1
|
Li PJ, Shah S, Mehta N. Recent Advances in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024:10.1007/s11864-024-01247-8. [PMID: 39085572 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01247-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains an evolving field. Major challenges HCC transplant patients face today include liver organ donor shortages and the need for both better pre-transplant bridging/downstaging therapies and post-transplant HCC recurrence treatment options. The advent of immunotherapy and the demonstrated efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in multiple solid tumors including advanced/unresectable HCC hold promise in expanding both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant HCC transplant treatment regimen, though caution is needed with these immune modulating agents leading up to and following transplant. New options for pre-transplant HCC management will expand access to this curative option as well as ensure patients have adequate control of their HCC prior to transplant to maximize the utility of a liver donor. Machine perfusion has been an active area of investigation in recent years and could expand the organ donor pool, helping address current liver donor shortages. Finally, additional HCC biomarkers such as AFP-L3 and DCP have shown promise in improving risk stratification of HCC patients. Together, these three recent advancements will likely alter HCC transplant guidelines in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Jonathan Li
- University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, 533 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| | - Sachin Shah
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Neil Mehta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dajti G, Germinario G, Prosperi E, Siniscalchi A, Vasuri F, Valente S, Odaldi F, Maroni L, Serenari M, Bertuzzo V, Laurenzi A, Del Gaudio M, Cescon M, Ravaioli M. The role of cold ischemia time and hypothermic perfusion in predicting early hepatocellular carcinoma recurrences after liver transplantation. Artif Organs 2024; 48:619-625. [PMID: 38270476 DOI: 10.1111/aor.14715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
AIM The aim of the study was to identify predictors of early tumor recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT). METHODS Retrospective cohort study in 237 consecutive liver recipients with HCC between 2016 and 2021. Multivariate logistic analysis was performed to identify predictors of early HCC recurrences. The impact of hypothermic-oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) on outcome was analyzed after propensity score weighting. RESULTS Early recurrences were observed in 15 cases. Microvascular invasion (OR 3.737, 95% CI 1.246-11.206, p = 0.019) and cold ischemia time (OR 1.155, 95% CI 1.001-1.333, p = 0.049) were independently associated with a lower risk of HCC recurrences. After balancing for relevant variables, patients in the HOPE group had lower rates of tumor recurrence (weighted OR 0.126, 95% CI 0.016-0.989, p = 0.049) and higher recurrence free survival (weighted HR 0.132, 95% CI 0.017-0.999, p = 0.050). CONCLUSION Reducing cold ischemia time and graft perfusion with HOPE can lead to lower rates of early HCC recurrences and higher recurrence-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerti Dajti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuliana Germinario
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Enrico Prosperi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonio Siniscalchi
- Intensive Care Unit, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Vasuri
- Department of Specialized, Experimental and Diagnostic Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sabrina Valente
- Department of Specialized, Experimental and Diagnostic Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Federica Odaldi
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Maroni
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Serenari
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Valentina Bertuzzo
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Laurenzi
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Massimo Del Gaudio
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Ravaioli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wehrle CJ, Raj R, Maspero M, Satish S, Eghtesad B, Pita A, Kim J, Khalil M, Calderon E, Orabi D, Zervos B, Modaresi Esfeh J, Whitsett Linganna M, Diago-Uso T, Fujiki M, Quintini C, Kwon CD, Miller C, Pinna A, Aucejo F, Hashimoto K, Schlegel A. Risk assessment in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term follow-up of a two-centre experience. Int J Surg 2024; 110:2818-2831. [PMID: 38241354 PMCID: PMC11093438 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation (LT) is a well-established treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but there are ongoing debates regarding outcomes and selection. This study examines the experience of LT for HCC at a high-volume centre. METHODS A prospectively maintained database was used to identify HCC patients undergoing LT from 2000 to 2020 with more than or equal to 3-years follow-up. Data were obtained from the centre database and electronic medical records. The Metroticket 2.0 HCC-specific 5-year survival scale was calculated for each patient. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analyses were employed assessing survival between groups based on Metroticket score and individual donor and recipient risk factors. RESULTS Five hundred sixty-nine patients met criteria. Median follow-up was 96.2 months (8.12 years; interquartile range 59.9-147.8). Three-year recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 88.6% ( n =504) and 86.6% ( n =493). Five-year RFS and OS were 78.9% ( n =449) and 79.1% ( n =450). Median Metroticket 2.0 score was 0.9 (interquartile range 0.9-0.95). Tumour size greater than 3 cm ( P =0.012), increasing tumour number on imaging ( P =0.001) and explant pathology ( P <0.001) was associated with recurrence. Transplant within Milan ( P <0.001) or UCSF criteria ( P <0.001) had lower recurrence rates. Increasing alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-values were associated with more HCC recurrence ( P <0.001) and reduced OS ( P =0.008). Chemoembolization was predictive of recurrence in the overall population ( P =0.043) and in those outside-Milan criteria ( P =0.038). A receiver-operator curve using Metroticket 2.0 identified an optimal cut-off of projected survival greater than or equal to 87.5% for predicting recurrence. This cut-off was able to predict RFS ( P <0.001) in the total cohort and predict both, RFS ( P =0.007) and OS ( P =0.016) outside Milan. Receipt of donation after brain death (DBD) grafts (55/478, 13%) or living-donor grafts (3/22, 13.6%) experienced better survival rates compared to donation after cardiac death (DCD) grafts ( n =15/58, 25.6%, P =0.009). Donor age was associated with a higher HCC recurrence ( P =0.006). Both total ischaemia time (TIT) greater than 6hours ( P =0.016) and increasing TIT correlated with higher HCC recurrence ( P =0.027). The use of DCD grafts for outside-Milan candidates was associated with increased recurrence ( P =0.039) and reduced survival ( P =0.033). CONCLUSION This large two-centre analysis confirms favourable outcomes after LT for HCC. Tumour size and number, pre-transplant AFP, and Milan criteria remain important recipient HCC-risk factors. A higher donor risk (i.e. donor age, DCD grafts, ischaemia time) was associated with poorer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chase J. Wehrle
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Roma Raj
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Marianna Maspero
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Sangeeta Satish
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Bijan Eghtesad
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Alejandro Pita
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Jaekeun Kim
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Mazhar Khalil
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Esteban Calderon
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Danny Orabi
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Bobby Zervos
- Cleveland Clinic Weston Hospital, Department of Liver Transplantation, Weston, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Teresa Diago-Uso
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Masato Fujiki
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Cristiano Quintini
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Choon David Kwon
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Charles Miller
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Antonio Pinna
- Cleveland Clinic Weston Hospital, Department of Liver Transplantation, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Federico Aucejo
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Koji Hashimoto
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
| | - Andrea Schlegel
- Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute
- Department of Immunology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu H, Sethi V, Li X, Xiao Y, Humar A. Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review and A Glimpse into The Future. Semin Liver Dis 2024; 44:79-98. [PMID: 38211621 DOI: 10.1055/a-2242-7543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is a highly effective treatment for carefully selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this review, we explored the development of LT selection criteria and organ allocation policies, comparing original data to underscore their historical progression into the intricate task of quantitatively estimating pre- and post-LT survivals. We emphasized the role of biomarkers such as serum alpha-fetoprotein, Des-gamma-carboxy-prothrombin, circulating tumor cells, and circulating tumor DNA in predicting patient outcomes. Additionally, we examined the transplant-associated survival benefits and the difficulties in accurately calculating these benefits. We also reviewed recent advancements in targeted therapy and checkpoint inhibitors for advanced, inoperable HCC and projected their integration into LT for HCC. We further discussed the growing use of living donor liver transplants in the United States and compared its outcomes with those of deceased donor liver transplants. Furthermore, we examined the progress in machine perfusion techniques, which have shown potential in improving patient outcomes and enlarging the donor pool. These advancements present opportunities to enhance LT patient survivals, refine selection criteria, establish new priority metrics, develop innovative bridging and downstaging strategies, and formulate redesigned LT strategies for HCC treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Liu
- Department of Surgery, Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Vrishketan Sethi
- Department of Surgery, Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Xingjie Li
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Yao Xiao
- Division of Transplant Surgery and Transplant Surgery Research Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Abhinav Humar
- Department of Surgery, Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ruch B, Kumm K, Arias S, Katariya NN, Mathur AK. Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation: Early Challenges, Clinical Improvement, and Future Directions. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:27-44. [PMID: 37953039 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver allografts remain a widely underutilized source of donor organs for transplantation. Although initially linked with inferior outcomes, DCD liver transplant can achieve excellent patient and graft survival with suitable matching of donor and recipient characteristics, rapid donor recovery and precise donor assessment, and appropriate perioperative management. The advent of clinical liver perfusion modalities promises to redefine the viability parameters for DCD liver allografts and hopefully will encourage more widespread usage of this growing source of donor livers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brianna Ruch
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA. https://twitter.com/BriannaCRuch
| | - Kayla Kumm
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA. https://twitter.com/Kayla_Kumm
| | - Sandra Arias
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Nitin N Katariya
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA. https://twitter.com/nnk_tx_hpb
| | - Amit K Mathur
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Maspero M, Yilmaz S, Cazzaniga B, Raj R, Ali K, Mazzaferro V, Schlegel A. The role of ischaemia-reperfusion injury and liver regeneration in hepatic tumour recurrence. JHEP Rep 2023; 5:100846. [PMID: 37771368 PMCID: PMC10523008 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The risk of cancer recurrence after liver surgery mainly depends on tumour biology, but preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that the degree of perioperative liver injury plays a role in creating a favourable microenvironment for tumour cell engraftment or proliferation of dormant micro-metastases. Understanding the contribution of perioperative liver injury to tumour recurrence is imperative, as these pathways are potentially actionable. In this review, we examine the key mechanisms of perioperative liver injury, which comprise mechanical handling and surgical stress, ischaemia-reperfusion injury, and parenchymal loss leading to liver regeneration. We explore how these processes can trigger downstream cascades leading to the activation of the immune system and the pro-inflammatory response, cellular proliferation, angiogenesis, anti-apoptotic signals, and release of circulating tumour cells. Finally, we discuss the novel therapies under investigation to decrease ischaemia-reperfusion injury and increase regeneration after liver surgery, including pharmaceutical agents, inflow modulation, and machine perfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Maspero
- Transplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Sumeyye Yilmaz
- Transplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Beatrice Cazzaniga
- Transplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Roma Raj
- Transplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Khaled Ali
- Transplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Schlegel
- Transplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Immunology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Al-Ameri AAM, Zhou Z, Zheng S. Comparative Analysis of Donor Liver Allograft Outcomes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Who Underwent Liver Transplant. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2023; 21:664-670. [PMID: 37698401 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2023.0119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma involves 3 main types of donor allografts: donation after brain death, donation after cardiac death, and donation after brain and cardiac death. Data on this topic are limited, and controversies exist regarding liver transplant outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients who have received these allografts. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from 490 hepatocellular carcinoma patients who received liver transplant from 2015 to 2021 at the Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Participants were divided into 3 cohorts according to allograft type: donation after brain death, donation after cardiac death, and donation after brain and cardiac death. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used to evaluate patient survival, graft survival, and recurrence-free survival rates after liver transplant. RESULTS Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that 3-year patient survival rates were 69.2% for donations after brain death, 69.2% for donations after cardiac death, and 46.6% for donations after brain and cardiac death (P = .42); the 3-year graft survival rates were 53.3% for donations after brain death, 56.4% for donations after cardiac death, and 46.6% for donations after brain and cardiac death (P = .44); and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were 55% for donations after brain death, 56.6% for donations after cardiac death, and 39.5% for donations after brain and cardiac death (P = .46). Complications were also similar across the 3 cohorts (P = .36). Multivariable analysis showed that intraoperative red blood cell transfusion (hazard ratio: 1.820; P = .042) and early allograft dysfunction (hazard ratio: 3.240; P = .041) were independent risk factors for graft survival. CONCLUSIONS Similar outcomes can be achieved for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who undergo liver transplant with donations after brain death, donations after cardiac death, or donations after brain and cardiac death allografts, especially when strict donor selection criteria are applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulahad Abdulrab Mohammed Al-Ameri
- >From the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, China; and the NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, the Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Research Unit of Collaborative Diagnosis and Treatment For Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and the Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Research Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rigo F, De Stefano N, Patrono D, De Donato V, Campi L, Turturica D, Doria T, Sciannameo V, Berchialla P, Tandoi F, Romagnoli R. Impact of Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence after Liver Transplantation. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13050703. [PMID: 37240873 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13050703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Machine perfusion may be able to mitigate ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), which increases hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). This study aimed to investigate the impact of dual-hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (D-HOPE) on HCC recurrence in LT. METHODS A single-center retrospective study was conducted from 2016 to 2020. Pre- and postoperative data of HCC patients undergoing LT were analyzed. Recipients of a D-HOPE-treated graft were compared to those of livers preserved using static cold storage (SCS). The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS Of 326 patients, 246 received an SCS-preserved liver and 80 received a D-HOPE-treated graft (donation after brain death (DBD), n = 66; donation after circulatory death (DCD), n = 14). Donors of D-HOPE-treated grafts were older and had higher BMI. All DCD donors were treated by normothermic regional perfusion and D-HOPE. The groups were comparable in terms of HCC features and estimated 5-year RFS according to the Metroticket 2.0 model. D-HOPE did not reduce HCC recurrence (D-HOPE 10%; SCS 8.9%; p = 0.95), which was confirmed using Bayesian model averaging and inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted RFS analysis. Postoperative outcomes were comparable between groups, except for lower AST and ALT peak in the D-HOPE group. CONCLUSIONS In this single-center study, D-HOPE did not reduce HCC recurrence but allowed utilizing livers from extended criteria donors with comparable outcomes, improving access to LT for patients suffering from HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Rigo
- General Surgery 2U-Liver Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Nicola De Stefano
- General Surgery 2U-Liver Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Damiano Patrono
- General Surgery 2U-Liver Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Victor De Donato
- General Surgery 2U-Liver Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Ludovico Campi
- General Surgery 2U-Liver Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Diana Turturica
- General Surgery 2U-Liver Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Teresa Doria
- General Surgery 2U-Liver Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Veronica Sciannameo
- Centre for Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health (C-BEPH), Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Paola Berchialla
- Centre for Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health (C-BEPH), Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Tandoi
- General Surgery 2U-Liver Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Renato Romagnoli
- General Surgery 2U-Liver Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Huang AC, Dodge JL, Yao FY, Mehta N. National Experience on Waitlist Outcomes for Down-Staging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: High Dropout Rate in All-Comers. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 21:1581-1589. [PMID: 36038129 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) grants priority listing for liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after successful down-staging to Milan criteria. We evaluated the national experience on down-staging by comparing 2 down-staging groups: tumor burden meeting UNOS down-staging (UNOS-DS) inclusion criteria, and all-comers (AC)-DS with initial tumor burden beyond UNOS-DS criteria vs patients always within Milan criteria. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of the UNOS database of 23,398 patients listed for liver transplant who had submitted a hepatocellular carcinoma Model for End-Stage Liver Disease exception application from 2010 to 2019, classified as always within Milan (n = 20,579), UNOS-DS (n = 2151), and AC-DS (n = 668). RESULTS The 2-year cumulative probabilities of dropout were 19% for Milan, 25% for UNOS-DS (P < .001), and 30% for AC-DS (P < .001). In multivariate analysis of the down-staging groups, factors predicting dropout included Model for End-Stage Liver Disease at listing (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; P < .001) and initial total tumor diameter (HR, 1.04; P = .002). Compared with α-fetoprotein (AFP) level ≤20 ng/mL, AFP levels of 21 to 100, 101 to 1000, and greater than 1000 ng/mL were associated with a higher risk of dropout (HRs, 1.63, 2.06, and 4.58, respectively; P < .001). A subset of all-comers with AFP levels greater than 100 ng/mL had a 2-year probability of dropout of 52% vs 26% for all others beyond Milan criteria (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS All-comers had a significantly higher risk for waitlist dropout compared with the UNOS-DS and Milan groups after initial successful down-staging to Milan criteria. In particular, the subgroup of AC-DS with an AFP level greater than 100 ng/mL had a greater than 50% probability of dropout in the next 2 years. These observations suggest a high likelihood of failure when expanding the indications for down-staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annsa C Huang
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jennifer L Dodge
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Francis Y Yao
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Neil Mehta
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Parente A, Flores Carvalho M, Eden J, Dutkowski P, Schlegel A. Mitochondria and Cancer Recurrence after Liver Transplantation—What Is the Benefit of Machine Perfusion? Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23179747. [PMID: 36077144 PMCID: PMC9456431 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23179747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor recurrence after liver transplantation has been linked to multiple factors, including the recipient’s tumor burden, donor factors, and ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). The increasing number of livers accepted from extended criteria donors has forced the transplant community to push the development of dynamic perfusion strategies. The reason behind this progress is the urgent need to reduce the clinical consequences of IRI. Two concepts appear most beneficial and include either the avoidance of ischemia, e.g., the replacement of cold storage by machine perfusion, or secondly, an endischemic organ improvement through perfusion in the recipient center prior to implantation. While several concepts, including normothermic perfusion, were found to reduce recipient transaminase levels and early allograft dysfunction, hypothermic oxygenated perfusion also reduced IRI-associated post-transplant complications and costs. With the impact on mitochondrial injury and subsequent less IRI-inflammation, this endischemic perfusion was also found to reduce the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Firstly, this article highlights the contributing factors to tumor recurrence, including the surgical and medical tissue trauma and underlying mechanisms of IRI-associated inflammation. Secondly, it focuses on the role of mitochondria and associated interventions to reduce cancer recurrence. Finally, the role of machine perfusion technology as a delivery tool and as an individual treatment is discussed together with the currently available clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Parente
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
| | - Mauricio Flores Carvalho
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Centre of Preclinical Research, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Janina Eden
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Centre, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Dutkowski
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Centre, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Schlegel
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Centre of Preclinical Research, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Centre, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Reddy SHS, Mehta N, Dodge JL, Hakeem AR, Khorsandi SE, Jassem W, Vilca-Melendez H, Cortes-Cerisuelo M, Srinivasan P, Prachalias A, Heneghan MA, Aluvihare V, Suddle A, Miquel R, Rela M, Heaton ND, Menon KV. Liver transplantation for HCC: validation of prognostic power of the RETREAT score for recurrence in a UK cohort. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:596-605. [PMID: 34702624 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT) score as a prognostic index for recurrence has been reported previously and has not been validated outside the USA. Our study has validated the score in a single center UK cohort of patients being transplanted for HCC. METHODS LT for HCC between 2008 and 2018 at our center were analyzed. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared by the RETREAT score and validated using Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) by comparing it to Milan criteria. RESULTS 346 adult HCC patients were transplanted of whom 313 were included. 28 (8.9%) had a recurrence. Summation of largest diameter and total number of viable tumors (HR = 1.19, p < 0.001), micro-/macro-vascular invasion (HR = 3.74, p = 0.002) and AFP>20 ng/ml (HR = 3.03, p = 0.005) were associated with recurrence on multivariate analysis. RFS decreased with increasing RETREAT score (log-rank p = 0.016). RETREAT performed better than Milan with significant NRI at 1- and 2-years post-transplant (0.43 (p = 0.004) and 0.38 (p = 0.03) respectively). CONCLUSION LT outcomes using the revised UK criteria are equivalent to Milan criteria. Further, RETREAT score was validated as a prognostic index for the first time in a UK cohort and may assist risk stratification, selection for adjuvant therapies and guide surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shruthi H S Reddy
- Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
| | - Neil Mehta
- Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Jennifer L Dodge
- Biostatistics, Department of Medicine and Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Abdul R Hakeem
- Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS97TF, United Kingdom
| | - Shirin E Khorsandi
- Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom; Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wayel Jassem
- Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
| | - Hector Vilca-Melendez
- Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
| | - Miriam Cortes-Cerisuelo
- Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
| | - Parthi Srinivasan
- Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Prachalias
- Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
| | - Michael A Heneghan
- Hepatology, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Varuna Aluvihare
- Hepatology, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Abid Suddle
- Hepatology, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rosa Miquel
- Liver Histopathology, Department of Histopathology, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mohamed Rela
- Liver Transplant and HPB Surgery, Dr Rela Institute & Medical Center, Chennai, India
| | - Nigel D Heaton
- Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
| | - Krishna V Menon
- Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wallace D, Cowling TE, Suddle A, Gimson A, Rowe I, Callaghan C, Sapisochin G, Ivanics T, Claasen M, Mehta N, Heaton N, van der Meulen J, Walker K. National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors. Br J Surg 2021; 109:79-88. [PMID: 34738095 PMCID: PMC10364702 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite high waiting list mortality rates, concern still exists on the appropriateness of using livers donated after circulatory death (DCD). We compared mortality and graft loss in recipients of livers donated after circulatory or brainstem death (DBD) across two successive time periods. METHODS Observational multinational data from the United Kingdom and Ireland were partitioned into two time periods (2008-2011 and 2012-2016). Cox regression methods were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) comparing the impact of periods on post-transplant mortality and graft failure. RESULTS A total of 1176 DCD recipients and 3749 DBD recipients were included. Three-year patient mortality rates decreased markedly from 19.6 per cent in time period 1 to 10.4 per cent in time period 2 (adjusted HR 0.43, 95 per cent c.i. 0.30 to 0.62; P < 0.001) for DCD recipients but only decreased from 12.8 to 11.3 per cent (adjusted HR 0.96, 95 per cent c.i. 0.78 to 1.19; P = 0.732) in DBD recipients (P for interaction = 0.001). No time period-specific improvements in 3-year graft failure were observed for DCD (adjusted HR 0.80, 95% c.i. 0.61 to 1.05; P = 0.116) or DBD recipients (adjusted HR 0.95, 95% c.i. 0.79 to 1.14; P = 0.607). A slight increase in retransplantation rates occurred between time period 1 and 2 in those who received a DCD liver (from 7.3 to 11.8 per cent; P = 0.042), but there was no change in those receiving a DBD liver (from 4.9 to 4.5 per cent; P = 0.365). In time period 2, no difference in mortality rates between those receiving a DCD liver and those receiving a DBD liver was observed (adjusted HR 0.78, 95% c.i. 0.56 to 1.09; P = 0.142). CONCLUSION Mortality rates more than halved in recipients of a DCD liver over a decade and eventually compared similarly to mortality rates in recipients of a DBD liver. Regions with high waiting list mortality may mitigate this by use of DCD livers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Wallace
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Thomas E Cowling
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Abid Suddle
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alex Gimson
- The Liver Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ian Rowe
- Liver Unit, St James' Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK/Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Chris Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Renal Unit, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Multi-Organ Transplant, Toronto General Surgery, Toronto, Canada.,Department of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tommy Ivanics
- Multi-Organ Transplant, Toronto General Surgery, Toronto, Canada.,Department of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marco Claasen
- Multi-Organ Transplant, Toronto General Surgery, Toronto, Canada.,Department of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Neil Mehta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Nigel Heaton
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jan van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kate Walker
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schlegel A, Foley DP, Savier E, Flores Carvalho M, De Carlis L, Heaton N, Taner CB. Recommendations for Donor and Recipient Selection and Risk Prediction: Working Group Report From the ILTS Consensus Conference in DCD Liver Transplantation. Transplantation 2021; 105:1892-1903. [PMID: 34416750 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Although the utilization of donation after circulatory death donors (DCDs) for liver transplantation (LT) has increased steadily, much controversy remains, and no common acceptance criteria exist with regard to donor and recipient risk factors and prediction models. A consensus conference was organized by International Liver Transplantation Society on January 31, 2020, in Venice, Italy, to review the current clinical practice worldwide regarding DCD-LT and to develop internationally accepted guidelines. The format of the conference was based on the grade system. International experts in this field were allocated to 6 working groups and prepared evidence-based recommendations to answer-specific questions considering the currently available literature. Working group members and conference attendees served as jury to edit and confirm the final recommendations presented at the end of the conference by each working group separately. This report presents the final statements and recommendations provided by working group 2, covering the entire spectrum of donor and recipient risk factors and prediction models in DCD-LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Schlegel
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - David P Foley
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, William S. Middleton VA Medical Center, Madison, WI
| | - Eric Savier
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Sorbonne Université Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Mauricio Flores Carvalho
- Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Nigel Heaton
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - C Burcin Taner
- Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Methods of Attenuating Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22158229. [PMID: 34360995 PMCID: PMC8347959 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22158229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 07/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequent indications for liver transplantation. However, the transplantation is ultimately associated with the occurrence of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). It affects not only the function of the graft but also significantly worsens the oncological results. Various methods have been used so far to manage IRI. These include the non-invasive approach (pharmacotherapy) and more advanced options encompassing various types of liver conditioning and machine perfusion. Strategies aimed at shortening ischemic times and better organ allocation pathways are still under development as well. This article presents the mechanisms responsible for IRI, its impact on treatment outcomes, and strategies to mitigate it. An extensive review of the relevant literature using MEDLINE (PubMed) and Scopus databases until September 2020 was conducted. Only full-text articles written in English were included. The following search terms were used: “ischemia reperfusion injury”, “liver transplantation”, “hepatocellular carcinoma”, “preconditioning”, “machine perfusion”.
Collapse
|
15
|
Kriss M, Biggins SW. Evaluation and selection of the liver transplant candidate: updates on a dynamic and evolving process. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2021; 26:52-61. [PMID: 33278150 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Although conceptually unchanged, the evaluation and selection of the liver transplant candidate has seen significant recent advances. Expanding criteria for transplant candidacy, improved diagnostics for risk stratification and advances in prognostic models have paralleled recent changes in allocation and distribution that require us to revisit core concepts of candidate evaluation and selection while recognizing its now dynamic and continuous nature. RECENT FINDINGS The liver transplant evaluation revolves around three interrelated themes: candidate selection, donor selection and transplant outcome. Introduction of dynamic frailty indices, bariatric surgery at the time of liver transplant in obese patients and improved therapies and prognostic tools for hepatobiliary malignancy have transformed candidate selection. Advances in hypothermic organ preservation have improved outcomes in marginal donor organs. Combined with expansion of hepatitis C virus positive and split donor organs, donor selection has become an integral part of candidate evaluation. In addition, with liver transplant for acute alcohol-related hepatitis now widely performed and increasing recognition of acute-on-chronic liver failure, selection of critically ill patients is refining tools to balance futility versus utility. SUMMARY Advances in liver transplant candidate evaluation continue to transform the evaluation process and require continued incorporation into our clinical practice amidst a dynamic backdrop of demographic and policy changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Kriss
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Scott W Biggins
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Center for Liver Investigation Fostering discovEry (C-LIFE), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lee DD, Cotler SJ. Finding the Right Balance for the Use of Donation After Circulatory Death Livers for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Liver Transpl 2020; 26:1081-1082. [PMID: 32563205 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David D Lee
- Division of Intra-Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University of Chicago, Maywood, IL
| | - Scott J Cotler
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University of Chicago, Maywood, IL
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Boteon Y, Flores Carvalho MA, Panconesi R, Muiesan P, Schlegel A. Preventing Tumour Recurrence after Liver Transplantation: The Role of Machine Perfusion. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E5791. [PMID: 32806712 PMCID: PMC7460879 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21165791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumour recurrence is currently a hot topic in liver transplantation. The basic mechanisms are increasingly discussed, and, for example, recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma is often described in pre-injured donor livers, which frequently suffer from significant ischemia/reperfusion injury. This review article highlights the underlying mechanisms and describes the specific tissue milieu required to promote tumour recurrence after liver transplantation. We summarise the current literature in this field and show risk factors that contribute to a pro-tumour-recurrent environment. Finally, the potential role of new machine perfusion technology is discussed, including the most recent data, which demonstrate a protective effect of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion before liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuri Boteon
- Liver Unit, Albert Einstein Hospital, 05652–900 São Paulo, Brazil;
- Albert Einstein Jewish Institute for Education and Research, 05652–900 São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mauricio Alfredo Flores Carvalho
- Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, AOU Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy; (M.A.F.C.); (R.P.); (P.M.)
| | - Rebecca Panconesi
- Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, AOU Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy; (M.A.F.C.); (R.P.); (P.M.)
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, AOU Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy; (M.A.F.C.); (R.P.); (P.M.)
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Andrea Schlegel
- Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, AOU Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy; (M.A.F.C.); (R.P.); (P.M.)
| |
Collapse
|