Liver Transplantation for Dengue-induced Acute Liver Failure

Although liver involvement has been observed in over two-third cases of dengue viral infection, less than 1% cases progress to dengue-related acute liver failure (D-ALF). Various aspects of management of this disease remain debated including the need and timing of liver transplantation (LT). Moreover, the outcomes of LT for D-ALF have been suboptimal. We present four contrasting cases of D-ALF, two managed with LT and the other two conservatively to highlight the management dilemmas concerning LT in D-ALF. Based on our 4 cases, we would consider dengue shock syndrome, multisystem involvement and neurological deficit not completely accounted for by the ALF as potential contraindications for LT. These would need to be revisited on a case-to-case basis till larger studies define objective selection criteria for LT in D-ALF.

Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation in India: First Report of 5-Y Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Paucity of deceased donor livers has resulted in a 10-fold rise in living donor liver transplantations (LDLTs) performed in India over the past decade. Nonetheless, number of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) performed has improved with the establishment of simplified legal framework for certification of brain death and organ donation. In this study, we present our outcomes of DDLT performed at various centers, comparing their outcomes and provide a snapshot of the increasing number of DDLT across the state over the years.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent liver transplants from January 2010 till December 2019 by our transplant team in the state of Tamil Nadu, India, were included in the study. The program was established initially at the primary hospital in the year 2010 and with the evolution of the initial experience, transplant programs were expanded to the others hospital from the year 2015. Preoperative clinical data, intraoperative characteristics, and posttransplant outcomes of DDLT were analyzed from our prospective database.

RESULTS

A total of 362 DDLTs (331 adults, 31 children) were performed at 11 centers. Median (range) model for end-stage liver disease score was 16 (6-39). Forty-eight split, 11 combined liver kidney, and 4 auxiliary DDLTs were performed. One-, 3-, and 5-y survival was 87.2%, 80.4%, and 76.6% in adults and 80.6%, 80.6%, and 80.6% in children, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a country where over 80% of the LTs are performed as LDLT, we provide the first report of a heartening trend of increasing number of DDLT programs being established with excellent 5-y outcomes.

APASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of acute kidney injury in acute-on-chronic liver failure

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a syndrome that is characterized by the rapid development of organ failures predisposing these patients to a high risk of short-term early death. The main causes of organ failure in these patients are bacterial infections and systemic inflammation, both of which can be severe. For the majority of these patients, a prompt liver transplant is still the only effective course of treatment. Kidneys are one of the most frequent extrahepatic organs that are affected in patients with ACLF, since acute kidney injury (AKI) is reported in 22.8-34% of patients with ACLF. Approach and management of kidney injury could improve overall outcomes in these patients. Importantly, patients with ACLF more frequently have stage 3 AKI with a low rate of response to the current treatment modalities. The objective of the present position paper is to critically review and analyze the published data on AKI in ACLF, evolve a consensus, and provide recommendations for early diagnosis, pathophysiology, prevention, and management of AKI in patients with ACLF. In the absence of direct evidence, we propose expert opinions for guidance in managing AKI in this very challenging group of patients and focus on areas of future research. This consensus will be of major importance to all hepatologists, liver transplant surgeons, and intensivists across the globe.

2023 Update of Indian National Association for Study of the Liver Consensus on Management of Intermediate and Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Puri III Recommendations

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents significant treatment challenges despite considerable advancements in its management. The Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver (INASL) first published its guidelines to aid healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC in 2014. These guidelines were subsequently updated in 2019. However, INASL has recognized the need to revise its guidelines in 2023 due to recent rapid advancements in the diagnosis and management of HCC, particularly for intermediate and advanced stages. The aim is to provide healthcare professionals with evidence-based recommendations tailored to the Indian context. To accomplish this, a task force was formed, and a two-day round table discussion was held in Puri, Odisha. During this event, experts in their respective fields deliberated and finalized consensus statements to develop these updated guidelines. The 2023 INASL guidelines offer a comprehensive framework for the diagnosis, staging, and management of intermediate and advanced HCC in India. They represent a significant step forward in standardizing clinical practices nationwide, with the primary objective of ensuring that patients with HCC receive the best possible care based on the latest evidence. The guidelines cover various topics related to intermediate and advanced HCC, including biomarkers of aggressive behavior, staging, treatment options, and follow-up care.

Fecal calprotectin in patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Sepsis is the most challenging complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. It destabilizes patients leading to worsening of liver dysfunction and increased mortality. Intestinal bacterial dysbiosis, release of endotoxins, increased gut permeability and associated immune dysregulation have been described in cirrhotic patients with septic complications. Calprotectin is a major cytosolic protein secreted by the inflammatory cells and has been widely studied in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. We aimed at evaluating the role of fecal calprotectin (FCAL) in patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study on the utility of FCAL test was conducted in patients with liver cirrhosis. Fifteen milligrams of fecal specimen was collected and analyzed within 48 hours of hospitalization from patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD), acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) and at the time of outpatient visit for stable cirrhotics. Five healthy volunteers underwent FCAL test as control population.

RESULTS

The mean FCAL (µg/g) level in healthy control (n = 5), stable cirrhotics (n = 10), ESLD (n = 10) and ACLF (n = 10) patients was 109.2 (95% CI: - 53.39 to 271.79), 143.3 (95% CI: 50.5-236.45), 176.9 (95% CI: 122.93-230.87) and 543.5 (95% CI: 207.09-879.91) (p = 0.005), respectively. Sepsis was identified in 13 (43.3%) patients. Area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of FCAL was 0.80 (p = 0.005) and FCAL ≥ 200 µg/g (OR = 10.8, p = 0.006) was associated with sepsis. Nine (25.7%) patients expired. FCAL level was significantly higher in dead patients compared to survivors (mean, 493.67 (95% CI: 142.20-845.14) vs. 199.71 (95% CI: 99.84-299.59) μg/g,p = 0.005.

CONCLUSIONS

FCAL levels are increased in patients with chronic liver disease, with highest level in ACLF. An FCAL level of ≥ 200 µg/g was associated with sepsis and mortality in cirrhotic patients. Larger studies are required to identify the role of FCAL in these patients. Early identification and initiation of anti-microbials may mitigate sepsis and reduce mortality.

Frequent expression of PD-L1 in lymphocyte-rich hepatocellular carcinoma: A report of 4 cases

BACKGROUND

Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an immune checkpoint inhibitor. PD-L1 binds to its receptor programmed death receptor (PD-1) expressed by immune cells and plays a key role in regulating immune responses. Engagement of PD-L1 on cancer cells and PD-1 on immune cells avoid destruction of tumour cells by immune cells. Immunostaining with PD-L1 has been suggested as a biomarker predictive of antiPD-L1 immunotherapy. Lymphocyte-rich hepatocellular carcinoma (LrHCC) is a rare histological HCC subtype which is characterised by neoplastic epithelial cells intermixed with numerous immune cells.

METHODS

Here in we investigated immunohistochemical PD-L1 expression in 4 cases of LrHCC. Tumour proportion score (TPS) and immune cell score was recorded. Immunophenotypic characterization of the tumour and inflammatory cells was also done. Epstein-Barr encoding region (EBER) in situ hybridization (ISH) assay as performed in all four tumours.

RESULTS

Expression of PD-L1 was demonstrated in tumour epithelial cells and immune cells in all four cases. Incomplete to membranous staining was demonstrated in the tumour cells. Tumour proportion score (TPS) was 1.2-20 %. Immune cells demonstrated membranous and cytoplasmic immunostaining. Immune cell score was ≥1 % to >10 %.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression in both tumour and immune cells suggests distinct immunogenic feature and potential role of antiPD-L1 therapies in cases with inoperable disease.

Preventing Small-for-size Syndrome in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a well-recognized complication following liver transplantation (LT), with up to 20% developing this following living donor LT (LDLT). Preventing SFSS involves consideration of factors before the surgical procedure, including donor and recipient selection, and factors during the surgical procedure, including adequate outflow reconstruction, graft portal inflow modulation, and management of portosystemic shunts. International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplant Society of India Consensus Conference was convened in January 2023 to develop recommendations for the prediction and management of SFSS in LDLT. The format of the conference was based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. International experts in this field were allocated to 4 working groups (diagnosis, prevention, anesthesia, and critical care considerations, and management of established SFSS). The working groups prepared evidence-based recommendations to answer-specific questions considering the currently available literature. The working group members, independent panel, and conference attendees served as jury to edit and confirm the final recommendations presented at the end of the conference by each working group separately. This report presents the final statements and evidence-based recommendations provided by working group 2 that can be implemented to prevent SFSS in LDLT patients.

Biphenotypic Immunohistochemical Features and NTRK1 Amplification in Intermediate Cell Carcinoma of the Liver

Intermediate cell carcinoma is one of the rarest forms of primary liver cancer comprising relatively monomorphic populations of neoplastic epithelial cells demonstrating simultaneous positivity of both hepatocyte and cholangiocyte immunohistochemical markers. Here in, we describe an adult male patient who underwent left hepatectomy for a large liver tumor. The pathological and immunohistochemical analysis revealed the malignant primary liver cancer with intermediate cell morphology and mixed immunophenotypic features consistent with intermediate cell carcinoma. Furthermore, the genomic profiling using the Next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform demonstrated that there is a novel amplification with copy number gain 12 (12 gene copies) in the Neurotrophic Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 1 (NTRK1) gene, being an oncogenic driver of intermediate cell carcinoma. This is the first case report with the amplification in NTRK1 and emphasizes the importance of molecular oncology.

Identifying the early predictors of non-response to steroids in patients with flare of autoimmune hepatitis causing acute-on-chronic liver failure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Early identification of non-response to steroids is critical in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) causing acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). We assessed if this non-response can be accurately identified within first few days of treatment.

METHODS

Patients with AIH-ACLF without baseline infection/hepatic encephalopathy were identified from APASL ACLF research consortium (AARC) database. Diagnosis of AIH-ACLF was based mainly on histology. Those treated with steroids were assessed for non-response (defined as death or liver transplant at 90 days for present study). Laboratory parameters, AARC, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores were assessed at baseline and day 3 to identify early non-response. Utility of dynamic SURFASA score [- 6.80 + 1.92*(D0-INR) + 1.94*(∆%3-INR) + 1.64*(∆%3-bilirubin)] was also evaluated. The performance of early predictors was compared with changes in MELD score at 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifty-five out of one hundred and sixty-five patients (age-38.2 ± 15.0 years, 67.2% females) with AIH-ACLF [median MELD 24 (IQR: 22-27); median AARC score 7 (6-9)] given oral prednisolone 40 (20-40) mg per day were analyzed. The 90 day transplant-free survival in this cohort was 45.7% with worse outcomes in those with incident infections (56% vs 28.0%, p = 0.03). The AUROC of pre-therapy AARC score [0.842 (95% CI 0.754-0.93)], MELD [0.837 (95% CI 0.733-0.94)] score and SURFASA score [0.795 (95% CI 0.678-0.911)] were as accurate as ∆MELD at 2 weeks [0.770 (95% CI 0.687-0.845), p = 0.526] and better than ∆MELD at 3 days [0.541 (95% CI 0.395, 0.687), p < 0.001] to predict non-response. Combination of AARC score > 6, MELD score > 24 with SURFASA score ≥ - 1.2, could identify non-responders at day 3 (concomitant- 75% vs either - 42%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Baseline AARC score, MELD score, and the dynamic SURFASA score on day 3 can accurately identify early non-response to steroids in AIH-ACLF.

Outcome of Patients Waitlisted for Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Center Experience

Background and aim

COVID-19 pandemic has strained several healthcare resources across the world. While liver transplantation (LT) is the only curative therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease, we aimed to determine the clinical outcome of patients waitlisted for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) during COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

A retrospective comparative observational study of adult patients waitlisted for DDLT from January 2019 to January 2022 at our liver unit (Dr Rela Institute and Medical Center, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India) was carried out. Patient demographics, disease etiology, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease - Sodium (MELD-Na) score were calculated for all patients listed during the study period. Clinical event was defined as number of DDLT, death in the absence of transplant, and patients awaiting LT were compared. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS V24.0.

Results

In total, 310 patients were waitlisted for DDLT, of whom 148, 63, and 99 patients listed during 2019, 2020, and 2021 (till January 2022), respectively; 22 (53.6%), 10 (24.3%), and 9 (21.9%) patients underwent DDLT in the year 2019, 2020, and 2021 (P = 0.000); 137 patients (44.19%) died on the DDLT waitlist of whom 41 (29.9%), 67 (48.9%), and 29 (21.1%) in the year 2019, 2020, and 2021 (P = 0.000), respectively. Waitlist mortality was significantly higher during the COVID first wave.

Conclusion

COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted patients waitlisted for DDLT in India. With limited access to healthcare facilities and decreased organ donation rates during the pandemic, there was a considerable reduction in the patients waitlisted for DDLT, lesser number of patients underwent DDLT, and higher waitlist mortality during the pandemic year. Efforts to improve organ donation in India should be strongly implemented.

Post-COVID-19 cholangiopathy: Current understanding and management options

Post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cholangiopathy (PCC) is a rare but life-threatening complication of COVID-19 infection. PCC typically presents when patients recovering from the contagion and manifests as cholestasis in patients with no history of pre-existing liver disease. The pathogenesis of PCC is little understood. Hepatic injury in PCC could be mediated by the predilection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 for cholangiocytes. Though PCC shows some resemblance to secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients, it is considered as a separate and unique entity in the literature. Various treatment options like ursodeoxycholic acid, steroids, plasmapheresis, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography guided interventions have been tried but with limited success. We have noticed significant improvement in liver function with antiplatelet therapy in a couple of patients. PCC can progress to end-stage liver disease necessitating liver transplantation. In this article, we discuss the current knowledge of PCC focusing on its pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management strategies.

Liver Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension

The understanding of pathogenesis of portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis continues to evolve. In addition to progressive fibrosis, cirrhosis is characterized by parenchymal extinction and vascular remodelling, causing architectural distortion. Existence of prothrombotic state and more recently, intestinal bacterial dysbiosis are recently described in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is an important prognostic milestone in patients with liver cirrhosis. This is a pre-symptomatic phase that predicts the development of varices, ascites and importantly increased risk of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CSPH is associated with significantly reduced survival. Endoscopic surveillance is necessary in these patients. Non-selective Beta-blocker is the preferred therapy for primary prophylaxis in the management of portal hypertension. Patients with acute variceal bleed should be resuscitated appropriately, followed by vasoactive drugs and endoscopic therapy. Early TIPS should be considered in those with refractory bleed or in endoscopic treatment failure. Application of artificial intelligence and machine learning may be useful in future for identifying patients at risk of variceal hemorrhage.

COVID-19: Time for a clinical classification?

COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus has been around for 2 years causing significant health-care catastrophes in most parts of the world. The understanding of COVID-19 continues to expand, with multiple newer developments such as the presence of asymptomatic cases, feco-oral transmission, and endothelial dysfunction. The existing classification was developed before this current understanding. With the availability of recent literature evidences, we have attempted a classification encompassing pathogenesis and clinical features for better understanding of the disease process. The pathogenesis of COVID-19 continues to evolve. The spiked protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus binds to ACE2 receptors causes direct cytopathic damage and hyperinflammatory injury. In addition to alveolar cells, ACE2 is also distributed in gastrointestinal tract and vascular endothelium. ACE2-SARS-CoV-2 interaction engulfs the receptors leading to depletion. Accumulation of Ang2 via AT1 receptor (AT1R) binding causes upregulation of macrophage activity leading to pro-inflammatory cytokine release. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) has been attributed to cause hyperinflammatory syndrome in COVID-19. In addition, it also causes severe widespread endothelial injury through soluble IL-6 receptors. Thrombotic complications occur following the cleavage and activation of von Willebrand factor. Based on the above understanding, clinical features, organ involvement, risk stratification, and disease severity, we have classified COVID-19 patients into asymptomatic, pulmonary, GI, and systemic COVID-19 (S-COVID-19). Studies show that the infectivity and prognosis are different and distinct amongst these groups. Systemic-COVID-19 patients are more likely to be critically ill with multi-organ dysfunction and thrombo-embolic complications.

Erratum to 'Indian National Association for the Study of Liver Consensus Statement on Acute Liver Failure (Part-2): Management of Acute Liver Failure' [J Clin Exp Hepatol 10 (2020) 477-517]

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2020.04.011.].

Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Posttransplant Outcomes in Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Older Adult Recipients

The impact of increasing recipient age on morbidity and mortality following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains controversial. The study aims to analyze the impact of recipient age on outcomes following LDLT. Data on adult LDLTs performed between November 2009 and February 2020 were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on recipient age: 18 to 65 years (younger adults) and >65 years (older adults). Propensity score matching (PSM) using nearest-neighbor matching was used to match each older recipient with up to 2 younger adult recipients using multiple preoperative parameters. Outcomes evaluated were duration of ventilation, need for reintubation, tracheostomy, intensive care unit (ICU) readmission, length of ICU and hospital stays, postoperative complications, reoperation within 90 days, and patient survival. A total of 801 adult LDLT recipients were included in the study; 751 (93.7%) were younger adults, and 50 (6.3%) were older adults. Older recipients were more likely to be diabetic (60.0% versus 39.7%) and hypertensive (44.0% versus 20.4%) with preexisting cardiac disease (28.0% versus 11.2%). However, their pretransplant Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was significantly lower (14.5 versus 17.7), and they were more likely to receive a transplant because of hepatocellular carcinoma (38.0% versus 17.7%). Older recipients had longer durations of ventilation after LT both before (3.7 versus 1.9 days) and after PSM (4.0 versus 1.5 days). After PSM, the 30-day (13.0% versus 2.4%), 90-day (15.2% and 2.4%), and overall mortality rates (21.7% versus 7.1%) were significantly higher for older recipients when compared with younger recipients. There was no difference between the younger and older recipients with respect to other postoperative outcomes. This propensity score-matched study shows that the older LDLT recipients have higher 30-day, 90-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality rates when compared with matched younger counterparts.

Hereditary Persistence of Alpha-Fetoprotein in Chronic Liver Disease-Confusing Genes!

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a glycoprotein secreted by the embryonic liver and is expressed in tumours with high mitotic index such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and germ cell tumours. Detection of elevated AFP is strongly associated with underlying HCC or occasionally germ cell tumour. Modest elevation of AFP can be observed in patients with chronic viral hepatitis particularly with active replication. Very rarely, incidental detection of raised AFP in a genetically susceptible individuals has been reported in the absence of the underlying malignant process. This condition is termed as hereditary persistence of AFP (HPAFP), a rare disorder with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. HPAFP should be suspected in patients with high AFP in the absence of radiological evidence of HCC or germ cell tumour. The diagnosis is confirmed by the identification of AFP gene mutation. AFP gene is located in the long arm of chromosome 4. The most common single-nucleotide polymorphism in HPAFP is 119 G > A, rs587776861, interestingly reported only in six family clusters worldwide. Despite being described as a benign disorder, its implication in patients with underlying chronic liver disease needs further clarification. Here, we describe 3 patients in their forties with chronic liver disease and persistently elevated levels of AFP, where genetic studies confirmed HPAFP. None of our patients had HCC despite extensive investigations.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange for Management of Early Allograft Dysfunction After Living Donor Liver Transplant: An Unmatched Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Therapeutic plasma exchange has been reported to be useful in the management of acute liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure. This retrospective study evaluated therapeutic plasma exchange as an adjunct to standard supportive care for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive adult living donor liver transplants performed from January 2015 to February 2019 were included. Patients treated without or with therapeutic plasma exchange for early allograft dysfunction (Olthoff criteria) were compared.

RESULTS

There were 465 adult transplant recipients, and 67 (14.4%) had early allograft dysfunction, of which 43 (64%) had therapeutic plasma exchange and 24 (36%) did not. Fourteen patients were excluded, as they had both preoperative and immediate postoperative therapeutic plasma exchange (5 patients with acute liver failure and 9 with acute-on-chronic liver failure). The therapeutic plasma exchange group (n = 29) had more preoperative acute kidney injury (55.2% vs 25.0%; P = .009), lower graft-recipient weight ratio (0.96 vs 1.09; P = .043), and slightly higher final portal pressure (11 vs 10 mg/dL; P = .027). Therapeutic plasma exchange was started at a median of postoperative day 9, with median serum bilirubin of 13.6 mg/dL and a median of 3 sessions per patient. There was no 90-day mortality in the group without therapeutic plasma exchange; however, in the therapeutic plasma exchange group, 13 patients (45%) died (P < .001). Patients who received therapeutic plasma exchange had more septic complications (62.1% vs 12.5%; P < .001) and needed more postoperative renal replacement therapy (51.7% vs 8.3%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to compare patients treated with or without therapeutic plasma exchange for early allograft dysfunction in the living donor liver transplant setting. Within the limitations of this retrospective study, we were unable to confirm whether therapeutic plasma exchange could increase early mortality.

Auto-immune hepatitis following COVID vaccination

Unprecedented loss of life due to the COVID pandemic has necessitated the development of several vaccines in record time. Most of these vaccines have received approval without being extensively whetted for their adverse effect and efficacy profiles. Most adverse effects have been mild, nonetheless, more serious thromboembolic events have also been reported. Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) can occur in predisposed individuals where an immune mediated reaction against hepatocytes is triggered by environmental factors. Vaccines are a very rare cause of AIH. We report two such cases of AIH triggered by COVID (Covishield) vaccination. While one patient made an uneventful recovery, another succumbed to the liver disease. Ours is the first report of Covishield vaccination related AIH and second ever after any form of COVID vaccination. We hope that our report does not deter COVID vaccination drives. However, we also hope to raise awareness of its potential side effects and the increased role of pharmacovigilance in guiding treatment.

Liver Transplantation Society of India Guidelines for the Management of Acute Liver Injury Secondary to Yellow Phosphorus-Containing Rodenticide Poisoning Using the Modified Delphi Technique of Consensus Development

BACKGROUND

Acute liver failure caused by the ingestion of yellow phosphorus-containing rodenticide has been increasing in incidence over the last decade and is a common indication for emergency liver transplantation in Southern and Western India and other countries. Clear guidelines for its management are necessary, given its unpredictable course, potential for rapid deterioration and variation in clinical practice.

METHODS

A modified Delphi approach was used for developing consensus guidelines under the aegis of the Liver Transplantation Society of India. A detailed review of the published literature was performed. Recommendations for three areas of clinical practice, assessment and initial management, intensive care unit (ICU) management and liver transplantation, were developed.

RESULTS

The expert panel consisted of 16 clinicians, 3 nonclinical specialists and 5 senior advisory members from 11 centres. Thirty-one recommendations with regard to criteria for hospital admission and discharge, role of medical therapies, ICU management, evidence for extracorporeal therapies such as renal replacement therapy and therapeutic plasma exchange, early predictors of need for liver transplantation and perioperative care were developed based on published evidence and combined clinical experience.

CONCLUSION

Development of these guidelines should help standardise care for patients with yellow phosphorus poisoning and identify areas for collaborative research.

Optimal diagnostic tool for surveillance of oesophageal varices during COVID-19 pandemic

AIM

To study the diagnostic accuracy and utility of triphasic abdominal computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis and grading of oesophageal varices (OVs) as an alternative to endoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective analysis was undertaken of retrospective data from cirrhotic patients who underwent oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (OGD) and a triphasic abdominal CT from January to December 2019. Endoscopists and radiologists provided their respective independent assessment of OV grading after being blinded to the clinical details. Performance of CT grading of OVs was compared with the reference standard endoscopic grading using weighted kappa (k). Non-invasive scores such, as aspartate transaminase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) Index, platelet: spleen (PS) ratio were correlated between the two techniques.

RESULTS

OV grading between endoscopists and radiologists showed 81.73% agreement (85 out of 104 patients) in the comparative analysis of 104 cirrhotic patients, of which no varices (57.1%, n=4), small (85.1%, n=23), medium (72.2%%, n=26), and large varices (94.1%, n=32) with a weighted k score of 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.82-0.94). Overall, the sensitivity of CT in the diagnosis of no, small, medium, and large OVs was 66.6%, 79.3%, 89.6%, and 94.1%, respectively, with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) score of 0.775, 0.887, 0.839, and 0.914. Performance of APRI, FIB-4, and PS ratio correlated well with the severity of OVs with no difference between OGD and CT grading.

CONCLUSION

Triphasic abdominal CT can be an invaluable tool in the diagnosis and grading of OVs during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Patient blood management in a patient with multiple red cell antibodies (anti-C, anti-e, and anti-K) undergoing liver transplant in South India: A team approach

End-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients undergoing liver transplant (LT) surgery are often multiply alloimmunized and pose significant challenges to the transfusion services in terms of red cell cross-match incompatibility, unpredictable blood requirements, and often lead to significant delays in availing compatible red cell units. We report a case of a 64-year-old female from Bahrain, a known case of hepatitis C-related ESLD referred for LT surgery. She had a history of multiple uneventful transfusions in the preceding year. Her blood group was A-positive, direct antiglobulin test, and cold antibodies were negative. Indirect antiglobulin test was positive, and antibody identification confirmed the presence of anti-C, anti-e, and anti-K. Her red cell phenotype was R₂R₂ and Kell negative (C-c+E+e-K-). The patient was started on erythropoietin. Requests for R₂R₂ and Kell negative units were sent to various blood banks across the country. After >800 A/O group units phenotyping and a waiting period of 6 weeks, two compatible R₂R₂ phenotypes and Kell negative could be arranged in-house and three units were received from Gurgaon, North India. Intraoperative management included blood preservation techniques including cell salvage, antifibrinolytic drug, and monitoring using thromboelastography. The estimated blood loss was 350 ml with pre- and postoperative Hb 10.4 gm% and 9.2 gm%, respectively. She received intraoperatively two units of single-donor platelet and four units of fresh frozen plasma and postoperatively one unit of leukocyte-depleted-packed red cells and doing well at 12-month follow-up. This case highlights the importance of advance immunohematology for timely detection of alloimmunization and providing antigen-negative compatible units, proper communication between the transfusion specialists, and the clinical team for proper patient blood management as well as the need for central rare donor registry program to avoid delays in providing compatible blood in such inevitable cases.

COVID-19 and the liver

The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has become a major public health crisis over the past few months. Overall case fatality rates range between 2-6%; however, the rates are higher in the elderly and those with underlying comorbidities like diabetes, hypertension and heart disease. Recent reports showed that about 2-11% of patients with COVID-19 had underlying chronic liver disease. During the previous SARS epidemic, around 60% of patients were reported to develop various degrees of liver damage. In the current pandemic, hepatic dysfunction has been seen in 14-53% of patients with COVID-19, particularly in those with severe disease. Cases of acute liver injury have been reported and are associated with higher mortality. Hepatic involvement in COVID-19 could be related to the direct cytopathic effect of the virus, an uncontrolled immune reaction, sepsis or drug-induced liver injury. The postulated mechanism of viral entry is through the host angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors that are abundantly present in type 2 alveolar cells. Interestingly, ACE2 receptors are expressed in the gastrointestinal tract, vascular endothelium and cholangiocytes of the liver. The effects of COVID-19 on underlying chronic liver disease require detailed evaluation and, with data currently lacking, further research is warranted in this area.

COVID-19: Poor outcomes in patients with zinc deficiency

Background

Zinc is a trace element with potent immunoregulatory and antiviral properties, and is utilized in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, we do not know the clinical significance of serum Zinc levels in COVID-19 patients. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical significance of serum zinc in COVID-19 patients and to establish a correlation with disease severity.

Methods

This was a prospective study of fasting zinc levels in COVID-19 patients at the time of hospitalization. An initial comparative analysis was conducted between COVID-19 patients and healthy controls. COVID-19 patients with zinc deficiency were compared to those with normal zinc levels.

Results

COVID-19 patients (n = 47) showed significantly lower zinc levels when compared to healthy controls (n = 45): median 74.5 (interquartile range 53.4–94.6) μg/dl vs 105.8 (interquartile range 95.65–120.90) μg/dl (p < 0.001). Amongst the COVID-19 patients, 27 (57.4%) were found to be zinc deficient. These patients were found to have higher rates of complications (p = 0.009), acute respiratory distress syndrome (18.5% vs 0%, p = 0.06), corticosteroid therapy (p = 0.02), prolonged hospital stay (p = 0.05), and increased mortality (18.5% vs 0%, p = 0.06). The odds ratio (OR) of developing complications was 5.54 for zinc deficient COVID-19 patients.

Conclusions

The study data clearly show that a significant number of COVID-19 patients were zinc deficient. These zinc deficient patients developed more complications, and the deficiency was associated with a prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality.

Indian National Association for the Study of Liver Consensus Statement on Acute Liver Failure (Part-2): Management of Acute Liver Failure

Acute liver failure (ALF) is not an uncommon complication of a common disease such as acute hepatitis. Viral hepatitis followed by antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity are the commonest causes of ALF in India. Clinically, such patients present with appearance of jaundice, encephalopathy, and coagulopathy. Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and cerebral edema are central and most important clinical event in the course of ALF, followed by superadded infections, and determine the outcome in these patients. The pathogenesis of encephalopathy and cerebral edema in ALF is unique and multifactorial. Ammonia plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis, and several therapies aim to correct this abnormality. The role of newer ammonia-lowering agents is still evolving. These patients are best managed at a tertiary care hospital with facility for liver transplantation (LT). Aggressive intensive medical management has been documented to salvage a substantial proportion of patients. In those with poor prognostic factors, LT is the only effective therapy that has been shown to improve survival. However, recognizing suitable patients with poor prognosis has remained a challenge. Close monitoring, early identification and treatment of complications, and couseling for transplant form the first-line approach to manage such patients. Recent research shows that use of dynamic prognostic models is better for selecting patients undergoing liver transplantation and timely transplant can save life of patients with ALF with poor prognostic factors.

Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver Consensus Statement on Acute Liver Failure (Part 1): Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Presentation and Prognosis

Acute liver failure (ALF) is an infrequent, unpredictable, potentially fatal complication of acute liver injury (ALI) consequent to varied etiologies. Etiologies of ALF as reported in the literature have regional differences, which affects the clinical presentation and natural course. In this part of the consensus article designed to reflect the clinical practices in India, disease burden, epidemiology, clinical presentation, monitoring, and prognostication have been discussed. In India, viral hepatitis is the most frequent cause of ALF, with drug-induced hepatitis due to antituberculosis drugs being the second most frequent cause. The clinical presentation of ALF is characterized by jaundice, coagulopathy, and encephalopathy. It is important to differentiate ALF from other causes of liver failure, including acute on chronic liver failure, subacute liver failure, as well as certain tropical infections which can mimic this presentation. The disease often has a fulminant clinical course with high short-term mortality. Death is usually attributable to cerebral complications, infections, and resultant multiorgan failure. Timely liver transplantation (LT) can change the outcome, and hence, it is vital to provide intensive care to patients until LT can be arranged. It is equally important to assess prognosis to select patients who are suitable for LT. Several prognostic scores have been proposed, and their comparisons show that indigenously developed dynamic scores have an edge over scores described from the Western world. Management of ALF will be described in part 2 of this document.

Awareness and Concerns Among Adult Liver Transplant Recipients in the Current Pandemic Caused by Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19): Strategies to Safeguard a High-risk Population

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus is spreading rapidly, and there are obvious concerns for the immunocompromised patient population including transplant recipients. Creating awareness and understanding patient concerns will play an important role in protecting this vulnerable group in developing timely and appropriate healthcare interventions.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between 23rd March 2020 and 1st April 2020 among 154 liver transplant recipients, transplanted between October 2018 and February 2020. An 18-point questionnaire explored their knowledge of COVID-19, awareness of recipient's high-risk status, interventions to minimize cross-infections, and concerns of this patient group regarding the pandemic.

RESULTS

There were 112 (73%) respondents, with median age of 53 years (81% males). There was no difference in demographics between those who responded (n = 112) and those who did not respond to the survey (n = 42). Most of the recipients were aware of the main symptoms of COVID-19, such as fever (92%), breathlessness (86%), and dry cough (87%), but less than half were aware of diarrhea (39%) as a symptom. Awareness about spread from asymptomatic individuals was limited (26%). Majority (95%) understood their high-risk status, but worryingly, 23% of the respondents felt that there was no risk in visiting the hospital for routine clinic visit and blood tests. Concerns were raised by the recipients mostly regarding the uncertainties of COVID-19 infection and its treatment options, the quality of information on social messaging platforms, and lack of access to routine tests/immunosuppression levels because of lockdown/social distancing.

CONCLUSIONS

Our liver transplant recipients have a reasonable awareness regarding COVID-19. Problems in accessing the healthcare system during prolonged periods of lockdown was a major concern. It is important for each transplant unit to educate, support, and remain accessible to this vulnerable patient cohort as the pandemic continues to progress worldwide.

Hepatitis B immunoglobulin prophylaxis after liver transplantation: experience in a tertiary transplant centre

BACKGROUND

Prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleoside analogs can prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplant (LT).

AIM

To determine the efficacy and cost of maintaining immunoprophylaxis with HBIG and hyperimmune plasma (HIP) for 6 months after LT.

MATERIAL & METHODS

The study included 22 HBV related LT recipients who were on entecavir and either HBIG or HIP for 6 months. Post transplant HBIG or HIP dose and cost incurred towards prophylaxis were noted. The cost of 200 IU of HBIG at the time of study was Rs 8250/- (US Dollars 135) and that of 2000 IU of HIP was Rs 8000/- (USD 130.7). The loading and maintenance costs at end of 6 months were compared between the two groups. Response to HBIG and HIP was assessed by checking for HBsAg reactivity, anti HBs titer response and HBV DNA viral load.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Median and range, Kruskal Wallis (KW) sign rank Sum Test and Correlation Coefficient (r2) was used for analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen recipients received HBIG and 9 recipients HIP. The anti HBs response to HIP was significantly high compared to HBIG (KW Sign rank Sum test P < 0.05); titers remained high until the study period. Between 8 and 30 days, the titer achieved by both HBIG and HIP was similar (KW Sign rank Sum test not significant). Despite low anti HBs titer of <100 IU/L, none of the recipients on HBIG had HBsAg reactivity while 3 on HIP had transient HBsAg positivity. The total cost with HBIG was 13.9 times the cost of HIP.

CONCLUSION

HIP immunoprophylaxis in combination with entecavir achieves a high anti HBs titer at a significant low cost during anhepatic and loading phase. HBV reactivation rates with HBIG and HIP is low despite low anti HBs titer.

A new era in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has evolved over the past three decades. At the start, treatment involved interferon monotherapy followed by combination therapy using interferon and ribavirin, and subsequently evolved to pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and ribavirin. In genotype 1 infection, rates of sustained virological response (SVR) are approximately 45 % with Peg-IFN and ribavirin, whereas SVR rates in genotypes 2 and 3 infections are as high as 70 % to 80 %. Side effects and cost related to these drugs are important concerns, particularly in countries like India where patients have to bear their health expenses. In the recent past, there has been a significant change in course with the on-going search and the development of more effective drugs in the management of HCV infection. Telaprevir and Boceprevir are two new potent protease inhibitors (direct acting antiviral or DAA agents) which, when administered with Peg-IFN and ribavirin, have shown to result significantly higher SVR rates in phase 3 studies in patients with genotype 1 infection, both in treatment naïve patients (up to 75 %) and those with previously failed therapy. Several other new antiviral agents some in combination with Peg-IFN and ribavirin and some in combination without Peg-IFN (IFN-free regimens) are currently being tested in patients with genotype 1, 2 and 3 infections and are expected to dramatically change the armamentarium of HCV therapy in the coming years.

Macrophage secretory products induce an inflammatory phenotype in hepatocytes

AIM: To investigate the influence of macrophages on hepatocyte phenotype and function.

METHODS: Macrophages were differentiated from THP-1 monocytes via phorbol myristate acetate stimulation and the effects of monocyte or macrophage-conditioned medium on HepG2 mRNA and protein expression determined. The in vivo relevance of these findings was confirmed using liver biopsies from 147 patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

RESULTS: Conditioned media from macrophages, but not monocytes, induced a transient morphological change in hepatocytes associated with upregulation of vimentin (7.8 ± 2.5-fold, P = 0.045) and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 (2.6 ± 0.2-fold, P < 0.001) and downregulation of epithelial cadherin (1.7 ± 0.02-fold, P = 0.017) mRNA expression. Microarray analysis revealed significant upregulation of lipocalin-2 (17-fold, P < 0.001) and pathways associated with inflammation, and substantial downregulation of pathways related to hepatocyte function. In patients with chronic HCV, real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry confirmed an increase in lipocalin-2 mRNA (F0 1.0 ± 0.3, F1 2.2 ± 0.2, F2 3.0 ± 9.3, F3/4 4.0 ± 0.8, P = 0.003) and protein expression (F1 1.0 ± 0.5, F2 1.3 ± 0.4, F3/4 3.6 ± 0.4, P = 0.014) with increasing liver injury. High performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis identified elevated levels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 in macrophage-conditioned medium, and a chemical inhibitor of MMP-9 attenuated the change in morphology and mRNA expression of TGF-β1 (2.9 ± 0.2 vs 1.04 ± 0.1, P < 0.001) in macrophage-conditioned media treated HepG2 cells. In patients with chronic HCV infection, hepatic mRNA expression of CD163 (F0 1.0 ± 0.2, F1/2 2.8 ± 0.3, F3/4 5.3 ± 1.0, P = 0.001) and MMP-9 (F0 1.0 ± 0.4, F1/2 2.8 ± 0.3, F3/4 4.1 ± 0.8, P = 0.011) was significantly associated with increasing stage of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION: Secreted macrophage products alter the phenotype and function of hepatocytes, with increased expression of inflammatory mediators, suggesting that hepatocytes actively participate in liver injury.

Treatment of autoimmune hepatitis: a review of current and evolving therapies

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immune-mediated necroinflammatory condition of the liver. Presentation can vary from the asymptomatic individual with abnormal liver function test to fulminant liver failure. The diagnosis is based on the combination of biochemical, autoimmune, and histological parameters, and exclusion of other liver diseases. Standard therapy consists of a combination of corticosteroids and azathioprine, which is efficacious in 80% of patients. Alternative therapies are increasingly being explored in patients who do not respond to the standard treatment and/or have unacceptable adverse effects. This review examines the role of alternative drugs (second-line agents) available for AIH treatment non-responders. These agents include budesonide, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporin, tacrolimus, 6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine, rituximab, ursodeoxycholic acid, rapamycin, and methotrexate. In addition, the risk of opportunistic infections and malignancies are discussed. A treatment algorithm is proposed for the management of patients with AIH treatment non-responders.

Long-term immunosuppression for prevention of nonviral disease recurrence

The choice of immunosuppressive regime used after liver transplantation depends on many factors, which should include the effect of disease recurrence; recurrence of disease after liver transplantation may be affected by the degree and type of immunosuppression used and recurrent disease may affect patient and graft survival. For autoimmune diseases, recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis develops sooner and more rapidly in those on tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine, but graft loss from recurrent disease is uncommon; recurrence rates of primary sclerosing cholangitis is unaffected by immunosuppressive regimes and recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis may be reduced by prescription of corticosteroids. Whether the immunosuppressive regime affects the pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence is uncertain. It is probable that the use of calcineurin inhibitor does not have a significant effect and inhibitors of TOR may have an anti-cancer effect, but this still has to be shown clinically. Most metabolic diseases are not affected by the choice of immunosuppression, although recurrence of sarcoidosis may be prevented by corticosteroids.