Optimal diagnostic tool for surveillance of oesophageal varices during COVID-19 pandemic

AIM

To study the diagnostic accuracy and utility of triphasic abdominal computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis and grading of oesophageal varices (OVs) as an alternative to endoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective analysis was undertaken of retrospective data from cirrhotic patients who underwent oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (OGD) and a triphasic abdominal CT from January to December 2019. Endoscopists and radiologists provided their respective independent assessment of OV grading after being blinded to the clinical details. Performance of CT grading of OVs was compared with the reference standard endoscopic grading using weighted kappa (k). Non-invasive scores such, as aspartate transaminase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) Index, platelet: spleen (PS) ratio were correlated between the two techniques.

RESULTS

OV grading between endoscopists and radiologists showed 81.73% agreement (85 out of 104 patients) in the comparative analysis of 104 cirrhotic patients, of which no varices (57.1%, n=4), small (85.1%, n=23), medium (72.2%%, n=26), and large varices (94.1%, n=32) with a weighted k score of 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.82-0.94). Overall, the sensitivity of CT in the diagnosis of no, small, medium, and large OVs was 66.6%, 79.3%, 89.6%, and 94.1%, respectively, with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) score of 0.775, 0.887, 0.839, and 0.914. Performance of APRI, FIB-4, and PS ratio correlated well with the severity of OVs with no difference between OGD and CT grading.

CONCLUSION

Triphasic abdominal CT can be an invaluable tool in the diagnosis and grading of OVs during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Long-term immunosuppression for prevention of nonviral disease recurrence

The choice of immunosuppressive regime used after liver transplantation depends on many factors, which should include the effect of disease recurrence; recurrence of disease after liver transplantation may be affected by the degree and type of immunosuppression used and recurrent disease may affect patient and graft survival. For autoimmune diseases, recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis develops sooner and more rapidly in those on tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine, but graft loss from recurrent disease is uncommon; recurrence rates of primary sclerosing cholangitis is unaffected by immunosuppressive regimes and recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis may be reduced by prescription of corticosteroids. Whether the immunosuppressive regime affects the pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence is uncertain. It is probable that the use of calcineurin inhibitor does not have a significant effect and inhibitors of TOR may have an anti-cancer effect, but this still has to be shown clinically. Most metabolic diseases are not affected by the choice of immunosuppression, although recurrence of sarcoidosis may be prevented by corticosteroids.