Hepatitis C virus genotypes and quantitation of serum hepatitis C virus RNA in liver transplant recipients: relationship with severity of histological recurrence and implications in the pathogenesis of HCV infection

Association of rs12979860 and rs8099917 polymorphisms near IL28B with SVR in hepatic allograft recipients with HCV recurrence undergoing PEG-IFN/RBV therapy: a meta-analysis

The association of rs12979860 and rs8099917 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) near IL28B with sustained virological response (SVR) in hepatic allograft recipients undergoing treatment with PEGylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) for recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains inconclusive. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to estimate this association. A search of the literature published prior to November 1, 2013, was conducted using various databases. Eleven eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results revealed that rs12979860 genotype CC in the recipient, donor, and recipient/donor pair was significantly related to high SVR in the recipients (recipient: odds ratio [OR]=3.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.18-4.30; donor: OR=2.65, 95% CI=1.83-3.85; recipient/donor pair: OR=6.05, 95% CI=3.16-11.58). A similar association was observed with rs8099917 genotype TT (recipient: OR=3.84, 95% CI=2.37-6.22; donor: OR=2.44, 95% CI=1.12-5.28; recipient/donor pair: OR=5.43, 95% CI=2.51-11.75). These results suggest that rs12979860 genotype CC and rs8099917 genotype TT contribute to a high SVR in the recipient after antiviral treatment.

Post-liver transplant hepatitis C virus recurrence: an unresolved thorny problem

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis represents the leading cause of liver transplantation in developed, Western and Eastern countries. Unfortunately, liver transplantation does not cure recipient HCV infection: reinfection universally occurs and disease progression is faster after liver transplant. In this review we focus on what happens throughout the peri-transplant phase and in the first 6-12 mo after transplantation: during this crucial period a completely new balance between HCV, liver graft, the recipient's immune response and anti-rejection therapy is achieved that will deeply affect subsequent outcomes. Nearly all patients show an early graft reinfection, with HCV viremia reaching and exceeding pre-transplant levels; in this setting, histological assessment is essential to differentiate recurrent hepatitis C from acute or chronic rejection; however, differentiating the two patterns remains difficult. The host immune response (mainly cellular mediated) appears to be crucial both in the control of HCV infection and in the genesis of rejection, and it is also strongly influenced by immunosuppressive treatment. At present no clear immunosuppressive strategy could be strongly recommended in HCV-positive recipients to prevent HCV recurrence, even immunotherapy appears to be ineffective. Nonetheless it seems reasonable that episodes of rejection and over-immunosuppression are more likely to enhance the risk of HCV recurrence through immunological mechanisms. Both complete prevention of rejection and optimization of immunosuppression should represent the main goals towards reducing the rate of graft HCV reinfection. In conclusion, post-transplant HCV recurrence remains an unresolved, thorny problem because many factors remain obscure and need to be better determined.

New insights in recurrent HCV infection after liver transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a small-enveloped RNA virus belonging to the Flaviviridae family. Since first identified in 1989, HCV has been estimated to infect 170 million people worldwide. Mostly chronic hepatitis C virus has a uniform natural history, from liver cirrhosis to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. The current therapy for HCV infection consists of a combination of Pegylated interferon and ribavirin. On the other hand, HCV-related liver disease is also the leading indication for liver transplantation. However, posttransplant HCV re-infection of the graft has been reported to be universal. Furthermore, the graft after HCV re-infection often results in accelerated progression to liver failure. In addition, treatment of recurrent HCV infection after liver transplantation is often compromised by enhanced adverse effects and limited efficacy of interferon-based therapies. Taken together, poor outcome after HCV re-infection, regardless of grafts or recipients, poses a major issue for the hepatologists and transplant surgeons. The aim of this paper is to review several specific aspects regarding HCV re-infection after transplant: risk factors, current therapeutics for HCV in different stages of liver transplantation, cellular function of HCV proteins, and molecular mechanisms of HCV entry. Hopefully, this paper will inspire new strategies and novel inhibitors against recurrent HCV infection after liver transplantation and greatly improve its overall outcome.

Development of hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients with chronic hepatitis C with or without elevated aspartate and alanine aminotransferase levels

OBJECTIVE

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the elderly infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is expected to increase globally within the next two decades. The purpose of the study was to define the natural history of elderly patients with chronic hepatitis C needs in order to prevent HCC from arising in these patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Treatment-naive patients aged >or=65 years with platelet counts >120 x 10(3)/mm(3) were classified as 120 with aspartate and alanine aminotransferase (ASAT and ALAT) levels <or=40 IU/l (group A) and 212 with either or both levels >or=41 (group B) and followed-up for 3 years or longer without antiviral treatment.

RESULTS

Cirrhosis and HCC developed more frequently in group B than in group A (p<0.001 for both). In particular, of the patients aged 65-69 years at entry, cirrhosis and HCC developed more frequently in group B than in group A (p<0.001 and p=0.001, respectively). Liver-related causes of death were more common in group B than in group A (20/34 (59%) versus 1/9 (11%), p=0.021). HCC developed more frequently in men than in women (p=0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly patients with chronic hepatitis C, cirrhosis and HCC develop more frequently in those with elevated transaminase levels than in those without elevated transaminase levels. Therefore, transaminase levels need to be suppressed below <or=40 IU/l, using antiviral treatments or other agents, in order to prevent cirrhosis and HCC arising in these patients. In view of rare liver-related deaths, aggressive antiviral treatment would not be necessary in the elderly with chronic hepatitis C who have normal transaminase levels.

Poor response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin in older women infected with hepatitis C virus of genotype 1b in high viral loads

BACKGROUND

Response to treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C, with reference to age and gender, has not been examined fully.

AIM

The influence of gender and age on treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin was evaluated in a retrospective study.

METHODS

PEG-IFN and ribavirin were given for 48 weeks to 179 men and 121 women infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) of genotype 1b in high viral loads (>100 kIU/ml).

RESULTS

Sustained virological response at 24 weeks after treatment was poorer in women than men who were aged >or=50 years (22% vs 53%, P < 0.001). Among the patients aged >or=50 years who had received >or=80% of the doses of PEG-IFN, ribavirin, or both, women responded less often than men (26% vs 64%, P < 0.001; 33% vs 61%, P = 0.022; and 32% vs 63%, P = 0.016; respectively). In multivariate analysis, male gender, retention of indocyanine green, ribavirin dose and compliance with therapy increased sustained virological response.

CONCLUSIONS

Response to combined PEG-IFN and ribavirin is poorer in female than male patients with hepatitis C who are aged >or=50 years, irrespective of compliance with treatment. Low estrogen levels in older women could be responsible for their impaired response to PEG-IFN and ribavirin.

Effect of nonviral factors on hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Hepatitis C (HCV) is now the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). While graft reinfection remains universal, progression to graft cirrhosis is highly variable. This study examined donor, recipient, and operative variables to identify factors that affect recurrence of HCV post-OLT to facilitate graft-recipient matching.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 307 patients who underwent OLT for HCV over a 10-year period at our center. Recurrence of HCV was identified by the presence of biochemical graft dysfunction and concurrent liver biopsy showing diagnostic pathologic features. Time to recurrence was the endpoint for statistical analysis. Five donor, 6 recipient, and 2 operative variables that may affect recurrence were analyzed by univariate comparison and Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS

Recurrence-free survival in the 307 study patients was 69% and 34% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Four predictive variables related to either donor or recipient characteristics were identified. Advanced donor age, prolonged donor hospitalization, increasing recipient age, and elevated recipient MELD scores were found to increase the relative risk of HCV recurrence. Examination of HLA disparity between donors and recipients demonstrated no correlation between class I or class II mismatches and recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified donor and recipient characteristics that significantly predict hepatitis C recurrence following liver transplantation. These factors are identifiable before transplant and, if considered when matching donors to HCV recipients, may decrease the incidence of HCV recurrence after OLT. A change in the current national liver allocation system would be needed to realize the full value of this benefit.

Detection of HCV antigens in liver graft: relevance to the management of recurrent post-liver transplant hepatitis C

The aim of this study was to evaluate how the immunohistochemical detection of liver hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigens (HCV-Ag) could support the histologic diagnosis and influence the clinical management of post-liver transplantation (LT) liver disease. A total of 215 liver specimens from 152 HCV-positive patients with post-LT liver disease were studied. Histologic coding was: hepatitis (126), rejection (34), undefined (24; coexisting rejection grade I and hepatitis), or other (31). The percentage of HCV-Ag infected hepatocytes were evaluated, on frozen sections, by an immunoperoxidase technique. HCV-Ag were detectable early in 57% of cases within 30 days post-LT, 92% of cases between 31 and 180 days, and 74% of cases after more than 180 days. Overall, HCV-Ag were detected more frequently in histologic hepatitis as compared to rejection (P < 0.0001) with a higher percentage of positive hepatocytes (P < 0.00001). In 16 patients with a high number of HCV-Ag-positive hepatocytes (65%; range 40-90%) a clinical diagnosis of recurrent hepatitis (RHC) was made despite inconclusive histopathologic diagnosis. Multivariate analysis identified the percentage of HCV-Ag-positive hepatocytes and the time post-LT as independent predictors for RHC (P = 0.008 and P = 0.041, respectively) and the number of HCV-Ag-positive hepatocytes >/=50% as the only independent predictor for nonresponse (P < 0.001) in 26 patients treated with alpha-interferon plus ribavirin. In conclusion, HCV reinfection occurs early post-LT, reaching its peak within 6 months. Immunohistochemical detection of post-LT HCV reinfection support the diagnosis of hepatitis when the histologic features are not conclusive. A high number of infected cells, independently from the genotype, represents a negative predictive factor of response to antiviral treatment.

Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C Virus Recurrence Following Liver Transplantation: Long-Term Results From a Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection after liver transplantation is a virtually constant finding and leads to chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis in variable proportions. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of alpha-interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin for recurrent HCV following liver transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty of 55 patients (54.5%) with histologically proven HCV recurrence after liver transplantation were given antiviral therapy (alpha-IFN at a dose of 6 MU x 3 x week IM associated with oral ribavirin 1 g/d for 12 months) and followed up for a further 12 months after the end of the treatment. Liver and renal function tests, hemocytometric values, and HCV-RNA were assessed every 3 months throughout the therapy and follow-up. Liver biopsy was performed before and after the treatment and after another 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Eight patients (26.7%) were withdrawn from the treatment due to adverse events and another 8 (26.7%) needed a dosage reduction. Eleven patients (36.7%) had a biochemical and virological response, becoming aminotransferase and HCV-RNA negative at the end of the treatment; 6 patients (20%) still had a sustained response after 12 months of follow-up. All 6 patients are clinically stable at 6 years after completing the antiviral therapy. A low viral load before therapy was a positive predictor of sustained response. No histologically significant improvement was seen at the end of the therapy or after the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of alpha-IFN plus ribavirin induced a sustained virologic response in 20% of liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV, but intolerance of the therapy prompted its discontinuation or a dosage reduction in a large proportion of patients. However, we have observed a long-term efficacy of the antiviral therapy in the sustained responders.

Recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplant: diagnosis, natural history, and therapeutic options

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) related cirrhosis is the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Updated data suggest worse long-term outcomes for those transplanted with HCV than those transplanted for other indications. Re-infection with HCV post-OLT is universal, therefore diagnosis of recurrence should be based on histological findings in the setting of persistent viremia. Variables associated with worse outcome of recurrent disease include early recurrence, degree of immunosuppression, and donor age. Antiviral therapy has been used in the prevention and treatment of recurrent disease, and can be initiated prior to transplantation, prophylactically after transplantation, and during recurrence. Preliminary studies of pre-transplantation treatment demonstrate virological responses, but tolerance is common. Higher efficacy has been associated with combination therapy for recurrent disease. Adverse effects limit its widespread use.

Immunosuppression in hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus transplants: special considerations

The management of the immunosuppression treatment must take account its consequences on viral replication. Such treatment operates on the emerging balance between the recurrence of the virus on the graft and the immune response of the host. Randomized and prospective trials are currently ongoing with the purpose of determining the opportunity and relevance of each immunosuppressive agent in the treatment. In HBV patients, good control of HBV reinfection by prophylactic strategies using HBIG, lamivudine, or both have decreased the impact of immunosuppression on HBV recurrence. In contrast, HCV recurrence is now a major problem. The mechanisms of viral recurrence need to be deepened thus requiring new studies. The absence of in vitro and in vivo systems to study HCV reinfection is a lack in the comprehension of the relation between HCV and immunosuppression. It will allow adapting the effectiveness of the immunosuppression treatment. The treatment's primary target is to avoid graft rejection, and its secondary objective is to limit the risk of viral recurrence.

Determination of HCV genotype by direct sequence analysis of quantitative PCR products

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping, combined with quantitative evaluation of HCV RNA, may be beneficial for the management of chronic hepatitis C and in the selection of candidates for interferon treatment. In this study, the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test, a commercially available quantitative assay for HCV RNA, was used. Amplification products obtained from HCV-positive cases were subjected to direct sequencing and genotyping based on seven phylogenetically informative regions within the 5'UTR. Results were compared with those obtained by INNO-LiPA assay. Typing results yielded by both methods were in complete accordance for type and subtype assignment. Twenty-nine of 500 specimens (5.8%) were unclassifiable and belonged to samples with a titer of <70.000 IU, as determined by quantitative assay. Despite this limitation, the overall gain in efficiency, the low rate of test failure and a better resolution of mixed genotypes all constitute a considerable advantage of this system over the commercial hybridization technique for routine clinical laboratory use.

Hepatitis C virus genotyping: interrogation of the 5' untranslated region cannot accurately distinguish genotypes 1a and 1b

Although the 5' untranslated region (5' UTR) is the most conserved region of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome, it has been suggested that interrogation of this region is sufficient for determination of the HCV genotype. We compared two methods of determination of the HCV genotype: (i) direct sequencing of the DNA of the NS-5b region and (ii) reverse line probe assay (LiPA; INNO-LiPA HCV II; Innogenetics N.V.) of the 5' UTR. There was 100% concordance between the two methods for genotype but only 80% concordance for subtype. A significant percentage of genotype 1a isolates were misclassified by LiPA as genotype 1b. Sequence analysis revealed that the only consistent difference in the 5' UTR for these genotype 1a isolates misclassified as genotype 1b was a single nucleotide (A/G) at position -99 of the HCV genome. All isolates with discordant results analyzed had a G at this position, consistent with LiPA determination of these samples as subtype 1b. However, sequence analysis of 222 nucleotides in the NS-5b region clearly identified all of these isolates as subtype 1a. Population distribution data from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center of over 200 samples analyzed by sequencing of the NS-5b region and over 1,000 samples analyzed by LiPA also indicated that INNO-LiPA HCV II cannot accurately differentiate HCV genotype 1a isolates from HCV genotype 1b isolates. We provide evidence that the A/G at position -99 represents a sequence polymorphism in the HCV genome that cannot differentiate subtype 1a from subtype 1b isolates. In conclusion, the 5' UTR is not heterogeneous enough for use in determination of the HCV subtype and cannot be used for differentiation of HCV genotypes 1a and 1b.

Timing of reinfection and mechanisms of hepatocellular damage in transplanted hepatitis C virus-reinfected liver

Pathogenic mechanisms and dynamics of hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are poorly defined. This study focuses on these aspects by studying 55 frozen biopsy specimens from transplant recipients with various histological diagnoses obtained from 4 days to 4 years post-OLT and 10 patients with HCV-related chronic hepatitis. The percentage of HCV-infected hepatocytes, number and distribution of CD8 and natural killer cells, and rates of hepatocellular apoptosis and proliferation were quantified by immunohistochemistry. HCV antigens were detected in 37% of biopsy specimens obtained within 20 days and 90% of biopsy specimens obtained from 21 days to 6 months after OLT. The number of HCV-infected hepatocytes was never less than 40% in acute hepatitis specimens and never greater than 30% in the other cases. Hepatocellular apoptosis was high in biopsy specimens of acute hepatitis and moderate in those from transplant recipients with normal histological characteristics, but still greater than in specimens of chronic active hepatitis. Proliferation correlated significantly with apoptosis. Lymphocyte infiltration was high and similar among cases of acute hepatitis, chronic hepatitis, and rejection. These data: (1) show that the detection of liver HCV antigens is sensitive enough to be used in clinical practice as a diagnostic tool to detect infection of the transplanted liver and might be useful, combined with conventional histological evaluation to detect hepatitic damage, for therapeutic decision making; (2) suggest direct cytotoxicity of HCV, as well as immunologic mechanisms possibly prevalent in chronic hepatitis and rejection, at least in the phase of acute massive liver infection; and (3) show that hepatocellular apoptosis and regeneration might be active enough to lead to replacement of the entire transplanted liver in 2 weeks.

Hepatitis C virus and liver transplantation

Advances in immunosuppressive therapy, operative techniques, and perioperative management have resulted in long-term patient survival rates approaching 90% following liver transplantation for chronic viral hepatitis. The increasing number of referrals for liver transplantation reflects the impact of chronic HCV infection as a cause of end-stage liver disease. Unlike hepatitis B, there is still no effective treatment in preventing recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation. The spectrum of allograft injury related to universal HCV infection recurrence ranges from no evidence of histologic injury to mild inflammation to severe disease with allograft failure in small proportion of patients. Various factors may explain these differing outcomes, including degree of pretransplantation viremia, HLA compatibility, presence of more pathogenic HCV genotypes, integrity of cellular immune response, and type of immunosuppression. Fortunately, patient survival does not seem to be affected short-term; the long-term outcome of liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis C is unclear but is likely to be decreased. Combination therapy with interferon plus ribavirin seems to be a promising treatment strategy for posttransplantation recurrent hepatitis C, and the use of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin may improve these results. Patients with moderate to severe allograft hepatitis are appropriate candidates for combination antiviral therapy. Histopathologically documented recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients is associated with impaired quality of life, inferior physical condition, and a higher incidence of depression compared with patients who did not have HCV and in those without HCV recurrence. In conclusion, it is possible that the continued improvements in antiviral therapy against HCV infection may ultimately decrease the number of patients needing liver transplantation. Suitable candidates with chronic HCV infection thus warrant treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy in the hope of decreasing disease progression. Recent studies, which require confirmation, suggest that nonresponders to standard antiviral therapy may benefit from maintenance therapy. The donor pool for patients with chronic hepatitis C and decompensated cirrhosis can be improved by using HCV-positive donors and by increasing utilization of newer surgical techniques, including adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation and split-liver transplantation.

Late hepatic allograft dysfunction

1. Lifelong monitoring of graft function, immunosuppressive levels, and screening for drug toxicity is required in all liver recipients. 2. Late hepatic allograft dysfunction is common and is caused by a variety of etiologies including rejection, infection, biliary/vascular abnormalities, recurrence of disease, and drug hepatotoxicity. 3. In all patients with late hepatic allograft dysfunction, liver biopsy should be performed to assess for the presence of rejection, and to thus avoid excessive use of bolus corticosteroid therapy and guide appropriate immunosuppressive management. 4. Recurrence of disease is the most common cause of late hepatic allograft dysfunction. 5. Hepatitis C universally reinfects the hepatic allograft, and is associated with decreased patient and graft survival and leads to the recurrence of cirrhosis in 28% of patients within 5 years of transplantation. 6. Major advances have been made in preventing recurrence of hepatitis B by the use of hepatitis B immune globulin in combination with lamivudine therapy. 7. Autoimmune liver diseases such as primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and autoimmune hepatitis have a recurrence rate of approximately 20% to 30%. 8. In patients developing recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis, steroid withdrawal is the most common cause. 9. Recurrent hepatocellular cancer can be markedly reduced if strict guidelines are adhered to in selecting patients. 10. Drug hepatotoxicity must always be considered in the differential diagnosis of late hepatic allograft dysfunction.

Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease

Although increasing numbers of alcoholic patients are being referred to liver transplant centres, liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease still remains controversial, essentially because we are in an era of organ shortage. In fact, the main issue is the likelihood of relapse and its influence on outcome, because it is the possibility of returning to alcohol use that separates patients with alcoholic liver disease from those with other forms of chronic liver disease. In all proposed clinical guidelines of indications for referral and assessment for liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease, the authors emphasize the risk of alcoholism recurrence and, thus, a multidisciplinary approach is required to select patients who are likely to comply with follow-up and not return to a damaging pattern of alcohol consumption after transplantation. It emerges from all clinical studies that when we take into account the usual criteria of success for liver transplantation, i.e. patient and graft survival, rejection rate and infection rate, alcoholic liver disease is a good indication for liver transplantation. Predictive factors for alcoholic relapse after liver transplantation have been assessed in numerous studies, often with contradictory results making these difficult to analyse and compare. Several predictive factors for alcoholic relapse have been studied: length of abstinence before transplantation, associated psychiatric problems, social conditions, associated drug addiction, age. Abstinence after transplantation is the goal, but the necessary treatment for alcoholic disease can result in considerable improvement, even when complete abstinence is not achieved. Finally, the good results obtained with liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease should help us to educate the general population about alcoholic disease.

Hepatitis C virus RNA assays: a comparison of SuperQuant and Monitor

Hepatitis C RNA testing has been used extensively to assess the efficacy of antiviral therapy and has increasingly become an integral part of clinical management of patients with chronic hepatitis C. A variety of commercially available hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA tests are used to detect HCV RNA qualitatively or quantitatively. These commercial tests have fundamental differences that are reflected on the values they generate. We compared two widely used assays, HCV SuperQuant (SQ) and Amplicor HCV Monitor (M1 and M2), in sera of patients with chronic hepatitis C. A total of 506 sera from 79 patients were tested with both assays. The data were logarithmically transformed and analyzed by linear regression and measurement of agreement. Two hundred thirty-eight sera had HCV RNA values within the dynamic range of both assays. The correlation between the assays was fair, with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.699. Overall, SQ generated higher values than M1 with a mean difference of 0.558 log (SD = 0.624). One hundred ninety-four (38%) and 121 (24%) of the sera were below the dynamic range of M1 and SQ, respectively. Seventy-three sera, undetectable by M1, were positive by SQ. The Amplicor HCV Monitor 2.0 (M2) was performed in 66 sera. All were positive by SQ and M2, but only 38 were within the dynamic range of M1. The correlations between these tests were good (r = 0.68-0.78), but the agreement was rather poor. In conclusion, this study confirms that both SQ and M2 are more sensitive than M1. Additionally, our results show rather poor agreements between these assays. The recent attempts in standardizing the reporting of these assays should make their results more easily interchangeable.

High levels of hepatitis C virus RNA in native livers correlate with the development of cholestatic hepatitis in liver allografts and a poor outcome

A subset of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive liver transplant recipients develop cholestatic hepatitis (CH). We investigated the role of pretransplantation disease activity (estimated by Knodell score and HCV RNA quantitation) in the native liver explant on the development of CH and graft and patient outcome. Eight patients with CH were identified among HCV-positive liver transplants and were compared with 20 consecutive patients with recurrent HCV hepatitis of noncholestatic type in liver transplants. We evaluated all 28 explanted native livers histologically using the Knodell scoring system. HCV viral load was measured in the native explant and 5 allograft explants from the CH group using Amplicor HCV RNA Monitor test. Six of 8 patients with CH had HCV RNA levels of 5,000 copies/microg of DNA or greater in the native liver explant, whereas only 1 of the control group had viral loads greater than this level. Greater HCV RNA levels correlated with worse graft and patient survival (P <.001). The 3-year survival rate in the CH group was 18% compared with 77% in the control group (P <.001). There was no difference in the primary immunosuppressive regimens used in the 2 groups. We conclude that (1) CH has a uniformly poor prognosis, (2) type of immunosuppressive therapy appears to have little influence on the development of CH, (3) high pretransplantation HCV RNA levels in the native explant may predict the development of CH, and (4) patients with high HCV RNA levels in the explanted native liver may be appropriate candidates for antiviral therapy to prevent the development of CH.

Liver transplantation of patients in end-stage cirrhosis

The success of liver transplantation has resulted in its widespread use for end-stage liver disease; 1- and 5-year survival rates of 70-90% and 60-80% respectively have been reported. Indications for assessment for liver transplantation are now evidence-based and early referral is recommended, correlating with improved patient survival. The management of patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation is designed to prevent complications of liver disease and to avoid therapeutic misadventures. Following transplantation, rejection and infection dominate post-operative complications, and improvements in their prevention and treatment have also correlated with improved patient survival. The development and introduction into clinical practice of a variety of immunosuppressive agents has offered a bewildering array of therapeutic options but with a lack of evidence on which to select optimal immunosuppression. Similarly, difficulties remain in the treatment of some of the complications arising from liver transplantation such as recurrence of disease and complications of immunosuppression.

Serum hepatitis C virus RNA levels and histologic findings in liver allografts with early recurrent hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Histopathologic features of early recurrent hepatitis C after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx) may be modified by immunosuppressive therapy or complicated by other conditions. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA level usually increases after OLTx, but its correlation to histologic findings is not clear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the histologic findings of early recurrent hepatitis C in liver allografts and its correlation to serum HCV RNA level.

METHODS

We studied 14 patients who underwent OLTx for chronic HCV infection. Thirty liver biopsy specimens and HCV RNA levels of 22 corresponding plasma samples obtained during the first 6 months following OLTx were analyzed. The control group (9 patients, 25 biopsy specimens) was chosen at random from patients with chronic liver disease other than HCV who were undergoing OLTx, and all tested negative for HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction after OLTx.

RESULTS

Statistically significant pathological features of early recurrent HCV infection were the number of acidophilic bodies, piecemeal necrosis, lymphocyte predominance in the portal tracts, and fibrous septum. These findings and histologic activity index scores increased with time after OLTx. The HCV RNA levels determined by branched DNA assay showed no significant correlation with histologic features. However, patients with higher histologic activity index scores tended to have higher RNA levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver biopsy specimens are helpful for the diagnosis or confirmation of early recurrent hepatitis C in liver allografts, but serial biopsy specimens are sometimes required for definite diagnosis. The HCV RNA levels are usually higher in patients who display signs of more severe liver damage.

Prolonged rewarming time during allograft implantation predisposes to recurrent hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation

The majority of patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) have end-stage liver disease secondary to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Although OLT does not cure the disease and recurrent virus is present in all patients, relatively few patients with recurrent viremia develop clinical disease. When the disease recurs, however, the results can be devastating. Factors associated with increased risk for recurrent HCV disease remain controversial. We hypothesized that preservation injury may predispose to the severity of HCV disease after OLT. We reviewed our series of OLTs performed for HCV cirrhosis between January 1994 and December 1998 (n = 56; 62 transplants). Patients were grouped according to the severity of recurrent hepatitis C. Group 1 had no or mild HCV disease (n = 36), and group 2 had moderate to severe HCV disease (n = 20). The duration of ischemic rewarming during graft implantation was significantly associated with the severity of recurrent hepatitis C (P <.04). The estimated chances of severe disease within the first year post-OLT after 30, 60, or 90 minutes of ischemic rewarming time were 19%, 40%, and 65%, respectively. Cold ischemia time, transaminase levels, and prothrombin time did not correlate with the severity of hepatitis C. In conclusion, our data suggest that the duration of ischemic rewarming predisposes to severe recurrent hepatitis C. This finding warrants the investigation of the pathogenesis of recurrent HCV disease after ischemic injury. Reduction of rewarming time should be stressed in OLT, particularly in patients with HCV cirrhosis.

Viral clearance in hepatitis C (1b) infection: relationship with human leukocyte antigen class II in a homogeneous population

The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of a significant relationship between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II and the clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV). The study group consisted of 156 Irish women who iatrogenically received HCV 1b-contaminated Anti-D immunoglobulin between May 1977 and November 1978. Thus, the study population was homogeneous in terms of gender, source of infection, and ethnicity. On Screening in 1994, all individuals were anti-HCV antibody positive by recombinant immunoblot assay, while 46% (n = 72) of the group were HCV-positive by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). HLA DRB1 and DQB1 status was molecularly defined by high resolution reverse line probe hybridization methodology. Clearance of HCV 1b was found to be associated with DRB1*01. However, this association was lost after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Extended haplotype analysis between specific DRB1 and DQB1 allelic combinations identified a significant reduction in the frequency of DQB1*0501 in the presence of DRB1*0701 in the persistently infected individuals in the study group (P <.05). No associations with either viral clearance or persistence were found at the DQB1 locus. Our results suggest that HLA DRB1*01 appears to contribute to the spontaneous resolution of a primary HCV infection in the Irish population. The presence of DRB1*0701 in the absence of DQB1*0501 possibly reflects an influence of this allele in persistence of HCV infection. Defined and homogeneous patient populations offer the best opportunity to illuminate previously disguised immunogenetic factors important in the clearance of HCV 1b.

Clinical significance of hepatitis C virus genotypes

On the basis of phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequences, multiple genotypes and subtypes of hepatitis C virus (HCV) have been identified. Characterization of these genetic groups is likely to facilitate and contribute to the development of an effective vaccine against infection with HCV. Differences among HCV genotypes in geographic distributions have provided investigators with an epidemiologic marker that can be used to trace the source of HCV infection in a given population. HCV genotype 1 may represent a more aggressive strain and one that is less likely to respond to interferon treatment than HCV genotype 2 or 3. However, these observations require confirmation before HCV genotyping can be used in clinical settings.

Clinical significance of hepatitis C virus genotypes

On the basis of phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequences, multiple genotypes and subtypes of hepatitis C virus (HCV) have been identified. Characterization of these genetic groups is likely to facilitate and contribute to the development of an effective vaccine against infection with HCV. Differences among HCV genotypes in geographic distributions have provided investigators with an epidemiologic marker that can be used to trace the source of HCV infection in a given population. HCV genotype 1 may represent a more aggressive strain and one that is less likely to respond to interferon treatment than HCV genotype 2 or 3. However, these observations require confirmation before HCV genotyping can be used in clinical settings.

Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: clinical and therapeutical issues

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection after liver transplantation is almost constant, assessed by the persistence of HCV RNA in 90% of cases. Acute hepatitis appeared in 75% of patients at a median of 4 months' post-transplantation. The 5-year actuarial rate of acute and chronic hepatitis on the graft is 75% and 60%, respectively. The rate of HCV cirrhosis on the graft is variable from 8 to 25% at 5 years. After transplantation, HCV viraemia is dramatically increased and correlates with the occurrence of acute hepatitis on the graft. Intrahepatic levels of HCV are high at the time of acute hepatitis, and decrease with constitution of chronic graft hepatitis lesions, implying an immunological response to the viral infection. A relationship between genotype 1b and the prevalence of HCV hepatitis on the graft has been suggested in European but not American series. The influence of the age of the recipient, quasispecies, viral compartmentalization, immunosuppressive treatment, and of HLA matching is being evaluated. The 5-year patient survival is around 65-80%. However, the occurrence of cirrhosis with a risk of graft failure may decrease the 10 and 15-year patient survival. Attempts to give prophylactic post-transplant antiviral treatment are under evaluation. Antiviral treatment of post-transplant graft lesions with combination therapy interferon-ribavirin gave promising results but indications and duration of treatment should be evaluated. In conclusion, HCV reinfection is frequent, but medium-term survival is good. However, the long-term graft and patient survival remains unknown, and efficient prevention and treatment of HCV graft is mandatory.

Hyperbilirubinemia and cholestatic liver injury in hepatitis C-infected liver transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

A cholestatic pattern of liver injury has been observed in liver transplant recipients with rapidly progressive hepatitis C. We assessed the frequency and causes of cholestasis in hepatitis C-infected liver transplant patients, and evaluated the clinical and pathological course of those with cholestatic hepatitis C.

METHODS

Sixty-nine sequential liver transplant recipients who had detectable hepatitis C viremia were studied retrospectively. Records and diagnostic tests were examined from patients who developed hyperbilirubinemia.

RESULTS

Hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 33 of 69 (48%) hepatitis C-infected liver transplant patients. A thorough evaluation including review of clinical and laboratory data, ultrasound with Doppler, cholangiogram, and liver biopsy identified causes of hyperbilirubinemia other than hepatitis C in 26 of 33 patients. Seven patients developed cholestatic hepatitis C characterized by histological features of recurrent hepatitis C and cholestatic liver injury with ballooning of centrilobular hepatocytes, bile ductular proliferation, and canalicular cholestasis, in the absence of other causes of cholestasis. Five progressed rapidly to bridging fibrosis and two died of complications related to liver failure. Four patients with cholestatic hepatitis C showed extended survival after the onset of hyperbilirubinemia.

CONCLUSIONS

1) Hepatitis C is a relatively infrequent cause of cholestasis in liver transplant recipients. 2) The diagnosis of cholestatic hepatitis C requires a multimodality approach to exclude other causes of cholestasis. 3) Cholestatic hepatitis C ranges in severity and is not always associated with rapid development of graft failure, although significant histological abnormalities are frequent.

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation

In patients transplanted for HCV cirrhosis, reinfection by the virus is constant. Medium-term survival is good but long-term occurrence of cirrhosis is likely to impair the long-term prognosis of these patients. Patients should be informed before transplantation of the spontaneous risk of HCV recurrence and of its consequences. As for hepatitis B in the last decade, new antiviral therapies and immunosuppressive approaches will certainly change the course of HCV after transplantation.

Hepatitis C virus genotypes and quasispecies

Genetic heterogeneity is a hallmark of the hepatitis C virus, as a result largely of the infidelity of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Random nucleotide substitutions are introduced at a very high rate. The existence of genotypes was confirmed by statistical and mathematical techniques, and the relation of the genotypes to each other has been determined. There are six major genotypes, each with multiple subtypes. Isolates of the same genotype have an average sequence homology of 95%, but different genotypes have sequence similarity of approximately 65% on average. The nucleotide sequence in portions of the hepatitis C viral genome, including the 5' noncoding region, part of the core gene, and other nonstructural proteins, is highly conserved. Genotype analysis typically utilizes these highly conserved regions. There are many techniques for determining viral genotype, and in general, concordance between techniques is good. Methods most commonly used for assigning hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes in clinical practice include restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and the reverse hybridization line probe assay (LiPA; Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium). The worldwide distribution of HCV genotypes has been determined; some genotypes are highly characteristic of certain areas. The most common subtypes, 1 and 2, are less genetically diverse than the others and are more widely distributed. The impact of genotype on disease course is controversial, but recent data suggest that there is a genotype-dependent differential response to therapy. Quasispecies refers to evolution of a highly related but genetically heterogeneous population of HCV isolates. The pathobiological and clinical implications of HCV quasispecies are poorly understood.

European collaborative study on factors influencing outcome after liver transplantation for hepatitis C. European Concerted Action on Viral Hepatitis (EUROHEP) Group

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease is characterized by frequent graft infection by HCV. The prognosis and risk factors for morbidity and mortality in this condition were determined.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 652 consecutive anti-HCV-positive patients undergoing liver transplantation between 1984 and 1995 in 15 European centers was conducted; 102 patients coinfected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) received immunoglobulin prophylaxis for antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen.

RESULTS

Overall, 5-year survival was 72%. Five-year actuarial rates of hepatitis and cirrhosis were 80% and 10%. Genotypes 1b, 1a, and 2 were detected in 214 (80%), 24 (9%), and 24 (9%) of 268 patients analyzed. The only discriminant factor for patient or graft survival was hepatocellular carcinoma as primary indication. Independent risk factors for recurrent hepatitis included the absence of HBV coinfection before transplantation (relative risk [RR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.6; P = 0.005), genotype 1b (RR, 2; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9; P = 0.01), and age > 49 years (RR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of transplantation for HCV-related disease are compromised by a significant risk of cirrhosis, although 5-year survival is satisfactory. Genotype 1b, age, and absence of pretransplantation coinfection by HBV are risk factors for recurrent HCV.

Liver transplantation for chronic viral hepatitis

A better understanding of the mechanism of viral replication and of viral transmission has led to improved results with OLTx for patients with end-stage liver disease caused by viral hepatitis. Patients with hepatitis-B-related liver disease who are HBV-DNA negative can expect excellent survival after OLTx with long-term HBIG therapy. Patients coinfected with HDV who are HBV-DNA negative can also expect an excellent rate of survival. HBV-DNA-positive patients may benefit from the addition of lamivudine to the prophylactic regimen both before and after OLTx. De novo HBV infections generally have a very benign course. Lamivudine has proven to be very effective in the treatment of both de novo and recurrent HBV infection after OLTx; however, resistance can develop. Allografts from donors with antibodies to HBV can be used most effectively when directed to recipients who also harbor HBV antibodies. The recurrence of HCV infection after OLTx is universal; however, the 5-year survival rate in patients who received OLTx for HCV-related liver disease is not diminished. Although a few patients experience an aggressive recurrence of HCV infection after OLTx, prognostic indicators have not been determined to allow for identification of these patients. Alpha-interferon does not seem to be effective in the treatment of recurrent HCV infection after OLTx. Trials with combination alpha-interferon-ribavirin are underway. Retransplantation for HCV-related allograft failure can be performed safely in patients if performed before the onset of other organ system failure. Finally, anti-HCV-positive recipients of allografts from anti-HCV-positive donors have an excellent 5-year survival rate.