Association of Pretransplant Renal Function With Liver Graft and Patient Survival After Liver Transplantation in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 is a potential predictor of post-liver transplant renal outcomes

Acute kidney injury is considered an independent prognostic factor for mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. Non-treated acute kidney injury can progress to hepatorenal syndrome with a poor prognosis. As suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) is a member of the interleukin-1 receptor family that aggravates inflammation and fibrotic changes in multiple organs, we measured soluble ST2 (sST2) level in the serum and urine of liver-transplant recipients at the time of transplantation. The serum sST2 level significantly increased in liver-transplant recipients with suppressed kidney function compared with that in recipients with normal function. In recipients with severely decreased liver function (model for end-stage liver disease score ≥ 30), the serum sST2 level was higher than that in recipients with preserved liver function (model for end-stage liver disease score ≤ 20, P = 0.028). The serum sST2 level in recipients with hepatorenal syndrome was higher than that in liver-transplant recipients without hepatorenal syndrome (P = 0.003). The serum sST2 level in patients with hepatorenal syndrome was higher than that in recipients without a history of acute kidney injury (P = 0.004). Recipients with hepatorenal syndrome and recovered kidney function showed higher sST2 levels than those who did not recover (P = 0.034). Collectively, an increase in the serum sST2 level reflects a decrease in both kidney and liver functions. Thus, measuring sST2 level at the time of liver transplantation can help predict renal outcomes.

Poor Outcomes of Patients With NAFLD and Moderate Renal Dysfunction or Short-Term Dialysis Receiving a Liver Transplant Alone

The outcomes of patients with moderate renal impairment and the impact of liver disease etiology on renal function recovery after liver transplant alone (LTA) are largely unknown. We explored whether NAFLD patients with pre-LTA moderate renal dysfunction (GFR 25-45 ml/min/1.73 m²) may be more susceptible to develop post-LTA severe renal dysfunction (GFR<15 ml/min/1.73 m²) than ALD patients, as well as other overall outcomes. Using the UNOS/OPTN database, we selected patients undergoing liver transplant for NAFLD or ALD (2006-2016), 15,103 of whom received LTA. NAFLD patients with moderate renal dysfunction were more likely to develop subsequent GFR<15 ml/min/1.73 m² than ALD patients (11.1% vs. 7.38%, p < 0.001). Patients on short-term dialysis pre-LTA (≤12 weeks) were more likely to develop severe renal dysfunction (31.7% vs. 18.1%), especially in NAFLD patients, and were more likely to receive a further kidney transplant (15.3% vs. 3.7%) and had lower survival (48.6% vs. 50.4%) after LTA (p < 0.001 for all). NAFLD was an independent risk factor for post-LTA severe renal dysfunction (HR = 1.2, p = 0.02). NAFLD patients with moderate renal dysfunction and those receiving short-term dialysis prior to LTA are at a higher risk of developing subsequent severe renal dysfunction. Underlying etiology of liver disease may play a role in predicting development and progression of renal failure in patients receiving LTA.

Clinical evidence of outcomes following liver transplantation in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: An updated meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a dramatically growing indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide and the posttransplant outcomes of NASH patients are currently under intensive investigation. This quantitative meta-analysis aimed to update the clinical evidence on outcomes of transplanted patients with NASH.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies (published up to September 15, 2021) that focused on LT outcomes for NASH versus non-NASH patients. Random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses based on crucial baseline clinical characteristics and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the pooled results. Meta-regression was used to evaluate study-level demographic, clinical, and biochemical characteristics to identify potential confounders affecting patient survival.

RESULTS

Twenty-two non-randomized comparative studies with 1,538 NASH and 6,014 non-NASH patients were included. 1- (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.77-1.14), 3- (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 1.00-1.22), and 5- (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.84-1.31) year patient survival was equivalent between NASH and non-NASH recipients. NASH patients were associated with similar cardiovascular mortality (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.89-2.09) and retransplantation rates (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 1.03-1.53), lower graft failure-related mortality (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.29-0.74), but higher sepsis-related mortality (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.13-2.06). Meta-regression revealed that a higher proportion of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were associated with significantly superior overall patient survival at 1 (P = 0.044), 3 (P = 0.035) and 5 (P = 0.049) years after LT in NASH compared with non-NASH.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows no difference in posttransplant survival between NASH and non-NASH patients. Carefully selected patients with NASH-related HCC may benefit from LT. NASH recipients should be managed with caution posttransplant, especially regarding the potentially high risk of sepsis-related death.

Peritransplant Renal Dysfunction in Liver Transplant Candidates

Renal function is intricately tied to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and overall prognosis among patients with cirrhosis. The estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and etiology of renal impairment are even more magnified among cirrhotic patients in the period surrounding liver transplantation. Novel biomarkers including cystatin C and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin have been demonstrated to more accurately assess renal dysfunction and aid in the diagnosis of competing etiologies. Accurately identifying the severity and chronicity of renal dysfunction among transplant candidates is an imperative component with respect to stratifying patients toward simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation versus liver transplantation alone.

Chronic Kidney Disease After Liver Transplantation

Improved survival after liver transplantation has led to an aging cohort of recipients at risk of renal dysfunction. The etiology of renal dysfunction is typically multifactorial; calcineurin inhibitors nephrotoxicity, pretransplant renal dysfunction, and perioperative acute kidney injury are important risk factors. Metabolic complications such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease also contribute to the development of renal disease. Most LT recipients will eventually develop some degree of renal dysfunction. Criteria to select candidates for simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation have been established. Both delayed introduction of CNIs and renal-sparing immunosuppressive regimens may reduce progression of renal dysfunction.

The changing impact of pre-liver transplant renal dysfunction on post-transplant survival: results of 2 decades from a single center

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Renal dysfunction before liver transplantation (LT) is associated with higher post-LT mortality. We aimed to study if this association still persisted in the contemporary transplant era.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data on 2871 primary LT performed at our center from 1998 to 2018. All patients were listed for LT alone and were not considered to be simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplant candidates. SLK recipients and those with previous LT were excluded. Patients were grouped into 4 eras: era-1 (1998-2002, n = 488), era-2 (2003-2007, n = 889), era-3 (2008-2012, n = 703) and era-4 (2013-2018, n = 791). Pre-LT renal dysfunction was defined as creatinine (Cr) >1.5 mg/dl or on dialysis at LT. The effect of pre-LT renal dysfunction on post-LT patient survival in each era was examined using Kaplan Meier estimates and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses.

RESULTS

Pre-LT renal dysfunction was present in 594 (20%) recipients. Compared to patients in era-1, patients in era-4 had higher Cr, lower eGFR and were more likely to be on dialysis at LT (P < 0.001). Pre-LT renal dysfunction was associated with worse 1, 3 and 5-year survival in era-1 and era-2 (P < 0.005) but not in era-3 or era-4 (P = 0.13 and P = 0.08, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated the lack of independent effect of pre-LT renal dysfunction on post-LT mortality in era-3 and era-4. A separate analysis using eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² at LT to define renal dysfunction showed similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-LT renal dysfunction had less impact on post-LT survival in the contemporary transplant era.

Post-Liver Transplant Early Allograft Dysfunction Modifies the Effect of Pre-Liver Transplant Renal Dysfunction on Post-Liver Transplant Survival

Pre-liver transplantation (LT) renal dysfunction is associated with poor post-LT survival. We studied whether early allograft dysfunction (EAD) modifies this association. Data on 2,856 primary LT recipients who received a transplant between 1998 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who died within the first post-LT week or received multiorgan transplants and previous LT recipients were excluded. EAD was defined as (1) total bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dL on postoperative day (POD) 7, (2) international normalized ratio ≥1.6 on POD 7, and/or (3) alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase ≥2000 IU/mL in the first postoperative week. Pre-LT renal dysfunction was defined as serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL or on renal replacement therapy at LT. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to pre-LT renal dysfunction and post-LT EAD development. Recipients who had both pre-LT renal dysfunction and post-LT EAD had the worst unadjusted 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year post-LT patient and graft survival, whereas patients who had neither renal dysfunction nor EAD had the best survival (P < 0.001). After adjusting for multiple factors, the risk of death was significantly higher only in those with both pre-LT renal dysfunction and post-LT EAD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-3.03; P < 0.001), whereas those with renal dysfunction and no EAD had a comparable risk of death to those with normal kidney function at LT (aHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.86-1.45; P = 0.41). Results remained unchanged when pre-LT renal dysfunction was redefined using different glomerular filtration rate cutoffs. Pre-LT renal dysfunction negatively impacts post-LT survival only in patients who develop EAD. Livers at higher risk of post-LT EAD should be used with caution in recipients with pre-LT renal dysfunction.

Simultaneous liver kidney allocation policy and the Safety Net: an early examination of utilization and outcomes in the United States

Rates of simultaneous liver kidney (SLK) transplantation in the United States have progressively risen. On 8/10/17, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network implemented a policy defining criteria for SLK, with a "Safety Net" to prioritize kidney allocation to liver recipients with ongoing renal failure. We performed a retrospective review of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database to evaluate policy impact on SLK, kidney after liver (KAL) and kidney transplant alone (KTA). Rates and outcomes of SLK and KAL transplants were compared, as was utilization of high-quality kidney allografts with Kidney Donor Profile Indices (KDPI) <35%. Here, SLK transplants comprised 9.0% and 4.5% of total postpolicy liver and kidney transplants compared to 10.2% and 5.5% prior. Policy enactment did not affect 1-year graft or patient survival for SLK and KAL populations. Less postpolicy SLK transplants utilized high-quality kidney allografts; in all transplant settings, outcomes using high-quality grafts remained stable. These findings suggest that policy implementation has reduced kidney allograft use in SLK transplantation, although both SLK and KAL rates have recently increased. Despite decreased high-quality kidney allograft use, SLK and KAL outcomes have remained stable. Additional studies and long-term follow-up will ensure optimal organ access and sharing.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver and chronic kidney disease: Retrospect, introspect, and prospect

With the growing prevalence of obesity and diabetes in the United States and across the world, a rise in the overall incidence and prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is expected. The risk factors for NAFLD are also associated with the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD). We review the epidemiology, risk factors, genetics, implications of gut dysbiosis, and specific pathogenic mechanisms linking NAFLD to CKD. Mechanisms such as ectopic lipid accumulation, cellular signaling abnormalities, and the interplay between fructose consumption and uric acid accumulation have led to the emergence of potential therapeutic implications for this patient population. Transplant evaluation in the setting of both NAFLD and CKD is also reviewed. Potential strategies for surveillance and management include the monitoring of comorbidities, the use of non-invasive fibrosis scoring systems, and the measurement of laboratory markers. Lastly, we discuss the management of patients with NAFLD and CKD, from preventative measures to experimental interventions.

Outcomes of Liver Transplantation Among Older Recipients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in a Large Multicenter US Cohort: the Re-Evaluating Age Limits in Transplantation Consortium

The liver transplantation (LT) population is aging, with the need for transplant being driven by the growing prevalence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Older LT recipients with NASH may be at an increased risk for adverse outcomes after LT. Our objective is to characterize outcomes in these recipients in a large multicenter cohort. All primary LT recipients ≥65 years from 2010 to 2016 at 13 centers in the Re-Evaluating Age Limits in Transplantation (REALT) consortium were included. Of 1023 LT recipients, 226 (22.1%) were over 70 years old, and 207 (20.2%) had NASH. Compared with other LT recipients, NASH recipients were older (68.0 versus 67.3 years), more likely to be female (47.3% versus 32.8%), White (78.3% versus 68.0%), Hispanic (12.1% versus 9.2%), and had higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium (21 versus 18) at LT (P < 0.05 for all). Specific cardiac risk factors including diabetes with or without chronic complications (69.6%), hypertension (66.3%), hyperlipidemia (46.3%), coronary artery disease (36.7%), and moderate-to-severe renal disease (44.4%) were highly prevalent among NASH LT recipients. Graft survival among NASH patients was 90.3% at 1 year and 82.4% at 3 years compared with 88.9% at 1 year and 80.4% at 3 years for non-NASH patients (log-rank P = 0.58 and P = 0.59, respectively). Within 1 year after LT, the incidence of graft rejection (17.4%), biliary strictures (20.9%), and solid organ cancers (4.9%) were comparable. Rates of cardiovascular (CV) complications, renal failure, and infection were also similar in both groups. We observed similar posttransplant morbidity and mortality outcomes for NASH and non-NASH LT recipients. Certain CV risk factors were more prevalent in this population, although posttransplant outcomes within 1 year including CV events and renal failure were similar to non-NASH LT recipients.

Hospital admission with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with increased all-cause mortality independent of cardiovascular risk factors

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is common and strongly associated with the metabolic syndrome. Though NAFLD may progress to end-stage liver disease, the top cause of mortality in NAFLD is cardiovascular disease (CVD). Most of the data on liver-related mortality in NAFLD derives from specialist liver centres. It is not clear if the higher reported mortality rates in individuals with non-cirrhotic NAFLD are entirely accounted for by complications of atherosclerosis and diabetes. Therefore, we aimed to describe the CVD burden and mortality in NAFLD when adjusting for metabolic risk factors using a ‘real world’ cohort. We performed a retrospective study of patients followed-up after an admission to non-specialist hospitals with a NAFLD-spectrum diagnosis. Non-cirrhotic NAFLD and NAFLD-cirrhosis patients were defined by ICD-10 codes. Cases were age-/sex-matched with non-NAFLD hospitalised patients. All-cause mortality over 14-years follow-up after discharge was compared between groups using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for demographics, CVD, and metabolic syndrome components. We identified 1,802 patients with NAFLD-diagnoses: 1,091 with non-cirrhotic NAFLD and 711 with NAFLD-cirrhosis, matched to 24,737 controls. There was an increasing burden of CVD with progression of NAFLD: for congestive heart failure 3.5% control, 4.2% non-cirrhotic NAFLD, 6.6% NAFLD-cirrhosis; and for atrial fibrillation 4.7% control, 5.9% non-cirrhotic NAFLD, 12.1% NAFLD-cirrhosis. Over 14-years follow-up, crude mortality rates were 14.7% control, 13.7% non-cirrhotic NAFLD, and 40.5% NAFLD-cirrhosis. However, after adjusting for demographics, non-cirrhotic NAFLD (HR 1.3 (95% CI 1.1–1.5)) as well as NAFLD-cirrhosis (HR 3.7 (95% CI 3.0–4.5)) patients had higher mortality compared to controls. These differences remained after adjusting for CVD and metabolic syndrome components: non-cirrhotic NAFLD (HR 1.2 (95% CI 1.0–1.4)) and NAFLD-cirrhosis (HR 3.4 (95% CI 2.8–4.2)). In conclusion, from a large non-specialist registry of hospitalised patients, those with non-cirrhotic NAFLD had increased overall mortality compared to controls even after adjusting for CVD.

Clinical considerations in the management of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis pre- and post-transplant: A multi-system challenge

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, and the fastest growing indication for liver transplantation in the United States. NASH is now the leading etiology for liver transplantation in women, the second leading indication for men, and the most common cause amongst recipients aged 65 years and older. Patients with end-stage liver disease related to NASH represent a unique and challenging patient population due the high incidence of associated comorbid diseases, including obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2D), and hypertension. These challenges manifest in the pre-liver transplantation period with increased waitlist times and waitlist mortality. Furthermore, these patients carry considerable risk of morbidity and mortality both before after liver transplantation, with high rates of T2D, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, poor nutrition, and disease recurrence. Successful transplantation for these patients requires identification and management of their comorbidities in the face of liver failure. Multidisciplinary evaluations include a thorough pre-transplant workup with a complete cardiac evaluation, control of diabetes, nutritional support, and even, potentially, consultation with a bariatric surgeon. This article provides a comprehensive review of the conditions and challenges facing patients with NASH cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation and provides recommendations for evaluation and management to optimize them before liver transplantation to produce successful outcomes.

Longitudinal Renal Function in Liver Transplant Recipients With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

To analyze the impact of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) immediately before liver transplantation (LT) on short-term kidney function.

Chronic Kidney Disease in Liver Transplant Candidates: A Rising Burden Impacting Post-Liver Transplant Outcomes

The burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is rising among patients with cirrhosis, though it is not known what impact this has had on outcomes after liver transplantation (LT). All patients listed for LT in the United States between 2002 and 2017 were analyzed, excluding those listed with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exceptions. The primary outcome was post-LT mortality. We defined pre-LT CKD as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/minute for 90 days or ≥42 days of hemodialysis. Cox regression determined the association between pre-LT CKD and post-LT mortality. Of 78,640 LT candidates, the proportion with CKD among LT recipients increased from 7.8% in 2002 to 14.6% in 2017 (test for trend, P < 0.001). Among the 39,719 LT recipients, pre-LT CKD was significantly associated with post-LT mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; P < 0.001) even after adjusting for donor risk index (DRI), age, MELD, etiology, hepatic encephalopathy, simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT), and diabetes. There was no mediating influence of SLKT on the effect of pre-LT CKD on post-LT survival (P > 0.05). Therefore, pre-LT CKD has a deleterious impact on post-LT outcomes, which is an impact that is not mediated through SLKT. These findings highlight the need for the identification of CKD when preventative measures are possible.

Peri-transplant management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in liver transplant candidates

The incidence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is rapidly growing, affecting 25% of the world population. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the most severe form of NAFLD and affects 1.5% to 6.5% of the world population. Its rising incidence will make end-stage liver disease (ESLD) due to NASH the number one indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the next 10 to 20 years, overtaking Hepatitis C. Patients with NASH also have a high prevalence of associated comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes, obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease (CKD), which must be adequately managed during the peritransplant period for optimal post-transplant outcomes. The focus of this review article is to provide a comprehensive overview of the unique challenges these patients present in the peritransplant period, which comprises the pre-transplant, intraoperative, and immediate postoperative periods.

Extra-Hepatic Manifestations of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Review

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is now the leading cause of chronic liver disease worldwide with a strong association with metabolic syndrome. NAFLD is truly a systemic disease and is associated with a plethora of extra-hepatic manifestations or comorbidities. These are either related to secondary effects of associated obesity or from pathophysiological effects of insulin resistance in NAFLD. Three most common causes of increased morbidity and mortality associated with NAFLD are cardiovascular disease, liver disease, and cancer. In this narrative review, we will discuss comprehensively on cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease and will also highlight on malignancy especially colorectal cancer, pulmonary disorders including obstructive sleep apnea, endocrine disorders such as hypothyroidism and polycystic ovarian syndrome, dermatological disorders especially psoriasis, and hematological associations including iron overload and susceptibility to thrombosis. In addition to focusing on pathogenesis of these extrahepatic manifestations, we will highlight their clinical implications for physicians in routine clinical practice. Further, there remains an unmet need for safe and effective therapies and examining their benefits on these extra-hepatic manifestations among patients with NAFLD.

Liver Transplantation for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Pathophysiology of Recurrence and Clinical Challenges

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the fastest-growing indication for the liver transplant and a leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma among patients listed for liver transplantation in the USA. Post-transplant nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis and steatohepatitis are frequent complications of liver transplantation. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis poses a significant challenge in both pre- and post-transplant period due to its association with metabolic syndrome, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, and obstructive sleep apnea. While optimal therapy is not yet available in the post-liver transplant setting, lifestyle interventions continue to remain as the mainstay of therapy for post-transplant nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Early recognition with protocol biopsies and noninvasive modalities, along with modification of known risk factors, are the most effective methods to curtail the progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the absence of FDA-approved pharmacologic therapy.

Magnitude of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Western Perspective

The incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is continuing to rise worldwide, and it is estimated that this disquieting trend will continue for another 10-15 years before prevalence begins to decrease. NAFLD is the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome. As obesity, diabetes, and other lifestyle-related diseases continue to rise, the spectrum of NAFLD, e.g., nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, liver fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, liver-related morbidity, and mortality, will increase in parallel. Its widespread prevalence and associated economic burden have drawn significant attention, and a multitude of pharmaceutical companies are participating in active research trying to find a "cure". Unfortunately, as of now, no targeted treatment exists to treat this condition, and therefore, emphasis has been on its prevention. The current review focuses on the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of NAFLD in Western countries. It is important to understand the magnitude of NAFLD and its risk factors in Western countries where the prevalence of NAFLD has now reached epidemic proportions to identify the best strategy to prevent and possibly control this epidemic.

Extracellular histones are clinically associated with primary graft dysfunction in human liver transplantation

Extracellular histones have been involved in numerous inflammatory conditions such as ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, trauma, and infection. There is growing evidence of I/R injury associated with primary graft dysfunction (PGD) following organ transplantation. Here we investigated whether extracellular histones are clinically involved with PGD in human liver transplantation. In total 58 patients undergoing liver transplantation were studied. We collected blood samples from the recipients before and serially after transplantation (24 h, 72 h). We measured extracellular histones, myeloperoxidase (MPO), S100A8/A9, and multiple inflammatory cytokines. Additionally, we exposed human L02 hepatocytes or U937 monocytic cells to the recipient's sera overnight, and assessed cellular viability and cytokine production respectively. Lastly, we assessed the effect of histone-targeted interventions by administration of heparin or an anti-histone antibody. It showed that extracellular histones increased immediately after transplantation, peaked within 24 hours and remained at high levels up to 72 hours (all p < 0.01). Notably, extracellular histone levels were significantly higher in recipients with PGD (n = 9) than recipients without PGD (n = 49, p = 0.004). Extracellular histones correlated positively with MPO, S100A8/A9 and most detected cytokines. Ex vivo analysis demonstrated that the patients' sera after graft markedly induced L02 cell death and caused profound cytokine production in cultured U937 cells, which could be abrogated by heparin or an anti-histone antibody. Collectively, extracellular histones were increased significantly after liver transplantation, which may contribute to the occurrence of PGD through direct cytotoxicity and enhancement of systemic inflammation. Targeting extracellular histones may provide a promising approach for preventing PGD or other complications in clinical practice.

Extracellular histones have been involved in numerous inflammatory conditions such as ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, trauma, and infection.