Stimulation site within the MRI-defined STN predicts postoperative motor outcome

A Meta-Analysis of Medication Reduction and Motor Outcomes After Awake Versus Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There remains significant debate regarding the performance of deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedures for Parkinson disease (PD) under local or general anesthesia. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes between "asleep" DBS (general anesthesia) and "awake" DBS (local anesthesia) for PD.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature review of all published studies on DBS for PD following PRISMA guideline on PubMed and Cochrane library from January 2004 to April 2023. Inclusion criteria included cohort ≥15 patients, clinical outcomes data which included Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score and levodopa equivalent daily dosage (LEDD), and ≥3 months of follow-up. Analysis was conducted using Stata software.

RESULTS

There were 18 articles that met inclusion criteria. On meta-analysis, there were no significant differences between awake or asleep DBS with regard to percent change in UPDRS III "off" med/"on" DBS condition ( P = .6) and LEDD score ( P = .99). On subgroup analysis, we found that the choice of target had no significant effect on improvement of UPDRS III ( P = 1.0) or LEDD ( P = .99) change for the asleep vs awake operative approach. There were also no statistically significant differences between microelectrode recording (MER) use and no MER use in postoperative UPDRS III ( P = 1.0) or LEDD improvement ( P = .90) between awake and asleep surgery.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in the primary motor outcomes and LEDD improvement between asleep vs awake DBS. The variables of target selection and MER use had no statistically significant impact on outcome. We find that asleep techniques are both safe and effective compared with the awake technique.

Asleep versus awake GPi DBS surgery for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) who receive either asleep image-guided subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (DBS) or the traditional awake technique have comparable motor outcomes. However, there are fewer studies regarding which technique should be chosen for globus pallidus internus (GPi) DBS. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the accuracy of lead placement and motor outcomes of asleep versus awake GPi DBS PD population.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies comparing asleep vs. awake GPi DBS lead placement in patients with PD. Outcomes were spatial accuracy of lead placement, measured by radial error between intended and actual location, motor improvement measured using (UPDRS III), and postoperative stimulation parameters. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.1.7. and OpenMeta [Analyst].

RESULTS

Three studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 247 patients. Asleep DBS was used to treat 192 (77.7 %) patients. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 48 months. Radial error was not statistically different between groups (MD -0.49 mm; 95 % CI -1.0 to 0.02; I2 = 86 %; p = 0.06), with a tendency for higher target accuracy with the asleep technique. There was no significant difference between groups in change on motor function, as measured by UPDRS III, from pre- to postoperative (MD 8.30 %; 95 % CI -4.78 to 21.37; I2 = 67 %, p = 0.2). There was a significant difference in postoperative stimulation voltage, with the asleep group requiring less voltage than the awake group (MD -0.27 V; 95 % CI -0.46 to - 0.08; I2 = 0 %; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis indicates that asleep image-guided GPi DBS presents a statistical tendency suggesting superior target accuracy when compared with the awake standard technique. Differences in change in motor function were not statistically significant between groups.

A Systematic Review of Neurophysiology-Based Localization Techniques Used in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery of the Subthalamic Nucleus

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review is conducted to identify, compare, and analyze neurophysiological feature selection, extraction, and classification to provide a comprehensive reference on neurophysiology-based subthalamic nucleus (STN) localization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The review was carried out using the methods and guidelines of the Kitchenham systematic review and provides an in-depth analysis on methods proposed on STN localization discussed in the literature between 2000 and 2021. Three research questions were formulated, and 115 publications were identified to answer the questions.

RESULTS

The three research questions formulated are answered using the literature found on the respective topics. This review discussed the technologies used in past research, and the performance of the state-of-the-art techniques is also reviewed.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review provides a comprehensive reference on neurophysiology-based STN localization by reviewing the research questions other new researchers may also have.

Prospective analysis of gross and fine electrode position and motor manifestations after STN-DBS and their correlation with electrode position

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been proven to be a safe, reversible, cost-effective procedure for treatment of Parkinson's disease. Final electrode position remains a significant factor determining the outcomes of subthalamic nucleus DBS (STN-DBS). This study aims to analyze the final lead position in three-dimensional plane and its effect on gross and fine motor outcomes in cases of advanced Parkinson's disease operated for STN-DBS.

METHODS

Patients who underwent bilateral STN-DBS were prospectively followed for improvement in gross motor outcomes at 6 months. Improvement in dysgraphia was analyzed by Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale Part B Score. Postoperative outcomes were correlated with final electrode position.

RESULTS

A total of 64 Patients (128 leads) were analyzed. Patients who were less than 65 years of age at time of surgery had more significant reduction in UPDRS III (P=0.02). Cases with deviation of left x less than 3 mm had significant reduction in UPDRS III (P=0.05) and speech sub-scores (P=0.05). Deviation less than 2 mm in left x was associated with reduction in gait sub-scores (P=0.04). Optimal placement of right y electrode was associated with reduction in UPDRS III (P=0.02). Significant reduction in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale Part B Score was noted after DBS (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Subthalamic nucleus DBS thus results in significantly improved functional outcome particularly in patients with age less than 65 years. Accurate final electrode position is associated with maximum clinical benefit and improvement in dysgraphia.

A Retrospective Comparison of Multiple Approaches to Anatomically Informed Contact Selection in Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

Background

Conventional deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming via trial-and-error warrants improvement to ensure swift achievement of optimal outcomes. The definition of a sweet spot for subthalamic DBS in Parkinson's disease (PD-STN-DBS) may offer such advancement.

Objective

This investigation examines the association of long-term motor outcomes with contact selection during monopolar review and different strategies for anatomically informed contact selection in a retrospective real-life cohort of PD-STN-DBS.

Methods

We compared contact selection based on a monopolar review (MPR) to multiple anatomically informed contact selection strategies in a cohort of 28 PD patients with STN-DBS. We employed a commercial software package for contact selection based on visual assessment of individual anatomy following two predefined strategies and two algorithmic approaches with automatic targeting of either the sensorimotor STN or our previously published sweet spot. Similarity indices between chronic stimulation and contact selection strategies were correlated to motor outcomes at 12 months follow-up.

Results

Lateralized motor outcomes of chronic DBS were correlated to the similarity between chronic stimulation and visual contact selection targeting the dorsal part of the posterior STN (rho = 0.36, p = 0.007). Similar relationships could not be established for MPR or any of the other investigated strategies.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrates that a visual contact selection following a predefined strategy can be linked to beneficial long-term motor outcomes in PD-STN-DBS. Since similar correlations could not be observed for the other approaches to anatomically informed contact selection, we conclude that clear definitions and prospective validation of any approach to imaging-based DBS-programming is warranted.

Anatomical substrates and connectivity for bradykinesia motor features in Parkinson's disease after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation

Parkinsonian bradykinesia is rated using a composite scale incorporating the slowed frequency of repetitive movements, decrement amplitude and arrhythmicity. Differential localization of these movement components within the basal ganglia will drive the development of more personalized network-targeted symptomatic therapies. In this study, using an optical motion sensor, we evaluated the amplitude and frequency of hand movements during a grasping task with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation 'on' or 'off' in 15 patients with Parkinson's disease. The severity of bradykinesia was assessed blindly using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Part III scale. The volumes of activated tissue of each subject were estimated where changes in amplitude and frequency were mapped to identify distinct anatomical substrates of each component in the subthalamic nucleus. The volumes of activated tissue were used to seed a normative functional connectome to generate connectivity maps associated with amplitude and frequency changes. Deep brain stimulation-induced change in amplitude was negatively correlated with a change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Part III scale for right (r = -0.65, P < 0.05) and left hand grasping scores (r = -0.63, P < 0.05). The change in frequency was negatively correlated with amplitude for both right (r = -0.63, P < 0.05) and left hands (r = -0.57, P < 0.05). The amplitude and frequency changes were represented as a spatial gradient with overlapping and non-overlapping regions spanning the anteromedial-posterolateral axis of the subthalamic nucleus. Whole-brain correlation maps between functional connectivity and motor changes were also inverted between amplitude and frequency changes. Deep brain stimulation-associated changes in frequency and amplitude were topographically and distinctly represented both locally in the subthalamic nucleus and in whole-brain functional connectivity.

Combining ultrasound and microelectrode recordings for postoperative localization of subthalamic electrodes in Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE

To assess transcranial sonography (TCS) as stand-alone tool and in combination with microelectrode recordings (MER) as a method for the postoperative localization of deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus (STN).

METHODS

Individual dorsal and ventral boundaries of STN (n = 12) were determined on intraoperative MER. Postoperatively, a standardized TCS protocol was applied to measure medio-lateral, anterior-posterior and rostro-caudal electrode position using visualized reference structures (midline, substantia nigra). TCS and combined TCS-MER data were validated using fusion-imaging and clinical outcome data.

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability of standard TCS measures of electrode position was excellent. Computed tomography and TCS measures of distance between distal electrode contact and midline agreed well (Pearson correlation; r = 0.86; p < 0.001). Comparing our "gold standard" of rostro-caudal electrode localization relative to STN boundaries, i.e. combining MRI-based stereotaxy and MER data, with the combination of TCS and MER data, the measures differed by 0.32 ± 0.87 (range, -1.35 to 1.25) mm. Combined TCS-MER data identified the clinically preferred electrode contacts for STN-DBS with high accuracy (Coheńs kappa, 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined TCS-MER data allow for exact localization of STN-DBS electrodes.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our method provides a new option for monitoring of STN-DBS electrode location and guidance of DBS programming in Parkinson's disease.

PAllidal versus SubThalamic deep brain Stimulation for Cervical Dystonia (PASTS-CD): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been validated as a safe and effective treatment for refractory cervical dystonia (CD). Globus pallidus internus (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) are the two main stimulating targets. However, there has been no prospective study to clarify which target is the better DBS candidate for CD. The objective of this trial is to compare directly the efficacy and safety of GPi-DBS and STN-DBS, thereby instructing the selection of DBS target in clinical practice.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled study plans to enrol 98 refractory CD patients. Eligible CD patients will be randomly allocated to GPi-DBS group or STN-DBS group, with the DBS electrodes implanted into the posteroventral portion of GPi or the dorsolateral portion of STN, respectively. The primary outcome will be the improvement of symptomatic severity, measured by the changes in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale and the Tsui scale at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery. The secondary outcomes include the improvement of the TWSTRS-disability subscale, TWSTRS-pain subscale, quality of life, mental and cognitive condition, as well as the differences in stimulation parameters and adverse effects. In addition, this study intends to identify certain predictors of DBS efficacy for CD.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital (S2022-613-01). The results of this study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and shared in professional medical conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05715138.

Effect of Enlarged Perivascular Spaces in Reliable Distinction of Prospective Targeting During Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Study of Deterministic and Probabilistic Tractography

BACKGROUND

Precise electrode position is vital for effective deep brain stimulation in treating motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). Enlarged perivascular spaces (PVSs) are associated with pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases including PD and may affect the microstructure of surrounding brain tissue.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the clinical implications of enlarged PVS on tractography-based stereotactic targeting in patients with advanced PD selected to undergo deep brain stimulation.

METHODS

Twenty patients with PD underwent MRI scanning. The PVS areas were visualized and segmented. Based on the size of the PVS areas, the patient group was split into 2 categories of large vs small PVSs. Probabilistic and deterministic tractography methods were applied to a diffusion-weighted data set. Fiber assignment was performed using motor cortex as an initiation seed and the globus pallidus interna and subthalamic nucleus, separately, as inclusion masks. Two exclusion masks used consisted of cerebral peduncles and the PVS mask. The center of gravity of the tract density map was measured and compared between the tracts generated with and without consideration of the PVS mask.

RESULTS

The average differences between the center of gravity of the tracts made by excluding PVS and without excluding PVS using deterministic and probabilistic tractography methods were less than 1 mm. Statistical analysis showed nonsignificant differences between deterministic and probabilistic methods and differences between patients with large and small PVSs ( P > .05).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the presence of enlarged PVS is unlikely to affect targeting of basal ganglia nuclei based on tractography.

Anatomical targeting for electrode localization in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: A comparative study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In deep brain stimulation (DBS), accurate electrode placement is essential for optimizing patient outcomes. Localizing electrodes enables insight into therapeutic outcomes and development of metrics for use in clinical trials. Methods of defining anatomical targets have been described with varying accuracy and objectivity. To assess variability in anatomical targeting, we compare four methods of defining an appropriate target for DBS of the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson's disease.

METHODS

The methods compared are direct visualization, red nucleus-based indirect targeting, mid-commissural point-based indirect targeting, and automated template-based targeting. This study assessed 226 hemispheres in 113 DBS recipients (39 females, 73 males, 62.2 ± 7.7 years). We utilized the electrode placement error (the Euclidean distance between the defined target and closest DBS electrode) as a metric for comparative analysis. Pairwise differences in electrode placement error across the four methods were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis H-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

RESULTS

Interquartile ranges of the differences in electrode placement error spanned 1.18-1.56 mm. A Kruskal-Wallis H-test reported a statistically significant difference in the median of at least two groups (H(5) = 41.052, p < .001). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests reported statistically significant difference in two comparisons: direct visualization versus red nucleus-based indirect, and direct visualization versus automated template-based methods (T < 9215, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

All methods were similarly discordant in their relative accuracy, despite having significant technical differences in their application. The differing protocols and technical aspects of each method, however, have the implication that one may be more practical depending on the clinical or research application at hand.

Connectivity Profile for Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Early Stage Parkinson Disease

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to describe relationships between electrode localization and motor outcomes from the subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in early stage Parkinson disease (PD) pilot clinical trial.

METHODS

To determine anatomical and network correlates associated with motor outcomes for subjects randomized to early DBS (n = 14), voxelwise sweet spot mapping and structural connectivity analyses were carried out using outcomes of motor progression (Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Part III [UPDRS-III] 7-day OFF scores [∆baseline➔24 months, MedOFF/StimOFF]) and symptomatic motor improvement (UPDRS-III ON scores [%∆baseline➔24 months, MedON/StimON]).

RESULTS

Sweet spot mapping revealed a location associated with slower motor progression in the dorsolateral STN (anterior/posterior commissure coordinates: 11.07 ± 0.82mm lateral, 1.83 ± 0.61mm posterior, 3.53 ± 0.38mm inferior to the midcommissural point; Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates: +11.25, -13.56, -7.44mm). Modulating fiber tracts from supplementary motor area (SMA) and primary motor cortex (M1) to the STN correlated with slower motor progression across STN DBS subjects, whereas fiber tracts originating from pre-SMA and cerebellum were negatively associated with motor progression. Robustness of the fiber tract model was demonstrated in leave-one-patient-out (R = 0.56, p = 0.02), 5-fold (R = 0.50, p = 0.03), and 10-fold (R = 0.53, p = 0.03) cross-validation paradigms. The sweet spot and fiber tracts associated with motor progression revealed strong similarities to symptomatic motor improvement sweet spot and connectivity in this early stage PD cohort.

INTERPRETATION

These results suggest that stimulating the dorsolateral region of the STN receiving input from M1 and SMA (but not pre-SMA) is associated with slower motor progression across subjects receiving STN DBS in early stage PD. This finding is hypothesis-generating and must be prospectively tested in a larger study. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:271-284.

Evaluation of the PaCER Algorithm for Postoperative Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Localization. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2023;2023:1-4. [PMID: 38083396 DOI: 10.1109/embc40787.2023.10340555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for many movement disorders. DBS entails electrical stimulation of precise brain structures using permanently implanted electrodes. Following implantation, locating the electrodes relative to the target brain structure assists patient outcome optimization. Here we evaluated an open-source automatic algorithm (PaCER) to localize individual electrodes on Computed Tomography imaging (co-registered to Magnetic Resonance Imaging). In a dataset of 111 participants, we found a modified version of the algorithm matched manual-markups with median error less than 0.191 mm (interquartile range 0.698 mm). Given the error is less than the voxel resolution (1 mm3) of the images, we conclude that the automatic algorithm is suitable for DBS electrode localizations.Clinical Relevance- Automated DBS electrode localization identifies the closest electrode to the target brain structure; allowing the neurologist to direct electrical stimulation to maximize patient outcomes. Further, if none of the electrodes are deemed suitable, localization will guide re-implantation.

Anatomical Substrates and Connectivity for Parkinson's Disease Bradykinesia Components after STN-DBS

Background

Parkinsonian bradykinesia is rated using a composite scale incorporating slowed frequency of repetitive movements, decrement amplitude, and arrhythmicity. Differential localization of these movement components within basal ganglia would drive the development of more personalized network-targeted symptomatic therapies.

Methods

Using an optical motion sensor, amplitude and frequency of hand movements during grasping task were evaluated with subthalamic nucleus (STN)-Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) "on" or "off" in 15 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The severity of bradykinesia was assessed blindly using the MDS-UPDRS Part-III scale. Volumes of activated tissue (VAT) of each subject were estimated where changes in amplitude and frequency were mapped to identify distinct anatomical substrates of each component in the STN. VATs were used to seed a normative functional connectome to generate connectivity maps associated with amplitude and frequency changes.

Results

STN-DBS-induced change in amplitude was negatively correlated with change in MDS-UPDRS-III right (r = -0.65, p < 0.05) and left hand grasping scores (r = -0.63, p < 0.05). The change in frequency was negatively correlated with amplitude for both right (r = -0.63, p < 0.05) and left hand (r = -0.57, p < 0.05). The amplitude and frequency changes were represented as a spatial gradient with overlapping and non-overlapping regions spanning the dorsolateral-ventromedial axis of the STN. Whole-brain correlation maps between functional connectivity and motor changes were also inverted between amplitude and frequency changes.

Conclusion

DBS-associated changes in frequency and amplitude were topographically and distinctly represented both locally in STN and in whole-brain functional connectivity.

STN-DBS electrode placement accuracy and motor improvement in Parkinson's disease: systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective neurosurgical treatment for Parkinson's disease. Surgical accuracy is a critical determinant to achieve an adequate DBS effect on motor performance. A two-millimetre surgical accuracy is commonly accepted, but scientific evidence is lacking. A systematic review and meta-analysis of study-level and individual patient data (IPD) was performed by a comprehensive search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Primary outcome measures were (1) radial error between the implanted electrode and target; (2) DBS motor improvement on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (motor examination). On a study level, meta-regression analysis was performed. Also, publication bias was assessed. For IPD meta-analysis, a linear mixed effects model was used. Forty studies (1391 patients) were included, reporting radial errors of 0.45-1.86 mm. Errors within this range did not significantly influence the DBS effect on motor improvement. Additional IPD analysis (206 patients) revealed that a mean radial error of 1.13±0.75 mm did not significantly change the extent of DBS motor improvement. Our meta-analysis showed a huge publication bias on accuracy data in DBS. Therefore, the current literature does not provide an unequivocal upper threshold for acceptable accuracy of STN-DBS surgery. Based on the current literature, DBS-electrodes placed within a 2 mm range of the intended target do not have to be repositioned to enhance motor improvement after STN-DBS for Parkinson's disease. However, an indisputable upper cut-off value for surgical accuracy remains to be established. PROSPERO registration number is CRD42018089539.

Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Reconstruction: Comparison between Lead-DBS and Surgical Planning System

BACKGROUND

Electrode reconstruction for postoperative deep brain simulation (DBS) can be achieved manually using a surgical planning system such as Surgiplan, or in a semi-automated manner using software such as the Lead-DBS toolbox. However, the accuracy of Lead-DBS has not been thoroughly addressed.

METHODS

In our study, we compared the DBS reconstruction results of Lead-DBS and Surgiplan. We included 26 patients (21 with Parkinson's disease and 5 with dystonia) who underwent subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS, and reconstructed the DBS electrodes using the Lead-DBS toolbox and Surgiplan. The electrode contact coordinates were compared between Lead-DBS and Surgiplan with postoperative CT and MRI. The relative positions of the electrode and STN were also compared between the methods. Finally, the optimal contact during follow-up was mapped onto the Lead-DBS reconstruction results to check for overlap between the contacts and the STN.

RESULTS

We found significant differences in all axes between Lead-DBS and Surgiplan with postoperative CT, with the mean variance for the X, Y, and Z coordinates being -0.13, -1.16, and 0.59 mm, respectively. Y and Z coordinates showed significant differences between Lead-DBS and Surgiplan with either postoperative CT or MRI. However, no significant difference in the relative distance of the electrode and the STN was found between the methods. All optimal contacts were located in the STN, with 70% of them located within the dorsolateral region of the STN in the Lead-DBS results.

CONCLUSIONS

Although significant differences in electrode coordinates existed between Lead-DBS and Surgiplan, our results suggest that the coordinate difference was around 1 mm, and Lead-DBS can capture the relative distance between the electrode and the DBS target, suggesting it is reasonably accurate for postoperative DBS reconstruction.

Intraoperative microelectrode recording under general anesthesia guided subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: One institution's experience

Objective

Microelectrode recording (MER) guided subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) under local anesthesia (LA) is widely applied in the management of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Whereas, awake DBS under LA is painful and burdensome for PD patients. We analyzed the influence of general anesthesia (GA) on intraoperative MER, to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of GA in MER guided STN-DBS.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed on the PD patients, who underwent bilateral MER guided STN-DBS in Wuhan Union Hospital from July 2019 to December 2021. The patients were assigned to LA or GA group according to the anesthetic methods implemented. Multidimensional parameters, including MER signals, electrode implantation accuracy, clinical outcome and adverse events, were analyzed.

Results

A total of 40 PD patients were enrolled in this study, including 18 in LA group and 22 in GA group. There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics and baseline characteristics between two groups. Although, the parameters of MER signal, including frequency, inter-spike interval (ISI) and amplitude, were obviously interfered under GA, the waveforms of MER signals were recognizable and shared similar characteristics with LA group. Both LA and GA could achieve effective electrode implantation accuracy and clinical outcome. They also shared similar adverse events postoperatively.

Conclusion

GA is viable and comparable to LA in MER guided STN-DBS for PD, regarding electrode implantation accuracy, clinical outcome and adverse events. Notably, GA is more friendly and acceptable to the patients who are incapable of enduring intraoperative MER under LA.

Clinical Study of Intraoperative Microelectrode Recordings during Awake and Asleep Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Our objective is to analyze the difference of microelectrode recording (MER) during awake and asleep subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) for Parkinson’s disease (PD) and the necessity of MER during “Asleep DBS” under general anesthesia (GA). The differences in MER, target accuracy, and prognosis under different anesthesia methods were analyzed. Additionally, the MER length was compared with the postoperative electrode length by electrode reconstruction and measurement. The MER length of two groups was 5.48 ± 1.39 mm in the local anesthesia (LA) group and 4.38 ± 1.43 mm in the GA group, with a statistical significance between the two groups (p < 0.01). The MER length of the LA group was longer than its postoperative electrode length (p < 0.01), however, there was no significant difference between the MER length and postoperative electrode length in the GA group (p = 0.61). There were also no significant differences in the postoperative electrode length, target accuracy, and postoperative primary and secondary outcome scores between the two groups (p > 0.05). These results demonstrate that “Asleep DBS” under GA is comparable to “Awake DBS” under LA. GA has influences on MER during surgery, but typical STN discharges can still be recorded. MER is not an unnecessary surgical procedure.

Radiomic features of amygdala nuclei and hippocampus subfields help to predict subthalamic deep brain stimulation motor outcomes for Parkinson‘s disease patients

Background and purpose

The aim of the study is to predict the subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) outcomes for Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients using the radiomic features extracted from pre-operative magnetic resonance images (MRI).

Methods

The study included 34 PD patients who underwent DBS implantation in the STN. Five patients (15%) showed poor DBS motor outcome. All together 9 amygdalar nuclei and 12 hippocampus subfields were segmented using Freesurfer 7.0 pipeline from pre-operative MRI images. Furthermore, PyRadiomics platform was used to extract 120 radiomic features for each nuclei and subfield resulting in 5,040 features. Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) feature selection method was employed to reduce the number of features to 20, and 8 machine learning methods (regularized binary logistic regression (LR), decision tree classifier (DT), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), naive Bayes classifier (NB), kernel support vector machine (SVM), deep feed-forward neural network (DNN), one-class support vector machine (OC-SVM), feed-forward neural network-based autoencoder for anomaly detection (DNN-A)) were applied to build the models for poor vs. good and very good STN-DBS motor outcome prediction.

Results

The highest mean prediction accuracy was obtained using regularized LR (96.65 ± 7.24%, AUC 0.98 ± 0.06) and DNN (87.25 ± 14.80%, AUC 0.87 ± 0.18).

Conclusion

The results show the potential power of the radiomic features extracted from hippocampus and amygdala MRI in the prediction of STN-DBS motor outcomes for PD patients.

Lead location as a determinant of motor benefit in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease

Background

Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is regarded as an effective treatment for patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). Clinical benefit, however, varies significantly across patients. Lead location has been hypothesized to play a critical role in determining motor outcome and may account for much of the observed variability reported among patients.

Objective

To retrospectively evaluate the relationship of lead location to motor outcomes in patients who had been implanted previously at another center by employing a novel visualization technology that more precisely determines the location of the DBS lead and its contacts with respect to each patient’s individually defined STN.

Methods

Anatomical models were generated using novel imaging in 40 PD patients who had undergone bilateral STN DBS (80 electrodes) at another center. Patient-specific models of each STN were evaluated to determine DBS electrode contact locations with respect to anterior to posterior and medial to lateral regions of the individualized STNs and compared to the change in the contralateral hemi-body Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-III) motor score.

Results

The greatest improvement in hemi-body motor function was found when active contacts were located within the posterolateral portion of the STN (71.5%). Motor benefit was 52 and 36% for central and anterior segments, respectively. Active contacts within the posterolateral portion also demonstrated the greatest reduction in levodopa dosage (77%).

Conclusion

The degree of motor benefit was dependent on the location of the stimulating contact within the STN. Although other factors may play a role, we provide further evidence in support of the hypothesis that lead location is a critical factor in determining clinical outcomes in STN DBS.

Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Asymmetry Impacts the Parkinsonian Gait Disorder

Background

The preferable position of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) electrodes is proposed to be located in the dorsolateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) to improve general motor performance. The optimal DBS electrode localization for the post-operative improvement of balance and gait is unknown.

Methods

In this single-center, retrospective analyses, 66 Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients (24 female, age 63 ± 7 years) were assessed pre- and post-operatively (8.45 ± 4.2 months after surgery) by using MDS-UPDRS, freezing of gait (FoG) score, Giladi’s gait and falls questionnaire and Berg balance scale. The clinical outcome was related to the DBS electrode coordinates in x, y, z plane as revealed by image-based reconstruction (SureTune™). Binomial generalized linear mixed models with fixed-effect variables electrode asymmetry, parkinsonian subtype, medication, age class and clinical DBS induced changes were analyzed.

Results

Subthalamic nucleus-deep brain stimulation improved all motor, balance and FoG scores in MED OFF condition, however there were heterogeneous results in MED ON condition. DBS electrode reconstructed coordinates impacted the responsiveness of axial symptoms. FoG and balance responders showed slightly more medially located STN electrode coordinates and less medio-lateral asymmetry of the electrode reconstructed coordinates across hemispheres compared to non-responders.

Conclusion

Deep brain stimulation electrode reconstructed coordinates, particularly electrode asymmetry on the medio-lateral axis affected the post-operative responsiveness of balance and FoG symptoms in PD patients.

Topographic connectivity and cellular profiling reveal detailed input pathways and functionally distinct cell types in the subthalamic nucleus

The subthalamic nucleus (STN) controls psychomotor activity and is an efficient therapeutic deep brain stimulation target in individuals with Parkinson's disease. Despite evidence indicating position-dependent therapeutic effects and distinct functions within the STN, the input circuit and cellular profile in the STN remain largely unclear. Using neuroanatomical techniques, we construct a comprehensive connectivity map of the indirect and hyperdirect pathways in the mouse STN. Our circuit- and cellular-level connectivities reveal a topographically graded organization with three types of indirect and hyperdirect pathways (external globus pallidus only, STN only, and collateral). We confirm consistent pathways into the human STN by 7 T MRI-based tractography. We identify two functional types of topographically distinct glutamatergic STN neurons (parvalbumin [PV+/-]) with synaptic connectivity from indirect and hyperdirect pathways. Glutamatergic PV+ STN neurons contribute to burst firing. These data suggest a complex interplay of information integration within the basal ganglia underlying coordinated movement control and therapeutic effects.

Automated Segmentation of Midbrain Structures in High-Resolution Susceptibility Maps Based on Convolutional Neural Network and Transfer Learning

Background

Accurate delineation of the midbrain nuclei, the red nucleus (RN), substantia nigra (SN) and subthalamic nucleus (STN), is important in neuroimaging studies of neurodegenerative and other diseases. This study aims to segment midbrain structures in high-resolution susceptibility maps using a method based on a convolutional neural network (CNN).

Methods

The susceptibility maps of 75 subjects were acquired with a voxel size of 0.83 × 0.83 × 0.80 mm³ on a 3T MRI system to distinguish the RN, SN, and STN. A deeply supervised attention U-net was pre-trained with a dataset of 100 subjects containing susceptibility maps with a voxel size of 0.63 × 0.63 × 2.00 mm³ to provide initial weights for the target network. Five-fold cross-validation over the training cohort was used for all the models’ training and selection. The same test cohort was used for the final evaluation of all the models. Dice coefficients were used to assess spatial overlap agreement between manual delineations (ground truth) and automated segmentation. Volume and magnetic susceptibility values in the nuclei extracted with automated CNN delineation were compared to those extracted by manual tracing. Consistencies of volume and magnetic susceptibility values by different extraction strategies were assessed by Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analyses.

Results

The automated CNN segmentation method achieved mean Dice scores of 0.903, 0.864, and 0.777 for the RN, SN, and STN, respectively. There were no significant differences between the achieved Dice scores and the inter-rater Dice scores (p > 0.05 for each nucleus). The overall volume and magnetic susceptibility values of the nuclei extracted by the automatic CNN method were significantly correlated with those by manual delineation (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Midbrain structures can be precisely segmented in high-resolution susceptibility maps using a CNN-based method.

The Role of Microelectrode Recording and Stereotactic Computed Tomography in Verifying Lead Placement During Awake MRI-Guided Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) has become a cornerstone in the advanced treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Despite its well-established clinical benefit, there is a significant variation in the way surgery is performed. Most centers operate with the patient awake to allow for microelectrode recording (MER) and intraoperative clinical testing. However, technical advances in MR imaging and MRI-guided surgery raise the question whether MER and intraoperative clinical testing still have added value in DBS-surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the added value of MER and intraoperative clinical testing to determine final lead position in awake MRI-guided and stereotactic CT-verified STN-DBS surgery for PD.

METHODS

29 consecutive patients were analyzed retrospectively. Patients underwent awake bilateral STN-DBS with MER and intraoperative clinical testing. The role of MER and clinical testing in determining final lead position was evaluated. Furthermore, interobserver variability in determining the MRI-defined STN along the planned trajectory was investigated. Clinical improvement was evaluated at 12 months follow-up and adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

98% of final leads were placed in the central MER-track with an accuracy of 0.88±0.45 mm. Interobserver variability of the MRI-defined STN was 0.84±0.09. Compared to baseline, mean improvement in MDS-UPDRS-III, PDQ-39 and LEDD were 26.7±16.0 points (54%) (p < 0.001), 9.0±20.0 points (19%) (p = 0.025), and 794±434 mg/day (59%) (p < 0.001) respectively. There were 19 adverse events in 11 patients, one of which (lead malposition requiring immediate postoperative revision) was a serious adverse event.

CONCLUSION

MER and intraoperative clinical testing had no additional value in determining final lead position. These results changed our daily clinical practice to an asleep MRI-guided and stereotactic CT-verified approach.

The Role of Microelectrode Recording in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

STN-DBS is a cornerstone in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). The traditional approach is to use an awake operative technique with microelectrode recording (MER). However, more centers start using an asleep MRI-guided technique without MER.

OBJECTIVE

We systematically reviewed the literature to compare STN-DBS surgery with and without MER for differences in clinical outcome.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases for randomized clinical trials and consecutive cohort studies published between 01-01-2000 and 26-08-2021, that included at least 10 PD patients who had received bilateral STN-DBS.

RESULTS

2,129 articles were identified. After abstract screening and full-text review, 26 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising a total of 34 study groups (29 MER and 5 non-MER). The standardized mean difference (SMD) in change in motor symptoms between baseline (OFF medication) and 6-24 months follow-up (OFF medication and ON stimulation) was 1.64 for the MER group and 1.87 for non-MER group (p = 0.59). SMD in change in levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was 1.14 for the MER group and 0.65 for non-MER group (p < 0.01). Insufficient data were available for comparative analysis of PDQ-39 and complications.

CONCLUSION

The change in motor symptoms from baseline to follow-up did not differ between studies that used MER and those that did not. The postoperative reduction in LEDD from baseline to follow-up was greater in the MER-group. In the absence of high-quality studies comparing both methods, there is a clear need for a well-designed comparative trial.

Placement accuracy of the second electrode in bilateral deep brain stimulation surgery

PURPOSE

Due to brain shift during bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, placement of the second electrode may be subjected to more error than that of the first electrode. The authors aimed to investigate the accuracy of second electrode placement in this setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients with Parkinson's disease who underwent bilateral DBS surgery (110 electrodes) were retrospectively evaluated. The targets were subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus interna (GPi) in 40 and 15 cases, respectively. Preoperative planning and postoperative electrode images were co-registered to compare the error margin between the two sides.

RESULTS

There is a statistically significant difference in the directional axis error along the y axis only when comparing each laterality (posterior 0.04 ± 1.21 mm vs anterior 0.41 ± 1.07 mm, p = 0.006). There is no significant difference of other error parameters, final track location, and number of microelectrode recording passes between the two sides. In a subgroup analysis, there is a significant difference in directional axis error along the y axis only in the STN subgroup (posterior 0.40 ± 1.05 mm vs anterior 0.18 ± 1.04 mm, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Although a statistically significant difference in directional axis error along the y axis was found between first and second electrode placements in the STN group but not in the GPi group, its magnitude is well below the clinically significant threshold.

Clinical applications of magnetic resonance imaging based functional and structural connectivity

Advances in computational neuroimaging techniques have expanded the armamentarium of imaging tools available for clinical applications in clinical neuroscience. Non-invasive, in vivo brain MRI structural and functional network mapping has been used to identify therapeutic targets, define eloquent brain regions to preserve, and gain insight into pathological processes and treatments as well as prognostic biomarkers. These tools have the real potential to inform patient-specific treatment strategies. Nevertheless, a realistic appraisal of clinical utility is needed that balances the growing excitement and interest in the field with important limitations associated with these techniques. Quality of the raw data, minutiae of the processing methodology, and the statistical models applied can all impact on the results and their interpretation. A lack of standardization in data acquisition and processing has also resulted in issues with reproducibility. This limitation has had a direct impact on the reliability of these tools and ultimately, confidence in their clinical use. Advances in MRI technology and computational power as well as automation and standardization of processing methods, including machine learning approaches, may help address some of these issues and make these tools more reliable in clinical use. In this review, we will highlight the current clinical uses of MRI connectomics in the diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders; balancing emerging applications and technologies with limitations of connectivity analytic approaches to present an encompassing and appropriate perspective.

Deep brain stimulation programming strategies: segmented leads, independent current sources, and future technology

Introduction: Advances in neuromodulation and deep brain stimulation (DBS) technologies have facilitated opportunities for improved clinical benefit and side effect management. However, new technologies have added complexity to clinic-based DBS programming.Areas covered: In this article, we review basic basal ganglia physiology, proposed mechanisms of action and technical aspects of DBS. We discuss novel DBS technologies for movement disorders including the role of advanced imaging software, lead design, IPG design, novel programming techniques including directional stimulation and coordinated reset neuromodulation. Additional topics include the use of potential biomarkers, such as local field potentials, electrocorticography, and adaptive stimulation. We will also discuss future directions including optogenetically inspired DBS.Expert opinion: The introduction of DBS for the management of movement disorders has expanded treatment options. In parallel with our improved understanding of brain physiology and neuroanatomy, new technologies have emerged to address challenges associated with neuromodulation, including variable effectiveness, side-effects, and programming complexity. Advanced functional neuroanatomy, improved imaging, real-time neurophysiology, improved electrode designs, and novel programming techniques have collectively been driving improvements in DBS outcomes.

Structural Connectivity Patterns of Side Effects Induced by Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

Background: Tractography based on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) models the structural connectivity of the human brain. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the subthalamic nucleus is an effective treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease, but may induce adverse effects. This study investigated the relationship between structural connectivity patterns of DBS electrodes and stimulation-induced side effects. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients with Parkinson's disease treated with bilateral subthalamic DBS were examined. Overall, 168 electrode contacts were categorized as inducing or noninducing depending on their capability for inducing side effects such as motor effects, paresthesia, dysarthria, oculomotor effects, hyperkinesia, and other complications as assessed during the initial programming session. Furthermore, the connectivity of each contact with target regions was evaluated by probabilistic tractography based on DWI. Finally, stimulation sites and structural connectivity patterns of inducing and noninducing contacts were compared. Results: Inducing contacts differed across the various side effects and from those mitigating Parkinson's symptoms. Although contacts showed a largely overlapping spatial distribution within the subthalamic region, they could be distinguished by their connectivity patterns. In particular, inducing contacts were more likely connected with supplementary motor areas (hyperkinesia, dysarthria), frontal cortex (oculomotor), fibers of the internal capsule (paresthesia), and the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuitry (dysarthria). Discussion: Side effects induced by DBS seem to be associated with distinct connectivity patterns. Cerebellar connections are hardly associated with side effects, although they seem relevant for mitigating motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. A symptom-specific, connectivity-based approach for target planning in DBS may enhance treatment outcomes and reduce adverse effects.

Selection of deep brain stimulation contacts using volume of tissue activated software following subthalamic nucleus stimulation

OBJECTIVE

High-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is effective in the treatment of motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Using a patient-specific lead and volume of tissue activated (VTA) software, it is possible to visualize contact positions in the context of the patient's own anatomy. In this study, the authors' aim was to demonstrate that VTA software can be used in clinical practice to help determine the clinical effectiveness of stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing DBS of the STN.

METHODS

Brain images of 26 patients undergoing STN DBS were analyzed using VTA software. Preoperative clinical and neuropsychological data were collected. Contacts were chosen by two experts in DBS blinded to the clinical data. A therapeutic window of amplitude was determined. These results were compared with the parameter settings for each patient. Data were obtained at 3 months and 1 year postsurgery.

RESULTS

In 90.4% (95% CI 82%-98%) of the patients, the contacts identified by the VTA software were concordant with the clinically effective contacts or with an effective contact in contact-by-contact testing. The therapeutic window of amplitude selected virtually included 81.3% of the clinical amplitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

VTA software appears to present significant concordance with clinical data for selecting contacts and stimulation parameters that could help in postoperative follow-up and programming.

Stimulation Sweet Spot in Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation - Myth or Reality? A Critical Review of Literature

INTRODUCTION

While deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been extensively used for more than 20 years in Parkinson's disease (PD), the optimal area of stimulation to relieve motor symptoms remains elusive.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed at localizing the sweet spot within the subthalamic region by performing a systematic review of the literature.

METHOD

PubMed database was searched for published studies exploring optimal stimulation location for STN DBS in PD, published between 2000 and 2019. A standardized assessment procedure based on methodological features was applied to select high-quality publications. Studies conducted more than 3 months after the DBS procedure, employing lateralized scores and/or stimulation condition, and reporting the volume of tissue activated or the position of the stimulating contact within the subthalamic region were considered in the final analysis.

RESULTS

Out of 439 references, 24 were finally retained, including 21 studies based on contact location and 3 studies based on volume of tissue activated (VTA). Most studies (all VTA-based studies and 13 of the 21 contact-based studies) suggest the superior-lateral STN and the adjacent white matter as the optimal sites for stimulation. Remaining contact-based studies were either inconclusive (5/21), favoured the caudal zona incerta (1/21), or suggested a better outcome of STN stimulation than adjacent white matter stimulation (2/21).

CONCLUSION

Using a standardized methodological approach, our review supports the presence of a sweet spot located within the supero-lateral STN and extending to the adjacent white matter.

Directional Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: Results of an International Crossover Study With Randomized, Double-Blind Primary Endpoint

OBJECTIVE

Published reports on directional deep brain stimulation (DBS) have been limited to small, single-center investigations. Therapeutic window (TW) is used to describe the range of stimulation amplitudes achieving symptom relief without side effects. This crossover study performed a randomized double-blind assessment of TW for directional and omnidirectional DBS in a large cohort of patients implanted with a DBS system in the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson's disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants received omnidirectional stimulation for the first three months after initial study programming, followed by directional DBS for the following three months. The primary endpoint was a double-blind, randomized evaluation of TW for directional vs. omnidirectional stimulation at three months after initial study programming. Additional data recorded at three- and six-month follow-ups included stimulation preference, therapeutic current strength, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III motor score, and quality of life.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 234 subjects (62 ± 8 years, 33% female). TW was wider using directional stimulation in 183 of 202 subjects (90.6%). The mean increase in TW with directional stimulation was 41% (2.98 ± 1.38 mA, compared to 2.11 ± 1.33 mA for omnidirectional). UPDRS part III motor score on medication improved 42.4% at three months (after three months of omnidirectional stimulation) and 43.3% at six months (after three months of directional stimulation) with stimulation on, compared to stimulation off. After six months, 52.8% of subjects blinded to stimulation type (102/193) preferred the period with directional stimulation, and 25.9% (50/193) preferred the omnidirectional period. The directional period was preferred by 58.5% of clinicians (113/193) vs. 21.2% (41/193) who preferred the omnidirectional period.

CONCLUSION

Directional stimulation yielded a wider TW compared to omnidirectional stimulation and was preferred by blinded subjects and clinicians.

Electrophysiologic Mapping for Target Acquisition in Deep Brain Stimulation May Become Unnecessary in the Era of Intraoperative Imaging

OBJECTIVE

Electrophysiologic mapping (EM) has been instrumental in advancing neuroscience and ensuring accurate lead placement for deep brain stimulation. However, EM is associated with increased operative time, expense, and potential risk. Intraoperative imaging to verify lead placement provides an opportunity to reassess the clinical role of EM. We investigated whether EM 1) provides new information that corrects suboptimal preoperative target selection by the physician or 2) simply corrects intraoperative stereotactic error, which can instead be quickly corrected with intraoperative imaging.

METHODS

Deep brain stimulation lead location errors were evaluated by measuring whether repositioning leads based on EM directed the final lead placement 1) away from or 2) toward the original target. We retrospectively identified 50 patients with 61 leads that required repositioning directed by EM. The stereotactic coordinates of each lead were determined with intraoperative computed tomography.

RESULTS

In 45 of 61 leads (74%), the electrophysiologically directed repositioning moved the lead toward the initial target. The mean radial errors between the preoperative plan and targeted contact coordinates before and after repositioning were 2.2 and 1.5 mm, respectively (P < 0.001). Microelectrode recording was more likely than test stimulation to direct leads toward the initial target (88% vs. 63%; P = 0.03). The nucleus targeted was associated with the likelihood of moving toward the initial target.

CONCLUSIONS

Electrophysiologic mapping corrected primarily for errors in lead placement rather than providing new information regarding errors in target selection. Thus, intraoperative imaging and improvements in stereotactic techniques may reduce or even eliminate dependence on EM.

[Deep brain stimulation in neurological and psychiatric diseases]

Die invasive Hirnstimulation (tiefe Hirnstimulation [THS], „deep brain stimulation“ [DBS]) ist mittlerweile ein etabliertes Therapieverfahren bei einer Reihe neurologischer Erkrankungen insbesondere Bewegungsstörungen. Die Anzahl der mit einer THS versorgten Patienten steigt stetig, die technische Entwicklung der THS-Systeme schreitet voran und neue Indikationen werden aktuell in Studien überprüft. Im folgenden Beitrag soll ein Überblick über die aktuellen Indikationen und ein Ausblick auf zukünftige Entwicklungen der THS bei Bewegungsstörungen und psychiatrischen Erkrankungen gegeben werden.

7T MRI and Computational Modeling Supports a Critical Role of Lead Location in Determining Outcomes for Deep Brain Stimulation: A Case Report

Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for Parkinson’s disease motor symptoms. The ideal site for implantation within STN, however, remains controversial. While many argue that placement of a DBS lead within the sensorimotor territory of the STN yields better motor outcomes, others report similar effects with leads placed in the associative or motor territory of the STN, while still others assert that placing a DBS lead “anywhere within a 6-mm-diameter cylinder centered at the presumed middle of the STN (based on stereotactic atlas coordinates) produces similar clinical efficacy.” These discrepancies likely result from methodological differences including targeting preferences, imaging acquisition and the use of brain atlases that do not account for patient-specific anatomic variability. We present a first-in-kind within-patient demonstration of severe mood side effects and minimal motor improvement in a Parkinson’s disease patient following placement of a DBS lead in the limbic/associative territory of the STN who experienced marked improvement in motor benefit and resolution of mood side effects following repositioning the lead within the STN sensorimotor territory. 7 Tesla (7 T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were used to generate a patient-specific anatomical model of the STN with parcellation into distinct functional territories and computational modeling to assess the relative degree of activation of motor, associative and limbic territories.

Sweetspot Mapping in Deep Brain Stimulation: Strengths and Limitations of Current Approaches

OBJECTIVES

Open questions remain regarding the optimal target, or sweetspot, for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in, for example, Parkinson's disease. Previous studies introduced different methods of mapping DBS effects to determine sweetspots. While having a direct impact on surgical targeting and postoperative programming in DBS, these methods so far have not been compared.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study investigated five previously published DBS mapping approaches regarding their potential to correctly identify a predefined target. Methods were investigated in silico in eight different use-case scenarios, which incorporated different types of clinical data, noise, and differences in underlying neuroanatomy. Dice coefficients were calculated to determine the overlap between identified sweetspots and the predefined target. Additionally, out-of-sample predictive capabilities were assessed using the amount of explained variance R² .

RESULTS

The five investigated methods resulted in highly variable sweetspots. Methods based on voxel-wise statistics against average outcomes showed the best performance overall. While predictive capabilities were high, even in the best of cases Dice coefficients remained limited to values around 0.5, highlighting the overall limitations of sweetspot identification.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the strengths and limitations of current approaches to DBS sweetspot mapping. Those limitations need to be taken into account when considering the clinical implications. All future approaches should be investigated in silico before being applied to clinical data.

Directional Leads for Deep Brain Stimulation: Technical Notes and Experiences

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an approved treatment for movement disorders. Despite high precision in electrode placement, side effects do occur by current spread to adjacent fibers or nuclei. Directional leads (D-leads) are designed to adapt the volume of stimulation relative to the position within the target by horizontal and vertical current steering directions. The feasibility of implanting these new leads, possible difficulties, and complications were the focus of this study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This analysis is based on 31 patients who underwent a DBS procedure with D-leads and an implantable pulse generator (IPG) capable of multiple independent current control and 31 patients who received non-D-leads with a similar IPG. While trajectory planning and most steps of the surgical procedure were identical to conventional DBS lead implantation, differences in indication, electrode handling, lead control, and complications were documented and analyzed in comparison to a control group with ring electrodes.

RESULTS

During a consecutive series of 51 patients implanted with a DBS system, 31 patients (60.1%) were selected for implantation of D-leads and received 59 D-leads, 28 bilateral, and 3 unilateral implantations. The control group consisted of a consecutive series of a comparable time period, with 31 patients who received conventional ring electrodes. Indication of D-lead implantation was based on the anatomic conditions of the trajectory and target regions and the results of intraoperative test stimulations. In 1 patient, primary D-lead implantation on both sides was performed without any microelectrode implantation to minimize risk for hemorrhage. In the absence of an externally visible marker, the control of implant depth and of the orientation of the D-lead needs to be controlled by X-ray resulting in a longer fluoroscopy time and, therefore, higher X-ray dose compared to conventional lead implantations (415.53 vs. 328.96 Gy cm2; p = 0.09). Mean procedure duration for complete system implantation did not differ between either type of leads (ring electrodes vs. D-leads, 08:55 vs. 09:02 h:min). Surgical complications were unrelated to the type of electrode: surgical revision was necessary and successfully performed in 1 subcutaneous hematoma and 1 unilateral electrode dislocation. A rather rare complication, symptomatic idiopathic delayed-onset edema, was observed in 4 patients with D-leads. They recovered completely within 1-3 weeks, spontaneously or after short-term cortisone medication. In the control group, in a series of 31 patients (20 implanted with Medtronic 3389 lead and 11 with Boston Scientific Vercise lead), not a single problem of this kind was encountered at any time.

CONCLUSION

Precise positioning of D-leads is more challenging than that of conventional DBS leads. By adding an external lead marker, control of optimal lead position and orientation is enhanced. In case of supposed increased risk for hemorrhage because of vessels crossing all possible trajectories in the pre-surgical navigated simulation program, primary D-lead implantation instead of the sharper microelectrodes may be a feasible alternative and it may offer more options than ring electrodes especially in these cases. Prospective studies comparing ring-mode stimulation to directional stimulation to examine the differences of the clinical effects have been started.

Atlas-independent, N-of-1 tissue activation modeling to map optimal regions of subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease

•

Neuroanatomical variations among patients are obscured in atlas-based VTA modeling.

•

N-of-1 neuroanatomical and VTA modeling enables patient-level precision.

•

Mean optimal stimulation is dorsomedial to the STN, near its posterior half.

•

Individual VTAs deviate from optimal stimulation sites to varying degrees.

•

Optimal stimulation sites for rigidity, bradykinesia, and tremor partially overlap.

Background

Motor outcomes after subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) for Parkinson disease (PD) vary considerably among patients and strongly depend on stimulation location. The objective of this retrospective study was to map the regions of optimal STN DBS for PD using an atlas-independent, fully individualized (N-of-1) tissue activation modeling approach and to assess the relationship between patient-level therapeutic volumes of tissue activation (VTAs) and motor improvement.

Methods

The stimulation-induced electric field for 40 PD patients treated with bilateral STN DBS was modeled using finite element analysis. Neurostimulation models were generated for each patient, incorporating their individual STN anatomy, DBS lead position and orientation, anisotropic tissue conductivity, and clinical stimulation settings. A voxel-based analysis of the VTAs was then used to map the optimal location of stimulation. The amount of stimulation in specific regions relative to the STN was measured and compared between STNs with more and less optimal stimulation, as determined by their motor improvement scores and VTA. The relationship between VTA location and motor outcome was then assessed using correlation analysis. Patient variability in terms of STN anatomy, active contact position, and VTA location were also evaluated. Results from the N-of-1 model were compared to those from a simplified VTA model.

Results

Tissue activation modeling mapped the optimal location of stimulation to regions medial, posterior, and dorsal to the STN centroid. These regions extended beyond the STN boundary towards the caudal zona incerta (cZI). The location of the VTA and active contact position differed significantly between STNs with more and less optimal stimulation in the dorsal-ventral and anterior-posterior directions. Therapeutic stimulation spread noticeably more in the dorsal and posterior directions, providing additional evidence for cZI as an important DBS target. There were significant linear relationships between the amount of dorsal and posterior stimulation, as measured by the VTA, and motor improvement. These relationships were more robust than those between active contact position and motor improvement. There was high variability in STN anatomy, active contact position, and VTA location among patients. Spherical VTA modeling was unable to reproduce these results and tended to overestimate the size of the VTA.

Conclusion

Accurate characterization of the spread of stimulation is needed to optimize STN DBS for PD. High variability in neuroanatomy, stimulation location, and motor improvement among patients highlights the need for individualized modeling techniques. The atlas-independent, N-of-1 tissue activation modeling approach presented in this study can be used to develop and evaluate stimulation strategies to improve clinical outcomes on an individual basis.

Mapping of subthalamic nucleus using microelectrode recordings during deep brain stimulation

Alongside stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging, microelectrode recording (MER) is frequently used during the deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for optimal target localization. The aim of this study is to optimize subthalamic nucleus (STN) mapping using MER analytical patterns. 16 patients underwent bilateral STN-DBS. MER was performed simultaneously for 5 microelectrodes in a setting of Ben’s-gun pattern in awake patients. Using spikes and background activity several different parameters and their spectral estimates in various frequency bands including low frequency (2–7 Hz), Alpha (8–12 Hz), Beta (sub-divided as Low_Beta (13–20 Hz) and High_Beta (21–30 Hz)) and Gamma (31 to 49 Hz) were computed. The optimal STN lead placement with the most optimal clinical effect/side-effect ratio accorded to the maximum spike rate in 85% of the implantation. Mean amplitude of background activity in the low beta frequency range was corresponding to right depth in 85% and right location in 94% of the implantation respectively. MER can be used for STN mapping and intraoperative decisions for the implantation of DBS electrode leads with a high accuracy. Spiking and background activity in the beta range are the most promising independent parameters for the delimitation of the proper anatomical site.

Functional segregation and integration within the human subthalamic nucleus from a micro- and meso-level perspective

The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a core basal ganglia structure involved in the control of motor, cognitive, motivational and affective functions. The (challenged) tripartite subdivision hypothesis places these functions into distinct sensorimotor, cognitive/associative, and limbic subregions based on the topography of cortical projections. To a large extent, this hypothesis is used to motivate the choice of target coordinates for implantation of deep brain stimulation electrodes for treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Yet, the parallel organization of basal ganglia circuits has been known to allow considerable cross-talk, which might contribute to the occurrence of neuropsychiatric side effects when stimulating the dorsolateral, putative sensorimotor, part of the STN for treatment of Parkinson's disease. Any functional segregation within the STN is expected to be reflected both at micro-level microscopy and meso-level neural population activity. As such, we review the current empirical evidence from anterograde tracing and immunocytochemistry studies and from local field potential recordings for delineating the STN into distinct subregions. The spatial distribution of immunoreactivity presents as a combination of gradients, and although neural activity in distinct frequency bands appears spatially clustered, there is substantial overlap in peak locations. We argue that regional specialization without sharply defined borders is likely most representative of the STN's functional organization.

Modeling of Electric Fields in Individual Imaging Atlas for Capsular Threshold Prediction of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Study

Background: Modeling of deep brain stimulation electric fields and anatomy-based software might improve post-operative management of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have benefitted from subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS).

Objective: We compared clinical and software-guided determination of the thresholds for current diffusion to the pyramidal tract, the most frequent limiting side effect in post-operative management of STN-DBS PD patients.

Methods: We assessed monopolar reviews in 16 consecutive STN-DBS PD patients and retrospectively compared clinical capsular thresholds, which had been assessed according to standard clinical practice, to those predicted by volume of tissue activated (VTA) model software. All the modeling steps were performed blinded from patients' clinical evaluations.

Results: At the group level, we found a significant correlation (p = 0.0001) when performing statistical analysis on the z-scored capsular thresholds, but with a low regression coefficient (r = 0.2445). When considering intra-patient analysis, we found significant correlations (p < 0.05) between capsular threshold as modeled with the software and capsular threshold as determined clinically in five patients (31.2%).

Conclusions: In this pilot study, the VTA model software was of limited assistance in identifying capsular thresholds for the whole cohort due to a large inter-patient variability. Clinical testing remains the gold standard in selecting stimulation parameters for STN-DBS in PD.

Optimal target localisation and eight-year outcome for subthalamic stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is a useful therapy to improve motor functions and reduce dependence on medication in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The purpose of the study is to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of STN-DBS and to determine the optimal placement of electrodes that for the most positive outcomes.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 42 PD patients were evaluated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) before and after STN-DBS lead implantation. Postoperatively, patients were evaluated during both the medication 'ON' period (medication suppressed symptoms) and the medication 'OFF' period (when medication failed to suppress symptoms), and the results were compared to the baseline values prior to surgery. Follow-up assessments, focusing on motor functions, were performed 1, 3, 5, and 8 years after the initial implantation surgery. The locations of electrodes were measured and compared against the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

STN-DBS remarkably improved the UPDRS-II, -III, and -IV dyskinesia and motor fluctuation scores in the OFF-medication condition when compared to baseline values. In addition, the dose of levodopa needed to elicit an effect declined sharply in the OFF-medication condition. Over time, the axial signs progressively worsened even with continuous stimulation and a levodopa response. The location of electrodes correlated with the most beneficial outcomes was the dorsal STN margin.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm that overall, stimulation-induced motor improvement is still evident after 8 years. However, the primary best outcome declines with the progressive loss of favourable axial signs.

Deep brain stimulation: Imaging on a group level

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment option for movement disorders and is under investigation for treatment in a growing number of other brain diseases. It has been shown that exact electrode placement crucially affects the efficacy of DBS and this should be considered when investigating novel indications or DBS targets. To measure clinical improvement as a function of electrode placement, neuroscientific methodology and specialized software tools are needed. Such tools should have the goal to make electrode placement comparable across patients and DBS centers, and include statistical analysis options to validate and define optimal targets. Moreover, to allow for comparability across different centers, these need to be performed within an algorithmically and anatomically standardized and openly available group space. With the publication of Lead-DBS software in 2014, an open-source tool was introduced that allowed for precise electrode reconstructions based on pre- and postoperative neuroimaging data. Here, we introduce Lead Group, implemented within the Lead-DBS environment and specifically designed to meet aforementioned demands. In the present article, we showcase the various processing streams of Lead Group in a retrospective cohort of 51 patients suffering from Parkinson's disease, who were implanted with DBS electrodes to the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Specifically, we demonstrate various ways to visualize placement of all electrodes in the group and map clinical improvement values to subcortical space. We do so by using active coordinates and volumes of tissue activated, showing converging evidence of an optimal DBS target in the dorsolateral STN. Second, we relate DBS outcome to the impact of each electrode on local structures by measuring overlap of stimulation volumes with the STN. Finally, we explore the software functions for connectomic mapping, which may be used to relate DBS outcomes to connectivity estimates with remote brain areas. The manuscript is accompanied by a walkthrough tutorial which allows users to reproduce all main results presented here. All data and code needed to reproduce results are openly available.

The impact of modern-day neuroimaging on the field of deep brain stimulation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established but growing treatment option for multiple brain disorders. Over the last decade, electrode placement and their effects were increasingly analyzed with modern-day neuroimaging methods like spatial normalization, fibertracking, or resting-state functional MRI. Similarly, specialized basal ganglia MRI sequences were introduced and imaging at high field strengths has become increasingly popular.

RECENT FINDINGS

To facilitate the process of precise electrode localizations, specialized software pipelines were introduced. By those means, DBS targets could recently be refined and significant relationships between electrode placement and clinical improvement could be shown. Furthermore, by combining electrode reconstructions with network imaging methods, relationships between electrode connectivity and clinical improvement were investigated. This led to a broad series of imaging-based insights about DBS that are reviewed in the present work.

SUMMARY

The reviewed literature makes a strong case that brain imaging plays an increasingly important role in DBS targeting and programming. Furthermore, brain imaging will likely help to better understand the mechanism of action of DBS.

Modulation of Nigrofugal and Pallidofugal Pathways in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a well-established surgical therapy for patients with Parkinson disease (PD).

OBJECTIVE

To define the role of adjacent white matter stimulation in the effectiveness of STN-DBS.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 43 patients with PD who received bilateral STN-DBS. The volumes of activated tissue were analyzed to obtain significant stimulation clusters predictive of 4 clinical outcomes: improvements in bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, and reduction of dopaminergic medication. Tractography of the nigrofugal and pallidofugal pathways was performed. The significant clusters were used to calculate the involvement of the nigrofugal and pallidofugal pathways and the STN.

RESULTS

The clusters predictive of rigidity and tremor improvement were dorsal to the STN with most of the clusters outside of the STN. These clusters preferentially involved the pallidofugal pathways. The cluster predictive of bradykinesia improvement was located in the central part of the STN with an extension outside of the STN. The cluster predictive of dopaminergic medication reduction was located ventrolateral and caudal to the STN. These clusters preferentially involved the nigrofugal pathways.

CONCLUSION

Improvements in rigidity and tremor mainly involved the pallidofugal pathways dorsal to the STN. Improvement in bradykinesia mainly involved the central part of the STN and the nigrofugal pathways ventrolateral to the STN. Maximal reduction in dopaminergic medication following STN-DBS was associated with an exclusive involvement of the nigrofugal pathways.

Integrative and Network-Specific Connectivity of the Basal Ganglia and Thalamus Defined in Individuals

The basal ganglia, thalamus, and cerebral cortex form an interconnected network implicated in many neurological and psychiatric illnesses. A better understanding of cortico-subcortical circuits in individuals will aid in development of personalized treatments. Using precision functional mapping-individual-specific analysis of highly sampled human participants-we investigated individual-specific functional connectivity between subcortical structures and cortical functional networks. This approach revealed distinct subcortical zones of network specificity and multi-network integration. Integration zones were systematic, with convergence of cingulo-opercular control and somatomotor networks in the ventral intermediate thalamus (motor integration zones), dorsal attention and visual networks in the pulvinar, and default mode and multiple control networks in the caudate nucleus. The motor integration zones were present in every individual and correspond to consistently successful sites of deep brain stimulation (DBS; essential tremor). Individually variable subcortical zones correspond to DBS sites with less consistent treatment effects, highlighting the importance of PFM for neurosurgery, neurology, and psychiatry.