Systematic evaluation of augmentation during treatment with ropinirole in restless legs syndrome (Willis-Ekbom Disease): Results from a prospective, multicenter study over 66 weeks

Rethinking clinical trials in restless legs syndrome: A roadmap

The number of large clinical trials of restless legs syndrome (RLS) have decreased in recent years, this coincides with reduced interest in developing and testing novel pharmaceuticals. Therefore, the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) formed a task force of global experts to examine the causes of these trends and make recommendations to facilitate new clinical trials. In our article, we delve into potential complications linked to the diagnostic definition of RLS, identify subpopulations necessitating more attention, and highlight issues pertaining to endpoints and study frameworks. In particular, we recommend developing alternative scoring methods for more accurate RLS diagnosis, thereby improving clinical trial specificity. Furthermore, enhancing the precision of endpoints will increase study effect sizes and mitigate study costs. Suggestions to achieve this include developing online, real-time sleep diaries with high-frequency sampling of nightly sleep latency and the use of PLMs as surrogate markers. Furthermore, to reduce the placebo response, strategies should be adopted that include placebo run-in periods. As RLS is frequently a chronic condition, priority should be given to long-term studies, using a randomized, placebo-controlled, withdrawal design. Lastly, new populations should be investigated to develop targeted treatments such as mild RLS, pregnancy, hemodialysis, or iron-deficient anemia.

Exploring the causes of augmentation in restless legs syndrome

Long-term drug treatment for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) patients can frequently result in augmentation, which is the deterioration of symptoms with an increased drug dose. The cause of augmentation, especially derived from dopamine therapy, remains elusive. Here, we review recent research and clinical progress on the possible mechanism underlying RLS augmentation. Dysfunction of the dopamine system highly possibly plays a role in the development of RLS augmentation, as dopamine agonists improve desensitization of dopamine receptors, disturb receptor interactions within or outside the dopamine receptor family, and interfere with the natural regulation of dopamine synthesis and release in the neural system. Iron deficiency is also indicated to contribute to RLS augmentation, as low iron levels can affect the function of the dopamine system. Furthermore, genetic risk factors, such as variations in the BTBD9 and MEIS1 genes, have been linked to an increased risk of RLS initiation and augmentation. Additionally, circadian rhythm, which controls the sleep-wake cycle, may also contribute to the worsening of RLS symptoms and the development of augmentation. Recently, Vitamin D deficiency has been suggested to be involved in RLS augmentation. Based on these findings, we propose that the progressive reduction of selective receptors, influenced by various pathological factors, reverses the overcompensation of the dopamine intensity promoted by short-term, low-dose dopaminergic therapy in the development of augmentation. More research is needed to uncover a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying the RLS symptom and to develop effective RLS augmentation treatments.

Hydrotherapy and acupressure in restless legs syndrome: A randomized, controlled, 3-armed, explorative clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common neurological disease that has a significant impact on daily activities and quality of life, for which there is often no satisfactory therapy. Complementary medicine, such as acupressure and hydrotherapy, is used to treat patients with RLS; however, the clinical evidence is unclear. This study aims to investigate the effects and feasibility of self-administered hydrotherapy and acupressure in patients with RLS.

METHODS

This is a randomized, controlled, open-label, exploratory, clinical study with 3 parallel arms, comparing both self-applied hydrotherapy (according to the German non-medical naturopath Sebastian Kneipp) and acupressure in addition to routine care in comparison to routine care alone (waiting list control) in patients with RLS. Fifty-one patients with at least moderate restless-legs syndrome will be randomized. Patients in the hydrotherapy group will be trained in the self-application of cold knee/lower leg affusions twice daily for 6 weeks. The acupressure group will be trained in the self-application of 6-point-acupressure therapy once daily for 6 weeks. Both interventions take approximately 20 minutes daily. The 6-week mandatory study intervention phase, which is in addition to the patient preexisting routine care treatment, is followed by a 6-week follow-up phase with optional interventions. The waitlist group will not receive any study intervention in addition to their routine care before the end of week 12. Outcome parameters including RLS-severity, disease and health-related quality of life (RLS-QoL, SF-12), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score in German version, general self-efficacy scale, and study intervention safety will be measured at baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks. The statistical analyses will be descriptive and exploratory.

CONCLUSION

In the case of clinically relevant therapeutic effects, feasibility, and therapeutic safety, the results will be the basis for planning a future confirmatory randomized trial and for helping to develop further RLS self-treatment concepts.

Restless legs syndrome: Over 50 years of European contribution

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a sensorimotor neurological disorder characterised by an urge to move the limbs with a circadian pattern (occurring in the evening/at night), more prominent at rest, and relieved with movements. RLS is one of the most prevalent sleep disorders, occurring in 5%-10% of the European population. Thomas Willis first described RLS clinical cases already in the 17th century, and Karl-Axel Ekbom described the disease as a modern clinical entity in the 20th century. Despite variable severity, RLS can markedly affect sleep (partly through the presence of periodic leg movements) and quality of life, with a relevant socio-economic impact. Thus, its recognition and treatment are essential. However, screening methods present limitations and should be improved. Moreover, available RLS treatment options albeit providing sustained relief to many patients are limited in number. Additionally, the development of augmentation with dopamine agonists represents a major treatment problem. A better understanding of RLS pathomechanisms can bring to light novel treatment possibilities. With emerging new avenues of research in pharmacology, imaging, genetics, and animal models of RLS, this is an interesting and constantly growing field of research. This review will update the reader on the current state of RLS clinical practice and research, with a special focus on the contribution of European researchers.

The Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacological Treatments for Restless Legs Syndrome: Systemic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Although various drugs are currently used for restless legs syndrome (RLS) in clinic, selecting appropriate drugs for patients is difficult. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different drugs. After literature searching and screening, 46 trials, including 10,674 participants are included in this NMA. The pooled results showed that, compared with placebo, only levodopa is inefficient to relieve symptoms of RLS. Cabergoline decreases IRLS scores to the greatest extent among all drugs (MD −11.98, 95% CI −16.19 to −7.78). Additionally, pramipexole is superior to ropinirole in alleviating symptoms of RLS (MD −2.52, 95% CI −4.69 to −0.35). Moreover, iron supplement alleviates RLS symptoms significantly compared with placebo in patient with iron deficiency (MD −5.15, 95% CI −8.99 to −1.31), but not for RLS patients with normal serum ferritin level (MD −2.22, 95% CI −6.99 to 2.56). For primary RLS, these drugs are also effective, while there is insufficient data to analyze drug efficacy in secondary RLS. We analyzed risk of common adverse effects of drugs including nausea, somnolence, fatigue, headache and nasopharyngitis. Alpha-2-delta ligands and DAs are favorable choices for both primary and secondary RLS because of their significant efficacy and good tolerability. Iron supplement can significantly alleviate symptoms of RLS patients with iron deficiency than placebo. We recommend gabapentin, gabapentin enacarbil, and pregabalin for clinicians for first consideration mainly because that they rarely cause augmentation. Oxycodone-naloxone could be considered in patients with severe or very severe RLS who failed in treatment with above drugs.

Restless legs syndrome

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common sensorimotor disorder characterized by an urge to move that appears during rest or is exacerbated by rest, that occurs in the evening or night and that disappears during movement or is improved by movement. Symptoms vary considerably in age at onset, frequency and severity, with severe forms affecting sleep, quality of life and mood. Patients with RLS often display periodic leg movements during sleep or resting wakefulness. RLS is considered to be a complex condition in which predisposing genetic factors, environmental factors and comorbidities contribute to the expression of the disorder. RLS occurs alone or with comorbidities, for example, iron deficiency and kidney disease, but also with cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus and neurological, rheumatological and respiratory disorders. The pathophysiology is still unclear, with the involvement of brain iron deficiency, dysfunction in the dopaminergic and nociceptive systems and altered adenosine and glutamatergic pathways as hypotheses being investigated. RLS is poorly recognized by physicians and it is accordingly often incorrectly diagnosed and managed. Treatment guidelines recommend initiation of therapy with low doses of dopamine agonists or α₂δ ligands in severe forms. Although dopaminergic treatment is initially highly effective, its long-term use can result in a serious worsening of symptoms known as augmentation. Other treatments include opioids and iron preparations.

Restless Legs Syndrome: Challenges to Treatment

For a long time, dopaminergic treatment (DT) was the medication for restless legs syndrome. Although DT is effective and safe over the short-term, complications develop over longer periods, including augmentation, tolerance, and impulse control disorders. Nowadays, it is recommended that first-line treatment should be alpha-2 ligands, which are more effective in the absence of previous DT. As a second-line treatment, opioids, such as oxycodone extended-release with naloxone, are approved in Europe. Brain iron should be monitored before and during treatment and corrected if necessary. Two new promising non-DTs are being developed: perampanel and dipyridamole. More research is needed.

Augmentation in patients with restless legs syndrome receiving pramipexole therapy: a retrospective study in a single center from China

PURPOSE

Augmentation is a major complication of long-term pramipexole treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS). However, there have been no studies on augmentation in Chinese patients with RLS. We therefore investigated the clinical characteristics of augmentation in RLS patients treated with pramipexole in a real-world Chinese setting.

METHODS

This study was an observational, retrospective assessment of 103 patients with RLS, who had been continuously treated with pramipexole for at least one month between January 2016 and December 2018 in a tertiary hospital in East China. Demographic data and disease and drug treatment information were collected from electronic medical records and telephone interviews to analyze the rate and clinical features of augmentation. Augmentation was confirmed by Max Planck Institute criteria. Comparisons were made between patients with and without augmentation.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (15%) were classified as having augmentation. Compared to RLS patients without augmentation, more patients with augmentation switched from other dopaminergic drugs (P<0.05) and had a longer duration of RLS symptoms before pramipexole treatment (P<0.05). In addition, patients with augmentation had a longer duration (P<0.05) and higher dosage (P<0.05) of pramipexole than those without augmentation. Augmentation was possibly associated with pramipexole tolerance (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The augmentation rate of the Chinese RLS patients in our study was 15%. Augmentation may be associated with switching from other dopaminergic drugs, long disease duration before pramipexole use, the dose and duration of pramipexole, and tolerance to pramipexole.

Exploratory cross-over, trial of augmented RLS with the dopamine receptor 1/5 antagonist ecopipam D1/D5 antagonist ecopipam for augmented RLS

BACKGROUND

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common condition that initially responds dramatically to dopaminergic therapy. Over time, however, dopaminergics cause augmentation, where symptoms occur earlier and intensify. Animal models suggest this may result from increased dopamine receptor type-1 affinity in the spinal cord. Ecopipam is a potent, specific dopamine-1/5 receptor antagonist.

METHODS

We performed a small (N = 10) exploratory placebo controlled, cross-over safety trial of ecopipam (25-100 mg/day) for patients with augmented RLS currently taking dopamine agonists.

RESULTS

Ecopipam was well tolerated with sedation being the most common adverse event in drug and placebo. Safety scales and serology data were similar to placebo. The study was not powered to demonstrate efficacy and exploratory efficacy data showed no significant improvement compared to placebo, but RLS diaries, the international RLS rating scale, and clinical global impressions all favored drug. No subject worsened on drug or demonstrated rebound worsening after drug discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Ecopipam was safe and well tolerated in this initial study for RLS. Given the lack of alternate options, larger efficacy studies for augmented RLS, and potentially de novo RLS are justified.

Non-dopaminergic vs. dopaminergic treatment options in restless legs syndrome

Two types of drugs have been extensively investigated for the treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS)/Willis-Ekbom disease (WED): dopamine agonists and α2δ ligands to the α2δ subunit of calcium channels. Comparative studies show that both classes of drugs are similarly effective in treating RLS symptoms over the short- and long-term. While dopamine agonists are more effective in treating periodic limb movements (PLMs), α2δ ligands are more effective in consolidating sleep. However, given the fact that dopamine agonists cause high rates of augmentation of symptoms, recent international guidelines recommend that whenever possible the initial treatment of choice should be an α2δ ligand. In fact, the most effective preventive strategy involves not using dopaminergic agents unless absolutely necessary. Indeed, should dopaminergic treatment be needed to handle the symptoms effectively, then it is recommended that the dopaminergic load be reduced by using the lowest effective dose for the shortest possible period of time. However, it must be taken into account that the only α2δ ligand approved for RLS/WED is gabapentin enacarbil, which is not yet available in Europe. Furthermore, recent studies have also reported on the efficacy of opioids as a second-line treatment of RLS/WED, following treatment failure with dopamine agonists. Recent guidelines have taken these new data into account and highlight that a low dose of an opioid (prolonged-release oxycodone or methadone) may be considered in patients with very severe augmentation of symptoms. Alternative non-dopaminergic treatment concepts based on glutamatergic and adenosinergic mechanisms are currently in development, and are likely to provide encouraging therapeutic alternatives.

Switching from an oral dopamine receptor agonist to rotigotine transdermal patch: a review of clinical data with a focus on patient perspective

INTRODUCTION

Dopamine receptor agonists (DAs) are commonly used to treat Parkinson's disease (PD) and restless legs syndrome (RLS). In certain situations, switching from oral DAs to rotigotine transdermal patch may be beneficial for the patient (e.g., optimal symptom control/side effects/perioperative management, preference for once-daily/non-oral administration, RLS augmentation treatment). Areas covered: This narrative review summarizes available data on DA dose equivalency, dose conversions, switching schedules, safety, tolerability, efficacy and patient treatment preferences of switching from oral DAs to rotigotine (and vice versa) in patients with PD/RLS. The studies were identified in a PubMed search (up to 8 November 2016) using terms ('dopamine receptor agonist' OR 'rotigotine') AND 'switch'. Expert commentary: Randomized controlled studies often do not address the challenges clinicians face in practice, e.g., switching medications within the same class when dosing is not a one-to-one ratio. The authors describe three open-label studies in PD where oral DAs were successfully switched to rotigotine, and review three studies in RLS where oral DAs/levodopa were switched to rotigotine. Finally, the authors provide a suggested tool for switching from oral DAs to rotigotine, which includes dose conversion factors and switching schedules. The authors' view is that low-dose oral DAs (equivalent to ≤8 mg/24 h rotigotine) may be switched overnight.

French consensus: Augmentation syndrome in restless legs syndrome

Augmentation syndrome is one of the most severe complications of RLS. It is characterised by a worsening of treated symptoms; principally an increase in the severity of symptoms and an earlier onset time. Augmentation syndrome occurs primarily with dopaminergic treatments. It is crucial for the patient to be sufficiently well informed to prevent its occurrence and the prescription of too high doses of dopaminergic agonists avoided. In the presence of augmentation syndrome confirmed using the diagnostic criteria, the specialist treating the restless legs syndrome should quickly modify the patient's treatment. In this article, our expert group proposes a practical strategy for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of augmentation syndrome.

Rate of augmentation and risk factors with long-term follow-up in Japanese patients with restless legs syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Preventing augmentation is the critical clinical issue for RLS treatment. As for augmentation in Asian RLS patients, there have been only four studies and the follow-up durations of these studies were not long. We investigated Japanese RLS patients with longer duration of treatment in a clinical setting.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective assessment of 42 RLS patients with follow-up durations of longer than 18 months (78.4 ± 29.2, range 19-139) at two urban sleep centers in Osaka, Japan from May 2004 to April 2014.

RESULTS

The mean age of first visit was 63.5 ± 14.1 years old and the estimated age of RLS onset was 47.9 ± 16.5 years old. Twenty-eight out of 42 patients were female. At initial evaluation, the mean International Restless Legs Scale score (IRLS score) was 22.0 ± 5.9. Thirty-one of 42 had already visited other clinics before coming to our sleep centers, and the number of clinics visited was 1.3 ± 0.6. Augmentation developed in two patients (4.8%), and the dosage of dopamine equivalent in patients with and without augmentation was 12.5 and 18.8 mg vs. 15.8 ± 17.7 mg. In the two RLS patients with augmentation, ferritin was 113.1 and 114.1 ng/mL, respectively, and the number of clinics before coming to our sleep centers was both three.

CONCLUSIONS

The augmentation rate of Japanese RLS patients from our study is low compared with previous Western and Asian studies. It might be attributable to racial difference, lower dosage of dopaminergic treatment, and the level of ferritin.

The efficacy and tolerability of rotigotine on patients with periodic limb movement in sleep: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

There is still no consensus on the treatment for periodic limb movement in sleep (PLMS). This study aimed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of rotigotine in patients suffering from PLMS.

METHODS

Publications listed in PubMed, ScienceDirect, The Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were reviewed to assess the efficacy of rotigotine on PLMS. Analyses of PLMS frequency before and after rotigotine treatments (pre- and post-intervention studies) and PLMS frequency between placebo and rotigotine treatments (placebo-controlled trial studies) were included in our study. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Five publications involving 197 participants were included in this study. Among these articles, pre- and post-intervention data involving 55 participants were available from three articles, while placebo-controlled trial data from 107 participants receiving rotigotine and 70 participants receiving a placebo were available from an additional three articles. In the pre- and post-intervention studies, the periodic limb movement index was significantly decreased after therapy with rotigotine with a difference in means of -5.866/h (95% CI, -10.570 to -1.162, p = 0.015). In comparison with the placebo, the use of rotigotine significantly lowered the periodic limb movement index, with a difference in means of -32.105/h (95% CI, -42.539 to -21.671, p < 0.001), reduced the PLMS with arousal index, with a difference in means of -7.160/h (95% CI, -9.310 to -5.010, p < 0.001), and increased the withdrawal rate, with an odds ratio of 3.421 (95% CI, 1.230 to 9.512, p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis revealed the considerable efficacy of rotigotine in alleviating the frequency of PLMS. However, the high withdrawal rate should be taken into account.

Restless Legs Syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis and a practical approach to management

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a chronic neurological disorder that interferes with rest and sleep. It has a wide spectrum of symptom severity, and treatment is started when symptoms become bothersome. Dopamine agonists and calcium channel apha-2-delta antagonists (gabapentin, gabapentin enacarbil and pregabalin) are first-line treatments; calcium channel alpha-2-deltas are preferred over dopamine agonists because they give less augmentation, a condition with symptom onset earlier in the day and intensification of RLS symptoms. Dopamine agonists can still be used as first-line therapy, but the dose should be kept as low as possible. Iron supplements are started when the serum ferritin concentration is ≤75 µg/L, or if the transferrin saturation is less than 20%. For severe or resistant RLS, a combined treatment approach can be effective. Augmentation can be very challenging to treat and lacks evidenced-based guidelines.

Identification and treatment of augmentation in patients with restless legs syndrome: practical recommendations

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a chronic disorder causing clinically significant discomfort to approximately 3% of adults. Although RLS was first identified centuries ago, our understanding of this disorder, its causes, and its treatments is still evolving. In particular, our knowledge of the potential negative effects of RLS treatments, including dopaminergic augmentation, continues to expand. Augmentation, which refers to a paradoxical treatment-related increase in RLS symptoms, has been associated with all three dopamine agonists approved for the treatment of RLS - rotigotine, pramipexole, and ropinirole. This review presents key information on prevention and treatment of dopaminergic augmentation from the recently published consensus-based guidelines issued by the International RLS Study Group task force in conjunction with the European RLS Study Group and the RLS Foundation for first-line treatment of RLS/Willis-Ekbom disease. If dopamine agonists are used to treat RLS, it is recommended that the dosage should be kept as low as possible without exceeding the maximum dose recommended for RLS treatment. As the frequency of augmentation with the rotigotine patch may only be slightly lower than that associated with pramipexole or ropinirole, medications that are effective and have little risk of augmentation, such as alpha-2-delta ligands, may be considered for initial RLS treatment. In addition, we present our clinical experience with treating patients with dopaminergic augmentation by highlighting 2 case studies and practical considerations when treating different patient populations. Applying current RLS augmentation diagnosis and treatment guidelines, as well as collecting detailed histories of worsening RLS symptoms, is critical for patient safety and effective management of RLS augmentation.

Nerve Decompression and Restless Legs Syndrome: A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a prevalent sleep disorder affecting quality of life and is often comorbid with other neurological diseases, including peripheral neuropathy. The mechanisms related to RLS symptoms remain unclear, and treatment options are often aimed at symptom relief rather than etiology. RLS may present in distinct phenotypes often described as “primary” vs. “secondary” RLS. Secondary RLS is often associated with peripheral neuropathy. Nerve decompression surgery of the common and superficial fibular nerves is used to treat peripheral neuropathy. Anecdotally, surgeons sometimes report improved RLS symptoms following nerve decompression for peripheral neuropathy. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to quantify the change in symptoms commonly associated with RLS using visual analog scales (VAS).

Methods

Forty-two patients completed VAS scales (0–10) for pain, burning, numbness, tingling, weakness, balance, tightness, aching, pulling, cramping, twitchy/jumpy, uneasy, creepy/crawly, and throbbing, both before and 15 weeks after surgical decompression.

Results

Subjects reported significant improvement among all VAS categories, except for “pulling” (P = 0.14). The change in VAS following surgery was negatively correlated with the pre-surgery VAS for both the summed VAS (r = −0.58, P < 0.001) and the individual VAS scores (all P < 0.01), such that patients who reported the worst symptoms before surgery exhibited relatively greater reductions in symptoms after surgery.

Conclusion

This is the first study to suggest improvement in RLS symptoms following surgical decompression of the common and superficial fibular nerves. Further investigation is needed to quantify improvement using RLS-specific metrics and sleep quality assessments.

Guidelines for the first-line treatment of restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease, prevention and treatment of dopaminergic augmentation: a combined task force of the IRLSSG, EURLSSG, and the RLS-foundation

A Task Force was established by the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) in conjunction with the European Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (EURLSSG) and the RLS Foundation (RLS-F) to develop evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for the prevention and treatment of long-term pharmacologic treatment of dopaminergic-induced augmentation in restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease (RLS/WED). The Task Force made the following prevention and treatment recommendations: As a means to prevent augmentation, medications such as α2δ ligands may be considered for initial RLS/WED treatment; these drugs are effective and have little risk of augmentation. Alternatively, if dopaminergic drugs are elected as initial treatment, then the daily dose should be as low as possible and not exceed that recommended for RLS/WED treatment. However, the physician should be aware that even low dose dopaminergics can cause augmentation. Patients with low iron stores should be given appropriate iron supplementation. Daily treatment by either medication should start only when symptoms have a significant impact on quality of life in terms of frequency and severity; intermittent treatment might be considered in intermediate cases. Treatment of existing augmentation should be initiated, where possible, with the elimination/correction of extrinsic exacerbating factors (iron levels, antidepressants, antihistamines, etc.). In cases of mild augmentation, dopamine agonist therapy can be continued by dividing or advancing the dose, or increasing the dose if there are breakthrough night-time symptoms. Alternatively, the patient can be switched to an α2δ ligand or rotigotine. For severe augmentation the patient can be switched either to an α2δ ligand or rotigotine, noting that rotigotine may also produce augmentation at higher doses with long-term use. In more severe cases of augmentation an opioid may be considered, bypassing α2δ ligands and rotigotine.

Incidence of Augmentation in Primary Restless Legs Syndrome Patients May Not Be That High: Evidence From A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Augmentation is a common complication of primary restless legs syndrome (RLS) during treatment; however, its incidence rate remains unclear.The aim of this study is investigate the rate of augmentation during RLS treatment.We searched 6 databases, including PubMed, OVID, Embase, Wiley citations, Web of Science research platform (including SciELO Citation Index, Medline, KCI Korean Journal Database, the Web of Science™ Core Collection), and the Cochrane library, and screened the reference lists of the included trials and recently published reviews.Randomized controlled trials and observational studies that reported augmentation events during RLS treatment.Primary RLS patients older than 18 years.No restrictions regarding intervention types were applied.Three investigators independently extracted and pooled the data to analyze the augmentation rate of the total sample and of patient subgroups with different interventions, treatment durations and drug regimens and different geographic origins. Fixed-effects or random-effects model was used for pooled analysis.A total of 60 studies involving 11,543 participants suggested an overall augmentation rate of 5.6% (95% confidence intervals (CI), 4.0-7.7). The augmentation incidence was 6.1% (95% CI, 4.1-9.1) for long-term treatment and 3.3% (95% CI, 1.4-7.3) for short-term treatment. In addition, 27.1% (95% CI, 12.3-49.5) of the levodopa-treated patients, 6.0% (95% CI, 4.1-8.8) of the patients treated with dopamine agonists, and 0.9% (95% CI, 0.2-3.3) of the patients taking pregabalin or gabapentin developed augmentation. Augmentation occurred in 7.2% (95% CI, 5.0-10.3) of the patients taking immediate-release drugs and in 1.7% (95% CI, 0.6-5.0) of the patients taking transdermal application.The main limitations are that the augmentation rates were not evaluated according to drug dosage, gender, and age and symptom severity.Approximately 5 to 6 in 100 RLS patients developed augmentation during treatment.

Restless legs syndrome-current therapies and management of augmentation

Idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS) can severely affect quality of life and disturb sleep, so that pharmacological treatment is necessary, especially for elderly patients. Treatment guidelines recommend initiation of therapy with dopamine agonists (pramipexole, ropinirole or the rotigotine transdermal patch, all approved in most countries) or α-2-δ ligands (gabapentin enacarbil, approved in the USA and Japan), depending on the country and availability. Where approved, opioids (prolonged release oxycodone-naloxone, approved in Europe) are also recommended as a second-line therapy for severe RLS. Several iron formulations can be effective but are not yet approved for RLS therapy, whereas benzodiazepines and other anticonvulsants are not recommended or approved. Less is known about effective management of RLS that is associated with other conditions, such as uraemia or pregnancy. Furthermore, very little data are available on the management of RLS when first-line treatment fails or patients experience augmentation. In this Review, we summarize state-of-the-art therapies for RLS in the context of the diagnostic criteria and available guidelines, based on knowledge ranging from Class I evidence for the treatment of idiopathic RLS to Class IV evidence for the treatment of complications such as augmentation. We consider therapies, including combination therapies, that are used in clinical practice for long-term management of RLS, despite a lack of trials and approval, and highlight the need for practical long-term evaluation of current trials.

Dopaminergic Augmentation in Restless Legs Syndrome/Willis-Ekbom Disease: Identification and Management

Augmentation is the main clinical complication of long-term dopaminergic treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS)/Willis-Ekbom disease and also the main reason for treatment failure of this class of drugs. It involves an increase in the severity (or frequency) of RLS symptoms during treatment. There is some preliminary evidence that the incidence of augmentation is higher when short-acting dopamine agonists are used. Prevention strategies include managing lifestyle changes and keeping dopaminergic load low. This might include, whenever feasible, to postpone any dopaminergic medication and perform a treatment trial with nondopaminergic agents (ie, alpha-2 delta ligand) first. Treatment of augmentation might require switching to longer-acting dopaminergic agents, to alpha-2 delta ligands or to opiates.

Augmentation of restless leg syndrome (Willis-Ekbom disease) during long-term dopaminergic treatment

Restless legs syndrome (RLS), also known as Willis-Ekbom disease (WED), is a common sensorimotor disorder that can generally be effectively managed in the primary care clinic. However, some treatment complications may arise. According to the recommendations of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group, non-ergot dopamine-receptor agonists have over the past years been one of the first-line treatments for patients with RLS/WED requiring pharmacological therapy. Augmentation is the main complication of long-term dopaminergic treatment of RLS/WED and is defined as an overall worsening of symptoms beyond pretreatment levels in patients who experienced an initial positive therapeutic response. Once identified on the basis of its characteristic clinical features, augmentation requires careful management. In order to provide clinicians with a comprehensive understanding of this common treatment complication, this review discusses the clinical features of augmentation, and its differentiation from morning rebound, symptom fluctuations and natural disease progression. Reported incidences of augmentation in clinical trials of dopaminergic RLS/WED therapies are summarized. Finally, the hypothetical pathophysiology of augmentation and the current recommendations for management of patients with augmented RLS/WED symptoms are discussed.

Augmentation in Restless Legs Syndrome: Treatment with Gradual Medication Modification

Dopaminergic drugs can cause augmentation during the treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS). We previously reported that sudden withdrawal of dopaminergic treatment was poorly tolerated. We now report our experience with gradual withdrawal of the dopaminergic drug during the drug substitution process using a retrospective chart review with comparison to previous data. Seven patients with RLS and dopaminergic drug-induced augmentation were treated with a gradual withdrawal of the offending drug and replacement with an alternative medication. Compared to sudden withdrawal, measured outcomes were similar but gradual tapering was better tolerated. We conclude that for augmentation in RLS, gradual tapering of the augmentation-inducing dopaminergic drug is better tolerated than sudden withdrawal. The optimal approach to treating augmentation has not been established and may differ between patients. Further study with direct comparison of strategies and a larger patient population is needed to confirm our preliminary observations.

Restless legs syndrome: clinical presentation diagnosis and treatment

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a circadian disorder of sensory-motor integration that may be related to genetically determined dysregulation of iron transport across the blood-brain barrier. Dopamine agonists (DAs) have been considered the first-line therapy, but with the growing appreciation of problems associated with long-term treatment, particularly augmentation and impulse control disorder, alpha-2-delta drugs, such as gabapentin, are now considered the first line of treatment in patients with troublesome RLS. Opioids can be considered as an alternative therapy, particularly in patients with DA-related augmentation. In more severe cases, a combination therapy may be required. Intravenous iron therapy may be considered on those patients with refractory RLS.

An update on restless legs syndrome (Willis-Ekbom disease): clinical features, pathogenesis and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, there have been a number of advances in the field of restless legs syndrome (RLS) or Willis-Ekbom disease (WED). Here, we review recent studies pertaining to the diagnosis and clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment of RLS/WED.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have added a temporal dimension to RLS/WED epidemiology by examining both the incidence and persistence rates in different populations. Diagnostic criteria have been modified to increase sensitivity, and new guidelines take into account recently published studies of different drug classes.

SUMMARY

Recent epidemiological findings have shown that RLS/WED is a common neurological disorder that affects up to 5% of the adult population in Western countries. In moderate and severe cases, RLS/WED has a strong impact on sleep and quality of life and can involve an increased cardiovascular risk. Diagnosis is made clinically by confirming the presence of the five essential criteria. However, in difficult cases objective tests such as the multiple suggested immobilization test (m-SIT) can be used. The pathophysiology is partially known, with several risk polymorphisms (BTBD-9 (BTB (POZ) domain containing 9), MEIS-1 (Meis homeobox 1), protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, D, and others) playing an important role, along with dopaminergic and iron dysfunctions. The disorder frequently requires long-term treatment with low-dose dopamine agonists or α2δ ligands. Dopamine agonists are usually effective but the main complication, RLS/WED augmentation, can arise.

A mixed treatment comparison of gabapentin enacarbil, pramipexole, ropinirole and rotigotine in moderate-to-severe restless legs syndrome

OBJECTIVE

A mixed treatment comparison (MTC) was performed to investigate the relative efficacy and safety of licensed pharmaceuticals for moderate-to-severe restless legs syndrome (RLS).

METHODS

RLS trials published over the past 10 years were identified via systematic literature searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and manufacturers' websites. MTC was performed with WinBUGS software using a Bayesian approach. Identified primary outcomes: change in International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) at week 12 and end of maintenance (EoM).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

IRLS and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) responders, RLS-6 items and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight clinical trials were identified. Fifteen were included in the primary analysis. Indirect comparisons were established among gabapentin enacarbil, pramipexole, ropinirole, rotigotine and placebo. Overall, the four active treatments showed similar efficacies as assessed by changes in IRLS scores, IRLS responders, CGI-I responders, and RLS-6 scores. The sole exception was change in IRLS at week 12, for which rotigotine was likely more efficacious than ropinirole (mean difference: -2.52 [95% CrI: -4.74, -0.40]). Indirect comparisons on safety endpoints indicated ropinirole was associated with a higher risk of nausea than the other agents, and was more likely to result in discontinuations due to lack of efficacy than pramipexole. Nausea was likely more frequent with pramipexole than gabapentin enacarbil, and rotigotine was more likely to result in discontinuation due to AEs than ropinirole and pramipexole.

CONCLUSIONS

This MTC confirmed the superiority of gabapentin enacarbil, pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine above placebo in alleviating RLS symptoms. Compared to ropinirole, rotigotine showed some additional benefit in terms of change in IRLS at Week 12. Choice of RLS drugs requires careful evaluation of effectiveness and safety profiles in clinical practice. Due to lack of head-to-head trials, inconsistency could not be assessed in our analysis. Head-to-head trials on a more homogeneous population are needed to validate the MTC results.

Diagnosis, comorbidities, and management of restless legs syndrome

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review describes the differential diagnosis of restless legs syndrome, and provides an overview of the evidence for the associations between RLS and potential comorbidities. Secondary causes of RLS and the characteristics of pediatric RLS are also discussed. Finally, management strategies for RLS are summarized.

METHODS

The review began with a comprehensive PubMed search for 'restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease' in combination with the following: anxiety, arthritis, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, cardiac, cardiovascular disease, comorbidities, depression, end-stage renal disease, erectile dysfunction, fibromyalgia, insomnia, kidney disease, liver disease, migraine, mood disorder, multiple sclerosis, narcolepsy, neuropathy, obesity, pain, Parkinson's disease, polyneuropathy, pregnancy, psychiatric disorder, sleep disorder, somatoform pain disorder, and uremia. Additional papers were identified by reviewing the reference lists of retrieved publications.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Although clinical diagnosis of RLS can be straightforward, diagnostic challenges may arise when patients present with comorbid conditions. Comorbidities of RLS include insomnia, depressive and anxiety disorders, and pain disorders. Differential diagnosis is particularly important, as some of the medications used to treat insomnia and depression may exacerbate RLS symptoms. Appropriate diagnosis and management of RLS symptoms may benefit patient well-being and, in some cases, may lessen comorbid disease burden. Therefore, it is important that physicians are aware of the presence of RLS when treating patients with conditions that commonly co-occur with the disorder.

Augmentation in restless legs syndrome patients in Korea

PURPOSE

Augmentation has been known as the major complication of long-term dopaminergic treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS). However, there have been no reports on the prevalence of augmentation in Korea. Thus, we aimed to assess the rate of augmentation and evaluate related factors in Korean RLS patients.

METHODS

Ninety-four idiopathic RLS patients who have been treated over a period of at least 6 months were enrolled. Thirty subjects were treated with a dopamine agonist only, and 64 were treated with a dopamine agonist and alpha two delta ligands. We assessed the clinical characteristics of those RLS subjects and evaluated the rate of augmentation. Augmentation was assessed using the NIH criteria for augmentation by two RLS experts independently.

RESULTS

Eleven subjects (11.7%) were classified as having definitive or highly suggestive clinical indication of augmentation. In comparing the augmentation group with the non-augmentation group, there were no significant differences of baseline clinical characteristics. Four (13.3%) of the dopamine agonists monotherapy group and seven (10.9%) of the combination therapy group were categorized as augmentation. There was no significant difference in the augmentation rate between these two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found an 11.7% augmentation rate in Korean RLS subjects. There was no difference in the rate of RLS augmentation between the dopaminergic monotherapy group and the combined treatment group. It may be related with using a similar dosage of dopaminergic drugs.

Restless legs syndrome/Willis Ekbom disease: evaluation and treatment

Restless legs syndrome/Willis Ekbom disease (RLS/WED) has been recognized as a significant medical disorder since the 17th century. It was studied mostly in the last 50 years in relation to increasing interest in sleep medicine and health-related quality of life. This led to recognition that the disease is not well characterized as restless feelings in the legs. These symptoms are reported in many situations, but the subjective experience of RLS/WED patients differs from that experienced by others. Thus a new name has been introduced that avoids problems of symptom definition of a disease by naming it after those who first characterized it, i.e. 'Willis Ekbom disease'. This article emphasizes the importance of RLS/WED for psychiatry. The disease carries significant increased risk for depression and anxiety disorders. Treatment requires consideration of these co-morbid disorders. RLS/WED can exacerbate or even engender psychiatric disease, so treatment of psychiatric disease should also include consideration of RLS/WED. The need for attention to RLS/WED is particularly significant for depression. Most anti-depressants exacerbate or can even engender RLS/WED. Thus this article seeks to introduce RLS/WED in relation to psychiatric practice. It presents the RLS/WED disease, its overlap with psychiatry and the current treatment options.

The long-term treatment of restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease: evidence-based guidelines and clinical consensus best practice guidance: a report from the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group

A Task Force was established by the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) to develop evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for the long-term pharmacologic treatment of restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease (RLS/WED). The Task Force reviewed the results of all studies of RLS/WED treatments with durations of 6 months or longer presented at meetings over the past 2 years, posted on Web sites of pharmaceutical companies, or published in peer-reviewed journals, asking the questions, "What is the efficacy of this treatment in patients with RLS/WED?" and "What is the safety of this treatment in patients with RLS/WED?" The Task Force developed guidelines based on their review of 61 papers meeting inclusion criteria, and using a modified evidence-grading scheme. Pregabalin has been established as effective for up to 1 year in treating RLS/WED (Level A evidence). Pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine have been established as effective for up to 6 months in treating RLS/WED (Level A). The following drugs have been established as probably effective (Level B) in treating RLS/WED for durations ranging from 1 to 5 years: gabapentin enacarbil, pramipexole, and ropinirole (1 year); levodopa (2 years); and rotigotine (5 years). Because of associated safety concerns, pergolide and cabergoline should not be used in the treatment of RLS/WED unless the benefits clearly outweigh the risks. Other pharmacologic therapies have insufficient evidence to support their long-term use in treating RLS/WED. The IRLSSG Task Force also developed consensus-based strategies for the prevention and treatment of complications (such as augmentation, loss of efficacy, excessive daytime sleepiness, and impulse control disorders) that may develop with the long-term pharmacologic treatment of RLS/WED. The use of either a dopamine-receptor agonist or α2δ calcium-channel ligand is recommended as the first-line treatment of RLS/WED for most patients, with the choice of agent dependent on the patient's severity of RLS/WED symptoms, cognitive status, history, and comorbid conditions.

Comparison of pregabalin with pramipexole for restless legs syndrome

BACKGROUND

Dopaminergic medications relieve symptoms of the restless legs syndrome (RLS) but have the potential to cause iatrogenic worsening (augmentation) of RLS with long-term treatment. Pregabalin may be an effective alternative.

METHODS

In this 52-week, randomized, double-blind trial, we assessed efficacy and augmentation in patients with RLS who were treated with pregabalin as compared with placebo and pramipexole. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 52 weeks of treatment with pregabalin at a dose of 300 mg per day or pramipexole at a dose of 0.25 mg or 0.5 mg per day or 12 weeks of placebo followed by 40 weeks of randomly assigned active treatment. The primary analyses involved a comparison of pregabalin and placebo over a period of 12 weeks with use of the International RLS (IRLS) Study Group Rating Scale (on which the score ranges from 0 to 40, with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms), the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale (which was used to assess the proportion of patients with symptoms that were "very much improved" or "much improved"), and a comparison of rates of augmentation with pregabalin and pramipexole over a period of 40 or 52 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 719 participants received daily treatment, 182 with 300 mg of pregabalin, 178 with 0.25 mg of pramipexole, 180 with 0.5 mg of pramipexole, and 179 with placebo. Over a period of 12 weeks, the improvement (reduction) in mean scores on the IRLS scale was greater, by 4.5 points, among participants receiving pregabalin than among those receiving placebo (P<0.001), and the proportion of patients with symptoms that were very much improved or much improved was also greater with pregabalin than with placebo (71.4% vs. 46.8%, P<0.001). The rate of augmentation over a period of 40 or 52 weeks was significantly lower with pregabalin than with pramipexole at a dose of 0.5 mg (2.1% vs. 7.7%, P=0.001) but not at a dose of 0.25 mg (2.1% vs. 5.3%, P=0.08). There were six cases of suicidal ideation in the group receiving pregabalin, three in the group receiving 0.25 mg of pramipexole, and two in the group receiving 0.5 mg of pramipexole.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregabalin provided significantly improved treatment outcomes as compared with placebo, and augmentation rates were significantly lower with pregabalin than with 0.5 mg of pramipexole. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00806026.).

[Practical guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of restless legs syndrome]

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is the most common neurological sleep disorder affecting 10 % of the Caucasian population. The disorder is characterized by painful sensations in the lower limbs, especially during the evening, at night and during rest, resulting in an urge to move the legs and insomnia. As a result the quality of life is significantly reduced. Dopaminergic agents, opioids and anticonvulsants have proven to be effective for RLS with only the former being currently licensed; however, affected patients have to be identified, which is not always the case, especially in outpatient settings. Possible impediments to the adequate management of patients with RLS may include a lack of awareness, comorbidities and other medical conditions mimicking RLS. To overcome some of these difficulties practical guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of RLS are provided.

Treatment of restless legs syndrome

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common disorder diagnosed by the clinical characteristics of restlessness in the legs associated often with abnormal sensations that start at rest and are improved by activity, occurring with a diurnal pattern of worsened symptoms at night and improvement in the morning. RLS is the cause of impaired quality of life in those more severely afflicted. Treatment of RLS has undergone considerable change over the last few years. Several classes of medications have demonstrated efficacy, including the dopaminergic agents and the alpha-2-delta ligands. Levodopa was the first dopaminergic agent found to be successful. However, chronic use of levodopa is frequently associated with augmentation that is defined as an earlier occurrence of symptoms frequently associated with worsening severity and sometimes spread to other body areas. The direct dopamine agonists, including ropinirole, pramipexole, and rotigotine patch, are also effective, although side effects, including daytime sleepiness, impulse control disorders, and augmentation, may limit usefulness. The alpha-2-delta ligands, including gabapentin, gabapentin enacarbil, and pregabalin, are effective for RLS without known occurrence of augmentation or impulse control disorders, although sedation and dizziness can occur. Other agents, including the opioids and clonazepam do not have sufficient evidence to recommend them as treatment for RLS, although in an individual patient, they may provide benefit.

Ropinirole in patients with restless legs syndrome and baseline IRLS total scores ≥ 24: efficacy and tolerability in a 26-week, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study followed by a 40-week open-label extension

BACKGROUND

As with studies of other dopamine agonists, previously reported studies of ropinirole in restless legs syndrome (RLS) recruited patients with baseline International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) total scores ≥ 15. The reported pooled analyses of clinical trials data suggest benefits of ropinirole in patients with IRLS total scores ≥ 24, but the effects of ropinirole have not been prospectively evaluated in this patient population.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ropinirole in patients with RLS and baseline IRLS total scores ≥ 24. This study was conducted in part to fulfill a postlicensing commitment between the maker of ropinirole and the European Union's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use.

METHODS

The protocol for this study comprised a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 26-week phase during which adults with baseline IRLS total scores ≥ 24 received a ropinirole dose from 0.25 to 4 mg (n = 197) or placebo (n = 207) followed by a 40-week, open-label phase during which all patients (n = 269) received ropinirole. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in the IRLS total score at week 12. Tolerability measures included the incidence of adverse events, augmentation, and early morning rebound. Due to the possibility of a treatment-by-center group interaction (P = 0.04) in the IRLS analysis, further efficacy exploratory analyses were performed to assess the impact of the interaction on the overall assessment of efficacy.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics were comparable between groups (mean [SD] age: placebo, 56.1 [11.38] years; ropinirole, 56.5 [11.92] years; 63% female in both groups). All of the patients in the ropinirole group were white; 99% of the placebo group was white. Ropinirole was significantly better than placebo for change from baseline in the IRLS total score during both short- and long-term treatment, with mean treatment differences of -2.1 (P = 0.039) and -2.5 (P = 0.023) for weeks 12 and 26, respectively. A statistically significant treatment by center group interaction was observed (P = 0.040) for the change from baseline in IRLS total score, indicating variation of treatment effects among center groups; however, all center groups showed an improvement from baseline at both week 12 and week 26 for the ropinirole immediate-release group and the placebo group. The incidences of augmentation and early morning rebound were ≤ 4% for ropinirole. The adverse event profile of ropinirole was consistent with that reported in previous clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

In this subset of patients with RLS and a baseline IRLS total score ≥ 24, ropinirole was effective and well tolerated compared with placebo. The incidence of augmentation and early morning rebound in this study was low.

Gabapentin enacarbil in Japanese patients with restless legs syndrome: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study

OBJECTIVE

Gabapentin enacarbil (GEn) was effective and well-tolerated for the treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS) in North American studies. However, no placebo-controlled studies of GEn have been performed in Asian patients with RLS. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy and safety of GEn in Japanese patients with RLS to determine the optimal dosage.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Outpatients with RLS (International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) scores ≥15) were randomized (n = 474) and treated (n = 469) in a double-blind manner with once-daily placebo (n = 116), 600 (n = 120), 900 (n = 119) or 1200 (n = 114) mg GEn for 12 weeks.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00530530 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome was the change in IRLS score. Secondary outcomes included Investigator (ICGI)- and Patient (PCGI)-rated Clinical Global Impression and adverse events.

RESULTS

The mean change in IRLS score from baseline to the final observation was -8.96 for placebo versus -11.10, -10.28 and -11.38 for 600, 900 and 1200 mg GEn. Williams' multiple comparison test showed that only 1200 mg GEn was superior to placebo (p = 0.011). However, in post hoc mixed-effects models with repeated measures, which accounted for the time-course of changes in IRLS, the placebo-adjusted changes were -2.31, -1.92 and -2.31 for 600, 900 and 1200 mg GEn. ICGI and PCGI response rates were significantly greater for all three GEn doses versus placebo (all p ≤ 0.014). Adverse events, including somnolence, dizziness and nasopharyngitis, were frequent but of mild-to-moderate severity. However, there was a tendency toward a dose-dependent increase in the incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

GEn is effective and well-tolerated for the treatment of RLS in Japanese patients. All three doses produced improvements in IRLS compared with placebo; 600 mg GEn is a suitable target dose. However, our analysis possibly introduced positive bias by assuming that symptoms improve after discontinuation.

ADMET considerations for restless leg syndrome drug treatments

INTRODUCTION

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common neurological disorder that might impair nocturnal rest causing decreased alertness, depressed mood, reduced job performance, and poor quality of life. In patients affected by severe RLS, a pharmacological treatment is mandatory.

AREAS COVERED

The present review is based on a search using PubMed from 1994 to 2012. It is focused on the Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Elimination and Toxicology (ADMET) characteristics of the most used medications for RLS. In particular, the ADMET characteristics of dopaminergic agents, anticonvulsants able to improve neuropathic pain, and iron were discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical trials have showed that non-ergolic dopamine agonists are efficacious and safe for patients affected by moderate to severe idiopathic RLS. However, no head-to-head study has compared the long-term effects of the three dopamine agonists approved by the FDA for RLS (ropinirole, pramipexole, and rotigotine). Moreover, further studies should investigate the extended-release formulation of ropinirole and pramipexole in RLS patients affected by all day long distressing symptoms. A standardized treatment for symptomatic forms of RLS is lacking. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials should be performed at least in RLS patients with peripheral neuropathic and chronic kidney disease. Concerning RLS due to iron deficiency, a head-to-head study comparing efficacy, safety and compliance of oral iron versus intravenous one seems to be needed.