1
|
Aamodt WW, Kluger BM, Mirham M, Job A, Lettenberger SE, Mosley PE, Seshadri S. Caregiver Burden in Parkinson Disease: A Scoping Review of the Literature from 2017-2022. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2024; 37:96-113. [PMID: 37551798 PMCID: PMC10802092 DOI: 10.1177/08919887231195219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
Caregiver burden is a term that refers to the adverse effect of caregiving on the physical, emotional, social, spiritual, and financial well-being of the caregiver. Caregiver burden is associated with providing care to an individual with a chronic illness or disability, and the unique symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD) can amplify a patient's needs and reliance on others, leading to adverse outcomes for patients and their caregivers. In this scoping review of the literature from January 2017 through April 2022 that included 114 studies, we provide an updated, evidence-based summary of patient and caregiver-related factors that contribute to caregiver burden in PD. We also describe the impact of caregiver stress and burden on caregivers based on qualitative research studies and review recent interventions to mitigate burden. By providing clinical updates for practitioners, this review is designed to improve recognition of caregiver burden in the post-pandemic era and foster the development of targeted interventions to reduce caregiver burden in PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whitley W. Aamodt
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Translational Center of Excellence for Neuroepidemiology and Neurology Outcomes Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Benzi M. Kluger
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Miray Mirham
- School of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Anna Job
- University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Philip E. Mosley
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Sandhya Seshadri
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Navarta-Sánchez MV, Palmar-Santos A, Pedraz-Marcos A, Reidy C, Soilemezi D, Haahr A, Sørensen D, Smidt HR, Bragstad LK, Hjelle EG, Haavaag SB, Portillo MC. Perspectives of people with Parkinson's disease and family carers about disease management in community settings: A cross-country qualitative study. J Clin Nurs 2023. [PMID: 36732059 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
AIM To explore perceptions of people with Parkinson's disease and family carers about the use and impact of health and social care services, community and voluntary sector resources for the management of Parkinson's disease. BACKGROUND Resources from outside the formal health care system and collaborations between different levels and sectors could address the unmet needs of people with Parkinson's disease and their family carers and improve the management of Parkinson's disease in the community setting. DESIGN A qualitative exploratory study was carried out in Denmark, Norway, Spain and the United Kingdom and was reported using the COREQ. METHODS Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with people with Parkinson's disease and family carers between May and August 2020. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. A meta-ethnographic approach was used to analyse and synthesise cross-national findings. RESULTS Forty-seven people with Parkinson's disease and 39 family carers participated in the four countries. Four themes and eight sub-themes emerged: (1) Personalised care for needs throughout the Parkinson's disease journey; (2) Accessibility of different types of support systems (including initiatives to support emotional well-being, physical rehabilitation, information on the healthcare services, voluntary associations and community groups); (3) Multiagency collaborations, a more comprehensive approach; (4) Acknowledgment of people with Parkinson's and family carers own role in Parkinson's disease management. CONCLUSIONS An integrated and person-and-community-centred approach, which includes the participation of the health, social, voluntary and community sectors, is desired by people with Parkinson's disease and their family carers to improve the management of Parkinson's in the community setting. These findings could contribute to the creation of more sustainable care systems at the European level that would better respond to individual and changing needs in people with Parkinson's disease and their family carers, and in other long-term conditions. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION The Patient and Public Involvement groups contributed to the design of the study, the interview guides and validation of findings. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE This study will inform the management of Parkinson's disease at the community level and the use of resources not only directly linked to the health system. Taking into account all the actors that provide care and support to people with Parkinson' disease and family carers facilitates the creation of strategies that better respond to individual needs. Nurses and other health and social care professionals in the community and specialist levels of care should collaborate to develop multisectoral strategies that promote personalised and integrated care throughout the Parkinson's journey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ana Palmar-Santos
- Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Claire Reidy
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dia Soilemezi
- Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Anita Haahr
- Research Centre for Health and Welfare Technology, Programme for Rehabilitation, VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark.,Nursing and Healthcare, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Dorthe Sørensen
- Research Centre for Health and Welfare Technology, Programme for Rehabilitation, VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Helle Rønn Smidt
- Research Centre for Health and Welfare Technology, Programme for Rehabilitation, VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Line Kildal Bragstad
- Department of Public Health Sciences and CHARM - Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ellen Gabrielsen Hjelle
- Department of Public Health Sciences and CHARM - Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Mari Carmen Portillo
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, University of Southampton, School of Health Sciences, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Care partner support. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2023; 191:203-219. [PMID: 36599509 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-824535-4.00014-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Palliative care focuses on improving the quality of life of people living with serious illness and their family carers. However despite policy, clinical, and research evidence underpinning the importance of a family approach to care, as well as justification for early palliative care integration, systemic inadequacies have impeded the quality of family support. This chapter provides an overview of common concepts in caregiving, a framework through which carer well-being can be understood, and an overview of disease specific considerations for care partners. There are several main needs that are relevant to care partners across disease settings include (1) information and guidance to prepare them for the role; (2) how to alleviate discomfort for the person with illness; (3) enhancing skills for the physical tasks of the role; (4) strategies for managing the psychological, and financial implications of the care partner role; and (5) assistance in advance care planning and on preparing for the care recipient's death. Care partner coping is a result of complex interactions between stressors and mediators as they navigate chronic illness, but palliative providers with an understanding of these factors are well-positioned to address carer risk factors and provide appropriate support.
Collapse
|
4
|
Fleisher JE, Suresh M, Klostermann EC, Lee J, Hess SP, Myrick E, Mitchem D, Woo K, Sennott BJ, Witek NP, Chen SM, Beck JC, Ouyang B, Wilkinson JR, Hall DA, Chodosh J. IN-HOME-PDCaregivers: The effects of a combined home visit and peer mentoring intervention for caregivers of homebound individuals with advanced Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2023; 106:105222. [PMID: 36446676 PMCID: PMC9825655 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Family caregivers of people with advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) are at high risk of caregiver strain, which independently predicts adverse patient outcomes. We tested the effects of one year of interdisciplinary, telehealth-enhanced home visits (IN-HOME-PD) with 16 weeks of peer mentoring on caregiver strain compared with usual care. METHODS We enrolled homebound people with advanced PD (PWPD) and their primary caregiver as IN-HOME-PD dyads. We trained experienced PD family caregivers as peer mentors. Dyads received four structured home visits focused on advanced symptom management, home safety, medications, and psychosocial needs. Starting at approximately four months, caregivers spoke weekly with a peer mentor for 16 weeks. We compared one-year change in caregiver strain (MCSI, range 0-72) with historical controls, analyzed intervention acceptability, and measured change in anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy. RESULTS Longitudinally, IN-HOME-PD caregiver strain was unchanged (n = 51, 23.34 (SD 9.43) vs. 24.32 (9.72), p = 0.51) while that of controls worsened slightly (n = 154, 16.45 (10.33) vs. 17.97 (10.88), p = 0.01). Retention in peer mentoring was 88.2%. Both mentors and mentees rated 100% of mentoring calls useful, with mean satisfaction of 91/100 and 90/100, respectively. There were no clinically significant improvements in anxiety, depression, or self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS Interdisciplinary telehealth-enhanced home visits combined with peer mentoring mitigated the worsening strain observed in caregivers of less advanced individuals. Mentoring was met with high satisfaction. Future caregiver-led peer mentoring interventions are warranted given the growing, unmet needs of PD family caregivers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03189459.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jori E Fleisher
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Madhuvanthi Suresh
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Ellen C Klostermann
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Jeanette Lee
- Department of Social Work and Community Health, Rush University Medical Center, 710 South Paulina Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Serena P Hess
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Erica Myrick
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Daniela Mitchem
- Department of Social Work and Community Health, Rush University Medical Center, 710 South Paulina Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Katheryn Woo
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Brianna J Sennott
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Natalie P Witek
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Sarah Mitchell Chen
- Department of Social Work and Community Health, Rush University Medical Center, 710 South Paulina Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - James C Beck
- Parkinson's Foundation, 1359 Broadway, Suite 1509, New York, NY, 10018, USA.
| | - Bichun Ouyang
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Jayne R Wilkinson
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Deborah A Hall
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Joshua Chodosh
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 227 E. 30th Street, TRB 839, New York, NY, 10016, USA; VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, Medicine Service, 423 E. 23rd Street, New York, NY, 10010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Macchi ZA, Seshadri S, Ayele R, Bock M, Long J, Coats H, Miyasaki J, Pantilat SZ, Katz M, Santos EJ, Sillau SH, Lum HD, Kluger BM. Aggression Towards Caregivers in Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders: A Mixed Methods Study. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2022; 9:920-931. [PMID: 36247911 PMCID: PMC9547131 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Aggression is one manifestation of behavioral disturbances in neurodegenerative disease with emerging literature suggesting a high prevalence in Parkinson's disease and related disorders (PDRD). Objectives Our aim was to describe characteristics, associated factors, and consequences of aggression towards caregivers in PDRD. Methods This is a convergent mixed methods study, leveraging data from 296 PDRD patient-caregiver dyads in a clinical trial of palliative care and semi-structured interviews with a subgroup of 14 caregivers who reported aggression. The primary outcome was baseline caregiver-reported aggression. Using multivariate linear regression, baseline dyad characteristics (eg, measures of disease, psychosocial issues, caregiver strain) were examined to identify factors associated with aggression. Thematic analysis of interviews was used to augment these findings. Results Associated variables included disease duration (r = 0.15, P < 0.05), patient grief (r = 0.22, P< 0.001), symptom burden (r = 0.18, r < 0.01), resistance to care (r = 0.40, P < 0.01), caregivers' depression (r = 0.16, P < 0.05), and caregiving burden (r = 0.34, P < 0.001). We identified five themes: (1) Aggressive behaviors range from verbal abuse to threats of physical violence; (2) Caregivers believe that aggressive behaviors result from the difficulty patients experience in coping with disease progression and related losses; (3) Caregivers' stress and mental health are worsened by aggressive behaviors; (4) Aggressive behaviors negatively affect patient-caregiver relationships; (5) Caregivers are ill-prepared to manage aggressive behaviors and cope with the consequences on their own. Conclusions Aggression in PDRD is driven by diverse factors (eg, grief, fluctuations in cognition) with serious consequences for caregivers. Neurologists and movement specialists should consider screening for aggression while prioritizing caregiver education and wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary A. Macchi
- Behavioral Neurology|Neuropalliative Sections, Department of NeurologyUniversity of Colorado AnschutzAuroraColoradoUSA
| | - Sandhya Seshadri
- Department of Neurology and MedicineUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Roman Ayele
- Denver‐Seattle Center of Innovation at Eastern Colorado VA Healthcare SystemDenverColoradoUSA
| | - Meredith Bock
- Weill Institute for NeuroscienceUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- San Francisco Veteran's Affairs Health Care SystemSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Judith Long
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of MedicineUniversity of California, San FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Heather Coats
- College of NursingUniversity of Colorado AnschutzAuroraColoradoUSA
| | - Janis Miyasaki
- Division of Neurology, Department of MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonAlbertaCanada
| | - Steven Z. Pantilat
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of MedicineUniversity of California, San FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Maya Katz
- Department of Neurology and Neurological SciencesStanford University School of MedicinePalo AltoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Elizabeth J. Santos
- Division of Geriatric Mental Health and Memory CareUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and DentistryRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Stefan H. Sillau
- Behavioral Neurology|Neuropalliative Sections, Department of NeurologyUniversity of Colorado AnschutzAuroraColoradoUSA
| | - Hillary D. Lum
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of MedicineUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineAuroraColoradoUSA
| | - Benzi M. Kluger
- Behavioral Neurology|Neuropalliative Sections, Department of NeurologyUniversity of Colorado AnschutzAuroraColoradoUSA
- Department of Neurology and MedicineUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kehagia AA, North TK, Grose J, Jeffery AN, Cocking L, Chapman R, Carroll C. Enhancing Trial Delivery in Parkinson’s Disease: Qualitative Insights from PD STAT. JOURNAL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2022; 12:1591-1604. [PMID: 35466952 PMCID: PMC9398073 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-212987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background: Recruitment and retention of participants in clinical trials for Parkinson’s disease (PD) is challenging. A qualitative study embedded in the PD STAT multi-centre randomised controlled trial of simvastatin for neuroprotection in PD explored the motivators, barriers and challenges of participants, care partners and research staff. Objective: To outline a set of considerations informing a patient-centred approach to trial recruitment, retention, and delivery. Method: We performed semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a subset of trial participants and their care partners. Quantitative and qualitative data were obtained through surveys circulated among the 235 participants across 23 UK sites at the beginning, middle and end of the 2-year trial. We also interviewed and surveyed research staff at trial closure. Results: Twenty-seven people with PD, 6 care partners and 9 researchers participated in interviews and focus groups. A total of 463 trial participant survey datasets were obtained across three timepoints, and 53 staff survey datasets at trial closure. Trial participants discussed the physical and psychological challenges they faced, especially in the context of OFF state assessments, relationships, and communication with research staff. Care partners shared their insights into OFF state challenges, and the value of being heard by research teams. Research staff echoed many concerns with suggestions on flexible, person-centred approaches to maximising convenience, comfort, and privacy. Conclusion: These considerations, in favour of person-centred research protocols informed by the variable needs of participants, care partners and staff, could be developed into a set of recommendations for future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angie A. Kehagia
- University College Hospital, University London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
- University of Plymouth, Faculty of Health, Plymouth, Devon, UK
| | - Tracie K. North
- University of Plymouth, Faculty of Health, Plymouth, Devon, UK
| | - Jane Grose
- University of Plymouth, Faculty of Health, Plymouth, Devon, UK
| | | | - Laura Cocking
- University of Plymouth, Faculty of Health, Plymouth, Devon, UK
| | - Rebecca Chapman
- University of Plymouth, Faculty of Health, Plymouth, Devon, UK
| | - Camille Carroll
- University of Plymouth, Faculty of Health, Plymouth, Devon, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Leung T, Akram F, Lee J, Klostermann EC, Hess SP, Myrick E, Levin M, Ouyang B, Wilkinson J, Hall D, Chodosh J. Peer Mentoring Program for Informal Caregivers of Homebound Individuals With Advanced Parkinson Disease (Share the Care): Protocol for a Single-Center, Crossover Pilot Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e34750. [PMID: 35481819 PMCID: PMC9185354 DOI: 10.2196/34750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Homebound individuals with advanced Parkinson disease (PD) require intensive caregiving, the majority of which is provided by informal, family caregivers. PD caregiver strain is an independent risk factor for institutionalization. There are currently no effective interventions to support advanced PD caregivers. Studies in other neurologic disorders, however, have demonstrated the potential for peer mentoring interventions to improve caregiver outcomes. In the context of an ongoing trial of interdisciplinary home visits, we designed and piloted a nested trial of caregiver peer mentoring for informal caregivers of individuals with advanced PD. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of peer mentoring for caregivers of homebound individuals with advanced PD and to evaluate its effects on anxiety, depression, and caregiver strain. METHODS This was a single-center, 16-week pilot study of caregiver peer mentoring nested within a year-long controlled trial of interdisciplinary home visits. We recruited 34 experienced former or current family caregivers who completed structured mentor training. Caregivers enrolled in the larger interdisciplinary home visit trial consented to receive 16 weeks of weekly, one-to-one peer mentoring calls with a trained peer mentor. Weekly calls were guided by a curriculum on advanced PD management and caregiver support. Fidelity to and satisfaction with the intervention were gathered via biweekly study diaries. Anxiety, depression, and caregiver strain were measured pre- and postmentoring intervention at home visits 2 and 3. RESULTS Enrollment and peer-mentor training began in 2018, and 65 caregivers enrolled in the overarching trial. The majority of mentors and mentees were White, female spouses or partners of individuals with PD; mentors had a mean of 8.7 (SD 6.4) years of caregiving experience, and 33 mentors were matched with at least 1 mentee. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study of caregiver peer mentoring in PD and may establish an adaptable and sustainable model for disease-specific caregiver interventions in PD and other neurodegenerative diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03189459; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03189459. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/34750.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Erica Myrick
- RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, Chicago, US.,Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, US
| | - Melissa Levin
- RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, 1725 w Harrison St., Chicago, US.,Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, US
| | - Bichun Ouyang
- RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, 1725 w Harrison St., Chicago, US
| | - Jayne Wilkinson
- RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, 1725 w Harrison St., Chicago, US.,Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, US
| | - Deborah Hall
- RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, 1725 w Harrison St., Chicago, US
| | - Joshua Chodosh
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 227 E. 30th St.TRB 839, New York, US.,VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, Medicine Service, New York, US
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen Y, Zhou W, Hou L, Zhang X, Wang Q, Gu J, Zhang R, Yang H. The subjective experience of family caregivers of people living with Parkinson's disease: a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature. Aging Clin Exp Res 2022; 34:959-970. [PMID: 34648175 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-021-01995-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Parkinson's disease patients (PwPD) rely heavily on their family caregivers. However, there remains uncertainty regarding the subjective experience of the family caregivers of PwPD. This study aims to provide an in-depth summary of the current knowledge about the subjective experiences of family caregivers caring for PwPD, to understand the factors that influence this experience and to provide the evidence for healthcare services. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-ethnography using Noblit and Hare's approach. The search strategy used MeSH terms in combination with free-text searching of 10 databases (from their inception until July 2021). Titles and abstracts were reviewed by two reviewers and, for the studies that met the eligibility criteria, full-text articles were obtained. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklist was employed to assess the quality of studies. RESULTS A total of 3318 studies were screened and 29 qualitative studies were included in this review. These studies recorded the experience of 399 participants across 12 countries, most were females. Five themes emerged: (a) feelings related to PD; (b) challenges to family life; (c) external challenges; (d) adjustment and adaptation; (e) external support. We propose a new conceptual model that highlights that the experiences of caregivers for PwPD are dynamic and influenced by a variety of internal and external factors. CONCLUSION Our findings illustrate the complex and dynamic experiences of family caregivers for PwPD. It is necessary to explore how the influencing factors can be modified to improve the lived experience of family caregivers.
Collapse
|
9
|
Caregiver Burden in Partners of Parkinsonian Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12020238. [PMID: 35204001 PMCID: PMC8870343 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12020238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
In Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients, the progressive nature of the disease and the variability of disabling motor and non-motor symptoms contribute to the growing caregiver burden of PD partners and conflicts in their relationships. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) improves PD symptoms and patients’ quality of life but necessitates an intensified therapy optimization after DBS surgery. This review illuminates caregiver burden in the context of DBS, framing both pre- and postoperative aspects. We aim to provide an overview of perioperative factors influencing caregiver burden and wish to stimulate further recognition of caregiver burden of PD patients with DBS.
Collapse
|