosis and acute-on-chronic liver failure. There is documented mortality benefit with terlipressin therapy in HRS and AVB. Adverse effects are common with terlipressin and need to be monitored strictly. There is some evidence to support the use of this drug in refractory ascites, hepatic hydrothorax, paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction and perioperatively during liver transplantation. However, terlipressin is not yet recommended for such indications. In conclusion, terlipressin has stood the test of time with expanding indications and clear prerequisites for clinical use. Our review warrants a fresh perspective on the efficacy and safety of terlipressin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand V Kulkarni
- Department of Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Juan Pablo Arab
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Carlos Benítez
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Pramod Kumar
- Department of Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Mithun Sharma
- Department of Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | | | - Douglas A Simonetto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Padaki Nagaraja Rao
- Department of Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rey R. M, Delgado AF, De Zubiria A, Pinto R, De la Hoz-Valle JA, Pérez-Riveros ED, Ardila G, Sierra-Arango F. Prevalence and short-term outcome of hepatorenal syndrome: A 9-year experience in a high-complexity hospital in Colombia. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0239834. [PMID: 33079947 PMCID: PMC7575105 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Hepatorenal syndrome is a rare entity that is part of the complications of liver cirrhosis in its more severe stages. Without treatment, its mortality rate increases significantly. Terlipressin is considered to be the therapy of choice until the need of a liver transplant. The aim is to determine its prevalence, define patients' characteristics, triggers and 90-day survival, according to the type of managements established. METHOD This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in Colombia. It included patients with cirrhosis and acute kidney injury who met hepatorenal syndrome criteria, reaching 28 patients from 2007 to 2015. Groups were categorized according the type of hepatorenal syndrome and treatment. Demographic and trigger factors were evaluated to characterize the population. Treatment outcomes with terlipressin vs norepinephrine were analyzed up to a 90-day survival, using log Rank test. Continuous variables needed Student's T and Mann Whitney's U tests and categorical variables, Chi2 test. A value of p <0.05 and a power of 85% was considered. The data was analyzed in the SPSS version 23 software. RESULTS 117 patients with cirrhosis developed renal injury; of these 23.9% were diagnosed with Hepatorenal Syndrome (67.8% type1; 32.1% type2). The presence of ascites was 100% in HRS2 and 84% in HRS1 (p = 0.296). The main trigger in both types was paracentesis greater than 5 liters in the last 4 weeks (39.3%). In total, 35% of the patients received renal replacement therapy and 14% underwent a hepatic transplant. Type 1 was more frequent (63% received terlipressin; 21% norepinephrine). The total complete response was 36% (Type2 66.6% vs. Type1 18.7%) (p = 0.026). In contrast, the overall mortality was of 67.8% at 90-day of follow-up (89.4% Type1 vs. 22% Type2) (p = <0.001). We found a lower mortality rate in patients treated with terlipressin than treated with norepinephrine (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION There is scarce clinical and epidemiological information about this condition in Colombia. A significant difference between the two drugs cannot be stipulated due to the limitation in the sample size of our study. The general mortality at a 90-day follow-up was high, being higher in patients with HRS1. While the results of this study are suggestive of clinical information for HRS patients in the Colombian population, they should also be interpreted with caution, therefore further multicenter studies should be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margarita Rey R.
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Section, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
- Internal Medicine Department, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
- School of Medicine, Universidad de Los Andes, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
- * E-mail:
| | - Andrés F. Delgado
- Internal Medicine Department, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
- Transplant Service Department, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Alejandra De Zubiria
- Internal Medicine Department, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
- School of Medicine, Universidad de Los Andes, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Renzo Pinto
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Section, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
- Internal Medicine Department, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
- School of Medicine, Universidad de Los Andes, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
| | - José A. De la Hoz-Valle
- Clinical Studies and Clinical Epidemiology Division, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Erika D. Pérez-Riveros
- Clinical Studies and Clinical Epidemiology Division, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Gerardo Ardila
- Clinical Studies and Clinical Epidemiology Division, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Fernando Sierra-Arango
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Section, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
- Internal Medicine Department, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
- School of Medicine, Universidad de Los Andes, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
- Clinical Studies and Clinical Epidemiology Division, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chen JL, Chen YL, Qi B, Pan ZY, Lu YF, Zhang W, Zhu J, Yu WF, Song JC, Lu YG. Impact of Intraoperative Norepinephrine Support on Living Donor Liver Transplantation Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 430 Children. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:1254. [PMID: 32922292 PMCID: PMC7456957 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Norepinephrine (NE) is often administered during the perioperative period of liver transplantation to address hemodynamic instability and to improve organ perfusion and oxygen supply. However, its role and safety profile have yet to be evaluated in pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We hypothesized that intraoperative NE infusion might affect pediatric LDLT outcomes. A retrospective study of 430 pediatric patients (median [interquartile range] age, 7 [6.10] months; 189 [43.9%] female) receiving LDLT between 2014 and 2016 at Renji Hospital was conducted. We evaluated patient survival among recipients who received intraoperative NE infusion (NE group, 85 recipients) and those that did not (non-NE group, 345 recipients). The number of children aged over 24 months and weighing more than 10 kg in NE group was more than that in non-NE group. And children in NE group had longer operative time, longer anhepatic phase time and more fluid infusion. After multivariate regression analysis and propensity score regression adjusting for confounding factors to determine the influence of intraoperative NE infusion on patient survival, the NE group had a 169% more probability of dying. Although there was no difference in mean arterial pressure changes relative to the baseline between the two groups, we did observe increased heart rates in NE group compared with those of the non-NE group at anhepatic phase (P=0.025), neohepatic phase (P=0.012) and operation end phase (P=0.017) of the operation. In conclusion, intraoperative NE infusion was associated with a poorer prognosis for pediatric LDLT recipients. Therefore, we recommend the application of NE during pediatric LDLT should be carefully re-considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiang-Long Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Department of General Surgery, Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuan-Li Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Bo Qi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi-Ying Pan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ye-Feng Lu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiao Zhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgical Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei-Feng Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jin-Chao Song
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shidong Hospital of Shanghai, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu-Gang Lu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Department of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Comment on “Somatostatin as Inflow Modulator in Liver-transplant Recipients With Severe Portal Hypertension—A Randomized Trial”. Ann Surg 2020; 271:e121-e122. [DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
18
|
Mahdy MM, Abbas MS, Kamel EZ, Mostafa MF, Herdan R, Hassan SA, Hassan R, Taha AM, Ibraheem TM, Fadel BA, Geddawy M, Sayed JA, Ibraheim OA. Effects of terlipressin infusion during hepatobiliary surgery on systemic and splanchnic haemodynamics, renal function and blood loss: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2019; 19:106. [PMID: 31200638 PMCID: PMC6570915 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-019-0779-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2018] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Terlipressin, in general, is a vasopressor which acts via V1 receptors. Its infusion elevates mean blood pressure and can reduce bleeding which has a splanchnic origin. The primary outcome was to assess the impact of intraoperative terlipressin infusion on portal venous pressure during hepatobiliary surgery; the 2ry outcomes included effects upon systemic hemodynamics, estimated blood loss, and postoperative renal functions. Methods This prospective randomized study involved 50 patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery who were randomly and equally allocated into terlipressin group, or a control group. The terlipressin group received an initial bolus dose of (1 mg over 30 min) followed by a continuous infusion of 2 μg/kg/h throughout the procedure and gradually weaned over the first four postoperative hours, whereas the control group received the same volumes of normal saline. The portal venous pressure changes were measured directly through a portal vein angiocatheter. Results Portal pressure was significantly reduced over time in the terlipressin group only (from 17.88 ± 7.32 to 15.96 ± 6.55 mmHg, p < .001). Mean arterial blood pressure was significantly higher in the terlipressin group. Estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the control group than the terlipressin group (1065.7 ± 202 versus 842 ± 145.5 ml; p = 0.004), and the units of packed RBCs transfused were significantly higher in the control group ((0–2) versus (0–4) p = 0.003). There was no significant difference between groups as regards the incidence of acute kidney injury. Conclusion Intraoperative infusion of terlipressin during hepatobiliary surgery was shown to improve intraoperative portal hemodynamics with subsequent reduction in blood loss. Trial registration Clinical trial number and registry URL: Trial registration number: NCT02718599. Name of registry: ClinicalTrials.gov. URL of registry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02718599. Date of registration: March 2016. Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: April 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdy Mohammed Mahdy
- Anesthesia and intensive care medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71515, Egypt
| | - Mostafa Samy Abbas
- Anesthesia and intensive care medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71515, Egypt.
| | - Emad Zarief Kamel
- Anesthesia and intensive care medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71515, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Fathy Mostafa
- Anesthesia and intensive care medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71515, Egypt
| | - Ragaa Herdan
- Anesthesia and intensive care medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71515, Egypt
| | - Shimaa Abbas Hassan
- Anesthesia and intensive care medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71515, Egypt
| | - Ramy Hassan
- Hepatobiliary surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71515, Egypt
| | - Ahmed M Taha
- Hepatobiliary surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71515, Egypt
| | - Tameem M Ibraheem
- Hepatobiliary surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71515, Egypt
| | - Bashir A Fadel
- Hepatobiliary surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71515, Egypt
| | - Mohammed Geddawy
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jehan Ahmed Sayed
- Anesthesia and intensive care medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71515, Egypt
| | - Osama Ali Ibraheim
- Anesthesia and intensive care medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71515, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee TY, Fan HL, Wang CW, Hsieh CB, Chen TW. Somatostatin Therapy in Patients with Massive Ascites After Liver Transplantation. Ann Transplant 2019; 24:1-8. [PMID: 30598518 PMCID: PMC6327785 DOI: 10.12659/aot.911788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with massive ascites (MA) after liver transplantation (LT, defined here as daily ascitic drainage more than 1000 ml per day for more than 7 days after liver transplantation) are at increased risks of infection, hypoalbuminemia, graft loss, and even mortality. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the effects of somatostatin on patients with MA after LT. Material/Methods Twenty-eight patients with liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent LT complicated by MA postoperatively were included. Ten participants were receiving somatostatin therapy. The postoperative course and adverse drug effects were investigated. Daily postoperative ascitic drainage and urine output were also recorded and compared to those in the non-somatostatin group. Results The somatostatin group had significantly less ascites drainage after LT compared to the non-somatostatin group (p=0.002). Urine output was significantly increased after somatostatin administration (p<0.001). No serious adverse effects influencing graft function or fatal complications occurred after somatostatin therapy. Conclusions Somatostatin treatment is beneficial for the management of MA after liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-Ying Lee
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Lung Fan
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Wen Wang
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Bao Hsieh
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Teng-Wei Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
|
21
|
Taneja S, Chawla YK. Perioperative use of terlipressin in adult liver transplant. Liver Transpl 2017; 23:995-996. [PMID: 28618096 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2017] [Accepted: 06/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sunil Taneja
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Yogesh K Chawla
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|