Disparate roles of CXCR3A and CXCR3B in regulating progressive properties of colorectal cancer cells

The Role of CXCL11 and its Receptors in Cancer: Prospective but Challenging Clinical Targets

Chemokine ligand 11 is a member of the CXC chemokine family and exerts its biological function mainly through binding to CXCR3 and CXCR7. The CXCL11 gene is ubiquitously overexpressed in various human malignant tumors; however, its specific mechanisms vary among different cancer types. Recent studies have found that CXCL11 is involved in the activation of multiple oncogenic signaling pathways and is closely related to tumorigenesis, progression, chemotherapy tolerance, immunotherapy efficacy, and poor prognosis. Depending on the specific expression of its receptor subtype, CXCL11 also has a complex 2-fold role in tumours; therefore, directly targeting the structure-function of CXCL11 and its receptors may be a challenging task. In this review, we summarize the biological functions of CXCL11 and its receptors and their roles in various types of malignant tumors and point out the directions for clinical applications.

Targeting CXCL9/10/11-CXCR3 axis: an important component of tumor-promoting and antitumor immunity

Chemokines are chemotactic-competent molecules composed of a family of small cytokines, playing a key role in regulating tumor progression. The roles of chemokines in antitumor immune responses are of great interest. CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 are important members of chemokines. It has been widely investigated that these three chemokines can bind to their common receptor CXCR3 and regulate the differentiation, migration, and tumor infiltration of immune cells, directly or indirectly affecting tumor growth and metastasis. Here, we summarize the mechanism of how the CXCL9/10/11-CXCR3 axis affects the tumor microenvironment, and list the latest researches to find out how this axis predicts the prognosis of different cancers. In addition, immunotherapy improves the survival of tumor patients, but some patients show drug resistance. Studies have found that the regulation of CXCL9/10/11-CXCR3 on the tumor microenvironment is involved in the process of changing immunotherapy resistance. Here we also describe new approaches to restoring sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors through the CXCL9/10/11-CXCR3 axis.

Functional Analysis of CXCR3 Splicing Variants and Their Ligands Using NanoBiT-Based Molecular Interaction Assays

CXCR3 regulates leukocyte trafficking, maturation, and various pathophysiological conditions. Alternative splicing generates three CXCR3 isoforms in humans. Previous studies investigated the roles of CXCR3 isoforms, and some biochemical data are not correlated with biological relevance analyses. RT-PCR analyses indicate that most cells express all three splicing variants, suggesting that they may mutually affect the chemokine binding and cellular responses of other splicing variants. Here, we performed an integrative analysis of the functional relations among CXCR3 splicing variants and their chemokine-dependent signaling using NanoBiT live cell protein interaction assays. The results indicated that the CXCR3 N-terminal region affected cell surface expression levels and ligand-dependent activation. CXCR3A was efficiently expressed in the plasma membrane and responded to I-TAC, IP-10, and MIG chemokines. By contrast, CXCR3B had low plasma membrane expression and mediated I-TAC-stimulated cellular responses. CXCR3Alt was rarely expressed on the cell surface and did not mediate any cell responses to the tested chemokines; however, CXCR3Alt negatively affected the plasma membrane expression of CXCR3A and CXCR3B and their chemokine-stimulated cellular responses. Jurkat cells express endogenous CXCR3, and exogenous CXCR3A expression enhanced chemotactic activity in response to I-TAC, IP-10, and MIG. By contrast, exogenous expression of CXCR3B and CXCR3Alt eliminated or reduced the CXCR3A-induced chemotactic activity. The PF-4 chemokine did not activate any CXCR3-mediated cellular responses. NanoBiT technology are useful to integrative studies of CXCR3-mediated cell signaling, and expand our knowledge of the cellular responses mediated by molecular interactions among the splicing variants, including cell surface expression, ligand-dependent receptor activation, and chemotaxis.

Amentoflavone Exerts Anti-Neuroinflammatory Effects by Inhibiting TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB and Activating Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway in Lipopolysaccharide-Induced BV2 Microglia

Background

Amentoflavone, a natural biflavone, exerts anti-inflammation, antioxidation, and antiapoptosis effects on many diseases. However, the mechanism of amentoflavone on neuroinflammation-related diseases has not been comprehensively examined clearly.

Methods

BV2 microglial cells were treated with amentoflavone (10 μM), followed by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Microglial activation and migration ability and the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and other signaling proteins were determined using immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and wound-healing assays.

Results

Amentoflavone restored LPS-induced microglia activation, migration, and inflammation response which depends on regulating toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88)/nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway. In addition, amentoflavone also enhanced nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) levels in LPS-treated BV2 microglial cells.

Conclusions

Amentoflavone ameliorated LPS-induced neuroinflammatory response and oxidative stress in BV2 microglia. These data provide new insight into the mechanism of amentoflavone in the treatment of neuroinflammation-related diseases. Therefore, amentoflavone may be a potential therapeutic option for neurological disorders.

Analysis of CCR2 splice variant expression patterns and functional properties

Background

C–C motif chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2), the main receptor for monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), is expressed on immune cells, including monocytes, macrophages, and activated T cells, and mediates cell migration toward MCP-1 in inflammation-related diseases. The CCR2 gene encodes two isoforms: CCR2A and CCR2B. The CCR2B open reading frame is localized in a single exon, similar to other chemokine receptors, and CCR2A and CCR2B feature different amino acid sequences in their C-terminal intracellular loops due to alternative splicing. Most biochemical studies on CCR2-related cellular responses in the immune system have focused on CCR2B, with few reports focused on CCR2A. Understanding the functional properties of CCR2A in cellular responses may elucidate the roles played by MCP-1 and CCR2 in pathophysiological responses.

Results

CCR2 gene expression analysis in several cell types revealed that most adherent cells only expressed CCR2A, whereas CCR2B expression was dominant in monocytic cells. The C-terminal Helix 8 region of CCR2A contains few basic amino acids, which may be unfavorable for cell surface localization, as confirmed with the HiBiT assay. CCR2B contains many C-terminal Ser/Thr residues, similar to other chemokine receptors, which may be phosphorylated by G protein–coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) to promote β-arrestin recruitment and subsequent endocytosis. By contrast, CCR2A contains few C-terminal Ser/Thr residues, which are unlikely to be phosphorylated by GRKs. CCR2A localized on the cell surface is resistant to internalization, despite the interaction between Gβ and GRKs induced by ligand binding with CCR2A. CCR2A induced cellular responses at a relatively higher degree than CCR2B, although both receptors mediated signaling events through Gαq and Gαi. HeLa cells lacking CCR2A showed slowed growth compared with parent cells, regardless of MCP-1 stimulation, and their chemotactic activity toward MCP-1, in addition to basal motility, was significantly impaired.

Conclusion

MCP-1 and CCR2 may play pivotal roles in cancer progression by recruiting macrophages into cancer tissue. This study demonstrates that CCR2A but not CCR2B is expressed in solid cancer–derived cells. CCR2A is resistant to internalization by β-arrestin due to a distinct C-terminal region from CCR2B, which enhances MCP-1-stimulated responses, indicating that CCR2A may play essential roles in solid cancer progression.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13578-022-00787-6.

The role of CXCR3 and its ligands in cancer

Chemokines are a class of small cytokines or signaling proteins that are secreted by cells. Owing to their ability to induce directional chemotaxis of nearby responding cells, they are called chemotactic cytokines. Chemokines and chemokine receptors have now been shown to influence many cellular functions, including survival, adhesion, invasion, and proliferation, and regulate chemokine levels. Most malignant tumors express one or more chemokine receptors. The CXC subgroup of chemokine receptors, CXCR3, is mainly expressed on the surface of activated T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells, and plays an essential role in infection, autoimmune diseases, and tumor immunity by binding to specific receptors on target cell membranes to induce targeted migration and immune responses. It is vital to treat infections, autoimmune diseases, and tumors. CXCR3 and its ligands, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11, are closely associated with the development and progression of many tumors. With the elucidation of its mechanism of action, CXCR3 is expected to become a new indicator for evaluating the prognosis of patients with tumors and a new target for clinical tumor immunotherapy. This article reviews the significance and mechanism of action of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 and its specific ligands in tumor development.

Regulation of Tumor and Metastasis Initiation by Chemokine Receptors

Tumor-initiating cells (TICs) are a rare sub-population of cells within the bulk of a tumor that are major contributors to tumor initiation, metastasis, and chemoresistance. TICs have a stem-cell-like phenotype that is dictated by the expression of master regulator transcription factors, including OCT4, NANOG, and SOX2. These transcription factors are expressed via activation of multiple signaling pathways that drive cancer initiation and progression. Importantly, these same signaling pathways can be activated by select chemokine receptors. Chemokine receptors are increasingly being revealed as major drivers of the TIC phenotype, as their signaling can lead to activation of stemness-controlling transcription factors. Additionally, the cell surface expression of chemokine receptors provides a unique therapeutic target to disrupt signaling pathways that control the expression of master regulator transcription factors and the TIC phenotype. This review summarizes the master regulator transcription factors known to dictate the TIC phenotype, along with the complex signaling pathways that can mediate their expression and the chemokine receptors that are most upstream of this phenotype.

CXCR3 isoform A promotes head and neck cancer progression by enhancing stem-like property and chemoresistance

The chemokine network orchestrates the cancer stem-like property and consequently participates in cancer progression. CXCR3 contributes cancer progressive property and immunomodulation in the tumor microenvironment. The two major isoforms of CXCR3 are scrutinized and the divergence is showed that CXCR3A promotes cancer cell growth and motility while CXCR3B functions contrarily in many studies. However, rare studies illustrate the role of CXCR3 isoforms in cancer stem-like property and chemoresistance, especially in head and neck cancer (HNC). First, we used immunohistochemistry staining to evaluate expression levels of CXCR3, CXCR3B, and Sox2 cancer stem cell (CSC) marker and association with tumor progression in HNC tissues. Results showed that high levels of CXCR3 were significantly associated with advanced stage (p <0.01), regional lymph node metastasis (p <0.05), and poor differentiation (p <0.005) and further correlated with worse survival rate in oral cancer patients (p = 0.036). Higher levels of CXCR3B were found in regional lymphatic invasion of HNC and progressive stage of squamous cell carcinoma. Elevated Sox2 expression was significantly associated with the advanced stage of HNC in the oral cavity, and demonstrated a co-expression pattern with CXCR3B. Furthermore, lentivirus-mediated overexpression of CXCR3A and CXCR3B in SAS human oral cancer cells promoted cell mobility. CXCR3A overexpression enhanced sphere-forming ability and chemoresistance of CSCs by upregulating stemness-related genes. This study first provides a novel insight of CXCR3 isoform A in HNC cancer progression via regulating cancer stem-like properties and chemoresistance, suggesting that CXCR3A may be a prognostic marker and novel target for HNC therapy.

Contribution of CXCR3-mediated signaling in the metastatic cascade of solid malignancies

Metastasis is a significant cause of the mortality resulting from solid malignancies. The process of metastasis is complex and is regulated by numerous cancer cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic factors. CXCR3 is a chemokine receptor that is frequently expressed by cancer cells, endothelial cells and immune cells. CXCR3A signaling in cancer cells tends to promote the invasive and migratory phenotype of cancer cells. Indirectly, CXCR3 modulates the anti-tumor immune response resulting in variable effects that can permit or inhibit metastatic progression. Finally, the activity of CXCR3B in endothelial cells is generally angiostatic, which limits the access of cancer cells to key conduits to secondary sites. However, the interaction of these activities within a tumor and the presence of opposing CXCR3 splice variants clouds the picture of the role of CXCR3 in metastasis. Consequently, thorough analysis of the contributions of CXCR3 to cancer metastasis is necessary. This review is an in-depth examination of the involvement of CXCR3 in the metastatic process of solid malignancies.

Alternative splicing: An important regulatory mechanism in colorectal carcinoma

Alternative splicing (AS) is a process that produces various mRNA splicing isoforms via different splicing patterns of mRNA precursors (pre-mRNAs). AS is the primary mechanism for increasing the types and quantities of proteins to improve biodiversity and influence multiple biological processes, including chromatin modification, signal transduction, and protein expression. It has been reported that AS is involved in the tumorigenesis and development of colorectal carcinoma (CRC). In this review, we delineate the concept, types, regulatory processes, and technical advances of AS and focus on the role of AS in CRC initiation, progression, treatment, and prognosis. This summary of the current knowledge about AS will contribute to our understanding of CRC initiation and development. This study will help in the discovery of novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for CRC prognosis and treatment.

The CXCL11-CXCR3A axis influences the infiltration of CD274 and IDO1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The CXCL9/10/11-CXCR3 axis plays pivotal roles in the recruitment of immune cells and the formation of cancer-specific immunity in various cancers. High expression of immune checkpoints, which could be regulated by cytokines, is closely related to the establishment of immune escape in tumor microenvironment. Therefore, the study was tried to provide insights into the influence of the CXCL9/10/11-CXCR3 axis on immune checkpoints in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), especially oral leukoplakia (OLK).

METHODS

The mRNA levels of CXCL9/10/11 and CXCR3 were analyzed in TCGA, GEO and Oncomine and verified in OLK and OSCC. The specimens were used to analysis the relationship between CXCL9/10/11 and CXCR3 variants. The correlation between CXCL9/10/11 and immune checkpoint/ligand in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma was analyzed in TIMER and confirmed in samples. Small interference transfection of CXCL11 in SCC25 cells was used to evaluate the function of CXCL11 on CD274/IDO1 expression.

RESULTS

CXCL9/10/11 had increase expression trends from normal tissues to OSCC. The proportion of CXCR3A (one variant of CXCR3) was significantly increased in OSCC comparing with normal tissues, while other variants-CXCR3B and CXCR3alt-did not. CXCL9/10/11 was positively correlated with CXCR3A and immune checkpoints/ligand (IDO1, LAG3, and CD274) in OLK and OSCC. CXCL11-knockdown SCC25 cells could directly inhibit the intracellular expression of CD274 and IDO1.

CONCLUSION

The upregulated CXCL9/10/11-CXCR3A axis may interact with immune checkpoints/their ligands in OLK and OSCC. Furthermore, CXCL11 may affect the expression of CD274 and IDO1 in an autocrine mode in OSCC.

The Chemokine Receptor CXCR3 Isoform B Drives Breast Cancer Stem Cells

We are seeking to identify molecular targets that are relevant to breast cancer cells with stem-like properties. There is growing evidence that cancer stem cells (CSCs) are supported by inflammatory mediators expressed in the tumor microenvironment. The chemokine receptor CXCR3 binds the interferon-γ-inducible, ELR-negative CXC chemokines CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 and malignant cells have co-opted this receptor to promote tumor cell migration and invasion. There are 2 major isoforms of CXCR3: CXCR3A and CXCR3B. The latter is generated from alternative splicing and results in a protein with a longer N-terminal domain. CXCR3 isoform A is generally considered to play a major role in tumor metastasis. When the entire tumor cell population is examined, CXCR3 isoform B is usually detected at much lower levels than CXCR3A and for this, and other reasons, was not considered to drive tumor progression. We have shown that CXCR3B is significantly upregulated in the subpopulation of breast CSCs in comparison with the bulk tumor cell population in 3 independent breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231, SUM159, and T47D). Modulation of CXCR3B levels by knock in strategies increases CSC populations identified by aldehyde dehydrogenase activity or CD44⁺CD24⁻ phenotype as well as tumorsphere-forming capacity. The reverse is seen when CXCR3B is gene-silenced. CXCL11 and CXCL10 directly induce CSC. We also report that novel CXCR3 allosteric modulators BD064 and BD103 prevent the induction of CSCs. BD103 inhibited experimental metastasis. This protective effect is associated with the reversal of CXCR3 ligand-mediated activation of STAT3, ERK1/2, CREB, and NOTCH1 pathways. We propose that CXCR3B, expressed on CSC, should be explored further as a novel therapeutic target.