Understanding, Impact, and Communication of "Off" Periods in Parkinson's Disease: A Scoping Review

Advanced Parkinson's disease treatment patterns in Italy: an observational study interim analysis

BACKGROUND

Oral levodopa remains the mainstay of treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, as PD progresses, response to treatment may fluctuate. Managing fluctuations can be demanding for clinicians and patients. There is a paucity of real-world studies reporting on PD management in patients with fluctuations in treatment response, especially in patients with advanced stages of PD. The multicentre, observational Parkinson's Disease Fluctuations treatment PAthway (PD-FPA) study describes the real-life management of response fluctuations in Italian patients with advanced PD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PD-FPA had a retrospective and prospective phase; herein, retrospective results are presented. Ten Italian centres enrolled patients with a PD diagnosis from 10-15 years prior to study entry (T0) and who had ≥2-year history of fluctuations. Data on patient demographics, medical history, PD stage, fluctuation characteristics, symptoms, and prescribed treatments were collected at T0 and retrospectively (2 years prior to T0) via patient chart review/interview.

RESULTS

Overall, 296 patients (60% male, mean age 68 years, 84% with Hoehn and Yahr scores 2-3) were enrolled. At T0, most patients (99.3%) were on oral levodopa therapy. All patients used dopaminergic medications; adjunctive medications included dopamine agonists (56%) and monoamine oxidase B (60%) and catechol-O-methyltransferase enzyme inhibitors (41%). At T0, 51% of patients had changed therapy, with response fluctuations being the most common reason (74%); wearing-off was the most common fluctuation (83%).

CONCLUSION

This interim analysis of PD-FPA suggests that adequate levodopa dosing and adjunctive medications can stabilize advanced PD and provide patients with a good quality of life.

Real-World Experiences of Parkinson's Disease OFF Time and Role of Demographics

Purpose

OFF periods are episodes when Parkinson's disease (PD) medications work suboptimally, with symptoms returning and impacting quality of life. We aimed to characterize OFF periods using patient-reported frequency, severity, and duration, as well as determine these characteristics' associations with demographics.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study using Fox Insight Data Exploration Network (Fox DEN) database was conducted. Eligible patients had PD and were >18 years. The experience of OFF periods was characterized by frequency (number of episodes/day), duration (duration/episode), and severity (impact on activities). Significance level was Bonferroni-corrected for multivariate analyses.

Results

From a population of 6,757 persons with PD, 88% were non-Hispanic Whites (mean age: 66 ± 8.8 years); 52.7% were males versus 47.3% females; mean PD duration was 5.7 ± 5.2; and 51% experienced OFF periods. Subsequent analyses were limited to non-Hispanic Whites, as they constituted a large majority of the participants and were the subgroup that had the sample size to derive reliable inferences. The analyses showed that 67% experienced 1-2 episodes/day, 90% experienced >15-minute episodes, and 55% reported slight-mild severity/episode. Lower age was associated with a higher frequency (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.992; P<0.001) and severity (odds ratio [OR]: 0.985; P=0.001) of OFF episodes. Income of <$35,000 was associated with 15.1% more episodes/day (IRR: 1.15, p<0.001) and 66.5% higher odds of a severe episode (OR: 1.66; P<0.001). Females experienced 7.5% more episodes compared to males (IRR: 1.075; P=0.003). Longer PD duration was associated with 1.3% more episodes/day (IRR: 1.013; P<0.001) and 10% higher odds of a severe episode (OR: 1.10; P<0.001).

Conclusions

Lower age, income <$35,000, longer PD duration, female gender, and being unemployed are associated with a higher frequency and severity of OFF periods with no associations for duration/episode among non-Hispanic Whites with PD. In time-constrained clinic environments, clinicians should tailor OFF periods management counseling to vulnerable demographic groups to enhance care delivery.(J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024;11:8-17.).

Clinical Use of On-Demand Therapies for Patients with Parkinson's Disease and OFF Periods

On-demand therapies for Parkinson's disease (PD) provide rapid, reliable relief for patients experiencing OFF periods; however, practical guidelines on the use of these therapies are not generally available. This paper reviews the use of on-demand treatments. Motor fluctuations occur in nearly all patients with PD after long-term use of levodopa. As the goal of PD treatment is to provide good ON time, on-demand treatments that have a more rapid reliable onset than the slower-acting oral medications provide rapid relief for OFF periods. All current on-demand treatments bypass the gastrointestinal tract, providing dopaminergic therapy directly into the blood stream by subcutaneous injection, through the buccal mucosa, or by inhalation into the pulmonary circulation. On-demand treatments are fast acting (10- to 20-min onset), with maximum, reliable, and significant responses reached within 30 min after administration. Oral medications pass through the gastrointestinal tract and thus have slower absorption owing to gastroparesis and competition with food. On-demand therapies, by providing fast-acting relief, can have a positive impact on a patient's quality of life when patients are experiencing OFF periods.

Intermittent Apomorphine Use for off Period Rescue in Parkinson's Disease: A Pragmatic Review of over Three Decades of Clinical Experience

Background

Although proven very efficacious as treatment for Parkinson's disease by Schwab as far back as the 1950s, and later confirmed by Cotzias and colleagues in the early 1970s, use of intermittent subcutaneous injections of the dopamine agonist apomorphine remains limited worldwide.

Objectives

To review evidence regarding use of intermittent, on-demand apomorphine as a treatment for off-period disability in Parkinson's disease.

Methods

A PRISMA-compliant structured literature search was carried out with a focus on clinical effect (motor improvement, daily off time decrease; latency, duration), antiemetic prophylaxis, and adverse events.

Results

Fifty-eight studies were evaluated. Apomorphine administration route was subcutaneous in 29 (50%), sublingual in 14 (24.1%), intranasal in 6 (10.3%), inhaled in 5 (8.6%), rectal in 3 (5.2%) and transdermal in 1 (1.7%). Irrespective of the route, motor disability improved 19% to 74% and daily off time decreased 3% to 68%, with subcutaneous having the fastest onset of action ranging from 6 to 24 minutes and lasting 28 to 96 minutes. Antiemetic prophylaxis was used in almost all studies. Systemic side effects like nausea and yawning were mild and well tolerated, but sedation led to discontinuation of subcutaneous apomorphine in 5.5%. Local side effects to subcutaneous administration did not result in discontinuation. Stomatitis with the early sublingual formulations led to discontinuation in nearly half of patients and was reduced to 16.7% with novel film strips.

Conclusions

Intermittent subcutaneous injections remain the most reliable and safest route of apomorphine administration, with an efficacy for off period treatment supported by nearly four decades of clinical experience.

The Experience of OFF Periods in Parkinson's Disease: Descriptions, Triggers, and Alleviating Factors

Purpose

Wearing off of Parkinson's disease medication is common, but triggers and coping strategies for this transient phenomenon are poorly understood. We aimed to assess the lived experience of OFF periods for people with Parkinson's disease.

Methods

Participants in the longitudinal Fox Insight study who endorsed OFF periods were invited to complete a survey consisting of both multiple-choice and free-text responses. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize multiple-choice responses, and free-text responses were classified into themes through iterative discussion by 3 movement disorders specialists.

Results

A total of 2110 participants (52.4% male) completed the survey. Tremor was the most common description of OFF periods (n=1038, 49.2%), followed by gait changes (n=535, 25.4%) and rigidity (n=430, 20.4%). Of 1498 specific triggers for OFF symptoms, the most common was stress (n=920, 61.4%), followed by anxiety/depression (n=476, 31.8%) and tiredness/fatigue (n=351, 23.4%). Common coping strategies (n=1416 responses) included exercise (n=678, 47.9%), taking a break (n=504, 35.6%), and meditation (n=276, 19.5%).

Conclusions

Although OFF periods are common, the individual experiences of OFF vary. This knowledge could be used to develop new counseling strategies for OFF periods in people with Parkinson's disease.

Accurate Monitoring of Parkinson's Disease Symptoms With a Wearable Device During COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

Accurate assessment of symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) is essential for optimal treatment decisions. During the past few years, different monitoring modalities have started to be used in the everyday clinical practice, mainly for the evaluation of motor symptoms. However, monitoring technologies for PD have not yet gained wide acceptance among physicians, patients, and caregivers. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the patients' access to healthcare, bringing to the forefront the need for wearable sensors, which provide effective remote symptoms' evaluation and follow-up.

CASE REPORT

We report two cases with PD, whose symptoms were monitored with a new wearable CE-marked system (PDMonitor^®), enabling appropriate treatment modifications.

CONCLUSION

Objective assessment of the patient's motor symptoms in his daily home environment is essential for an accurate monitoring in PD and enhances treatment decisions.

Comparison of Laboratory and Daily-Life Gait Speed Assessment during ON and OFF States in Parkinson's Disease

Accurate assessment of Parkinson's disease (PD) ON and OFF states in the usual environment is essential for tailoring optimal treatments. Wearables facilitate measurements of gait in novel and unsupervised environments; however, differences between unsupervised and in-laboratory measures have been reported in PD. We aimed to investigate whether unsupervised gait speed discriminates medication states and which supervised tests most accurately represent home performance. In-lab gait speeds from different gait tasks were compared to home speeds of 27 PD patients at ON and OFF states using inertial sensors. Daily gait speed distribution was expressed in percentiles and walking bout (WB) length. Gait speeds differentiated ON and OFF states in the lab and the home. When comparing lab with home performance, ON assessments in the lab showed moderate-to-high correlations with faster gait speeds in unsupervised environment (r = 0.69; p < 0.001), associated with long WB. OFF gait assessments in the lab showed moderate correlation values with slow gait speeds during OFF state at home (r = 0.56; p = 0.004), associated with short WB. In-lab and daily assessments of gait speed with wearables capture additional integrative aspects of PD, reflecting different aspects of mobility. Unsupervised assessment using wearables adds complementary information to the clinical assessment of motor fluctuations in PD.

Experience and Impact of OFF Periods in Parkinson's Disease: A Survey of Physicians, Patients, and Carepartners

BACKGROUND

OFF periods impair quality of life in Parkinson's disease but the nature and degree of this impact is largely unquantified. Optimal treatment relies on assessing the experience and impact of these periods on patients and their carepartners.

OBJECTIVES

To understand the experience and impact of OFF periods on their lives.

METHODS

Informed by qualitative interviews we designed questionnaires and surveyed neurologists, people with Parkinson's disease and carepartners.

RESULTS

50 general neurologists, 50 movement disorder neurologists, 442 patients (median disease duration 5 years) and 97 carepartners were included. The most common OFF symptoms reported by patients and carepartners were stiffness, slowness of movement and changes in gait. Non-motor symptoms were less common. A higher proportion of carepartners reported each symptom. A minority of neurologists recognized pain, sweating and anxiety as possible symptoms of OFF periods. The three OFF symptoms most frequently designated as having great impact by people with Parkinson's disease were changes in gait, slowness and stiffness. In contrast, cognitive impairment was most frequently rated as having great impact on carepartners. OFF periods were reported to impact many aspects of the lives of both patients and carepartners.

CONCLUSIONS

In people with Parkinson's disease of under 10 years duration, motor symptoms of OFF periods predominate in impact, however cognitive impairment has great impact on carepartners. Education is needed for neurologists regarding the non-motor aspects of OFF. The importance of involving carepartners in the assessment regarding OFF periods is supported by the higher frequency of symptom reporting by carepartners, and the significant impact on their lives.

Gait speed in clinical and daily living assessments in Parkinson's disease patients: performance versus capacity

Gait speed often referred as the sixth vital sign is the most powerful biomarker of mobility. While a clinical setting allows the estimation of gait speed under controlled conditions that present functional capacity, gait speed in real-life conditions provides the actual performance of the patient. The goal of this study was to investigate objectively under what conditions during daily activities, patients perform as well as or better than in the clinic. To this end, we recruited 27 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and measured their gait speed by inertial measurement units through several walking tests in the clinic as well as their daily activities at home. By fitting a bimodal Gaussian model to their gait speed distribution, we found that on average, patients had similar modes in the clinic and during daily activities. Furthermore, we observed that the number of medication doses taken throughout the day had a moderate correlation with the difference between clinic and home. Performing a cycle-by-cycle analysis on gait speed during the home assessment, overall only about 3% of the strides had equal or greater gait speeds than the patients' capacity in the clinic. These strides were during long walking bouts (>1 min) and happened before noon, around 26 min after medication intake, reaching their maximum occurrence probability 3 h after Levodopa intake. These results open the possibility of better control of medication intake in PD by considering both functional capacity and continuous monitoring of gait speed during real-life conditions.

Characterization of Gastrointestinal Symptom Type and Severity in Parkinson's Disease: A Case-Control Study in an Australian Cohort

Background

While constipation is a well-known non-motor symptom which may precede the onset of the classical motor symptoms of PD, there have been few comprehensive studies of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in people with PD (PwP).

Objectives

To investigate the spectrum of GI symptoms in an Australian PwP cohort and their relationship to use of anti-parkinsonian medications dietary habits and smoking.

Methods

The prevalence and severity of GI symptoms were compared in a group of 163 PwP and 113 healthy control subjects using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). Corrected linear regression models were used to determine differences between PwP and controls, and to investigate the influence of different classes of anti-Parkinsonian medications.

Results

PwP reported a greater frequency of constipation and GI-associated illnesses when compared to healthy controls. Total GSRS scores (P < 0.0001), upper GI symptoms (P < 0.0001), and hypoactive GI Symptoms (P < 0.0001) were all significantly greater in the PD cohort than controls. Further analyses revealed a positive association between the use of anti-Parkinsonian medications and total GSRS scores (P < 0.001), as well as upper GI symptoms (P < 0.001) and hypoactive GI function (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

This study illustrates the frequency and array of GI symptoms in a large PD cohort. The findings indicate that anti-parkinsonian medications play an important role in the presentation and development of GI symptoms.

Communication About OFF Periods in Parkinson's Disease: A Survey of Physicians, Patients, and Carepartners

Background: OFF periods impair quality of life in Parkinson's disease and are often amenable to treatment. Optimal treatment decisions rely on effective communication between physicians, patients and carepartners regarding this highly variable and complex phenomenon. Little is published in the literature about communication about OFF periods.

Methods: Informed by interviews with physicians, patients and carepartners we designed questionnaires for each group. We surveyed these parties using an online platform to investigate the frequency, content and ease of communication about OFF periods and barriers and facilitators of communication with physicians.

Results: Fifty movement disorder neurologists, 50 general neurologists, 442 patients and 97 carepartners participated. A free-flowing dialogue is the mainstay of communication according to all parties. Motor aspects of OFF periods are discussed more frequently than non-motor aspects (90 vs. <50% according to both general neurologists and movement disorder neurologists). The most common physician-reported barriers to communication are patient cognitive impairment, patient difficulty recognizing OFF periods and poor patient understanding of OFF periods' relationship to medication timing. The barriers most commonly cited as major by patients were that they perceived OFF periods to be part of the disease (i.e., not a clinical aspect that could be improved by a physician), variability of symptoms, and difficulty in describing symptoms. The most commonly described facilitator (by physicians) was the input of a caregiver. Positively viewed but less commonly used facilitators included pre-visit questionnaires or diaries, digital apps and wearable devices to monitor fluctuations. The majority of patients and carepartners identified a free-flowing dialogue with their physicians and having an agenda as helpful facilitators of communication about OFF periods which they already use. The majority of both groups felt that keeping a diary and pre-visit questionnaires were potentially helpful facilitators that were not currently in use.

Conclusions: Perceived barriers and facilitators to communication about OFF periods are different between health care providers and receivers of health care. Modifiable barriers and facilitators that could be implemented were identified by both groups. Future research should develop and test strategies based on this input to optimize communication and thus clinical care for this common and debilitating problem.

Barriers and facilitators of communication about off periods in Parkinson's disease: Qualitative analysis of patient, carepartner, and physician Interviews

Background

Successful patient-physician communication is critical for improving health outcomes, but research regarding optimal communication practices in Parkinson’s disease is limited. The objective of the current study was to investigate barriers and facilitators of communication between persons with Parkinson’s disease, carepartners, and physicians, specifically in the setting of off periods, with the goal of identifying ways to improve patient-carepartner-physician communication.

Method

We interviewed persons with Parkinson’s, carepartners, and physicians (specialists and non-specialists) using a semi-structured questionnaire to identify and describe experiences, barriers, and facilitators relating to communication about off periods in Parkinson’s disease. We used a qualitative descriptive approach to analyze interview transcripts and compare themes between participating groups.

Results

Twenty persons with Parkinson’s and their carepartners and 20 physicians (10 specialists, 10 non-specialists) participated in interviews. Identified communication barriers included patient-level (e.g. cognitive impairment, reluctance to discuss symptoms), caregiver-level (e.g. caregiver absence), and physician-level (e.g. distraction by technology, lack of appreciation of the burden of off periods) factors. Other barriers included the challenging nature of off periods themselves. Positive physician characteristics such as empathy, respect, and taking time to listen were major facilitators of communication regarding off periods. Persons with Parkinson’s, carepartners, and physicians described using various tools (e.g. home diaries, questionnaires, mobile phone videos) to aid communication regarding off periods but participants identified a need for more formal educational materials.

Conclusions

Physicians caring for persons with Parkinson’s can improve communication through more patient-centered practice but there is a need for improved educational tools regarding off periods. Further research is needed to identify optimal strategies for communication about off periods and preferred approaches for off period education.